It’s not about the individual who killed her but who had her killed. Defiantly a pro hit for what I believe she was working on,and the possibility of exposing some high ranking figures in public life for what they done or doing.
Whoever did this knew where she lived. Knew when she was away from home filming and knew when she was at home. Who could possibly know all this amount of detail ?
Bollocks. She was not a journalist, she didn't expose anyone. She was just a Diana-alike presenter. Another BBC Norman. That's why the press get so het up about her murder, she was Establishment with a very big capital E. If she had been anyone else this story would have faded away. She was either mistaken for someone else or she was just killed for being famous. No mystery, no scandal, just another sad death.
.She was murdered by a contract killer hired by the powers-that-be because she was going to expose a pedophile ring whose members were very high profile public figures in politics, business and media.
She was about the blow the lid on a VIP pedo ring, so she was silenced by the state security services Jill was also a very good investigative journalist. The long and short of it is, this case will never be solved because they dont want it solved.
@@ontheslide2339 He's wrong in my opinion she saw something on crime watch and actually read part of it so M15 as usual murdered her. Want proof? Richard D Hall documentary on you tube
I don't buy that. All of that information would not have solely been in her head, to be obliterated by a bullet. She worked with a team - a huge team, given her profile. The information, if it existed, would have been on file and accessible to her team. Though she is described as an "investigative journalist" she didn't go around with a magnifying glass looking for clues like Sherlock Holmes - her team would have done all the legwork. She was the pretty, talented public face of the investigation (if there was one). Any explosive information would have come to light regardless of her death.
I remember this case. Barry George was obviously shoehorned into the frame from the start. And are we going to swallow one of the most famous faces in the country was mistaken for someone else in a 'wrong place, wrong time' scenario? The only real question is: who was she and her team investigating just before the murder? There's your motive.
My cousin was actually in with him and said everyone knew he didn’t do it, he was just a weirdo and should of been in Broadmoor (I think it’s called) if anything but he deffo didn’t have it in him to kill, a harmless weirdo which isn’t a crime.
Check out Jon Wedger on this topic. They took him off finding pedos as he found too many… they get about on barges and Rosie and Jim type dolls on them have a meaning!!!!!
My husband, Tommy, worked at HMP Parkhurst for almost all his time as a Prison Officer, and he was told by a prisoner on A Wing that Jill Dando had been taken out by a professional hitman because she was involved in an investigation into serious sex offences committed by establishment figures, including some at the BBC. This was told to my husband on A Wing during the summer of 2001, and the prisoner even said that the word on the street in London was that was a Serb hit team that had been hired to kill Jill Dando.
My initial reply to this comment seems to have been automatically deleted even though I had put the link in 4 bits. Let's try another way without my opening rant, lol; (link is in 5 bits with each bit in inverted commas) ''bit'', then ''chu'' and then ''te.'' (there is a dot at the end of the te) and then ''com/video'' and then ''/RqxntJKCahFN/''
Higher up the food chain i think much higher after all weve a well known individual giving 12 million hush money to a woman hes never met not a word from msm but russel brands crucified for things hes admitted to and apologised for
@magahatatheist1838 Let's look at the numbers. Jill is murdered in 1999. How many years did Jimmy's 'career' and charity-focused public profile continue after that time? (My memory is shot - I'm struggling to recall whether Jimmy was exposed while still alive?)
@@ryanseager7347 If that were the case It would be highly classified therefore we will never know except for perhaps a 'death bed confession' at some point in the future.
As a retired police officer, the first rule in an enquiry is, let the evidence lead the enquiry to the suspect. Never mould the evidence to fit the suspect. That is a sure well documented method of discrediting the enquiry. Maybe not immediately but, years later after innocent people have served time. Even if the suspect is the offender, flawed investigations are always shown to be flawed. The innocent serve time while the guilty walk to commit further crimes.
''the first rule in an enquiry is, let the evidence lead the enquiry to the suspect. Never mould the evidence to fit the suspect.''.. That sums up the Lucy Letby case.
The round or bullet used to kill her was found to have had half of the black powder propellant charge (gunpowder) removed as to minimise the noise of firing, prior to the firing of the round. This hinted at the time, that the murder was committed by a professional.
No one heard a gun shot. Regular bullets make a lot of noise. So what you said makes total sense. Number 1: reducing the amount of propellant by half where the bullet is still lethal at close range but does not make enough noise to attract attention. Number 2: Only 1 bullet was used. Number 3: She was killed immediately after getting out of her car and approaching her house arriving home from her fiance's house. Somebody was studying her routine, following her, or waiting for her. It was just too surgical to be a random nut case.
And since then how many politicians..sirs.. football and gymnastics coaches have been outed as the worst of the worst peedies ..how did Saville keep getting away with it..she new about the circle.
So why are you watching this channel Dan reported in the media only a few days ago is still under investigation and this channel GBnews is monitoring the allegations BBC stated 5 days ago ..
Savile would've sung like a canary had he been questioned, royals, MPs, police commissioners, other celebs, and of course, BBC executives would've been taken down with him...they had to protect him.
She was investigating a paedophile ring at the BBC that also included politicians and famous celebrities . This was a professional hit and it seems very strange her brother washes over this and says it's a random murder.
I'd be looking at the brother, if he doesn't want justice there must be a reason, I doubt money would make him say it was random. How would anyone approach him offering money without creating suspicion or not knowing if he would speak out about a bribe. I wonder where the brother is now? And what his opinion would be today?
@@doctor_gibbo1392so why was cliff Richard sent to try to stop her from talking about it, if it wasn't happening, then when he failed to stop her they killed her.
Hamish Campbell is the problem in this case, he has a proven record of blundering high profile cases. He should be investigated himself, he knowingly had an innocent man imprisoned for 8 years of his life , to cover his own incompetence
One of the most shocking and sad cases in British criminal history. Who or why, is still not answered even with the very high profile victim, and a seemingly extensive investigation. RIP Jill.
It was OBVIOUSLY a professional hit FFS. Anyone who thinks otherwise is totally asleep. I fully woke up 2yrs earlier when TB was given control of the UK. The rest is our ugly history.
I remember Barry George. I worked at Universal records in Hammersmith and he used to come into the reception saying that he was a cousin of Freddie Mercury. We used to give him CDS and he would go. Very unthreatening guy just. The police came around and asked us questions about him. I remember saying that their was no way he woulld of or could have done that. He was just a bit odd. I told the polic that is the wrong guy he defenatly would never have done it. Hope Barry gets the justice he deserves.
One of the most naive things you could ever think is "he could never do it". History is full of thousands murderers and rapists, fraudsters and thieves who "could never do it".
It's a theory unfortunately. No evidence whatsoever she was investigating anybody. Just hearsay. Remember a lot of them knew what saville was doing. But they'd never admit that. Remember when baddiel & skinner joked about saville and 12 year old girl on a comedy show back in 1996 . They knew what he was up too. Just like a lot of em . Jill was too ambitious, was climbing the ladder of stardom. Her killer was most likely an ex partner or lover. I agree Barry George was an easy scapegoat.
The treatment of Barry George was an absolute disgrace and a pathetic police omnishambles of an investigation. Shameful. He should never have spent a day in custody and deserves an ex-gratia payment of some substance.
Barry George was just looking for an alibi in his area. They subsequently turned it into something detrimental and used his Illness and photographs of him dressed in SAS attirement etc as a circus parade for tabloid newspapers to make him look as guilty and crazy as possible. They should've all apologized and compensated him.
Whilst the police were certainly incompetent and/or dishonest (probably both), George was a nasty piece of work, especially in his attitudes towards women. The police took the easy route, saying "Let's find the local weirdo/sex pest and fit them up for the murder". It wasn't hard for them to pin it on George, who had a record of stalking and previous convictions for indecent assault and attempted rape. No, he should not have been convicted of Dando's murder, but had he been less of a PoS, he wouldn't have been so easy to fit up. It's difficult to feel much sympathy for him.
@@laurieharper1526 I agree with you , he should've had more supervision and input from his family and the mental health. I guess he did after the publicity of this case. By then of course his previous actions might've been non existent.
The head of the police investigation Hamish Campbell remains convinced to this day that Barry George did it. In the end, he got off on a technicality that suggested there was a 1 in 100 chance that fibres from a gun shot could have made their way to his top pocket, and therefore the conviction was unsound. George was a stalker, an attempted rapist, obsessed with Dando, and owned guns. I can't argue with Campbell. I'm absolutely convinced myself that George did it. He was never proven innocent. Let it sink in. He was allowed out because of a 1% possibility that those fibres made it into his top pocket erroneously.
Exactly. High profile names at the BBC. That's what no ones talking about. I'm only one episode into the Netflix thing but I have no doubt it won't be mentioned.
Her brother is wrong too. Her killer knew she was visiting her house every Monday morning. That's not being in the wrong place at the wrong time that's premeditated knowledge.
Being lost in a plane crash or a bomb attack is being in the wrong place at the wrong time. Being taken out by a professional assassin is something else entirely.
1 500 drowed on the titanic i know they were in the wrong place at the wrong time that brother of hers is a thick as two short planks to say something like that
@@roywatson8133 Perhaps, or, like Princess Diana’s bodyguard who survived the Paris crash and “could remember nothing” knows exactly who is responsible for Jill Dando’s assassination.
She knew a lot and was the presenter of crime watch.... She uncovered something that they needed to get rid of her for!!!! Her brother is a bit wierd, I really believe he is hiding something. His reaction all those years ago with the news reporter seemed very suss!!! This is a complete cover up!
It was obvious from the start that Barry George was framed, the guilty verdict was astonishing! I hope he has got or will get a huge amount of compensation for wrongful imprisonment.
As far as I'm aware he didn't get a penny. He wasn't innocent enough apparently. An outrageous miscarriage of justice in my opinion. The evidence that convicted him actually proved his innocence for me.
Jill was most likely killed by a very well trained killer. The fact that she was killed in broad day light makes it an audacious act to say the very least. What also struck me is that someone must have had her under overt or covert observation as she did not live in the home at Gowen Avenue but with her fiance. Therefore, only someone who knew she was going to be there at that time could have known to he there to kill her. As for all the theories, the only one that makes sense to me is her interest in an organized child sex ring possibly linked to some very high profile people in very high places. It sound absurd, I know, however so would the Savile sittuation some years ago hence why it was not reported. A certain Royal Prince and his ensnarmtent in what could only be an intelligence linked sting makes the possible scope of this issue limitless. What I find difflcult to understand is why this theory and her involvement has been hardly mentioned in every documentary I have seen about Jill's death and not even deemed to be worrtht of considerstion. The killer literary disapeared into thin air and even escorted detention by the hundreds of CCTV cameras we have in the UK. It was a highly professional assassin that killed Jill Dando.
She may have inadvertently given her weekly Monday morning visits to her house at Gowan avenue through close knit friends or word of mouth ( close circle of friends )even her ex partners knew where she lived and probably would've been aware of her visits too. There's also the phone hacking scandal too. Lots of permutations.
Please point out how her murder bears any hallmarks of being carried out by a well trained killer, as you claim. The planning and execution were haphazard and amateurish.
I see impulsivity & premeditation, the gun and bullet modification shows some expertise and sagacity , I'm certain he conversed with Jill firstly before shooting her at closed range. But nothing that shows any professional calming demeanor.@@stevemcelmy9354
I think we should start an immediate investigation into Channel 4. They seem to be attempting to take out journalists. They’re even about to receive a Darwin Award for accidently killing themselves and the bbc 😅
Accountants are killing the BBC by trying to appeal to a bigger and bigger audience through dumbing down and being "on trend" when historically they produced high quality programmes that appealed to a smaller audience and were very proud to do that. In fact that was the theme of some of their self promotion.
I do not for one second believe the 'wrong place, wrong time' theory and I am rather surprised that Jill Dando's brother does. She was clearly targeted and her murder was a professional hit. I believe this to be the case every bit as much now as I did then.
She was murdered by a contract killer hired by the powers-that-be because she was going to expose a pedophile ring whose members were very high profile public figures in politics, business and media. Also, only two people knew she would be arriving at her house at that time......her fiancee and her agent.
Same with Joe Cox. Jill Dando was the test run for framing an innocent man with personality disorders. But the real question is why was she hit. Find the real hit men then follow the money trail.
Have a look Richard hall ,rich planet tv , very interesting info 're the jo Cox case. Not saying he's correct ,but he picks major holes in the police investigation.
I remember the shock of all this happening. She appeared to be a lovely woman, genuine and also highly professional and hard-working. And was engaged to be married. Truly sad.
Right from the outset, we the ordinary members of the public, smelt a rat when the unfortunate patsy Barry George was seemingly conveniently fitted up despite no witness or forensic evidence but a hasty and clumsy attempt to close the case and take pressure off. Situations like that never pan out as proven by the verdict of the re-trial. All a horrific demonstration of police incompetence and a waste of our tax money.
if the person they suspected was in Portugal or Spain they would have spent millions investigating but because the suspect was from a dangerous place like Serbia they didn't quite have the same appetite..............
Police corruption at the time , lies n shady police investigation .. hmmm . I must be that guy down the road with a poster on his bedroom wall ..he looked odd !!! Lazy policing at the very least ...
Personally, this should have been looked at for years. Even when a person is jailed the case should have stayed open so further inquiries could be looked at. Jill was a good presenter and investigator journalist.
I agree with you entirely, but Hamish Campbell like many detectives are thick skinned and will not deter from their MO and admit they were wrong about Barry George, it's a weakness to the public eye. They can't afford to be second best. It'll always be he got off with a technicality etc...
No mistaken identity!! Seriously a woman who was on crime watch big in the celebrity scene knew a lot about politics and crime and celebrities at that time she was taken out for fear of what she knew, but who was it and what for that’s what we need to find out.
@@JamesBrown-qp1qt My personal opinion is that it is unlikely that Crimewatch had anything to do with it. Crimewatch had been going for years and would go on for years. Killing Jill had no effect on the show. All along I have subscribed to the Serbian theory. She was killed 3 days after the Serbian tv station was bonbed, and that that was the motive.
It was a professional hit and covered up by MI5 and the police. The big question is which country did they go out of there way to save them face. They even tried to frame someone for it. It wasn't a criminal hit or it wouldn't have been covered up the way it was.
If this is the best you can do we need to find people off the street to solve crimes and report the news! 98% of the people in the country knew this years ago! 🙄🤷🏻♂️
I watched the Netflix programme and apart from reliving the horror of what happened to Jill, what struck me is that the police officers failed to see that Barry George has additional support needs and is highly vulnerable. His life seemed chaitic, he wanted to interact with women but was only able to do so in a disordered way. This did not make him a killer. I found it shameful that after Barry George was aquitted of murder Hamish Campbellstill claims he's " guilty". This together with the fact that the case is not being actively investigated is horrendous - i thought the Met were trying to gain public trust.....
The tabloid newspapers exacerbated Barry's disorders by planting his picture of him dressed in SAS attirement just to clarify and bestow the craziness upon the public. He was fitted up perfectly. The perfect scapegoat, away from the real killer.
@@michaelbailey8729 Yes, obviously highly plausible that any senior copper is given to conspiracy given the job's acknowledged history of secret society membership
I’m so glad to see Mark William-Thomas is totally open minded and in no way led by his own theory on the case. A theory that only allows the pursuit of one line of investigation. How about going back and following all the leads and reasonable avenues of investigation that remain, which should have been done in the first place and which I have a hard time believing weren’t followed at the time.
Barry George had no motive and had no traces of blood on him. One of the most intriguing aspects is that on a residential street in London, no one heard a gunshot. Which the documentary implies a silencer was used and these are uncommon. We live in a country where access to guns is difficult, so of course this was a proffesional hit and the police targeted a local oddball. I remember seeing a documentary at the time which said that Barry George's hands shook, which although never mentioned, is evident in the new Netflix documentary when he pours a glass of milk. An innocent man was set up, found guilty by a jury and sentenced to life in prison. People need to be reminded of this when the want to bring back the death penalty.
There was NO silencer. This is a common mistake. However, the gun was used in a way to minimise sound. Half the gunpowder taken out with the gun literally at her head (so hard it created a wound).
@@joecurran2811 still sounds like someone with a great knowledge of firearms to do. The murder was obviously carried out by a confident person who knew what they were doing. Barry George was a patsy. They still won't reopen the case.
The appeal barrister was correct, it was a hit job. Barry George's IQ on display is unable even to comprehend let alone carry this out. It is a professional job.
The way she was shot bears no hallmarks of a professional hit. The assailant hung around outside her house, giving multiple witnesses the chance to see him. Plus he had no apparent means of escape. All credible profilers I've read think it was carried out by a lone wolf stalker.
The head of the police investigation Hamish Campbell remains convinced to this day that Barry George did it. In the end, he got off on a technicality that suggested there was a 1 in 100 chance that fibres from a gun could have made their way to his top pocket, and therefore the conviction was unsound. George was obsessed with Dando and owned guns. I can't argue with Campbell. I'm absolutely convinced myself that George did it.
@@davidconcannon5927it wasn't fibres, it was gunshot residue...one , microscopic particle. Certainly not enough to convict...corroborated by the FBI . There was absolutley no other hard forensic evidence against Barry George whatsoever. He is something of a retard.
No. Because the calculable odds of evidence coming from playing cards was higher, in the case of the Birmingham Six. However, I have to say, that I'm not convinced that they were innocent either. If pushed, I have a hunch that the original verdict was correct. In the terms of the Guildford Four, they were convicted upon the basis of forced confessions and no real evidence. That's an entirely different methodology of prosecution and conviction and seemed a bit, shall we say, 'iffy' from the off. If pushed, I'd say they were all rightly acquited. @@spanishpeaches2930
This was definitely a planned attack...to have such a terrible crime committed by chance is fanciful. She in my opinion was watched over time, (long lenses). She lived in two places, her home and her fiancee, so someone must have watched her movements, knowing which home she was in at which time.
@@rogkeista1 she was visiting her Fulham home regularly on a Monday morning every week. It's also important that it's likely a close-knit of friends also knew her coming and goings , also her ex partners knew where she lived. Her fiancé stayed the night there the week previously, it's possible it could've enraged the killer and precipitated his actions.
It would take the police and an intelligence agency to do that sort of surveillance. I personally think for what it's worth, is that the attack was a random opportunistic one.
@@kevinluby4783 but she only had an hour or less window time on a Monday morning. So the killer would either know this , or an opportunistic one is rather lucky . She said she was being stalked two weeks previously. Sounds premeditated.
She went to her for sale house to collect a fax from her agent, after receiving a mobile phone call that he was sending the fax to that house.@@HooDie-Trench-GoTh2022
IF I WAS THE DETECTIVE LEADING THIS INVESTIGATION I WOULD DEDUCE THE FOLLOWING: 1.THERE ARE A NUMBER OF CLUES WHICH POINT TO THE HIGH PROBABILITY THAT SOMEONE VERY CLOSE TO HER, EITHER ORDERED HER KILLING, OR PULLED THE TRIGGER, UNLESS HER PHONE HAD BEEN TAPPED; AND, BY THE WAY, WE CAN DEDUCE THAT, SINCE THE GUN-SHOT WAS NOT HEARD, IT WAS PROBABLY A PROFESSIONAL HIT-JOB USING A PROFESSIONAL-STYLE SILENCER, OTHERWISE, THERE ARE A NUMBER OF OTHER CREDIBLE ALTERNATIVE SUSPECTS OR LEADS, AS OUTLINED BELOW, HOWEVER, IT LOOKS LIKE THE SUSPECT KNEW HER OR WAS TAPPING HER PHONE BECAUSE ONLY A FEW PEOPLE KNEW HER WHEREABOUTS THAT MORNING. JILL'S WHEREABOUTS THAT MORNING WAS ONLY KNOWN BY THOSE CLOSE TO HER INCLUDING HER BOYFRIEND, AND MAYBE, FAMILY MEMBERS, OR IT COULD BE THAT SOMEONE OR AN ORGANISATION WAS TAPPING HER PHONE; AT THAT TIME, JILL WAS LIVING AT HER BOYFRIEND'S HOME AND RARELY CAME HOME TO HER FULHAM HOME, SO SHE HAD SLEPT AT HER BOYFRIEND'S PLACE IN ANOTHER PART OF LONDON; BUT HER OWN HOUSE IN FULHAM, SHE HAD ALREADY TELPHONED SOMEONE CLOSE - i.e. HER BOYFRIEND OR RELATIVE THAT SHE WAS RETURNING TO HER HOME IN FULHAM TO COLLECT SOME FAXES THAT HAD BEEN SENT TO HER. THE CCTV FOOTAGE BEFORE HER ATTACK, DOES NOT SHOW SHE WAS BEING FOLLOWED, SO WHOEVER DID THIS, I CAN DEDUCE THE HIGHLY LIKELYHOOD THAT HER KILLER KNEW HER LOCATION EXACTLY - EITHER BY SOMEONE OR ONE ORGANISATION PHONETAPPING HER, OR BY SOMEONE WHO TOOK HER CALL DIRECTLY, i.e. BY HER BOYFRIEND OF FAMILY MEMBER. 2. I CAN DEDUCE, SHE WAS NOT IN THE WRONG PLACE AT THE WRONG TIME BECAUSE, TO HER KILLER, HE KNEW EXACTLY WHERE JILL WAS, AND TO HIM, SHE WAS EXACTLY IN THE RIGHT PLACE, NOT NECCESSARILY AT THE RIGHT TIME BECAUSE WITNESSES SAW SOMEONE LURKING AND WAITING FOR SOME TIME BEFORE SHE ARRIVED. ONE THING WE CAN BE SURE OF: JILL WAS NOT, AS HER OWN BROTHER TESTIFIED TO, IN THE WRONG PLACE AT THE WRONG TIME BECAUSE: WHO WOULD EVER SAY, "SHE IS IN THE WRONG PLACE AT THE WRONG TIME" WHEN SHE IS STANDING OUTSIDE HER HOME? SO, JILL'S BROTHER'S WORDS BEGGARS DISBELIEF. 3. ALSO, SINCE JILL PARKED DIRECTLY OUTSIDE HER HOME - A SHORT WALK TO HER FRONTDOOR - WE CAN DEDUCE THAT HER KILLER HAD BEEN WAITING FOR HER, RATHER THAN FOLLOWING HER. 4. OTHERWISE, THE ALTERNATIVE SUSPECT: IF JILL WAS IN THE MIDDLE OF AN INVESTIGATION EXPOSING A CHILD PEDOPHILE RING, THIS KILLING OF JILL WAS EITHER BECAUSE SHE KNEW TOO MUCH ABOUT THE BBC OR OTHER PERPETRATORS IN THE BRITISH ESTABLISHMENT - OR ELSE - THIS MAY HAVE BEEN THE RESULT OF A FORMER LOVER OR CURRENT, i.e. A LOVER'S REVENGE. 5. THE ALTERNATIVE SUSPECT COULD BE BY ANOTHER CREDIBLE LEAD WHICH WAS FROM A CONVICTED KILLER WHO SENT A LETTER STATING HE KNEW WHO KILLED JILL, WHO SAID HE HAD BEEN PART OF AN I.R.A. CELL. 6. OTHERWISE, HER KILLING WAS A RETRIBUTION FOR 17 JOURNALISTS KILLED IN A SERBIAN T.V. NEWS OUTLET IN THE BALKANS. ESPECIALLY, WHEN WE CONSIDER THAT THE BULLET FOUND AT THE CRIME-SCENE HAD BEEN TAMPERED WITH BY SOMEONE WITH KNOWLEDGE OF FIREARMS, i.e. WHICH PEOPLE IN THE BALKANS HAVE BEEN KNOWN TO PURCHASE SUCH TAMPERED-WITH BULLETS FROM RUSSIA. 7. FOR RETRIBUTION BY CRIMINALS AND THEIR SUPPORTERS FOR HER WORK IN GATHERING EVIDENCE TO CONVICT THEM AS A CRIMEWATCH PRESENTER. It is obvious Mr. Barry George doesn’t fit the profile of Jill's killer, and it is also obvious that the METROPOLITAN POLICE have revealed themselves, again, deeply wanting, and deeply flawed in regard to Mr. Hamish's investigation of Jill Dando's death. If I had been in his shoes, one of the major leads I would have pursued was the I.R.A. lead - number 5 suspect above, of the convicted killer who had served time in prison who said he knew who killed Jill Dando, and who said that he was part of an I.R.A. cell. And also, Jill's fellow work colleguevher Holiday program - a lady said that she and Jill had both received a letter from a man who said he was going to abduct and rape them, but the lady said that she was never even interviewed or contacted by the MET. POLICE as a fellow working collegue, let alone in connection with those two letters. That shows a deep imcompetence and flaw in Mr. Hamish's investigation. WHAT IS CLEAR IS THE MET. OFFICE AHD MR. HAMISH HIMSELF FELT UNDER DEEP AND PUBLIC PRESSURE TO PUT BARRY GEORGE INTO THE FRAME OF THE KILLER TO STOP THE EMBARRASSMENT, BUT THE RESULT IS, BOTH THE CURRENT DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS AND THE METROLITAN POLICE LOOK EVEN MORE IN AN EMBARRASING POSITION. AS MARK, HERE, REVEALS IN THIS INTERVIEW, THE CURRENT DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PERSECUTIONS LIED BY SAYING THERE WERE NO CRIME PROFILING DONE ON THIS CASE AFTER BARRY GEORGE'S ARREST. DID THESE DEDUCTIONS EVER CROSS ANYONE ELSE'S MIND? PLEASE COMMENT.
If as has been said she was going to expose a high profile paedophile ring then why hasn't anyone else exposed them? Her brother's comments or lack of make me consider he's been warned off.
@londonlion5179 Rotten only alluded to what Saville was doing in one short TV interview. Dando was was the shoulder to cry on and the naive voice of reason at the BBC for young women who had had the misfortune of being on the receiving end of Savilles sleaze.
If it was a “professional” hit, how come the killer left a shell case on the door step? Unless the shell was not from the murder weapon, and as deliberately left to confuse/mislead the police.
Her ex partner of 7 years should of been looked at more before she died she gave him 35,000 he stated he didn't need it as he had tons of money in his account told police it was a gift and police believed him ..Why would she give 35,000 to her ex when she was about to be married when her ex was financially secure and wealthy
@@golden.lights.twinkle2329 The use of "of" rather than "have" is evident in a large percentage of comments on RUclips. How very depressing but typical
Also check out Simon basil too. They ended their relationship rather short, he also had expertise in gun modification and was a game warden in South Africa. He also looked like the description of the killer fleeing the scene , he knew where she lived , probably the times she was arriving. He also was built like a rugby player or soldier the description Richard Hughes described. He even looks like the e fit guy too. Also often wearing three length coats too. Suited and booted.
Of course it was a professional hit, but also police failures helped, distraction techniques such as it being a 'Serbian Hitman' even though they would have had no idea where she was staying what her routine was etc. Then the theory it was an obsessed individual(Barry George) which was another distraction technique. She wanted to be an investigative Journo, I think she may have come across something like Saville/JE/GM scenario and certain agencies thought they could keep her quiet by taking her out but as we have seen with the rise of Social Media some of it has come to light. But just look at the blanket cover up of JE black book and all the contacts in their tells you all you need to know! They won't clear Barry George because they still need a distraction technique from other possibilities and other agencies being looked into. That's why they won't clear him 100% or pay him millions in compensation.
@@leighstreet8298 that’s not true, probably some of her crime watch colleagues would have known. She may have just dropped it into the conversation accidentally by being manipulated.
Hamish Campbell was not the _first_ SIO on the case, and the man who was the first SIO had to be replaced by a "more experienced" officer when he started to address the issue of "who knew that Jill would be where she was, when she was killed?" It is simply not true that NOBODY knew, but it is true that the pool of people who might have known was pretty limited (to colleagues and her fiancé), UNLESS her phone was being tracked. Campbell was chosen to please the certain colleagues, who have loyally stuck up for him ever since. The phone/Blackberry tracking and eavesdropping issue has consistently been ignored by murder inquiries*. With the phones of 1999, digital but not "smart," the tracking had to be done with access to the computers running the network rather than the phone itself. It could only have been _authorised_ by a senior police or MI5 officer with a warrant, but it could have be _done_ by a larger number of unknown individuals working for the companies concerned. Criminals tend to corrupt the cheapest people: phone company workers would be cheaper than senior police officers, unless a senior police officer had his own dog in the fight. *The murders of Honey and Barry Sherman in Toronto could ONLY have been committed by someone who had compromised Barry's "old fashioned" Blackberry, because they were strangled with cheap belts which had been purchased by the victims the day before they were found (touchingly, they were rather proud of the cheap belts) and only their personal trainer (who had no motive) should have known this. The killers also knew where in their mansion Barry was hiding when he realised criminals were in the house: he was being tracked. If Jill _wasn't_ being tracked, someone close to Jill (probably a colleague and not her fiancé) must have leaked her movements, perhaps unwittingly, to the killer(s).
Also dressed in a suit and three length coat with shoes . Unlikely because expediting on foot would've been extremely difficult and not thought through especially down a long road like Gowan avenue. Contract killers are well versed in average dress sense with additional attirement like conservatively touched things like beanies or motorcycle helmets etc too conceal their identity and age group. Although , she would've been on her own that morning . So the window of time was important.
Nothing new here. I remember at the time an ex. cop saying it was clearly a professional hit. The police were under pressure to get someone and focussed on Barry George.
I think the police were under so much public pressure to find the assassin, such was the popularity of Jill, that they seemed to make a centred enquiry rather than an open one which could take in many more suspects.
LIVERPOOL underworld I read somewhere that Bullet cases came from somewhere in Scotland and some were sold to to a Drugs Liverpool gang Probably nothing
I read something about 15 years ago that the people involved were household names . I won't repeat the names but one of them liked a shell suit. The other one has been banned from the house by his big brother. Also a certain charity she knew was dodgy.
M15 killed her Richard D Hall has a documentary on you tube if you want to know why. They're nit protecting us they're killers like the CIA and mossad.
I watched an independant decumetary about this a couple of years ago. Apparently links to the brixton bomber investigation crossed paths with crime watch. Very interesting. It put forward questions around wether the brixron bomber was allowed to carry out his attscks by the police and evidence that came in whike jill was host was key.
This is a bizarre coincidence….I was talking with my partner yesterday about a fictional tv series drama we were watching, in which a solution to a character problem could have been solved by an assassination (in the story…to be clear) and I said a random unknown shooter could probably pull it off like in the real shooting of Jill Dando years ago! And here we are a day later, and the Dando shooting is suddenly in my YT feed….That is uncanny imo.
Why would a professional hitman use a replica gun modified in a workshop to do what the original does, knowing that it could explode in his hands and kill himself?
@@andersondasilva1334 technicality ,as far as I recall.........one minute spot of blood in his. pocket,....which his defence claimed was thru contamination,....during examination..so thinking he did it is not the same as beyond reasonable doubt,.....very American ........the. f b i think Oswald , wel. lim sure you know the rest..
No blood spot. It was gun-shot residue, a single particle, from possible police contamination. Read: Stand Against Injustice by Michelle Diskin Bates, everything is in there. I wrote it and I’m his sister.
Ironically Suzy's car was found adjoining Jill's road . In Stevenage road I believe. Ironically the same road the elusive range rover driver was seen driving erratically in Jill's reconstruction on crime watch .
@@margaret-yr6uh yes, especially one specific photo where she's wearing a similar coat that Jill Dando was wearing when she was shot. The irony is creepy.
Every murder is a human tragedy, including the mass murders inflicted on the peaceful living peoples of the former Yugoslavia. This was a shock to the people of Britain and especially those who profess to protect us from harm. With the most powerful eavesdropping facility in the West, who could infiltrate and harm us? This murder was committed by a professional assassin and obviously the suspect must be from our adversary at this time, for reasons mentioned at the time. All other ideas were red herrings but once the atrocity had been successfully carried out those responsible for protecting our borders used the distractions to their advantage. A murderer able to commit his crime and escape Scot free is almost as despicable as the crime itself
Her brother is on a planet of his own! Random stabbing and robbery, maybe, but, randomly taken down to the ground, single bullet through the head, no robbery!! Apparently the pistol had been modified (re-activated), not your average I'm going to go out and randomly kill someone today scenario, plus how does an ordinary person get hold of 9mm ammo. A criminal or assassin are far more likely to be the perpetrator. I find it hard to work out how her brother would even come to that conclusion, has he been threatened, or members of the family.
There was a war between the Bosnia and Croatia the RAF bombed a crucial radio station and killed several civilians Jill execution was revenge and yes it did put a nation into mourning she was a jewel
I think so much got overlooked in the Netflix series. This was CLEARLY a professional hit. They spent so much time reviewing footage looking thru CCTV for images of Dando being followed. However...they overlook the obvious. She did not need to be followed if the killer knew where she was going to be and was laying in wait. It would have taken mere seconds. I believe that there was so many red herrings thrown at this early on. The Blue Range Rover that was described rather well but yet no plate #. I believe personalities within the BBC may have been involved. Media is a very controlled state. There are elements of media that are acting as smoke screens for politicians as well as organized crime. Quite positively...the answer to the murder of Jill Dando may have been right at the feet of the police from day one. For example...the whole situation with the man in the coat running from the scene seems like it was meant to hook the police and lead them to follow a ghost situation. In the CCTV footage...Jill Dando is at a fax office supply place...a business place of sorts. She looks like she is frustrated...almost like she is being led around from place to place (purposely) like someone she trusted was directing her towards ending up at her eventual location to be hit. God knows the killer....God has seen their face. God saw the trigger pulled. God saw it all go down. God knows WHY and HOW and WHO. God gives us free will to decide the paths we choose to take. Her killer was a coward and will forever be a coward. Apparently the mention of the $35,000.00 that she loaned to a colleague who then said they really did not need it....leads one to ask...."Did an unaware Jill Dando accidentally finance her own hit believing the money was for something all together different?" Saville? Epstein and Maxwell? Soros? Clinton? Wounded birds still fly together.
Interestingly, one of the suspects dad of Stephen Lawrence killer threatened witnesses with a gun to stay quiet. He also knew Kenneth noye. Both had similar hand guns that were mentioned on crime watch reconstruction on jill. A browning short 9mm , both had an axe to grind with crime watch. Noye even may have had one of the witnesses killed in the Stephen Cameroon case too. Both drove land rovers / range rovers . That were seen parked and driving erratically. Food for thought , although I'm convinced it was somebody Jill was intimate with like an ex partner tbh .
She was shot just after the Crime Watch programme focusing on the London Bomber, Copeland. Some one called in and gave info pointing to the fact he was being handled by a shady government agency. The ultra right faction he joined was already infiltrated by state agent provocateurs (probably started by them). Low IQ easily manipulated a perfect patsy, This theme runs again with Barry George, and the later framing of the man found guilty in the shooting of Jo Cox. Copeland didn't have the brains to make a bomb, just as Barry George didn't have the brains to get his hands on a gun and then doctor the bullets. Dando's co host was already a long time government asset going back to his student union days at the University of Belfast.
Its fishy, no proper trail all , strict media block out of the trail, video footage does n't add up. had a different colour hat on walks different to the person that shot the woman. Had no access to getting a gun same as Barry George low IQ a loner.contradicting eye witness the list goes on and on. I can't say 100% but the whole trail, and eye witness statements contradict. Why, ? Panama Files Brexit and being to close to Soros, A law firm connected with him gave her the files. The why is speculation, but the blame put on the patsy is paste and copy of Copeland (London bomber) and Barry George in many ways. Try find out or visit the man found guilty or what prison he is held in. Oh and the Nazi stuff found at his house was only found like a few months after his charge mmmmm... .. @@cmorris4418
Wow this mirrors the case against 14 year old Luke Mitchell accused of murdering his girlfriend Jodi Jones in 2003. SIO Craig Dobbie led a flawed investigation and went after Luke, ignoring people who warranted investigation. Luke has been in prison for almost 20 years despite there being no forensic evidence against him. Plenty of full DNA profiles of other males (including semen and blood of Jodi’s sister’s boyfriend) present at the scene and on the body. Dobbie and his team didn’t consider this important!
From what I saw of the documentary it made it clear she rarely returned to her house...so surely the question is...who knew she was about to turn up that day?
@@davidlutton8772Well Mark williams thomas has had access to the evidence in this case and concluded it wasn't Barry George so it's good enough for me
@@davidlutton8772 Again you must have missed what Mark said the jury found Barry George guilty because of a miniscule amount of gunpowder residue inside his coat pocket which was later found to have been contained by police you should look into the case more and just be open minded on the professional hit line of thinking
@ben597 I don't think u understand the 2 court cases. Barry George was never found not guilty or cleared. That's why he is not eligible for compensation
It’s not about the individual who killed her but who had her killed. Defiantly a pro hit for what I believe she was working on,and the possibility of exposing some high ranking figures in public life for what they done or doing.
@GOogs i agree i heard at the time she had a file on JSav and was about to expose him and others , makes sense .
Whoever did this knew where she lived. Knew when she was away from home filming and knew when she was at home. Who could possibly know all this amount of detail ?
Bollocks. She was not a journalist, she didn't expose anyone. She was just a Diana-alike presenter. Another BBC Norman. That's why the press get so het up about her murder, she was Establishment with a very big capital E. If she had been anyone else this story would have faded away. She was either mistaken for someone else or she was just killed for being famous. No mystery, no scandal, just another sad death.
Only two people knew she would be at her house at that time.....her fiancee and her agent
.She was murdered by a contract killer hired by the powers-that-be because she was going to expose a pedophile ring whose members were very high profile public figures in politics, business and media.
She was about the blow the lid on a VIP pedo ring, so she was silenced by the state security services Jill was also a very good investigative journalist. The long and short of it is, this case will never be solved because they dont want it solved.
any evidence for that...?
Spot on! Cases are never solved when the special agencies are involved!
@@ontheslide2339 He's wrong in my opinion she saw something on crime watch and actually read part of it so M15 as usual murdered her. Want proof? Richard D Hall documentary on you tube
My memory is sketchy now, but I remember thinking that at the time.
I don't buy that. All of that information would not have solely been in her head, to be obliterated by a bullet. She worked with a team - a huge team, given her profile. The information, if it existed, would have been on file and accessible to her team. Though she is described as an "investigative journalist" she didn't go around with a magnifying glass looking for clues like Sherlock Holmes - her team would have done all the legwork. She was the pretty, talented public face of the investigation (if there was one). Any explosive information would have come to light regardless of her death.
I remember this case. Barry George was obviously shoehorned into the frame from the start. And are we going to swallow one of the most famous faces in the country was mistaken for someone else in a 'wrong place, wrong time' scenario? The only real question is: who was she and her team investigating just before the murder? There's your motive.
She was investigating high profile you know what and she was got at
My cousin was actually in with him and said everyone knew he didn’t do it, he was just a weirdo and should of been in Broadmoor (I think it’s called) if anything but he deffo didn’t have it in him to kill, a harmless weirdo which isn’t a crime.
Check out Jon Wedger on this topic. They took him off finding pedos as he found too many… they get about on barges and Rosie and Jim type dolls on them have a meaning!!!!!
My husband, Tommy, worked at HMP Parkhurst for almost all his time as a Prison Officer, and he was told by a prisoner on A Wing that Jill Dando had been taken out by a professional hitman because she was involved in an investigation into serious sex offences committed by establishment figures, including some at the BBC. This was told to my husband on A Wing during the summer of 2001, and the prisoner even said that the word on the street in London was that was a Serb hit team that had been hired to kill Jill Dando.
Didn't she give files of her investigation to the BBC management before she was murdered?🤔
Could she have been on the trail of Jimmy S. and his powerful friends and this was a warning to the British media to watch where they tread ?
My initial reply to this comment seems to have been automatically deleted even though I had put the link in 4 bits. Let's try another way without my opening rant, lol;
(link is in 5 bits with each bit in inverted commas)
''bit'', then ''chu'' and then ''te.'' (there is a dot at the end of the te) and then ''com/video'' and then ''/RqxntJKCahFN/''
Higher up the food chain i think much higher after all weve a well known individual giving 12 million hush money to a woman hes never met not a word from msm but russel brands crucified for things hes admitted to and apologised for
Or something to do with the dirty monarchy
She was investigating an elite paedophile ring at the time that included some very high profile politicians and celebrities.
@magahatatheist1838 Let's look at the numbers. Jill is murdered in 1999. How many years did Jimmy's 'career' and charity-focused public profile continue after that time? (My memory is shot - I'm struggling to recall whether Jimmy was exposed while still alive?)
It is highly likely that the security services know exactly who did it and why.
Information is power.
I bet they was involved
@@ryanseager7347 If that were the case It would be highly classified therefore we will never know except for perhaps a 'death bed confession' at some point in the future.
@@Johlibaptist 'Information' is used to manipulate certain people and keep them in line.
M15 took Gill out
As a retired police officer, the first rule in an enquiry is, let the evidence lead the enquiry to the suspect. Never mould the evidence to fit the suspect. That is a sure well documented method of discrediting the enquiry. Maybe not immediately but, years later after innocent people have served time. Even if the suspect is the offender, flawed investigations are always shown to be flawed. The innocent serve time while the guilty walk to commit further crimes.
The Police are corrupt at the core, that's the problem. The Police are run by gangsters.
''the first rule in an enquiry is, let the evidence lead the enquiry to the suspect. Never mould the evidence to fit the suspect.''.. That sums up the Lucy Letby case.
@@rogkeista1 "I'm Evil I did this. I killed them on purpose".....
So true
Also never judge a book by its cover when they're are much more covert insidiously devious titles that have camouflage writing.
The round or bullet used to kill her was found to have had half of the black powder propellant charge (gunpowder) removed as to minimise the noise of firing, prior to the firing of the round. This hinted at the time, that the murder was committed by a professional.
No one heard a gun shot. Regular bullets make a lot of noise. So what you said makes total sense. Number 1: reducing the amount of propellant by half where the bullet is still lethal at close range but does not make enough noise to attract attention. Number 2: Only 1 bullet was used. Number 3: She was killed immediately after getting out of her car and approaching her house arriving home from her fiance's house. Somebody was studying her routine, following her, or waiting for her. It was just too surgical to be a random nut case.
Silencer ! ?
@orlas5861 don't silencers leave recognisable marks on the bullet?
the fact it had a silencer immediately rules out barry george....it was a pro job
the man heard the scream but not gun shot
Wrong place at the wrong time, ? My arse , she was deliberately shot at her doorstep.
Who else was expected on her doorstep other than Jill ?
Today I think if Prince Andrew mentioned his ‘ Friends’ he could end up like Jill Dando RIP Jill 🌷
And since then how many politicians..sirs.. football and gymnastics coaches have been outed as the worst of the worst peedies ..how did Saville keep getting away with it..she new about the circle.
So why are you watching this channel Dan reported in the media only a few days ago is still under investigation and this channel GBnews is monitoring the allegations BBC stated 5 days ago ..
Savile.
Savile would've sung like a canary had he been questioned, royals, MPs, police commissioners, other celebs, and of course, BBC executives would've been taken down with him...they had to protect him.
@@golden.lights.twinkle2329 you actually correcting my spelling of that fecking monster..did it upset you.
saville was protected by the royals etc
She was investigating a paedophile ring at the BBC that also included politicians and famous celebrities . This was a professional hit and it seems very strange her brother washes over this and says it's a random murder.
He's been threatened and paid to cover this up
I'd be looking at the brother, if he doesn't want justice there must be a reason, I doubt money would make him say it was random. How would anyone approach him offering money without creating suspicion or not knowing if he would speak out about a bribe. I wonder where the brother is now? And what his opinion would be today?
She wasn't investigating anything. She was just a presenter. Even if she was she wouldn't have been doing it on her own.
@@doctor_gibbo1392so why was cliff Richard sent to try to stop her from talking about it, if it wasn't happening, then when he failed to stop her they killed her.
Oh come on....she was on Crime Watch and received first-hand information. @@doctor_gibbo1392
Hamish Campbell is the problem in this case, he has a proven record of blundering high profile cases. He should be investigated himself, he knowingly had an innocent man imprisoned for 8 years of his life , to cover his own incompetence
Which other high profile cases did he blunder?
@@joecurran2811 the Yorkshire Ripper, he was replaced. He was also on the Madeline McCann case. I’m fairly certain there were more.
Rachel Nickle where they did the same as Barry George and fitted up Colin Stagg@@joecurran2811
She got too close to evil
One of the most shocking and sad cases in British criminal history.
Who or why, is still not answered even with the very high profile victim, and a seemingly extensive investigation. RIP Jill.
It was OBVIOUSLY a professional hit FFS. Anyone who thinks otherwise is totally asleep. I fully woke up 2yrs earlier when TB was given control of the UK. The rest is our ugly history.
I remember Barry George. I worked at Universal records in Hammersmith and he used to come into the reception saying that he was a cousin of Freddie Mercury. We used to give him CDS and he would go. Very unthreatening guy just. The police came around and asked us questions about him. I remember saying that their was no way he woulld of or could have done that. He was just a bit odd. I told the polic that is the wrong guy he defenatly would never have done it. Hope Barry gets the justice he deserves.
Barry will get compensaton
Do you know how many people have said that convicted murders "would never have done it"?
the guys a convicted serial sex offender
Absolute rubbish.
One of the most naive things you could ever think is "he could never do it".
History is full of thousands murderers and rapists, fraudsters and thieves who "could never do it".
My view has always been that Jill was about to expose Saville as a 'Procurer' for establishment figures. Barry George was fitted up as a distraction.
Definitely
Only problem with that theory is there is nothing to back it up.
Or high level pedophile activity
Exactly, my thoughts entirely.
It's a theory unfortunately. No evidence whatsoever she was investigating anybody. Just hearsay. Remember a lot of them knew what saville was doing. But they'd never admit that. Remember when baddiel & skinner joked about saville and 12 year old girl on a comedy show back in 1996 . They knew what he was up too. Just like a lot of em . Jill was too ambitious, was climbing the ladder of stardom. Her killer was most likely an ex partner or lover. I agree Barry George was an easy scapegoat.
The treatment of Barry George was an absolute disgrace and a pathetic police omnishambles of an investigation. Shameful. He should never have spent a day in custody and deserves an ex-gratia payment of some substance.
Barry George was just looking for an alibi in his area. They subsequently turned it into something detrimental and used his Illness and photographs of him dressed in SAS attirement etc as a circus parade for tabloid newspapers to make him look as guilty and crazy as possible. They should've all apologized and compensated him.
Whilst the police were certainly incompetent and/or dishonest (probably both), George was a nasty piece of work, especially in his attitudes towards women. The police took the easy route, saying "Let's find the local weirdo/sex pest and fit them up for the murder". It wasn't hard for them to pin it on George, who had a record of stalking and previous convictions for indecent assault and attempted rape. No, he should not have been convicted of Dando's murder, but had he been less of a PoS, he wouldn't have been so easy to fit up. It's difficult to feel much sympathy for him.
@@laurieharper1526 I agree with you , he should've had more supervision and input from his family and the mental health. I guess he did after the publicity of this case. By then of course his previous actions might've been non existent.
@@laurieharper1526 Always useful to have a patsy!
The head of the police investigation Hamish Campbell remains convinced to this day that Barry George did it. In the end, he got off on a technicality that suggested there was a 1 in 100 chance that fibres from a gun shot could have made their way to his top pocket, and therefore the conviction was unsound. George was a stalker, an attempted rapist, obsessed with Dando, and owned guns. I can't argue with Campbell. I'm absolutely convinced myself that George did it. He was never proven innocent. Let it sink in. He was allowed out because of a 1% possibility that those fibres made it into his top pocket erroneously.
She knew about all the paedo rings and was working on documentary on the subject
That's what I believe as well
BINGO
Spot on
Who did she famously dance with...?
Exactly. High profile names at the BBC. That's what no ones talking about. I'm only one episode into the Netflix thing but I have no doubt it won't be mentioned.
Her brother is wrong too. Her killer knew she was visiting her house every Monday morning. That's not being in the wrong place at the wrong time that's premeditated knowledge.
Being lost in a plane crash or a bomb attack is being in the wrong place at the wrong time.
Being taken out by a professional assassin is something else entirely.
What a starnge thing for her brother to say...
1 500 drowed on the titanic i know they were in the wrong place at the wrong time that brother of hers is a thick as two short planks to say something like that
@@roywatson8133 he's not stupid, he's evasive and deliberately playing the neutral, on the fence , downplaying.
@@roywatson8133 Perhaps, or, like Princess Diana’s bodyguard who survived the Paris crash and “could remember nothing” knows exactly who is responsible for Jill Dando’s assassination.
She knew a lot and was the presenter of crime watch.... She uncovered something that they needed to get rid of her for!!!! Her brother is a bit wierd, I really believe he is hiding something. His reaction all those years ago with the news reporter seemed very suss!!! This is a complete cover up!
He is, wrong place and time,,wtf, very strange man..Could he have wanted her dead,,say if their was some inheritance coming their way.
It was obvious from the start that Barry George was framed, the guilty verdict was astonishing! I hope he has got or will get a huge amount of compensation for wrongful imprisonment.
Then someone in that circle is covering someones arse ..deffo ✌️✌️🇬🇧🇬🇧
As far as I'm aware he didn't get a penny. He wasn't innocent enough apparently. An outrageous miscarriage of justice in my opinion. The evidence that convicted him actually proved his innocence for me.
Royal family did it
He didn't get compensated, they stated he wasn't innocent enough. Well if you can ascertain that , or work that one out .
I don’t think he was framed , he is by far the most likely person who
did it.
Jill was most likely killed by a very well trained killer. The fact that she was killed in broad day light makes it an audacious act to say the very least. What also struck me is that someone must have had her under overt or covert observation as she did not live in the home at Gowen Avenue but with her fiance. Therefore, only someone who knew she was going to be there at that time could have known to he there to kill her. As for all the theories, the only one that makes sense to me is her interest in an organized child sex ring possibly linked to some very high profile people in very high places. It sound absurd, I know, however so would the Savile sittuation some years ago hence why it was not reported. A certain Royal Prince and his ensnarmtent in what could only be an intelligence linked sting makes the possible scope of this issue limitless. What I find difflcult to understand is why this theory and her involvement has been hardly mentioned in every documentary I have seen about Jill's death and not even deemed to be worrtht of considerstion. The killer literary disapeared into thin air and even escorted detention by the hundreds of CCTV cameras we have in the UK. It was a highly professional assassin that killed Jill Dando.
She may have inadvertently given her weekly Monday morning visits to her house at Gowan avenue through close knit friends or word of mouth ( close circle of friends )even her ex partners knew where she lived and probably would've been aware of her visits too. There's also the phone hacking scandal too. Lots of permutations.
Please point out how her murder bears any hallmarks of being carried out by a well trained killer, as you claim. The planning and execution were haphazard and amateurish.
I see impulsivity & premeditation, the gun and bullet modification shows some expertise and sagacity , I'm certain he conversed with Jill firstly before shooting her at closed range. But nothing that shows any professional calming demeanor.@@stevemcelmy9354
@@stevemcelmy9354In your opinion then, Jill's murderer was the work of an amlature?!
@@garryharriman7349 yes
I think we should start an immediate investigation into Channel 4. They seem to be attempting to take out journalists. They’re even about to receive a Darwin Award for accidently killing themselves and the bbc 😅
there to busy doing docos on people like russell brand with heresay evidence
Get help, you’ve been brainwashed by Russel brand and his cult.
Accountants are killing the BBC by trying to appeal to a bigger and bigger audience through dumbing down and being "on trend" when historically they produced high quality programmes that appealed to a smaller audience and were very proud to do that. In fact that was the theme of some of their self promotion.
I do not for one second believe the 'wrong place, wrong time' theory and I am rather surprised that Jill Dando's brother does. She was clearly targeted and her murder was a professional hit. I believe this to be the case every bit as much now as I did then.
The brother sounds like a bit of a Tim Nice but.....
Agreed
She was murdered by a contract killer hired by the powers-that-be because she was going to expose a pedophile ring whose members were very high profile public figures in politics, business and media. Also, only two people knew she would be arriving at her house at that time......her fiancee and her agent.
Wrong place" her home, wrong time, home time?
Maybe her brothers life was threatened to keep his mouth shut .
Same with Joe Cox. Jill Dando was the test run for framing an innocent man with personality disorders. But the real question is why was she hit. Find the real hit men then follow the money trail.
You saying the guy convicted of Joe Cox murder is innocent?
@@cmorris4418
ABSOLUTELY.
Have a look Richard hall ,rich planet tv , very interesting info 're the jo Cox case.
Not saying he's correct ,but he picks major holes in the police investigation.
@@paulhealy5245 thanks will do
Thomas Mair was GUILTY GUILTY GUILTY GUILTY GUILTY a TERRORIST and must never leave prison EVER. Same for David Copeland
I remember the shock of all this happening. She appeared to be a lovely woman, genuine and also highly professional and hard-working. And was engaged to be married. Truly sad.
There was nothing new in the Netflix documentary! 😏
Just about to get married. Somebody objected it seems.
Right from the outset, we the ordinary members of the public, smelt a rat when the unfortunate patsy Barry George was seemingly conveniently fitted up despite no witness or forensic evidence but a hasty and clumsy attempt to close the case and take pressure off. Situations like that never pan out as proven by the verdict of the re-trial.
All a horrific demonstration of police incompetence and a waste of our tax money.
they do it all the time...some are lucky and get out but others such as michael stone will probably die in prison
if the person they suspected was in Portugal or Spain they would have spent millions investigating but because the suspect was from a dangerous place like Serbia they didn't quite have the same appetite..............
yep, freemasons in government did this
The trial produced exactly the result they wanted. The lone nut patsy.
It was obviously a professional hit, from the start.
@@EllanaWolf Troll.
Professional Hit Job indeed, and professionally covered up no doubt.
Police corruption at the time , lies n shady police investigation .. hmmm .
I must be that guy down the road with a poster on his bedroom wall ..he looked odd !!! Lazy policing at the very least ...
' po lice corruption at the time'?? In the met??? Corruption has never gone away!! They're sacking 60 a month due to this disease!!
I have always believed this was on Orders to kill her
How evil he must be to kill a defenceless woman, he's got to be an assassin with no feelings and paid a lot of money
A brutal bstard
And a coward.
Personally, this should have been looked at for years. Even when a person is jailed the case should have stayed open so further inquiries could be looked at. Jill was a good presenter and investigator journalist.
I agree with you entirely, but Hamish Campbell like many detectives are thick skinned and will not deter from their MO and admit they were wrong about Barry George, it's a weakness to the public eye. They can't afford to be second best. It'll always be he got off with a technicality etc...
No mistaken identity!! Seriously a woman who was on crime watch big in the celebrity scene knew a lot about politics and crime and celebrities at that time she was taken out for fear of what she knew, but who was it and what for that’s what we need to find out.
@JamesBrown-qp1qt Have any links with the Maxwell family ever been thrown up?
@@comealongcomealong4480 what’s the maxwell family to do with this ? Never heard of a link
She was just a presenter, one of many on that show. The theory won't wash.
@@cdeford2 she was the main presenter and do you think she was mistakenly assassinated??
@@JamesBrown-qp1qt My personal opinion is that it is unlikely that Crimewatch had anything to do with it. Crimewatch had been going for years and would go on for years. Killing Jill had no effect on the show. All along I have subscribed to the Serbian theory. She was killed 3 days after the Serbian tv station was bonbed, and that that was the motive.
It was a professional hit and covered up by MI5 and the police. The big question is which country did they go out of there way to save them face. They even tried to frame someone for it. It wasn't a criminal hit or it wouldn't have been covered up the way it was.
If it was a professional hit, we all know the government is very good at this and getting away with it
If this is the best you can do we need to find people off the street to solve crimes and report the news! 98% of the people in the country knew this years ago! 🙄🤷🏻♂️
these 3 documentaries didn't add anything to the story
I watched the Netflix programme and apart from reliving the horror of what happened to Jill, what struck me is that the police officers failed to see that Barry George has additional support needs and is highly vulnerable. His life seemed chaitic, he wanted to interact with women but was only able to do so in a disordered way. This did not make him a killer. I found it shameful that after Barry George was aquitted of murder Hamish Campbellstill claims he's " guilty". This together with the fact that the case is not being actively investigated is horrendous - i thought the Met were trying to gain public trust.....
The tabloid newspapers exacerbated Barry's disorders by planting his picture of him dressed in SAS attirement just to clarify and bestow the craziness upon the public. He was fitted up perfectly. The perfect scapegoat, away from the real killer.
Chaitic?
@@gaynor1721 chaotic
hamish is dodgy
@@michaelbailey8729 Yes, obviously highly plausible that any senior copper is given to conspiracy given the job's acknowledged history of secret society membership
I’m so glad to see Mark William-Thomas is totally open minded and in no way led by his own theory on the case. A theory that only allows the pursuit of one line of investigation. How about going back and following all the leads and reasonable avenues of investigation that remain, which should have been done in the first place and which I have a hard time believing weren’t followed at the time.
They should definitely re-open the case…what’s The Met’s excuse for not doing so?
Because the BBC were involved to protect their golden boy. Jimmy Saville! The BBC will be protected forever. 😒
Barry George had no motive and had no traces of blood on him. One of the most intriguing aspects is that on a residential street in London, no one heard a gunshot. Which the documentary implies a silencer was used and these are uncommon. We live in a country where access to guns is difficult, so of course this was a proffesional hit and the police targeted a local oddball. I remember seeing a documentary at the time which said that Barry George's hands shook, which although never mentioned, is evident in the new Netflix documentary when he pours a glass of milk. An innocent man was set up, found guilty by a jury and sentenced to life in prison. People need to be reminded of this when the want to bring back the death penalty.
There was NO silencer. This is a common mistake. However, the gun was used in a way to minimise sound. Half the gunpowder taken out with the gun literally at her head (so hard it created a wound).
@@joecurran2811 still sounds like someone with a great knowledge of firearms to do. The murder was obviously carried out by a confident person who knew what they were doing. Barry George was a patsy. They still won't reopen the case.
Yes a sad one He was a harmless local simpleton who lived in a fantasy world !
The appeal barrister was correct, it was a hit job. Barry George's IQ on display is unable even to comprehend let alone carry this out. It is a professional job.
The way she was shot bears no hallmarks of a professional hit. The assailant hung around outside her house, giving multiple witnesses the chance to see him. Plus he had no apparent means of escape. All credible profilers I've read think it was carried out by a lone wolf stalker.
The head of the police investigation Hamish Campbell remains convinced to this day that Barry George did it. In the end, he got off on a technicality that suggested there was a 1 in 100 chance that fibres from a gun could have made their way to his top pocket, and therefore the conviction was unsound. George was obsessed with Dando and owned guns. I can't argue with Campbell. I'm absolutely convinced myself that George did it.
@@davidconcannon5927it wasn't fibres, it was gunshot residue...one , microscopic particle. Certainly not enough to convict...corroborated by the FBI . There was absolutley no other hard forensic evidence against Barry George whatsoever. He is something of a retard.
@@davidconcannon5927Would you have been absolutely sure about the Birmingham Seven or the Guildford Four ?
No. Because the calculable odds of evidence coming from playing cards was higher, in the case of the Birmingham Six. However, I have to say, that I'm not convinced that they were innocent either. If pushed, I have a hunch that the original verdict was correct.
In the terms of the Guildford Four, they were convicted upon the basis of forced confessions and no real evidence. That's an entirely different methodology of prosecution and conviction and seemed a bit, shall we say, 'iffy' from the off. If pushed, I'd say they were all rightly acquited.
@@spanishpeaches2930
This was definitely a planned attack...to have such a terrible crime committed by chance is fanciful. She in my opinion was watched over time, (long lenses). She lived in two places, her home and her fiancee, so someone must have watched her movements, knowing which home she was in at which time.
only two people knew she would be arriving at her house at that time......her fiancee and her agent.
@@rogkeista1 she was visiting her Fulham home regularly on a Monday morning every week. It's also important that it's likely a close-knit of friends also knew her coming and goings , also her ex partners knew where she lived. Her fiancé stayed the night there the week previously, it's possible it could've enraged the killer and precipitated his actions.
It would take the police and an intelligence agency to do that sort of surveillance. I personally think for what it's worth, is that the attack was a random opportunistic one.
@@kevinluby4783 but she only had an hour or less window time on a Monday morning. So the killer would either know this , or an opportunistic one is rather lucky . She said she was being stalked two weeks previously. Sounds premeditated.
She went to her for sale house to collect a fax from her agent, after receiving a mobile phone call that he was sending the fax to that house.@@HooDie-Trench-GoTh2022
IF I WAS THE DETECTIVE LEADING THIS INVESTIGATION I WOULD DEDUCE THE FOLLOWING:
1.THERE ARE A NUMBER OF CLUES WHICH POINT TO THE HIGH PROBABILITY THAT SOMEONE VERY CLOSE TO HER, EITHER ORDERED HER KILLING, OR PULLED THE TRIGGER, UNLESS HER PHONE HAD BEEN TAPPED; AND, BY THE WAY, WE CAN DEDUCE THAT, SINCE THE GUN-SHOT WAS NOT HEARD, IT WAS PROBABLY A PROFESSIONAL HIT-JOB USING A PROFESSIONAL-STYLE SILENCER, OTHERWISE, THERE ARE A NUMBER OF OTHER CREDIBLE ALTERNATIVE SUSPECTS OR LEADS, AS OUTLINED BELOW, HOWEVER, IT LOOKS LIKE THE SUSPECT KNEW HER OR WAS TAPPING HER PHONE BECAUSE ONLY A FEW PEOPLE KNEW HER WHEREABOUTS THAT MORNING. JILL'S WHEREABOUTS THAT MORNING WAS ONLY KNOWN BY THOSE CLOSE TO HER INCLUDING HER BOYFRIEND, AND MAYBE, FAMILY MEMBERS, OR IT COULD BE THAT SOMEONE OR AN ORGANISATION WAS TAPPING HER PHONE; AT THAT TIME, JILL WAS LIVING AT HER BOYFRIEND'S HOME AND RARELY CAME HOME TO HER FULHAM HOME, SO SHE HAD SLEPT AT HER BOYFRIEND'S PLACE IN ANOTHER PART OF LONDON; BUT HER OWN HOUSE IN FULHAM, SHE HAD ALREADY TELPHONED SOMEONE CLOSE - i.e. HER BOYFRIEND OR RELATIVE THAT SHE WAS RETURNING TO HER HOME IN FULHAM TO COLLECT SOME FAXES THAT HAD BEEN SENT TO HER. THE CCTV FOOTAGE BEFORE HER ATTACK, DOES NOT SHOW SHE WAS BEING FOLLOWED, SO WHOEVER DID THIS, I CAN DEDUCE THE HIGHLY LIKELYHOOD THAT HER KILLER KNEW HER LOCATION EXACTLY - EITHER BY SOMEONE OR ONE ORGANISATION PHONETAPPING HER, OR BY SOMEONE WHO TOOK HER CALL DIRECTLY, i.e. BY HER BOYFRIEND OF FAMILY MEMBER.
2. I CAN DEDUCE, SHE WAS NOT IN THE WRONG PLACE AT THE WRONG TIME BECAUSE, TO HER KILLER, HE KNEW EXACTLY WHERE JILL WAS, AND TO HIM, SHE WAS EXACTLY IN THE RIGHT PLACE, NOT NECCESSARILY AT THE RIGHT TIME BECAUSE WITNESSES SAW SOMEONE LURKING AND WAITING FOR SOME TIME BEFORE SHE ARRIVED.
ONE THING WE CAN BE SURE OF: JILL WAS NOT, AS HER OWN BROTHER TESTIFIED TO, IN THE WRONG PLACE AT THE WRONG TIME BECAUSE:
WHO WOULD EVER SAY, "SHE IS IN THE WRONG PLACE AT THE WRONG TIME" WHEN SHE IS STANDING OUTSIDE HER HOME?
SO, JILL'S BROTHER'S WORDS BEGGARS DISBELIEF.
3. ALSO, SINCE JILL PARKED DIRECTLY OUTSIDE HER HOME - A SHORT WALK TO HER FRONTDOOR - WE CAN DEDUCE THAT HER KILLER HAD BEEN WAITING FOR HER, RATHER THAN FOLLOWING HER.
4. OTHERWISE, THE ALTERNATIVE SUSPECT: IF JILL WAS IN THE MIDDLE OF AN INVESTIGATION EXPOSING A CHILD PEDOPHILE RING, THIS KILLING OF JILL WAS EITHER BECAUSE SHE KNEW TOO MUCH ABOUT THE BBC OR OTHER PERPETRATORS IN THE BRITISH ESTABLISHMENT - OR ELSE - THIS MAY HAVE BEEN THE RESULT OF A FORMER LOVER OR CURRENT, i.e. A LOVER'S REVENGE.
5. THE ALTERNATIVE SUSPECT COULD BE BY ANOTHER CREDIBLE LEAD WHICH WAS FROM A CONVICTED KILLER WHO SENT A LETTER STATING HE KNEW WHO KILLED JILL, WHO SAID HE HAD BEEN PART OF AN I.R.A. CELL.
6. OTHERWISE, HER KILLING WAS A RETRIBUTION FOR 17 JOURNALISTS KILLED IN A SERBIAN T.V. NEWS OUTLET IN THE BALKANS. ESPECIALLY, WHEN WE CONSIDER THAT THE BULLET FOUND AT THE CRIME-SCENE HAD BEEN TAMPERED WITH BY SOMEONE WITH KNOWLEDGE OF FIREARMS, i.e. WHICH PEOPLE IN THE BALKANS HAVE BEEN KNOWN TO PURCHASE SUCH TAMPERED-WITH BULLETS FROM RUSSIA.
7. FOR RETRIBUTION BY CRIMINALS AND THEIR SUPPORTERS FOR HER WORK IN GATHERING EVIDENCE TO CONVICT THEM AS A CRIMEWATCH PRESENTER.
It is obvious Mr. Barry George doesn’t fit the profile of Jill's killer, and it is also obvious that the METROPOLITAN POLICE have revealed themselves, again, deeply wanting, and deeply flawed in regard to Mr. Hamish's investigation of Jill Dando's death.
If I had been in his shoes, one of the major leads I would have pursued was the I.R.A. lead - number 5 suspect above, of the convicted killer who had served time in prison who said he knew who killed Jill Dando, and who said that he was part of an I.R.A. cell. And also, Jill's fellow work colleguevher Holiday program - a lady said that she and Jill had both received a letter from a man who said he was going to abduct and rape them, but the lady said that she was never even interviewed or contacted by the MET. POLICE as a fellow working collegue, let alone in connection with those two letters. That shows a deep imcompetence and flaw in Mr. Hamish's investigation.
WHAT IS CLEAR IS THE MET. OFFICE AHD MR. HAMISH HIMSELF FELT UNDER DEEP AND PUBLIC PRESSURE TO PUT BARRY GEORGE INTO THE FRAME OF THE KILLER TO STOP THE EMBARRASSMENT, BUT THE RESULT IS, BOTH THE CURRENT DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS AND THE METROLITAN POLICE LOOK EVEN MORE IN AN EMBARRASING POSITION. AS MARK, HERE, REVEALS IN THIS INTERVIEW, THE CURRENT DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PERSECUTIONS LIED BY SAYING THERE WERE NO CRIME PROFILING DONE ON THIS CASE AFTER BARRY GEORGE'S ARREST.
DID THESE DEDUCTIONS EVER CROSS ANYONE ELSE'S MIND? PLEASE COMMENT.
If as has been said she was going to expose a high profile paedophile ring then why hasn't anyone else exposed them?
Her brother's comments or lack of make me consider he's been warned off.
Jill Dando was making noises in the BBC about Saville. She had to go.
@londonlion5179 Rotten only alluded to what Saville was doing in one short TV interview. Dando was was the shoulder to cry on and the naive voice of reason at the BBC for young women who had had the misfortune of being on the receiving end of Savilles sleaze.
Savile.
It was Saville who pulled the trigger
@sjacrane he'd been questioned by police for murders previously so it's not a ridiculous notion.
I hope this gets solved 🙏
Brother says, wrong place at the wrong time, wow, just shows they can get to anyone 🙄
She was going to expose the truths, just like the people are being cancelled today
I hope that this detective inspectors bank account was carefully scrutinised.
If it was a “professional” hit, how come the killer left a shell case on the door step? Unless the shell was not from the murder weapon, and as deliberately left to confuse/mislead the police.
Is your suggestion that pros pick up the cases afterwards or what?
Sorry I know little of these things
One things for sure ; Someone,still out there knows who,and why !!!✌️✌️🇬🇧🇬🇧
No 💩 sherlock 😂
Whoever murdered her is destined for hell as that person hasn't come forward to repent.
Her ex partner of 7 years should of been looked at more before she died she gave him 35,000 he stated he didn't need it as he had tons of money in his account told police it was a gift and police believed him ..Why would she give 35,000 to her ex when she was about to be married when her ex was financially secure and wealthy
should have, not should of.
@@golden.lights.twinkle2329 The use of "of" rather than "have" is evident in a large percentage of comments on RUclips.
How very depressing but typical
She gave him the money because she also wanted to contribute to the house they were buying.
Also check out Simon basil too. They ended their relationship rather short, he also had expertise in gun modification and was a game warden in South Africa. He also looked like the description of the killer fleeing the scene , he knew where she lived , probably the times she was arriving. He also was built like a rugby player or soldier the description Richard Hughes described. He even looks like the e fit guy too. Also often wearing three length coats too. Suited and booted.
@HooDie-Trench-GoTh2022 Barry George never had intelligence to modify ammunition .I used to know a guy who did and he was super intelligent
Of course it was a professional hit, but also police failures helped, distraction techniques such as it being a 'Serbian Hitman' even though they would have had no idea where she was staying what her routine was etc. Then the theory it was an obsessed individual(Barry George) which was another distraction technique. She wanted to be an investigative Journo, I think she may have come across something like Saville/JE/GM scenario and certain agencies thought they could keep her quiet by taking her out but as we have seen with the rise of Social Media some of it has come to light. But just look at the blanket cover up of JE black book and all the contacts in their tells you all you need to know!
They won't clear Barry George because they still need a distraction technique from other possibilities and other agencies being looked into. That's why they won't clear him 100% or pay him millions in compensation.
@@leighstreet8298 that’s not true, probably some of her crime watch colleagues would have known. She may have just dropped it into the conversation accidentally by being manipulated.
@@leighstreet8298, he didn’t come ‘face to face’ with the killer.He was a few miles away working at Queen Charlotte’s Hospital.
Hamish Campbell was not the _first_ SIO on the case, and the man who was the first SIO had to be replaced by a "more experienced" officer when he started to address the issue of "who knew that Jill would be where she was, when she was killed?" It is simply not true that NOBODY knew, but it is true that the pool of people who might have known was pretty limited (to colleagues and her fiancé), UNLESS her phone was being tracked. Campbell was chosen to please the certain colleagues, who have loyally stuck up for him ever since. The phone/Blackberry tracking and eavesdropping issue has consistently been ignored by murder inquiries*. With the phones of 1999, digital but not "smart," the tracking had to be done with access to the computers running the network rather than the phone itself. It could only have been _authorised_ by a senior police or MI5 officer with a warrant, but it could have be _done_ by a larger number of unknown individuals working for the companies concerned. Criminals tend to corrupt the cheapest people: phone company workers would be cheaper than senior police officers, unless a senior police officer had his own dog in the fight.
*The murders of Honey and Barry Sherman in Toronto could ONLY have been committed by someone who had compromised Barry's "old fashioned" Blackberry, because they were strangled with cheap belts which had been purchased by the victims the day before they were found (touchingly, they were rather proud of the cheap belts) and only their personal trainer (who had no motive) should have known this. The killers also knew where in their mansion Barry was hiding when he realised criminals were in the house: he was being tracked. If Jill _wasn't_ being tracked, someone close to Jill (probably a colleague and not her fiancé) must have leaked her movements, perhaps unwittingly, to the killer(s).
In the middle of the day in a residential area with no escape route and close up. I doubt it
Also dressed in a suit and three length coat with shoes . Unlikely because expediting on foot would've been extremely difficult and not thought through especially down a long road like Gowan avenue. Contract killers are well versed in average dress sense with additional attirement like conservatively touched things like beanies or motorcycle helmets etc too conceal their identity and age group. Although , she would've been on her own that morning . So the window of time was important.
Nothing new here. I remember at the time an ex. cop saying it was clearly a professional hit. The police were under pressure to get someone and focussed on Barry George.
What had she uncovered that made her such a threat?
Killed by the establishment.
Who are the establishment?
Barry George and any wrongly convicted person sent to prison should get £1000,000 per year for every year spent in prison.
He was taken off the streets and rightly so. He was a convicted sex offender
I think the police were under so much public pressure to find the assassin, such was the popularity of Jill, that they seemed to make a centred enquiry rather than an open one which could take in many more suspects.
It was open wasn't it? They just drew Barry George out of the hat after a year
Someone powerful wanted her dead.
LIVERPOOL underworld
I read somewhere that Bullet cases came from somewhere in Scotland and some were sold to to a Drugs Liverpool gang
Probably nothing
LIVERPOOL drugs gang link to Jill Dando
Gangsters
John Hasse Paul Bennet
Found iin Covert police opp
I read something about 15 years ago that the people involved were household names . I won't repeat the names but one of them liked a shell suit. The other one has been banned from the house by his big brother. Also a certain charity she knew was dodgy.
So....Savile, Andrew and Childline?
I always thought she may have found out about Jimmy Savile and was going to go public on Crime watch.Maybe some big names were involved too
If someone paid for her murder, that reduces the number of perpetrators to a much smaller number.
I agree and think it was murder for hire.
M15 killed her Richard D Hall has a documentary on you tube if you want to know why. They're nit protecting us they're killers like the CIA and mossad.
@@sharkbaitblu who do you think hired her murderer and why?
@@TheBobbymcdMaybe someone who benefited financially if she died..She had a home and money etc..I wonder who her benefisheries were in her will....
I watched an independant decumetary about this a couple of years ago. Apparently links to the brixton bomber investigation crossed paths with crime watch. Very interesting. It put forward questions around wether the brixron bomber was allowed to carry out his attscks by the police and evidence that came in whike jill was host was key.
This is a bizarre coincidence….I was talking with my partner yesterday about a fictional tv series drama we were watching, in which a solution to a character problem could have been solved by an assassination (in the story…to be clear) and I said a random unknown shooter could probably pull it off like in the real shooting of Jill Dando years ago! And here we are a day later, and the Dando shooting is suddenly in my YT feed….That is uncanny imo.
Your phone, tablet, Alexa etc are listening to your conversations
Why would a professional hitman use a replica gun modified in a workshop to do what the original does, knowing that it could explode in his hands and kill himself?
I couldn't agree with you more. It certainly has a personal and intimate feel about it. Premeditated & impulsivity too.
She died because of what she was planning on exposing.
Not true
why no compensation for Barry george
@@andersondasilva1334 technicality ,as far as I recall.........one minute spot of blood in his. pocket,....which his defence claimed was thru contamination,....during examination..so thinking he did it is not the same as beyond reasonable doubt,.....very American ........the. f b i think Oswald , wel. lim sure you know the rest..
No blood spot. It was gun-shot residue, a single particle, from possible police contamination.
Read: Stand Against Injustice by Michelle Diskin Bates, everything is in there. I wrote it and I’m his sister.
@@alpiekaarspeck of gunpowder residue, not blood.
@@angiemchale23 thanks for the correction
They need fresh, investigative eyes to look at this case. Hamish is fixated...
Would this murder be anything to do with prince Andrew,and what she found at the time?
What about suzy Lamplugh?.....disappeared in the 1980s..never been found... unbelievably sad..
What about countless missing children who nobody seems to care about unless its Madeleine McCann.
Ironically Suzy's car was found adjoining Jill's road . In Stevenage road I believe. Ironically the same road the elusive range rover driver was seen driving erratically in Jill's reconstruction on crime watch .
@@margaret-yr6uh yes, especially one specific photo where she's wearing a similar coat that Jill Dando was wearing when she was shot. The irony is creepy.
Yes this case could be solved with the right officers
Barry has never been compensated for the eight years he has lost.
Every murder is a human tragedy, including the mass murders inflicted on the peaceful living peoples of the former Yugoslavia. This was a shock to the people of Britain and especially those who profess to protect us from harm.
With the most powerful eavesdropping facility in the West, who could infiltrate and harm us? This murder was committed by a professional assassin and obviously the suspect must be from our adversary at this time, for reasons mentioned at the time. All other ideas were red herrings but once the atrocity had been successfully carried out those responsible for protecting our borders used the distractions to their advantage. A murderer able to commit his crime and escape Scot free is almost as despicable as the crime itself
Her brother is on a planet of his own! Random stabbing and robbery, maybe, but, randomly taken down to the ground, single bullet through the head, no robbery!! Apparently the pistol had been modified (re-activated), not your average I'm going to go out and randomly kill someone today scenario, plus how does an ordinary person get hold of 9mm ammo. A criminal or assassin are far more likely to be the perpetrator. I find it hard to work out how her brother would even come to that conclusion, has he been threatened, or members of the family.
Once the police "found" their loner to carry the can, the police investigation stopped.
We conspiracy theorists knew this was a professional hit.
Fixation in one person same as the Yorkshire ripper case
Amazing how quickly comments are censored here 😂
@markriding1267 Happening more and more frequently.
There was a war between the Bosnia and Croatia the RAF bombed a crucial radio station and killed several civilians Jill execution was revenge and yes it did put a nation into mourning she was a jewel
This is my theotlry at the time and it seemed to me at the time because of the effect it had on all of us absolute shocking
This was a professional hit by someone very high up
Using an amateur gun?
I think so much got overlooked in the Netflix series. This was CLEARLY a professional hit. They spent so much time reviewing footage looking thru CCTV for images of Dando being followed. However...they overlook the obvious. She did not need to be followed if the killer knew where she was going to be and was laying in wait. It would have taken mere seconds. I believe that there was so many red herrings thrown at this early on. The Blue Range Rover that was described rather well but yet no plate #. I believe personalities within the BBC may have been involved. Media is a very controlled state. There are elements of media that are acting as smoke screens for politicians as well as organized crime. Quite positively...the answer to the murder of Jill Dando may have been right at the feet of the police from day one. For example...the whole situation with the man in the coat running from the scene seems like it was meant to hook the police and lead them to follow a ghost situation. In the CCTV footage...Jill Dando is at a fax office supply place...a business place of sorts. She looks like she is frustrated...almost like she is being led around from place to place (purposely) like someone she trusted was directing her towards ending up at her eventual location to be hit. God knows the killer....God has seen their face. God saw the trigger pulled. God saw it all go down. God knows WHY and HOW and WHO.
God gives us free will to decide the paths we choose to take. Her killer was a coward and will forever be a coward. Apparently the mention of the $35,000.00 that she loaned to a colleague who then said they really did not need it....leads one to ask...."Did an unaware Jill Dando accidentally finance her own hit believing the money was for something all together different?"
Saville? Epstein and Maxwell? Soros? Clinton? Wounded birds still fly together.
Seems like a professional hit job to me who was Jill talking about on Crime watch UK in the 6 months before the killing?
Get a grip. Utter nonsense.
More importantly who was she going to be talking about in the future.
Cliff (kitty)Richard
she was covering the case of the NF the far right guy Copeland
Interestingly, one of the suspects dad of Stephen Lawrence killer threatened witnesses with a gun to stay quiet. He also knew Kenneth noye. Both had similar hand guns that were mentioned on crime watch reconstruction on jill. A browning short 9mm , both had an axe to grind with crime watch. Noye even may have had one of the witnesses killed in the Stephen Cameroon case too. Both drove land rovers / range rovers . That were seen parked and driving erratically. Food for thought , although I'm convinced it was somebody Jill was intimate with like an ex partner tbh .
How easy it is to waste someone on the quiet when they want too.
The scene of crime was completely compromised right from the start.
The type of firearm used doesn’t indicate a professional hit.
They act with impunity.
I always feel like she was going to blow the whistle on the BBC or atleast jimmy saviles involvement with it.
Cannot say fairer than that it should be reopened.
West Yorkshire police did exactly this. Fixation with a Geordie guy when it was a complete red herring. But wouldn't let go
She was shot just after the Crime Watch programme focusing on the London Bomber, Copeland. Some one called in and gave info pointing to the fact he was being handled by a shady government agency. The ultra right faction he joined was already infiltrated by state agent provocateurs (probably started by them). Low IQ easily manipulated a perfect patsy, This theme runs again with Barry George, and the later framing of the man found guilty in the shooting of Jo Cox. Copeland didn't have the brains to make a bomb, just as Barry George didn't have the brains to get his hands on a gun and then doctor the bullets. Dando's co host was already a long time government asset going back to his student union days at the University of Belfast.
Wot the guy convicted of Jo Cox murder is innocent?honest question
Its fishy, no proper trail all , strict media block out of the trail, video footage does n't add up. had a different colour hat on walks different to the person that shot the woman. Had no access to getting a gun same as Barry George low IQ a loner.contradicting eye witness the list goes on and on. I can't say 100% but the whole trail, and eye witness statements contradict. Why, ? Panama Files Brexit and being to close to Soros, A law firm connected with him gave her the files. The why is speculation, but the blame put on the patsy is paste and copy of Copeland (London bomber) and Barry George in many ways. Try find out or visit the man found guilty or what prison he is held in. Oh and the Nazi stuff found at his house was only found like a few months after his charge mmmmm... .. @@cmorris4418
Barry George didn't kill Jill...she was about to expose Cliff Richard n Lord Grade ..elm Lodge ...
She's was gonna expose the BBC, Saville, cliff Richard etc
Barry George should sue Hamish Campbell for slander
He's probably afraid to. Campbell is a dangerous man. 😮
Wow this mirrors the case against 14 year old Luke Mitchell accused of murdering his girlfriend Jodi Jones in 2003. SIO Craig Dobbie led a flawed investigation and went after Luke, ignoring people who warranted investigation. Luke has been in prison for almost 20 years despite there being no forensic evidence against him. Plenty of full DNA profiles of other males (including semen and blood of Jodi’s sister’s boyfriend) present at the scene and on the body. Dobbie and his team didn’t consider this important!
🙏
A professional wouldn't have left a shell casing .
That's not correct as Professional killer's have been known to leave the gun at the scene
From what I saw of the documentary it made it clear she rarely returned to her house...so surely the question is...who knew she was about to turn up that day?
Her boyfriend.
Why did george say he wasn't the guy in the picture holding the gun.?
Bazza was innocent!
I'm not so sure
@@davidlutton8772Well Mark williams thomas has had access to the evidence in this case and concluded it wasn't Barry George so it's good enough for me
@@ben597 a jury had access to the evidence and concluded he was guilty. As I said, I'm not so sure
@@davidlutton8772 Again you must have missed what Mark said the jury found Barry George guilty because of a miniscule amount of gunpowder residue inside his coat pocket which was later found to have been contained by police you should look into the case more and just be open minded on the professional hit line of thinking
@ben597 I don't think u understand the 2 court cases. Barry George was never found not guilty or cleared. That's why he is not eligible for compensation