@@GyorBox "violates roughly half of the Geneva conventions in one move" " Is Shocked when humanity is beyond enraged and nearly wipes a species off the universe"
Musket lines made sense when they were developed. They evolved from pike formations, and were suited to the technology of the time. Smoothbore muskets had relatively short range and terrible accuracy, so the only way to hit anything was for everyone to aim in the general direction of the enemy and fire in volleys, ensuring that something hit through sheer volume of fire. Single shot weapons meant you were either helpless until you reloaded or needed a bayonet to turn your musket into a spear; staying in formation meant you could copy the previous pike formation and form a wall of bayonets to repel charging cavalry trying to attack while you were reloading. Soldiers fighting as individuals were absolutely screwed when facing a disciplined line of soldiers fighting in formation. Musket lines absolutely made sense for the technology available at the time. As for battles happening in the open, that was done for several reasons: 1) it's a lot easier to form formations, see your troops and the enemy, and give orders if you can see what's happening out in the open, 2) combat in dense woods or urban areas with single-shot weapons that take a long time to reload is an absolute nightmare and nearly always devolves into hand-to-hand combat, and 3) the rules of warfare held battles away from the civilians to limit collateral damage. The defenders didn't want their civilians getting slaughtered in the middle of a battle, and the attackers didn't want to level a city/farmland with resources they could use or kill the people they intended to conquer and put to work feeding and clothing their army. The whole "hurr durr, British were stupid to stand out in the open while Americans hid behind trees and sniped them" thing is a meme. Yes, it happened, and yes, the British complained about us sniping their officers because it was ungentlemanly and dishonorable, but the overwhelming majority of battles during the American Revolution involved both sides standing in the open and firing on each other in volleys. We did the same in the Civil War, because while rifled muskets had been developed that dramatically increased the range and accuracy of the individual musket, the average soldier wasn't a sharpshooter and being limited to single-shot muzzleloaders meant that firing in volleys was still the most reliable way to hit the enemy. Modern tactics and the end of formations/lines didn't make sense until technology, namely repeating rifles and metallic cartridges, had advanced enough to make them obsolete. As for formations and volley fire in space... it still makes sense, to a degree. The more ships you have shooting at a target, the more likely you are to hit said target or to kill it quickly. That's the whole point to fleets; if your fleet breaks up into individual ships all doing their own maneuvers and fighting as individuals, it's going to get torn apart by a fleet fighting as a coordinated unit. Just the way these aliens were doing it is stupid. But if they have a set of agreed-upon rules of warfare that limit collateral damage to civilians and infrastructure, similar to our modern Hague Conventions and Geneva Conventions, then it can still make sense. "Combat has to occur in uninhabited systems, nobody is allowed to bomb planets from orbit, military forces are purely voluntary, and the side that is obviously losing must surrender and concede to the demands of the victor." Makes sense. It's how we waged war for centuries.
Hell, during the first couple years of the US Civil War, we cashiered captured soldiers, especially officers. Basically, "we don't have the facilities to keep you prisoner, so we'll let you go if you promise to go home and not fight for a few months." And people actually did it. They agreed to go home and not fight for a set period of time, and actually stuck to their word when released. Cashiering officers ended when the Union built concentration camps to shove Confederate POW's into so they could all die of typhus rather than return home and eventually rejoin the war.
Just so ya know, if you ever encounter CIWS as an acronym again... (close in weapons system) A human sailor or officer would would refer to it as the "see-wizz" Or if in a bar explaining it to a civilian... "R2 with a rage boner"
These guys were too arrogant. So arrogant they even forgot the slaughter of our home world. They were so arrogant they thought WE would forget. We corrected that little mistake.
Weep not for the stupid, lest you be crying all day. It took them 1 generation to go from tryng to wiping out humans, to arming humans and trying to make them play out their stupid war traditions.
Romans 12:19 - Don't try to get revenge for yourselves, my dear friends, but leave room for God's wrath. It is written, Revenge belongs to me; I will pay it back, says the Lord But what happens when your lords earth has been removed from the heavens? God is unable to avenge the death of his creation, so therefore revenge becomes mankind's responsibility to pay back.
The first story is what I imagine happening if the Expanse Universe ever encountered Star Wars, assuming they had high enough yields to do damage of course.
Tbh, the Nukes we have on Earth would be enough to not only disable the shields, but also destroy ISD's. And in Space, we don't have to worry about the Nukes being too strong. *Tsar Bomba at 100% noises intensify*
"there's nothing that we can't overcome with spite" and that's coming from a min who lives in a world with four different beings that rule the umbral plain and a fifth that was made not to exist.
Red or blues no mater if they fight against humanity they would be wiped out. their tactics if you can call it tactics are just STUPID. (HUGE FACEPALM) so much stupidety must really hurt.
@@artbrann Yeah no Idea from Modern Warfare and that with Weapons of Mass Destruction and Spaceships. "sighs" But it is Honorable if they die and die they will if they fight against Humanity.
@@bogustoast22none25 true but what these ADVANCED ALIENS do is so stupid that it must hurt how naive they are ? i mean really that is not a stategy or a tactic its simply stupid. if someone don't keep to their honor codes they have no chance at all and be honest we will exploid every weakness in a enemy thats just us.
Sounds like they were just performing war games like fleets do in the pacific, the human ship having a freakout and interfering while they just continued.
Plus they were just fighting each other. Its like the humans thought if they attacked the aliens would stop fighting each other to focus on them instead, and...that didn't happen. If it was written with a more comedic tone, I'd applaud the rate tone of story; alas, it seems to be incidental.
I think they got asked to help the blues and just thought it is easyer to cripple the red fleet than fighting them like the blues. Or they did it because they wanted that both hunt them to destroy them
That actually sounds like a really cool code name for this system. Because it's honestly the description is like a wizard somewhere on the boat is just waving their hand and using water that you can't see to just knock stuff away. Because the whole entire thing is just designed to swat away anything in terms of missiles right? What's the difference in between it and a point defense system that the aliens were using? Or is it just the same concept used in two different ways?
@@lornbaker1083 in the Navy it's a point defense that puts up a wall of uranium depleted rounds, design to turn an incoming missile into incoming shrapnel. 4,500 rounds per minute travelling at about 1 km per second with maybe 20 seconds of firing in the magazine. A shitload of supersonic shrapnel crashing into your hull or superstructure ain't good, but it's better than the missile itself. Other types of PDS will use missiles (like the Sea Sparrow) to try to take out an incoming missile. Slightly more range, shouldn't result in the shrapnel, but less number of times it can be used. [Keep in mind I'm relying on my memory of, shit, 25 years ago when I served. Damn, that's a lot longer than I realized.] If I understood the story correctly, the UNE ship had a way to aim their CIWS, while on USN ships it's a fully automated weapon system.
@@markuhler2664 Yes and no. To my knowledge, an operator can take manual control of a CWIS should it fail to accurately target incoming missiles and enemy aircraft. Most just remain in autonomous operation to act as point defence, because most military naval vessels can shrug off the weapons fire from a CWIS, so there’s no real point in taking manual control. However if the enemy has the space faring equivalent of 1800s British Naval Vessels, that don’t bother to take evasive action, there is nothing stopping the operator from using the CWIS to punish them for their sheer stupidity.
Xenos, you killed our home world and were so dense you forgot it. Did you think WE would forget it? We don't forget, and we're not good at forgiving either.
Back in the day it was a point of honor among various armies to not open fire before the enemy had done so. There are even recorded instances of two opposing armies passing cleanly thru each other without firing a shot and having to about face before the battle could actually start. Makes no sense to me either. And this shall be our mantra: Survival and revenge!
What's with the suprize. Elites don't give a darn about you today. Your poorly educated an informed. Why? Is Classified. 😅. Really think Isreal needs are troops? Or not realize Kamala ask Ukraine to jion NATO. That's a promise broken an Cuban military crisis in reverse. The best SF robs from history.
Honor in war makes about as much sense as trench warfare. Save the honor for paintball. This enemy wants to see you covered in something besides red paint.
On a planetary surface, such tactics might be forgivable, if laughably outdated. In space - a 3 dimensional plane, if it can even be called that - is just insulting.
A light second is 300.000 m, and the distance covered by Mach 12 in a second is 4116. At that speed, it would still take 72,88 seconds for the shot to reach the target. Or a little over one minute and 12 seconds. At a distance of 10 ls that would increase to, napkin math here, a little over 11 minutes and 22 seconds. That's a time frame where dodging would just entail moving forward and unless you were in the direct line of fire you'd avoid the projectively easily.
There are some things that are pretty standard and unchanging. First being that no matter how advanced technology becomes, we will always have a use for a simple knife. Second being, no matter how advanced technology becomes, the military brass will always make idiotic decisions.
the first things people forget are what their brain deems non important. do you remember every bug youve killed? every food youve eaten? causal genocide happens sometimes XD
@@scp7375 The biggest mistake any species could make is to underestimate humanity. What we lack in technology, strength, speed, or intellect is made up for in our collective hate. We can be in the middle of world war 3 or 4 or 5 for all anyone cares. But if an alien race decided to use that as an opportunity to prey on civilians or, God forbid, our pets. I can promise that there is no religious, political, prejudicial, or even greed based reason to not turn our scorn upon a new target. Humans are naturally the psycho asshole best friend to each other as a whole. They will treat you like shit sometimes but if anyone else does anything similar they will jump to overkill. You've probably heard of the term "othering". It's a key aspect to prejudices. And there is nothing more unifying to us than a common enemy. And on the topic of technology, hate, and intellect. Humans advanced more technologically in times of war than the equivalent amount of peace. If we view economic competition as another form of war it becomes significantly more true. Anything that had a monopoly grew stagnant. But competition forced growth. We became the dominant lifeform on a planet that had the odds stacked against us. And that concept is ingrained in our very being. We're the only prey that chooses to struggle till death. We're the only predators that chase long after losing sight of our prey.
if they frequently destroy other worlds (especially home worlds) then this might not seem out of place or particularly important. Secondly, they probably wouldn't know much about earth beyond "it is the humans' world" and wouldn't have reason to care beyond that.
I would have to presume from the fact they immediately dropped their whole argument to engage that this was not the first time that they had ever simply decided that race was not civilized enough to permit to live. Too bad though cuz unfortunately they crossed some critters that they really weren't rated for arguing with. And as they said the big difference is that the humans will not leave any left to chance.
Barely two minutes and forty seven seconds into the video and all ready the OCD gamer voice in my head is screaming the aliens are fecking idiots when it comes to fighting a space battle. And seriously if your gonna crack some ones planet like an egg, Make sure they are all kaput first.
He does that with every recording. I keep telling the algorithm to stop recomending him but it keeps shoving it in my feed. Between the jarring pace he keeps and the blatant changes this channel is shit.
@@hariman7727 just for you, I want the channel to cover something with grammar that reads like it was passed through several autotranslators. Think backstroke of the west orders of incomprehensible.
I respectfully disagree. The man who has nothing to lose lacks incentive and likely harbors a death wish. The man who has everything to lose is I feel a far more dangerous enemy.
Destroying Earth without killing every last human always seems to end poorly for them.
yup
I always love that outlook of humanity.
"Didn't wipe us out that first day/strike? Hmm... Your mistake.."
@@GyorBox "violates roughly half of the Geneva conventions in one move"
" Is Shocked when humanity is beyond enraged and nearly wipes a species off the universe"
@@Lone_Wandering0 -- Right?
"Didn't finish us? Ok then. Your mistake.."
😂
@@Lone_Wandering0 Don't forget expanding the Geneva Convention while doing it!
"Don't mind me I'm just having an aneurysm from stupidity"
"Wow I didn't think you were that stupid, sir"
TFS DBZA Vegeta and Nappa
God dammit, Nappa...
:facepalming, leaving large mark.
:"I think this guy might be the avatar"
:facepalming even harder
Tfs Universe
vegeta: 9 Minutes 18 second
Goku: what happens then?
Vegeta: happiest moment of my life.
Humanity - " I'm haunting you"
UNE tiny deployed modern remote land mines on a Napoleonic battlefield
More like a modern Sensor-fuzed cluster munition.
The actual frack? Those kind of tactics are insane on a planetary surface, let alone in space.
And we know that because we used them to death before moving on to something slightly less stupid, like charging machine guns with cavalry.
Musket lines made sense when they were developed. They evolved from pike formations, and were suited to the technology of the time. Smoothbore muskets had relatively short range and terrible accuracy, so the only way to hit anything was for everyone to aim in the general direction of the enemy and fire in volleys, ensuring that something hit through sheer volume of fire. Single shot weapons meant you were either helpless until you reloaded or needed a bayonet to turn your musket into a spear; staying in formation meant you could copy the previous pike formation and form a wall of bayonets to repel charging cavalry trying to attack while you were reloading. Soldiers fighting as individuals were absolutely screwed when facing a disciplined line of soldiers fighting in formation. Musket lines absolutely made sense for the technology available at the time. As for battles happening in the open, that was done for several reasons: 1) it's a lot easier to form formations, see your troops and the enemy, and give orders if you can see what's happening out in the open, 2) combat in dense woods or urban areas with single-shot weapons that take a long time to reload is an absolute nightmare and nearly always devolves into hand-to-hand combat, and 3) the rules of warfare held battles away from the civilians to limit collateral damage. The defenders didn't want their civilians getting slaughtered in the middle of a battle, and the attackers didn't want to level a city/farmland with resources they could use or kill the people they intended to conquer and put to work feeding and clothing their army.
The whole "hurr durr, British were stupid to stand out in the open while Americans hid behind trees and sniped them" thing is a meme. Yes, it happened, and yes, the British complained about us sniping their officers because it was ungentlemanly and dishonorable, but the overwhelming majority of battles during the American Revolution involved both sides standing in the open and firing on each other in volleys. We did the same in the Civil War, because while rifled muskets had been developed that dramatically increased the range and accuracy of the individual musket, the average soldier wasn't a sharpshooter and being limited to single-shot muzzleloaders meant that firing in volleys was still the most reliable way to hit the enemy. Modern tactics and the end of formations/lines didn't make sense until technology, namely repeating rifles and metallic cartridges, had advanced enough to make them obsolete.
As for formations and volley fire in space... it still makes sense, to a degree. The more ships you have shooting at a target, the more likely you are to hit said target or to kill it quickly. That's the whole point to fleets; if your fleet breaks up into individual ships all doing their own maneuvers and fighting as individuals, it's going to get torn apart by a fleet fighting as a coordinated unit. Just the way these aliens were doing it is stupid. But if they have a set of agreed-upon rules of warfare that limit collateral damage to civilians and infrastructure, similar to our modern Hague Conventions and Geneva Conventions, then it can still make sense. "Combat has to occur in uninhabited systems, nobody is allowed to bomb planets from orbit, military forces are purely voluntary, and the side that is obviously losing must surrender and concede to the demands of the victor." Makes sense. It's how we waged war for centuries.
Hell, during the first couple years of the US Civil War, we cashiered captured soldiers, especially officers. Basically, "we don't have the facilities to keep you prisoner, so we'll let you go if you promise to go home and not fight for a few months." And people actually did it. They agreed to go home and not fight for a set period of time, and actually stuck to their word when released. Cashiering officers ended when the Union built concentration camps to shove Confederate POW's into so they could all die of typhus rather than return home and eventually rejoin the war.
@@Swindle1984 War in a more civilized time, as the saying goes. It works right up until you fight an inferior foe who has to get creative to win.
I mean, if we're talking smoothbore muskets and not rifles, its actually a fairly optimal strategy on the ground.
Just so ya know, if you ever encounter CIWS as an acronym again... (close in weapons system)
A human sailor or officer would would refer to it as the "see-wizz"
Or if in a bar explaining it to a civilian... "R2 with a rage boner"
To be fair, there are few problems in life that cannot be solved with enough explosives.
And the only reason they weren't solved was because they didn't use enough.
@@LaughingD3mon or, on the rare occasion, too much
@@algorithmicabyss4150 there is never "too much" boom
@@algorithmicabyss4150 This man right here Inquisitor!
@@LaughingD3mon data retrieval, the cog-boys gets angry when you nuke a STC (at least before they rip all the new templates from it)
I mean..... Who cracks a planet and doesn't verify the targeted species is dead? Especially one with our track record.
A dumb and prideful one
Those guys apparently
These guys were too arrogant. So arrogant they even forgot the slaughter of our home world. They were so arrogant they thought WE would forget. We corrected that little mistake.
And then forgets they even existed, as these races apparently did with Humans...
Had heard the first one before. Am happy there was another story in universe,got real dark at the end there.
Weep not for the stupid, lest you be crying all day.
It took them 1 generation to go from tryng to wiping out humans, to arming humans and trying to make them play out their stupid war traditions.
This is how you get the Imperium of Man. Suffer not the xenos to live.
Glory is yours, but vengeance shall be mine
Romans 12:19 - Don't try to get revenge for yourselves, my dear friends, but leave room for God's wrath. It is written, Revenge belongs to me; I will pay it back, says the Lord
But what happens when your lords earth has been removed from the heavens?
God is unable to avenge the death of his creation, so therefore revenge becomes mankind's responsibility to pay back.
@@badjer4328 Ohhh, very nice.
The first story is what I imagine happening if the Expanse Universe ever encountered Star Wars, assuming they had high enough yields to do damage of course.
Actual 3d formations against a 2d formation
Tbh, the Nukes we have on Earth would be enough to not only disable the shields, but also destroy ISD's. And in Space, we don't have to worry about the Nukes being too strong. *Tsar Bomba at 100% noises intensify*
@@ravenouself4181 I’ve seen some old school calcs showed those shields could shrug off Tzar Bombas in vacuum, but in atmo you are right
It actually hurts to listen to the "strategy" in use.
Same. AND I DON'T KNOW A GOOD TACTIC IF IT PUNCHED ME! BUT I WOULD RECOGNIZE A BAD TACTIC A GOOGL PLEX LIGHTS CENTURYS AWAY!!!
We can do all things through Spite, for it strengthens us.
"there's nothing that we can't overcome with spite" and that's coming from a min who lives in a world with four different beings that rule the umbral plain and a fifth that was made not to exist.
Red or blues no mater if they fight against humanity they would be wiped out. their tactics if you can call it tactics are just STUPID. (HUGE FACEPALM) so much stupidety must really hurt.
even Nelson(and he was using/dealing with those tactics in the 1700s) would have facepalmed
@@artbrann Yeah no Idea from Modern Warfare and that with Weapons of Mass Destruction and Spaceships. "sighs" But it is Honorable if they die and die they will if they fight against Humanity.
@Yiming Wang so true even the early AI in Stellaris don't do this. :)
Here’s the thing, at least napoleonic warfare has a reason, it was to break cavalry charges that would trample and crush musketmen.
@@bogustoast22none25 true but what these ADVANCED ALIENS do is so stupid that it must hurt how naive they are ? i mean really that is not a stategy or a tactic its simply stupid. if someone don't keep to their honor codes they have no chance at all and be honest we will exploid every weakness in a enemy thats just us.
Sounds like they were just performing war games like fleets do in the pacific, the human ship having a freakout and interfering while they just continued.
Plus they were just fighting each other. Its like the humans thought if they attacked the aliens would stop fighting each other to focus on them instead, and...that didn't happen. If it was written with a more comedic tone, I'd applaud the rate tone of story; alas, it seems to be incidental.
I think they got asked to help the blues and just thought it is easyer to cripple the red fleet than fighting them like the blues. Or they did it because they wanted that both hunt them to destroy them
Team deathmatch but one guy is self aware
Stellaris warfare meets EVE tactics
Just FYI, CIWS (Close In Weapons System) is usually pronounced "Sea Wiz".
That actually sounds like a really cool code name for this system. Because it's honestly the description is like a wizard somewhere on the boat is just waving their hand and using water that you can't see to just knock stuff away. Because the whole entire thing is just designed to swat away anything in terms of missiles right? What's the difference in between it and a point defense system that the aliens were using? Or is it just the same concept used in two different ways?
@@lornbaker1083 in the Navy it's a point defense that puts up a wall of uranium depleted rounds, design to turn an incoming missile into incoming shrapnel. 4,500 rounds per minute travelling at about 1 km per second with maybe 20 seconds of firing in the magazine. A shitload of supersonic shrapnel crashing into your hull or superstructure ain't good, but it's better than the missile itself. Other types of PDS will use missiles (like the Sea Sparrow) to try to take out an incoming missile. Slightly more range, shouldn't result in the shrapnel, but less number of times it can be used. [Keep in mind I'm relying on my memory of, shit, 25 years ago when I served. Damn, that's a lot longer than I realized.]
If I understood the story correctly, the UNE ship had a way to aim their CIWS, while on USN ships it's a fully automated weapon system.
@@markuhler2664 Yes and no. To my knowledge, an operator can take manual control of a CWIS should it fail to accurately target incoming missiles and enemy aircraft. Most just remain in autonomous operation to act as point defence, because most military naval vessels can shrug off the weapons fire from a CWIS, so there’s no real point in taking manual control. However if the enemy has the space faring equivalent of 1800s British Naval Vessels, that don’t bother to take evasive action, there is nothing stopping the operator from using the CWIS to punish them for their sheer stupidity.
@@decimation9780 I can confirm the CIWS does have a manual mode.
@@markuhler2664 manual mode is for engagement of surface targets... I can confirm that it is fun to shoot!!
no one will believe me but i actualy ask for the second one to be made after lisening to the first on the "NetNarrator" channel
now you have both in a single compact package
@@AgroSquerril
That's called a petite hermaphrodite. I take two.
@@jtqthetieman if you take two, the isn't it a three way?- sorry for the bad joke but that was a golden opportunity.
@@henrypaleveda7760
Good point. How many personalities though?
@@henrypaleveda7760That you put forth
I never heard the second part of this, glad I finally found it, tha5 ending took me by surprise.
XENO DELENDA EST! Once more thank you for narrating this story Agro Squerril
a pleasure
Xenos, you killed our home world and were so dense you forgot it. Did you think WE would forget it? We don't forget, and we're not good at forgiving either.
Back in the day it was a point of honor among various armies to not open fire before the enemy had done so. There are even recorded instances of two opposing armies passing cleanly thru each other without firing a shot and having to about face before the battle could actually start. Makes no sense to me either.
And this shall be our mantra: Survival and revenge!
What's with the suprize. Elites don't give a darn about you today. Your poorly educated an informed. Why? Is Classified. 😅. Really think Isreal needs are troops? Or not realize Kamala ask Ukraine to jion NATO. That's a promise broken an Cuban military crisis in reverse. The best SF robs from history.
Honor in war makes about as much sense as trench warfare. Save the honor for paintball. This enemy wants to see you covered in something besides red paint.
On a planetary surface, such tactics might be forgivable, if laughably outdated.
In space - a 3 dimensional plane, if it can even be called that - is just insulting.
Don't know about you guys, but just the thought of Earth being destroyed is a bit overwhelming.
A light second is 300.000 m, and the distance covered by Mach 12 in a second is 4116. At that speed, it would still take 72,88 seconds for the shot to reach the target. Or a little over one minute and 12 seconds. At a distance of 10 ls that would increase to, napkin math here, a little over 11 minutes and 22 seconds. That's a time frame where dodging would just entail moving forward and unless you were in the direct line of fire you'd avoid the projectively easily.
Sigh, don't anger The Murder Primates™️ !!!!
I wonder what the space version of a box canyon would be ... #rvb
Asteroid field
Several black holes orbiting around each other?
For Humanity
For the Author(s), for the narrator Agro Squirrel, for the algorithm !!!
It's a bird!
It's a plane!
No, IT'S LOCKEED MARTIN!
-RussianBadger
Algorithm be pleased.
There are some things that are pretty standard and unchanging. First being that no matter how advanced technology becomes, we will always have a use for a simple knife. Second being, no matter how advanced technology becomes, the military brass will always make idiotic decisions.
Vengeance is mine sayith the Lord.
We are damned fine thieves sayith Humanity.
Vengeance is mine sayith the Lord.
And my children shall be my sword.
"Human, you can not blow up the whole galaxy."
"What to make a bet?
For the algorithm
And the algorithm shall answer
For the algorithm
For the Algorithm!
For the Algorithm!
Well I was always told if you are going to do a chore or job do it correctly and fully or you will have to do it over until it was done.
Damn
yup
Thank you for the reading
How does a race forget about basically wiping out earth in one generation
the first things people forget are what their brain deems non important. do you remember every bug youve killed? every food youve eaten? causal genocide happens sometimes XD
@@scp7375
The biggest mistake any species could make is to underestimate humanity. What we lack in technology, strength, speed, or intellect is made up for in our collective hate.
We can be in the middle of world war 3 or 4 or 5 for all anyone cares. But if an alien race decided to use that as an opportunity to prey on civilians or, God forbid, our pets. I can promise that there is no religious, political, prejudicial, or even greed based reason to not turn our scorn upon a new target.
Humans are naturally the psycho asshole best friend to each other as a whole.
They will treat you like shit sometimes but if anyone else does anything similar they will jump to overkill.
You've probably heard of the term "othering". It's a key aspect to prejudices. And there is nothing more unifying to us than a common enemy.
And on the topic of technology, hate, and intellect. Humans advanced more technologically in times of war than the equivalent amount of peace. If we view economic competition as another form of war it becomes significantly more true. Anything that had a monopoly grew stagnant. But competition forced growth. We became the dominant lifeform on a planet that had the odds stacked against us. And that concept is ingrained in our very being. We're the only prey that chooses to struggle till death. We're the only predators that chase long after losing sight of our prey.
if they frequently destroy other worlds (especially home worlds) then this might not seem out of place or particularly important. Secondly, they probably wouldn't know much about earth beyond "it is the humans' world" and wouldn't have reason to care beyond that.
I would have to presume from the fact they immediately dropped their whole argument to engage that this was not the first time that they had ever simply decided that race was not civilized enough to permit to live. Too bad though cuz unfortunately they crossed some critters that they really weren't rated for arguing with. And as they said the big difference is that the humans will not leave any left to chance.
For the human race, it was the most awful, horriffic years of their existance.
For this race, it was just another subjugation.
Bob the dragon
For the algorithm and the narrator.
For the algorithm
Well damn.
lol, the stupidity in this is honestly funny to a point.
some text for the AlGoRiIThM and a thanks to the narrator
harsh but fair...
Barely two minutes and forty seven seconds into the video and all ready the OCD gamer voice in my head is screaming the aliens are fecking idiots when it comes to fighting a space battle. And seriously if your gonna crack some ones planet like an egg, Make sure they are all kaput first.
Feck around and find out.
Cold
ty for story
For the fun of it
i think i just met my soulmates
savage
xenos fcking around, xenos find out
Y'all fucked up. Time to pay the bill.
You really need to read verbatim. Little errors in readings like word swaps and changed sentences really pull me out of the stories when they happen.
Humanity will carry on. Repopulate, rebuild, rejoice.
Red and Blue...........
Will be forgotten an the annuls of history.
Bah. Bad ass humans
🎉
I’m confused
For the Algorithm11!
F T A
for the algorithm
If you would actually read the words on the screen rather than constantly editorializing, you wouldn't have completely blown the ending of this story.
159th, 6 February 2023
First
Second
Eighth
S... no wait....
5800th
eleven thousandth, six hundred thirty first.
messed up the ending narration dude...c'mon bro...wtf
Inaccurate narration. Why did you omit and change words when you had them right there in the video?
He does that with every recording. I keep telling the algorithm to stop recomending him but it keeps shoving it in my feed. Between the jarring pace he keeps and the blatant changes this channel is shit.
Likely to fix grammatical errors and to help the story flow better.
I don't mind the pace, but the omissions and changed words/sentences are rather intolerable.
@@hariman7727 just for you, I want the channel to cover something with grammar that reads like it was passed through several autotranslators.
Think backstroke of the west orders of incomprehensible.
The most dangerous enemy is the one who has nothing to lose.
Don't mess with humans, they will find a way to pay you back.
I respectfully disagree. The man who has nothing to lose lacks incentive and likely harbors a death wish. The man who has everything to lose is I feel a far more dangerous enemy.
For the algorithm
For the Algorithm!