Part 9 - Euler beam model vs. Timoshenko beam model

About the presenter:
• Recipient of the ASME Burt L. Newkirk Award.
• Recipient of the ASME Turbo Expo Best Paper Award (Structures and Dynamics Committee).
• Recipient of the Best Paper Award from International Rotor Dynamics Conference - IFToMM.
• Recipient of the ASME IGTI Young Engineer Award.
• Ph.D.
• American (US citizen)
• Email: [e-mail]
• LinkedIn: / rotordynamics
• Twitter: / rotordynamics1

[@RotorDynamics]

Your support means everything to us. If you find value in our videos, please consider sharing them with someone who would benefit. Thank you so much!

[@cck1496]

As usual excellent work....Keep it up....

[@RotorDynamics]

Thank you so much for your kind words and ongoing support! I'm thrilled to hear that you enjoyed the video. If you think it could be beneficial for your colleagues and engineering friends, please consider sharing it with them. Your support means a lot and helps me continue creating content. Keep learning and innovating! 🌟🔧 Don't forget to hit that share button!

[@bkoo3472]

Thank you for the nice video. One note is that the difference b/w E-B model and T model increases with the decrease in the ratio of the shaft dia and the length, D/L. A slender shaft shall be analyzed by the T model. Otherwise, the E-B model may work just fine.

[@RotorDynamics]

Thank you for your comment. You're absolutely right! The shaft D/L ratio affects the degree of difference between Euler and Timoshenko beam models.