That "since the Han dynasty" bs is ridiculous! If the Chinese think they had a strong claim because their ancestors had been fishing there while they were busy breaking up, reuniting, breaking up and the cycle goes on. In that case, the Filipinos have a stronger claim because their ancestors were not only fishing there but they were also bathing & swimming there for recreation because it's literally a backyard pool (Spratlys & Scarborough) for the Filipinos.
When the Chinese showed up at least 1000 years ago and for sure 500 years ago They had to go to Luzon to find your Filipino ancestors Their Chinese ancestors probably said these disputed islands ours to facilitate trade Your ancestors probably went okay na lang thank you sir come again siiiiiirrrrr The Spanish, Japanese and Americans committed vvar cri mes and acts of gen o cide on the Philippines yet they are the countries you b egg for help these days The Chinese should actually learn from that What’s the point in making all these, ships, planes WMDs if you don’t test them out 👇 The Chinese Treasure Fleet in 15th century Philippines * It was the people of our archipelago who discovered Magellan and the Europeans in 1521, not the other way around, as most Filipinos were taught by our grade-school textbooks. Our islands and their inhabitants were well-known to a larger, richer world that of Chinese emperors and scholars and Arab traders, as early as the 9th, even 6th centuries. And certainly by 1000 A.D., our shores were regular ports of call in the trade with China, then the most powerful nation on earth. Chinese chronicles, European archaeologists and the diggings in our pre-colonial burial grounds prove that those ancient Filipinos used fine porcelain, weights and measures imported from China, and recorded written contracts. Chao-Ju-Kua reported that Chinese traders visited Ma-I (Luzon) regularly, leaving silks, porcelain and metal utensils on the beaches of designated islands, and returning weeks later to collect payment in the form of beeswax, gold dust, carabao horn, ginger, cinnamon or garlic. It was an import-export system run on a reliable honor system with unquestioned good faith. * When Magellan’s Spanish Armada hove into view in March 1521, the natives of Homonhon in the Visayas must have taken pity on the small black ships with tattered sails and scruffy, starving, disoriented sailors, for they sent a small rowboat packed with rice, coconuts and bananas to their rescue. On the next island, the white, bearded strangers were feted in a bamboo palace with a banquet of roast fish, pork, turtle eggs and palm wine, by a native king whose queen wore a black-and-white gown, red lips and nails, while a quartet of young, topless damsels played music on various gongs and drums. Those early Filipinos had been more accustomed to the tall, prosperous, Chinese ships with a trio of feathery sails stiffened with battens, for the China trade had been in place for at least 500 years. During the Ming Dynasty, Filipinos enjoyed the visits of the Treasure Fleet (1405-1500) of Admiral Cheng Ho (Zhen He) a huge, 7-ft tall, powerful eunuch, who had built 1,500 massive, 500-ft ships in a giant shipyard in Nanking with the help of 30,000 workers. The luxurious ships, each manned by 1,000 sailors ruled the South Pacific and the Indian Ocean. * But the Chinese were not interested in conquest or territorial aggrandizement. Their purposes were trade and diplomacy. That was what our ancestors expected when they first saw the Spanish Armada. Filipinos had never seen white men before Magellan and never thought the strangers would be as rapacious and predatory as they would prove to be. They assumed the new foreigners to be poor and needy because they had only glass beads, a string of little bells and a red cap (Magellan’s gifts) to reciprocate the native prodigality. The white men were, in fact, so dazzled by the earrings, chains, armlets and anklets, of pure gold, worn by both the native men and women that Magellan had to warn them against showing their covetousness. Philstar
@@SS-dc5jz the difference there is that the US signed an agreement to relinquish their control over the Philippines, that agreement is called the Tydings Mcduffie law. So by US law, the US has relinquished all its Philippine territories to the government of the Philippines
If they intend to use the Han dynasty map then they need to give Tibet and most of western China away because according to the Han dynasty map, Western parts of modern China is not part of China
China will join Malaysia and Indonesia in opposing the Philippines' aggression. Why doesn't the Philippines think about being excluded in ASEAN? An aggressive country.
With the new laws, the Philippines 🇵🇭 will be able to *board and arrest* Chinese vessels, maritime militias or Coast Guard, not operating on the defined sea lanes within the Philippine's EEZ.
When paper laws meet the law of nature. Law of Nature always win. China learned this game from the West when once upon a time the West bullied them and took territories like Hong Kong.
*International laws* are very clear on the South China Sea: - parts of it belong to some ASEAN countries including the Philippines 🇵🇭, - the rest of it is the international water, - no part of it belongs to China🇨🇳 or Taiwan🇹🇼.
@@ArabicReja973 Except the Chinese didn’t have to recognize that tribunal In any event they ruled no one exhibited continuous control over disputed islands so everyone is digging into the islands they control including China and the Philippines 👇 Article 295 Exhaustion of local remedies Any dispute between States Parties concerning the interpretation or application of this Convention may be submitted to the procedures provided for in this section only after local remedies have been exhausted where this is required by international law. Article 296 Finality and binding force of decisions 1. Any decision rendered by a court or tribunal having jurisdiction under this section shall be final and shall be complied with by all the parties to the dispute. 2. Any such decision shall have no binding force except between the parties and in respect of that particular dispute. SECTION 3. LIMITATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS TO APPLICABILITY OF SECTION 2 Article 297 Limitations on applicability of section 2 1. Disputes concerning the interpretation or application of this Convention with regard to the exercise by a coastal State of its sovereign rights or jurisdiction provided for in this Convention shall be subject to the procedures provided for in section 2 in the following cases: (a) when it is alleged that a coastal State has acted in contravention of the provisions of this Convention in regard to the freedoms and rights of navigation, overflight or the laying of submarine cables and pipelines, or in regard to other internationally lawful uses of the sea specified in article 58; (b) when it is alleged that a State in exercising the aforementioned freedoms, rights or uses has acted in contravention of this Convention or of laws or regulations adopted by the coastal State in conformity with this Convention and other rules of international law not incompatible with this Convention; or (c) when it is alleged that a coastal State has acted in contravention of specified international rules and standards for the protection and preservation of the marine environment which are applicable to the coastal State and which have been established by this Convention or through a competent international organization or diplomatic conference in accordance with this Convention. 2. (a) Disputes concerning the interpretation or application of the provisions of this Convention with regard to marine scientific research shall be settled in accordance with section 2, except that the coastal State shall not be obliged to accept the submission to such settlement of any dispute arising out of: (i) the exercise by the coastal State of a right or discretion in accordance with article 246; or (ii) a decision by the coastal State to order suspension or cessation of a research project in accordance with article 253. (b) A dispute arising from an allegation by the researching State that with respect to a specific project the coastal State is not exercising its rights under articles 246 and 253 in a manner compatible with this Convention shall be submitted, at the request of either party, to conciliation under Annex V, section 2, provided that the conciliation commission shall not call in question the exercise by the coastal State of its discretion to designate specific areas as referred to in article 246, paragraph 6, or of its discretion to withhold consent in accordance with article 246, paragraph 5. 3. (a) Disputes concerning the interpretation or application of the provisions of this Convention with regard to fisheries shall be settled in accordance with section 2, except that the coastal State shall not be obliged to accept the submission to such settlement of any dispute relating to its sovereign rights with respect to the living resources in the exclusive economic zone or their exercise, including its discretionary powers for determining the allowable catch, its harvesting capacity, the allocation of surpluses to other States and the terms and conditions established in its conservation and management laws and regulations. (b) Where no settlement has been reached by recourse to section 1 of this Part, a dispute shall be submitted to conciliation under Annex V, section 2, at the request of any party to the dispute, when it is alleged that: (i) a coastal State has manifestly failed to comply with its obligations to ensure through proper conservation and management measures that the maintenance of the living resources in the exclusive economic zone is not seriously endangered; (ii) a coastal State has arbitrarily refused to determine, at the request of another State, the allowable catch and its capacity to harvest living resources with respect to stocks which that other State is interested in fishing; or (iii) a coastal State has arbitrarily refused to allocate to any State, under articles 62, 69 and 70 and under the terms and conditions established by the coastal State consistent with this Convention, the whole or part of the surplus it has declared to exist. (c) In no case shall the conciliation commission substitute its discretion for that of the coastal State. (d) The report of the conciliation commission shall be communicated to the appropriate international organizations. (e) In negotiating agreements pursuant to articles 69 and 70, States Parties, unless they otherwise agree, shall include a clause on measures which they shall take in order to minimize the possibility of a disagreement concerning the interpretation or application of the agreement, and on how they should proceed if a disagreement nevertheless arises. Article 298 Optional exceptions to applicability of section 2 1. When signing, ratifying or acceding to this Convention or at any time thereafter, a State may, without prejudice to the obligations arising under section 1, declare in writing that it does not accept any one or more of the procedures provided for in section 2 with respect to one or more of the following categories of disputes: (a) (i) disputes concerning the interpretation or application of articles 15, 74 and 83 relating to sea boundary delimitations, or those involving historic bays or titles, provided that a State having made such a declaration shall, when such a dispute arises subsequent to the entry into force of this Convention and where no agreement within a reasonable period of time is reached in negotiations between the parties, at the request of any party to the dispute, accept submission of the matter to conciliation under Annex V, section 2; and provided further that any dispute that necessarily involves the concurrent consideration of any unsettled dispute concerning sovereignty or other rights over continental or insular land territory shall be excluded from such submission; (ii) after the conciliation commission has presented its report, which shall state the reasons on which it is based, the parties shall negotiate an agreement on the basis of that report; if these negotiations do not result in an agreement, the parties shall, by mutual consent, submit the question to one of the procedures provided for in section 2, unless the parties otherwise agree; (iii) this subparagraph does not apply to any sea boundary dispute finally settled by an arrangement between the parties, or to any such dispute which is to be settled in accordance with a bilateral or multilateral agreement binding upon those parties; (b) disputes concerning military activities, including military activities by government vessels and aircraft engaged in non-commercial service, and disputes concerning law enforcement activities in regard to the exercise of sovereign rights or jurisdiction excluded from the jurisdiction of a court or tribunal under article 297, paragraph 2 or 3; (c) disputes in respect of which the Security Council of the United Nations is exercising the functions assigned to it by the Charter of the United Nations, unless the Security Council decides to remove the matter from its agenda or calls upon the parties to settle it by the means provided for in this Convention. 2. A State Party which has made a declaration under paragraph 1 may at any time withdraw it, or agree to submit a dispute excluded by such declaration to any procedure specified in this Convention. 3. A State Party which has made a declaration under paragraph 1 shall not be entitled to submit any dispute falling within the excepted category of disputes to any procedure in this Convention as against another State Party, without the consent of that party. 4. If one of the States Parties has made a declaration under paragraph 1(a), any other State Party may submit any dispute falling within an excepted category against the declarant party to the procedure specified in such declaration. 5. A new declaration, or the withdrawal of a declaration, does not in any way affect proceedings pending before a court or tribunal in accordance with this article, unless the parties otherwise agree. 6. Declarations and notices of withdrawal of declarations under this article shall be deposited with the Secretary-General of the United Nations, who shall transmit copies thereof to the States Parties. Article 299 Right of the parties to agree upon a procedure 1. A dispute excluded under article 297 or excepted by a declaration made under article 298 from the dispute settlement procedures provided for in section 2 may be submitted to such procedures only by agreement of the parties to the dispute. 2. Nothing in this section impairs the right of the parties to the dispute to agree to some other procedure for the settlement of such dispute or to reach an amicable settlement. UN . ORG
Murillo Maps is The oldest Maps of all,the Evidence WPS are belongs to the Philippines,china historical claims is Elementary child drawing China Modern Maps 😅
@johntwohy8337 if there's an Ancient China maps, it's a Maps a secret maps of china and became forever a secret maps,The china claims in Tribunal no maps presented as legal basis claims,😆
THE WORLD KNOWS that the Philippine Claim is LEGAL and BINDING -- UNCLOS China's claim is not. Where in the International Law that 9-line or 10-line is legal ? -- None. Historical Basis -- The magnificent map of the Philippine archipelago, drawn by the Jesuit Father Pedro Murillo Velarde in Manila in 1734.
The other way round. Phillpines is against the international laws. According to UNCLOS, Philippines have no legal grounds to issue the 2 new laws. According to UNCLOS, Phillpines send EEZ application in the South China Sea, but the EEZ application had been rejected by UN that make Philippine have no EEZ recognized by UN. Phillipine have issued 2 illegal laws that against UN's official decision.
@@terancekwwong7878 - International laws are very clear on the South China Sea: - parts of it belong to some ASEAN countries including the Philippines 🇵🇭, - the rest of it is the international water, - no part of it belongs to China🇨🇳 .
@@joelvalenzuela981 You stop sending out this AI Fake message. My pervious post your replied clearly stated according to UNCLOS, Phillpines's application on the EEZ in the South China Sea had been rejected by UN. According to UNCLOS, Phillpines is against UNCLOS in setting the new laws applied to the UNs Unrecognized EEZ.
@@yayeltvChina losing Nothing. Phillpines paid the bills for the tribunal and change from "Disputed EEZ" to "Unrecognized EEZ from UN". This is what you said Phillpines winning an Unrecognized EEZ from UN! Who need to cry. This situation is quite absurd. Under international law, specifically the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), the Philippines lacks the legal basis to enact the two new laws in question. The Philippines submitted an application for an Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) in the South China Sea; however, this application was rejected by the United Nations, resulting in the absence of any recognized EEZ for the Philippines in that region. Consequently, the Philippines has enacted two laws that are not only unlawful but also stem from unfounded assumptions, contradicting the UN's official stance of not recognizing any Philippine EEZ in the South China Sea. It is a shame for the Philippines government to state the new laws are based on UNCLOS where the UNCLOS never recognized Philippines have a legal EEZ in the South China Sea.
Chinese didn't get in there until the 90s when the US left. US used those island as target practice when the US Air base in the philippines were operational. This Joseph Estrsda fault being corrupt and not agreed upon the deal and closed the US base.
@@RomaVilla-q6k well the truth is that In 2022, after Biden warned Marcos Jr. that the U.S. would block his access to his father’s allegedly corrupt inheritance held in U.S. banks if he didn’t cooperate, Marcos began stirring up issues in the region.
God Blessed the Philippines 🇵🇭 mabuhay ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤ mabuhay President Bong bong Marcos 💖 may the lord guide you always we love you ❤❤❤thank you ikaw ang aming Pangulo ng Pilipinas
FYI; the recent two new Law's of the philippines is base and drawn on International Law's and maritime rules of the Sea. 2016 Permanent Court of Arbitration favored to the philippines and UNCLOS ( EEZ ) and Treaty of Washington 1900 . The new Law's just defined extent and assert there rights in accordance of international Law's and social Norm's lastly as a sovereign country.
FYI, According to 1596 Presidential Decrees Year 1978, Philippines acquired the islands in the South China Sea on the reason of Terra nullius, including Philippines, no country is the owner of those islands and maritime water. That is a fact that the 1596 PD confessed Phillipines have no treaty (including Washington treaty), no map, no legal document to support the sovereign right and Sovereight on those areas. FYI, if the 2016 rulling is favour Philippines and recongozed by UN, Philippines should have a recognized EEZ from UN in the Sourh China Sea. However the application of the EEZ from Phillipines to UN had been rejected. That means UN never recognize Philippines have any EEZ in the South China Sea that make the two new laws are illegal and violate the UNCLOS and international law.
@@babyblue8891 no one accepts the Chinese 9 dash line claims 👇 The US Is Claiming One Million Square Kilometers Of New Land An area the size of California Medium 👇 Timeline of the South China Sea dispute * It has been claimed by the People's Republic of China on the argument that since 200 BCE Chinese fishermen have used the Spratly islands * Naval forces of the Liu Song dynasty (420-479 CE) patrolled the Paracel and Spratly islands.[5] In the Tang dynasty (618-907 CE), the islands were placed under the administration and authority of the Qiongzhou Prefecture (now Hainan Province).[5] The Chinese administration of the South China Sea continued into the Song dynasty (960-1279 CE).[5] * Archaeologists have found Chinese made potteries porcelains and other historical relics from the Southern dynasties (420-589 CE), the Sui dynasty (581-619 CE), the Tang dynasty, the Song dynasty, the Yuan dynasty (1271-1368 CE), the Ming dynasty (1368-1644 CE) and later eras up to modern times on the South China Sea islands.[5] 1876 - China makes its earliest documented claim to the Paracel Islands[citation needed] 1883 - When the Spratlys and Paracels were surveyed by Germany in 1883, China issued protests. 1887 - In the 19th century, Europeans found that Chinese fishermen from Hainan annually visited the Spratly islands for part of the year, while in 1877 it was the British who launched the first modern legal claims to the Spratlys 1902 - China sends naval forces on inspection tours of the Paracel Islands to preempt French claims.[28] Scholar François-Xavier Bonnet argued that per Chinese records, these expeditions never occurred and were backdated during the 1970s.[29][30] 1907 - China sends another naval force, this time to plan for resource exploitation.[28] 1911 - The newly formed Republic of China, successor state to the Qing dynasty, moves administration of the Paracel Islands to Hainan,[28] which would not become a separate Chinese province until 1988. 1946 - The R.O.C. established garrisons on both Woody (now Yongxing / 永兴) Island in the Paracels and Taiping Island in the Spratlys. France protested. The French tried but failed to dislodge Chinese nationalist troops from Yongxing Island/Woody Island (the only habitable island in the Paracels), but were able to establish a small camp on Pattle (now Shanhu / 珊瑚) Island in the southwestern part of the archipelago.[37][38][39] The Republic of China drew up The Southern China Sea Islands Location Map, marking the national boundaries in the sea with 11 lines, two of which were later removed, showing the U-shaped claim on the entire South China Sea, and showing the Spratly and Paracels in Chinese territory, in 1947.[28] The Americans reminded the Philippines at its independence in 1946 that the Spratlys was not Philippine territory, both to not anger Chiang Kai-shek in China and because the Spratlys were not part of the Philippines per the 1898 treaty Spain signed with America.[38] 1950 - After the Chinese nationalists were driven from Hainan by the People's Liberation Army (PLA), they withdrew their garrisons in both the Paracels and Spratlys to Taiwan. 1969 - A UN sponsored research team discovers oil under the sea floor of the island group. 1970 - China occupies Amphitrite Group of the Paracel Islands * In 1596, the Spanish Colonial Government declared that each island in the Kalayaan Islands, now known as the Spratly Islands, had Barangay or Barrio status. 1971 - Philippines announces claim to islands adjacent to its territory in the Spratlys, which they named Kalayaan, which was formally incorporated into Palawan Province in 1972. The Philippines President Marcos announced the claims after Taiwanese troops attacked and shot at a Philippine fishing boat on Itu Aba.[ Wikipedia
Because there are Chinese fishermen living on the island, you only see favorable opinions about the Philippines on RUclips, but the news you see on TIKTOK is completely different from that on RUclips. Malaysia, Vietnam, China and Indonesia all hate the Philippines' aggressive behavior.
Go to take a look the dash line between Greek and Turkey. Greece had entirely the whole Aegean Sea. These dash lines are legal and never changed after the UNCLOS. Any country should have 12 Nmiles according to UNCLOS. Turkey had applied for 6 NMiles (not 12 NMiles) from 3 NMiles. But the application had been rejected by UN because UNCLOS cannot supersede sovereign right and Sovereight before UNCLOS. The 9 dash line is sovereignty and sovereign rights before UNCLOS.
If Philippines had a problem with chinese in Philippine sea why they didn’t know that chinese had a big mining in Bicol province of manila heard that no pilipinos work inside the said mining is there any malicious thing happening inside?
Why not we ask magellan the Portuguese geographer landed in Cebu in 1500? philippine is already existed in year 400AD pre historic up to 900AD-1500 colonial Era? Those Shoal are shared with multiple traders and fishermen not until this china wants to claim the whole Southeast Asia Sea. They’re feeling entitled because our politicians failed to protect our sovereign rights. Kudos to Marcos for having balls to protect and maintain the balance peace. Indonesia and Philippines are closest austronesian brothers as you can see indo and filipino have similarities.
But those islands were discovered and named by the Chinese. China had already named them before the Philippines was established. It's just that the Philippines wants to expand its territory. As a Malaysian, I hate the Philippines' aggressive behavior. In Asia, China, Vietnam and Malaysia have all had their islands invaded by the Philippines.
@@junweipan2494 He must agreed that Philippines did not existed (as a whole country) 2000 year ago right? So there must be a lot of small counties or small groups of people in the area. What is the rationale behind to think all of them recognize nowadays Phillipines is country. Why not some group of people already settled in Malaysia and they want to distinguish themself not the people of Philippines? Why not these Malaysian have no legal rights to claim the whole Phillipines as Malaysian''s territory? It is the same bullshir rationale that he think the nowadays Phillipines can claim the South China Sea as well as the territories of east Malaysia.Then he have to agreed those Indonesian, Malaysian, Singaporen etc etc to have legal rights to cliam Philippines as thier territory.
@@junweipan2494 what you talking about yes we don’t have governmental system 2000 years ago but we do have Barangays ruled by Sultan Kings, DaTu, Rajah, and Lakan. But in year 1898 we did have created settlement to establish government system. Malaysia is far ahead of us back then. Your country even claim our Sabah that sultanate of sulu use for “RENT” Tagalog tribe and sultanate of sulu is the first people who rule our country but let me clarify that we are Trader, and fishermen, sea travelers, and warrior. Back then Like what happening last month Sulatanate of SuLu and Mindanaoan is officially created their own parliamentarian government but they are under control by upper ruler which is by the Luzonian Government. Your country owe us some money you have to pay your rent to sulatanatw of Sulu!!! otherwise You’re country have same interests claiming that doesn’t belong to them like china.
that reefs belong to Philippine until Chinese pirates steal in 2012 to reduce the tension ph warship and china warship should left but Chinese pirates comeback and steal the reef.
@@bitcoinmonitor7144 Trung Quốc là những tên cướp biển 🏴☠️ người Trung Quốc đã cướp quần đảo hoàng sa của chúng tôi vào năm 1974 với sự làm ngơ của Hoa Kỳ
400AD up to 900AD we don’t have a government because our country is ruled by Mactan, sultan, and Tagalog tribe. Not until the spanish colonization in year 1500 they completely controlled and conquered us. In year 1800 the first filipino revolution has established mostly started by Tagalog Tribe or Tondo tribe. Government system only happened in year 1898 we are still under control by the USA because we are sold by the spanish government to the USA. So those freaking Chinese are dreaming because most of Filipino are Sea travelers and trader. We trade silver, gold, materials, goods, and more.
Just like Taiwan, this is self-inflicted problem. By declaring the Philippines imaginary laws. It gave China no choice but to enforce and take drastic action. 😮
Muslim colonizers invaded the Philippines in the 1400s, Prior to Muslim colonization, there were NO SULTANS in the Philippines. So why did you claim that the country was ruled by a Sultan in the period of the year 400 to 900? Obviously, you are making things up Duh
@@PHlLlPPlNES well you don’t know about the history Polynesian, Melanesian, Micronesian, and Austronesian. (So keep yapping) These are the first people that migrated to the Philippines you can search it up. Philippines already exist in stone Age era, In fact then Orginal name of the Philippines is called Ma-I and MAJA then turn to Las Islas Felipinas then King Phillip The 3rd rename it into PHILIPPINES. Before china become a chinese nation they’re under the rule of Mongolian empire. Mongolian Empire rule most of the north and half of west. (Yuan Dynasty established in 1200 Mongolian Empire) after that the royal family of Ming established a revolution in 1363-1644 the Ming Dynasty slowly win against the Mongolian empire. So before china claim the whole china sea and draw an imaginary 9dash line Think! We are the first SEA Traders. Other neighbors country like Vietnam, Taiwan, Indonesia, also travel to us to trade their gold, silver in exchange for Goods like Flour, etc. China doesn’t exist before but YUAN Dynasty or Mongolian 🇲🇳 Empire does. There’s no CHINA!!!
@@PHlLlPPlNES Philippines is a tribal nation we don’t have leaders but BARANGAY does. Barangay is old type of ruling a capital and ethic group. This barangay is lead by Sultan, and Rajah.
Correction It is not The South China Sea it is West Philippines Sea, why reporters always calling The near Philippines soil a West Philippine Sea??? 🤔 People around the world who don't know will or confused by that
The earliest name was the South China Sea, and the West Philippine Sea was created by the Philippines and the United States in the last two years. If you don't believe it, you can check the world map before 2015.
@@zethcao11 Sino-Japanese Peace Treaty Article 2 It is recognized under Treaty of Peace with Japan signed at the city of San Francisco, Japan has renounced all right, title and claim to Taiwan and Penghu as well as Spratly Islands and Paracel Islands. both PRC Beijing and ROC Taiwan(especially Kuomingtang) claims same thing since 1940s, because Chinese believe it's WWII order. After South Vietnam navy landed in Paracel islands, PLA defeat and killed 100+ South Vietnam soldiers and retook Paracel Islands in 1974, North Vietnam used to support PRC's claim even sided with PRC in Battle Of Paracel Island After North Vietnam unified South Vietnam with CCP support, Vietcong inherited South Vietnam's claim and landed some Spratly islands, Vietcong expelled Boat people Chinese minority, also signed military treaty with Soviet in 1978, then PLA killed 100,000+ Viet Cong soldiers, militiamen, civilians with real cannon in Third Indochina War 1979-1991, PLA navy also killed 64 Viet Cong soldiers and retook Johnson South Reef Spratly in 1988. win WWIII to rerwrite WWII order, not by naming war
@@zethcao11 The South China Sea belongs to the whole world, but China, Vietnam, Malaysia, Indonesia and the Philippines have all claimed their own claims. The Philippines also believes that the entire South China Sea belongs to the Philippines, and Vietnam also believes that the entire South China Sea belongs to Vietnam. China also believes that the South China Sea belongs to China. We in Malaysia also believe that the boy belongs to Malaysia. Isn't this normal? The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea does not stipulate the ownership of islands. I don't know why the Philippines wants to include our Malaysian territory and islands in its scope?
The South China Sea belongs to the whole world, not the Philippines or China. We in Malaysia also have islands. Why does the Philippines want to monopolize the South China Sea?
NO MATTER HOW CHINA REACTS, PHILIPPINES IS JUST DOING THE RIGHT THING TO SAFEGUARD AND MAINTAIN OUR RIGHTS AND SOVEREIGNTY ON WEST PHILIPPINE SEA. CHINA'S CLAIM AND OWNERSHIP AT WPS IS ILLEGAL. WERE DOING ONLY WHAT IS RIGHT FOR US.
The Philippine is alone in Southeast Asia on this one. No thanks to their Marcos' adamant want to kow-tow to the US, due to his wealth being held by the US government.
Historical rights had no room in this modern day. China's claimed is ridiculous and there is no basis in international maritime law. And even historical rigjts Philippines is more rigjtful owner because Philippines is the land of creations since adam and eve.
- Taiwan is not part of China (when I was in Taiwan, they don't want to be called Chinese, they want to be called Taiwanese) - Hongkong is not part of China (When I was in Hongkong, they didn't want to be called Chinese, they preferred to be called Hongkongers, and they preferred to sing "Glory to Hongkong" than the Chinese anthem) - Tibet is not part of China - Xinjiang is not part of China - Free the Ughyur People in China Camps in Xinjiang - Ughyur People are not Chinese - China must follow the UNCLOS Law - There is no such thing as South China Sea, it should be called Southeast Asian Sea - The 9-dash line is not valid and not legal - Spartly's Island belongs to us South East Asian Nation not to China - West Philippines Sea is for the Philippines not for China - Senkaku Island is part of Japan, not China - Socotra Rock is part of South Korea, not China - Aksai Chin is part of India, not China - Kashmir is part of India, not China - Arunachal Pradesh is part of India, not China - Do Not Trust China - Do not believe in China - China does not respect other countries - China will never be superior to other countries. - Small countries will never be inferior against China. - We will Fight China.
China’s historical claim Is not only flawed but also illegal under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea wherein it is a party too. The Philippines has historic rights claim too but backed by the Convention:
The Philippines defense alliance with the US, Japan, Australia, South Korea, and all like-minded nations to uphold the rule of law and freedom of navigation and overflight in the South China Sea.
The Chinese sovereignty on Nansha（Spratly) Islands was recognised by Potsdam Declaration and Cairo Declaration. And "nine-dash line" was created in 1946 where the Philippines is still under colonisation of the United States of America.
Chinas claim acient? Hahahaha have your read their handbooks? Their territory are clearly stated there before ww2! There are no Southern territories!!!!!!! No south china sea terrotories! Its just recent. Ph proves their lawfull and hostorical claims then suddenly chinese stated they have a acient claims over these waters how insane.😂😂😂😂
My apologies bloomberg news but your resource person definitely have to be educated when it comes to historical claims. Such an idiotic woman to talk about historical claims.
By the way when China first started including the South China Sea in there maps and territories it it during Spanish control of Philippine then through out American occupation of Philippine. Meaning Philippine wasn’t even a country or nation to have the right and capability to lay claim until recently after ww2. Don’t think laying claim to the South China Sea was a CCP thing. The KMT which is the party that created the island of Taiwan that you know today had more than 9 dash of line, the CCP reduced the claimed territories after winning the battle for the mainland. Also there court ruling was ruled by two American judges and 1 Japanese judge which China does not recognised. I am not here to agree or disagree if it is correct for China to not recognise the ruling but I am saying that is there reasoning that the ruling lacked diversity in judge democratic and a lack of Chinese representation to contest the ruling. It was very much the Philippine submitting there argument than the 2 American and one Japanese judge signing it off and there was no debate or actual legal preceding that took place.
What do you mean that the Philippine wasn't even a country until after WW2? Philippines is the oldest republic in Asia. Predating all other countries before they even become a countries. And I dare you to present to us any ancient map of China that shows Scarborough and spratly's islands as their part of their territories. Even in the Qing Dynasty where China's territory are at the most largest expansion of all Dynasty the southernmost territory ended in Hainan Island. Even in China's constitution state that "The territory of the Republic of China continues to be the territory of the former empire. (referring to the Qng Dynasty - Ed)" [China No.2 History Archives, China International Press]
@@ryanbruiz3407 Under a colony they did not persue nor claim the land they are claiming in the south china sea. why? becuase your colonial master did not lay any claim
@@randall_c_6163 Do not embarrassed yourself you do not know what you are talking about. Philippines is the first asian country that established a proper constitutional republic after we won our independence over Spaniards. We have never been a colony or vassals of other states. And don't says that China never been invaded by other countries where in fact eight nation was able to conquered China so we can say China was a colony of this countries.
@@ryanbruiz3407 is the occupation of America just not written in Philippine history ? you have to result to insults where as I am here to educate, is this the Philippine culture and representation you wish to broadcast ? July 4, 1946 Philippine gain independence from the united state. Do you know how many dynasty, republic where form in china and had laid claims and posted military outpost before 1946 in the South china sea? before Philippine was a nation again ? did you know why America even occupy Philippine in the first place ? because America was at war with Spain and took Spanish territory in Philippine. The Americans never gain Philippine independent status. After the American the Japanese occupied Philippine and then the American again until 1946.
China has published baselines for a contested shoal in the South China Sea. The Foreign Ministry on Sunday posted online geographic coordinates for the baselines around Scarborough Shoal.
The enactment of the other two laws is just an excuse to exaggerate the territory. The Philippines wants to invade the islands and territorial waters of Malaysia, Indonesia, Vietnam and China.
@@junweipan24941596 PD is to steal other country's territory by saying those islands are Terra Nullius, No country is there owner. But Philippines is stupid enought to confess Phillipines have no historical rights based on treaties, maps, legal document to support their claims. The 2013 is another stuip action. Phillipine take the case to UNCLOS court to judge the sovereignty and Sovereign right that the court have no jurisdiction. After the rulling, Phillipines send EEZ application to UN but rejected by UN that make Phillipines from a country that have disputed EEZ to a country that have unrecognized EEZ by UN. What a big joke!
After Manila enacted the new laws, China releases baselines of territorial sea adjacent to Huangyan Dao. The CCG vows to strengthen patrols and law enforcement
Malaysia, vietnam, Brunei, Indonesia has no water/sea issue with China except Philippine. It seems no body from the 9 Asean members (Malaysia. Singapore, Indonesia, Brunei, Myanmar, Laos. Vietnam, Thailand Cambodia came out to defend the Fhilippino over the South China Sea dispute)? Actual facts, these 9 Asean members knew the dispute between China and Philippine is the work of the America and they also kbew Philippine is a lackey to US.
Chinese fisherman and survey ships appears and anchored in Luconia Shoals controlled by Malaysia. Vietnamese have dispute with Chinese in Paracel island. Have you forgotten the Johnson South Reef skirmish where 64 Vietnamese soldiers been killed? In Indonesia there is always sighting of Chinese ships in Natuna islands. So don't say that only Philippines have issue with China ofcourse other countries like Myanmar, Laos, Thailand, Cambodia have no problem with China because they are not claimant of these region.
@ryanbruiz3407 Ever since China built the 7 island at South China Sea and drawn the 9 desh line, today there isnt one single of case Filipino pirate robbing of ships in the whole of South China Sea ... Malaysia's Sabah is now a safe tourist destination in Asean ... no more Filipino pirate hijacking .... none, all gone, thank to China costal guards.
@@bah2singtatato116 You are the only one together with your Chinese communist are saying that but the whole world knows the truth that the Chinese are the bully's and the pirate of the high seas and that is the fact.
"China, you have no right to the West Philippine Sea, as the Philippines has been supported by international law. That law is not just for personal interests."
The Philippines is awesome! They directly incorporated our Malaysian territory into the Philippines' jurisdiction. I looked at the Philippines' claims: the islands of Vietnam, China, Malaysia, Indonesia, and Brunei were all incorporated into the Philippines' jurisdiction. Why did the Philippines launch an invasion?
The United States does not abide by international law. Why does it ask China to do so? The Philippines' inclusion of island disputes in the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea is a violation of the Convention. Because the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea will not adjudicate island sovereignty disputes. Because the South China Sea is a disputed area. The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea will not intervene in sovereignty disputes.
It is like watching Chinese short dramas, just producing for the sake of business no sense at all, full of bully, drugs, s*x and etc. That is how I project _________.
My apologies bloomberg news but your resource person definitely have to be educated when it comes to historical claims. Such an idiotic woman to talk about historical claims.
My apologies bloomberg news but your resource person definitely have to be educated when it comes to historical claims. Such an idiotic woman to talk about historical claims.
My apologies bloomberg news but your resource person definitely have to be educated when it comes to historical claims. Such an idiotic woman to talk about historical claims.
My apologies bloomberg news but your resource person definitely have to be educated when it comes to historical claims. Such an idiotic woman to talk about historical claims.
My apologies bloomberg news but your resource person definitely have to be educated when it comes to historical claims. Such an idiotic woman to talk about historical claims.
My apologies bloomberg news but your resource person definitely have to be educated when it comes to historical claims. Such an idiotic woman to talk about historical claims.
My apologies bloomberg news but your resource person definitely have to be educated when it comes to historical claims. Such an idiotic woman to talk about historical claims.
My apologies bloomberg news but your resource person definitely have to be educated when it comes to historical claims. Such an idiotic woman to talk about historical claims.
My apologies bloomberg news but your resource person definitely have to be educated when it comes to historical claims. Such an idiotic woman to talk about historical claims.
My apologies bloomberg news but your resource person definitely have to be educated when it comes to historical claims. Such an idiotic woman to talk about historical claims.
That "since the Han dynasty" bs is ridiculous! If the Chinese think they had a strong claim because their ancestors had been fishing there while they were busy breaking up, reuniting, breaking up and the cycle goes on. In that case, the Filipinos have a stronger claim because their ancestors were not only fishing there but they were also bathing & swimming there for recreation because it's literally a backyard pool (Spratlys & Scarborough) for the Filipinos.
When the Chinese showed up at least 1000 years ago and for sure 500 years ago
They had to go to Luzon to find your Filipino ancestors
Their Chinese ancestors probably said these disputed islands ours to facilitate trade
Your ancestors probably went okay na lang thank you sir come again siiiiiirrrrr
The Spanish, Japanese and Americans committed vvar cri mes and acts of gen o cide on the Philippines yet they are the countries you b egg for help these days
The Chinese should actually learn from that
What’s the point in making all these, ships, planes WMDs if you don’t test them out
👇
The Chinese Treasure Fleet in 15th century Philippines
* It was the people of our archipelago who discovered Magellan and the Europeans in 1521, not the other way around, as most Filipinos were taught by our grade-school textbooks. Our islands and their inhabitants were well-known to a larger, richer world that of Chinese emperors and scholars and Arab traders, as early as the 9th, even 6th centuries. And certainly by 1000 A.D., our shores were regular ports of call in the trade with China, then the most powerful nation on earth.
Chinese chronicles, European archaeologists and the diggings in our pre-colonial burial grounds prove that those ancient Filipinos used fine porcelain, weights and measures imported from China, and recorded written contracts. Chao-Ju-Kua reported that Chinese traders visited Ma-I (Luzon) regularly, leaving silks, porcelain and metal utensils on the beaches of designated islands, and returning weeks later to collect payment in the form of beeswax, gold dust, carabao horn, ginger, cinnamon or garlic. It was an import-export system run on a reliable honor system with unquestioned good faith.
* When Magellan’s Spanish Armada hove into view in March 1521, the natives of Homonhon in the Visayas must have taken pity on the small black ships with tattered sails and scruffy, starving, disoriented sailors, for they sent a small rowboat packed with rice, coconuts and bananas to their rescue. On the next island, the white, bearded strangers were feted in a bamboo palace with a banquet of roast fish, pork, turtle eggs and palm wine, by a native king whose queen wore a black-and-white gown, red lips and nails, while a quartet of young, topless damsels played music on various gongs and drums.
Those early Filipinos had been more accustomed to the tall, prosperous, Chinese ships with a trio of feathery sails stiffened with battens, for the China trade had been in place for at least 500 years. During the Ming Dynasty, Filipinos enjoyed the visits of the Treasure Fleet (1405-1500) of Admiral Cheng Ho (Zhen He) a huge, 7-ft tall, powerful eunuch, who had built 1,500 massive, 500-ft ships in a giant shipyard in Nanking with the help of 30,000 workers. The luxurious ships, each manned by 1,000 sailors ruled the South Pacific and the Indian Ocean.
* But the Chinese were not interested in conquest or territorial aggrandizement. Their purposes were trade and diplomacy. That was what our ancestors expected when they first saw the Spanish Armada.
Filipinos had never seen white men before Magellan and never thought the strangers would be as rapacious and predatory as they would prove to be. They assumed the new foreigners to be poor and needy because they had only glass beads, a string of little bells and a red cap (Magellan’s gifts) to reciprocate the native prodigality. The white men were, in fact, so dazzled by the earrings, chains, armlets and anklets, of pure gold, worn by both the native men and women that Magellan had to warn them against showing their covetousness.
Philstar
Philippine once was colonized by US, it's making more sense that US claim the water rather than Philippine.😂
@@SS-dc5jz the difference there is that the US signed an agreement to relinquish their control over the Philippines, that agreement is called the Tydings Mcduffie law. So by US law, the US has relinquished all its Philippine territories to the government of the Philippines
If they intend to use the Han dynasty map then they need to give Tibet and most of western China away because according to the Han dynasty map, Western parts of modern China is not part of China
China will join Malaysia and Indonesia in opposing the Philippines' aggression. Why doesn't the Philippines think about being excluded in ASEAN? An aggressive country.
With the new laws, the Philippines 🇵🇭 will be able to *board and arrest* Chinese vessels, maritime militias or Coast Guard, not operating on the defined sea lanes within the Philippine's EEZ.
@@lastChang the problem is enforcement pcg and phil. navy has limited vessel to arrest the ccg and people's liberation army/ navy
When paper laws meet the law of nature. Law of Nature always win. China learned this game from the West when once upon a time the West bullied them and took territories like Hong Kong.
@@PabloNaidasjrthe CCG is military by nature,
@@PabloNaidasjr One at a time. Allies should be able to enforce the UNCLOS Rule.
*International laws* are very clear on the South China Sea:
- parts of it belong to some ASEAN countries including the Philippines 🇵🇭,
- the rest of it is the international water,
- no part of it belongs to China🇨🇳 or Taiwan🇹🇼.
@@ArabicReja973
Except the Chinese didn’t have to recognize that tribunal
In any event they ruled no one exhibited continuous control over disputed islands so everyone is digging into the islands they control including China and the Philippines
👇
Article 295
Exhaustion of local remedies
Any dispute between States Parties concerning the interpretation or application of this Convention may be submitted to the procedures provided for in this section only after local remedies have been exhausted where this is required by international law.
Article 296
Finality and binding force of decisions
1. Any decision rendered by a court or tribunal having jurisdiction under this section shall be final and shall be complied with by all the parties to the dispute.
2. Any such decision shall have no binding force except between the parties and in respect of that particular dispute.
SECTION 3. LIMITATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS
TO APPLICABILITY OF SECTION 2
Article 297
Limitations on applicability of section 2
1. Disputes concerning the interpretation or application of this Convention with regard to the exercise by a coastal State of its sovereign rights or jurisdiction provided for in this Convention shall be subject to the procedures provided for in section 2 in the following cases:
(a) when it is alleged that a coastal State has acted in contravention of the provisions of this Convention in regard to the freedoms and rights of navigation, overflight or the laying of submarine cables and pipelines, or in regard to other internationally lawful uses of the sea specified in article 58;
(b) when it is alleged that a State in exercising the aforementioned freedoms, rights or uses has acted in contravention of this Convention or of laws or regulations adopted by the coastal State in conformity with this Convention and other rules of international law not incompatible with this Convention; or
(c) when it is alleged that a coastal State has acted in contravention of specified international rules and standards for the protection and preservation of the marine environment which are applicable to the coastal State and which have been established by this Convention or through a competent international organization or diplomatic conference in accordance with this Convention.
2. (a) Disputes concerning the interpretation or application of the provisions of this Convention with regard to marine scientific research shall be settled in accordance with section 2, except that the coastal State shall not be obliged to accept the submission to such settlement of any dispute arising out of:
(i) the exercise by the coastal State of a right or discretion in accordance with article 246; or
(ii) a decision by the coastal State to order suspension or cessation of a research project in accordance with article 253.
(b) A dispute arising from an allegation by the researching State that with respect to a specific project the coastal State is not exercising its rights under articles 246 and 253 in a manner compatible with this Convention shall be submitted, at the request of either party, to conciliation under Annex V, section 2, provided that the conciliation commission shall not call in question the exercise by the coastal State of its discretion to designate specific areas as referred to in article 246, paragraph 6, or of its discretion to withhold consent in accordance with article 246, paragraph 5.
3. (a) Disputes concerning the interpretation or application of the provisions of this Convention with regard to fisheries shall be settled in accordance with section 2, except that the coastal State shall not be obliged to accept the submission to such settlement of any dispute relating to its sovereign rights with respect to the living resources in the exclusive economic zone or their exercise, including its discretionary powers for determining the allowable catch, its harvesting capacity, the allocation of surpluses to other States and the terms and conditions established in its conservation and management laws and regulations.
(b) Where no settlement has been reached by recourse to section 1 of this Part, a dispute shall be submitted to conciliation under Annex V, section 2, at the request of any party to the dispute, when it is alleged that:
(i) a coastal State has manifestly failed to comply with its obligations to ensure through proper conservation and management measures that the maintenance of the living resources in the exclusive economic zone is not seriously endangered;
(ii) a coastal State has arbitrarily refused to determine, at the request of another State, the allowable catch and its capacity to harvest living resources with respect to stocks which that other State is interested in fishing; or
(iii) a coastal State has arbitrarily refused to allocate to any State, under articles 62, 69 and 70 and under the terms and conditions established by the coastal State consistent with this Convention, the whole or part of the surplus it has declared to exist.
(c) In no case shall the conciliation commission substitute its discretion for that of the coastal State.
(d) The report of the conciliation commission shall be communicated to the appropriate international organizations.
(e) In negotiating agreements pursuant to articles 69 and 70, States Parties, unless they otherwise agree, shall include a clause on measures which they shall take in order to minimize the possibility of a disagreement concerning the interpretation or application of the agreement, and on how they should proceed if a disagreement nevertheless arises.
Article 298
Optional exceptions to applicability of section 2
1. When signing, ratifying or acceding to this Convention or at any time thereafter, a State may, without prejudice to the obligations arising under section 1, declare in writing that it does not accept any one or more of the procedures provided for in section 2 with respect to one or more of the following categories of disputes:
(a) (i) disputes concerning the interpretation or application of articles 15, 74 and 83 relating to sea boundary delimitations, or those involving historic bays or titles, provided that a State having made such a declaration shall, when such a dispute arises subsequent to the entry into force of this Convention and where no agreement within a reasonable period of time is reached in negotiations between the parties, at the request of any party to the dispute, accept submission of the matter to conciliation under Annex V, section 2; and provided further that any dispute that necessarily involves the concurrent consideration of any unsettled dispute concerning sovereignty or other rights over continental or insular land territory shall be excluded from such submission;
(ii) after the conciliation commission has presented its report, which shall state the reasons on which it is based, the parties shall negotiate an agreement on the basis of that report; if these negotiations do not result in an agreement, the parties shall, by mutual consent, submit the question to one of the procedures provided for in section 2, unless the parties otherwise agree;
(iii) this subparagraph does not apply to any sea boundary dispute finally settled by an arrangement between the parties, or to any such dispute which is to be settled in accordance with a bilateral or multilateral agreement binding upon those parties;
(b) disputes concerning military activities, including military activities by government vessels and aircraft engaged in non-commercial service, and disputes concerning law enforcement activities in regard to the exercise of sovereign rights or jurisdiction excluded from the jurisdiction of a court or tribunal under article 297, paragraph 2 or 3;
(c) disputes in respect of which the Security Council of the United Nations is exercising the functions assigned to it by the Charter of the United Nations, unless the Security Council decides to remove the matter from its agenda or calls upon the parties to settle it by the means provided for in this Convention.
2. A State Party which has made a declaration under paragraph 1 may at any time withdraw it, or agree to submit a dispute excluded by such declaration to any procedure specified in this Convention.
3. A State Party which has made a declaration under paragraph 1 shall not be entitled to submit any dispute falling within the excepted category of disputes to any procedure in this Convention as against another State Party, without the consent of that party.
4. If one of the States Parties has made a declaration under paragraph 1(a), any other State Party may submit any dispute falling within an excepted category against the declarant party to the procedure specified in such declaration.
5. A new declaration, or the withdrawal of a declaration, does not in any way affect proceedings pending before a court or tribunal in accordance with this article, unless the parties otherwise agree.
6. Declarations and notices of withdrawal of declarations under this article shall be deposited with the Secretary-General of the United Nations, who shall transmit copies thereof to the States Parties.
Article 299
Right of the parties to agree upon a procedure
1. A dispute excluded under article 297 or excepted by a declaration made under article 298 from the dispute settlement procedures provided for in section 2 may be submitted to such procedures only by agreement of the parties to the dispute.
2. Nothing in this section impairs the right of the parties to the dispute to agree to some other procedure for the settlement of such dispute or to reach an amicable settlement.
UN . ORG
WPS pilipinas 🇵🇭 territory not china fake
Why did the Philippines invade the islands of Vietnam, Malaysia and China?
Murillo Maps is The oldest Maps of all,the Evidence WPS are belongs to the Philippines,china historical claims is Elementary child drawing China Modern Maps 😅
Based on xi jin ping s fantasy, greed and bullying capability.
The Philippines were in ancient China maps which are much older than the Murillo maps.
@johntwohy8337 if there's an Ancient China maps, it's a Maps a secret maps of china and became forever a secret maps,The china claims in Tribunal no maps presented as legal basis claims,😆
@@johntwohy8337if Philippines is under the China map Which is older than the Phil map then, that is not Philippines
@@zethcao11 You are right. Philippines was not yet a colony. The map was dated much earlier than the the year the Spaniards colonized the archipelago.
THE WORLD KNOWS that the Philippine Claim is LEGAL and BINDING -- UNCLOS
China's claim is not.
Where in the International Law that 9-line or 10-line is legal ? -- None.
Historical Basis -- The magnificent map of the Philippine archipelago, drawn by the Jesuit Father Pedro Murillo Velarde in Manila in 1734.
The other way round. Phillpines is against the international laws.
According to UNCLOS, Philippines have no legal grounds to issue the 2 new laws.
According to UNCLOS, Phillpines send EEZ application in the South China Sea, but the EEZ application had been rejected by UN that make Philippine have no EEZ recognized by UN. Phillipine have issued 2 illegal laws that against UN's official decision.
@@terancekwwong7878 - International laws are very clear on the South China Sea:
- parts of it belong to some ASEAN countries including the Philippines 🇵🇭,
- the rest of it is the international water,
- no part of it belongs to China🇨🇳 .
@@joelvalenzuela981 You stop sending out this AI Fake message. My pervious post your replied clearly stated according to UNCLOS, Phillpines's application on the EEZ in the South China Sea had been rejected by UN. According to UNCLOS, Phillpines is against UNCLOS in setting the new laws applied to the UNs Unrecognized EEZ.
@@terancekwwong7878 If that's the case, why did China lose in the Arbitral? what are you crying about?
@@yayeltvChina losing Nothing. Phillpines paid the bills for the tribunal and change from "Disputed EEZ" to "Unrecognized EEZ from UN". This is what you said Phillpines winning an Unrecognized EEZ from UN! Who need to cry.
This situation is quite absurd. Under international law, specifically the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), the Philippines lacks the legal basis to enact the two new laws in question.
The Philippines submitted an application for an Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) in the South China Sea; however, this application was rejected by the United Nations, resulting in the absence of any recognized EEZ for the Philippines in that region.
Consequently, the Philippines has enacted two laws that are not only unlawful but also stem from unfounded assumptions, contradicting the UN's official stance of not recognizing any Philippine EEZ in the South China Sea.
It is a shame for the Philippines government to state the new laws are based on UNCLOS where the UNCLOS never recognized Philippines have a legal EEZ in the South China Sea.
Han Dynasty 😅, filipinos are there since king Solomon visited Ophir aka Philippines
@@gravedanger5771 I agree to that.. This nation was once called OPHIR. We are OPHIRIAN...
China has produced the world's oldest map to prove which island is Huangyan Island. The Philippines is just a strategic pawn of the United States.
If china claims it by history, then mongolia can claim china by history.
Chinese didn't get in there until the 90s when the US left. US used those island as target practice when the US Air base in the philippines were operational. This Joseph Estrsda fault being corrupt and not agreed upon the deal and closed the US base.
That is not true. The region is named South China Sea on the map. Did you see Philippines on the map?
@@Summerland357if it ain't true then why are you fuming? It's inconvenient to you because that's the truth 😂
Murillo Maps is The oldest Maps of all,evedence WPS are belongs to the Philippines, china claims no basis
@@RomaVilla-q6k well the truth is that In 2022, after Biden warned Marcos Jr. that the U.S. would block his access to his father’s allegedly corrupt inheritance held in U.S. banks if he didn’t cooperate, Marcos began stirring up issues in the region.
Remove the ccg
Naturally china will be angry simply because the Philippines will never give them an inch of Philippine territory 😅😅
God Blessed the Philippines 🇵🇭 mabuhay ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤ mabuhay President Bong bong Marcos 💖 may the lord guide you always we love you ❤❤❤thank you ikaw ang aming Pangulo ng Pilipinas
Pls get out WPS our Philippines sovereignty
China loves to imagine that everything "belongs to em"🤣😅🤣🤣🤣🤣 why dont the communist rename thier country as WEST TAIWAN SINCE ACIENT TIME🤣😅🤣🤣🤣
You don't know that Taiwan claims 11dashline?
@@lvjinbin28 Filipinos dont even know about their own country
If they do so, you would be East Spain/US..... aw wait, you are actually east US lapdog....
FYI; the recent two new Law's of the philippines is base and drawn on International Law's and maritime rules of the Sea. 2016 Permanent Court of Arbitration favored to the philippines and UNCLOS ( EEZ ) and Treaty of Washington 1900 . The new Law's just defined extent and assert there rights in accordance of international Law's and social Norm's lastly as a sovereign country.
FYI, According to 1596 Presidential Decrees Year 1978, Philippines acquired the islands in the South China Sea on the reason of Terra nullius, including Philippines, no country is the owner of those islands and maritime water. That is a fact that the 1596 PD confessed Phillipines have no treaty (including Washington treaty), no map, no legal document to support the sovereign right and Sovereight on those areas.
FYI, if the 2016 rulling is favour Philippines and recongozed by UN, Philippines should have a recognized EEZ from UN in the Sourh China Sea. However the application of the EEZ from Phillipines to UN had been rejected. That means UN never recognize Philippines have any EEZ in the South China Sea that make the two new laws are illegal and violate the UNCLOS and international law.
@@terancekwwong7878 ccp comment spotted
@@terancekwwong7878 the victory of the Philippines is legal and supported by all countries, China's claim is theft against international law.
China draws 9 dash line like kindergarten, so disgusting and funny
the smelly Vachina is a liar.
You Filipinos get out of Malaysia's islands, invaders. You occupied Vietnam, China, Malaysia's islands. We hate invaders.
it was Taiwan drew 11 dashline 1947
USA and CHINA 😂😂😂😂
@@babyblue8891 no one accepts the Chinese 9 dash line claims
👇
The US Is Claiming One Million Square Kilometers Of New Land
An area the size of California
Medium
👇
Timeline of the South China Sea dispute
* It has been claimed by the People's Republic of China on the argument that since 200 BCE Chinese fishermen have used the Spratly islands
* Naval forces of the Liu Song dynasty (420-479 CE) patrolled the Paracel and Spratly islands.[5] In the Tang dynasty (618-907 CE), the islands were placed under the administration and authority of the Qiongzhou Prefecture (now Hainan Province).[5] The Chinese administration of the South China Sea continued into the Song dynasty (960-1279 CE).[5]
* Archaeologists have found Chinese made potteries porcelains and other historical relics from the Southern dynasties (420-589 CE), the Sui dynasty (581-619 CE), the Tang dynasty, the Song dynasty, the Yuan dynasty (1271-1368 CE), the Ming dynasty (1368-1644 CE) and later eras up to modern times on the South China Sea islands.[5]
1876 - China makes its earliest documented claim to the Paracel Islands[citation needed]
1883 - When the Spratlys and Paracels were surveyed by Germany in 1883, China issued protests.
1887 - In the 19th century, Europeans found that Chinese fishermen from Hainan annually visited the Spratly islands for part of the year, while in 1877 it was the British who launched the first modern legal claims to the Spratlys
1902 - China sends naval forces on inspection tours of the Paracel Islands to preempt French claims.[28] Scholar François-Xavier Bonnet argued that per Chinese records, these expeditions never occurred and were backdated during the 1970s.[29][30]
1907 - China sends another naval force, this time to plan for resource exploitation.[28]
1911 - The newly formed Republic of China, successor state to the Qing dynasty, moves administration of the Paracel Islands to Hainan,[28] which would not become a separate Chinese province until 1988.
1946 - The R.O.C. established garrisons on both Woody (now Yongxing / 永兴) Island in the Paracels and Taiping Island in the Spratlys. France protested.
The French tried but failed to dislodge Chinese nationalist troops from Yongxing Island/Woody Island (the only habitable island in the Paracels), but were able to establish a small camp on Pattle (now Shanhu / 珊瑚) Island in the southwestern part of the archipelago.[37][38][39] The Republic of China drew up The Southern China Sea Islands Location Map, marking the national boundaries in the sea with 11 lines, two of which were later removed, showing the U-shaped claim on the entire South China Sea, and showing the Spratly and Paracels in Chinese territory, in 1947.[28]
The Americans reminded the Philippines at its independence in 1946 that the Spratlys was not Philippine territory, both to not anger Chiang Kai-shek in China and because the Spratlys were not part of the Philippines per the 1898 treaty Spain signed with America.[38]
1950 - After the Chinese nationalists were driven from Hainan by the People's Liberation Army (PLA), they withdrew their garrisons in both the Paracels and Spratlys to Taiwan.
1969 - A UN sponsored research team discovers oil under the sea floor of the island group.
1970 - China occupies Amphitrite Group of the Paracel Islands
* In 1596, the Spanish Colonial Government declared that each island in the Kalayaan Islands, now known as the Spratly Islands, had Barangay or Barrio status.
1971 - Philippines announces claim to islands adjacent to its territory in the Spratlys, which they named Kalayaan, which was formally incorporated into Palawan Province in 1972. The Philippines President Marcos announced the claims after Taiwanese troops attacked and shot at a Philippine fishing boat on Itu Aba.[
Wikipedia
The 9 dash line drawing of Vachina is funny and the kindergarten can draw well.
Because there are Chinese fishermen living on the island, you only see favorable opinions about the Philippines on RUclips, but the news you see on TIKTOK is completely different from that on RUclips. Malaysia, Vietnam, China and Indonesia all hate the Philippines' aggressive behavior.
Just like you can't know the tragic situation in Gaza from RUclips.
@@junweipan2494 agtagtagainep daytoy a tao
Go to take a look the dash line between Greek and Turkey. Greece had entirely the whole Aegean Sea. These dash lines are legal and never changed after the UNCLOS.
Any country should have 12 Nmiles according to UNCLOS. Turkey had applied for 6 NMiles (not 12 NMiles) from 3 NMiles. But the application had been rejected by UN because UNCLOS cannot supersede sovereign right and Sovereight before UNCLOS.
The 9 dash line is sovereignty and sovereign rights before UNCLOS.
It's also known as the first island chain line.
Why the UN didn't do nothing of the 2countries quarreling in the WPS/SCS?
If Philippines had a problem with chinese in Philippine sea why they didn’t know that chinese had a big mining in Bicol province of manila heard that no pilipinos work inside the said mining is there any malicious thing happening inside?
Why not we ask magellan the Portuguese geographer landed in Cebu in 1500? philippine is already existed in year 400AD pre historic up to 900AD-1500 colonial Era? Those Shoal are shared with multiple traders and fishermen not until this china wants to claim the whole Southeast Asia Sea. They’re feeling entitled because our politicians failed to protect our sovereign rights. Kudos to Marcos for having balls to protect and maintain the balance peace.
Indonesia and Philippines are closest austronesian brothers as you can see indo and filipino have similarities.
But those islands were discovered and named by the Chinese. China had already named them before the Philippines was established. It's just that the Philippines wants to expand its territory. As a Malaysian, I hate the Philippines' aggressive behavior. In Asia, China, Vietnam and Malaysia have all had their islands invaded by the Philippines.
@@junweipan2494 aggression? Who is making an agression in the WPS? your warfreak CCG
@@junweipan2494 He must agreed that Philippines did not existed (as a whole country) 2000 year ago right? So there must be a lot of small counties or small groups of people in the area. What is the rationale behind to think all of them recognize nowadays Phillipines is country. Why not some group of people already settled in Malaysia and they want to distinguish themself not the people of Philippines? Why not these Malaysian have no legal rights to claim the whole Phillipines as Malaysian''s territory? It is the same bullshir rationale that he think the nowadays Phillipines can claim the South China Sea as well as the territories of east Malaysia.Then he have to agreed those Indonesian, Malaysian, Singaporen etc etc to have legal rights to cliam Philippines as thier territory.
You should ask why Americans let China take over the South China Sea in 1946.
@@junweipan2494 what you talking about yes we don’t have governmental system 2000 years ago but we do have Barangays ruled by Sultan Kings, DaTu, Rajah, and Lakan. But in year 1898 we did have created settlement to establish government system. Malaysia is far ahead of us back then. Your country even claim our Sabah that sultanate of sulu use for “RENT”
Tagalog tribe and sultanate of sulu is the first people who rule our country but let me clarify that we are Trader, and fishermen, sea travelers, and warrior. Back then
Like what happening last month Sulatanate of SuLu and Mindanaoan is officially created their own parliamentarian government but they are under control by upper ruler which is by the Luzonian Government. Your country owe us some money you have to pay your rent to sulatanatw of Sulu!!! otherwise You’re country have same interests claiming that doesn’t belong to them like china.
I guess since Philippines was founded in 23 Jan 1899, China probably can claim they do own the season before 1898.. 😂
Founded? you meant owned by Spain?
that reefs belong to Philippine until Chinese pirates steal in 2012 to reduce the tension ph warship and china warship should left but Chinese pirates comeback and steal the reef.
@@bitcoinmonitor7144 Trung Quốc là những tên cướp biển 🏴☠️ người Trung Quốc đã cướp quần đảo hoàng sa của chúng tôi vào năm 1974 với sự làm ngơ của Hoa Kỳ
Unfortunately, you don't study history! This line was drawn together by the United States and China!
Chinese WuMaos going wild in this one. Gonna justify why the entire world belongs to Xina.
China is just testing Filipinos patience...they clearly know they don't own wps..
It's just their greediness....thats working...
Minmin is so pretty
God bless Philippines!
400AD up to 900AD we don’t have a government because our country is ruled by Mactan, sultan, and Tagalog tribe. Not until the spanish colonization in year 1500 they completely controlled and conquered us. In year 1800 the first filipino revolution has established mostly started by Tagalog Tribe or Tondo tribe. Government system only happened in year 1898 we are still under control by the USA because we are sold by the spanish government to the USA.
So those freaking Chinese are dreaming because most of Filipino are Sea travelers and trader. We trade silver, gold, materials, goods, and more.
Just like Taiwan, this is self-inflicted problem.
By declaring the Philippines imaginary laws.
It gave China no choice but to enforce and take drastic action. 😮
Muslim colonizers invaded the Philippines in the 1400s, Prior to Muslim colonization, there were NO SULTANS in the Philippines. So why did you claim that the country was ruled by a Sultan in the period of the year 400 to 900? Obviously, you are making things up Duh
当你还是一个部落文明的时候，中国已经有能力去那里捕鱼，而不是侵略你和奴役你。但现在你声称对那个地方拥有主权，这太荒谬了
@@PHlLlPPlNES well you don’t know about the history Polynesian, Melanesian, Micronesian, and Austronesian. (So keep yapping) These are the first people that migrated to the Philippines you can search it up. Philippines already exist in stone Age era, In fact then Orginal name of the Philippines is called Ma-I and MAJA then turn to Las Islas Felipinas then King Phillip The 3rd rename it into PHILIPPINES.
Before china become a chinese nation they’re under the rule of Mongolian empire. Mongolian Empire rule most of the north and half of west. (Yuan Dynasty established in 1200 Mongolian Empire) after that the royal family of Ming established a revolution in 1363-1644 the Ming Dynasty slowly win against the Mongolian empire. So before china claim the whole china sea and draw an imaginary 9dash line Think! We are the first SEA Traders. Other neighbors country like Vietnam, Taiwan, Indonesia, also travel to us to trade their gold, silver in exchange for Goods like Flour, etc. China doesn’t exist before but YUAN Dynasty or Mongolian 🇲🇳 Empire does. There’s no CHINA!!!
@@PHlLlPPlNES Philippines is a tribal nation we don’t have leaders but BARANGAY does. Barangay is old type of ruling a capital and ethic group. This barangay is lead by Sultan, and Rajah.
CHINA IS SO GREEDY! COME ON XIJINPING! YOU ARE FULL OF GREEDINESS
WPS is a Phillipine territory not a Chinese territory!
Godbless philippines❤❤❤
What do you mean Philippine claim was very recent ? or you mean CHINA's claim was very recent, please make it clear........ lol
Correction It is not The South China Sea it is West Philippines Sea, why reporters always calling The near Philippines soil a West Philippine Sea??? 🤔 People around the world who don't know will or confused by that
The earliest name was the South China Sea, and the West Philippine Sea was created by the Philippines and the United States in the last two years.
If you don't believe it, you can check the world map before 2015.
@@junweipan2494because of that Chinese misinterpreted the China Sea and they thought that it is their own - in your dream
@@zethcao11 Sino-Japanese Peace Treaty
Article 2
It is recognized under Treaty of Peace with Japan signed at the city of San Francisco, Japan has renounced all right, title and claim to Taiwan and Penghu as well as Spratly Islands and Paracel Islands.
both PRC Beijing and ROC Taiwan(especially Kuomingtang) claims same thing since 1940s, because Chinese believe it's WWII order.
After South Vietnam navy landed in Paracel islands, PLA defeat and killed 100+ South Vietnam soldiers and retook Paracel Islands in 1974, North Vietnam used to support PRC's claim even sided with PRC in Battle Of Paracel Island
After North Vietnam unified South Vietnam with CCP support, Vietcong inherited South Vietnam's claim and landed some Spratly islands, Vietcong expelled Boat people Chinese minority, also signed military treaty with Soviet in 1978, then PLA killed 100,000+ Viet Cong soldiers, militiamen, civilians with real cannon in Third Indochina War 1979-1991, PLA navy also killed 64 Viet Cong soldiers and retook Johnson South Reef Spratly in 1988.
win WWIII to rerwrite WWII order, not by naming war
@@zethcao11 The South China Sea belongs to the whole world, but China, Vietnam, Malaysia, Indonesia and the Philippines have all claimed their own claims. The Philippines also believes that the entire South China Sea belongs to the Philippines, and Vietnam also believes that the entire South China Sea belongs to Vietnam. China also believes that the South China Sea belongs to China. We in Malaysia also believe that the boy belongs to Malaysia. Isn't this normal? The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea does not stipulate the ownership of islands. I don't know why the Philippines wants to include our Malaysian territory and islands in its scope?
The South China Sea belongs to the whole world, not the Philippines or China. We in Malaysia also have islands. Why does the Philippines want to monopolize the South China Sea?
long live philippines
NO MATTER HOW CHINA REACTS, PHILIPPINES IS JUST DOING THE RIGHT THING TO SAFEGUARD AND MAINTAIN OUR RIGHTS AND SOVEREIGNTY ON WEST PHILIPPINE SEA. CHINA'S CLAIM AND OWNERSHIP AT WPS IS ILLEGAL. WERE DOING ONLY WHAT IS RIGHT FOR US.
@@fredmedina2769
long live Pilippines
Who the hell is china to mingle in our country
@ just being China. There is nothing you and your country can do anything about it.
是你爸爸
God bless
The Philippine is alone in Southeast Asia on this one. No thanks to their Marcos' adamant want to kow-tow to the US, due to his wealth being held by the US government.
MAO NING SHOULD LOOK AT UNCLOS LAW NOT THEIR OWN LAW WHICH CHINA IS ALSO AN UNCLOS SIGNATORY.
Defend our territory
Historical rights had no room in this modern day. China's claimed is ridiculous and there is no basis in international maritime law. And even historical rigjts Philippines is more rigjtful owner because Philippines is the land of creations since adam and eve.
- Taiwan is not part of China
(when I was in Taiwan, they don't want to be called Chinese, they want to be called Taiwanese)
- Hongkong is not part of China
(When I was in Hongkong, they didn't want to be called Chinese, they preferred to be called Hongkongers, and they preferred to sing "Glory to Hongkong" than the Chinese anthem)
- Tibet is not part of China
- Xinjiang is not part of China
- Free the Ughyur People in China Camps in Xinjiang
- Ughyur People are not Chinese
- China must follow the UNCLOS Law
- There is no such thing as South China Sea, it should be called Southeast Asian Sea
- The 9-dash line is not valid and not legal
- Spartly's Island belongs to us South East Asian Nation not to China
- West Philippines Sea is for the Philippines not for China
- Senkaku Island is part of Japan, not China
- Socotra Rock is part of South Korea, not China
- Aksai Chin is part of India, not China
- Kashmir is part of India, not China
- Arunachal Pradesh is part of India, not China
- Do Not Trust China
- Do not believe in China
- China does not respect other countries
- China will never be superior to other countries.
- Small countries will never be inferior against China.
- We will Fight China.
Report should be base on Facts, truthfulness, accuracy, clarity and no bias against anyone. particular
China’s historical claim
Is not only flawed but also illegal under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea wherein it is a party too. The Philippines has historic rights claim too but backed by the Convention:
联合国有核弹吗😅
@@allli-p4c study first, you're embarrassing.
The Philippines defense alliance with the US, Japan, Australia, South Korea, and all like-minded nations to uphold the rule of law and freedom of navigation and overflight in the South China Sea.
Chinese squter land graber illuted by drawing 9-line and change again more 10-10=0
The Chinese sovereignty on Nansha（Spratly) Islands was recognised by Potsdam Declaration and Cairo Declaration. And "nine-dash line" was created in 1946 where the Philippines is still under colonisation of the United States of America.
Historical? Is just a BS to claim other territory 😂
Trump to the rescue and show the bully
China land mass vs Philippines = 1 China. China vs Philippines syrategic location . Philippines 10
There's no han dynasty in that part of sea ever since.
The philippines had all the time to develop the area before! Why contest now only! 😂😂
heee bakit nadyan parin mga china costgard ano gingawa nio mga nakapwestO
Chinese pirates strike again
Chinas claim acient? Hahahaha have your read their handbooks? Their territory are clearly stated there before ww2! There are no Southern territories!!!!!!! No south china sea terrotories! Its just recent. Ph proves their lawfull and hostorical claims then suddenly chinese stated they have a acient claims over these waters how insane.😂😂😂😂
Turf
My apologies bloomberg news but your resource person definitely have to be educated when it comes to historical claims. Such an idiotic woman to talk about historical claims.
She got there on her looks ??
What other explanations are possible??
Xi dynasty so nasty
By the way when China first started including the South China Sea in there maps and territories it it during Spanish control of Philippine then through out American occupation of Philippine. Meaning Philippine wasn’t even a country or nation to have the right and capability to lay claim until recently after ww2. Don’t think laying claim to the South China Sea was a CCP thing. The KMT which is the party that created the island of Taiwan that you know today had more than 9 dash of line, the CCP reduced the claimed territories after winning the battle for the mainland. Also there court ruling was ruled by two American judges and 1 Japanese judge which China does not recognised. I am not here to agree or disagree if it is correct for China to not recognise the ruling but I am saying that is there reasoning that the ruling lacked diversity in judge democratic and a lack of Chinese representation to contest the ruling. It was very much the Philippine submitting there argument than the 2 American and one Japanese judge signing it off and there was no debate or actual legal preceding that took place.
What do you mean that the Philippine wasn't even a country until after WW2? Philippines is the oldest republic in Asia. Predating all other countries before they even become a countries. And I dare you to present to us any ancient map of China that shows Scarborough and spratly's islands as their part of their territories. Even in the Qing Dynasty where China's territory are at the most largest expansion of all Dynasty the southernmost territory ended in Hainan Island. Even in China's constitution state that "The territory of the Republic of China continues to be the territory of the former empire. (referring to the Qng Dynasty - Ed)" [China No.2 History Archives, China International Press]
@@ryanbruiz3407 Philippine was not a country under american and spanish occupation. It was a colony
@@ryanbruiz3407 Under a colony they did not persue nor claim the land they are claiming in the south china sea. why? becuase your colonial master did not lay any claim
@@randall_c_6163 Do not embarrassed yourself you do not know what you are talking about. Philippines is the first asian country that established a proper constitutional republic after we won our independence over Spaniards. We have never been a colony or vassals of other states. And don't says that China never been invaded by other countries where in fact eight nation was able to conquered China so we can say China was a colony of this countries.
@@ryanbruiz3407 is the occupation of America just not written in Philippine history ? you have to result to insults where as I am here to educate, is this the Philippine culture and representation you wish to broadcast ? July 4, 1946 Philippine gain independence from the united state. Do you know how many dynasty, republic where form in china and had laid claims and posted military outpost before 1946 in the South china sea? before Philippine was a nation again ? did you know why America even occupy Philippine in the first place ? because America was at war with Spain and took Spanish territory in Philippine. The Americans never gain Philippine independent status. After the American the Japanese occupied Philippine and then the American again until 1946.
China has published baselines for a contested shoal in the South China Sea. The Foreign Ministry on Sunday posted online geographic coordinates for the baselines around Scarborough Shoal.
the smelly Vachina is a liar
Philippines gonna pull out their wangchung.
@@lamarcalewarts1155 You are ignorant but BBM should have known better.
@wangchung7599 up up yours china owns nothing get out of Philippines Sovereign Area.
@@wangchung7599 China's law is not accepted in international law, because everything China does is fake.
The CCG can also create new laws to override the new PH maritime laws.
Based on law,what kind of laws China followed in WPS? Is it international or their laws that they created and implemented by their own????????.!
What happened to Marcos Sr's PD 1596 issued in 1978? Why file an arbitration case in 2013? Why create another two laws?
The enactment of the other two laws is just an excuse to exaggerate the territory. The Philippines wants to invade the islands and territorial waters of Malaysia, Indonesia, Vietnam and China.
@@junweipan24941596 PD is to steal other country's territory by saying those islands are Terra Nullius, No country is there owner. But Philippines is stupid enought to confess Phillipines have no historical rights based on treaties, maps, legal document to support their claims.
The 2013 is another stuip action. Phillipine take the case to UNCLOS court to judge the sovereignty and Sovereign right that the court have no jurisdiction.
After the rulling, Phillipines send EEZ application to UN but rejected by UN that make Phillipines from a country that have disputed EEZ to a country that have unrecognized EEZ by UN. What a big joke!
After Manila enacted the new laws, China releases baselines of territorial sea adjacent to Huangyan Dao. The CCG vows to strengthen patrols and law enforcement
菲律宾人似乎忘记了怎么与中国人相处？😂菲律宾人不清楚自身，不清楚中国，更不清楚美国！
@@张丽丽-x4b Communist retards are not allowed in this comment section.
这更像是中国开始入侵菲律宾领土。该地区没有华人。
And you don’t know us too
Just one brainwashed by CCP who doenst know the world rulling.. anyway expecting from a communist country .. no freedom
Malaysia, vietnam, Brunei, Indonesia has no water/sea issue with China except Philippine. It seems no body from the 9 Asean members (Malaysia. Singapore, Indonesia, Brunei, Myanmar, Laos. Vietnam, Thailand Cambodia came out to defend the Fhilippino over the South China Sea dispute)?
Actual facts, these 9 Asean members knew the dispute between China and Philippine is the work of the America and they also kbew Philippine is a lackey to US.
Chinese fisherman and survey ships appears and anchored in Luconia Shoals controlled by Malaysia. Vietnamese have dispute with Chinese in Paracel island. Have you forgotten the Johnson South Reef skirmish where 64 Vietnamese soldiers been killed? In Indonesia there is always sighting of Chinese ships in Natuna islands. So don't say that only Philippines have issue with China ofcourse other countries like Myanmar, Laos, Thailand, Cambodia have no problem with China because they are not claimant of these region.
@ryanbruiz3407 Ever since China built the 7 island at South China Sea and drawn the 9 desh line, today there isnt one single of case Filipino pirate robbing of ships in the whole of South China Sea ... Malaysia's Sabah is now a safe tourist destination in Asean ... no more Filipino pirate hijacking .... none, all gone, thank to China costal guards.
@@bah2singtatato116 You are the only one together with your Chinese communist are saying that but the whole world knows the truth that the Chinese are the bully's and the pirate of the high seas and that is the fact.
"China, you have no right to the West Philippine Sea, as the Philippines has been supported by international law. That law is not just for personal interests."
What international law? Does the United Nations support it? Send me the specific terms.
The Philippines is awesome! They directly incorporated our Malaysian territory into the Philippines' jurisdiction. I looked at the Philippines' claims: the islands of Vietnam, China, Malaysia, Indonesia, and Brunei were all incorporated into the Philippines' jurisdiction. Why did the Philippines launch an invasion?
The United States does not abide by international law. Why does it ask China to do so? The Philippines' inclusion of island disputes in the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea is a violation of the Convention. Because the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea will not adjudicate island sovereignty disputes. Because the South China Sea is a disputed area. The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea will not intervene in sovereignty disputes.
@@lvjinbin28 china is far from WPS if you see the map think of it.. chinese eyes are small you have problem..
@junweipan2494 China is for selfish law.. just for fun only😜🇨🇳
🤣🤣🤣🤣你们还有心情关心别人家的事，还不回去应付懂王王者归来！！！
Just one brainless individual who was brainwashed by CCP under communist who doesn’t hve access to external world and international rule base order
WPS IS OUR PHILIPPINE TERRITORY....
Hahaha China your a Liar.
Xi jing ping is GREEDY thats clear
It is like watching Chinese short dramas, just producing for the sake of business no sense at all, full of bully, drugs, s*x and etc. That is how I project _________.
My apologies bloomberg news but your resource person definitely have to be educated when it comes to historical claims. Such an idiotic woman to talk about historical claims.
My apologies bloomberg news but your resource person definitely have to be educated when it comes to historical claims. Such an idiotic woman to talk about historical claims.
My apologies bloomberg news but your resource person definitely have to be educated when it comes to historical claims. Such an idiotic woman to talk about historical claims.
My apologies bloomberg news but your resource person definitely have to be educated when it comes to historical claims. Such an idiotic woman to talk about historical claims.
My apologies bloomberg news but your resource person definitely have to be educated when it comes to historical claims. Such an idiotic woman to talk about historical claims.
My apologies bloomberg news but your resource person definitely have to be educated when it comes to historical claims. Such an idiotic woman to talk about historical claims.
My apologies bloomberg news but your resource person definitely have to be educated when it comes to historical claims. Such an idiotic woman to talk about historical claims.
My apologies bloomberg news but your resource person definitely have to be educated when it comes to historical claims. Such an idiotic woman to talk about historical claims.
My apologies bloomberg news but your resource person definitely have to be educated when it comes to historical claims. Such an idiotic woman to talk about historical claims.
My apologies bloomberg news but your resource person definitely have to be educated when it comes to historical claims. Such an idiotic woman to talk about historical claims.