I got both microphones and I was finding the Hyperx to be little bit better (sound wise) along with having a shock mount and pop filter. Also, I was lucky to get a quadcast s for only $120 from best buy when it was on sale (now back to original price for people who didn’t get lucky :( as of today)). The blue yeti at the time was $100 on sale. So I thought was not spend $20 more and get an awsome mircophone with rgb.
Another thing that I want to add is that the blu software (blue yeti) is a mess so far (constantly crashes randomly) (yes I even went as far as to reinstalling software to try and fix issue but the issue still exists). The Hyperx one is stable so far.
Hyper X sounded slightly mid heavy, but more natural balanced. Blue Yeti seemed to do a better job picking up lows / bass and seemed to have compression & EQ on by default. On Hyper X you sounded a bit more like a throat voice but it had much more clarity, but on Yeti it sounded like you had a deeper chest voice but was more muddy. Though yeti was easier on the ears because your voice was deeper and smoother, I don't like any default pre-EQ / pre-Compression, because there's no easy way to make it sound natural. Compression on by default will amplify low sounds like PC / Fans by default and you'll be forced to use a noise gate. It's better to do it in post. It's like having a front facing phone camera that adds skin smothering / beauty filters by default, might make you look good in the photograph, but it's not RAW / Natural, and there's no easy way to undo it. So in my opionion, Blue yeti is a bit of an illusion because it's EQ / Compression makes it sound better, but Hyper X is more natural, and you can always tweak it to your liking using Voicemeter Banana. Aesthetics of HyperX are certainly a big selling point too, and is one of the best on the market. Very clean cylindrical profile, without obnoxious shapes.
@@tookieshmookie8888 could be, there's a lot of great new mics for podcasting with auto-leveling, but mostly if you got a good sounding room, and the mic position is right that makes all the difference.
So I have the blue yeti and I’m thinking about getting hyperx quadcast s because my blue yeti is plugged into my Xbox series X and is picking up a lot of background noise and people talking around me so I’m wondering if the hyperx quadcast is any better and if it picks up less background noise in the blue yeti
I got both microphones and I was finding the Hyperx to be little bit better (sound wise) along with having a shock mount and pop filter. Also, I was lucky to get a quadcast s for only $120 from best buy when it was on sale (now back to original price for people who didn’t get lucky :( as of today)). The blue yeti at the time was $100 on sale. So I thought was not spend $20 more and get an awsome mircophone with rgb.
Another thing that I want to add is that the blu software (blue yeti) is a mess so far (constantly crashes randomly) (yes I even went as far as to reinstalling software to try and fix issue but the issue still exists). The Hyperx one is stable so far.
Hyper X sounded slightly mid heavy, but more natural balanced. Blue Yeti seemed to do a better job picking up lows / bass and seemed to have compression & EQ on by default. On Hyper X you sounded a bit more like a throat voice but it had much more clarity, but on Yeti it sounded like you had a deeper chest voice but was more muddy. Though yeti was easier on the ears because your voice was deeper and smoother, I don't like any default pre-EQ / pre-Compression, because there's no easy way to make it sound natural. Compression on by default will amplify low sounds like PC / Fans by default and you'll be forced to use a noise gate. It's better to do it in post. It's like having a front facing phone camera that adds skin smothering / beauty filters by default, might make you look good in the photograph, but it's not RAW / Natural, and there's no easy way to undo it. So in my opionion, Blue yeti is a bit of an illusion because it's EQ / Compression makes it sound better, but Hyper X is more natural, and you can always tweak it to your liking using Voicemeter Banana. Aesthetics of HyperX are certainly a big selling point too, and is one of the best on the market. Very clean cylindrical profile, without obnoxious shapes.
I have a problem with noise with my blue yeti do you recommend quadcast s ?
i used to have a yeti, it did me well for the time before i upgraded
Do you think that the Quadcast is better than blue yeti?
@@tookieshmookie8888 could be, there's a lot of great new mics for podcasting with auto-leveling, but mostly if you got a good sounding room, and the mic position is right that makes all the difference.
So I have the blue yeti and I’m thinking about getting hyperx quadcast s because my blue yeti is plugged into my Xbox series X and is picking up a lot of background noise and people talking around me so I’m wondering if the hyperx quadcast is any better and if it picks up less background noise in the blue yeti
So you play customs. Also love that map
You remembered your password finally
The semester ended so I finally and some time on my hand 😂
He quit dozing and uploaded.
Ye
oi no dozing
Yeyeee
Yeti or bust
QuadCast bruh