Daniel 11 and the King of the North - Bill Pinto
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 10 янв 2024
- King Xerxes, Alexander the Great, the Ptolemaic and Seleucid dynasties, Pompey, Julius Ceaser, Cleopatra, Mark Antony, Caesar Augustus, love affairs, power struggles, the crucifixion, the forty-two months of papal persecution, Napoleon's invasion of Egypt, the Ottoman Empire...
Bearing testament to its divine authorship, the 11th chapter of Daniel foretells the history of this world. Now we are living at a time when the final verse of this chapter is soon to be fulfilled.
It's a prophecy you would not dare to miss.
For further study, read: The King of the North by Bill Pinto
static1.squarespace.com/stati...
www.earthenvessels.org.au
1/19/2024 what a marvelous presentation of Daniel 11 in the context of history. What I liked most about your presentation was the fact that you simply laid out the historical timeline of events and allowed me and others who watch this video to arrive at our own conclusions based upon the prophetic words in Daniel 11 itself. You did not ask me to accept your views or the views of the Adventist religion, but allowed me the freedom and responsibility to arrive at the conclusions which the historical facts supported and which the spirit guided me in arriving at. I thank Yahweh for inspiring you to deliver such a wonderful historical lecture and biblical walkthrough of more than 2300 years. Shabbat Shalom, my Beloved Brother Bill! 🕯️🙏🕎🌹😊
At a significant Adventist conference in Scandinavia, a PhD expert in Daniel and Revelation presented a lecture on the Israel-Palestine conflict, interpreting it through a biblical lens. He devoted considerable time to debunking dispensationalism, arguing that all references to Israel in the end times are metaphorical. During the discussion, I publicly questioned his stance, particularly his interpretation of the papacy's deviation from honoring the god of their fathers. In response, he offered convoluted explanations, including the claim that venerating the Immaculate Conception of Mary represented a shift in deity worship. Despite being met with laughter from the audience, I remained grateful for the opportunity to express my concerns about the dangers of idolizing a misconstrued trinity, among other things at that conference.
Thank you, Brother Bill.
Thank you. I previously requested someone from your ministry to do a study on Daniel 11 and now it's not only here, but very well done. You made Daniel 11 come alive. May God bless you and everyone at your church.
Thank you brother Bill, for a brilliant walk through history, as previously told in Daniel 11. This is incredible detail about what was going to happen. It is no wonder that the book of Daniel is under such constant attack. Only the God of the bible could have provided Daniel with such an accurate account of the future. God bless you all at Earthen Vessels, always.
The Ottoman Sultan Mehmed V officially proclaimed JIHAD on November 14, 1914.
Yet he came to his end,
NONE HELPED HIM!
Amen. The king of the north is the Ottoman Turk or Empire. But it's also worth noting that the Ottoman Empire came to its end (and none helped it) in the aftermath of WW1. The Eastern Question was answered. The Ottoman Turk established the headquarters for its army in the glorious holy mountain (the mount of Olives) and tabernacled in a multitude of other places between the Mediterranean and Dead Seas.
In essence, Daniel 11 is completely fulfilled and the honest watchmen of God ought to be looking the event next in order, which is the standing up of Michael.
God Bless. Maranatha.
I know conspiracy is huge but let's take the next step also study Sam Shamoun understand what Islam teaches and then share the truth the same way we have dealt with other conspiracies I know language has been a hindrance but there's no excuse share truth with love
You have it all wrong in this video. The little horns of Daniel 7 and 8 are not the same person. Daniel 8's is about Antiochus IV Epiphanes while Daniel 7's is speaking of Domitian the Roman emperor. The vile person and the willful king are not the same person either. The vile person is Antiochus IV Epiphanes but the willful king is a Roman emperor, Augustus (Octavian). Daniel 11 is nothing but transitions without telling you and it does it again near the end but it swaps to Rome in verse 36. Verse 36 to the end of the chapter are not about Antiochus IV Epiphanes at all and that is why it does not historically match him.... because it clearly is not about him.
No verse in any of Daniel 11 is referring to Julius Caesar at any time. 11:17 is referring to Antiochus III Megas (The Great) and that story is recorded on the Rosetta Stone. He tried to make a marriage peace treaty with the King of the South, Ptolemy V Epiphanes, by giving him his daughter Cleopatra I Syra but it would not work. Here is the verse, "He will resolve to come with the strength of his whole kingdom, and will reach an agreement with the king of the South. He will give him a daughter in marriage in order to overthrow the kingdom, but his plan will not succeed or help him." Daniel 11:18 also has nothing to do with Julius Caesar and you conveniently left out 1/2 of the verse... I wonder why? Verse 18 is still about Antiochus III Megas (The Great) who found himself fighting the Romans. The commander spoken of in the 2nd half of the verse that you left out is Lucius Cornelius Scippio Asiaticus and the battle is the battle of Magnesia and Thermopylae. Romans won in 188 BC. A very damaging treaty is made in favor of the Romans. Here is the FULL verse, "Then he will turn his face to the coastlands and capture many of them. But a commander will put an end to his reproach and will turn it back upon him." 11:19 is again still about Antiochus III, not Julius Caesar. He was murdered trying to rob a temple in Susa to pay reparations after the battle I just mentioned. Here is the verse, "After this, he will turn back toward the fortresses of his own land, but he will stumble and fall and be no more." 11:20 has nothing to do with Julius nor Augustus. That verse is about the successor or Antiochus III who was Seleucus IV Philopater who sent out a man named Heliodorus to raid Jerusalem temple in order to pay massive war debts racked up by his father, Antiochus III Megas (The Great). There is a painting of this by Raphael showing the expulsion of Heliodorus from the temple. He goes back to tell Seleucus he was stopped by 'angels'. Heliodorus then assassinates Seleucus IV Philopater later. Here is the verse: "In his place one will arise who will send out a tax collector for the glory of the kingdom; but within a few days he will be destroyed, though not in anger or in battle." There are SOOOO many errors in this presentation it is not even funny. I'm just going to make a separate post going through the entire thing without leaving out any verses like you did when you went from verse 22 and just skipped everything until verse 31. Seems you skipped them because they destroy your timeline and they don't fit, otherwise you would have gone over them.
Read Daniel 11:40 again, but very carefully and slowly. See the usage of the semicolon? Daniel 11:40, "And at the time of the end shall the king of the south shall attack HIM ; and the king of the north shall come against HIM like a whirlwind, with chariots, and with horsemen, and with many ships; and HE shall enter the countries, overwhelm them, and pass through." This verse is NOT saying that the king of the south will attack the king of the north, not even close. In fact, it is the complete opposite. It is saying that both the king of the south and the king of the north will both attack 'HIM'. So who is this 'him' character? Well, it is none other than the willful king (who is not the vile king). The willful king is Caesar Augustus (Octavian), the greatest Roman emperor of all time. When did all of this happen you may ask? This verse is telling you about the battle of Actium which took place in 31 BC. The king of the south, who was Cleopatra at the time shall attack the willful king, Caesar Augustus (Octavian) and at the same time the king of the north, who was Mark Antony at the time, would come against him (Caesar Augustus / Octavian) like a whirlwind, etc. This is a perfect description of the battle of Actium. All of that flows perfectly with how Daniel 11 has been reading while also keeping it chronological. Verses 41-44 are all also still about Caesar Augustus (Octavian) but for verse 45 it makes one last switch to Caesar Nero, a person very famous for not being helped at all even when trying to kill himself, they still did not help him.
Then it continues on in chapter 12 to say, "And at THAT TIME shall Michael stand up...etc." It is "the time of the end", NOT "the end of time". The end of time exists nowhere in the Bible. The time of the end of what? The end of the old covenant and the beginning of the new. Jesus was born during the reign of Caesar Augustus (Octavian) and this is when Jesus (Michael) stood up and began his ministry until he was crucified during the reign of Tiberius Caesar. That whole time from when Jesus was born until the destruction of the temple in Jerusalem in 70 AD was all the "time of the end". The end of the old covenant, not the end of the world or the end of time. It all matches perfectly. Daniel 11:40 tells you that at that time when that verse was playing out, it was the time of the end. They were already in it at that time. Remember what the book of Hebrews starts off by saying. Hebrews 1:1-2, "1 On many past occasions and in many different ways, God spoke to our fathers through the prophets. 2 But in THESE LAST DAYS He has spoken to us by His Son, whom He appointed heir of all things, and through whom He made the universe." The writer of Hebrews is telling you point blank to your face that they, back then, were in the last days. Also remember what John said in the beginning of Revelation in verse 9, "I, John, YOUR BROTHER AND PARTNER IN THE TRIBULATION and kingdom and perseverance that are in Jesus, was on the island of Patmos because of the word of God and my testimony about Jesus." Again, John tells you that they were in the end times and he was their partner in the tribulation. Not us today in 2024 or at any future date.
“This compromise between paganism and Christianity resulted in the development of “the man of sin” foretold in prophecy as opposing and exalting himself above God. That gigantic system of false religion is a masterpiece of Satan’s power-a monument of his efforts to seat himself upon the throne to rule the earth according to his will.” {EGW; Great Controversy 50.1} “And the king shall do according to his will; and he shall exalt himself, and magnify himself above every god, and shall speak marvellous things against the God of gods, …” (Dan 11:36) The Papacy is described using the phrase “according to his will”. It is also clearly identified as “exalting himself above every god”; even the “God of Gods”.
The king of the south is spiritual Egypt/Sodom: LGBT atheism (denial of/rebellion against God): “The “great city” in whose streets the witnesses are slain, and where their dead bodies lie, “is spiritually Egypt.” Of all nations presented in Bible history, Egypt most boldly denied the existence of the living God, and resisted his commands. No monarch ever ventured upon more open and high-handed rebellion against the authority of Heaven than did the king of Egypt. When the message was brought him by Moses, in the name of the Lord, Pharaoh proudly answered, “Who is Jehovah, that I should obey his voice to let Israel go? I know not Jehovah, neither will I let Israel go.” [Exodus 5:2.] This is atheism; and the nation represented by Egypt would give voice to a similar denial of the claims of the living God, and would manifest a like spirit of unbelief and defiance. The “great city” is also compared, “spiritually,” to Sodom. The corruption of Sodom in breaking the law of God was especially manifested in licentiousness. And this sin was also to be a pre-eminent characteristic of the nation that should fulfill the specifications of this scripture.”
{Ellen White; the Great Controversy p. 269}
James White Taught KON = Papacy
“There is a line of historic prophecy in chapter eleven, where the symbols are thrown off, beginning with the kings of Persia, and reaching down past Grecia and Rome, to the time when that power ‘shall come to his end, and none shall help him.’ If the feet and ten toes of the metallic image are Roman, if the beast with ten horns that was given to the burning flames of the great day be the Roman beast, if the little horn which stood up against the Prince of princes be Rome, and if the same field and distance are covered by these four prophetic chains, then the last power of the eleventh chapter, which is to ‘come to his end and none shall help him,’ is Rome. But if this be Turkey, as some teach, then the toes of the image of the second chapter are Turkish, the beast with ten horns of the seventh chapter represents Turkey, and it was Turkey that stood up against the Prince of princes of the eighth chapter of Daniel. True, Turkey is bad enough off; but its waning power and its end is the subject of the prophecy of John and not of Daniel.” {The Prophetic Faith of Our Fathers, vol. 4, Page 1067} dedication.www3.50megs.com/jswhite_eastern_question.html
Uriah Smith Taught KON = France
“In 1793 the worship of the Goddess of Reason was introduced, and is thus described by the historian:”
“A King Magnifies Himself Above Every God.--The king here introduced cannot denote the same power that was last noticed, namely, the papal power; for the specifications will not hold good if applied to that power. Take a declaration in the next verse: "Nor regard any god." This has never been true of the papacy. … France Fulfils the Prophecy.” {Daniel and the Revelation}
Therefore, either Uriah Smith is correct and Ellen White is incorrect, or Ellen White is correct and Uriah Smith is incorrect. It is one or the other.
Whom do we chose?