Cheapest APSC autofocus portrait lens Viltrox AF 56mm 1.7 (APS-C Fujifilm X / Sony E / Nikon Z )

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 4 июл 2024
  • For more information or purchase the Viltrox AF 56mm f/1.7 and f/1.4:
    Official webstore: viltroxstore.com/products/vil...
    Amazon: amzn.to/4aYIh47
    (Affiliated links)
    Camera gear I used to shoot this video:
    Panasonic Lumix S5II | Lumix S 24mm f/1.8
    Zeapon Axis Slider
    Synco D2 Microphone
    Disclaimer: The product sample I used in this video was sent to me by the manufacturer for this review. I do not need to return the sample but I also did not receive any money from the company
    Instagram: / photo_by_richard
    My Miniature Photography Instagram: / scalequests
    Facebook: / photobyrichard
    0:00 Viltrox 56mm f/1.7 Introduction
    1:38 Body Design
    3:36 Autofocus
    4:18 Image Sharpness
    6:56 Close Up
    7:24 Bokeh
    8:27 Vignetting
    8:56 Chromatic Aberration
    9:25 Distortion
    10:08 Lens Flare
    10:50 Sunstars
    11:07 Coma
    11:29 Videography
    12:00 Final Thoughts
  • НаукаНаука

Комментарии • 63

  • @Geekception
    @Geekception 2 месяца назад +8

    The 56mm f1.7mm is such insane value in a compact package. awesome video as usual Richard!

  • @homecareful
    @homecareful Месяц назад +3

    When I really want to know about a new lens, I check you or Dustin Abbot. You are quickly becoming one of the best lens reviewers on RUclips.

    • @TheRealRichardWong
      @TheRealRichardWong  Месяц назад

      Oh thank you so much! Happy to hear my name alongside legends like Dustin Abbott

  • @ramonarias1234
    @ramonarias1234 3 месяца назад +3

    Thanks for your work, its very useful for the photographers to know, great to see how the lens performs in each of the sections

  • @GeekyNerdyTechy
    @GeekyNerdyTechy 3 месяца назад +2

    Great review, Richard! Nice work mate.

  • @gpjennett9819
    @gpjennett9819 2 месяца назад +10

    The "all metal construction" meme is pretty much a red herring. When you have a lens construction that is made out of all Aluminum, you have a huge CTE [coefficient of thermal expansion] mismatch between the "all metal construction" and the glass elements of the optics. Weird things can happen with temperature changes in the environment where/when you are shooting. I live in the Sonoran Desert. The all metal lenses can be a problem shooting in the hottest part of the Summer. Glass-filled composite plastics used in the construction of precision things like camera lenses have a CTE that better matches the CTE of the glass in the optics. - I've not seen many RUclips lens reviews that take design intent and materials science finesse into consideration when it comes to the functional engineering of the lenses.

    • @x-ij9uj
      @x-ij9uj 22 дня назад +1

      Most of us don't live in a dessert. Metal feels nicer to the touch plus it doesn't release toxic gases so I'll stick to metal all day.

    • @toddm6999
      @toddm6999 14 дней назад

      If climate change continues than we will all be living in a dessert.

    • @x-ij9uj
      @x-ij9uj 13 дней назад +1

      @toddm6999 lmao that s#t doesn't exist.

    • @toddm6999
      @toddm6999 13 дней назад

      @@x-ij9uj yeah like don't be science based be misinformation based

    • @toddm6999
      @toddm6999 13 дней назад

      @@x-ij9uj Scientific evidence for warming of the climate system is unequivocal. Ice cores drawn from Greenland, Antarctica, and tropical mountain glaciers show that Earth's climate responds to changes in greenhouse gas levels.

  • @Kliffot
    @Kliffot Месяц назад +3

    Nice review ! That 56mm f1.7 is incredible for the price, but I still think the old 56mm f1.4 is better value overall, it's possible to find it at good price.

    • @daichit979
      @daichit979 Месяц назад

      I just bought f1.4 for around 140usd used! Can't wait to try it😊

  • @leoshueh1
    @leoshueh1 2 месяца назад +2

    Thank you for this review. Well done.

  • @blake9181
    @blake9181 2 месяца назад +1

    Having a hard time deciding what’s for me between the Viltrox 56mm 1.4 and the 85mm 1.8. I’m a beginner that’s into street photo but I want to take pictures of my friends and do portraits and my kit lens is the 15-45mm from my xt200. Any input I would GREATLY appreciate!!!

    • @TheRealRichardWong
      @TheRealRichardWong  2 месяца назад +1

      Hello there, what 85 1.8 are you referring to

    • @Plitch.
      @Plitch. Месяц назад

      I think he refers to the Viltrox

  • @zacx6970
    @zacx6970 3 месяца назад +1

    It gave off the same Fuji-XC lens series vibes.

  • @arkadiybolachkov
    @arkadiybolachkov 3 месяца назад +1

    Thanks for that detailed review!

  • @rafierizkie
    @rafierizkie 3 месяца назад

    How it compare to XC 35mm/F2? Both got the same price in my place, I really wish there's comparison so my spending will be worth. More likely, I always bring my camera for street and car photography....

    • @TheRealRichardWong
      @TheRealRichardWong  2 месяца назад

      Sorry i haven't got a chance to borrow a XC35 f/2 to compare

    • @k1k13004
      @k1k13004 2 месяца назад

      xc35 is amazing. The IQ is much higher but for BG separation the difference will be huge.

  • @masterofcamera
    @masterofcamera 3 месяца назад +1

    Wow what a fast lens for such a low price, well done Viltrox!
    Great review... feels like you're posting these videos faster than Dj Khaled can say 'Another One'. 😂

    • @TheRealRichardWong
      @TheRealRichardWong  3 месяца назад +2

      Sleeping is overrated.

    • @masterofcamera
      @masterofcamera 3 месяца назад

      ​@@TheRealRichardWong Yeah I would say so.. speaking from experience, last night was around 3.30 am lol

    • @TheRealRichardWong
      @TheRealRichardWong  3 месяца назад +1

      @@masterofcamera MasterOfNoSleep 😵‍💫

  • @-shakirov
    @-shakirov 2 месяца назад +1

    villtrox 56 1.7 better than sigma 56 1.4 on CA aspect? or autofocus and sharpness ?

  • @zefcypher
    @zefcypher 2 месяца назад +2

    Good stuff!

  • @capturingthedrama
    @capturingthedrama 2 месяца назад +1

    Image sharpness is a deal breaker for me 😢 definitely spending more for the 1.4 version.
    Thank you for this in-depth review!

    • @TheRealRichardWong
      @TheRealRichardWong  2 месяца назад +1

      Thanks for watching

    • @richardhale9664
      @richardhale9664 2 месяца назад +2

      It's all a compromise. It depends on whether one shoots a lot at f1.4 - f2.8 or more commonly (like me) in the range f4 -f8 where there is no difference between the two lenses. If I did not already have the 56mm f.4, I would choose this f1.7 model as I value the smaller form factor more than the slightly better fast aperture performance of the f1.4.

    • @capturingthedrama
      @capturingthedrama 2 месяца назад

      @@TheRealRichardWong On 2nd thought, I've seen other reviews with not-so-bad wide-open aperture sharpness... If you could post a link where we can check the raw files of portrait photos shot on 1.7 - then you'd be the best camera reviewer ever!!!!! :)

    • @TheRealRichardWong
      @TheRealRichardWong  2 месяца назад +2

      @@capturingthedrama hi there, sorry i don't post RAW files anymore these days because of some bad experience. Hope you can understand.

    • @capturingthedrama
      @capturingthedrama 2 месяца назад +1

      @@TheRealRichardWong of course! Not a problem 😊 appreciate the response my friend!

  • @DamianBrown
    @DamianBrown 3 месяца назад +1

    Thanks Richard!!

  • @farissatyawibisana924
    @farissatyawibisana924 2 месяца назад

    If I can get the 56mm f1.4 for around $200, should I spent more on the f1.4?

    • @TheRealRichardWong
      @TheRealRichardWong  2 месяца назад +1

      I would get the f/1.4 if price is similar. the 1.4 has better quality and faster maximum aperture

    • @farissatyawibisana924
      @farissatyawibisana924 2 месяца назад

      @@TheRealRichardWong Thanks. Great review as always :)

  • @stevenbamford5245
    @stevenbamford5245 2 месяца назад +4

    Viltrox 56mm 1.4 has horrible CA that's why I sold it on.

    • @Kliffot
      @Kliffot Месяц назад

      Yeah indoor or in shades wide open it was alright, but outside on sunny days had to stop down to f2.8 to make them disappear or shoot in B&W. Would be nice if they make a mark II of the 23/33/56 with the same good CA control of their newest lens.

  • @namesurname5256
    @namesurname5256 2 месяца назад

    How is 1.7 on fullframe?

  • @dmgfilmproductionandphotog1567
    @dmgfilmproductionandphotog1567 2 месяца назад

    hope they make a mft version for this

  • @sirwillemgaming9686
    @sirwillemgaming9686 3 месяца назад +1

    This makes me think that the other lenses are just a expensive because of their brand name even if they have a bit better quality.

    • @TheRealRichardWong
      @TheRealRichardWong  3 месяца назад +1

      Yes pricing is a complicated thing. Brand name, Perceived value would influence just as much as the quality and cost.

  • @djxcel23
    @djxcel23 3 месяца назад +1

    If i didn’t have the sigma i would scoop this up

  • @ramonarias1234
    @ramonarias1234 3 месяца назад +1

    a bargain for the price.!!

  • @KillingTheMost
    @KillingTheMost 3 месяца назад

    wow so good