HHO High Voltage Cap Dump Circuit Conditioned 2 Weeks

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 11 сен 2024
  • Tap Water, No electrolyte
    About 14mA, at 1.7w. 120V
    Output has increased over 2 week period. I also get almost no brown gunk when running it on the alternator. Still some downsides which need later addressed.
    Circuit wiring diagram i.imgur.com/ze...

Комментарии • 16

  • @ftwproject658
    @ftwproject658 9 месяцев назад

    Yes, looks like more production. The cap dump method, especially by single-wire diode, and SGs in parallel seems to be the missing piece for alot of experiments. Well done !

  • @godwinsboom
    @godwinsboom 10 месяцев назад

    I have a video of a man's cell where it was put under vacuum for a test. Huge difference in output. I'd love to see that test repeated.

  • @georgeASD
    @georgeASD 7 месяцев назад

    from what l read about Meyer, you should get more than 20,000 volts to rise the production, some even say 40,000, the exact frecuency lm not sure, but you have 2 of the 3 variables already: 20,000 volts at 1 amp or less, at X frecuency.

  • @Themilkmanmilkermilkingmilkmen
    @Themilkmanmilkermilkingmilkmen 9 месяцев назад

    Have you looked at any of the videos from
    “Stanley A Meyer HHO H2 Hydrogen”

  • @ChrisMcNeely
    @ChrisMcNeely 11 месяцев назад

    yes, looks like more gas production, btw you can use a Digital Manometer to easily measure pressure buildup for more accurate measurements ...

  • @mykedoes4099
    @mykedoes4099 11 месяцев назад

    👍

  • @dapakers
    @dapakers 9 месяцев назад

    this must be powered by audio amplifiers.for tuning . .starts with 2 volts..chamge water after its get darker.repeat the process and raise voltage gradually..untill white substance accumulate on negative plates inside.. this white substance increases efficiency and lowering input while producing more bigger bubbles..watch RAVI RAJU video 15 years ago. on youtube.they are the pioneer on replicating stan meyers wfc

  • @SilentShiba
    @SilentShiba 11 месяцев назад +1

    You could make a torch if you saved the gas in a bladder. Would probably be wicked for brazing

    • @simonl7784
      @simonl7784 11 месяцев назад +2

      that would be quite dangerous. even a small quantity going off indoors will bust your ear drums. That's why no one stores hho and it's always used as it's produced.

  • @krisztianadrian8528
    @krisztianadrian8528 11 месяцев назад

    Is it possible to use uo to 7 amps , to see how mutch gas production would be posiible , i would like to use on a diesel combustion engine ... to use up to max 70watts from the car alternator ...

    • @weighta6630
      @weighta6630  11 месяцев назад

      You can do the 7 amps by raising the voltage, yes, however, that definitely won't do anything with an engine. The output I got off camera was impressive, but still not enough. hardly foamed or "boiled" the water.

    • @ElijahCokeley
      @ElijahCokeley 6 месяцев назад

      @a6630 I think the next step is to get a frequency generator and modulate the frequency, slowly sweeping from low to high, recording the entire thing. Eventually you should be able to get a relative maxima of gas production. However, right now the frequency is dependent on how long it takes the capacitors to build charge before discharge. Therefore, a continual high voltage source from a tesla coil with a frequency modulator could get you the desired experimental outcome since you could control both voltage and frequency. Only change one variable at a time. Maybe the water needs to all be arranged in the same orientation with a base level electric field in addition to the pulsing power applied. That way the water is oriented such that intermolecular bonding only helps disassociate the water. Also, you wont loose as much energy into heat rotating the water to the same orientation after it has moved. 16-21 tetrahertz will boil the water so avoid that range of frequency unless you want it to heat up. Anyways, good job. Keep going :)

  • @raloed.363
    @raloed.363 11 месяцев назад

    I found out an easier way to measure the gas production. Just cut a 2 litre bottle at its bottom and place it down into the container so that all the gas have to go up into the bottle. With the bottle cap not on and the top of the bottle submerge just under the water you then fill a 60ml syringe with water by either pushing it down into the water with the end open then seealing the end so that the water stays in it when you pull it up and place it over the bottle top . If the container dont have enough space to push the syringe all the way down just use another syringe or somthinh to suck up the water. Then measure the gas collected in the syringe vs time.

  • @mykedoes4099
    @mykedoes4099 11 месяцев назад

    I dont believe there is such a thing as flow , instead excited vibrational state , of course this state of vibration can propel things in directions based of the angle of the vibration which is probably dictated by the cycle speed of your pulse , it can be on/off pulse or it can be +10/+5 pulse like AC you know it as +10/-!0 I dont believe there is such a thing as a negative only a lesser positive. only silence aka OFF is anything close to a negative signal , symantechly the word negative means "NO" or "OFF" we just term neg pos so we can understand AC cause were two simple minded to se +10 and +5 , you can easily simulate AC by generating a +10 and a +5 the same as inverters do it today by generating a +10 dc and - 10 dc in 60 hz pulse