For sure. I was born in 83 so I remember these being everywhere as well. I always got the impression that they were better than the J-Cars from GM, but my parents were Ford people.
My family collectively drove a '93 Tempo 2.3L 2-door for 22 years. The ONLY problems we ever had with it were the harmonic balancer and heater core. That's it. I may be a Toyota guy but that Tempo was a damn fine, reliable car.
My grandmother had a loaded 88 tempo that she brought in 89 as a returned lease from Hertz rental. Had under 20k miles when she bought it and was a fantastic car for the next decade. I still remember the comfy burgundy valour seats!
Currently driving a 1996 Mercury Mystique 2.0 5-speed with over 300k miles on it. Drives like new, doesn't burn any oil! Really fun to drive, 32mpg all day long :)
I drove an '86 Tempo in high school. My dad bought a '90 Tempo and I remember it being the only car I'd ever driven that had the automatic shoulder belts. So glad that feature didn't last long.
My wife and I tested a Tempo in 1989. Then we drove a Probe, based on the Mazda 626. Man, the contrast was night and day -- the Probe was so much smoother riding and more responsive. We bought the Probe.
U made a very wise decision I bought my used ford probe in 2000 for $700 its now got about 240k miles on it and still runs great. I have never had to do major repairs on it.
I had two Ford Tempos and 1 Mercury Topaz. Even on the used car market back then those two were a lot of car for the money. The one I fondest of was a 1986 Tempo GL coupe. This one was a special order,as it was equipped with the 2.3 liter HSO(High Specific Output) version of the HSC engine. And as a bonus,it was equipped with the 5-speed manual transmission. It had the "two tone" paint scheme (red on top,with gray on the lower body and bumpers) and it had the trunk mounted luggage rack. That car was A LOT of fun to drive, something that couldn't be said often of Fords from that era. I still miss it.
7:10. The commercial was filmed in Ontario, Canada, on the Canadian Pacific Railway's Owen Sound branch. The scenic hairpin turn at 7:20 is on the Forks of the Credit [River] Road between Brampton and Orangeville. The CP Rail locomotive is pulling Toronto GO Transit single-level commuter cars of the period.
My '91 Escort 40 MPG but had as much HP as a moped. My Tempo, had a blue two door that looked great. But was a tractor with the shell of a car. LOL In the Ad they show the Tempo passing a semi, yeah only downhill and a tail wind!! I never had too many problems with mine ,mechanically. But both cars were like driving a lawnmower or a tractor. Very crude machines. I bought my '91 Escort new with air conditioning it came to $7,000. I skipped the power window option. lol
We owned 3 Ford Tempos and 3 Mercury Topazes. Ranging from a 1984 Tempo that we paid $110.00 for it to a 1991 Mercury Topaz. The most we ever paid was $600.00 for a fully loaded 1986 Mercury Topaz LS, which of course was the fancy model. Everyone of them were good cars.
The Honda Dealer had a Pubic Auction for Trade ins during the 1990's and a Tempo went for $25 and no auction fees, I bought a 87 T- Bird with the 5.0 EFI Engine for $450 and it was a great Car .
My wife and I inherited a Toespaz (as I liked to call it) from her dad. I think it was a '92. It wasn't sporty. It wasn't fast. It wasn't in any way cool, but it had a spoiler on the back and it certainly served its purpose. It was quite comfortable and fairly easy to work on. I repaired and refreshed a few things myself and had a bit of suspension / alignment work done. In the late summer of 2006 after I had just retired from teaching, we drove it from Vancouver, B.C. through Yellowstone and on to New York, Connecticut, Maine, through Vermont and into Sherbrooke, Quebec where our lad was attending university. We stayed in and explored the area for few days while we also transferred ownership of the car to him. We had him drive us to the airport and bade the car adieu. He used it for the next 2 years by which time its time had come. Good times. Thanks for reminding me of that wonderful road trip made possible by that good old toespaz.
I had an 88 Ford Tempo 5speed. It was one of the best cars I've ever owned. Not the nicest or most luxurious, nor the fastest. Yet it always started, was fun to drive & I put a nice stereo in it. The only thing I ever had to put into it was a new clutch. Eventually the body rusted out due to all the winter salt they put out here in Ontario winter's. Modern cars are too complicated.
I bought the Tempo GL manual in '87. Put 225k miles on it before it was totaled while parked on the street. Original clutch and never had an engine issue. My model appears @6:57. ❤
Listen, I'm, glad someone did this, and SO well. Wow. I'm probably the only American that's still craving a Ford Tempo as I actually was in the dealership as a kid when it was new in late 83. I thought it was the most modern looking regular car I had ever seen. I was IN the dealer lot, and sat in one with red interiors and it felt like a spaceship. The red swallowed you up. It had a little drawing of a car down low in the center console that notified you of doors, trunk, etc. being open. Coolest thing ever and as a kid I had to have that. Then I sat in a white one with blue interior and was immediately stunned at how a simple interior color change can change your entire mood when you entered the car. I was hooked. My father never did get to buy one but the longing for one is still in my blood. Revolutionary car and excellent video with factual information all around.
We had a 1985 Tempo, 4 cylinder 5 speed. It was a great car, lasted a long time, held up with no repairs, just tires, brakes, a battery and oil changes. Great mileage on my work commute and on vacations. The trunk held a lot more than other small cars. I would buy another one, I sure am not going to buy a battery powered car.
Tempo sure did deliver on value for the dollar. My mom had an 89 and i owned four of them over the years. The automatic transmission one’s ate tie rod ends and muffler systems at an above average rate. But neither of those parts were actually expensive. The air conditioning was super powerful and the fuel injected ones gave adequate performance. Overall I cannot say that I had any serious issues with any of them. I did my own maintenance and oil changes, they were easy to service and the diesel version was phenomenal on fuel if you were willing to live with the slow acceleration in city driving. On the freeway the diesel was great. Many people hated them, but I think they were very good and enjoyed my experience with them.
I bought an '86 Tempo GL 5-speed to replace my VW Bug when its engine let go. It had about 70k miles on it when I bought it; I kept it going for another 125k. Decent car, but its front end got chewed up by Denver's pothole-laden streets. I replaced the tie rod ends twice on it. But other than a leaking power steering pump, it still ran pretty strong when I sold it.
I had 2. An 84 5spd loaded with every option including premium sound and flip up sunroof. One of my favorite cars I have ever owned. The carburetor sucked. The 93 was V6 and way faster than it should have been. Unfortunately the V6 was automatic. But the most comfortable seats I have ever sat in.
Had a 85 sport gl 5 speed. First new car we ever bought. I got 38 mpg on a highway trip. Averaged 31 mpg. Fought distributor issues and inner tie rod ends later on before selling.
Lmao, now you mention it, I just checked too & you're right! Just mix a few words around... This would not pass any plagiarism checks. Laughing here in Australia! =)
I bought a brand new Tempo L (base model) in 1986 immediately after graduating college. It provided solid dependable transportation for years. I sold it to a neighbors high school kid in 1999 for $200. That was a great car for the money.
My dad had a 84 tempo with a manual transmission. Compared to my mom's 84 escort station wagon it was a rocket ship. I still remember going to Zarowni Motors to pick both cars up with my dad.They finally ended up selling both those cars in 2000. I can't believe i sat in those cars from elementary school all the way until i was finished with my studies
My parents had 2 Ford Tempo's - a base 1986 GL and a loaded '87 GL Sport. Both cars had the 5-speed manual. My siblings and I all learned to drive on those cars. No problems with either car in the 5 years or so my family owned them.
I just stopped driving one of these things. 1983 ford Tempo with the 2.3 - 4 cylinder could do 0 - 60 in 8 seconds. I kid you not. Best beater I ever drove. Raced everyone with that thing. Absolute beast in the winter. Got it given to me and drove it for like 3 years until the transmission failed from me stepping on it. It died last year. Was going to take it to the drag strip for confirmation on how fast it was. I was beating 4x4 trucks in the winter. Absolutely trashing some low power 4x4's with a ford tempo. Carb even. Best beater I ever drove.
Lol dude, as George Carlin would say, you're almost literally exploding with BS! There just plain ain't no way a 40 year old 2.3 tempo did 0-60 in 8 seconds, no specs I can find anywhere say it could go that fast even when it was brand new. Quit making stuff up to try and sound cool, we can all see right through it
@@Atari2600Gamer Meh. I had one. It had the 2.3 ohc. Carb engine. Power locks, with air and cruise. That first gear would hold on until the cows came home. It was awesome. I could not believe it. In winter it was a beast. Like it was awesome in the snow. Both wheels just went for it. Great traction and it was light as hell. 13 inch wheels so I guess it had more torque cause they be smaller. I found some other people online who had one like mine. They had some stories. Did not take me long to find them. I will say that most don't know that carb is very finicky in those cars. There is a vacum part that fails and will cause the engine to get too much gas thereby causing it to lose power and smell. lolz! A freaking 7 dollar part and it was FIXED. So many of these cars be running around smelling with lost power. Crazy man!
@@macsvoltage5723 Sounds more like you have a REALLY optimistic sense of time and speed lmao. It might've been light, but it wasn't exactly a powerhouse either. If it was really that fast, how come nobody talks about it?
@@Atari2600GamerFord had great engineers back in the day and Ford's motto back then was TORQUE TORQUE TORQUE so I would not be surprised to hear stories of these little TORQUE MONSTERS!
@@Atari2600Gamer You know, I don't care what you think. You have no idea how much fun that car was and no one cares if you don't believe. It was the best beater I ever drove. The owner is a friend of mine and it was his first car ever. Then his mother bought it off him and drove it to work for like 20 years. I got it with less than 70 thousand clicks on the speedo. The car did not run great until the carb was fixed. After that was when I found out it had POWER. My buddy said it went like snot when it ran good but could never get it running great all the time. It always smelled when starting the thing cause it was flooding. This was COMMON for these cars and it was just the vacume thingy for the carb that failed. 7 dollar part and it was fixed. If anyone has one of these cars with the carb, you probably need to change that part. After that, the engine woke up and had the power. No more smell when starting and the first gear holds until like 60 km/hr or something crazy like that. I beat so many cars in my town. That white Tempo had a reputation. A few people tired to run me off the road cause they be beat fair and square during the winter. lolz!
My first car was a red 5spd Tempo coupe so I've always had a bit of a soft spot for these. I have no complaints about it either then or now! I do feel it was kinda let down by its dinosaur HSC motor & pushrod non-crossflow head which was already fairly obsolete long before 1984. But a good reliable torquey one nevertheless. People loved to hate on Tempos and Topazes but the tuth is they were actually really good cars.. And you could have driven other more expensive economy cars on the market at the time that were SSOOOOOO MUCH WORSE TO DRIVE in every conceivable way back then! (ahem cough cough like literally *any* dodge K car derivative ever produced 🤢🤮)
Hey, it's my first car! I had a 91 Topaz GS, it wasn't stellar, but it was mine. Looking back, it wasn't the greatest car, but for its time, it was economical. Cash for Clunkers destroyed these time capsules
Had a New 86 Tempo manual and rally liked it . Traded it around 70 K with no problems. Auto transmissions were a different story - DOGS. Lucky to get 60 K on an Auto without a replaced Trans.
Great video! My college car in the 90's was a 1989 Mercury Topaz LTS. Car was actually pretty reliable and surprisingly good in the snow with proper snow tires.
V6 5-speed stick shift Tempo/Topaz were very fast for the day..... the Diesel Tempo/Topaz could get a real world 43 mpg all day long, no power, but all the cars were slow back then, so it wasn't a big deal....
I had a 1984 Mercury Topaz for a company car, a 2 door, with a manual transmission and the fancy Michelin tires and rims. It wasn't a great engine for a manual and felt like a truck when it revved, but it was ok. The one I had was a grey color at 3:00 into the video.
My first car was a 86 Tempo I got it in 1994. Few years later I got a 1992 Mercury Topaz XR5 V6 5 speed 2 door. XR5 V6 only made in 92. Very rare and I never saw another one on the road. It was a fun car.
I never saw a manual V6 tempo or topaz IRL. That was a very good find. I've heard a few people call the 5 speed manual tempo the baby SHO because it was actually more fun to drive than it should have been.
October 1984 my family's lumber company purchased 3 Tempos to replace 3 Fairmonts. Two were used by outside salesmen, one was kept at the office for people to run errands. They were durable and reliable cars, accelerated way better than the 6 cylinder Fairmonts they replaced, and when you put snow tires in them, they could go until snow packed up under the belly. By 1986, my father was so impressed with them he got my sister a Tempo Sport (2 door) to drive to HS then college. Last Tempo I saw driving daily was my exbrother inlaws Deisel Tempo he got when a customer dropped it off at his shop and abandoned it. Tattered seats, failed paint, but the engine and transmission had never needed major repairs and it had 380K on the odometer. Barry named the car Los Tempos and his brother Chris drove it most of the time. As Barry once said, Chris could be given an anvil for Christmas and my New Years it would be broken. Well Chris met his match with Los Tempos - Chris passed away and the car was still going. Sure wish Ford built such durability and reliability today.
My parents owned a 1992 Red Tempo 4 door. By the late '90s with 120k miles on it the 4cyl engine was worn out. We lived in WNY so it had to always go up hills. They bought it used from Hertz when rental car companies sold their cars off with about 36k on the odometer.
I had to replace the head gasket on my employer's carbureted Tempo with the 2.3L years ago; it was my first experience with torque-to-yield head bolts. A broken bolt caused the gasket to fail, but I lapped the head flat on a piece of plate glass with valve-grinding compound and installed new bolts to spec. Must not have screwed up too bad as the car ran good as new until it was traded...
I owned 2 , one was a tempo & other was a topaz .The tempo was a daily driver , and topaz was a fix & flip car . I enjoyed both of them , always started & super easy to repair . Both of them had almost 200,000 when they were sold .
The rush of power from the Vulcan V6 option was hardly felt, because V6's also got a numerically lower final drive ratio to keep fuel economy up. It did make highway speeds feel less fatiguing though (2000 rpm purr instead of nearly 3000 rpm roar).
I was working for Ford at the time. I took a brand new Tempo off the truck and floored it on a road test. The vehicle tried to dive into the ditch. I then immediately let off the gas pedal, and it tried to swerve back to the left. Torque steer light crazy, handling like garbage. And to think Ford sold them for 11 years...
I worked for Ford Motor Company back in the early 80's. Tempo/Topaz had so many driveability issues that Ford published a bound book of Technical Service Bulletins just on their driveability issues. Most got remedied with EFI.
I have always considered these personal transportation options for people who didn't like cars or non-enthusiasts that didn't want to take the bus, ride a bicycle or walk. Another more practical reason for producing these plain vanilla boxes was CAFE, the Corporate Average Fuel Economy law enacted in 1978 and put into effect for the 1980 model year requiring all carmakers in the USA to meet a minimum average fuel economy across their entire fleet. Sell more fuel efficient cars, your average goes up. Sell more gas guzzlers, your average goes down. Carmakers were docked penalties for missing CAFE targets across their fleet. The law applied to non-commercial passenger cars under 8,500 pounds in curb weight. Ford could theoretically take financial losses on each car if they sold enough of them to dodge being penalized for missing the CAFE targets. Just another possibility I would put out there.
All of this true. What didn't I mention the Ford Finance, parts sales, and extended warranties all helped Ford produce a profit even if they lost a bit on the car sale itself.
Dad bought an 86 Tempo. The thing was a constant headache for him. Warped brake rotors, bent door hinges, rusted door panels, and a litany of other issues. It was always in the shop for major repairs - thankfully, always on Ford’s dime. Dad owned other Fords that had no issues. The Tempo was not one of them.
These cars especially last generation were so well styled. Just a simple and attractive car design that aged pretty well in my opinion. I had a 92 Tempo coupe for a brief period of time in the 2010s. It was very dilapidated but I learned a lot about engines working on that car.
Great video again. These were such mundane vehicles back in the 80s. I was of driving age in 1985/6 and dad was quite loyal to fords and mercury's. I fell in love with the escort along that time and eventually buying a 90 gt. I couldn't help but quietly cheer these cars on as a ford enthusiasts at the time. Watching their evolution was satisfying and somewhat exciting with the v6 models. The only sad thing about these in my opinion is they were to closely engineered with the escort/lynx and therefore they weren't much roomier for being a larger vehicle. I also believe the forthcoming contour didnt puck up where the tempo left off but rather reset that model spot until later in its model life. Thanks for another informative video and a trip down memory lane.
The sales continued to dwindle throughout the 80s and early 90s even with refreshes and redesigns. More and more people were going to Toyota, Honda, Subaru, Mazda and (even Nissan). Even Mitsubishi used be popular back then. American brands were selling to the same customers every few years and that’s how they got by. The Japanese, especially Honda and Toyota, where taking customers from American brands which is how they’ve managed to gain so much market share in the US. By word of mouth, people knew how much more reliable and fun Japanese cars had become.
Now, idiot Americans wonder where all of the middle class manufacturing has gone. All foreign car manufacturing is non-union, genius. The Tempo was an extremely reliable car.
Your exactly right. I worked as a Chrysler tech in the 90s and watched it continue. Chrysler was king of the Mini Van sales that kept that corp flush with cash. By the early 2000s sales were falling to Toyota and Honda which took over and now dominate the mini van market.
Agree about Toyota and Honda. But Nissan was a much bigger player back then than Honda which was often named the littlest of the Japanese 3. But Subaru, Mazda were not popular. If you ask their CEOs they would rather keep the popularity they have today with a much bigger lineup than they did back in the 80s and they're arguably more reliable now than back then. The D3 never excelled marketing nor building a compact sedan, they didn't listened despite owning shares and forming joint ventures with Japanese automakers.
@@engineer_alvyes because amongst other reasons Gm and Ford have partnered with other brands. You may be thinking about the last few years but there were times that the Focus and Cruze have been extremely popular
@@jamesmedina2062 and now they're gone. The Focus was solid from 2005 to 2011 when they went all in with Duratec engines and regular automatics and pretty much all manual ones were good. And they were the best selling compact for a couple years. The Cruze sold well at the beginning but had problems before they switched to the LE2 engine in 2016. And in typical GM fashion once they made a solid car they chose to discontinue it
The SalesMen & Mechanics at the Ford dealer I was a service Porter at in my Senior year of H.S. Would refer to the Tempo & Topaz as baby Sable&Taurus when they wanted me to go out back & bring one in for new car delivery prep
My father bought a 1984 topaz [4cyl] and my mother got a 1986.[4cyl] Both junk! the 84' was worse. It had a troublesome carburetor. Transmission failed at 40k miles. 3 speed automatics [but you could get a manual] 15 mpg,and the engine was screaming a 65 mph. Mufflers rusted out at 20 k miles. I could go on and on and on.......
I recall these well...the main problem with both these and the following Contour, was that Ford was constantly discounting Taurus, and for only a few hundred dollars more, you could buy much more car in a Taurus...and Taurus offered an excellent wagon
That was the biggest issue trying to sell a Contour for sure and the reason many dealers wouldn't order a loaded up Tempo/Topaz. The Taurus/Sable which was a much nicer car was only few hundred to a couple of thousand more. Thanks for watching and for your comment.
@@piggy310 There were constant rebate programs and buy downs on interest rates on the entry level cars. Both of those items ate into the profit margin Ford had on these from the factory. They still made money on the Taurus and on the bigger cars Crown Vic and on the trucks so it's not like they were in trouble in the mid to late 80's. They wanted market share dominance to gain to stockholders. They are currently losing money in EV market but once again they want to show a larger market share in what is perceived as an up and coming market by Wall Street.
@@piggy310 I recall a stripper version, the Taurus L....I think it was intended to bait the buyer into better equipped models, but it was well equipped with a 3.0 V6, handsome cloth interior and far more room than a Camry or Accord. Great value
My first car in 92, was an 85 Tempo GL 4dr black exterior and red vinyl interior. It was automatic trans and actually had an airbag for the driver side.
My old 1986 Tempo is sitting junked behind my barn. I got it free and drove it for 2-3 years. It ran okay but was kinda rusty. The muffler fell off. Then I got a 1995 Contour for $500 from my brother-in-law and parked the Tempo and never ran it again. The '95 Contour is still my main car with 180,000 miles on the clock. I don't drive much. It's totally rust free because I learned to squirt drain oil on the undercarriage to prevent rust. Works like a charm. It runs good. Still has the original exhaust and muffler.
I daily drive a 85 ford tempo to work been a great car despite being 40 years old carbureted and over 200k on the clock lmao ya ibeen thro a few ignition modules just keep a few in the glove box easy enough to change
Thank you. Have been a long time AMC and GM guy and h "Hated" Ford's. Your videos, which I have now binged watched 10 of them, gave me a new perspective and appreciation of Ford's. Thank you for these awesome and informative videos.
Glad you like them and thanks so much for watching and for the kind words. I have owned a few AMC's over the years. A Rambler 770 and a couple of Javelin's but that was back in the 90's and they acted as cheap daily drivers for me. I liked those cars however I was always able to turn them for a profit after driving them for a year or so and I did just that. GM products have never been kind to me. The ones I owned, and I have owned several, constantly required me to fix something so I soured on them. That could be just the luck of the draw I guess. The only GM cars that were good to me were the 3 Buick Grand Nationals an 84, 86 & an 87 but those fell into the same category as the AMC's I owned. Drove them for a year or so and got more than I paid for them so I moved on.
I purchased a second hand 1988 Topaz LTS 5-speed MTX, loved it it was comfortable I could shift up into the higher gear for highway cruising, adequate power and got the job done. I purchased it with 62k sold it with 198k. Blue and silver it was nice. Did not like the front wheel steer and it pulled the front end up when you accelerated didn't like that otherwise it was great.
Wife and I bought an '86 Tempo LX demonstrator with 9,000 miles for under $6,500. Car was loaded with every available option for that year. Never had any major issues except it would always stall in reverse and turning the wheel fully right when parallel parking. Had a great sounding high output cassette stereo. Great gas mileage and great in the snow. Only got rid of it in '92 for a '89 Chevy Caprice Estate wagon because of our growing family.
Bought a used '84 Tempo upon returning from overseas duty. That one had intermittent engine troubles I was never able to correct. I did not make enough money to even consider taking it into a dealership for work! Traded it in on a new '88 Tempo in red. That car ended up being fantastic - not a problem one. Thanks for taking me back on a trip in the wayback machine Tony!
Hey Tony, I needed a car in a quick way in 88. I worked for a hotshot delivery company. It was the 1st year of Gen. 2..also a 2 door, so it had the back of Gen 1..Year I had the famous engine cut out, just cruising, and it took them forever to sort it out. 1st they claimed it was the fuel pump. It did it a few days after I picked it up & the service advisor told me the fuel injectors needed cleaning & on & on. I was 21 years old, and really got interested in fixing & figuring out my own problems. When a few years later, I found out this was happening to all the Tempo's, I was pissed. I'd had an Escort b4 I bought that Tempo. After that I bought Toyota's & 1 Honda, and never went back to domestic. BTW, the Escort b4 the Tempo was a pos too! Take care.
Sorry to hear what you went through. It was a bigger issue in warmer climates. It was frustrating for the dealers as well as they didn't know what the issue was either and were just tossing parts in and crossing their fingers. Things have gotten better over the years for the most part but I can understand how you feel.
I continue to enjoy your content very, very much. most of these cars are ones that I have an affinity for. your videos are very well presented. keep up the good work.
The wife and I got a used, white 92 GL 4 door automatic with about 25,000 miles, it was a Hertz rental car. It was comfortable, had power everything and I didn't mind the car except the engine was running 3100 RPM at 65MPH on the interstate. I don't think the engine would have lasted long at 75 or 80MPH. We later traded it for a used 96 Taurus in the gorgeous color Iris Frost. The Taurus was a much better car and much more capable of keeping up with traffic.
I bought new a 1993 Tempo GL with an automatic. I was attracted to the looks and the interior. Initially the engine noise was loud inside the passenger compartment and it took several attempts to fix that. Then my muffler went out at 30,000 miles and I live in Georgia! But the clincher was the warning chimes going off by themselves but only on long interstate trips. They wouldn’t go off until the car rested overnight. Dealer could not replicate so no fix. That’s when I traded it in. I have not gone near Fords since.
I bought a 1991 GL 4-door sedan because I was fed up with the 1983 Chevy Citation I was driving before that (and frankly, two-doors were no longer practical because of a growing family). Drove that car almost a decade--and my daughter drove it another year or two after that...I really got my money's worth out of that Tempo! (I remember seeing an article in the Toronto Star calling the V-6 Tempo "a baby SHO," by the way...)
@@TonysFordsandMustangsmy parents driveway could have passed for a Ford dealership at one point. 2 Tempos, 1 Taurus, and 1 Aerostar. All the 80s/90s boxes checked. My mom insisted on getting a Contour to stay with Fords and hated it. All GM products (Dads choice) from there on until her Fiesta a few years ago. She is past her driving days now.
Thanks for this video. I had an '88 Tempo GLS, that I remember the salesman telling me the GLS trim level was Ford's intention to compete with euro sedans, like the Jetta. I enjoyed that car and I thank you for the nice memory your video has brought me.
I had a brand new 1985 Tempo. Very reliable car, but I had that module you spoke about died on me twice. That 2.3 engine took a beating delivering Domino's Pizza. Car never came close to 34-28 mpg. 18-19 combined best.
Those pizzas had to be on time so I guess 19 combined is about right! Jokes aside those little pushord 4 cyl engines were based on the good old Thriftpower I-6 from the Ford Falcon with 2 cyl chopped off so they were as solid as they could get
Another great clip, thanks again mate! I always found the Ford Tempo and Mercury Topaz to be nicely styled cars, especially the first generations. A shame though that there was never a wagon offered. Here in Australia, Ford Australia had been building Ford Cortina's and then in 1981/82 Ford Australia dropped the Cortina and started producing the Ford Telstar, which like the Ford Laser/Mazda 323 twins at the same time, was a differently styled Mazda 626 in 4dr sedan and 5dr hatch! Later on there was also a Ford Telstar wagon, but that was only available in Japan and New Zealand. Between 1989 and 1992, Ford Australia had also entered into a brief partnership with Nissan Australia, to produce another mid-size car, which was called the Ford Corsair, sold as a 4dr sedan and 5dr hatch. It was a rebadged U12 Nissan Pintara/Bluebird - also sold in the US as the Nissan Stanza. The Corsair and Telstar were sold along side one another, with the Corsair being the entry level midsize car from Ford, as the Telstar was now an import from Japan and more expensive. The Corsair would be dropped in 1992, this was also the year Nissan Australia stopped building vehicles in Australia and became a fully imported brand, the Telstar would be dropped in 1995 and replaced by the first generation Ford Mondeo - imported from Belgium. Fun fact - Australian Ford Cortina wagons were assembled by Renault Australia, as Ford Australia didn't have the capacity to build them.
Thank you for watching. Once we get back into winter here in the states I will digging into more of the Fords of Australia. Appreciate the information!
@@TonysFordsandMustangs That should make for an interesting watch then! No doubt you'll look more into the history of the Falcon in Australia over the years, and all of it's derivatives (Futura/Fairmont/Fairmont Ghia, Fairlane, Fairlane Ghia, LTD, GT, FPV range (Ford Performance Vehicles and Tickford) XR Series - XR6, XR6T (Turbo), XR8, in sedans, wagons, coupes, utes (pickups) and vans! Plus maybe also look at the ill-fated Ford Capri, exported as the Mercury Capri and the hugely popular Falcon based SUV, the Ford Territory. 'XR' was also used a lot in Australia on sporty Fords. We had the Fiesta XR4, Focus XR5T, Mondeo XR5T, Falcon XR6, Falcon XR6T and Falcon XR8. Plus we also had he Capri XR2 convertible.
I'm also looking forward to that video as I am a big fan of the Australian market. The Mercury Capri here in the 90's was Australian built. I always did wonder why, in the 70s and 80s, Ford never just exported the exact same models of the American Fords here (Galaxie 500, LTD, Thunderbird). The same with Chrysler exporting the American Challenger and Charger (instead of the unique smaller versions for Australia). Hey Charger! A popular Australian ad in the 70's. But now I understand that having your own auto industry helped jobs, the economy and of course, there were I believe Tariffs on American cars that would make them too expensive for Australia. Possibly American imposed Tariffs, not really sure at all on that. But it was more expensive for Ford to build here and ship there. Not to mention we must factor in Australian tastes that wanted smaller cars with big V8's despite having large proper roads like in the US. All in all it was delightful and still is to see the Australian market models. Shocking for us in many ways. The film Time Bandits features a huge proper full sized American Galaxie 500 on Aussie shores, so that's' at least one American imported model hehe Might I add, another fascinating story is the story of the Ford Falcon in Argentina which was truly untouched from 1960 until the 1990s! Same body and engine, workhorse and durable, but made more European over time with flush headlights and a Euro Ford Granada type dashboard. Superb! @@iEnofadov
I've had 3 different optioned Tempos. I had a 90 4cyl 5 speed, a 1992 GLS V6 and a 1992 4cyl Auto. and I loved them all but the 5 speed was not surprising the most economical but the GLS...man was amazing.
In 1990 my new wife wanted a new Ford Tempo. So I bought her a brand new blue 4 door. The first summer we took a trip from Washington State to the Penticton British Columbia area. The air conditioning promptly broke while we were driving all around the Penticton area. Later when we got back to Washington State the ignition module went out. It took them a while to figure that one out and our dealer had to replace three different things to get the car to run. One day when the car had 13K miles the serpentine belt broke right while we were driving past the local Ford dealer. Jeez what a joke. Then at about the 15K mark I took it in for an alignment and Les Schwab said it needed some front end parts replaced so they could align it. Later that year at about 18K miles I drove in to town to pick up some groceries for the family and when I reached the city limits the brake pedal went to the floor. I had it towed to the dealer and they said it had catastrophic brake failure. So a bunch of money later we got to drive it again. Oh and by the way the air conditioning broke every single summer but warranty only covered the first summer. So my wife said after four years maybe this Tempo was a lemon just buy me a new one. Stupid me I went and tried to buy her a new one and the dealer wouldn't give me hardly anything on trade for the old Tempo on a brand new one. So I said enough of this and bought her a brand new Accord and never had any further car worries. The Tempo was junk! I bet I lost more than Ford did on my Tempo over the time I owned it.
Wow. You got a bad one. My sister had one, my cousin had one, my Dad had an early one, and a friend had one. They all ran forever with no problems. They weren't particularly attractive nor fun, but as basic transportation they were aces in my book.
Senior year i dated a girl who drove a 92 GLS V6 Tempo. I liked it enough that I went out and bought a 93 Tempo LX V6. I replaced it with an 88 Taurus.
My first ever car, in which I took my driver's license test in 1991, was a black 1985 Tempo with the red stripe in the side. Had it for 3 years, and really miss it now. Loved that car.
My grandma had a 4 door Tempo in a tiny town in South Dakota. All the cousins drove it around town as soon as we were able to reach the pedals and see over the steering wheel. Not enough power to get into any real trouble. Super reliable though.
My first car was a Tempo, I drove it as if it was made of glass cause I had heard it would break easy. The drive shaft popped out once, that was scary! :D
My mother had a 93 Tempo with the optional 3.0 V6. That was a really good car for what it was, and pretty quick too with the V6. It had somewhere north of 140k when she traded it for a Plymouth Breeze in 99 or 2000.
My first (running) car was a 1992 Tempo GL. Couldn't get into too much trouble with the 2.3/3spd auto. Had power locks and mirrors, but crank windows. Mine had the driver's airbag. Downside is that the horn button was the turn signal stalk. Upside is it had conventional seatbelts instead of those godawful electric seat belts. The worst problem it had was a warped harmonic balancer, and the only time it left me stranded was because of corroded battery terminals. 32-oz Coca Cola took out the heater control buttons, and my new CD player. Sprung for the OE cassette tray mounted cup holder after that. After 3 years, I traded it in on a 1999 Jeep Cherokee. Funny thing is the similarities between the two, since their original models were both "class of 84" vehicles.
My ex-g'friend from high school had an '88 4 door dark blue Topaz GS with manual windows and only an am/fm (no cassette player), and my friends' g'friend in college had a 1990 4 door Tempo black! At the time those girls LOVED those cars. I dunno how those stories ended. I know I would Always Smile when my girl picked me up as it was better than taking the bus!!!!!😎😎🤓
I traveled a lot on business during 1986-87 and rented Tempos lot. I didn't like them very much until I rented one with an adjusted steering wheel. Made all the difference in the world! I loved driving that particular car. I'm a bog-standard man of 5'10" and I figure Ford missed badly with ergonomics on the interior.
I never knew there was an all wheel drive version of this vehicle. My high school best friend bought a 2 door 5 speed 1985 Tempo. He never had any issues with it shutting down on him and that car was a little screamer. I was actually surprised how well it ran, I'd almost put it on par with a Cavalier Z/24 in performance. It was a hidden gem in Ford's lineup.
Nice job dude! (thumbs up) Back then I worked at Thrifty Car Rental here in Vegas. They let me take a Topaz home if it was hot because my old Jeep had no AC and they didn't want me sweaty every time I got to work! They were fine cars for the period.
I bought a '89 Topaz XR5 coupe new. It seemed practical and economical. It was woefully underpowered, and the 3 speed automatic made it noisy and buzzy at highway speeds. I traded it off on a new Sable LS within a month and never looked back.
They had a reputation (not a good one) amongst us Gen X'er s. They were known for poor quality control and being absolute turds on the road. The 2.3 was an absolute gutless engine. Contrary to popular belief, it wasn't the 2.3 Lima engine (which would have been a step up), but a shortened Falcon Thriftpower 6 (by two cylinders) that was every bit as cheap as the old Falcon 6, and was a pushrod engine. The engine was because the Lima plant was running at capacity. The chassis was Escort based. It should have been better. We loved the Escort, not so much the Tempo. It was definitely aimed at middle aged people who wanted creature comforts and didn't care about moving down the road in a timely manner.
Was popular older people of the time, who used to get Mavericks and Fairmonts with the old I6. Young kids got them 2nd hand and dumped them as soon as they could.
These were aimed at the "car as an appliance" driver. Someone who wants to get from A to B with minimal drama. Similar to people who buy a Camry or Accord. Toyota and Honda offered more exciting versions, but the vast majority of sales were in the low/mid tier range. Car companies knew they wouldn't make much per vehicle, they just planned to sell a lot of them. Ford and GM helped boost their sales numbers through fleet sales. The Tempo/Topaz twins were all over rental lots.
The 1st car I have a recollection of was a 1986 Tempo GL Sport 2dr my parents bought when I was a 2yr old. It was a 5 spd, two tone gray coupe that proved very reliable. It took my family to many trips over the 6 years my dad owned it and it outlasted my mom's Town & Country Wagon and its replacement a Subaru GL Wagon. My dad would even let me tilt the wheel when parking in the garage. Having spent most of my childhood in that car would teach me how to say my 1st car word at the age of 3: Ford
I had an 86 topaz GL and it was loaded with every option you could imagine very plush interior. It got great fuel knowledge. Never had any problems with the motor. But eventually I got rid of it. Because little things started to go wrong and I didn't have the money to fix them.
9:32 and 9:34 In one the oddest design decisions that always stumped me, 88 the coupe was still the 84 model body design while the sedan was truly a completely different design. Even the doors were different, not just simple grill and roof treatment. There was a reasoning for this that I read in the past but cannot remember. Does anyone know the reason?
I believe they were looking to improve head room for the back seat so they hid the C pillar and made it more vertical. That's a guess. perhaps someone else can chime in. Thanks for watching!
Ford likely sold far more sedans than coupes due to the difficulty of getting into the rear seats in two door cars. The higher sales of sedans easily justifies spending more development money on these. This also easily explains why nearly truck, crossover and SUV has four doors. Look at traffic in your area and see how many four door vehicles are out there vs. two.
@@houseofno Unfortunately that explanation doesn't fly. Obviously 4 doors cars sell better even since the 1960's. Monte Carlo, Grand Prix and Cordoba personal luxury coupes had their era of high sales in the 70s but even then, when a body was changed, it was for BOTH the coupe and sedan because of the tooling. It's more expensive to keep an old coupe (as was this Tempo) on a SEPARATE assembly line, so this was NOT at all common for any automaker to do. Of course 4 door cars sell more than coupes but there's a reason Ford did it, but it's not that.
I remember seeing Tempos and Topazes all over the place when I was a kid in the 80s and 90s. They became a rare sight after the turn of the century.
As a kid of the 80s, I can confirm that these were everywhere back then. Very popular.
For sure. I was born in 83 so I remember these being everywhere as well. I always got the impression that they were better than the J-Cars from GM, but my parents were Ford people.
They were everywhere in the 90a also
My family collectively drove a '93 Tempo 2.3L 2-door for 22 years. The ONLY problems we ever had with it were the harmonic balancer and heater core. That's it. I may be a Toyota guy but that Tempo was a damn fine, reliable car.
Thanks for sharing your experience!
If the car rode a little lower and had a little bigger wheels and tires, it would have been far more aesthetically pleasing. It had the lines right
metal knobs to open doors
My grandmother had a loaded 88 tempo that she brought in 89 as a returned lease from Hertz rental. Had under 20k miles when she bought it and was a fantastic car for the next decade. I still remember the comfy burgundy valour seats!
Thanks for sharing!
Currently driving a 1996 Mercury Mystique 2.0 5-speed with over 300k miles on it. Drives like new, doesn't burn any oil! Really fun to drive, 32mpg all day long :)
Very nice! Thanks for sharing your story!
Those were good handling cars.
I drove an '86 Tempo in high school. My dad bought a '90 Tempo and I remember it being the only car I'd ever driven that had the automatic shoulder belts. So glad that feature didn't last long.
Thanks for watching! Those seat belts went away because of airbags. Manufactures had to have one or the other.
I called them The Hang ‘Em High seatbelts (when they malfunctioned).
I had to have my drivers' side motorized belt fixed in my 1991 Escort at a dealership. I Don't remember how much it cost but it wasn't exactly cheap.😝
@@landonbenford8369 I'm sure it was cheaper than an airbag. At least back then. That's why Ford had them.
I liked the auto belt. Dnt need to put the lap one
My wife and I tested a Tempo in 1989. Then we drove a Probe, based on the Mazda 626. Man, the contrast was night and day -- the Probe was so much smoother riding and more responsive. We bought the Probe.
U made a very wise decision I bought my used ford probe in 2000 for $700 its now got about 240k miles on it and still runs great. I have never had to do major repairs on it.
A horrible name for a car.
The Mazda 626 was a very good vehicle.
yeah but the tempo has better back seats...
@@JulezWinnfield I'd put some of those green alien head stickers on it.
I had two Ford Tempos and 1 Mercury Topaz. Even on the used car market back then those two were a lot of car for the money. The one I fondest of was a 1986 Tempo GL coupe. This one was a special order,as it was equipped with the 2.3 liter HSO(High Specific Output) version of the HSC engine. And as a bonus,it was equipped with the 5-speed manual transmission. It had the "two tone" paint scheme (red on top,with gray on the lower body and bumpers) and it had the trunk mounted luggage rack. That car was A LOT of fun to drive, something that couldn't be said often of Fords from that era. I still miss it.
@@marquesdean5075 thanks for watching and for your comment.
7:10. The commercial was filmed in Ontario, Canada, on the Canadian Pacific Railway's Owen Sound branch. The scenic hairpin turn at 7:20 is on the Forks of the Credit [River] Road between Brampton and Orangeville. The CP Rail locomotive is pulling Toronto GO Transit single-level commuter cars of the period.
Awesome thanks for sharing that information.
Yea soon to be a bike trail now since it’s completely abandoned now
Tempo was never sold in Chile. There was one red 1985 = was already fuel injected? .
My '91 Escort 40 MPG but had as much HP as a moped. My Tempo, had a blue two door that looked great. But was a tractor with the shell of a car. LOL In the Ad they show the Tempo passing a semi, yeah only downhill and a tail wind!! I never had too many problems with mine ,mechanically. But both cars were like driving a lawnmower or a tractor. Very crude machines. I bought my '91 Escort new with air conditioning it came to $7,000. I skipped the power window option. lol
As a teenager in the 80s, I always preferred the styling of the Mercurys over the Fords. No Idea why. Just did.
They were more luxurious.
We owned 3 Ford Tempos and 3 Mercury Topazes. Ranging from a 1984 Tempo that we paid $110.00 for it to a 1991 Mercury Topaz. The most we ever paid was $600.00 for a fully loaded 1986 Mercury Topaz LS, which of course was the fancy model. Everyone of them were good cars.
The Honda Dealer had a Pubic Auction for Trade ins during the 1990's and a Tempo went for $25 and no auction fees, I bought a 87 T- Bird with the 5.0 EFI Engine for $450 and it was a great Car .
My wife and I inherited a Toespaz (as I liked to call it) from her dad. I think it was a '92. It wasn't sporty. It wasn't fast. It wasn't in any way cool, but it had a spoiler on the back and it certainly served its purpose. It was quite comfortable and fairly easy to work on. I repaired and refreshed a few things myself and had a bit of suspension / alignment work done. In the late summer of 2006 after I had just retired from teaching, we drove it from Vancouver, B.C. through Yellowstone and on to New York, Connecticut, Maine, through Vermont and into Sherbrooke, Quebec where our lad was attending university. We stayed in and explored the area for few days while we also transferred ownership of the car to him. We had him drive us to the airport and bade the car adieu. He used it for the next 2 years by which time its time had come. Good times. Thanks for reminding me of that wonderful road trip made possible by that good old toespaz.
Thank you for sharing your personal experience and for watching my video. It is appreciated
My older Brother had a Tempo in Highschool i loved it.
I had 2 1988 Mercury Xr5's. Both Black/Grey with 5sp sticks! Loved both of them. Also had a Contour SE 24v V6 5spd and 3 SVT 5spds. Great lil cars!
Thanks for sharing!
I had an 88 Ford Tempo 5speed. It was one of the best cars I've ever owned. Not the nicest or most luxurious, nor the fastest. Yet it always started, was fun to drive & I put a nice stereo in it. The only thing I ever had to put into it was a new clutch. Eventually the body rusted out due to all the winter salt they put out here in Ontario winter's. Modern cars are too complicated.
Thanks for sharing your story!
I bought the Tempo GL manual in '87. Put 225k miles on it before it was totaled while parked on the street. Original clutch and never had an engine issue. My model appears @6:57. ❤
Thanks for for watching and for sharing!
Listen, I'm, glad someone did this, and SO well. Wow. I'm probably the only American that's still craving a Ford Tempo as I actually was in the dealership as a kid when it was new in late 83. I thought it was the most modern looking regular car I had ever seen. I was IN the dealer lot, and sat in one with red interiors and it felt like a spaceship. The red swallowed you up. It had a little drawing of a car down low in the center console that notified you of doors, trunk, etc. being open. Coolest thing ever and as a kid I had to have that. Then I sat in a white one with blue interior and was immediately stunned at how a simple interior color change can change your entire mood when you entered the car. I was hooked. My father never did get to buy one but the longing for one is still in my blood. Revolutionary car and excellent video with factual information all around.
Thank you very much for the kind words. It is very much appreciated!
I have a 1986 Tempo you can have for free. It still ran when I parked it in 2003. All four tires are flat however. 😅
We need more people like you. Especially where I live. Running or not, you're doing God's work my son lol @@browngreen933
We had a 1985 Tempo, 4 cylinder 5 speed. It was a great car, lasted a long time, held up with no repairs, just tires, brakes, a battery and oil changes. Great mileage on my work commute and on vacations. The trunk held a lot more than other small cars. I would buy another one, I sure am not going to buy a battery powered car.
Thanks for sharing!
...bought a '88 Merc..loved that car..2 door..fun to drive..
Tempo sure did deliver on value for the dollar. My mom had an 89 and i owned four of them over the years. The automatic transmission one’s ate tie rod ends and muffler systems at an above average rate. But neither of those parts were actually expensive. The air conditioning was super powerful and the fuel injected ones gave adequate performance. Overall I cannot say that I had any serious issues with any of them. I did my own maintenance and oil changes, they were easy to service and the diesel version was phenomenal on fuel if you were willing to live with the slow acceleration in city driving. On the freeway the diesel was great. Many people hated them, but I think they were very good and enjoyed my experience with them.
Thank you for watching and sharing your experience!
I bought an '86 Tempo GL 5-speed to replace my VW Bug when its engine let go. It had about 70k miles on it when I bought it; I kept it going for another 125k. Decent car, but its front end got chewed up by Denver's pothole-laden streets. I replaced the tie rod ends twice on it. But other than a leaking power steering pump, it still ran pretty strong when I sold it.
I had 2. An 84 5spd loaded with every option including premium sound and flip up sunroof. One of my favorite cars I have ever owned. The carburetor sucked.
The 93 was V6 and way faster than it should have been. Unfortunately the V6 was automatic. But the most comfortable seats I have ever sat in.
My mother had several of these and I had one myself, a 2 door Topaz with the flush lights and a 5-sp. I had good memories of them.
Had a 85 sport gl 5 speed. First new car we ever bought. I got 38 mpg on a highway trip. Averaged 31 mpg. Fought distributor issues and inner tie rod ends later on before selling.
As I am watching this I am following you word by word with Wikipedia !
These GD RUclips videos rarely have so much as an ounce of originality, from regurgitated copy cat DIY projects to plagiarism like this one.
Lmao, now you mention it, I just checked too & you're right! Just mix a few words around... This would not pass any plagiarism checks. Laughing here in Australia! =)
I bought a brand new Tempo L (base model) in 1986 immediately after graduating college. It provided solid dependable transportation for years. I sold it to a neighbors high school kid in 1999 for $200. That was a great car for the money.
Thanks for sharing!
My dad had a 84 tempo with a manual transmission. Compared to my mom's 84 escort station wagon it was a rocket ship. I still remember going to Zarowni Motors to pick both cars up with my dad.They finally ended up selling both those cars in 2000. I can't believe i sat in those cars from elementary school all the way until i was finished with my studies
My parents had 2 Ford Tempo's - a base 1986 GL and a loaded '87 GL Sport. Both cars had the 5-speed manual. My siblings and I all learned to drive on those cars. No problems with either car in the 5 years or so my family owned them.
Thanks for watching and for sharing your experience!
I just stopped driving one of these things. 1983 ford Tempo with the 2.3 - 4 cylinder could do 0 - 60 in 8 seconds. I kid you not. Best beater I ever drove. Raced everyone with that thing. Absolute beast in the winter. Got it given to me and drove it for like 3 years until the transmission failed from me stepping on it. It died last year.
Was going to take it to the drag strip for confirmation on how fast it was. I was beating 4x4 trucks in the winter. Absolutely trashing some low power 4x4's with a ford tempo. Carb even.
Best beater I ever drove.
Lol dude, as George Carlin would say, you're almost literally exploding with BS! There just plain ain't no way a 40 year old 2.3 tempo did 0-60 in 8 seconds, no specs I can find anywhere say it could go that fast even when it was brand new. Quit making stuff up to try and sound cool, we can all see right through it
@@Atari2600Gamer
Meh. I had one. It had the 2.3 ohc. Carb engine. Power locks, with air and cruise.
That first gear would hold on until the cows came home. It was awesome. I could not believe it. In winter it was a beast. Like it was awesome in the snow. Both wheels just went for it. Great traction and it was light as hell. 13 inch wheels so I guess it had more torque cause they be smaller.
I found some other people online who had one like mine. They had some stories. Did not take me long to find them.
I will say that most don't know that carb is very finicky in those cars. There is a vacum part that fails and will cause the engine to get too much gas thereby causing it to lose power and smell. lolz! A freaking 7 dollar part and it was FIXED.
So many of these cars be running around smelling with lost power. Crazy man!
@@macsvoltage5723 Sounds more like you have a REALLY optimistic sense of time and speed lmao. It might've been light, but it wasn't exactly a powerhouse either. If it was really that fast, how come nobody talks about it?
@@Atari2600GamerFord had great engineers back in the day and Ford's motto back then was TORQUE TORQUE TORQUE so I would not be surprised to hear stories of these little TORQUE MONSTERS!
@@Atari2600Gamer
You know, I don't care what you think. You have no idea how much fun that car was and no one cares if you don't believe.
It was the best beater I ever drove. The owner is a friend of mine and it was his first car ever. Then his mother bought it off him and drove it to work for like 20 years. I got it with less than 70 thousand clicks on the speedo.
The car did not run great until the carb was fixed. After that was when I found out it had POWER. My buddy said it went like snot when it ran good but could never get it running great all the time. It always smelled when starting the thing cause it was flooding. This was COMMON for these cars and it was just the vacume thingy for the carb that failed. 7 dollar part and it was fixed.
If anyone has one of these cars with the carb, you probably need to change that part. After that, the engine woke up and had the power. No more smell when starting and the first gear holds until like 60 km/hr or something crazy like that.
I beat so many cars in my town. That white Tempo had a reputation.
A few people tired to run me off the road cause they be beat fair and square during the winter. lolz!
My first car was a red 5spd Tempo coupe so I've always had a bit of a soft spot for these. I have no complaints about it either then or now! I do feel it was kinda let down by its dinosaur HSC motor & pushrod non-crossflow head which was already fairly obsolete long before 1984. But a good reliable torquey one nevertheless. People loved to hate on Tempos and Topazes but the tuth is they were actually really good cars.. And you could have driven other more expensive economy cars on the market at the time that were SSOOOOOO MUCH WORSE TO DRIVE in every conceivable way back then! (ahem cough cough like literally *any* dodge K car derivative ever produced 🤢🤮)
Hey, it's my first car! I had a 91 Topaz GS, it wasn't stellar, but it was mine. Looking back, it wasn't the greatest car, but for its time, it was economical. Cash for Clunkers destroyed these time capsules
@BSFJeebus Cash for Clunkers was designed to jump start the domestic auto industry.
@@gregoryhainsworth2663 no shit, it still destroyed a lot of good cars needlessly.
I hate cash for clunkers, but the combined fuel economy of the Topaz was way above 19 mpg, the cutoff of the program.
Had a New 86 Tempo manual and rally liked it . Traded it around 70 K with no problems. Auto transmissions were a different story - DOGS. Lucky to get 60 K on an Auto without a replaced Trans.
Great video! My college car in the 90's was a 1989 Mercury Topaz LTS. Car was actually pretty reliable and surprisingly good in the snow with proper snow tires.
Thanks for sharing!
V6 5-speed stick shift Tempo/Topaz were very fast for the day..... the Diesel Tempo/Topaz could get a real world 43 mpg all day long, no power, but all the cars were slow back then, so it wasn't a big deal....
I had a 1984 Mercury Topaz for a company car, a 2 door, with a manual transmission and the fancy Michelin tires and rims. It wasn't a great engine for a manual and felt like a truck when it revved, but it was ok. The one I had was a grey color at 3:00 into the video.
Test drove a diesel one in Jacksonville Fla. Never seem another one since. Drove great kind of wish i would have got it.
My first car was a 86 Tempo I got it in 1994. Few years later I got a 1992 Mercury Topaz XR5 V6 5 speed 2 door. XR5 V6 only made in 92. Very rare and I never saw another one on the road. It was a fun car.
That V6 Tempo and Topaz is an overlooked car. It may have been the best one Ford made during the entire run.
That v6 was the same( Vulcan) as in the Taurus and Sable. I still have a 04 Taurus with the same Vulcan v6. Those are great engines.
I never saw a manual V6 tempo or topaz IRL. That was a very good find. I've heard a few people call the 5 speed manual tempo the baby SHO because it was actually more fun to drive than it should have been.
October 1984 my family's lumber company purchased 3 Tempos to replace 3 Fairmonts. Two were used by outside salesmen, one was kept at the office for people to run errands. They were durable and reliable cars, accelerated way better than the 6 cylinder Fairmonts they replaced, and when you put snow tires in them, they could go until snow packed up under the belly. By 1986, my father was so impressed with them he got my sister a Tempo Sport (2 door) to drive to HS then college. Last Tempo I saw driving daily was my exbrother inlaws Deisel Tempo he got when a customer dropped it off at his shop and abandoned it. Tattered seats, failed paint, but the engine and transmission had never needed major repairs and it had 380K on the odometer. Barry named the car Los Tempos and his brother Chris drove it most of the time. As Barry once said, Chris could be given an anvil for Christmas and my New Years it would be broken. Well Chris met his match with Los Tempos - Chris passed away and the car was still going.
Sure wish Ford built such durability and reliability today.
Thank you for watching and for sharing your experience.
The 2nd generation Tempo/Topaz were good cars.
What second generation?!
My parents owned a 1992 Red Tempo 4 door. By the late '90s with 120k miles on it the 4cyl engine was worn out. We lived in WNY so it had to always go up hills. They bought it used from Hertz when rental car companies sold their cars off with about 36k on the odometer.
I had to replace the head gasket on my employer's carbureted Tempo with the 2.3L years ago; it was my first experience with torque-to-yield head bolts. A broken bolt caused the gasket to fail, but I lapped the head flat on a piece of plate glass with valve-grinding compound and installed new bolts to spec. Must not have screwed up too bad as the car ran good as new until it was traded...
Learned how to drive on an 88' Ford Tempo..also an 88' Mercury Sable...cars my parents had in the 90s.
I owned 2 , one was a tempo & other was a topaz .The tempo was a daily driver , and topaz was a fix & flip car . I enjoyed both of them , always started & super easy to repair . Both of them had almost 200,000 when they were sold .
Thanks for sharing
The rush of power from the Vulcan V6 option was hardly felt, because V6's also got a numerically lower final drive ratio to keep fuel economy up. It did make highway speeds feel less fatiguing though (2000 rpm purr instead of nearly 3000 rpm roar).
I was working for Ford at the time. I took a brand new Tempo off the truck and floored it on a road test. The vehicle tried to dive into the ditch.
I then immediately let off the gas pedal, and it tried to swerve back to the left. Torque steer light crazy, handling like garbage.
And to think Ford sold them for 11 years...
I worked for Ford Motor Company back in the early 80's. Tempo/Topaz had so many driveability issues that Ford published a bound book of Technical Service Bulletins just on their driveability issues. Most got remedied with EFI.
Stumbled on this and love the Ford's through the 90's. Thanks for this great vid.
I have always considered these personal transportation options for people who didn't like cars or non-enthusiasts that didn't want to take the bus, ride a bicycle or walk. Another more practical reason for producing these plain vanilla boxes was CAFE, the Corporate Average Fuel Economy law enacted in 1978 and put into effect for the 1980 model year requiring all carmakers in the USA to meet a minimum average fuel economy across their entire fleet. Sell more fuel efficient cars, your average goes up. Sell more gas guzzlers, your average goes down. Carmakers were docked penalties for missing CAFE targets across their fleet. The law applied to non-commercial passenger cars under 8,500 pounds in curb weight. Ford could theoretically take financial losses on each car if they sold enough of them to dodge being penalized for missing the CAFE targets. Just another possibility I would put out there.
All of this true. What didn't I mention the Ford Finance, parts sales, and extended warranties all helped Ford produce a profit even if they lost a bit on the car sale itself.
Dad bought an 86 Tempo. The thing was a constant headache for him. Warped brake rotors, bent door hinges, rusted door panels, and a litany of other issues. It was always in the shop for major repairs - thankfully, always on Ford’s dime.
Dad owned other Fords that had no issues. The Tempo was not one of them.
These cars especially last generation were so well styled. Just a simple and attractive car design that aged pretty well in my opinion. I had a 92 Tempo coupe for a brief period of time in the 2010s. It was very dilapidated but I learned a lot about engines working on that car.
Great video again. These were such mundane vehicles back in the 80s. I was of driving age in 1985/6 and dad was quite loyal to fords and mercury's. I fell in love with the escort along that time and eventually buying a 90 gt. I couldn't help but quietly cheer these cars on as a ford enthusiasts at the time. Watching their evolution was satisfying and somewhat exciting with the v6 models. The only sad thing about these in my opinion is they were to closely engineered with the escort/lynx and therefore they weren't much roomier for being a larger vehicle. I also believe the forthcoming contour didnt puck up where the tempo left off but rather reset that model spot until later in its model life. Thanks for another informative video and a trip down memory lane.
Thank you John for watching and for the kind words.
The sales continued to dwindle throughout the 80s and early 90s even with refreshes and redesigns. More and more people were going to Toyota, Honda, Subaru, Mazda and (even Nissan). Even Mitsubishi used be popular back then. American brands were selling to the same customers every few years and that’s how they got by. The Japanese, especially Honda and Toyota, where taking customers from American brands which is how they’ve managed to gain so much market share in the US. By word of mouth, people knew how much more reliable and fun Japanese cars had become.
Now, idiot Americans wonder where all of the middle class manufacturing has gone. All foreign car manufacturing is non-union, genius. The Tempo was an extremely reliable car.
Your exactly right. I worked as a Chrysler tech in the 90s and watched it continue. Chrysler was king of the Mini Van sales that kept that corp flush with cash. By the early 2000s sales were falling to Toyota and Honda which took over and now dominate the mini van market.
Agree about Toyota and Honda. But Nissan was a much bigger player back then than Honda which was often named the littlest of the Japanese 3.
But Subaru, Mazda were not popular. If you ask their CEOs they would rather keep the popularity they have today with a much bigger lineup than they did back in the 80s and they're arguably more reliable now than back then.
The D3 never excelled marketing nor building a compact sedan, they didn't listened despite owning shares and forming joint ventures with Japanese automakers.
@@engineer_alvyes because amongst other reasons Gm and Ford have partnered with other brands. You may be thinking about the last few years but there were times that the Focus and Cruze have been extremely popular
@@jamesmedina2062 and now they're gone. The Focus was solid from 2005 to 2011 when they went all in with Duratec engines and regular automatics and pretty much all manual ones were good. And they were the best selling compact for a couple years.
The Cruze sold well at the beginning but had problems before they switched to the LE2 engine in 2016. And in typical GM fashion once they made a solid car they chose to discontinue it
The SalesMen & Mechanics at the Ford dealer I was a service Porter at in my Senior year of H.S. Would refer to the Tempo & Topaz as baby Sable&Taurus when they wanted me to go out back & bring one in for new car delivery prep
My father bought a 1984 topaz [4cyl] and my mother got a 1986.[4cyl] Both junk! the 84' was worse. It had a troublesome carburetor. Transmission failed at 40k miles. 3 speed automatics [but you could get a manual] 15 mpg,and the engine was screaming a 65 mph. Mufflers rusted out at 20 k miles. I could go on and on and on.......
I recall these well...the main problem with both these and the following Contour, was that Ford was constantly discounting Taurus, and for only a few hundred dollars more, you could buy much more car in a Taurus...and Taurus offered an excellent wagon
That was the biggest issue trying to sell a Contour for sure and the reason many dealers wouldn't order a loaded up Tempo/Topaz. The Taurus/Sable which was a much nicer car was only few hundred to a couple of thousand more. Thanks for watching and for your comment.
Ford was discounting Taurus in the 80s when they were extremely popular?
@@piggy310 There were constant rebate programs and buy downs on interest rates on the entry level cars. Both of those items ate into the profit margin Ford had on these from the factory. They still made money on the Taurus and on the bigger cars Crown Vic and on the trucks so it's not like they were in trouble in the mid to late 80's. They wanted market share dominance to gain to stockholders. They are currently losing money in EV market but once again they want to show a larger market share in what is perceived as an up and coming market by Wall Street.
@@piggy310 I recall a stripper version, the Taurus L....I think it was intended to bait the buyer into better equipped models, but it was well equipped with a 3.0 V6, handsome cloth interior and far more room than a Camry or Accord. Great value
@@jimeditorial there was a base model 4 cylinder stick shift I believe although I never seen one in the wild but I was about 5 when these came out!
My first car in 92, was an 85 Tempo GL 4dr black exterior and red vinyl interior. It was automatic trans and actually had an airbag for the driver side.
My old 1986 Tempo is sitting junked behind my barn. I got it free and drove it for 2-3 years. It ran okay but was kinda rusty. The muffler fell off. Then I got a 1995 Contour for $500 from my brother-in-law and parked the Tempo and never ran it again. The '95 Contour is still my main car with 180,000 miles on the clock. I don't drive much. It's totally rust free because I learned to squirt drain oil on the undercarriage to prevent rust. Works like a charm. It runs good. Still has the original exhaust and muffler.
Does nobody live in authoritarian areas where Democrats require "Inspections"?
My pop gave me his 93 Topaz. Drove it for a couple of years. In the same week the rack & pinion and the engine died.
Wow what a blast from the past! My dad had an 84 Tempo manual transmission. That’s what I learned to drive on! Thanks for a great video!
Thank you for the kind words and for watching!
I daily drive a 85 ford tempo to work been a great car despite being 40 years old carbureted and over 200k on the clock lmao ya ibeen thro a few ignition modules just keep a few in the glove box easy enough to change
Thanks for sharing your experience!
88 Tempo coupe 5 Speed was the best car I ever owned.
Thank you. Have been a long time AMC and GM guy and h
"Hated" Ford's. Your videos, which I have now binged watched 10 of them, gave me a new perspective and appreciation of Ford's. Thank you for these awesome and informative videos.
Glad you like them and thanks so much for watching and for the kind words. I have owned a few AMC's over the years. A Rambler 770 and a couple of Javelin's but that was back in the 90's and they acted as cheap daily drivers for me. I liked those cars however I was always able to turn them for a profit after driving them for a year or so and I did just that. GM products have never been kind to me. The ones I owned, and I have owned several, constantly required me to fix something so I soured on them. That could be just the luck of the draw I guess. The only GM cars that were good to me were the 3 Buick Grand Nationals an 84, 86 & an 87 but those fell into the same category as the AMC's I owned. Drove them for a year or so and got more than I paid for them so I moved on.
I purchased a second hand 1988 Topaz LTS 5-speed MTX, loved it it was comfortable I could shift up into the higher gear for highway cruising, adequate power and got the job done. I purchased it with 62k sold it with 198k. Blue and silver it was nice. Did not like the front wheel steer and it pulled the front end up when you accelerated didn't like that otherwise it was great.
Thanks for sharing!
Wife and I bought an '86 Tempo LX demonstrator with 9,000 miles for under $6,500. Car was loaded with every available option for that year. Never had any major issues except it would always stall in reverse and turning the wheel fully right when parallel parking. Had a great sounding high output cassette stereo. Great gas mileage and great in the snow. Only got rid of it in '92 for a '89 Chevy Caprice Estate wagon because of our growing family.
Bought a used '84 Tempo upon returning from overseas duty. That one had intermittent engine troubles I was never able to correct. I did not make enough money to even consider taking it into a dealership for work! Traded it in on a new '88 Tempo in red. That car ended up being fantastic - not a problem one. Thanks for taking me back on a trip in the wayback machine Tony!
Thank you for watching! It is appreciated
Hey Tony, I needed a car in a quick way in 88. I worked for a hotshot delivery company. It was the 1st year of Gen. 2..also a 2 door, so it had the back of Gen 1..Year I had the famous engine cut out, just cruising, and it took them forever to sort it out. 1st they claimed it was the fuel pump. It did it a few days after I picked it up & the service advisor told me the fuel injectors needed cleaning & on & on. I was 21 years old, and really got interested in fixing & figuring out my own problems. When a few years later, I found out this was happening to all the Tempo's, I was pissed. I'd had an Escort b4 I bought that Tempo. After that I bought Toyota's & 1 Honda, and never went back to domestic. BTW, the Escort b4 the Tempo was a pos too! Take care.
Sorry to hear what you went through. It was a bigger issue in warmer climates. It was frustrating for the dealers as well as they didn't know what the issue was either and were just tossing parts in and crossing their fingers. Things have gotten better over the years for the most part but I can understand how you feel.
I had a 1981 Escort. Even with the four speed it was gutless. Not a very good car.
I sold a lot of them back in the day.Made a nice runner with the V6 engine.
I continue to enjoy your content very, very much. most of these cars are ones that I have an affinity for. your videos are very well presented. keep up the good work.
Glad you like them, thanks for watching!
The wife and I got a used, white 92 GL 4 door automatic with about 25,000 miles, it was a Hertz rental car. It was comfortable, had power everything and I didn't mind the car except the engine was running 3100 RPM at 65MPH on the interstate. I don't think the engine would have lasted long at 75 or 80MPH. We later traded it for a used 96 Taurus in the gorgeous color Iris Frost. The Taurus was a much better car and much more capable of keeping up with traffic.
Wow!!! My first car, 1985 Tempo White 2 door G 5 speed manual
Very cool!
Right on, the manuals were much better than the three speed slush box auto. I had the 88 LTS 5 speed.
I bought new a 1993 Tempo GL with an automatic. I was attracted to the looks and the interior. Initially the engine noise was loud inside the passenger compartment and it took several attempts to fix that. Then my muffler went out at 30,000 miles and I live in Georgia! But the clincher was the warning chimes going off by themselves but only on long interstate trips. They wouldn’t go off until the car rested overnight. Dealer could not replicate so no fix. That’s when I traded it in. I have not gone near Fords since.
We had a Tempo as a rental on a 3 week family holiday in Florida in the 80s. Really liked it.
Very cool!
My dad bought one in 1988 he got almost 700 thousand k on it before it finally gave out was a good car why can’t they make them like that anymore
I bought a 1991 GL 4-door sedan because I was fed up with the 1983 Chevy Citation I was driving before that (and frankly, two-doors were no longer practical because of a growing family). Drove that car almost a decade--and my daughter drove it another year or two after that...I really got my money's worth out of that Tempo! (I remember seeing an article in the Toronto Star calling the V-6 Tempo "a baby SHO," by the way...)
Thanks for sharing!
My parents had 2 consecutively. We actually ran across the first one several years after we sold it. Still running fine.
Outstanding!
@@TonysFordsandMustangsmy parents driveway could have passed for a Ford dealership at one point. 2 Tempos, 1 Taurus, and 1 Aerostar. All the 80s/90s boxes checked. My mom insisted on getting a Contour to stay with Fords and hated it. All GM products (Dads choice) from there on until her Fiesta a few years ago. She is past her driving days now.
Thanks for this video. I had an '88 Tempo GLS, that I remember the salesman telling me the GLS trim level was Ford's intention to compete with euro sedans, like the Jetta. I enjoyed that car and I thank you for the nice memory your video has brought me.
Thank you for your comment and for watching. I'm glad you enjoyed the video!
I had a brand new 1985 Tempo. Very reliable car, but I had that module you spoke about died on me twice. That 2.3 engine took a beating delivering Domino's Pizza. Car never came close to 34-28 mpg. 18-19 combined best.
Those pizzas had to be on time so I guess 19 combined is about right!
Jokes aside those little pushord 4 cyl engines were based on the good old Thriftpower I-6 from the Ford Falcon with 2 cyl chopped off so they were as solid as they could get
Another great clip, thanks again mate! I always found the Ford Tempo and Mercury Topaz to be nicely styled cars, especially the first generations. A shame though that there was never a wagon offered.
Here in Australia, Ford Australia had been building Ford Cortina's and then in 1981/82 Ford Australia dropped the Cortina and started producing the Ford Telstar, which like the Ford Laser/Mazda 323 twins at the same time, was a differently styled Mazda 626 in 4dr sedan and 5dr hatch! Later on there was also a Ford Telstar wagon, but that was only available in Japan and New Zealand.
Between 1989 and 1992, Ford Australia had also entered into a brief partnership with Nissan Australia, to produce another mid-size car, which was called the Ford Corsair, sold as a 4dr sedan and 5dr hatch. It was a rebadged U12 Nissan Pintara/Bluebird - also sold in the US as the Nissan Stanza. The Corsair and Telstar were sold along side one another, with the Corsair being the entry level midsize car from Ford, as the Telstar was now an import from Japan and more expensive. The Corsair would be dropped in 1992, this was also the year Nissan Australia stopped building vehicles in Australia and became a fully imported brand, the Telstar would be dropped in 1995 and replaced by the first generation Ford Mondeo - imported from Belgium.
Fun fact - Australian Ford Cortina wagons were assembled by Renault Australia, as Ford Australia didn't have the capacity to build them.
Thank you for watching. Once we get back into winter here in the states I will digging into more of the Fords of Australia. Appreciate the information!
@@TonysFordsandMustangs That should make for an interesting watch then! No doubt you'll look more into the history of the Falcon in Australia over the years, and all of it's derivatives (Futura/Fairmont/Fairmont Ghia, Fairlane, Fairlane Ghia, LTD, GT, FPV range (Ford Performance Vehicles and Tickford) XR Series - XR6, XR6T (Turbo), XR8, in sedans, wagons, coupes, utes (pickups) and vans!
Plus maybe also look at the ill-fated Ford Capri, exported as the Mercury Capri and the hugely popular Falcon based SUV, the Ford Territory.
'XR' was also used a lot in Australia on sporty Fords. We had the Fiesta XR4, Focus XR5T, Mondeo XR5T, Falcon XR6, Falcon XR6T and Falcon XR8. Plus we also had he Capri XR2 convertible.
I'm also looking forward to that video as I am a big fan of the Australian market. The Mercury Capri here in the 90's was Australian built. I always did wonder why, in the 70s and 80s, Ford never just exported the exact same models of the American Fords here (Galaxie 500, LTD, Thunderbird). The same with Chrysler exporting the American Challenger and Charger (instead of the unique smaller versions for Australia). Hey Charger! A popular Australian ad in the 70's. But now I understand that having your own auto industry helped jobs, the economy and of course, there were I believe Tariffs on American cars that would make them too expensive for Australia. Possibly American imposed Tariffs, not really sure at all on that. But it was more expensive for Ford to build here and ship there. Not to mention we must factor in Australian tastes that wanted smaller cars with big V8's despite having large proper roads like in the US. All in all it was delightful and still is to see the Australian market models. Shocking for us in many ways. The film Time Bandits features a huge proper full sized American Galaxie 500 on Aussie shores, so that's' at least one American imported model hehe
Might I add, another fascinating story is the story of the Ford Falcon in Argentina which was truly untouched from 1960 until the 1990s! Same body and engine, workhorse and durable, but made more European over time with flush headlights and a Euro Ford Granada type dashboard. Superb! @@iEnofadov
The other reason Ford built these "loss leaders" is they needed the EPA mileage credits to build the vehicles people actually wanted to buy.
That's the story of all domestic smaller cars from the beginning of time
I've had 3 different optioned Tempos. I had a 90 4cyl 5 speed, a 1992 GLS V6 and a 1992 4cyl Auto. and I loved them all but the 5 speed was not surprising the most economical but the GLS...man was amazing.
In 1990 my new wife wanted a new Ford Tempo. So I bought her a brand new blue 4 door. The first summer we took a trip from Washington State to the Penticton British Columbia area. The air conditioning promptly broke while we were driving all around the Penticton area. Later when we got back to Washington State the ignition module went out. It took them a while to figure that one out and our dealer had to replace three different things to get the car to run. One day when the car had 13K miles the serpentine belt broke right while we were driving past the local Ford dealer. Jeez what a joke. Then at about the 15K mark I took it in for an alignment and Les Schwab said it needed some front end parts replaced so they could align it. Later that year at about 18K miles I drove in to town to pick up some groceries for the family and when I reached the city limits the brake pedal went to the floor. I had it towed to the dealer and they said it had catastrophic brake failure. So a bunch of money later we got to drive it again. Oh and by the way the air conditioning broke every single summer but warranty only covered the first summer. So my wife said after four years maybe this Tempo was a lemon just buy me a new one. Stupid me I went and tried to buy her a new one and the dealer wouldn't give me hardly anything on trade for the old Tempo on a brand new one. So I said enough of this and bought her a brand new Accord and never had any further car worries. The Tempo was junk! I bet I lost more than Ford did on my Tempo over the time I owned it.
I probably got scammed tbh my 92 tempo is till running strong and reliable even till today
I worked on them at Lincoln dealership and I concur.
Went through a throttle position sensor yearly. But the A/C breaking constantly made my wife go bonkers. Got rid of it.
@@danax-zo2skLIAR
Wow. You got a bad one. My sister had one, my cousin had one, my Dad had an early one, and a friend had one. They all ran forever with no problems. They weren't particularly attractive nor fun, but as basic transportation they were aces in my book.
Senior year i dated a girl who drove a 92 GLS V6 Tempo. I liked it enough that I went out and bought a 93 Tempo LX V6. I replaced it with an 88 Taurus.
Not the 3.8 V6, though, I hope.
@@DUCKSAREEVILLLLLLLL
Nope. The Tempo and the Taurus both had the 3.0 V6. As far as the 3.8 went, my dads Windstar had it.
@@Hobotraveler82 The all iron 3.0 Vulcan has a good reputation for a reason.
I think my mom's Ford aerostar had that engine
My first ever car, in which I took my driver's license test in 1991, was a black 1985 Tempo with the red stripe in the side. Had it for 3 years, and really miss it now. Loved that car.
My grandma had a 4 door Tempo in a tiny town in South Dakota. All the cousins drove it around town as soon as we were able to reach the pedals and see over the steering wheel. Not enough power to get into any real trouble. Super reliable though.
My first car was a Tempo, I drove it as if it was made of glass cause I had heard it would break easy. The drive shaft popped out once, that was scary! :D
@LeriusDoman I've never heard of a driveshaft on a front wheel drive
@@daviddiienno Not sure what they are called, but the spinning shaft that goes to the front wheel to make it go around xD
My mother had a 93 Tempo with the optional 3.0 V6. That was a really good car for what it was, and pretty quick too with the V6. It had somewhere north of 140k when she traded it for a Plymouth Breeze in 99 or 2000.
My first (running) car was a 1992 Tempo GL. Couldn't get into too much trouble with the 2.3/3spd auto. Had power locks and mirrors, but crank windows. Mine had the driver's airbag. Downside is that the horn button was the turn signal stalk. Upside is it had conventional seatbelts instead of those godawful electric seat belts. The worst problem it had was a warped harmonic balancer, and the only time it left me stranded was because of corroded battery terminals. 32-oz Coca Cola took out the heater control buttons, and my new CD player. Sprung for the OE cassette tray mounted cup holder after that. After 3 years, I traded it in on a 1999 Jeep Cherokee. Funny thing is the similarities between the two, since their original models were both "class of 84" vehicles.
My ex-g'friend from high school had an '88 4 door dark blue Topaz GS with manual windows and only an am/fm (no cassette player), and my friends' g'friend in college had a 1990 4 door Tempo black! At the time those girls LOVED those cars. I dunno how those stories ended. I know I would Always Smile when my girl picked me up as it was better than taking the bus!!!!!😎😎🤓
I traveled a lot on business during 1986-87 and rented Tempos lot. I didn't like them very much until I rented one with an adjusted steering wheel. Made all the difference in the world! I loved driving that particular car. I'm a bog-standard man of 5'10" and I figure Ford missed badly with ergonomics on the interior.
I never knew there was an all wheel drive version of this vehicle. My high school best friend bought a 2 door 5 speed 1985 Tempo. He never had any issues with it shutting down on him and that car was a little screamer. I was actually surprised how well it ran, I'd almost put it on par with a Cavalier Z/24 in performance. It was a hidden gem in Ford's lineup.
Nice job dude! (thumbs up)
Back then I worked at Thrifty Car Rental here in Vegas. They let me take a Topaz home if it was hot because my old Jeep had no AC and they didn't want me sweaty every time I got to work! They were fine cars for the period.
Thanks for the kind word and for sharing!
I bought a '89 Topaz XR5 coupe new. It seemed practical and economical. It was woefully underpowered, and the 3 speed automatic made it noisy and buzzy at highway speeds. I traded it off on a new Sable LS within a month and never looked back.
The first car I drove with a permit was my mom's red 92 Tempo. It was a pretty good car. They had it long enough for the paint to fade to pink.
They had a reputation (not a good one) amongst us Gen X'er s. They were known for poor quality control and being absolute turds on the road. The 2.3 was an absolute gutless engine. Contrary to popular belief, it wasn't the 2.3 Lima engine (which would have been a step up), but a shortened Falcon Thriftpower 6 (by two cylinders) that was every bit as cheap as the old Falcon 6, and was a pushrod engine. The engine was because the Lima plant was running at capacity. The chassis was Escort based. It should have been better. We loved the Escort, not so much the Tempo. It was definitely aimed at middle aged people who wanted creature comforts and didn't care about moving down the road in a timely manner.
The Falcon used a straight 6, you im becile. Not even close to the Vulcan V6
Spoken like a true car salesman 👍🏼
Was popular older people of the time, who used to get Mavericks and Fairmonts with the old I6. Young kids got them 2nd hand and dumped them as soon as they could.
These were aimed at the "car as an appliance" driver. Someone who wants to get from A to B with minimal drama. Similar to people who buy a Camry or Accord. Toyota and Honda offered more exciting versions, but the vast majority of sales were in the low/mid tier range. Car companies knew they wouldn't make much per vehicle, they just planned to sell a lot of them.
Ford and GM helped boost their sales numbers through fleet sales. The Tempo/Topaz twins were all over rental lots.
It was perfectly adequate for the 55 MPH national speed limit in effect at the time it was developed.
The 1st car I have a recollection of was a 1986 Tempo GL Sport 2dr my parents bought when I was a 2yr old. It was a 5 spd, two tone gray coupe that proved very reliable. It took my family to many trips over the 6 years my dad owned it and it outlasted my mom's Town & Country Wagon and its replacement a Subaru GL Wagon. My dad would even let me tilt the wheel when parking in the garage. Having spent most of my childhood in that car would teach me how to say my 1st car word at the age of 3: Ford
Very awesome! Thanks for sharing your story!
Had a 94 tempo. Was a great car.
Had a 94 in 2009. TRULY a great car. Never let me down. Had 58,000 miles when I bough it
NO
I had an 86 topaz GL and it was loaded with every option you could imagine very plush interior. It got great fuel knowledge. Never had any problems with the motor. But eventually I got rid of it. Because little things started to go wrong and I didn't have the money to fix them.
9:32 and 9:34 In one the oddest design decisions that always stumped me, 88 the coupe was still the 84 model body design while the sedan was truly a completely different design. Even the doors were different, not just simple grill and roof treatment. There was a reasoning for this that I read in the past but cannot remember. Does anyone know the reason?
I believe they were looking to improve head room for the back seat so they hid the C pillar and made it more vertical. That's a guess. perhaps someone else can chime in. Thanks for watching!
Ford likely sold far more sedans than coupes due to the difficulty of getting into the rear seats in two door cars. The higher sales of sedans easily justifies spending more development money on these. This also easily explains why nearly truck, crossover and SUV has four doors. Look at traffic in your area and see how many four door vehicles are out there vs. two.
@@houseofno Unfortunately that explanation doesn't fly. Obviously 4 doors cars sell better even since the 1960's. Monte Carlo, Grand Prix and Cordoba personal luxury coupes had their era of high sales in the 70s but even then, when a body was changed, it was for BOTH the coupe and sedan because of the tooling. It's more expensive to keep an old coupe (as was this Tempo) on a SEPARATE assembly line, so this was NOT at all common for any automaker to do. Of course 4 door cars sell more than coupes but there's a reason Ford did it, but it's not that.
Go to 12:32 if you want to know why Ford lost money on every Tempo & Topaz sold. Hint: He says they wanted to introduce younger buyers to Ford?????