Yeah, Torrya, I get it. She's like so many "interviewers", they 1: can't shut up and 2: love the sound of their own voices. I worked in broadcasting for a while and the first thing I learned was don't talk over someone, it's confusing and just bad communication skills. Anyway, I wish there was less ego and more paying attention.
Before starting watching the video I read the comments and I thought that you all are exaggerating about the Yes Lady but Gosh, she is irritating indeed! 😂
Have been watching several of these interviews and lectures. This is not how you interview an expert. It is as if she is regurgitating all she has read on the subject and giving all the answer rather than letting the expert reveal the information. On top of this, she is not listening to what is being said before jumping on to the next question. Her vocalizations are absolutely not necessary and very jarring to this listener.
81 Ok, I must admit that I was going to scannnnnnndalously do this, but, I’m on a better purposeful path (or at least, I’m TRYYYYYYY-YINNNNNNNG to!). Though I resisted ... I failed, and ended-up giving-in to OCD and counting (with pepita seeds nonetheless) the number of times the interviewer said ‘yes’, as an extra. I didn’t include any alternates or substitutes (the word ‘okay’ shows itself very often as well), but just that one word, as a [bad] habit ... much if not entirely like mine own! Annnnnnd, of course, I’m posting it. BUT, I do-so in good faith that anyone reading it will have a chuckle rather than send ire my way. Ok, as you were.
You're right. But you shouldn't expect human beings to be perfect in any one thing, especially in the pronunciation of foreign names. If that's going irritate you, you're in for a life of pure hell
I don't understand your giggling at things not intended to be funny. Comments about others tragedy n suffering, make you laugh. What's wrong with you....
I knew, through my landlord in the late 1960s to beginning of the 1970s, an extraordinary and deeply trouble painter, an gay, dapper artist named Erick (or Erik or Erich) Schnickwald, who seems to have ended up totally forgotten. Schnickwald's life was very irregular; he seemed to be obsessed by the demonic in a disturbing way; and his art, gorgeously executed, featured endless elements of fire, blood, and suffering, maybe downright Hellish. He is about the type, perhaps, that Caravaggio was in his own way. The last that I saw of Eric was by chance on the street, by then poor, working in a menial job, and, as ever, despairing. His fey personal beauty, too, disappeared in sags and a paunch.
No,he wasnt. Others may have been. Michelangelo was probably despite no conclusive evidence that he was sexually active. Da Vinci on the other hand was gay
![Wiz Khalifa - Khalifa's Home [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/wnrLCTe0Nz4/mqdefault.jpg)
In my lifetimes, I really hope I'd get to see and enjoy Caravaggio's paintings🤞🙏
it was 'ears cutting' when this lovely presenter were injecting her questions and multiple 'Yes-es' and 'Ok's'. It was testing my patience great deal!
Yeah, Torrya, I get it. She's like so many "interviewers", they 1: can't shut up and 2: love the sound of their own voices. I worked in broadcasting for a while and the first thing I learned was don't talk over someone, it's confusing and just bad communication skills. Anyway, I wish there was less ego and more paying attention.
I agree. Her questions were fine, but it felt like she was rushing him through his answers so that she could just squeeze in her next question.
"Lovely"? 😕
seems like an author I would enjoy reading. especially because of his effort to relate historical facts to our modern world
Thank you for uploading!
Thank You for Your Sublime Information on Caravaghio. Malta
So nice of you
Before starting watching the video I read the comments and I thought that you all are exaggerating about the Yes Lady but Gosh, she is irritating indeed! 😂
Caravaggio is the goat 🐐!!
Have been watching several of these interviews and lectures. This is not how you interview an expert. It is as if she is regurgitating all she has read on the subject and giving all the answer rather than letting the expert reveal the information. On top of this, she is not listening to what is being said before jumping on to the next question. Her vocalizations are absolutely not necessary and very jarring to this listener.
Great interview!
Liked this 😄
great facts great upload thankyou
BEAUTIFUL INDEED...
Her responses are so inappropriate it's hard to listen to her. She seems more interested in asking her next question than listening to the author.
Andrew Graham-Dixon I admire patience with that stupid kundou
Aggravating interviewer!
Ask your question, and be quiet for the answer please!
I wish interviewers would stay in the shade and let the light shine on the guest but maybe she was nervous ?!
Yes, yes, yesss, oh nooooo?!?!?!
My goodness,this woman saying yes,humm,ok. Be silent and let Andrew speak
I admit, the Scandinavian hostess's use of the word YES!, had an effect on my enjoyment. Very beautiful.
81
Ok, I must admit that I was going to scannnnnnndalously do this, but, I’m on a better purposeful path (or at least, I’m TRYYYYYYY-YINNNNNNNG to!). Though I resisted ... I failed, and ended-up giving-in to OCD and counting (with pepita seeds nonetheless) the number of times the interviewer said ‘yes’, as an extra. I didn’t include any alternates or substitutes (the word ‘okay’ shows itself very often as well), but just that one word, as a [bad] habit ... much if not entirely like mine own!
Annnnnnd, of course, I’m posting it. BUT, I do-so in good faith that anyone reading it will have a chuckle rather than send ire my way.
Ok, as you were.
And, no.... that isn’t my ‘thumbs down’ listed in the count. I rather enjoyed this podcast.
It's true: you're not on a better path. Just settle down in the cleavage and set your compulsion at ease.
You didn't post the results of your count......what are the numbers?
@@picassoboy52 you didn't read the post.
I have up at 4 min.
If she says 'yes', 'ok', or 'hmhm' one more time I'm gonna gouge out my own eyes.
I do appreciate constructive criticism and hope you can read my response without using braille. :-)
@@loislindstrom3717 Nothing amusing about your style.
The name Caravaggio is properly pronounced Cara VAH Jo
No E sound after the G
You're right. But you shouldn't expect human beings to be perfect in any one thing, especially in the pronunciation of foreign names. If that's going irritate you, you're in for a life of pure hell
@@picassoboy52 -
I don't expect people to be perfect.
I am not irritated.
I don't understand your giggling at things not intended to be funny. Comments about others tragedy n suffering, make you laugh. What's wrong with you....
Gsutavo
ADDING TO THE COMMENTS BELOW...I HATE WHEN THE AUTHORITIES PONTIFICATE. THE BEST DOC ON CARAVAGGIO I KNOW ABOUT IS ROBERT HUGHES.
I’m not a Dixon fan, Robert Hughes absolutely brilliant, sadly no longer with us.
What an irritating interviewer.
I knew, through my landlord in the late 1960s to beginning of the 1970s, an extraordinary and deeply trouble painter, an gay, dapper artist named Erick (or Erik or Erich) Schnickwald, who seems to have ended up totally forgotten. Schnickwald's life was very irregular; he seemed to be obsessed by the demonic in a disturbing way; and his art, gorgeously executed, featured endless elements of fire, blood, and suffering, maybe downright Hellish. He is about the type, perhaps, that Caravaggio was in his own way. The last that I saw of Eric was by chance on the street, by then poor, working in a menial job, and, as ever, despairing. His fey personal beauty, too, disappeared in sags and a paunch.
...and this relates to Caravaggio how?
What does any of that have to do with this
well, give the lady some credit, its not so bad is it
CHEAPO TABLE
What the hell does that have to do with the price of tea in china??
Was he gay?
No,he wasnt. Others may have been. Michelangelo was probably despite no conclusive evidence that he was sexually active. Da Vinci on the other hand was gay