Pretty good for an OLD kit! Airfix 1/24 Scale Hawker Hurricane Mk.1 - Unboxing Review

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 24 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 203

  • @alantoon5708
    @alantoon5708 Год назад +7

    When Airfix made this kit they had excellent drawings for the Hurricane.
    I have the recent 1/48 Hurricane I which is also excellent.
    This was a great model for 50 years ago.

  • @chrispacer4231
    @chrispacer4231 Год назад +6

    Where does one put a large model of that size to display…
    I got a 1/24 P - 51 mustang for CHRISTMAS…
    I thought It was HUGE …
    I built it and hung it from my bedroom ceiling…
    I enjoyed watching this, brought back a good memory
    Actually, the kit was from
    MPC MODELS…
    They had the license to manufacture AIRFIX KITS…
    GOOD REVIEW…
    CHRIS from OHIO 🇺🇸

    • @ModelMinutes
      @ModelMinutes  Год назад +1

      I'm not sure where I am going to put this when it is finished lol

  • @robertbate5790
    @robertbate5790 Год назад +2

    Built one of these kits at first release in my late teens. Beautiful kit to build, and a great resulting finish. Sadly long lost in the mists of time. Very fair review I thought too, thanks 👍👍👍👍

  • @jonmccormick602
    @jonmccormick602 Год назад +2

    I’m just getting back into modelling now that I’m retired (and I’m afraid guitars and Prog Rock took over from modelling in the 70s for me!) but I do have a stash of the original 1/24th scale “Super Kits” including this one. All of the original models were accompanied at the time by a book you could buy written by Roy Cross and Gerald Scarborough, the “Classic Aircraft and how to model them” series. I still have all of these books too. This one was particularly good as the modelling part showed how to remove a large number of the fuselage panels and to scratch build the tubular structure for the fuselage, adding in all of the pipe work, cables etc. Not much of a secondary accessories market in 1973! I’ll definitely be interested in this build.

    • @ModelMinutes
      @ModelMinutes  Год назад

      Wow that sounds like a fun project, can’t say I’ve seen those books but opening the panels would be interesting

    • @Danzo1957
      @Danzo1957 Год назад

      I remember those books. The detailing described would make this into a fantastic model, way beyond my resources at the time.

  • @kenmorris2228
    @kenmorris2228 Год назад +5

    This is a lovely kit. It goes together well and builds to an impressive model . I bought an aftermarket Sutton harness for the cockpit which looks really impressive. If I have any criticism, it would be the rubber tyres. I would have preferred plastic ones.

  • @potrzebieneuman4702
    @potrzebieneuman4702 Год назад +3

    7:59 I bought his in 1983 when i was in he UK and you're correct about the motor. It was the same motor Mechanno used in their Dinky range of aircraft and they were a flick start motor, the motor was located inside the Merlin. They did this by making a 2 pole motor with only 1 fixed magnet so the motor wouldn't start on it's own, it had to be started manually like an old WW1 rotary engine. These motors are made out of unobtainium, I'm looking for a couple for my Dinky planes. The tyres on mine have cracked and are misshapen from age and Airfix told me they can't replace them.

    • @diecastrescue3597
      @diecastrescue3597 Год назад +1

      A good source for those motors on ebay are wrecked dinky Sea King helicopters

    • @harryspeakup8452
      @harryspeakup8452 Год назад +1

      Much superior 1/24 Hurricane aftermarket wheels and tyres are available in cast resin by Barracuda. You can buy them at Hannants online store

    • @potrzebieneuman4702
      @potrzebieneuman4702 Год назад

      @@diecastrescue3597 thnks for the heads up, I'll look into that.

    • @ModelMinutes
      @ModelMinutes  Год назад +1

      I think that perhaps there could be some aftermarket resin replacements for the wheels somewhere

  • @stuff31
    @stuff31 6 месяцев назад +1

    No idea if you've still got this in your stash, but if you do then I would LOVE to see you build it. It would probably be some ludicrously big saga spread across like three videos, but I would watch every second of it. I love big kits, and I love vintage kits, and I don't think there are any super in-depth videos on this model on RUclips right now! Your vids are super interesting and I'm sure you'd have a lot to say about this as you build it. It would be amazing!

    • @ModelMinutes
      @ModelMinutes  6 месяцев назад +1

      Thanks! I would love to build this one soon, but sadly have had no time 🫠

    • @stuff31
      @stuff31 6 месяцев назад +1

      @@ModelMinutes Maybe some day soon! I will eagerly be clicking when I see it uploaded.

  • @Gremlins_Modelling_Mayhem
    @Gremlins_Modelling_Mayhem Год назад +4

    Thanks for the review Matt. Interesting B scheme from an historical perspective that it's the aircraft of the person Princess Margaret wanted to marry but was not allowed to.

    • @ModelMinutes
      @ModelMinutes  Год назад +1

      That is interesting!

    • @jaws666
      @jaws666 Год назад

      @@ModelMinutes never built anything this big....only do 1/72 due to space restrictions but would like to some day.

  • @seanstar69
    @seanstar69 Год назад +2

    Mate...I got mine about 5 months ago,I had a dig through the box because of the loose parts it was immediately put in the loft. I know it's all in there but it put me off starting it. If you decide to build 6 I'll get mine back out and build alongside you as you go along.

    • @ModelMinutes
      @ModelMinutes  Год назад

      awesome! Maybe towards the end of the year I will find time to start this one

  • @PasstheDalek
    @PasstheDalek 3 месяца назад

    I built one 20 years ago. I have two in stock!.Great kit. Undercarriage a bit fiddly though.

  • @bluegirl77777777
    @bluegirl77777777 Год назад +1

    Another nice kit to build is the monogram phantom mustang in 1/32, where the body and wings are made of clear plastic . It comes with 2 electrical motors, one for the prop and one for undercarriage

    • @ModelMinutes
      @ModelMinutes  Год назад +1

      I have heard about that one, sounds really fun!

  • @martinsearle714
    @martinsearle714 Год назад +2

    Its a nice kit, went together well I built it around 5yrs back. Fit is really good and you can leave the gun covers on but unglued they hold in tight enough and can be removed. The old style sprues always tend to loose parts as they aren't proper frames but the bag is there to catch the parts. Its one of the better old 1/24 airfix kits but the Stuka was the best one IMO. Pity they haven't re-released the FW190 1/24th scale as yet.

  • @Harikejn
    @Harikejn Год назад +3

    Very excellent review as well dear friend.
    I can say one thing here: That is one big model kit as well.
    And since you mentioned that it is repacking from the 70's, I also have one model kit from the 70's. I have a Gazelle helicopter also from Airfix. Only difference is that the scale of the model kit is in 1/72 as well.
    And speaking of Gazelle helicopter, do you know if the Airfix made some other Gazelle helicopters in the meanwhile? I ask cause of curiosity as well.

    • @ModelMinutes
      @ModelMinutes  Год назад +1

      Hmm, i'm not aware of any gazelle helicopters from Airfix in recent times, have you taken a look at scalemates.com ?

    • @Harikejn
      @Harikejn Год назад

      @@ModelMinutes I see. I haven't tried that. But still thanks for the help as well.

  • @jeff88701
    @jeff88701 Год назад +1

    Omg matt I remember building this kit in 70s a very nice kit for its age 👍🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿

  • @paulnutter1713
    @paulnutter1713 Год назад +2

    I got mine for £30 a few year ago from Debenhams of all places, think I'll be in a box before it gets out of its own

    • @ModelMinutes
      @ModelMinutes  Год назад

      fingers crossed you find time to build it soon :D

  • @stephenogden5470
    @stephenogden5470 Год назад

    I remember building this kit when it first came out when I was about 13 year old, and it was an impressive kit.

  • @natalebabbo-gunplaanddioramas
    @natalebabbo-gunplaanddioramas Год назад +1

    Nice review. I was able to get hold of the original 1973 version of this kit from ebay at a reasonable price. I look forward to your build and get inspiration for my built of the same kit.

  • @PeterPan-iz1kk
    @PeterPan-iz1kk Год назад

    I built this model when I was about twelve years old, about forty years ago now, and it came out really nice.

  • @iankingsley2864
    @iankingsley2864 Год назад

    Fun review, thanks Matt 👍. Big kit and looks straightforward to build. I like your idea of displaying it with a 1/72 version, that would look nifty.

    • @ModelMinutes
      @ModelMinutes  Год назад

      yeah, i think that would be a good representation of scale :D

  • @ElaineProudfoot-n1h
    @ElaineProudfoot-n1h 4 месяца назад

    I just finished building this kit for thr second rime. The only difference is that I built it as a mk 2c .I used the 20mmcannons from the 1/24th scale Mosquito and it worked out well.

  • @neilhaas
    @neilhaas Год назад +2

    I only needed four more of those Hawker Hurricanes models. Nice kit & decals too. Fought against the Luftwaffe planes the Luftwaffe itself. ❤️🤗😁😀👍🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇩🇪

  • @andrewdrabble8939
    @andrewdrabble8939 Год назад +1

    I've got that very same kit in the stash. I bought mine for £20 or £30 from The Works a couple of years back

  • @pabloer3
    @pabloer3 Год назад +2

    lindo unboxing, interesante kit, lo pondre en mi lista de buscados, saludos desde Argentina

  • @neilhaas
    @neilhaas Год назад +2

    Nice model kit review Matt. Famous fighter plane of the RAF Hawker Hurricane Mk 2 I like this model fighter plane. I have two Hawker Hurricanes very nice. 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧❤️👍🤗😁😀👍

  • @MillwalltheCat
    @MillwalltheCat Год назад

    I built this kit about 30 years ago, and bashed it into a Sea Hurricane without too much bother.
    It's still well worth the time and effort to bulid, and its age and price holds up to some newer offerings.

  • @jasonmussett2129
    @jasonmussett2129 Год назад +1

    I think I' d use resin wheels, but yeah, I' d love to build this kit again. I was fifteen when I first built this

    • @ModelMinutes
      @ModelMinutes  Год назад +2

      that's a good idea - resin might be better - but I i build it "wheels up" i suppose it won't matter too much

  • @DansModelBench
    @DansModelBench Год назад +3

    It was a very nice kit for its day, but that day has certainly passed. The molds are old and tired, there are fit issues around the cowling and the detail can't match newer offerings like Airfix's own 1:48 Hurricane. The Spitfire got a new tooling and the Hurricane certainly deserves the same in this scale.

    • @ianbeale2527
      @ianbeale2527 Год назад

      I remember it being on sale in Ian Allen for only £30. The guy behind the counter told me it was because of the left fuselage being warped along with flash that made it impossible to fit the cowling.They had a few of them for sale. Needless to say I passed on it. Bought the Trumpeter 1/24 Hurricane instead at £45. Well worth the money.

    • @hawnyfox3411
      @hawnyfox3411 Год назад

      @@ianbeale2527 = That "left fuselage being warped" remark you made....
      Does that mean "just the one you looked at", or, does it relate to ALL of them (being warped ?)
      I've never opened mine up - (still factory-sealed, bought from Debenhams for £29.00)
      Being LARGE it's put-by for my retirement phase, due to family members & lack of house space
      Mine was/is "in the Red box" (circa 2015), not the 'Vintage Classic' boxing

    • @ianbeale2527
      @ianbeale2527 Год назад +2

      @@hawnyfox3411 It definitely was warped on the one I looked at. The guy from Ian Allen said that's why they were discounted to £30 as they'd had buyers bring them back complaining.
      I also saw a review here on RUclips going in to more detail. After seeing this review, I tried to look for it, but can't seem to find it. However, I have come across a build where the builder has built it up really nicely, but can't seem to fit the cowlings.
      BUT, it may have just been a bad batch.

    • @timorvet1
      @timorvet1 Год назад +1

      @@ianbeale2527 The top part of the engine cowlings needs to be thinned down with a grinding tool so it sits flush with the fuselage and also a bit of sanding and clean up of the frame work. Having done that it made the world of difference.

    • @ModelMinutes
      @ModelMinutes  Год назад

      I'm not sure they would re-do the hurricane, at least not a mark1

  • @MrVolvobloke
    @MrVolvobloke Год назад +1

    I remember building that one with a fictitious desert scheme !

  • @elebeu
    @elebeu Год назад

    I just picked up this kit at a hobby shop this morning for $10. It is the original release by MPC and is an open box, missing the instructions and decals but complete otherwise. I'm hoping that this and other videos will assist me in the construction.

    • @ModelMinutes
      @ModelMinutes  Год назад

      The MPC version is the same kit but a rebox of the Airfix tooling. $10 is a great price though

  • @allgood6760
    @allgood6760 Год назад +1

    Nice one mate👍.. we do have a Hawker Hurricane at MOTAT... here in NZ👍✈️🇳🇿

  • @michaelcampin1464
    @michaelcampin1464 Год назад

    As it was bagged up I think you have the parts. The stand is based on the cantilever principle so it should hold the kit up without a problem

  • @peterwentworth9181
    @peterwentworth9181 Год назад +1

    Just getting back into the hobby and currently working the Airfix 1/72 Lancaster.
    Years ago l had a few real flying lessons in a Piper Warrior. Do you know of any kit manufacturers making GA aircraft?

    • @TringmotionCoUk
      @TringmotionCoUk Год назад +1

      Special hobby and valom have some and airfix has an Auster coming out soon
      Have a look on scalemates for specifics

    • @ModelMinutes
      @ModelMinutes  Год назад

      Airfix lancaster looks good! - I have the dambuster version in the stash

  • @SprueFascinationChannel
    @SprueFascinationChannel Год назад +1

    Nice review, Matt 👍

  • @FunniLookinBushy237
    @FunniLookinBushy237 Год назад +1

    Now that you have a 3D Printer, you mind doing the Henschel 129 in your Stash?

    • @ModelMinutes
      @ModelMinutes  Год назад

      I was hopeing to be able to design and print the missing parts for that one, but at the moment i have a severe lack of time to do the CAD and printing

  • @dannyliu214
    @dannyliu214 Год назад +1

    Great video and nice kit!! I think I will need a bit more bravery to tackle a 1/24 kit tho.

    • @jasonmussett2129
      @jasonmussett2129 Год назад

      Danny. I' d love a crack at the 24 th scale Stuka😀

    • @ModelMinutes
      @ModelMinutes  Год назад +1

      fingers crossed you have a go in the future!

    • @jasonmussett2129
      @jasonmussett2129 Год назад

      @@ModelMinutes I've always wanted to build the Stuka. I think it has been reissued. Hope so😀

    • @ModelMinutes
      @ModelMinutes  Год назад

      @@jasonmussett2129 yeah reissue this year

    • @jasonmussett2129
      @jasonmussett2129 Год назад

      @@ModelMinutes Thanks. I' ll start saving😀👍

  • @Clock_Tock
    @Clock_Tock Год назад +1

    Funny thing I’ve got a hawker kit on my desk but I’m currently battling tonsillitis

  • @ianbeale2527
    @ianbeale2527 Год назад

    I wonder if the moulds have been tidied up. A few years ago this kit was given a scathing review due to the one half of the fuselage being noticeably warped and the flash around the nose framing being so bad as to make it unbuildable. It was being sold off for £30 in Ian Allen , the guy behind the counter told me that people were bringing them back, the left fuselage was so bad.

    • @ModelMinutes
      @ModelMinutes  Год назад

      I think that they may have fiddled with the moulding pressures if there is less flash and warping

  • @julianmhall
    @julianmhall Год назад

    The aircraft /could/ be displayed rearming between sorties with the pilot sat in it and the gun bays open as mechanics load more ammo. That would require ground crew figures but it's a thought :)

    • @ModelMinutes
      @ModelMinutes  Год назад

      yes, it would be cool, sourcnig figures can be tough though

    • @julianmhall
      @julianmhall Год назад

      @@ModelMinutes that's what Thingiverse is for *lol*

  • @Heartofaloin
    @Heartofaloin Год назад +1

    I remember the days when you just brought them, stuck some glue and paint on them and they looked great, but now the fun has gone out of it because it become to serious

  • @ericadams3428
    @ericadams3428 Год назад +1

    From what I remember (and I bought it in 1974), the engine was too big for the cowling and the panels didn't fit properly so I displayed with the panels off.

    • @harryspeakup8452
      @harryspeakup8452 Год назад +1

      correct. The engine is actually a much better 1/24 scale representation than the one in the earlier Spitfire, but because the engine itself is the right size, given the moulding limitations which mean the cowlings have to be much thicker than scale, then the whole of the nose ends up too big. On the Spitfire they made the engine under-scale so that it fits within a scale nose.

    • @ModelMinutes
      @ModelMinutes  Год назад

      I think mine will be "flying" when i build it, so hopefully will avoid that issue

  • @markshellard5894
    @markshellard5894 Год назад +1

    Still builds
    into a nice kit

  • @trappenweisseguy27
    @trappenweisseguy27 Год назад

    I’d say their investment in the moulds has been handsomely repaid.

  • @modelmagic9930
    @modelmagic9930 Год назад +1

    Did anyone else notice Matt’s wheelie bad pun?

  • @jaws666
    @jaws666 Год назад +1

    Wonder how it compares to the new 1/24 Spitfire in terms of parts fit,detail and plastic quality.

    • @harryspeakup8452
      @harryspeakup8452 Год назад

      Poorly. It is similar to the old 1970s 1/24 Spitfire Ia, but less accurate. The new Airfix Spitfire IX is on a different planet - as is the 1/24 Trumpeter Hurricane family which first appeared in 2007.

    • @jaws666
      @jaws666 Год назад

      @@harryspeakup8452 that bad?

    • @ModelMinutes
      @ModelMinutes  Год назад

      the new spitfire blows this one out of the water

    • @jaws666
      @jaws666 Год назад

      @@ModelMinutes i would imagine so

  • @davidrose9183
    @davidrose9183 Год назад

    I ve just purchased this off ebay for 60 smackers along with spitfire m1 vintage for 65 there are others the same on there going on there 70-90 got a deal buy buying them both saved 40 quid .any tips on after market product for the cockpits only

    • @ModelMinutes
      @ModelMinutes  Год назад

      hmm, im sure that a google search might throw up some results for cockpit details

  • @bluegirl77777777
    @bluegirl77777777 Год назад

    I remember that you could put an electric motor in the engine to spin the prop , or was that the spitfire or mustang

  • @jasonmussett2129
    @jasonmussett2129 Год назад

    Ah happy memories thank you😀😀😀😀👍

  • @davidharrington1133
    @davidharrington1133 10 месяцев назад +1

    Got one to build in the stash

  • @anfieldroadlayoutintheloft5204
    @anfieldroadlayoutintheloft5204 Год назад +2

    good vid thanks lee

  • @joesanchez979
    @joesanchez979 Год назад +1

    Nice kit😃

  • @lxtechmangood9503
    @lxtechmangood9503 Год назад +1

    Ooohh tempting

  • @harryspeakup8452
    @harryspeakup8452 Год назад +1

    This one is not their finest hour due to the distorted nose and too-thick wing. Unusually, the 1/24 Trumpeter kit is very good indeed and much better than the Airfix one.

  • @lj7184
    @lj7184 Год назад

    Can you do a dapol oo scale stephensons rocket kit review please.

  • @rwd76
    @rwd76 Год назад

    I built that, or rather my father built it for me, so many, many years ago.

  • @MGB-learning
    @MGB-learning Год назад

    Great video.

  • @Rusty_Gold85
    @Rusty_Gold85 Год назад

    Its only a few years younger than me at 50 years old @1973

  • @ChristianSchroter-ok4sk
    @ChristianSchroter-ok4sk Месяц назад

    Hello mr. Min!boy!thats some plastic!with sticky greetings from Brandenburg germany.faithfully yours.your modellmate.christian

    • @ModelMinutes
      @ModelMinutes  Месяц назад +1

      Hello there! Yes, for an old kit it doesn't look too bad

  • @ninjawithfishontheback
    @ninjawithfishontheback Год назад

    how is that airfix 1/24 F6F Hellcat coming along?

  • @sweetcorn1968
    @sweetcorn1968 Год назад

    If you’re going to put a motor in it then you’d have to put LED’s in the landing lights and one in the cockpit.
    Ooh and then flashing LED’s in the exhausts and machine guns.

  • @ingosippel9653
    @ingosippel9653 Год назад

    Das ist der beste Maßstab, klasse

  • @justinblackwell9743
    @justinblackwell9743 Год назад

    My uncle built one of these in 1976 which he eventually gave to me, I swear it had a retractable undercarriage.

    • @ModelMinutes
      @ModelMinutes  Год назад

      I think the spitfire can retract the landing gear

  • @PhantomPlayzReal
    @PhantomPlayzReal Год назад +1

    Where did you get this kit?

    • @ModelMinutes
      @ModelMinutes  Год назад +1

      It was from an Airfix mystery bundle

  • @bobsmodels123
    @bobsmodels123 Год назад +1

    Not a super bad kit at all, I've seen worse (aka got Lindberg kits in my stash) 60 year old models even hold up! But I think Airfix is charging too much for this "new style kit".

  • @waynebrown3536
    @waynebrown3536 Год назад

    at least you had a bag in 73 was just in box

    • @ModelMinutes
      @ModelMinutes  Год назад

      i can imagine that was a great way to lose parts

  • @WayneWelly
    @WayneWelly Год назад +2

    That was a wheely bad pun lol

    • @ModelMinutes
      @ModelMinutes  Год назад

      lol glad you picked up on that!

    • @WayneWelly
      @WayneWelly Год назад +1

      @@ModelMinutes i pick up on them as its my humour too lol

  • @davidhinkson8856
    @davidhinkson8856 Год назад +2

    Even though it's a reissue of an old kit they could have packaged it better - what obtained in 1973 in terms of packaging really can't work today. But it looks like a good kit that can still hold it's own among newer models.

    • @ModelMinutes
      @ModelMinutes  Год назад

      yeah, some better packaging would have been good

  • @RandomPerson-bv3ww
    @RandomPerson-bv3ww Год назад +1

    If you want it to fly and it doesnt have a stand get some fishing line and some tape or a screw

  • @stevieb6173
    @stevieb6173 Год назад +1

    wow you are becoming a grumpy bear these days mate , that looks a great kit , you've been too spoiled !!!!

    • @ModelMinutes
      @ModelMinutes  Год назад

      I think it was just all the loose bits in the bag that annoyed me - I am looking forward to doing this one in the future

  • @Andy.Gledhill.Models.
    @Andy.Gledhill.Models. Год назад

    I believe this kit has fit issues, and will need work to get it up to scratch. At least they sold it at a more reasonable price of about £50. Unlike the rip off price that Airfix are charging for the 1/24 Harrier and Stuka kits.

    • @harryspeakup8452
      @harryspeakup8452 Год назад

      The Stuka however is an extremely good kit, far better than this

    • @Andy.Gledhill.Models.
      @Andy.Gledhill.Models. Год назад

      @@harryspeakup8452 The Stuka may be a decent kit. But no way is it worth the £96.99 asking price. That is more than the new 1/24 Spitfire kit. Airfix are ripping off the customer with these joke prices. You are forgetting that this kit is nearly 50 years old. It's not worth the asking price.

    • @ModelMinutes
      @ModelMinutes  Год назад +1

      I'll keep an eye out for fit problems as i build it

    • @Danzo1957
      @Danzo1957 Год назад

      You would have received change from a fiver (£5.00) for this kit in 1973.

    • @Andy.Gledhill.Models.
      @Andy.Gledhill.Models. Год назад

      @@Danzo1957 I had the original 1970's kit. Can't remember what I paid for it. But it would definitely have been more than a Fiver.

  • @PurplEWolFGaminG
    @PurplEWolFGaminG Год назад +1

    Im not jealous! at all no.. no.. not me! 😉

  • @AnthonyBrown12324
    @AnthonyBrown12324 Год назад

    I built this years ago ; the top cowling was a terrible fit . To be honest I couldn't think of a solution and gave it to my young nephews at the time ; and it gradually got demolished . Possibly the worst kit I can remember . Better to take your chances with the Trumpeter kit if you want a large scale Hurricane . The newer tool 1/48 Hurricane is a decent kit . size isn't everything .

    • @ModelMinutes
      @ModelMinutes  Год назад

      thanks for the info - i'll keep an eye out for that issue

  • @julianmhall
    @julianmhall Год назад

    Ref the tyres. During the war I doubt they would have wasted the scant rubber resources to emboss the name of the manufacturer; they didn't even have tread on the tyres in the war years.

    • @harryspeakup8452
      @harryspeakup8452 Год назад

      Treadless tyres on pre-war and WW2 types are nothing to do with saving rubber: they are because that's what works best on grass airfields. We didn't have block-tread tyres in widespread service until later in the war when hard runways were becoming more prevalent

    • @julianmhall
      @julianmhall Год назад

      @@harryspeakup8452 we didn't have treads /at all/ in the war. Like it or not, after the loss of India / Burma our sole source of raw rubber was gone and we had to conserve the limited supply that was left. Even prior to that we knew our imported supplies had to be conserved.

    • @flitsertheo
      @flitsertheo Год назад +1

      This airplane or at least its tyres could have been manufactured before the war as the scene is set in 1940. And the invasion of Burma took place way later, between December 1941 and May 1942.

    • @julianmhall
      @julianmhall Год назад +1

      @@flitsertheo I know when Burma was invaded. That's precisely /why/ I expressly said 'even later in the war' etc.

    • @memkiii
      @memkiii Год назад +1

      Then you would be wrong in doubting that fact. Check photographic references.

  • @PhantomPlayzReal
    @PhantomPlayzReal Год назад +1

    Noooooo I could of been first

  • @fearofthedark666
    @fearofthedark666 Месяц назад

    Bollocks. It's a modern reproduction of the original. Clickbait.

    • @ModelMinutes
      @ModelMinutes  Месяц назад

      how is this clickbait? I never said the entire product was old, the tooling is old. I presented an unboxing of the product shown on the thumbnail and in the title