I completely agree! Neither the research, nor the researcher can benefit from isolation. I did a PhD in the field that doesn't usually rely on research groups, but my supervisors introduced me to other professionals working with qnd developing the same methodology I've been using. It was an incredibly useful and productive experience for me!
This is so validating. Thank you. It will not change much practically for my situation but it does give mental strength knowing I am not crazy for having the same view you described here.
@@James_Hayton Thank you for asking but no. I need to submit now, writing the discussions and struggling because I have not designed my research properly due to many hindering circumstances. I am encountering understanding from people, but that does not solve the problem. I feel the only thing I can do now is find an angle to "sell" my research. Be confident in the viva I did the best I could. It's just I fret it will not be enough. PhD is awarded for results (original contribution) not effort required/invested.
I work on a completely different work in my research. There are Ph.D. students but when I ask for help they say it's not my topic. That's the sole reason I jumped into RUclips to hear and get valid information. @James you're just amazing and I am glad I found your video
What I'd suggest (if you haven't done so already) is to just be interested in their work... even if they can't help directly, it exposes you to different ideas and ways of thinking
Thanks for saying this, I have ADHD and I've been really disheartened by the way "Independent Researcher" has been weaponized by neglectful supervisors to justify their lack of support for their students. As part of my condition I NEED external methods of accountability, it helps me so much. I absolutely don't want them to tell me what to do, I have so many of my own ideas that I'd love to pursue, but daily brief checkins with a supervisor helps me motivate myself greatly (which is a big struggle for people with ADHD) and allows me to externalize my thoughts, which is really energizing for me and allows me to reorient myself. Without regular contact it's so easy to drown, become demotivated and procrastinate. It's not because I'm not cut out to be a researcher, but simply because I have a disability that affects executive functioning. For all the talk of diversity and inclusion, academics are so ableist, and just want cookie cutter versions of themselves that never complain and get a tonne of publications without any help. It sucks, but hopefully one day it will change.
Hi James, very good point! I started to think that the goal of research training is to become a "proactive researcher" rather than an "independent researcher". Meaning that you learn to take enough ownership of your project that you feel motivated to interact with other researchers to gain knowledge and ideas that help your own research. PIs rarely solve their problems alone, they interact with their colleagues, people they meet at conferences, etc. So why shouldn't a PhD student do the same? Perhaps for some people the concept of an "independent researcher" means exactly that, but it definitely shouldn't mean working in isolation.
I agree on it. However, at my University, we were never encouraged to do that. Although we knew each other, and my PhD fellowmates were quite friendly and understanding, we always complained about the lack of support from our supervisors. I was really unfortunate to experience that.
It's an utter disgrace... these supervisors don't realise that apart from it being a moral duty to their students, if they gave just a bit of support it would serve their own careers. They'd get their names on more (and better) papers, AND if their students are successful it reflects back on them.
Only the person who claims to be independent can define what they mean by independence. In research, independence should be defined by how it benefits the research work itself and not the researcher. Independence is about minimizing distractions, unnecessary expenses and biases. Isolation is not the same thing as independence. Fraud requires isolation. Collaborating with others isn't always productive; too many cooks spoil the broth.
While I completely agree with your message here, how do you unlearn this? I have spent the better part of a decade in postdoctoral positions with this mantra. It hasn't been helpful, quite obviously.
Start talking to people! Be interested in other people's work and be open to collaboration. It might be difficult, but look for opportunities, notice any discomfort but do it anyway
@@James_Hayton Better said than done. However, I'll take note of your comment regarding "recognizing discomfort". It's akin to CBT but for researchers...🙂
For a full transcript of this video, visit: phd.academy/blog/the-myth-of-the-independent-researcher
I completely agree! Neither the research, nor the researcher can benefit from isolation. I did a PhD in the field that doesn't usually rely on research groups, but my supervisors introduced me to other professionals working with qnd developing the same methodology I've been using. It was an incredibly useful and productive experience for me!
This is so validating. Thank you. It will not change much practically for my situation but it does give mental strength knowing I am not crazy for having the same view you described here.
Is there anything in your power to change? Any ways of finding contact and support?
@@James_Hayton Thank you for asking but no. I need to submit now, writing the discussions and struggling because I have not designed my research properly due to many hindering circumstances. I am encountering understanding from people, but that does not solve the problem. I feel the only thing I can do now is find an angle to "sell" my research. Be confident in the viva I did the best I could. It's just I fret it will not be enough. PhD is awarded for results (original contribution) not effort required/invested.
I work on a completely different work in my research. There are Ph.D. students but when I ask for help they say it's not my topic. That's the sole reason I jumped into RUclips to hear and get valid information. @James you're just amazing and I am glad I found your video
What I'd suggest (if you haven't done so already) is to just be interested in their work... even if they can't help directly, it exposes you to different ideas and ways of thinking
@@James_Hayton sure, I will try it. Thanks for your support
This is so absolutely true - the part about supervisors using this as an excuse to neglect students.
Thanks for saying this, I have ADHD and I've been really disheartened by the way "Independent Researcher" has been weaponized by neglectful supervisors to justify their lack of support for their students. As part of my condition I NEED external methods of accountability, it helps me so much. I absolutely don't want them to tell me what to do, I have so many of my own ideas that I'd love to pursue, but daily brief checkins with a supervisor helps me motivate myself greatly (which is a big struggle for people with ADHD) and allows me to externalize my thoughts, which is really energizing for me and allows me to reorient myself. Without regular contact it's so easy to drown, become demotivated and procrastinate. It's not because I'm not cut out to be a researcher, but simply because I have a disability that affects executive functioning. For all the talk of diversity and inclusion, academics are so ableist, and just want cookie cutter versions of themselves that never complain and get a tonne of publications without any help. It sucks, but hopefully one day it will change.
Hi James, very good point! I started to think that the goal of research training is to become a "proactive researcher" rather than an "independent researcher". Meaning that you learn to take enough ownership of your project that you feel motivated to interact with other researchers to gain knowledge and ideas that help your own research. PIs rarely solve their problems alone, they interact with their colleagues, people they meet at conferences, etc. So why shouldn't a PhD student do the same?
Perhaps for some people the concept of an "independent researcher" means exactly that, but it definitely shouldn't mean working in isolation.
Proactivity is definitely a good quality to have.. the alternative is to be passive!
Thank you for highlighting this crucial point in research!!
I agree on it. However, at my University, we were never encouraged to do that. Although we knew each other, and my PhD fellowmates were quite friendly and understanding, we always complained about the lack of support from our supervisors. I was really unfortunate to experience that.
It's an utter disgrace... these supervisors don't realise that apart from it being a moral duty to their students, if they gave just a bit of support it would serve their own careers. They'd get their names on more (and better) papers, AND if their students are successful it reflects back on them.
Such an effective segment. I cannot do my dissertation on my own, but an engaged mentor is irreplaceable.
I really need help, I feel lonely doing my PhD , no guidance at all .......
Just finishing my PhD thesis totally on my own, while working full time, took me 3 years. Not recommended.
3 years is incredible ⭐
THANK YOU SO MUCH SIR.
so true. truth. truth. truth ☕☕☕
Very good video..... but got the advice bit late... networking is needed. But at times risky too
Why risky?
Only the person who claims to be independent can define what they mean by independence. In research, independence should be defined by how it benefits the research work itself and not the researcher. Independence is about minimizing distractions, unnecessary expenses and biases.
Isolation is not the same thing as independence. Fraud requires isolation.
Collaborating with others isn't always productive; too many cooks spoil the broth.
While I completely agree with your message here, how do you unlearn this? I have spent the better part of a decade in postdoctoral positions with this mantra. It hasn't been helpful, quite obviously.
Start talking to people! Be interested in other people's work and be open to collaboration. It might be difficult, but look for opportunities, notice any discomfort but do it anyway
@@James_Hayton Better said than done. However, I'll take note of your comment regarding "recognizing discomfort". It's akin to CBT but for researchers...🙂
Thanks for sharing
Thanks
It's funny. I know some independent researchers in NGOs, non-profits, and industry who don't have PhDs. And they collaborate. :)