@@georgelopez5139there’s no polyurethane coating on the leather so it’s naturally dyed like the SBBS. When you clean them the leather bleeds & becomes darker due to the water coming in contact with the leather but not permanently.
@@kaxtu clean what you can but the uppers (red portions) aren’t worth cleaning IMO. I tried wiping off the white portions & it started to reveal the under layer of the cracked leather on one part that was really cracked , I tried cleaning the red & it just bled into the midsole. It’s a vintage shoe to beat up so I’d honestly keep it at that.
For me, the 2015s are more sleek, the L&Fs are bigger fatter toebox from a profile point of view so I prefer the 2015s but for sure the L&Fs have the 2015 beat in many aspects
Good Vid bro nice way to point out the difference the red parts leather is definitely better on LnF but I would have to agree in any other situation I would rather have my pair nice and clean not a big fan of the pre age look either but it is what it is I was able to double up for retail and the Chicago was the only og colorway in the 1s that I was missing but now are found pun intended corny to 😂 keep going tho bro ✌🏾
Y’all hypes 😂. You know damn well the 2015 used real leather. Both shoes are covered with polyurethane so saying one absorbs and the other doesn’t is bullshit.
@@izzy6918 I prefer the 2015s but that’s my opinion. Would never pay for the resell price of a 2015 so my option would be L&Fs retails or I would get a 2015 replica
I hate how hard is to clean the lost and found because of how the water make them look !
How do they look ?
@@georgelopez5139there’s no polyurethane coating on the leather so it’s naturally dyed like the SBBS. When you clean them the leather bleeds & becomes darker due to the water coming in contact with the leather but not permanently.
@@kisaragitown3934 thanks for the info should I avoid cleaning the uppers or just clean what I have to?
@@kaxtu clean what you can but the uppers (red portions) aren’t worth cleaning IMO. I tried wiping off the white portions & it started to reveal the under layer of the cracked leather on one part that was really cracked , I tried cleaning the red & it just bled into the midsole. It’s a vintage shoe to beat up so I’d honestly keep it at that.
@@kisaragitown3934 thank for the heads up
Lost and found takes it. Agree on all your points. It is def lower in the back heel which makes it more comfortable
Thank you for this video. I been so torn on this shoe.
For me, the 2015s are more sleek, the L&Fs are bigger fatter toebox from a profile point of view so I prefer the 2015s but for sure the L&Fs have the 2015 beat in many aspects
Great comparison!! I sold my 2015’s a few years ago and I have no regrets. I’m a quality/materials guy, so L&F wins all day
lost and founds all day, but im biased cus I have em and I missed out on the 15 version...pat back droppin that heat on a consistent basis....😎
Good Vid bro nice way to point out the difference the red parts leather is definitely better on LnF but I would have to agree in any other situation I would rather have my pair nice and clean not a big fan of the pre age look either but it is what it is I was able to double up for retail and the Chicago was the only og colorway in the 1s that I was missing but now are found pun intended corny to 😂 keep going tho bro ✌🏾
🔥🔥🔥
SUBSCRIBED!
Any1 help me out sm1 selling chicagos 1ns uk 9.5 & breds uk 9 price ?
FIRE FIRE VID!!
Y’all hypes 😂. You know damn well the 2015 used real leather. Both shoes are covered with polyurethane so saying one absorbs and the other doesn’t is bullshit.
My 2015 still look like new after 1 year wear and my 2022 look beat up already after 2 months wear
@@pattonPwr should’ve passed on the lost and found since u got the 2015s which are better.
@@izzy6918 I prefer the 2015s but that’s my opinion. Would never pay for the resell price of a 2015 so my option would be L&Fs retails or I would get a 2015 replica
2015 better pair and softer for sure. Keepin it classic. But I doubled up on both just in case.