@@biasedjedi4353 Lincoln only freed slaves to get the csa back into the Union the slaves in Maryland, Kentucky, and Missouri were able to keep there slaves.
Wrong. Nixon and Ford were both Republicans. Black migration to the Democrats began during FDR's welfare programs and continued through LBJ's. I expect more from my tax $$$ than this lazy revision of history!
@ritemoelaw_books83 The idiocy of your last comment ruined an otherwise plausible story line. Voting blocs are great, but the geographic distribution of Blacks give it the lie. Likewise your comment that Jim Crow laws (a Democrat invention) drove Blacks to the Democrats...
@Geoff Gyro What are you 12? Listen to my family? Haha! I lived it punk, while you were told to read people's books that were selling you a story. Facts? I lived the facts in real time. Go back to your basement until you get a few more decades on you and pray hard for wisdom.
Harry s truman a democrat ordered the bombing of hiroshima and nagasaki killing two hundred fifty five thousand civilians and turning there cities into a waste land if death desease and nuklier fallout
@@273dum2 if you were president during world war 2, and there was multiple nations killing millions of innocent people, and the only way to end the war was to bomb cities, what would you do?
@@mcfrickenwatcher195 two hundred and fifty thousand innocent people died in the bombings instead what I would have done would freak out then get things under control by sending troops to counter attack the enimies defense and push them back into there territory utilizing the troops I've sent there to push the enimies back to their land setting up a defense perimeter around the enimies base and if they tried to escape order my troops to open fire that's how they caught hitler by surrounding the base so odd are I would be able to do the same until one by one there's no more enimy bases by the time half of the defenses are destroyed the enimies would focus fire inward and fall back to the bases from there battle field they would focus fire on our troops but at the same time leave the trenches open for more troops to surround them eventually they would get to distracted by our troops that they would stop killing innocent civilians and soldiers on the front line I'll call my troops out of there enimies base using a helicopter and then strike it with a small missile not a nuke
This is wildly glossed over and misrepresented. The Republican Party has always been the party of the “very day” person and anti-slavery. There never was a “switch”. The democrats today are correct in saying that America has a history of racism and oppression, it just came from one political side….. Democrat!!! It’s time for this lie to be called out and brought to light because it’s vitally important for the youth in our country. But most people now are too intellectually lazy to find out for themselves. Seriously, I mean how many people died so that we could uprise against the very country they died protecting??
There is an instinct to trace political evolution backward from now rather than to start at the beginning. That’s how notions like Conservatism being innately about small government and Liberalism a big one arise. The associations were reversed in fact at the Founding. The Hamiltonian Federalists represented a kind of Classical Conservatism which saw a strong national government as essential to preserving order. The Jeffersonian Republicans espoused a rigorous Classical Liberalism which perceived it to be an oppressive tool of the elite. As liberal teachings had informed the American Revolution, both camps were influenced by them. They reached consensus on recognizing natural rights, constraining government power, abandoning hereditary titles of nobility as well as the separation of church and state. The Hamiltonians, however, maintained conservative attitudes on central banking, protectionism, restricting immigration and property requirements for the vote. The Jeffersonians championed the liberal ideals of laissez-faire, free trade, open immigration and extending political suffrage to the common man. A nationalist versus internationalist divide emerged which shaped a lot of their disagreements. Perhaps the fiercest ensued when looming conflict around England and France aggravated tensions. Contrary to conventional wisdom, the federal over state position was used for conservative purposes when Federalists passed the Alien and Sedition Acts. Efforts to thwart radicalism that involved putting foreigners under scrutiny. And the anti-federalist stance, albeit complicated by later battles, was applied for liberal ends when Republicans retaliated with the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions. Decrying them as violations of civil liberties, they asserted that the states could declare federal laws that they deemed unconstitutional void. A big deal in an age of centralized empires. Though the sectional question of slavery shook up the political landscape in a variety of ways, those concepts carried on in essence as the guiding orthodoxies for the modern Republican and Democratic leaderships. But the distinction has been obscured in memory. Take two icons for limited government types who embodied the competing intellectual traditions. Hamiltonianism in the Republican Calvin Coolidge and Jeffersonianism in the Democrat Grover Cleveland. Cleveland vetoed an immigration bill which featured a literacy test as a barrier in 1897 while Coolidge signed into law such a proposal in 1924. Cleveland ran on reducing tariffs while Coolidge kept tariff rates high. Cleveland opposed national banks while Coolidge let the Federal Reserve be. Cleveland set in motion the landmark antitrust lawsuit known as the Sugar Trust Case while Coolidge ended a string of administrations that had launched many of them. Cleveland put into place the Interstate Commerce Commission to protect consumers by overseeing trade while Coolidge appointed to it and the subsequent Federal Trade Commission hands-off commissioners to facilitate economic growth. It is their shared commitment to individualism, low taxes, sound money, balanced budgets and fiscal restraint that attracts the overlapping fans. Increasing demand for government intervention ignited during the Progressive Era blurred the line between the old-fashioned conservatives and liberals weary of it. Their ideas, regardless of the historical rivalry, now tend to get lumped together in the conservative category and pit against Progressivism. It also treated as one thing, usually under the name Liberalism, despite the initial disharmony there as well. The Republican Theodore Roosevelt and Democrat Woodrow Wilson were the first progressive presidents from their parties. Though it was their successors who coined the terms Progressive Conservatism and Progressive Liberalism for their ideologies, each described himself with the pair of labels. Both differed from their classical counterparts with respect to the scope of government, but there are parallels in how they contrasted each other. Comparing Roosevelt and Wilson helps in differentiating between them. Roosevelt akin to Coolidge signed off on measures to curb immigration which included a literacy test in 1903 while Wilson like Cleveland before him rejected legislation of that sort in 1917. As expressed in his 1902 State of the Union Address, Roosevelt advocated protectionism. Wilson, on the other hand, favored free trade. A goal propounded in his Fourteen Points. Both pursued economic regulation. But though dubbed the Trustbuster, Roosevelt was not hostile to monopolies on principle. Approving of what he called good trusts like U.S. Steel. Wilson pushed for the Clayton Antitrust Act in a bid to level the playing field by breaking them all up. The argument between nationalism and internationalism gained a new dimension with their foreign policy opinions. TR believed in the superiority of Anglo-Saxon societies and, as affirmed by his Roosevelt Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine, their duty to police the world. Conversely, Wilson claimed that no nation was fit to sit in judgement of another. His ultimate aim was global governance through the League of Nations. Much like Classical Liberalism, Progressive Conservatism is largely overlooked in these discussions. Observing them can illuminate trends which go back to the First Party System. Conditions created by the Second Industrial Revolution prompted the re-examination of accepted conservative and liberal precepts. Elements of both parties became convinced that government action was needed to remedy escalating unrest. Especially after the rise of the Populist Movement which fought for agrarian and industrial labor interests. The Populists coalesced into the People’s Party until rallying to the Democrat William Jennings Bryan to defy the rich and aid the poor. Republicans such as Roosevelt concluded that reform was necessary to prevent the country from descending into chaos. The key difference was that Bryan’s party selected him as its presidential candidate three times while Roosevelt’s gave him the vice presidency because it was thought that he couldn’t rock the boat there. Only taking office by chance after the assassination of William McKinley. And a greater number of delegates lent their support to the moderate William Howard Taft instead when he attempted to go for a third term. Admirers of Cleveland left to form the National Democratic Party when Bryan came out on top in 1896. Likewise, Roosevelt and his followers walked out to organize the original Progressive Party after Taft received the nomination in 1912. Each split benefited the other major party and they quickly declined. Internal debates persisted, but precedents were set. Though Bryan never won, Wilson acted on several of his causes. And Franklin Roosevelt actually endorsed Wilson, not Teddy, in 1912. He built on his prototypical administrative state with the New Deal. An agenda of then unmatched government activism. In keeping with Warren G. Harding and Coolidge’s Post-Wilson Return to Normalcy, Republicans led by Robert Taft worked at rolling it back. The election of Dwight Eisenhower marked a truce. His philosophy of Dynamic Conservatism made peace with the New Deal zeitgeist, but he sought to rein in any excesses. The further turns within the Democratic and Republican parties are clear-cut. The New Left and New Right adopted by George McGovern and Ronald Reagan both challenged the popular assumptions of their day. Focusing on social issues and government control. The Third Way and Compassionate Conservatism advanced by Bill Clinton and George W. Bush both moved toward the center. Reflecting upon the free market and social justice. Each establishment now confronts a populist wave. Democratic Socialism and National Conservatism are embraced by those that Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump have emboldened. Fed up with the ruling class, both aspire to tilt the balance of power. Granted, each from early on housed factions that spanned the political spectrum. Of note are those epitomized by the Democrat John C. Calhoun and Republican Horace Greeley. Calhoun defended the status quo for Southern planters while Greeley promoted Utopian Socialism. The two served as prominent party figures up until they, alongside other dissidents, were faced with critical disputes which drove them apart. Calhoun set up the Nullifier Party after a bitter falling-out with Andrew Jackson due to him standing by the federal government in a mounting crisis with South Carolina over the Tariff of 1828. Greeley ran as the Liberal Republican Party nominee against Ulysses S. Grant in the election of 1872 in protest of scandals in his administration tied to big business. But not even allying with their partisan adversaries, the Nullifiers with the Whigs and the Liberal Republicans with the Democrats, was enough to defeat Jackson or Grant. Most of their members soon dispersed among them both. Friction lingered between right-leaning Republican and left-leaning Democratic national parties and the left-wing Republicans and right-wing Democrats holding considerable sway at the state level with whom they compromised. The La Follette Wisconsin Republican and Talmadge Georgia Democratic machines were examples which came to blows with the Coolidge Campaign and FDR Administration. More infrastructure development coupled with gradual modernization led to the regions converging economically and culturally. That resulted in Republicans and Democrats amassing vast majorities of conservatives and liberals. Broadly speaking, along small town and big city lines. Both have indeed changed with time, quibbled over details and contained shifting coalitions. But their values remain fundamentally rooted in Hamiltonian pro-business conservative nationalism and Jeffersonian anti-elitist liberal internationalism.
I must say I absolutely LOVE this post. You really got into the heart of the liberal and conservative mindsets that have persisted throughout history. So many people assume conservatism means limited government and liberalism means a more active government, but that is a very contemporary way to view politics. If you don't mind, I'll be using this post as a reference to explain the evolutions of the two parties.
@@jyu467 Oh my, thank you for the compliments! Feel free to utilize anything I brought up in there as you wish. There's of course more that could be touched on, and I have in other comments, but I've always found that to be the best primer which gets the basic point across and I hope sets a cordial rather than hostile tone as is so often the case when this particular topic comes up. One that I think most people have a bad habit of oversimplifying for purely partisan reasons. Anyway, it actually does mean a great deal to me to receive feedback of any kind.
@@mint8648 Neat! There’s admittedly some things I’d probably rework about this, or perhaps give more attention to instead, if I returned to it nowadays, but I’d say that I still stand by most of what I have written there. Lol
oh wow voice of America, I like your democratic video and Republican party video but can you re-make these videos and add more detail in them along with adding about more info about world war I and how that helps improved the democratic party and how the democratic party voted more to get the civil rights Act of 1964 passed, then the great depression and how 3 republican presidents kept giving big bankers and rich citizens more funds within there bank accounts and not disputing out to low and middle classes within the 2 parties, Watergate and the energy crisis and Iran contra affair and our current president Joe Biden and his 42 new Acts and bills.
LINCOLN DID NOT GET RID OF SLAVERY DEFUND THE SLAVER ENABLERS READ YOUR CONSTITUTION THE 13th AMENDMENT STILL CONTAINS INSTITUTIONALIZED SLAVERY WHICH IS DIRECTED MOSTLY AT MINORITIES
13th amendment: Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.
I always think its disingenous of our party to claim Abraham Lincoln and fighting to free the slaves during the civil war, but then completely skip the part about the civil rights movement when explaining the shift in party demographics. It's kind of a key part of explaining why the former CONFEDERATE states are currently the republican stronghold.
How is it rewriting history? This actually happened. Just do your own research on the Republican Party and you will see for yourself. My school taught it like this because it is a TRUTH. This is ACTUAL HISTORY. If you do not believe so than I suggest you do your own research.
13th amendment: Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.
Do whatever you want in usa but respect Brazil national sovereignty , and Democraty party dont mess with Brazil and amazonia, we are free from ONU dictatorship
Yes you do a Brooklyn are you gonna do I had a meal that’s why you got to come together this is no joke people on a daily go out with the truth always comes to people that’s all baby don’t have a heart and 51 Comet Antonio this Facebook thing is no different than my sleigh and a 19 6768 no problem I will do all information I want to know about your buddy play with you no more oh it was a research how do you do research baby you got a whole video and comment
God is in Control Amen X’S 3 ❤️❤️❤️🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽🙌🏾🙌🏾🙌🏾❤️❤️❤️🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽🙌🏾🙌🏾🙌🏾❤️❤️❤️🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽🙌🏾🙌🏾🙌🏾 Thanks for doing your homework somebody wants to research it report history report where do you say thank you no thank you Jesus he’s going to win the people we go I was looking OK thank you very much no thank he’s never been there we can change the name of the place and this is called a house in Washington called a mama house so there you go yeah I made it the way it is Samuel I went to Nagel Alameda Junior high school yeah it is Samuel well God bless y’allStop being present that the reason that got a put them up at the job he goes going to Bismarck did you see were Trump it and you know what triggered big nicks in the mail from you where they just know I wanna go to say it’s enough is enough you get me right OK you tell me stop it at their home OK so depressing about to win a Disney it was the best present ever I don’t care what nobody say people hate details of your provider for president or the president everybody screwed up all them down the road is it down there but is it is love you
Abraham Lincoln is by far the best republican US-Präsident in History!😎👍❤
He’s the best president in history imo. Yet people have the audacity to say the right is racist, when they freed the slaves.
@@biasedjedi4353 Lincoln only freed slaves to get the csa back into the Union the slaves in Maryland, Kentucky, and Missouri were able to keep there slaves.
@@singleyellow Are you serious? You’re trolling? Right?
@@lamaripiazza5226 At least he made a difference.
@@biasedjedi4353 Yeah
Wrong. Nixon and Ford were both Republicans.
Black migration to the Democrats began during FDR's welfare programs and continued through LBJ's.
I expect more from my tax $$$ than this lazy revision of history!
+++
@ritemoelaw_books83 The idiocy of your last comment ruined an otherwise plausible story line. Voting blocs are great, but the geographic distribution of Blacks give it the lie.
Likewise your comment that Jim Crow laws (a Democrat invention) drove Blacks to the Democrats...
@Geoff Gyro You definitely should be under the age of 35. Congratulations 👏 you have graduated with honors in the indoctrination bs of the left.
@Geoff Gyro
What are you 12? Listen to my family? Haha! I lived it punk, while you were told to read people's books that were selling you a story. Facts? I lived the facts in real time. Go back to your basement until you get a few more decades on you and pray hard for wisdom.
Republic party forever
HELL YEAH BROTHA
I can't wait to see the democrat history
They can’t make that one, too many white pointy hoods ...
@@dkol3250 bruhhh😂
Harry s truman a democrat ordered the bombing of hiroshima and nagasaki killing two hundred fifty five thousand civilians and turning there cities into a waste land if death desease and nuklier fallout
@@273dum2 if you were president during world war 2, and there was multiple nations killing millions of innocent people, and the only way to end the war was to bomb cities, what would you do?
@@mcfrickenwatcher195 two hundred and fifty thousand innocent people died in the bombings instead what I would have done would freak out then get things under control by sending troops to counter attack the enimies defense and push them back into there territory utilizing the troops I've sent there to push the enimies back to their land setting up a defense perimeter around the enimies base and if they tried to escape order my troops to open fire that's how they caught hitler by surrounding the base so odd are I would be able to do the same until one by one there's no more enimy bases by the time half of the defenses are destroyed the enimies would focus fire inward and fall back to the bases from there battle field they would focus fire on our troops but at the same time leave the trenches open for more troops to surround them eventually they would get to distracted by our troops that they would stop killing innocent civilians and soldiers on the front line I'll call my troops out of there enimies base using a helicopter and then strike it with a small missile not a nuke
Correction: George Bush was a big government conservative.
Explain
Ronald Reagan was the best president ever..... he was a great president for us the republicans
Спасибо деду за победу. Благодарю его за развал империи зла.
If Ronald trump runs for office again he's definitely getting my vote
The lines are so blurred today that the only logical choice is independence from all party affiliation. Undeclared.
Thats the curse of two party 🥳 state 🤪
Yes dear
Hey I need a good man to take care of me
The party that doesn't care about the saftey, health and well-being of this nation. That's the gop.
Wrong
It's sad that this party changed
It didn't change a bit.
Mostly the media gave us the reputation that we are racist or whatever.
@Loopy how do you mean that?
@@linusschmutz3985 facts
This is wildly glossed over and misrepresented. The Republican Party has always been the party of the “very day” person and anti-slavery. There never was a “switch”.
The democrats today are correct in saying that America has a history of racism and oppression, it just came from one political side….. Democrat!!!
It’s time for this lie to be called out and brought to light because it’s vitally important for the youth in our country. But most people now are too intellectually lazy to find out for themselves. Seriously, I mean how many people died so that we could uprise against the very country they died protecting??
I like how this vid was honest about the party switch and how it was economically based rather based on civil rights
It was at least both economics and civil rights. The party switch is a bit more complicated than what this 2 minutes video showed.
There is an instinct to trace political evolution backward from now rather than to start at the beginning. That’s how notions like Conservatism being innately about small government and Liberalism a big one arise. The associations were reversed in fact at the Founding. The Hamiltonian Federalists represented a kind of Classical Conservatism which saw a strong national government as essential to preserving order. The Jeffersonian Republicans espoused a rigorous Classical Liberalism which perceived it to be an oppressive tool of the elite. As liberal teachings had informed the American Revolution, both camps were influenced by them. They reached consensus on recognizing natural rights, constraining government power, abandoning hereditary titles of nobility as well as the separation of church and state.
The Hamiltonians, however, maintained conservative attitudes on central banking, protectionism, restricting immigration and property requirements for the vote. The Jeffersonians championed the liberal ideals of laissez-faire, free trade, open immigration and extending political suffrage to the common man. A nationalist versus internationalist divide emerged which shaped a lot of their disagreements. Perhaps the fiercest ensued when looming conflict around England and France aggravated tensions. Contrary to conventional wisdom, the federal over state position was used for conservative purposes when Federalists passed the Alien and Sedition Acts. Efforts to thwart radicalism that involved putting foreigners under scrutiny. And the anti-federalist stance, albeit complicated by later battles, was applied for liberal ends when Republicans retaliated with the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions. Decrying them as violations of civil liberties, they asserted that the states could declare federal laws that they deemed unconstitutional void. A big deal in an age of centralized empires.
Though the sectional question of slavery shook up the political landscape in a variety of ways, those concepts carried on in essence as the guiding orthodoxies for the modern Republican and Democratic leaderships. But the distinction has been obscured in memory. Take two icons for limited government types who embodied the competing intellectual traditions. Hamiltonianism in the Republican Calvin Coolidge and Jeffersonianism in the Democrat Grover Cleveland. Cleveland vetoed an immigration bill which featured a literacy test as a barrier in 1897 while Coolidge signed into law such a proposal in 1924. Cleveland ran on reducing tariffs while Coolidge kept tariff rates high. Cleveland opposed national banks while Coolidge let the Federal Reserve be. Cleveland set in motion the landmark antitrust lawsuit known as the Sugar Trust Case while Coolidge ended a string of administrations that had launched many of them.
Cleveland put into place the Interstate Commerce Commission to protect consumers by overseeing trade while Coolidge appointed to it and the subsequent Federal Trade Commission hands-off commissioners to facilitate economic growth. It is their shared commitment to individualism, low taxes, sound money, balanced budgets and fiscal restraint that attracts the overlapping fans. Increasing demand for government intervention ignited during the Progressive Era blurred the line between the old-fashioned conservatives and liberals weary of it. Their ideas, regardless of the historical rivalry, now tend to get lumped together in the conservative category and pit against Progressivism. It also treated as one thing, usually under the name Liberalism, despite the initial disharmony there as well.
The Republican Theodore Roosevelt and Democrat Woodrow Wilson were the first progressive presidents from their parties. Though it was their successors who coined the terms Progressive Conservatism and Progressive Liberalism for their ideologies, each described himself with the pair of labels. Both differed from their classical counterparts with respect to the scope of government, but there are parallels in how they contrasted each other. Comparing Roosevelt and Wilson helps in differentiating between them. Roosevelt akin to Coolidge signed off on measures to curb immigration which included a literacy test in 1903 while Wilson like Cleveland before him rejected legislation of that sort in 1917. As expressed in his 1902 State of the Union Address, Roosevelt advocated protectionism. Wilson, on the other hand, favored free trade. A goal propounded in his Fourteen Points.
Both pursued economic regulation. But though dubbed the Trustbuster, Roosevelt was not hostile to monopolies on principle. Approving of what he called good trusts like U.S. Steel. Wilson pushed for the Clayton Antitrust Act in a bid to level the playing field by breaking them all up. The argument between nationalism and internationalism gained a new dimension with their foreign policy opinions. TR believed in the superiority of Anglo-Saxon societies and, as affirmed by his Roosevelt Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine, their duty to police the world. Conversely, Wilson claimed that no nation was fit to sit in judgement of another. His ultimate aim was global governance through the League of Nations. Much like Classical Liberalism, Progressive Conservatism is largely overlooked in these discussions. Observing them can illuminate trends which go back to the First Party System.
Conditions created by the Second Industrial Revolution prompted the re-examination of accepted conservative and liberal precepts. Elements of both parties became convinced that government action was needed to remedy escalating unrest. Especially after the rise of the Populist Movement which fought for agrarian and industrial labor interests. The Populists coalesced into the People’s Party until rallying to the Democrat William Jennings Bryan to defy the rich and aid the poor. Republicans such as Roosevelt concluded that reform was necessary to prevent the country from descending into chaos. The key difference was that Bryan’s party selected him as its presidential candidate three times while Roosevelt’s gave him the vice presidency because it was thought that he couldn’t rock the boat there. Only taking office by chance after the assassination of William McKinley. And a greater number of delegates lent their support to the moderate William Howard Taft instead when he attempted to go for a third term.
Admirers of Cleveland left to form the National Democratic Party when Bryan came out on top in 1896. Likewise, Roosevelt and his followers walked out to organize the original Progressive Party after Taft received the nomination in 1912. Each split benefited the other major party and they quickly declined. Internal debates persisted, but precedents were set. Though Bryan never won, Wilson acted on several of his causes. And Franklin Roosevelt actually endorsed Wilson, not Teddy, in 1912. He built on his prototypical administrative state with the New Deal. An agenda of then unmatched government activism. In keeping with Warren G. Harding and Coolidge’s Post-Wilson Return to Normalcy, Republicans led by Robert Taft worked at rolling it back. The election of Dwight Eisenhower marked a truce. His philosophy of Dynamic Conservatism made peace with the New Deal zeitgeist, but he sought to rein in any excesses.
The further turns within the Democratic and Republican parties are clear-cut. The New Left and New Right adopted by George McGovern and Ronald Reagan both challenged the popular assumptions of their day. Focusing on social issues and government control. The Third Way and Compassionate Conservatism advanced by Bill Clinton and George W. Bush both moved toward the center. Reflecting upon the free market and social justice. Each establishment now confronts a populist wave. Democratic Socialism and National Conservatism are embraced by those that Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump have emboldened. Fed up with the ruling class, both aspire to tilt the balance of power.
Granted, each from early on housed factions that spanned the political spectrum. Of note are those epitomized by the Democrat John C. Calhoun and Republican Horace Greeley. Calhoun defended the status quo for Southern planters while Greeley promoted Utopian Socialism. The two served as prominent party figures up until they, alongside other dissidents, were faced with critical disputes which drove them apart. Calhoun set up the Nullifier Party after a bitter falling-out with Andrew Jackson due to him standing by the federal government in a mounting crisis with South Carolina over the Tariff of 1828. Greeley ran as the Liberal Republican Party nominee against Ulysses S. Grant in the election of 1872 in protest of scandals in his administration tied to big business. But not even allying with their partisan adversaries, the Nullifiers with the Whigs and the Liberal Republicans with the Democrats, was enough to defeat Jackson or Grant. Most of their members soon dispersed among them both.
Friction lingered between right-leaning Republican and left-leaning Democratic national parties and the left-wing Republicans and right-wing Democrats holding considerable sway at the state level with whom they compromised. The La Follette Wisconsin Republican and Talmadge Georgia Democratic machines were examples which came to blows with the Coolidge Campaign and FDR Administration. More infrastructure development coupled with gradual modernization led to the regions converging economically and culturally. That resulted in Republicans and Democrats amassing vast majorities of conservatives and liberals. Broadly speaking, along small town and big city lines. Both have indeed changed with time, quibbled over details and contained shifting coalitions. But their values remain fundamentally rooted in Hamiltonian pro-business conservative nationalism and Jeffersonian anti-elitist liberal internationalism.
I must say I absolutely LOVE this post. You really got into the heart of the liberal and conservative mindsets that have persisted throughout history. So many people assume conservatism means limited government and liberalism means a more active government, but that is a very contemporary way to view politics.
If you don't mind, I'll be using this post as a reference to explain the evolutions of the two parties.
@@jyu467 Oh my, thank you for the compliments! Feel free to utilize anything I brought up in there as you wish. There's of course more that could be touched on, and I have in other comments, but I've always found that to be the best primer which gets the basic point across and I hope sets a cordial rather than hostile tone as is so often the case when this particular topic comes up. One that I think most people have a bad habit of oversimplifying for purely partisan reasons. Anyway, it actually does mean a great deal to me to receive feedback of any kind.
Will read this later
@@mint8648 Neat! There’s admittedly some things I’d probably rework about this, or perhaps give more attention to instead, if I returned to it nowadays, but I’d say that I still stand by most of what I have written there. Lol
oh wow voice of America, I like your democratic video and Republican party video but can you re-make these videos and add more detail in them along with adding about more info about world war I and how that helps improved the democratic party and how the democratic party voted more to get the civil rights Act of 1964 passed, then the great depression and how 3 republican presidents kept giving big bankers and rich citizens more funds within there bank accounts and not disputing out to low and middle classes within the 2 parties, Watergate and the energy crisis and Iran contra affair and our current president Joe Biden and his 42 new Acts and bills.
Trump my President one more time....
Ewwwww
@@justicefonfara17 I still like Trump too!
Ew
TRUMP 2024! The elections were stolen
Trump 2024!!! 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
MAGA!
Absolutely NO. Stop drinking the Kool-Aid.
Biden is drinking the blood of children
Интересно, было бы это полномасштабное вторжение россии в Украину, если бы Трамп сегодня был президентом?
YES
Make America Great Again
From Lincoln to Trump
LINCOLN DID NOT GET RID OF SLAVERY
DEFUND THE SLAVER ENABLERS
READ YOUR CONSTITUTION
THE 13th AMENDMENT STILL CONTAINS INSTITUTIONALIZED SLAVERY WHICH IS DIRECTED MOSTLY AT MINORITIES
13th amendment: Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.
I always think its disingenous of our party to claim Abraham Lincoln and fighting to free the slaves during the civil war, but then completely skip the part about the civil rights movement when explaining the shift in party demographics. It's kind of a key part of explaining why the former CONFEDERATE states are currently the republican stronghold.
I love republics
Tell me who was the founder of Republic party ?
Its not him
John C. Fremont
People who stoped the racists
Why is the video disliked? Is it not good when fox does unedited and produced livestreams of the government? |
Sad rewriting history in this way
This isn't rewriting history, this actually happened.
How is it rewriting history? This actually happened. Just do your own research on the Republican Party and you will see for yourself. My school taught it like this because it is a TRUTH. This is ACTUAL HISTORY. If you do not believe so than I suggest you do your own research.
@@neveragain.3132 I know it happened we learn it in school. Who is trying to rewrite history?
@@Jdjdenedidokalaos I apologize for the comment, I was aiming it towards the same comment you replied too.
@@neveragain.3132 it's good fam
Republican party founded by 150 black men in Houston Texas
I'm definitely not a biden fan not biding for biden Mr hiden no way I'm riden with Biden Mr president joe blow Biden
Good Reporting
My family members love Donald trump supporters he's our president our choice between All the other runners for president seat in the white house 🏠🏡
💯👍
13th amendment: Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.
Donald Trump moves further right on social policies? Which ones?
None of them
This is the most low information video I have ever watched
Pathetic! These guys have fallen so hard that they are pretty much finished . |
Don't forget about Obama, Biden
Ohh God, what a way to end the video “Bush and Trump, pushed Rep Party, further to the right” ohhh God what a bias statement!
Do whatever you want in usa but respect Brazil national sovereignty , and Democraty party dont mess with Brazil and amazonia, we are free from ONU dictatorship
😂😂😂😂😂😂Lol so many married cousins here😂😂😂😂😂….. FT KT.
Man Wich was named after Biden sloppy joes
Yes you do a Brooklyn are you gonna do I had a meal that’s why you got to come together this is no joke people on a daily go out with the truth always comes to people that’s all baby don’t have a heart and 51 Comet Antonio this Facebook thing is no different than my sleigh and a 19 6768 no problem I will do all information I want to know about your buddy play with you no more oh it was a research how do you do research baby you got a whole video and comment
0:46
0:01
Oh by the way Democrats I'm not the least bit sorry 😐 for remarks about Biden and his team
REP party includes most of bunch of bs
And the democrats don't? Do I have to remind you.
Pro-Abortion
Immigration
Lgbt
Some socialist
"Wokeness"
Etc.
Lot of bs, right?
F democrats
And democrats?
Dutchscence can get dang close!! |
:01
God is in Control Amen X’S 3 ❤️❤️❤️🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽🙌🏾🙌🏾🙌🏾❤️❤️❤️🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽🙌🏾🙌🏾🙌🏾❤️❤️❤️🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽🙌🏾🙌🏾🙌🏾 Thanks for doing your homework somebody wants to research it report history report where do you say thank you no thank you Jesus he’s going to win the people we go I was looking OK thank you very much no thank he’s never been there we can change the name of the place and this is called a house in Washington called a mama house so there you go yeah I made it the way it is Samuel I went to Nagel Alameda Junior high school yeah it is Samuel well God bless y’allStop being present that the reason that got a put them up at the job he goes going to Bismarck did you see were Trump it and you know what triggered big nicks in the mail from you where they just know I wanna go to say it’s enough is enough you get me right OK you tell me stop it at their home OK so depressing about to win a Disney it was the best present ever I don’t care what nobody say people hate details of your provider for president or the president everybody screwed up all them down the road is it down there but is it is love you
#abusedbyrepublicans
0:02