As a Richmond fan, Shai is too high at 92. Too inconsistent in front of goals and goes quiet here and there, less impact than the other players at similar rankings like Cripps and Bont imo.
I would have said 90 or 91 but feel 90 is better since he was like 3rd most innacurate last year with what 55% but really good getting the ball and snapping but still like you said inconsistent
are the crowds gonna be louder and better in AFL 23, its always been a problem for me. every person in the crowd looks the same in evo. it needs to be more realistic. the noise level and roar of the crowd is not pleasant to hear in evo. I'm hoping AFL23 would make better crowds
My question is what are you on lol. Elliot is not that good sure he’s clutch but I could name loads of players not on this list better then Jamie Elliot.
As a Collingwood fan I do agree that De goey and Maynard are a bit too high. But Elliot deserved a 90 and Maynard should still should be at least a 90.
Petracca equal first not fitting he’s great but not the top top, Shia Bolton being that high is just absurd can list many small forwards higher than him and his inefficiency at goal is to common. Jeremy Cameron not being listed as a rating or 2 behind the 93 mark is absurd
Cmon I’m a tigers fan but seriously the disrespect on dusty is insane. Yes I understand he doesn’t have as big as an impact as he did for our few years of big success but should be in the 89 on 90?
None of this really makes sense unless you know the player ratings for their individual attributes. Like the best player in the game could almost be Mark Blicavs because he'd have such high ratings across so many attributes like rucking, marking, endurance, defending etc.
@Make It Rain Productions ratings is previous games have always been funny because to make a player like Scott Pendlebury to be a 92, they needed to boost his speed stat because that was important as a midfield. But Pendlebury with a speed of 90 or a Lachie Neale with a marking of 90 just doesn't make sense.
You pronounced Coniglio wrong, I know that the commentators say it like that too but it’s pronounced co-nig-li-o. I know this because I know a Coniglio in real life and he says it as above
highest rated player on the game should be only 80 just cuz we do not have good players anymore like hird buckely voss dosnt mean you make the shit higher rated just give them honest ratings and have legends with high ratings
dustin martin 83 rated more than fair enough considering how bad the players and game is compared to 15 years ago where a chris judd who actually a good player in one of best most competitive and exciting eras in football would be a 97
As a Richmond fan, Shai is too high at 92. Too inconsistent in front of goals and goes quiet here and there, less impact than the other players at similar rankings like Cripps and Bont imo.
he is one of those players who is either off or on, as a richmond fan you watch more of him then i would, fair analysis 👌
Deserves No more than an 86
I agree as a richmond fan
I would have said 90 or 91 but feel 90 is better since he was like 3rd most innacurate last year with what 55% but really good getting the ball and snapping but still like you said inconsistent
The anti-collingwood sentiment definitely strong in this one 🤣🤣
i tried not to be bias 😂, pies are the best team in the comp, they can take it
Most of the collingwood players are way too high
@@harveymartin8502 obvious Richmond fan
Where’s Darcy parish on this list 😭 there’s no way he’s not top 50
Harris Andrews is a fair 90 playing well this year, High IQ
They should scatter out the team ratings more top 6 teams deserve an 80-87, 7-11 deserve 75-80 tops, and 12-18 65-74tops
Instantly lost all credibility when u suggested Bont should be downgraded
he's playing better this year i'll admit
Melbourne in my opinion have the best list in the comp at the moment. They should be 86 at LEAST
are the crowds gonna be louder and better in AFL 23, its always been a problem for me. every person in the crowd looks the same in evo. it needs to be more realistic. the noise level and roar of the crowd is not pleasant to hear in evo. I'm hoping AFL23 would make better crowds
but my question is this, Have these been off of just last year multiple years or even a bit of this year
Jamie Elliot deserves a 90 lmao what are you on😂
My question is what are you on lol. Elliot is not that good sure he’s clutch but I could name loads of players not on this list better then Jamie Elliot.
As a Collingwood fan I do agree that De goey and Maynard are a bit too high. But Elliot deserved a 90 and Maynard should still should be at least a 90.
Only 1 freo player in top 50 players. Made finals should of atleast had 2 within top 50
Petracca equal first not fitting he’s great but not the top top, Shia Bolton being that high is just absurd can list many small forwards higher than him and his inefficiency at goal is to common. Jeremy Cameron not being listed as a rating or 2 behind the 93 mark is absurd
where would you have bont now?
98
Why no Dangerfield
Where’s parish
true should be up there
Will you make any AFL 23 VIDEOS
if its something people want to see!
Up the pies
Unfortunate you lost to the crows last night
Petracca isn’t at neale and Oliver’s level tbh
i think his impact is the same, just maybe less stats cause he gets tagged more
Yeah please make an AFl Ev 23 vid
will do
Afl Evolution 23?
Cmon I’m a tigers fan but seriously the disrespect on dusty is insane. Yes I understand he doesn’t have as big as an impact as he did for our few years of big success but should be in the 89 on 90?
i agree by their ratings he should be up there. good chance for a comeback season from him this year.
87 at most for dusty. He barely ever plays and is no where near as good as he was
Cripps should be 94 as well. Charlie 91. Harry 90. Saad 88
Weitering 88
Walsh 87
carlton fan?
0-3 but Geelong should be equal top rated team. Interesting take.
was made before loss against gold coast, maybe correct for now but when it was first assigned maybe not. But fair point
None of this really makes sense unless you know the player ratings for their individual attributes. Like the best player in the game could almost be Mark Blicavs because he'd have such high ratings across so many attributes like rucking, marking, endurance, defending etc.
just did it in general and compared to other players, like 2K or FIFA. gotta use your imagination a bit, yes.
@Make It Rain Productions ratings is previous games have always been funny because to make a player like Scott Pendlebury to be a 92, they needed to boost his speed stat because that was important as a midfield. But Pendlebury with a speed of 90 or a Lachie Neale with a marking of 90 just doesn't make sense.
@@johnmarc1986 yeah it'll be interesting to see player's other stats
You pronounced Coniglio wrong, I know that the commentators say it like that too but it’s pronounced co-nig-li-o. I know this because I know a Coniglio in real life and he says it as above
Melbourne should be way higher
can you make afl 23 videos?
it's looking like i probably will
freo and andy brayshaw are the most over rated thing in footy
😢
libba is underrated he is a 92 at best
Brayshaw 92 😭😭😭
It went up to 94😂😂😂😂😂 bro I can't, never speak football again. Bonts left toe nail has had a better year than Brayshaw u nuff
highest rated player on the game should be only 80 just cuz we do not have good players anymore like hird buckely voss dosnt mean you make the shit higher rated just give them honest ratings and have legends with high ratings
dustin martin 83 rated more than fair enough considering how bad the players and game is compared to 15 years ago where a chris judd who actually a good player in one of best most competitive and exciting eras in football would be a 97
the game is better then it was 15 years ago, advances in modern science, nutrition, etc, and a larger sample size of players
If you think Tom Lynch is better than Brayden Maynard then you’ve obviously never watched a single game of afl
tom lynch is overhated