Yes, to be killed or arrested. They have gay, women running from husband abuse, atheists who have left islam. You have been listening to news corp for too long. It is easy when you do not know them, isn't it?
Mk Ely you do know that a lot of those in detention physically and sexually assaulted staff and locals on Nauru and Manus? Where’s the justice for those who’ve been harmed by these illegals in detention?
Ok so can someones explain to me if they said the live in bad condition why some of those refugees have kids with the nauru people how is that possible .
@@paulaharte9384 and the Cologne sexual assaults, the Islamic terrorism and the fact that the German people were never asked. Sounds like appalling government to me. I think most people would rather live in Australia than Germany or indeed Western Europe.
Pure misleading propaganda using old footage and facility's no longer even used or relevant. Over 70% of refugees on Nauru live in the community, many work and some even run business. Those in the centres are free to come and go 24/7 and for quite some time (over a year at least) have lived in modern self contained bungalows complete with A/C hot running water, big flat screen TV's and other mod cons that most local Nauru people live without. The centre even has a gym and other facility's and and refugees are provided three meals a day complete with imported products including meat (well out of affordability for locals) Refugees are provided with a spending allowance, again above the average local wage. Regarding Manus again the three new centres at Manus are open centres refugees coming and going as they please and again everything they need provided at a higher standard than locals. Again all refugees also have the option of living in the community, of which a couple have chosen some even in relationships with locals, one even being married and started a family. Again as pointed out none are detained and have other options like resettlement in Cambodia or PNG countries good enough for millions of people, but not good enough for those supposedly fleeing war etc So why the misleading propaganda?
For a billion good reasons, sadly. I grew up with dumb, violent third world refugees and roomed with Indians scamming the VISA student system. Never again. Never, ever again.
I admire Australian policies to be fair.. You come illegally, you have no rights to be here.. Why oh why cant the British government implement these policies..or is someone profiteering by them coming.. I'm 61 and I don't recognise the country I lived in my all life anymore
This is a very simple problem to solve as has already been demonstrated by Australia and now Hungary, problem is either there is corruption involved and or the government has no balls to take the bull by the horns.
Great work, thanx; also, please: Sample: Please ask these questions at Kavanaugh appointment gearings: The Constitution does not mention corporations, but the Supreme Court has struck down hundreds of local, state and federal laws enacted to protect people from corporate harm based on the illegitimate premise that corporations should have Constitutional rights. Armed with these "rights," corporations wield ever-increasing control over jobs, natural assets, politicians, even judges and the law. For example, the Supreme Court has: *Prohibited routine inspections of corporate property without prior permission, even though scheduling such visits may permit a company to hide threats to public health and safety *Struck down state laws requiring companies to disclose product origins, thus preventing us from knowing what’s in our food *Prohibited citizens wanting to defend their local businesses from corporate chains encroachment from enacting progressive taxes on chain stores *Struck down state laws restricting corporate spending on ballot initiatives and referenda *Struck down federal laws limiting corporate spending in elections, opening the door to political corruption and drowning out the average American's ability to influence who serves in political office The time has arrived when a democratic litmus test should be given to all Supreme Court justice nominees on their views on corporate constitutional rights during the confirmation process. Below are a list of questions I request you ask Brett Kavanaugh in hearings and at other opportunities before the confirmation vote. And then please OPPOSE any nominee who supports corporate constitutional rights. === (Contact Move to Amend at info@movetoamend.org if you would like a PDF version of this questionnaire) You’re considered a “strict constructionist” (i.e. to literally interpret the U.S. Constitution as written). Corporations are nowhere mentioned in our constitution. How do “strict constructionists” justify anointing state-created corporations with Bill of Rights and other rights contained in the Constitution? Charters or licenses were democratic instruments once used by the public and state legislatures to define and limit corporate actions. Corporations, collections of capital and property, could not act beyond their charter provisions. Do you feel that these originally defined collections of capital and property should possess inalienable constitutional rights intended for human beings? What are inalienable constitutional rights? Who should possess them? The 14th Amendment was one of the three post civil war amendments passed to ensure equal protection for former slaves. Two decades later, the Supreme Court declared that the 14th Amendment’s equal protection rights also applied to corporations. Do you feel that the 14th Amendment framers intended the amendment to apply to corporations? Corporations won constitutional "search and seizure" rights to avoid subpoenas which may uncover corrupt financial and business practices, and to avoid health and safety inspections, and to prevent citizens and communities from stopping corporate pollution. Do you agree that corporations "search and seizure" rights should exist, which preempt the public's right to know through inspections? The 1978 First National Bank v Bellotti ruling was the first Supreme Court case granting corporations the right to influence elections. In a dissenting opinion, Justice William Rehnquist stated: “It might reasonably be concluded that [corporations], so beneficial in the economic sphere, pose special dangers in the political sphere." Do you believe that corporate money in elections poses "special dangers in the political sphere"? The Supreme Court asserted in the 2014 Hobby Lobby decision that a business corporation has religious rights. Do you believe that an entity created by the state possesses religious rights that could have the effect of discriminating against entire groups of people? The constitutional right “not to speak” has been granted to corporations to avoid listing product ingredients, even when the public health, safety and welfare may be at risk by not having the right to know. Do you feel a corporation’s constitutional so-called “right not to speak” should preempt the public’s right to protect their own health, safety and welfare? === An ever-increasing number of future Supreme Court cases are likely to concern corporations. This underlines the urgency of knowing how Supreme Court nominees view the relationship between constitutionally protected corporate rights and human rights. This issue meets the standard of a litmus test for qualification of any High Court justice nominee to becoming a public servant in our democratic republic. PLEASE OPPOSE ANY NOMINEE WHO SUPPORTS CORPORATE. Thanx.
I was a refugee from Iran in aussie for 9 years before I was able to come to germany! its saddening seeing some of these comments here and how racist it is! i will use this comment section in my rap music video coming out soon 👍
@@ridesharegold6659 I was 19 and had no clue and was fleeing for my life! And now the world is seeing the truth about Islamic regime! And the ex convicts built Australia and killed aboriginal people! Not sure why I was asking them for help! You don’t flee dictators and convicts to go ask help from other convicts who kill for land 👍 but that’s okay I busked in Australia and now I’m enjoying my life and my music here in Germany 😇
@@benyaeast4741 So you were fleeing for your life and you skipped over countries like India, Thailand, Indonesia, and Malaysia to pay someone to give you an insanely dangerous, illegal boat ride? And you did it all to try to get to a racist country you didn't want to go to anyway? Makes sense.
@@ridesharegold6659 your assumption game is 0/10 I was 19 and had no clue what was happening! My mother got me to leave Iran( have not seen what’s happening with the revolution of a 44 year old theocracy killing their own people ?) I also didn’t pay and just went for free because I was 1 guy and again I had 0 clues about politics at that time! Also Australia is a signatory of the UN which means they had to help but they didn’t because they were ex coward convicts from England 😂 I also had 0 clue about racism in Australia! I worked and paid taxes in Australia and also did busking and contributed to the community. Apart from people like you, Australian people made me feel like home and I love my Aussie friends back in Melbourne and Sydney! Also if you are very certain about your point of view why don’t come and sit down with me for a podcast ? I’m sure the world would love to see both of our points of view.
Their country - their rules. Well done Australia. I wish Europe would learn from them.
Many illegals still come to Australia.
None of them are 'detained'. All free to go back to their country of origin.
Yes, to be killed or arrested. They have gay, women running from husband abuse, atheists who have left islam. You have been listening to news corp for too long. It is easy when you do not know them, isn't it?
Mk Ely you do know that a lot of those in detention physically and sexually assaulted staff and locals on Nauru and Manus? Where’s the justice for those who’ve been harmed by these illegals in detention?
Ok so can someones explain to me if they said the live in bad condition why some of those refugees have kids with the nauru people how is that possible .
@@mkely9032take them to you house. Give them shelter.
Go home, you’re not welcome.
Well done Australia for protecting your people and your country 🇭🇲👍
Good job to germany for welcoming refugees and respecting basic human rights 🇩🇪 👍
@@paulaharte9384 and the Cologne sexual assaults, the Islamic terrorism and the fact that the German people were never asked. Sounds like appalling government to me. I think most people would rather live in Australia than Germany or indeed Western Europe.
@paulaharte9384 you're ashame to the brothel your mother works at
@@paulaharte9384bullshit, we bring all the criminals to us who are not willing to work
Many illegals still go to Australia..
Well, Sudan. Stay in Sudan.
He does not want to stay in Sudan..
Super, I hope Europe learn from Australia and keep them out.
I'm a European and I hope the eu takes Australia as an example of what not to do . May Australia burn in hell
Many illegal immigrants are still going to Australia..
Very determined economic migrants who transited through multiple safe countries.
Pure misleading propaganda using old footage and facility's no longer even used or relevant.
Over 70% of refugees on Nauru live in the community, many work and some even run business.
Those in the centres are free to come and go 24/7 and for quite some time (over a year at least) have lived in modern self contained bungalows complete with A/C hot running water, big flat screen TV's and other mod cons that most local Nauru people live without.
The centre even has a gym and other facility's and and refugees are provided three meals a day complete with imported products including meat (well out of affordability for locals)
Refugees are provided with a spending allowance, again above the average local wage.
Regarding Manus again the three new centres at Manus are open centres refugees coming and going as they please and again everything they need provided at a higher standard than locals.
Again all refugees also have the option of living in the community, of which a couple have chosen some even in relationships with locals, one even being married and started a family.
Again as pointed out none are detained and have other options like resettlement in Cambodia or PNG countries good enough for millions of people, but not good enough for those supposedly fleeing war etc
So why the misleading propaganda?
Tough crap. Nobody told you to break the law trying to illegally enter.
this video protected more than 400 people from drowning
Why come so far? go to Arab countries. Please don't cry wolf and victim, only to come and radicalize youth in these noble countries.
The comments on this video... man
For a billion good reasons, sadly. I grew up with dumb, violent third world refugees and roomed with Indians scamming the VISA student system. Never again. Never, ever again.
Six people.. is that all?
Go Australia! Good for them!
I think sending these refugees to Pluto is a good option or even Saturn
Some of them are bad people.
Pls go to Sudan
I admire Australian policies to be fair..
You come illegally, you have no rights to be here..
Why oh why cant the British government implement these policies..or is someone profiteering by them coming..
I'm 61 and I don't recognise the country I lived in my all life anymore
This is a very simple problem to solve as has already been demonstrated by Australia and now Hungary, problem is either there is corruption involved and or the government has no balls to take the bull by the horns.
Well done Australia. Hope Germany will close its borders.
Has the policy deterred others from attempting to get to Australia?
Seeing that Australia went from thousands of illegals to zero, you can be sure it has.
By putting people in detention/ prison , that’s not good for anyone living like prison style politics.!!!
Great work, thanx; also, please: Sample: Please ask these questions at Kavanaugh appointment gearings: The Constitution does not mention corporations, but the Supreme Court has struck down hundreds of local, state and federal laws enacted to protect people from corporate harm based on the illegitimate premise that corporations should have Constitutional rights. Armed with these "rights," corporations wield ever-increasing control over jobs, natural assets, politicians, even judges and the law.
For example, the Supreme Court has:
*Prohibited routine inspections of corporate property without prior permission, even though scheduling such visits may permit a company to hide threats to public health and safety
*Struck down state laws requiring companies to disclose product origins, thus preventing us from knowing what’s in our food
*Prohibited citizens wanting to defend their local businesses from corporate chains encroachment from enacting progressive taxes on chain stores
*Struck down state laws restricting corporate spending on ballot initiatives and referenda
*Struck down federal laws limiting corporate spending in elections, opening the door to political corruption and drowning out the average American's ability to influence who serves in political office
The time has arrived when a democratic litmus test should be given to all Supreme Court justice nominees on their views on corporate constitutional rights during the confirmation process.
Below are a list of questions I request you ask Brett Kavanaugh in hearings and at other opportunities before the confirmation vote.
And then please OPPOSE any nominee who supports corporate constitutional rights.
===
(Contact Move to Amend at info@movetoamend.org if you would like a PDF version of this questionnaire)
You’re considered a “strict constructionist” (i.e. to literally interpret the U.S. Constitution as written). Corporations are nowhere mentioned in our constitution. How do “strict constructionists” justify anointing state-created corporations with Bill of Rights and other rights contained in the Constitution?
Charters or licenses were democratic instruments once used by the public and state legislatures to define and limit corporate actions. Corporations, collections of capital and property, could not act beyond their charter provisions. Do you feel that these originally defined collections of capital and property should possess inalienable constitutional rights intended for human beings?
What are inalienable constitutional rights? Who should possess them?
The 14th Amendment was one of the three post civil war amendments passed to ensure equal protection for former slaves. Two decades later, the Supreme Court declared that the 14th Amendment’s equal protection rights also applied to corporations. Do you feel that the 14th Amendment framers intended the amendment to apply to corporations?
Corporations won constitutional "search and seizure" rights to avoid subpoenas which may uncover corrupt financial and business practices, and to avoid health and safety inspections, and to prevent citizens and communities from stopping corporate pollution. Do you agree that corporations "search and seizure" rights should exist, which preempt the public's right to know through inspections?
The 1978 First National Bank v Bellotti ruling was the first Supreme Court case granting corporations the right to influence elections. In a dissenting opinion, Justice William Rehnquist stated: “It might reasonably be concluded that [corporations], so beneficial in the economic sphere, pose special dangers in the political sphere." Do you believe that corporate money in elections poses "special dangers in the political sphere"?
The Supreme Court asserted in the 2014 Hobby Lobby decision that a business corporation has religious rights. Do you believe that an entity created by the state possesses religious rights that could have the effect of discriminating against entire groups of people?
The constitutional right “not to speak” has been granted to corporations to avoid listing product ingredients, even when the public health, safety and welfare may be at risk by not having the right to know. Do you feel a corporation’s constitutional so-called “right not to speak” should preempt the public’s right to protect their own health, safety and welfare?
===
An ever-increasing number of future Supreme Court cases are likely to concern corporations. This underlines the urgency of knowing how Supreme Court nominees view the relationship between constitutionally protected corporate rights and human rights. This issue meets the standard of a litmus test for qualification of any High Court justice nominee to becoming a public servant in our democratic republic.
PLEASE OPPOSE ANY NOMINEE WHO SUPPORTS CORPORATE. Thanx.
I was a refugee from Iran in aussie for 9 years before I was able to come to germany! its saddening seeing some of these comments here and how racist it is! i will use this comment section in my rap music video coming out soon 👍
People are racist because they expect you to follow the rules and not try to enter their country illegally? You sound entitled.
@@ridesharegold6659 I was 19 and had no clue and was fleeing for my life! And now the world is seeing the truth about Islamic regime! And the ex convicts built Australia and killed aboriginal people! Not sure why I was asking them for help! You don’t flee dictators and convicts to go ask help from other convicts who kill for land 👍 but that’s okay I busked in Australia and now I’m enjoying my life and my music here in Germany 😇
@@benyaeast4741 bullshit
@@benyaeast4741 So you were fleeing for your life and you skipped over countries like India, Thailand, Indonesia, and Malaysia to pay someone to give you an insanely dangerous, illegal boat ride? And you did it all to try to get to a racist country you didn't want to go to anyway? Makes sense.
@@ridesharegold6659 your assumption game is 0/10
I was 19 and had no clue what was happening! My mother got me to leave Iran( have not seen what’s happening with the revolution of a 44 year old theocracy killing their own people ?)
I also didn’t pay and just went for free because I was 1 guy and again I had 0 clues about politics at that time! Also Australia is a signatory of the UN which means they had to help but they didn’t because they were ex coward convicts from England 😂 I also had 0 clue about racism in Australia!
I worked and paid taxes in Australia and also did busking and contributed to the community.
Apart from people like you, Australian people made me feel like home and I love my Aussie friends back in Melbourne and Sydney!
Also if you are very certain about your point of view why don’t come and sit down with me for a podcast ? I’m sure the world would love to see both of our points of view.
😢 we are insane
So schlecht