Why are Apple’s chips faster than Qualcomm’s? - Gary explains

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 6 сен 2024
  • Read the full post: goo.gl/KYdaXp | The benchmark scores for the new Apple A11 Bionic SoC are very impressive. But why is Apple so far ahead of the competition?
    Download the Android Authority App: goo.gl/UQv7kU
    What is cache memory? - Gary explains: • What is cache memory -...
    Subscribe to our RUclips channel: goo.gl/TaqjRc
    ----------------------------------------------------
    Stay connected to Android Authority:
    - www.androidauth...
    - / androidauthority
    - / androidauth
    - / androidauthority
    - / androidauth
    - google.com/+and...
    Follow the Team:
    Josh Vergara: / jvtechtea
    Joe Hindy: / thatjoehindy
    Lanh Nguyen: / lanhnguyenfilms
    Jayce Broda: / jaycebroda
    Gary Sims: / garysims
    Kris Carlon: / kriscarlon
    Nirave Gondhia: / nirave
    David Imel: / durvidimel
    Bailey Stein: / baileystein1

Комментарии • 4,9 тыс.

  • @GarySims
    @GarySims 7 лет назад +2972

    Hi everyone. I hope you liked the video. I will be around for a couple of hours monitoring the comments, so if you have any questions please ask and I will try to help.

    • @NHamza-ew5bc
      @NHamza-ew5bc 7 лет назад +60

      Can you make a video about the Kirin 970 ? And their AI system

    • @saishvengurlekar5601
      @saishvengurlekar5601 7 лет назад +8

      Gary Sims does this apply to exynos or kirin?

    • @GarySims
      @GarySims 7 лет назад +47

      I am sure I will be covering the Kirin 970 at some point, but let's wait for an actual phone to get released that uses it first!

    • @3lloul
      @3lloul 7 лет назад +1

      منور حمبي

    • @GarySims
      @GarySims 7 лет назад +3

      saish vengurlekar basically, yes.

  • @pcsecuritychannel
    @pcsecuritychannel 6 лет назад +2074

    Wow! an honest video covering the facts, no fanboyism one way or the other, just talking tech. Love this!

    • @ariellewest5024
      @ariellewest5024 6 лет назад +42

      It's also talking engineering.

    • @bajszosjozsef4850
      @bajszosjozsef4850 6 лет назад +55

      Yeah, he's unbiased unlike some iFags in the comment section who still talking about bad impressions with 2010 Android phones. Lol.
      That's like spreading a lie that iPhones can't shoot videos because the first 2 or 3 iPhone wasn't able to record video unless you jailbroke them. Which is obviously not true with nowadays iPhones. Just like as the lagging in Android phones. They don't lag more than iPhones. In fact, they sometimes lag less. Yes, 7 or even 4-5 years ago this argument was valid. But not anymore. Bunch of iDiots.

    • @ishadowdevisiras4359
      @ishadowdevisiras4359 6 лет назад +8

      Dude, I love your content!

    • @thomaswayne1852
      @thomaswayne1852 6 лет назад +12

      Agreed. Respect. And I don't even own an android device.

    • @nagalon7255
      @nagalon7255 6 лет назад +32

      Android phones still lag, no Apple fanboy I have a Samsung S7

  • @creato938
    @creato938 7 лет назад +815

    For a channel based on Android that was pretty unbiased, got a sub.

    • @shake4259
      @shake4259 6 лет назад +37

      That's odd, I usually see Apple channels being biased

    • @xbraac
      @xbraac 6 лет назад +41

      Adam Nelson No, that's just android fanboy's just hating to hear straight up facts about Apple and then rendering all of the good information about Apple "biased". I guess most of them can't stand to hear that Apple devices > Android devices

    • @shake4259
      @shake4259 6 лет назад +27

      Boss Brandon tbh most of them are bias on both sides, as an android fan (not fanboy) I have no problem saying that Apple does certain things better than android because I want android to improve in that area.

    • @lazyboygamech
      @lazyboygamech 6 лет назад +2

      I don't really care about bias but I hate that many people bias in a unreasonable way or just want to make fun of opposite fanboy.

    • @stinkleaf
      @stinkleaf 5 лет назад

      Ya are you an android fanboy? How about looking at facts instead. benchmarks don't lie. Like all things there are trade offs. Examine it scientifically.

  • @vietnamball4858
    @vietnamball4858 6 лет назад +514

    That moment when a smartphone has more cores than your pc

    • @wanmaziah9835
      @wanmaziah9835 4 года назад +13

      Lol CPU core on pc has more than smartphone has lol at least up to 8core today smartphone core processor has only get 8core maximum they is no more he can get with it.

    • @mikiswordbreaker4805
      @mikiswordbreaker4805 4 года назад +19

      AMD Ryzen: Hold my 12 cores and 24 threads..

    • @timbervandenhul9383
      @timbervandenhul9383 4 года назад

      @@musemooch yeah true, but to be fair if you were in their position you would do the same.

    • @santriptaswain6578
      @santriptaswain6578 4 года назад +15

      @@wanmaziah9835 Mediatek has been releasing 10 cores SoCs and currently working on 15 to 16 cores...
      But when compared to PC chipsets they aren't that powerful and tbh they aren't comparable as they perform there functions based on purely different environments..

    • @wanmaziah9835
      @wanmaziah9835 4 года назад +8

      @@santriptaswain6578 even when compare to Snapdragon is not even closer why you compare to pc processor ? Lol more core it doesn't you get better performance learn from apple chip dude imao

  • @nomebear
    @nomebear 5 лет назад +78

    Two years and you were right on the mark with your projections. Today, Apple is moving away from Intel CPUs as well.

  • @NHamza-ew5bc
    @NHamza-ew5bc 7 лет назад +521

    Another quality video from Gary , thanks for the solid content

    • @GarySims
      @GarySims 7 лет назад +26

      Glad you liked it! :-)

    • @yustinj.6792
      @yustinj.6792 6 лет назад

      Smug Chad Ur welcum

  • @mildj84bg
    @mildj84bg 6 лет назад +362

    I think that in a near future we might see MacBooks using Apple's CPUs.
    A11 Bionic already beats some of the Intel's chips that are in current gen MacBooks.

    • @appleexposed4404
      @appleexposed4404 5 лет назад +33

      A12X beats Xbox One S a year later.

    • @Sandia49
      @Sandia49 5 лет назад +31

      Apple Exposed The A11 (and maybe A10) were more powerful than the Xbox One CPU as well. The A12X was impressive because it had faster GPU performance than an Xbox One. So that pretty much also means the iPad has greater graphics performance than a 13in macbook pro. It’s pretty wild.

    • @nolategame6367
      @nolategame6367 4 года назад +24

      @@Sandia49 The CPU in a console isn't actually supposed to be powerful y'know? The Xbox absolutely positively smashes apple in the graphical department because it has a gigantic integrated GPU. Apple might have a powerful CPU side but no phone can actually beat the consoles in graphics.

    • @Sandia49
      @Sandia49 4 года назад

      No LateGame Well no phone can beat the xbox, but the A12X in the iPad pro matches the floating point performance of an xbox. Of course there’s other factors that effect it, but it’s really cool to see. Also, I’d disagree about the console CPUs because there’s actually plenty of games on the market right now that get bottlenecked by the weak CPU. It makes it hard to run AI and Physics effectively without the extra CPU power

    • @yogapratama5225
      @yogapratama5225 4 года назад

      The Apple ecosytem would be more immersive if those things happened

  • @GamingLife076
    @GamingLife076 6 лет назад +139

    When i said my Iphone 5s slowed down with time passing, i was crazy.
    When i said my Ipad mini 2 slowed down after a while , i was crazy.
    When Apple said they lowered their clockspeeds to maintain batterylife , they were praised.
    And i'm still crazy.

    • @busimo
      @busimo 6 лет назад +13

      GamingFreak076 never saw any praise for lowering the clocks speed.

    • @5dwolf22
      @5dwolf22 6 лет назад +15

      They lowered it to keep batteries alive but also tweaked things in ios to keep the phone running strong.
      But since iphone x they went all out with the power so when they do reduce the speed its not going to effect the speed as much.

    • @circuit10
      @circuit10 4 года назад

      @@busimo They didn't underclock the 5s though...
      It would have gotten slower with updates

    • @busimo
      @busimo 4 года назад

      @@circuit10 apple should've given choice in this case

    • @circuit10
      @circuit10 4 года назад

      @@busimo ?

  • @dylon4906
    @dylon4906 7 лет назад +465

    I like this guy. He's very level headed about android and ios in a world where android users and ios users are in constant war over nit picking and misconceptions.

    • @GarySims
      @GarySims 7 лет назад +29

      I try my best.

    • @secfol5272
      @secfol5272 7 лет назад +1

      Misconception? Well you nailed it..

    • @DigitalMonsters
      @DigitalMonsters 6 лет назад +13

      Yeah I'm android and have an unjustified negative bias against iOS, this was a welcome slap in the face.

    • @clariecec9101
      @clariecec9101 6 лет назад +2

      Apple VS. the knockoffs.

    • @wojak6793
      @wojak6793 6 лет назад +5

      Izumi Koushiro yeah, especially when I even heard a android user tell me his s4 is better than my iPhone X

  • @mayurbhoi
    @mayurbhoi 7 лет назад +158

    Excellent video explaining the concepts unlike everyone saying Apple chips are "optimized" Gary's videos are always worth it

    • @MarksTech
      @MarksTech 7 лет назад +12

      well this 15 minute video can be summarized by one word; optimized..
      Qualcomm has to worry about ALL the android phones that use their processor.. meanwhile, apple only has to worry about one phone... iPhone.
      thats optimization.

    • @mumblic
      @mumblic 7 лет назад +11

      Good cooperation between software and hardware department can make the OS run smoother and give for example a better battery life. But has zero impact on 3th party benchmarks. That's why this explanation of "optimization" falls apart. If a CPU performs good on a raw benchmark test then all credits goes to the SOC designers. So credit towards those guys. When the OS runs smoother (even on a slower cpu) then this is because of "optimization" between different departments. But you can' t know because there is only one OS running on Apple's soc's.

    • @mayurbhoi
      @mayurbhoi 7 лет назад +3

      Mum Blic +1 Neither the chips nor the software alone is optimised, it's the coordination between both. The point I was trying to make was that everyone keeps saying that iOS is "optimised" to run on those Ax series chips which is not completely true. Gary has a video on that topic too.

    • @TheSteveSteele
      @TheSteveSteele 7 лет назад +2

      This topic goes all the way back to the 1980s when the Mac was released on a Motorola 68000 CPU. The “OS and CPU are closely tied” vs the Microsoft approach of licensing the OS debate. Jobs famous quote is, “We make the whole widget.” Yeah, at that time Motorola was making the CPU. But, Apple had a big say in the 68000 series and later the PPC, which I was a part of. I worked in Motorola’s PPC Management and Planning division. I got to see 5 year plans and one of the fabs was in same building. It was an incredible experience although Motorola’s leadership was so fragmented that it begin their quick and disastrous downfall. That’s a different story for a different time.

    • @johna7287
      @johna7287 6 лет назад

      And benchmarks are equivalent to real time use how? They aren't...

  • @gofeninfinity4174
    @gofeninfinity4174 7 лет назад +35

    I really like his presentation

  • @SupremeRulahXemu
    @SupremeRulahXemu 6 лет назад +2

    Kinda late to this but i just wanted to say how refreshing it is to listen to you, Gary. One of the most technical, most comprehensive hosts on youtube.
    Everyone else puts their money into intro music, graphics and fancy studios and have a sliver of a fraction of the content you have.
    Thank you for staying technical. I always learn things watching your videos.

  • @cocsugardaddy4377
    @cocsugardaddy4377 7 лет назад +26

    You explain things very well. I have no idea about chips and things but I actually fully understand everything what you said! Keep up the good work!

  • @Silvia0073
    @Silvia0073 7 лет назад +322

    Not a big fan of apple for various reasons but that a11 chip certainly is a beast.

    • @zohaibbhatti7818
      @zohaibbhatti7818 6 лет назад +67

      potato, not its not, you are stupid

    • @trashcant4678
      @trashcant4678 6 лет назад +7

      potato potato potato potato potato potato potato its not lol,

    • @zsurvivalist7996
      @zsurvivalist7996 6 лет назад +6

      potato potato potato potato potato potato potato it is , but it's also saying that's there's too many issues to make their great stuff worth it.

    • @arvark4105
      @arvark4105 6 лет назад +2

      Sam
      Not really. CPU clock speed amd core count don't really mean anything.

    • @xpusostomos
      @xpusostomos 6 лет назад +22

      Arvark : a11 isn't fast because of clock speed, it's fast because it's fast.

  • @IEA_455
    @IEA_455 7 лет назад +82

    Finally someone who explains something with knowledge instead of rabble babble lies cause they hate apple !

    • @khalilrazak6486
      @khalilrazak6486 6 лет назад +9

      Oh dear, a butt hurt Apple fan.

    • @sextionmirror
      @sextionmirror 5 лет назад +1

      Khalil Razak Why you call him like that ?
      Whats wrong ?

  • @OSpartan1170
    @OSpartan1170 6 лет назад +280

    You could save a lot of time answering with just one word:
    Optimization.

    • @mtk3587
      @mtk3587 5 лет назад +13

      @Chris C Exactly what Im telling everyone

    • @sukoii616
      @sukoii616 5 лет назад +17

      But you still can't move apps where you want it to be xD

    • @Oystein87
      @Oystein87 5 лет назад +7

      Gary have made a video explaining you that both are optimized so thats just a bullshit myth.. And in real life use I always find that the Apple chip is not any faster than the competition. That makes me doubt benchmarks even more than before.

    • @ILoveGrilledCheese
      @ILoveGrilledCheese 5 лет назад +13

      Apple chips are faster because of their “race to sleep” priority. They use larger single cores to open and close apps and put them to sleep as fast as possible. Snapdragons use more smaller cores to handle android’s background multitasking.

    • @ILoveGrilledCheese
      @ILoveGrilledCheese 5 лет назад +6

      @Uchiha Madara yeah, the soc is designed to literally get the task done as fast as possible so it can go into a sleep state for idle power efficiency. That's why Apple focuses on single core over multi. It's not meant to run many tasks at once.

  • @TheSVT03Cobra
    @TheSVT03Cobra 7 лет назад +6

    Gary is probably the smartest Android person I know. I bet AA is glad to have him. Keep up the work my friend!

  • @808thampire
    @808thampire 7 лет назад +345

    You forgot to mention another important fact: Qualcom's patents are stipling competition in the U.S. That's why Google for example cannot hire a processer team to make their own processors and why Samsung's Exynos is not allowed in the U.S.

    • @808thampire
      @808thampire 7 лет назад +55

      mpserrano1 they probably paid the Qualcomm patent tax like Apple does.

    • @tanveerhasan2382
      @tanveerhasan2382 7 лет назад +2

      You know, i was just thinking that why google didn't design a custom SOC for their products

    • @sweetcheels
      @sweetcheels 7 лет назад +46

      Hence why Apple is in a legal battle with Qualcomm rights now

    • @xtreamer3070
      @xtreamer3070 7 лет назад +2

      Ibliss and Samsung is not allowed to sell their processor to other companies,why is that

    • @zagan1
      @zagan1 7 лет назад +5

      Exynos is sold in the usa.
      Samsung just keep it mainly for the south korean and Japan markets.
      Qualcomm can also make more chips and do it faster than samsung

  • @StevenSteel7
    @StevenSteel7 7 лет назад +183

    My God .. I learned sooo much today... thanks for this entertainingly informative video!👍

    • @GarySims
      @GarySims 7 лет назад +6

      Good to hear that you liked it! :-)

    • @lokman02naza17
      @lokman02naza17 7 лет назад

      Same man, but Gary Sims forgot to mention one things about apple able to make their cpu have wider pipeline & run at lower clock speed like in android authority article.

    • @mothutheslow3955
      @mothutheslow3955 7 лет назад +1

      Gary already said that, on one of his earlier videos.

    • @lokman02naza17
      @lokman02naza17 7 лет назад

      Infinite Buffer can you give me the link to that videos

    • @mothutheslow3955
      @mothutheslow3955 7 лет назад +1

      Here you are:
      ruclips.net/video/gLsdS0zQ82c/видео.html
      And I think he mentioned something in this video too but mainly the top one:
      ruclips.net/video/D9prht-PcWY/видео.html

  • @canwegetsubswithfewvideos
    @canwegetsubswithfewvideos 6 лет назад +161

    Just WOW no bias. Love this guy!
    Plus i have that A11 bionic processor on my iphone x.. playin PUBGM smoothly with HDR is just amazing

    • @concordsst
      @concordsst 5 лет назад +18

      Not real HDR my guy, the only real display panels that can take true advantage of HDR are TV sized

    • @rohanmiscrits
      @rohanmiscrits 5 лет назад +26

      iPhones are actually best for gaming. If you want the best PUBGM experience get an iPad

    • @shoaibaalam8978
      @shoaibaalam8978 5 лет назад +3

      Plz donate your iphone to me..you buy new phone . 😭😭😭

    • @kaz9242
      @kaz9242 5 лет назад +10

      And you can also play that in poco f1 which is 4 times cheaper or any android with snapdragon 845.

    • @rj7250a
      @rj7250a 5 лет назад +4

      Kazi Ovi poco f1 are a midrange phone with flagship Soc

  • @parkseunghee9390
    @parkseunghee9390 7 лет назад +12

    This man takes the word "authority" literally

  • @AreaofInterestTV
    @AreaofInterestTV 7 лет назад +5

    Thank you sir.. Finally got ans to my question.. Superb Video 👌👌

  • @mohamedbasha5281
    @mohamedbasha5281 7 лет назад +305

    I need a comparison with the Kirin 970

    • @GarySims
      @GarySims 7 лет назад +64

      Well that is a little hard since there aren't any devices out yet with the Kirin 970!

    • @mohamedbasha5281
      @mohamedbasha5281 7 лет назад +26

      Yes I know
      I hope you do it after you use the mate 10 from Huawei
      With Snapdragon 835 and A11

    • @GrimYak
      @GrimYak 7 лет назад +5

      Mohamed Basha surprisingly the Kirins are a okay. My P9 never stutters and has strong battery life

    • @mohamedbasha5281
      @mohamedbasha5281 7 лет назад +1

      Yes that's right so I brefere Huawei device specifically the p series in the android os @jay G

    • @mohamedbasha5281
      @mohamedbasha5281 7 лет назад +7

      Actually the Kirin 960 is more powerful than Snapdragon 821 and it competing Snapdragon 835 so if U use for example Huawei p10 and s8 U will find that the p10 more faster the only thing that the Snapdragon 835 beats Kirin 960 the GPU and not that the big difference

  • @KyudoKun
    @KyudoKun 6 лет назад +2

    One good factor that I also want to add in this is that, Apple iPhone is a closed platform device. Meaning that all the apps are very optimized for it, especially they have proprietary software or tools for the devs to create like the Metal API. Being a closed platform has many advantages, and right now Apple has already developed their own in-house GPU, I expect that the coming years for Smartphone competition will get more exciting.

  • @MarsorryIckuatuna
    @MarsorryIckuatuna 7 лет назад +227

    Pretty cool! Learnt a heck of a lot right there...

  • @OhhYasssh
    @OhhYasssh 7 лет назад +558

    WOWWWWWW.... Such a Great Explanation ....... just sweeeeet man ... Love You Video

    • @SmartphoneWars
      @SmartphoneWars 6 лет назад +9

      The explanation was super-vague and not even remotely true on the why ANDROID is behind part.

    • @man2596
      @man2596 6 лет назад

      Agreed...since the market share owned by Android phone makers is bigger than Apple's.

    • @dimuthukarunathilaka3928
      @dimuthukarunathilaka3928 6 лет назад

      oh yeah! compared to tons of You tube videos made by Techies (called only by themselves) in India. You know some guys talks like parrots & hard to even catch up their English... LOL!

    • @Man_With_Brain.
      @Man_With_Brain. 6 лет назад

      YASH RAJ SHARMA अपने भाई लोग उनके चैनल पर कॉपी कर रहे हैं इस वीडियो को।😂😂😂😂😂 how shit is this thing...

    • @tjzulu1
      @tjzulu1 6 лет назад

      Hey Smartphone Wars....However you fail to produce any thing based on "actual" fact to back up what you say, unlike the engineer in the video who actually knows what he's talking about...so your argument (if that's what you want to call it) means NOTHING!!!

  • @nicoxis
    @nicoxis 7 лет назад +47

    I wonder if Samsung will eventually adopt Apple's strategy and go all in on it's chip design rather than keeping up with Qualcomm (Huawei seems to be doing so)

    • @Manny911GT
      @Manny911GT 7 лет назад +11

      Too bad they can't sell in the us (exynox) cause of the different modems used in the us

    • @0x1EGEN
      @0x1EGEN 7 лет назад +5

      Nicoxis...Samsung originally did the same as Apple, before the Apple even did it. Samsung used to use their own designed and manufactured processors for their devices back then. The first Galaxy phones used a Samsung made CPU.

    • @andrewpranoto
      @andrewpranoto 7 лет назад

      Can't samsung has deal with Snapdragon.

    • @EdwardHunterMX
      @EdwardHunterMX 7 лет назад +3

      nicoxis Actually they were the first manufacture of chips for the iPhone , from the iPhone 2G to the 3GS , hahaha

    • @Alm8hoorOW
      @Alm8hoorOW 7 лет назад

      nicoxis They’d have to have a semi-custom version of Android. I doubt Google would give them a free edge to competition.

  • @wimwiddershins
    @wimwiddershins 6 лет назад +318

    Apple = bottom up optimization. Everyone else is working with off the shelf stuff.

    • @appleexposed4404
      @appleexposed4404 5 лет назад +22

      @
      Android devices are overpriced considering Apple pays for everything they invent.

    • @ItsDevv
      @ItsDevv 5 лет назад +17

      @@appleexposed4404 um...you think Androids are overpriced because of a few things?

    • @appleexposed4404
      @appleexposed4404 5 лет назад +10

      @@ItsDevv
      No they're super overpriced. None should be over 200 bucks.

    • @appleexposed4404
      @appleexposed4404 5 лет назад +19

      @@muhdaimanharith
      WRONG.
      There's nothing innovative about a giant iPhone. Remember when Apple haters claimed iPad would fail because it was just a giant iPhone? Then all androids copied as usual.
      Apple collaborated with Google to create Google Apps. It's not like they were invented by "android" lol.
      "owh, how many apple user that use at least 90% of the soc power?.. none "
      Everyone because it's always in use from FaceID, Apps, Speed to AR.
      " Because apple limits it to save the battery from dying.. that's why android battery can last longer because while ios give full speed.. none of them realize that our battery aren't powerful enough... "
      Ridiculous. Shows you don't understand technology.
      "while arm making sure that their chip doesn't degrade the battery faster than their old chip.."
      More uninformed chatter.
      If it wasn't for Apple you wouldn't have android, apps, visual voicemail, multi-touch, touch gestures stolen from Apple, tablets, digital stores, streaming, icon based software, fonts, mobile internet, wifi, USB, etc. etc.

    • @ItsDevv
      @ItsDevv 5 лет назад +3

      @@muhdaimanharith preach

  • @tipoomaster
    @tipoomaster 7 лет назад +4

    Machine complexity goes up exponentially with width, which is why both Intel and Apple stopped at about a 6-wide machine, while the rest of mobile fare is still 4-wide. To get the extra steps would be a near doubling in core size for everyone else, and much more complicated and costly R&D. Could they do it, maybe, but as the video mentions Apple has the advantage of knowing each chip will be sold with a high margin phone wrapped around it, while Qualcomm is selling to a lot of phone makers that are on razor margins. Samsung had the best shot with their margins and Exynos but now that just seems about as good as Snapdragon despite an early lead.

  • @crisdannm.6601
    @crisdannm.6601 7 лет назад +343

    Now i know. Very well explain sir.

    • @robbdogg861
      @robbdogg861 7 лет назад +1

      Cris Dann M. A comment on what was said in the video. Thank you sir

    • @Frozoken
      @Frozoken 6 лет назад

      Cris Dann M. They aren't this year

  • @nefarious7721
    @nefarious7721 7 лет назад +6

    Nice explainations mate thanks

  • @EclipticVistaYT
    @EclipticVistaYT 6 лет назад +112

    When Mr Gary sims explains you listen to it attentively

  • @LuneTech
    @LuneTech 7 лет назад +272

    I know you say Apple had a head start, but even in 2 years I feel like Qualcomm still won't match the single core performance of even the A10 from last year.

    • @chosenbydestiny
      @chosenbydestiny 7 лет назад +16

      One of the few people in here actually basing your comment on actual facts, good job bro. Android phones can't harness that raw power they're pretty much ahead in every other aspect though. Android OS could use a few more generations of tweaks under the hood too.

    • @OneMomentPls
      @OneMomentPls 7 лет назад +22

      LuneTech yup, that's as Gary say, because Qualcomm can't risk to develop a big size soc with L3 5mb+ cache and stuff, since they need to sell them to android phone maker and need profit, so the risk it won't sell is high (just remember the ultrasonic fp from qualcom and the new display technology from qualcom, it all been forgotten)

    • @Adit-nn9of
      @Adit-nn9of 7 лет назад +1

      True ☹

    • @AnimeBeefRandoms
      @AnimeBeefRandoms 7 лет назад +28

      Android is optimized to run lots of hardware so it can run well with even lower end chips. Android paired with a higher end chip runs even better. If Android was running on an A11 it would smash a iOS phone anyday.

    • @OneMomentPls
      @OneMomentPls 7 лет назад +13

      AnimeBeefRandoms and sadly that's won't happen, i hope it can though, recently got to run android on a pc (entry spec i3) and the benchmarking is mindblown

  • @norseko
    @norseko 7 лет назад +4

    Enjoyed the info in this video, very good.

  • @vegetable_3798
    @vegetable_3798 6 лет назад +11

    I really appreciated how objective this video was. 👍

  • @omkarvenkata
    @omkarvenkata 6 лет назад +13

    The best video i saw in the field of smartphone technology.

  • @timothybaxter9993
    @timothybaxter9993 7 лет назад +74

    Thank you for explaining this Gary.

  • @utubedano
    @utubedano 7 лет назад +39

    Gary you should have your own channel... The most sensible & knowledgeable video I've seen in a while in this mobile space.
    Great work!

  • @fdoffuzzydreams
    @fdoffuzzydreams 7 лет назад +6

    Amazing explanation of distinguishing features between Apple A11 bionic and Snapdragon 835.. quite insightful and interesting... I love your videos.. keep making more of these.. Thanks

  • @danish__official5374
    @danish__official5374 3 года назад +1

    Nicely explained the major differences between Apple Processor vs Android Processor architecture.

  • @markj5820
    @markj5820 7 лет назад +8

    100% quality content
    this is why I like this guy

  • @dgangwar
    @dgangwar 7 лет назад +76

    Hi Gary, according to your explanation Samsung can do same with their exynos series but they are not doing it. Any specific reason apart from that they are behind in developing?

    • @GarySims
      @GarySims 7 лет назад +53

      Samsung could do the same, Qualcomm could do the same, MediaTek could do the same. But there is a big gap between theory and practice.

    • @dgangwar
      @dgangwar 7 лет назад +10

      I meant that Samsung also manufactures processor in-house so they can increase processor cost and cut down some other cost for better performance but I think they are far behind from apple in processor design right now. Thanks for your reply :)

    • @GarySims
      @GarySims 7 лет назад +21

      Yes, Samsung could do that, but don't as most of its devices don't use Exynos processors.

    • @blinblinthing
      @blinblinthing 7 лет назад +11

      I believe there are patents that prevent Samsung from selling Notes and Ss in the US.

    • @iceguy9445
      @iceguy9445 7 лет назад +4

      Maybe it's about Money because Samsung is sill smaller than Apple!

  • @rafaelnistor1652
    @rafaelnistor1652 5 лет назад +3

    Do you think they will put a 16 MB L2 Cache in the A13? ( they already did on the A12X btw )

  • @KyudoKun
    @KyudoKun 6 лет назад +1

    One good factor that I also want to add in this is that, Apple iPhone is a closed platform device. Meaning that all the apps are very optimized for it, especially they have proprietary software or tools for the devs like the Metal API. Being a closed platform has many advantages, and right now Apple has already developed their own in-house GPU. Expect that in the coming years Smartphone competition will get more exciting.

  • @vernearase3044
    @vernearase3044 5 лет назад +16

    I think you're pretty much putting the horse before the cart.
    Sure Apple plays with caches, but Qualcomm and others are pretty much just using stock ARM cores and playing with core counts and caches, whereas Apple has rearchitected their processors to go wide, with out of order execution units and optimizations which (despite their power envelope) are challenging the speed of Intel's server CPUs.
    To put it in biological terms, they're not just performing organ transplants; they're designing (within ARM instruction constraints) their own DNA.
    And yes, Apple chip designers do have only one customer, but their customer is probably one of the largest consumer of silicon in the world, and their custom silicon is the biggest key to their performance edge - well, that and the fact that they have some of the best software engineers, and iPhone software runs down on the metal without the need to go through an interpreter or code transcoder.
    (It's also why memory use is less; iPhone code is native ARM binaries, not Dalvik or Open Java tokens).

    • @loop5720
      @loop5720 4 года назад +1

      Well said my dude, but I'm still excited for the new Snapdragon 865. ;D

  • @eugeneshasherin880
    @eugeneshasherin880 6 лет назад +6

    It's a very thorough explanation. Thank you.

  • @rueben1001
    @rueben1001 6 лет назад +12

    i love how he had to add "no wars in the comments" xD

  • @misusatriyo
    @misusatriyo 6 лет назад +1

    great explanation. but how about exynos?

  • @naufalalyakbar4033
    @naufalalyakbar4033 7 лет назад +5

    Nice Video man!!

  • @Lokuzdeckel
    @Lokuzdeckel 7 лет назад +106

    The problem is Qualcomm does not feel pressure from Apple because they have a monopoly at their buisness with Android :(

    • @kajaning
      @kajaning 6 лет назад +1

      Yes android more cheap than Apple price thats fact in my region asia

    • @ropl-rehabresort4924
      @ropl-rehabresort4924 6 лет назад +10

      jay kajaning - He didn't talk about the pricing? xD

    • @kajaning
      @kajaning 6 лет назад

      Robin it's fact when price talk everybody knows Android more cheaper than apple product. Cause in my country price it's important

    • @pedrohenriquerodrigues4597
      @pedrohenriquerodrigues4597 6 лет назад +3

      I think that too! Maybe if other companies, like Samsung, start manufacturing their own processors, Qualcomm will begin to work harder

    • @t0x1cd
      @t0x1cd 6 лет назад +11

      Pedro Henrique Rodrigues you do realise samsung produces their own processors for the galaxy series right...? The s8/s8+ have variants using either the snapdragon 835 or exynos 8895 which is slightly faster but both are really close.

  • @BigMacIIx
    @BigMacIIx 6 лет назад +3

    Very good resumé, even more fascinating would be follow the history of the relationship between ARM and Apple... Apple is one of the original investor of ARM and they were using ARM chips in the 90s in their Newton product and iPod later on.

    • @Archimedes75009
      @Archimedes75009 5 лет назад

      Apple a évité la faillite en revendant toutes ses actions ARM ... Dommage pour eux vue la valeur payée par Softbank ...

  • @alexandrubossro
    @alexandrubossro 5 лет назад +11

    on android channels talks about apple cool things
    on apple channels mocking android

  • @seanc.5310
    @seanc.5310 6 лет назад +4

    Gary, Great job on this one, truly! Thanks for such a candid and unbiased explaination, I really learned a lot about the design and development of these chips.

  • @Hitesh001100
    @Hitesh001100 7 лет назад +25

    Well explained, Garry. Really good to learn new stuff!

  • @MrSergeng
    @MrSergeng 6 лет назад +3

    Amazing explanation that is objective and straight to the point. This video is so good that it made me subscribe to Android Authority as a full-Apple user!

  • @sparksco1980
    @sparksco1980 6 лет назад +1

    Hi Gary. Can you a comparison between HiSilicon Kirin chips by Huawei, Qualcomm and Apple.

  • @O_u_M_u_a_M_u_a.
    @O_u_M_u_a_M_u_a. 5 лет назад +4

    You do a lot of hard work and a lot of information sharing..You deserve a like

  • @Avigazed
    @Avigazed 4 года назад +3

    Thanks.
    Question: What aspect of the devices' performance benefits from a high multiscore?

    • @nolategame6367
      @nolategame6367 4 года назад

      Multitasking and multicore applications. Usually those are productivity apps. Games tend to only use 2 or 4 cores.

    • @Avigazed
      @Avigazed 4 года назад

      @@nolategame6367 Thanks,
      Please forgive any ignorance shown but, isn't 2 or 4 cores "multicore"?
      And, what then is an example of a single core application?

    • @nolategame6367
      @nolategame6367 4 года назад

      @@Avigazed well, sorry, usually applications needing more than 4 cores are called multicore for reasons. It's nothing to be ashamed about. And a singlecore application is an application that runs on a single thread, they're pretty rare, since everyone nowadays has at least 2 cores and software is developped to take advantage of those without overloading people's systems.(Also increases software complexity, but that's mostly unrelated)

  • @jettangeles2707
    @jettangeles2707 6 лет назад +5

    Optimization is key 🔑.

  • @OMARiOmarDroid
    @OMARiOmarDroid 6 лет назад +1

    What a awesome educational video! Thanks Gary!

  • @masterphoenixpraha
    @masterphoenixpraha 7 лет назад +51

    i really like this video. in this world, where fans of one platform can be really mean to fans of the other platforms (both ways of course), seeing such an fair and acknowledging comment is a big plus... i'm on the Apple side, but still like many things what happen on the Android side.

  • @ILoveGrilledCheese
    @ILoveGrilledCheese 5 лет назад +23

    My biggest issue with the way android handles their SOCs is that you can buy an older iPhone such as a 6s plus for sub $200 and get a great performing phone, but on the Android side you have to pay $500+ to find an SOC with similar performance. So in terms of future proofing Android phones cost way more than Apple.

    • @cadetic
      @cadetic 4 года назад +9

      "android phones cost *_way_* more than apple." *_cough cough_* $1000 monitor stand *_cough cough_*

    • @maulanasatyaadigama3408
      @maulanasatyaadigama3408 4 года назад +1

      majest!cloudz he said phone, a better example would be iphone X against s8 plus

    • @cadetic
      @cadetic 4 года назад

      @@maulanasatyaadigama3408 oh so you need more understanding? so you gotta know that apple's "cheap" iphone (talkin about xr) costs ~$720. but there is one phone that costs ±$350 and has 8gb ram, 128 gb rom, triple camera setup, snapdragon 855. sO doES anDROiD pHoneS cOst mORre thAn aPppplE?

    • @cadetic
      @cadetic 4 года назад

      @@maulanasatyaadigama3408 oh so you need more understanding? so you gotta know that apple's "cheap" iphone (talkin about xr) costs ~$720. but there is one phone that costs ±$350 and has 8gb ram, 128 gb rom, triple camera setup, snapdragon 855. sO doES anDROiD pHoneS cOst mORre thAn aPppplE?

    • @maulanasatyaadigama3408
      @maulanasatyaadigama3408 4 года назад +1

      majest!cloudz i just say that he was talking about phones, not overall product. But both is true, apple product is more expensive than android products, the $1000 apple pro stand is a product but not a phone. I remind that he was talking about phone, so if you want to do the cough cough then use a phone example like iphone X against s8 plus or iphone XS against samsung s9.

  • @SuckerforMetal
    @SuckerforMetal 7 лет назад +5

    Wow you're amazing thank you

  • @tausifwahdi
    @tausifwahdi 6 лет назад +2

    Great video. Apple's chips are way fast. Android phone companies competing neck to neck with iphones with those chips is really a remarkable achievement in their own.

  • @hi-fidude6670
    @hi-fidude6670 7 лет назад +23

    I'm a Samsung user but will the Exynos ever catch up to Apple CPUs?

    • @hi-fidude6670
      @hi-fidude6670 7 лет назад +7

      What? No Exynos has 10000 performance point

    • @felixschumann9880
      @felixschumann9880 7 лет назад +11

      CaddyPro'59 they could easliy catch up but as he said with higher cost it takes to produce the cpus it would be very unlikely they would as Samsung spends their budget elsewhere, for example on the screen

    • @powerofpinesol8002
      @powerofpinesol8002 7 лет назад +2

      CaddyPro'59 of course not nobody is paying a $1000 dollars for an android phone that why the S8 is on heavy discounts now.. if they were to follow apple their phones will be over a thousand dollars which is exactly like the iPhone 10 the thing is apple can charge that ludicrous price but Samsung can’t all the tech Samsung’s puts in its phones they couldn’t get away with having a processor as powerful

    • @AnimeBeefRandoms
      @AnimeBeefRandoms 7 лет назад +12

      Samsung needs to work on its software performance more than it's hardware.

    • @leandsz693
      @leandsz693 7 лет назад

      AnimeBeefRandoms n its already doin it
      Check the speed tests

  • @lukamih
    @lukamih 7 лет назад +16

    Good day. Please do a similar video about Hisilicon Kirin. Huawei does a similar in house process that Apple does with Kirin. The Kirin has a good bench mark score but the real world usage is way better then even I phones. Please help and explain everything to us in a video about Kirin and Hauwei... Thanks! P.S love your vids!

  • @alwaysdrunk5461
    @alwaysdrunk5461 6 лет назад +572

    android users: "look at this RAM and all those high numbers Android phones have. Apple is so behind"
    android users when iPhones have higher raw geek bench scores: "Numbers don't matter, because usEr eXPeriEnCe"

    • @arvark4105
      @arvark4105 6 лет назад +36

      Alex Kim
      Clock speed doesn't really mean anything.

    • @JeancarlosGamesLegion
      @JeancarlosGamesLegion 6 лет назад +38

      Cool but compares right, A11 vs 845, A10 vs 835

    • @HamzaElgarrab
      @HamzaElgarrab 6 лет назад +18

      .. :/ again those apple, android users comments insulting each other..

    • @kostaspettos947
      @kostaspettos947 6 лет назад +14

      I will say only that Huawei is the first company with 7 nm chips hisilicon kirin 980 btw the smartphone with the highest benchmarks right now is the mate 20 that will be released in 2 months 🙃

    • @KiloWattRC
      @KiloWattRC 6 лет назад +19

      Android pays my Bill's, I pad's keep my kids busy.

  • @RazgovorIsDialog
    @RazgovorIsDialog 6 лет назад

    Gary that gesture you do at the beginning of a video before you start explaining is just pure gold!!! Keep up the great work!!!

  • @pvaz
    @pvaz 6 лет назад +8

    Refreshing, unbiased and informative. This reminds more of my lessons in uni then the usual fanboys in RUclips. Subbed

  • @bogartsandiego604
    @bogartsandiego604 5 лет назад +7

    i will hire this guy to work on my mobile phone repair shop

  • @jeffsampayan
    @jeffsampayan 6 лет назад +11

    Nice vid, the story/facts seems very reminiscent of Intel vs AMD, at least up until Ryzen. Maybe Qualcomm will have their Ryzen moment in the future. Long story short, on-paper specs are only one element of performance.

  • @kumarsiva1316
    @kumarsiva1316 6 лет назад +1

    Explained the whole stuff in the best possible way. Excellent video... I wish we had lecturers of this enthusiasm in college.

  • @michel-manuel
    @michel-manuel 5 лет назад +6

    So why is Samsung Exynos chip now slower than Qualcomm. Mmmm

  • @kyleperez5241
    @kyleperez5241 7 лет назад +45

    What if Apple was called banana!??....

  • @roningaijin7701
    @roningaijin7701 7 лет назад +7

    All of this amounts to a hill of beans. As OnePlus already figured out you can close that gap or even exceed it by adding more RAM. Even without that the difference is hardly noticeable except on benchmarks which are becoming a thing of the past.

  • @the-real-zpero
    @the-real-zpero 4 года назад +1

    Making a processor, a phone, and an OS all in-house is a bigger advantage than people realize.
    If you look at Formula 1, traditionally the teams that make their own chassis and also their own engine do better than teams that make a chassis and buy another team's engine, because making the chassis and the engine allows them to squeeze the engine into the tail of the car better, allowing them to plan aerodynamics of the car with more time and insight. Of course some engine customer teams do very well too, it's not a rule that's written in stone. But i suspect it's a similar situation here.

  • @calebds28
    @calebds28 6 лет назад +5

    Love the breakdown that really taught me a lot without it being a headache LOL

  • @malcolmh5736
    @malcolmh5736 5 лет назад +6

    thanks for the vid. refreshing to see a guy with an Android shirt on giving scientific report without bias. nice.

  • @tanimxubayer1600
    @tanimxubayer1600 7 лет назад +8

    Excellent!

  • @AdityaChatterjee673
    @AdityaChatterjee673 6 лет назад +1

    I am using iPad Pro 10.5 with a10x fusion chip which has 8mb L2 cache and no L3 cache ,is my processor is too Power full ??

  • @craftyness5454
    @craftyness5454 7 лет назад +22

    So that's why Exynos CPUs are faster than the Snapdragon counterparts...
    Dammit.

    • @cheezybread7783
      @cheezybread7783 5 лет назад +4

      @FRODO SWAGGINS that depends, like the Exynos destroys the multi-tasking performance and app launch vs snapdragon with regards Galaxy S7. But snapdragon has abetter graphics chip.

    • @wanmaziah9835
      @wanmaziah9835 5 лет назад

      @ಠ_ ಠ lol.... Pls compare to sd 855 that things will crush surely..... Exynos 9820 and better..... GPU part..... Exynos faster CPU because they are full modified their are CPU core lol like we get on exynos 9810..... Mongoose 3... And now mongoose 4 on 9820 but clock still 2.7Ghz.... than the SD 855 2.84Ghz kryo 485....

    • @wanmaziah9835
      @wanmaziah9835 5 лет назад

      Snapdragon is still better pls learn more about soc....

    • @cheezybread7783
      @cheezybread7783 5 лет назад +1

      Bad news the WiFi Alliance certification removed the chance for the S7 to get android pie. So therefore, Samsung just rejected the S7 support here onwards only security updates no software

    • @yab3146
      @yab3146 5 лет назад +2

      @ಠ_ ಠ why would you compare the 9820 to a 845? The 855 exists and it's outperforms the exynos in every way. Score doesn't matter

  • @NizarElZarif
    @NizarElZarif 7 лет назад +34

    apples is investing heavily in their own CPU and GPU design. I think it would be possible in the future for Apple to release a MacBook with their own ARM CPU. not the Macbook pro, I think these would still be using Intel CPUs for long time, just the Macbook. Modern CPUs are becoming very efficient in their emulation of other ISA
    Also there was a video from computerphile channel were they had an arm GPU desginer taking about mobile SoC design, geberally speaking, in the high end market, silicon real-estate is not a deciding factor, power and enegy efficiency is. however in the midrange and lower end SoC for smartphones, area is the most important part.

    • @k0zzu21
      @k0zzu21 7 лет назад +1

      Nizar El-Zarif Next MacBook Pros possibly have AMD APUs that are customized for Apple. Later they are switching to ARM chips with a completely new OS.

    • @brandonholm5812
      @brandonholm5812 7 лет назад

      Charles Yeo If anyone can do it, it is Apple. They already made a switch from PowerPC to x86 Intel. And with the amount of performance they can get out of a passively cooled mobile processor, imagine what performance they can get out of a larger fan cooled chip.

    • @k0zzu21
      @k0zzu21 7 лет назад

      Brandon Holm What do you mean? All macbooks thermal throttle, thus giving less power than a laptop with adequate cooling having the same CPU.

    • @SurmaSampo
      @SurmaSampo 7 лет назад

      While I like the ARM architecture, it is only capable of 1 FPO per cycle and lacks compatibility with x86 software. Also, ARM cores use short RISC pipelines creating more operations to perform the same task as an x86 CPU. ARM cpu's may be more power efficient per cycle or operation but they are really terrible at running desktop software and very few desktop applications are written to run on them. Software written in high level languages such as java, .NET, pear, ruby, python, etc; are are even more problematic as they really on the sort of features that CPU architectures like x86, SPARC and Power offer to make execution more efficient.
      An ARM based macbook will be just an Ipad with a keyboard.

  • @SAUMIKSHASHWAT
    @SAUMIKSHASHWAT 6 лет назад +84

    Let us take a moment and appreciate what Apple is doing.

    • @Jonathan-cz4ky
      @Jonathan-cz4ky 4 года назад

      Mr Jayden while simultaneously selling an overpriced workstation, watches, phones and laptops for years. Their $700 option this year is the first time in years they’ve decided to come out with something without the Apple tax they scam people with.

    • @matto1540
      @matto1540 4 года назад +4

      Liam the 11 is fairly priced at $700, the mac pro is justifiable at higher configurations but not lower. their macbooks are hopefully getting better with the 16 inch leading it

    • @haridj8532
      @haridj8532 4 года назад

      Matthew O paying 700$ for an LCD screen isn’t worth it. I went for the 11 pro

    • @breadone_
      @breadone_ 4 года назад

      Liam how are they overpriced?

    • @hirakirubaleni6122
      @hirakirubaleni6122 4 года назад

      jainish patel Such is the trust that people have in Apple. Apple is not forcing anyone to buy their products. Anyone can try selling stands for $ 999. Why don’t other brands try to sell? Reason is simple. People care a damn for shit brands. Shit brands can sell only at shit prices and not because they love their customers

  • @YoussefAlmakdissi
    @YoussefAlmakdissi 6 лет назад +1

    IMPORTANT: 2:44 Why does wikipedia say that it uses LPDDR4X ram?

  • @shikhanshu
    @shikhanshu 6 лет назад +17

    when Gary explains, the world listens

  • @samspade1418
    @samspade1418 7 лет назад +13

    What everyone needs to remember though is that performance for smartphones only needs to be as good as the user needs it to be. One game, app, camera shot, etc., that opens two seconds faster, doesn't matter to most end users as long as the user experience is smooth. For many, many, many, people, flagship phones from two or three years ago are still plenty adequate. Something to think about in the Android vs. iPhone debate.

    • @BJ-fr5ls
      @BJ-fr5ls 6 лет назад +2

      Smartest comment yet. Most people can't really tell the difference. Consumers are so gullible

    • @QuesGer
      @QuesGer 6 лет назад

      +B J unless you're working with video processing and loading times.

    • @jamestor6700
      @jamestor6700 6 лет назад +1

      and why would you use video processing for a smartphone? editing is very limited and due to the weak cpu and gpu rendering is going to take awhile. only practical sense would be if your on the go and just trying to upload said video is going to eat your data like its not even funny. loading times are actually faster on android phones if you look at the tests

    • @xmark1440
      @xmark1440 6 лет назад

      Kyle Well maybe android can release something as good as iMovies for free. If video editing doesn’t matter to you then fine, but it does matter to at least some.

    • @StickMasterKai
      @StickMasterKai 6 лет назад

      Sam Spade To be fair, the majority of users who purchase the top of the line smartphones for a company , they're most likely have atleast 10 or more apps. People who tend to use an app or two purchase a cheap phone like an iPhone 5 or Note 4 etc..

  • @SkepTechTV
    @SkepTechTV 7 лет назад +32

    Hi Gary, fantastic video!
    You and your great content are outstanding as a Lighthouse on this platform. A classy RUclips benchmark! 👍

  • @henryochieng6892
    @henryochieng6892 6 лет назад +1

    Enjoyed the video. I appreciate the raw honesty which we all agree is lacking in most RUclips videos on the subject.

  • @humanvoice369
    @humanvoice369 4 года назад +3

    Your positivity is a breath of fresh air!💚

  • @DJaquithFL
    @DJaquithFL 7 лет назад +8

    Why do people give a crap what phones people use? These rants are insane. Android is more open but the cost is poor security and forget getting decent updates on your OS. There are only 2 phones on the market that offer a clean OS .. iPhone and Google Nexus now Pixel.
    Take the silly bias out and look deeply at the Pros & Cons of each platform.

  • @gregm7222
    @gregm7222 5 лет назад +3

    Thank U. Long time fan, 1st time commentor. A stright forward explanation and not tooo techy. Kuddos sir

  • @Zoolookuk
    @Zoolookuk Год назад +1

    You should do an updated version of this. I was really surprised to see how much faster my 2020 iPhone 12 (A14) is Vs Google's G2 chip in the 2022 Pixel Pro. It's not 5 - 10% difference in general tasks, it's 30 - 35% faster

    • @eldiablo7755
      @eldiablo7755 11 месяцев назад

      The G2 chip basically is the tweak Samsung chip.

  • @sp3c0ps
    @sp3c0ps 7 лет назад +169

    ITS OVER 9000!!!!

    • @UsmanKhan-uy1jl
      @UsmanKhan-uy1jl 6 лет назад +4

      Niels H what! 9000?!

    • @internziko
      @internziko 6 лет назад +1

      Niels H aaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!

    • @hund4440
      @hund4440 6 лет назад +1

      The benchmark score

    • @benjamal547
      @benjamal547 6 лет назад +3

      no wayyyyyy..dragon ball!!!

    • @wyattb3138
      @wyattb3138 6 лет назад +2

      Next time: Apple ~ 12000-15000, Qualcomm ~ 8000-10000.

  • @mikey187lfc
    @mikey187lfc 6 лет назад +7

    Benchmark and real life usage are two different things. I see the Snapdragon 845 is doing well in real life tests but not as good as the apple chip in benchmarks.
    If you buy a phone because of the chip then why bother. Its about hardware, software and which ecosystem you use.
    I'm happy with my Pixel XL from two years ago.

  • @leonlu3147
    @leonlu3147 6 лет назад +5

    I am really happy apple have faster chip because it drive competition like exynos and qualcomm to a degree that won't be seen if apple were slower. The performance jump from snapdragon 835 to 845 wasn't enough to catch up to the a11 but it's about a 35% improvement in one year. One aspect that I care about tho apple has yet to catch up and that is gpu

  • @shalala4217
    @shalala4217 6 лет назад

    One of the reasons because the a11 makes an impresive score on benchmarks its because has 8MB of L2 cache, witch its masive for a SOC, that made run the instruccions more faster without go to find the data to the L3 cache or even in the ram

  • @incognito8219
    @incognito8219 5 лет назад +6

    I'm about to make the jump from a Snapdragon 660 to 855. Life changing I expect 😁

    • @sathvikreddy4880
      @sathvikreddy4880 5 лет назад +2

      Me from 450 to 845 lol

    • @trin8835
      @trin8835 5 лет назад +2

      Me from snapdragon 808 to 425 :(

    • @mab3667
      @mab3667 5 лет назад +1

      Tri N Oof

    • @mab3667
      @mab3667 5 лет назад

      Shin z so iphone 7 to iphone X am I right? So how was the performance I can’t imagine there a huge gap because I have iphone 7 myself and it runs anything so smooth even heavy games at max graphics 60fps

    • @Colt8722
      @Colt8722 4 года назад

      I've got the 855 in my OnePlus 7pro and it's incredibly fast. This is the quickest phone I've ever used

  • @bomanijarvis1864
    @bomanijarvis1864 5 лет назад +4

    Thanks for the Great video. Very imformative

  • @321jeR
    @321jeR 5 лет назад +20

    This is what im trying to tell my android friends.
    Apple have good team and they investing very quality products.
    Remember guys
    1GB RAM iPhone better than 2GB or 3GB Android because ofGOOD memory management and cache allocation.

    • @amex4453
      @amex4453 5 лет назад +4

      congratulations , your parents must be proud . Also , that 1gb apple iphone would probably cost twice as much as a 4gb android.

    • @JohnDoe-dq7kn
      @JohnDoe-dq7kn 5 лет назад +7

      AM3X thats because that older iPhones with less ram are still running the latest software and age way better than androids. Comparatively they are still a way better value even if they cost more initially.

    • @emmyleke7049
      @emmyleke7049 5 лет назад

      How's a 1GB RAM equal to a 2GB RAM? Did you go to school?

    • @JohnDoe-dq7kn
      @JohnDoe-dq7kn 5 лет назад +5

      Emmy Leke because the iPhone is roughly twice as good as most androids in ram efficiency

    • @amex4453
      @amex4453 5 лет назад +1

      @@JohnDoe-dq7kn way better value? Dude....you could get two one plus 7's for the price of one iPhone so stfu

  • @ergindemir7366
    @ergindemir7366 6 лет назад +1

    Huge cache and optimized architecture is the main reason. However the real question is how can they achieve double the performance with the same power consumption.