Thank you so much for this. I had to take an advanced syntax class this semester and never before had a syntax class. I just finished your series and finally understand what my lecturer is talking about. You explained everything so good. So again, thank you so much.
Just finished the series and, honestly, it helped so much! You are so elaborate and the way you explain things is super understandable, yet doesn't lack information. Great work!
Thank you so much for this. I'm taking Syntax II this term, and it's been 3 years since I took Syntax I, so having these videos as a refresher really helps and will not doubt help me throughout the semester.
your videos are life/ grades savers, it covers the basics in a simple and clear way, if I fail my exam tomorrow at least I'll have this playlist to help me study next time
I've just finished your syntax series! It really helped me a lot to understand the syntax. neat handwriting, simple but thorough explanation! I wish i knew your video when i was still in uni. i will repeat your video until i fully absorb it to my knowledge! thank you very much for your effort to share this precious knowledge! from Korea :)
Thank you for the video! I wanted to ask if you are going to do a video on subject tests. Inversion, Question tag and short answer tests seem straightfoward, but, during my syntax test, one of the sentences that we had to apply subjects tests to was ''What kinds of wrongdoing will we learn about this year?'', and that revealed to me that i still dont fully understand how do subject tests work. Also, if anyone that can help with that sentence, i'd be very glad. the thing has been eating me for weeks now.
Thank you! I'm still not clear on how to tree sentences that contain fronted constituents in X' other than Wh phrases and auxiliary verbs. For example: "Yesterday I went to the beach." Does "yesterday" move to Spec-C, to C or to something else? What if there are two fronted constituents? "Yesterday in Madrid there was a riot." Do we put "yesterday" in Spec-C and "in Madrid" in C? What if there are more than two fronted constituents: "Yesteday, in the kitchen, while doing the dishes, I saw a man out the window." ?
amazing clear explanations!! i'm in love!! I have a test on this tomorrow but i have a question about principle C (sorry you said you didn't want to talk about it): "Maria saw herself" is a grammatical sentence but surely it flouts the principle C because herself and Maria are co-indexed ..... ??? help
@@Trevtutor what if we have a sentence 'She is Maria' and here She and Maria are co-indexed and bound. It still doesnt violate principle C? I could not understand what you meant by 'if Maria is coindexed with something before it'.
“She said that he loves herself” is in Latin totally grammatical. Illa1 dixit [eum amare se1] (I co-index using numbers) This may have of course also another reading: Illa dixit [eum2 amare se2] In 1 co-indexing the reflection is said to be “indirect”; in 2 co-indexing “direct”. How could we come with a rule exposing that? I should clarify that reflexives can be used in such an ambiguous way either in finite (“full CPs”: dependent clauses of many sorts) or non-finite verb phrases (infinitives, participles, gerunds etc, thus “null CPs). Infinitives with verbs introducing indirect speech (like dicere) are considered TPs, if I’m not so wrong.
Hi TrevTutor, As for the 'What picture of himself did John like?' Would it be okay to say that the deep structure of the question still represents John c-commands himself? Your videos help me a lot!
The final sentence is grammatical because complements and adjuncts of objects of a verb X will also allow reflexive pronouns to refer to (to be coindexed with) the subject of verb X.
(That Alex always passes out after drinking orange juice irks himself) how can I explain that this sentence is ungrammatical?, and Thanks a lot for your efforts, you really make syntax a piece of cake!🤍🤍
What about this sentence [ the book about the president didn’t bother him] also (the students told themselves that the exam would include simple questions) help me
Actually , the principle B has confused me . what I understand is that a pronoun must be free in its binding domain , that is to say not bound . First to violate the binding : A shouldn't c-commands B , or A shouldn't co-indexed B as in ; Carol ( i ) said that she ( j ) was happy . . Second , the pronoun is free in domain. Here we can say that we could apply the princple B Is that what Principle B means or I get lost in this chapter of Binding theory . Another question Sir , do these principles dominate and control on if the clause grammatical or ungrammatical ?
she(j) is not bound since it is not co-indexed with Carol(i). Principle A and C usually match people's intuitions about whether a sentence is grammatical or not, but there is some experimental evidence that shows that Principle B can be violated and yet still be acceptable.
![[Syntax] X-Bar Theory - Specifiers, Adjuncts, and Complements](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/n8TYuq173N0/mqdefault.jpg)
![[Syntax] Theta Roles and Theta Grids](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/06MpE22sIPI/mqdefault.jpg)
![I.N "HALLUCINATION" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/n5B5q1Hwt_U/mqdefault.jpg)
![[Syntax] Tree Structure Relations and C-Command](/img/1.gif)
Thank you so much for this. I had to take an advanced syntax class this semester and never before had a syntax class. I just finished your series and finally understand what my lecturer is talking about. You explained everything so good. So again, thank you so much.
Just finished the series and, honestly, it helped so much! You are so elaborate and the way you explain things is super understandable, yet doesn't lack information. Great work!
This has honestly been amazing. Thank you SO much for this course, it honestly made me understand Syntax so much better. :D
Thank you so much for this. I'm taking Syntax II this term, and it's been 3 years since I took Syntax I, so having these videos as a refresher really helps and will not doubt help me throughout the semester.
You are AMAZING, I learn so much from your videos, they are comprehensive, easy, short, and also fun. Thank you so much.
you are just amazing . The best tutor in youtube. Thank you for all the videos,it has helped me a lot.
your videos are life/ grades savers, it covers the basics in a simple and clear way, if I fail my exam tomorrow at least I'll have this playlist to help me study next time
I've just finished your syntax series! It really helped me a lot to understand the syntax. neat handwriting, simple but thorough explanation! I wish i knew your video when i was still in uni. i will repeat your video until i fully absorb it to my knowledge! thank you very much for your effort to share this precious knowledge! from Korea :)
These exercises (and explanations within) are super helpful. Thanks!
I got a response to this comment, but I can't seem to read it outside of my notifications. Yes, I am from SFU.
I'm also there, so hopefully the videos will all be relevant for your course. It's designed with the 322 curriculum in mind.
Thank you for these wonderful videos so much! I would recommend this series to everyone who needs help in working with formal syntax.
This is super helpful. Thank you for making these videos!!!
Hi Ella How are you doing ? Please do you have something about X-bar Syntax ?
Thank you for the video!
I wanted to ask if you are going to do a video on subject tests. Inversion, Question tag and short answer tests seem straightfoward, but, during my syntax test, one of the sentences that we had to apply subjects tests to was ''What kinds of wrongdoing will we learn about this year?'', and that revealed to me that i still dont fully understand how do subject tests work.
Also, if anyone that can help with that sentence, i'd be very glad. the thing has been eating me for weeks now.
Hi, can I ask you what means c commands? I don’t understand, can you help me? Thanks for your help
What about small clauses? Would they become the binding domain, or do you still look at the TP?
Please is the smallest TP the same as embedded TP?
Thank you! I'm still not clear on how to tree sentences that contain fronted constituents in X' other than Wh phrases and auxiliary verbs.
For example: "Yesterday I went to the beach." Does "yesterday" move to Spec-C, to C or to something else?
What if there are two fronted constituents? "Yesterday in Madrid there was a riot." Do we put "yesterday" in Spec-C and "in Madrid" in C?
What if there are more than two fronted constituents: "Yesteday, in the kitchen, while doing the dishes, I saw a man out the window." ?
Can someone tell me what is DP here . Is it Daughter phrase ?? I missed a few lectures in between
Determiner Phrase
@@dawlathamad1690 thank you
Hi! veru good video. I have a question though, do binding principles apply at LF or before?
amazing clear explanations!! i'm in love!! I have a test on this tomorrow but i have a question about principle C (sorry you said you didn't want to talk about it):
"Maria saw herself" is a grammatical sentence but surely it flouts the principle C because herself and Maria are co-indexed ..... ??? help
If Maria is an antecedent, then it's okay. A principle C violation occurs when "Maria" is coindexed with something else BEFORE it.
thank you !!!!
@@Trevtutor what if we have a sentence 'She is Maria' and here She and Maria are co-indexed and bound. It still doesnt violate principle C? I could not understand what you meant by 'if Maria is coindexed with something before it'.
Can you please elaborate the concluding example? Anyway the series was brilliant, THANK YOU!
“She said that he loves herself” is in Latin totally grammatical.
Illa1 dixit [eum amare se1]
(I co-index using numbers)
This may have of course also another reading:
Illa dixit [eum2 amare se2]
In 1 co-indexing the reflection is said to be “indirect”; in 2 co-indexing “direct”. How could we come with a rule exposing that?
I should clarify that reflexives can be used in such an ambiguous way either in finite (“full CPs”: dependent clauses of many sorts) or non-finite verb phrases (infinitives, participles, gerunds etc, thus “null CPs). Infinitives with verbs introducing indirect speech (like dicere) are considered TPs, if I’m not so wrong.
Hi TrevTutor,
As for the 'What picture of himself did John like?'
Would it be okay to say that the deep structure of the question still represents John c-commands himself?
Your videos help me a lot!
thank you very much for all your help.
The final sentence is grammatical because complements and adjuncts of objects of a verb X will also allow reflexive pronouns to refer to (to be coindexed with) the subject of verb X.
(That Alex always passes out after drinking orange juice irks himself) how can I explain that this sentence is ungrammatical?, and Thanks a lot for your efforts, you really make syntax a piece of cake!🤍🤍
Can you please make a video about small clauses within X-bar theory
Please can you do a video on logical form!!!!! Your videos help me soooo much!
Please what is this : i and j stand for? And i did not understand sentence four the ungramatical one, in the principle b can you help please?
i and j are just index markers. Meaning that in sentence four, a paraphrase would be "Carol said that Carol loved Carol".
TheTrevTutor but looks the same as former ones?
Very good, good as everything good in this world : good voice carisma, that's the truth i wish if i could have found you befors.
how can i find principle c
Thank you a lot...!
Thanks a lot for this!!
I need advice, can I contact you please؟
Thank you❤
Really like your clear explanation !! Could you teach us about stranding and pied piping ? Syntax really confuses me...
What about this sentence [ the book about the president didn’t bother him] also (the students told themselves that the exam would include simple questions) help me
Please what does TP mean?
Tense Phrase. Some theories use IP (inflection phrase) instead but functionally it’s the same.
Thank you
Many thank's
Thanks dude
What means TP ? Can you explain? ☹️
THANKKK U
What a about "Why is Larissa hard to convince to trust herself?"?
thank
john
the principle A names... silent hill reference?
Actually , the principle B has confused me . what I understand is that a pronoun must be free in its binding domain , that is to say not bound . First to violate the binding : A shouldn't c-commands B , or A shouldn't co-indexed B as in ; Carol ( i ) said that she ( j ) was happy .
. Second , the pronoun is free in domain. Here we can say that we could apply the princple B
Is that what Principle B means or I get lost in this chapter of Binding theory .
Another question Sir , do these principles dominate and control on if the clause grammatical or ungrammatical ?
she(j) is not bound since it is not co-indexed with Carol(i).
Principle A and C usually match people's intuitions about whether a sentence is grammatical or not, but there is some experimental evidence that shows that Principle B can be violated and yet still be acceptable.
6:34 Unless you are Smeagol.
I love you
Plz can you give me your facebook page? I need you to correct a test for mr plz
I love you with all in me