From what I have read Champsosaurus was part of Choristodera a group that survived the End Cretaceous Mass extinction before suddenly declining 50 million years ago and going extinct 19 million years ago. The groups placement is apparently also controversial with their placement with more recent evidence suggesting they were members of Archosauromorpha.
Cool video but 2 mistakes 1 Tanystropheus is outdated 2 synapsids don't diverge from reptila i.e. synapsids split earlier, while still being amphibians
Synapsids did not diverge within Reptilia (they did diverge *from* it though, but I get what you mean), which is usually defined as a subset of Sauropsida but is often paraphyletic, excluding birds. They did both (Sauropsids and Synapsids) evolve from so-called Reptiliomorphs, though, which were not amphibians by any definition (usually referring to descendants of Batrachomorpha, a sister lineage to Reptiliomorpha). If by amphibians you mean Lissamphibia, probably including all living amphibians, that is an even more exclusive and modern group and even more incorrect.
I made the sentence regarding Synapsids and amphibians unclear, my fault. I just wanted to spread knowledge of synapsids "skipping" the reptile state. I don't know how to explain it in more detailed manner. That's how I made some confusion. Sorry
@@caviramus0993 No fault involved. I think the key to keep in mind is that the common ancestor of the two groups was already fully adapted to life on land, and so was "past" the amphibian stage.
The tanystropheus information is heavily outdated, tany was a terristrial fishing rod-like animal using it's neck like a rod to catch fish over de water
Very well made!!!! "...while young mesosaurs might have been fully aquatic, adult animals spent some time on land." - are we able to know for sure they were parareptilia, not amphibians?
Awsome vid , you could do a series with each dinosaurs of each country . P.S. tanystropheus wasn' built for swiming , with long and thin legs an a Titanic also thin neck , Things that don't help if you want to BE an aquatic animal.
Scutosaurus lived in the Late Permian period in Siberia (Russia) alongside Inostrancevia (Gorgonopsid), Diictodon and Rhinesuchus (Labyrinthodont)! Walking with Monsters!
This superb expose' further enforces the concept that the Triassic was Just extraordinarily Weird. even the end extinction was weird, some species cruising right through while other similar groups had the Snot kicked out of them.
here are my ideas for scientific greek names 1. Homicida Avis 2. Interfectorem Avis 3. Mortiferum Avis 4. Letalis Avis 5. Averopod or Aveopod (kill me don't know how to prefix)
I could be wrong, but I thought he called them 'Terrible' in the sense that they are terrifying? I think that's how people talked back then adunno xD I guess if we'd name them today we'd call them 'Scary Birds' but like in Latin or sumthn. EDIT: o 'Dinosaur' ain't Latin, it's actually Greek apparently. Dino comes from δεινός which means 'Fearfully Great'. The 'terrible' seems to be an outdated translation. If we put 'Scary Bird' into Greek we'd get τρομακτικό πουλί or 'Tromaktiko Pouli' seems like a mouthful lol Could also just go with 'DinoPouli' to keep the old Dino in there. Sounds a little better ;D
Dieter Gaudlitz what’s your point? Just because ichthyosaurs was warm blooded and had live birth doesn’t mean it’s not a reptile. If it descended from diapsid ancestors, it’s by definition a Sauropsid which are reptiles. This is why birds are also considered reptiles, they descended from diapsid ancestors.
@Dieter Gaudlitz No, it's not. Those names represent distinct lineages. This branch of biology is called phylogenetics, which is what the video you're watching is about. Humans are apes because we come from the ape lineage, and we are also mammals, therapsids, and synapsids, but we are not reptiles because we do not come from within the reptile lineage. Although you don't hear them be called reptiles often, birds are indeed reptiles because they form the reptile class along with crocodilians, turtles, and lepidosaurs. However, we are all united by the amniote lineages, thus humans and reptiles are both amniotes. The reptiles we are all familiar with don't even have a whole lot in common with synapsids, a couple examples I can name are the difference in the structure of their skull: synapsids have one pair of gaps in their skull while reptiles, being diapsids, have two pairs (turtles are an exception), and the differentiation in teeth later down the line as well.
The last paragraph proves to me to you're a delusional emotional idiot and possibly a a cryptozoology-creationist. Fact is that the openings in the skulls of diapsids and synapsids are significant in differentiating clades of these organisms.
@rent a shill I ask because other than Cartorhynchus Lenticarpus, I can't find any fully terrastrial ancestor(Permian) of Ichthyosaurs on e internet.. and in Wikipedia, e order and family of Ichthyosaurs still contains e word "ichthyo", which is weird for land dwelling, scuttling, crawling, galloping, burrowing, climbing, jumping cousins of Ichthyosaurs..
@rent a shill if there were any fossilized remains of land ichthyosaur cousins, they're probably on mountain peaks or subducted into e mantle or weathered..
An Anthony : du hättest zeitlich besser einordnen müssen, so dass in jedem Zeitalter nur die Organismen gezeigt werden, die auch gelebt haben und zwar nach Reihenfolge. In diesem Fall ist es mal im Karbon, mal im späten Trias, mal wieder im Karbon und so weiter. Vielleicht überarbeitest du das noch einmal und gehst der Reihenfolge nach, also welches Tier sich in welchem Zeitalter entwickelt hat, so dass es chronologisch passt. Ansonsten Daumen nach Norden 👍
@@williamjordan5554 No. you’re the one who’s aid it was wrong, and you’re not even going to bother to support your own damn argument. Not going to waste my time with it when it’s evidently not worth your time.
Yeah, I am a fast reader but the rest of the people in my class are not the information while good was pointless because you didn't leave the information on the screen long enough for everyone to read children and adults and pictures went by too fast for them to take in everything so we just turned it off and went to something else
![ARGENTINA vs. CHILE [3-0] | RESUMEN | ELIMINATORIAS SUDAMERICANAS | FECHA 7](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/De3AWmXzhuA/mqdefault.jpg)
1:52 what a handsome boi he is
lol-
I love Triassic
Unreal
From what I have read Champsosaurus was part of Choristodera a group that survived the End Cretaceous Mass extinction before suddenly declining 50 million years ago and going extinct 19 million years ago. The groups placement is apparently also controversial with their placement with more recent evidence suggesting they were members of Archosauromorpha.
superb illustrations that actually educate.
Turtle like reptiles is the main inspiration of Haxorus
Pokemon lmao
Great video, love how thorough it is...I would absolutely love and appreciate videos like this for every clade
It's done, check my playlist about Evolution 👍
Cool video but 2 mistakes
1 Tanystropheus is outdated
2 synapsids don't diverge from reptila i.e. synapsids split earlier, while still being amphibians
Kacperaton 09 You are right and WTF ?! Lanthanosuchus is a STEGOCEPHALIAN, not an amniote.
Synapsids did not diverge within Reptilia (they did diverge *from* it though, but I get what you mean), which is usually defined as a subset of Sauropsida but is often paraphyletic, excluding birds. They did both (Sauropsids and Synapsids) evolve from so-called Reptiliomorphs, though, which were not amphibians by any definition (usually referring to descendants of Batrachomorpha, a sister lineage to Reptiliomorpha). If by amphibians you mean Lissamphibia, probably including all living amphibians, that is an even more exclusive and modern group and even more incorrect.
no no, they didn't evolve directly from amphibians. Synapsids and sauropsids (reptiles basically) descended from a common amniote ancestor.
I made the sentence regarding Synapsids and amphibians unclear, my fault.
I just wanted to spread knowledge of synapsids "skipping" the reptile state.
I don't know how to explain it in more detailed manner.
That's how I made some confusion.
Sorry
@@caviramus0993 No fault involved. I think the key to keep in mind is that the common ancestor of the two groups was already fully adapted to life on land, and so was "past" the amphibian stage.
The tanystropheus information is heavily outdated, tany was a terristrial fishing rod-like animal using it's neck like a rod to catch fish over de water
@@ceesan5605 i got my info from a text book, wikipedia and t-rey video about tanystropheus
5:24 wanna bet that they might be the ancestors of dragons?
Very possible
@@user-td4ed3mx2e and probable.
If mythological dragons were real.
@@drswag0076 scutosaurus is huge
0:40 plot twist: every vertebrate except fish and amphibians are reptiles
And every terrestrial vertebrates are fish with legs
@ true
@ a grandma, jasper, chuck e, munch, a chef, a cat, at chuck e cheese
Amazing! Almost like you were there filming. Remarkably informative nice work. Thanks!
Thank you 😊
Good video like ever. But now you put great images and video captations. Really Fine.
Very well made!!!! "...while young mesosaurs might have been fully aquatic, adult animals spent some time on land." - are we able to know for sure they were parareptilia, not amphibians?
i guess it is kind of randomly asking but does anybody know of a good site to watch new movies online ?
@Aldo Gannon I use Flixzone. Just search on google for it =)
@Aldo Gannon i use Flixzone. Just google for it :)
More reptiles please
Awsome vid , you could do a series with each dinosaurs of each country .
P.S. tanystropheus wasn' built for swiming , with long and thin legs an a Titanic also thin neck , Things that don't help if you want to BE an aquatic animal.
12:05 a crocodile not crocodile. Thank you evolution...
Bibliography???
I'm french !!
Google phytosaur.
Spculative evolution part 3 please
What happened to the evolution of crocodiles video???
Scutosaurus Lived in the Permian not the Triassic
Shut up
You shut up I’m not trying to be mean
Scutosaurus lived in the Late Permian period in Siberia (Russia) alongside Inostrancevia (Gorgonopsid), Diictodon and Rhinesuchus (Labyrinthodont)! Walking with Monsters!
초기 파충류의 똑같은 진화
Can i please know what soundtrack you used for the background of this video?
What is your favourite prehistoric animal may favourite is hasst eagle and argentavis and short faced bear and American mastodon and smilodon
Its *ironic* that the Arhtropods've had the total dominance.
Only to be lost evolutionary race; so easily
The arthropods dominated the Cambrian and Carboniferous time periods!
This superb expose' further enforces the concept that the Triassic was Just extraordinarily Weird. even the end extinction was weird, some species cruising right through while other similar groups had the Snot kicked out of them.
HAIL
Saludos señor pain podrías acer un video animales con simbiosis por favor
Scientists: name lizards ‘lizards’
Also scientists: name dinosaurs ‘terrible lizards’
Dinosaurs: wtf bro :(
here are my ideas for scientific greek names
1. Homicida Avis
2. Interfectorem Avis
3. Mortiferum Avis
4. Letalis Avis
5. Averopod or Aveopod (kill me don't know how to prefix)
I could be wrong, but I thought he called them 'Terrible' in the sense that they are terrifying? I think that's how people talked back then adunno xD
I guess if we'd name them today we'd call them 'Scary Birds' but like in Latin or sumthn.
EDIT: o 'Dinosaur' ain't Latin, it's actually Greek apparently.
Dino comes from δεινός
which means 'Fearfully Great'. The 'terrible' seems to be an outdated translation.
If we put 'Scary Bird' into Greek we'd get τρομακτικό πουλί or 'Tromaktiko Pouli' seems like a mouthful lol
Could also just go with 'DinoPouli' to keep the old Dino in there. Sounds a little better ;D
Where were the pterosaurs because they're Archosaurs
Evolution of spiders .
I would like to know the article where this phylogeny were published
I would like to kno y u ugly
@@kadenbanks742 The are no current reaserch on this topic
Can you do Evolution of Salamanders
You should’ve used “Amniota” instead of Reptilia. Synapsids aren’t reptiles.
Good vid tho.
Dieter Gaudlitz what’s your point? Just because ichthyosaurs was warm blooded and had live birth doesn’t mean it’s not a reptile. If it descended from diapsid ancestors, it’s by definition a Sauropsid which are reptiles. This is why birds are also considered reptiles, they descended from diapsid ancestors.
@Dieter Gaudlitz No, it's not. Those names represent distinct lineages. This branch of biology is called phylogenetics, which is what the video you're watching is about. Humans are apes because we come from the ape lineage, and we are also mammals, therapsids, and synapsids, but we are not reptiles because we do not come from within the reptile lineage. Although you don't hear them be called reptiles often, birds are indeed reptiles because they form the reptile class along with crocodilians, turtles, and lepidosaurs. However, we are all united by the amniote lineages, thus humans and reptiles are both amniotes. The reptiles we are all familiar with don't even have a whole lot in common with synapsids, a couple examples I can name are the difference in the structure of their skull: synapsids have one pair of gaps in their skull while reptiles, being diapsids, have two pairs (turtles are an exception), and the differentiation in teeth later down the line as well.
The last paragraph proves to me to you're a delusional emotional idiot and possibly a a cryptozoology-creationist.
Fact is that the openings in the skulls of diapsids and synapsids are significant in differentiating clades of these organisms.
I prefer Mammal like Reptiles
@@RamonaWagnerRDF Nah more like Stem Mammal or Proto Mammal.
@4:38 H to the Izzo V to Izzy... fo sheezy my neezy keep my arms so greasy.
Answer me and after the movie about early reptiles will you then do a speculative evolution of part 3, Arachnids or maybe already about dinosaurs?
Arachnids, I don't think I'll do another speculative evolution video
@
You haven't found any more illustrations from Satoshi Kawasaki on Speculative Evolution?
@ kids learning tube
Do we have any evidence of any stem reptiles in other words reptile like amphibians
Noah Olson Casineria, perhaps.
Which clade/order/family/genus were terrastrial ancestors of ichthyosaurs from?
@rent a shill thank u..
@rent a shill I ask because other than Cartorhynchus Lenticarpus, I can't find any fully terrastrial ancestor(Permian) of Ichthyosaurs on e internet.. and in Wikipedia, e order and family of Ichthyosaurs still contains e word "ichthyo", which is weird for land dwelling, scuttling, crawling, galloping, burrowing, climbing, jumping cousins of Ichthyosaurs..
@rent a shill if there were any fossilized remains of land ichthyosaur cousins, they're probably on mountain peaks or subducted into e mantle or weathered..
👏👏👏👏😮😮
An Anthony : du hättest zeitlich besser einordnen müssen, so dass in jedem Zeitalter nur die Organismen gezeigt werden, die auch gelebt haben und zwar nach Reihenfolge. In diesem Fall ist es mal im Karbon, mal im späten Trias, mal wieder im Karbon und so weiter. Vielleicht überarbeitest du das noch einmal und gehst der Reihenfolge nach, also welches Tier sich in welchem Zeitalter entwickelt hat, so dass es chronologisch passt. Ansonsten Daumen nach Norden 👍
O brasil teve varios repteis primitivos
Verdade
Sim
E a sopa do macaco uma delicia kkkkkk
Wtf
I love reptiles
Lizards looked like that along time ago🦎
5:22 thats a fucking dragon
Where did you fined that intro
i have varanus nebulosus clearly descendant of those creatures
What’s is scary like?: Dinosaurs or Aliens.
Ahem, Birds are Reptiles
Mammals are reptiles, reptiles are fish..
@ crocodiles and birds are closest relatives and classified as archosauria
I just want to know where the animation from the start is from.
It’s from naked science mankind rising.
america and china india europe australia all country to help clining activities very happy
The tanystrophious is outdated
Claudiosaurus look like a tiny dinosaur
Aren’t phytosaurs,paracrocodylomorphes and rauisuchians pseudosuchians?
Tani was terrestrial. Not aquatic
Synapsids isn't reptiles, But Synapsids is also proto mammals and reptile.
Synapsids are not reptiles, they split off before true reptiles (sauropsids) evolved.
Did you just post drepanasaur porn at 7:57
Evolution of Donald Trump?
Donk ---> Donk
Donk supporter?
Great but could you ditch the computer voice and use a real human one?
1st
Synapsids aren’t reptiles
Some dubious info here.
Such as?
@@baneofbanes I'm not gonna watch it again.
@@williamjordan5554 So you might as well be talking out of you ass.
@@baneofbanes Research the info for yourself, smegma boy. I'm not gonna re-watch a 14-minute video for your benefit. And learn to spell.
@@williamjordan5554 No. you’re the one who’s aid it was wrong, and you’re not even going to bother to support your own damn argument.
Not going to waste my time with it when it’s evidently not worth your time.
Would have been a great video. I just can’t stand these auto text readers.
00:40 boring biology
Yeah, I am a fast reader but the rest of the people in my class are not the information while good was pointless because you didn't leave the information on the screen long enough for everyone to read children and adults and pictures went by too fast for them to take in everything so we just turned it off and went to something else
Nonsense.
How?
Very boring
Then fuck you
Why da fuck did u watch it