When Rover Met BMW - Episode 3: A Job for Life

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 16 окт 2024

Комментарии • 23

  • @matthewgodwin3050
    @matthewgodwin3050 Год назад +14

    Team leaders criticising keen new employees for working too quickly perfectly epitomises what finally brought Rover Group to its knees. We should and could have done so much better. Pity really. And I speak as an ex Rover Group employee, although I worked in sales rather than production.

  • @mfitzy100
    @mfitzy100 Год назад +8

    5 breaks in ten hours? Sounds good to me

    • @SentinelSays
      @SentinelSays 7 месяцев назад +1

      Shame they are normally around 10 min breaks. I speak from experience there 😅

  • @davarosmith1334
    @davarosmith1334 Год назад +10

    BMW plundered Rover , taking the new Mini and taking all the know how to make a decent 4x4 from the land rover. It's like eating all the decent flavour crisps and leaving a load of ready salted in the bag and saying here man help your self to a bag of crisps!

    • @edword7195
      @edword7195 Год назад +4

      BMW also took the Rover name

    • @MSJChem
      @MSJChem Год назад +7

      Can you blame them? BMW were losing 25 million pounds a day with Rover. The hard truth is that Rover made cars that nobody wanted to buy, not even the British public. BMW left Rover with one billion pounds which they burned through in five years and then they went bankrupt. The real crime is the Pheonix Four who left the company with a combined 40 million pounds. They were the only real winners.

    • @edword7195
      @edword7195 Год назад +1

      No can't blame, the government did not support car industry like the German, French Japanese or American. The government pretended it did not support state aid but as we have seen time and time again it does just not industry ,it just our government chose the winner to be the City rather than industry. Which may have seemed sensible at the time , in hindsight not so much

    • @mfitzy100
      @mfitzy100 Год назад +1

      That’s business I’m afraid. BMW did try but the strategy was completely misguided. The low volume 75 shouldn’t have been a priority for replacement and was the wrong car completely for the market at the time

    • @MSJChem
      @MSJChem Год назад +2

      @@edword7195 Well they bailed out British Leyland for long enough and saw that it was a colossal waste of taxpayers money.

  • @mfitzy100
    @mfitzy100 Год назад +3

    I’m beginning to see why rover cars had so many quality issues. That line operation looks terrible

    • @hamster639
      @hamster639 10 месяцев назад +1

      Well systems 1 and 2 were built for the metro and mini so were ancient. System 3 which isn't shown in this video was far more modern, a lot of Honda input as it built both honda and rover models at 60 an hour.

  • @lukedavis436
    @lukedavis436 10 месяцев назад

    I can at least thank BMW for using their much more reliable engines in the P38 making it... Less unreliable

  • @bobhooper3982
    @bobhooper3982 9 месяцев назад

    12:41 that didn’t sound good want he said 😮🤣

  • @DIMASTAMPOLHDHS
    @DIMASTAMPOLHDHS 2 дня назад

    HELP TO FACTORY ROVER PLEASEEEEEEEEEEEE 😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭☹☹😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😥😥😥😥😥😥😥😥😥😥😥😥😥😟😟😟😟😨😰😰😰😰😰😰😰😥😥😥😥😥😥😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭BEFORE I LOVE YOU ROVERS