My father, a Master Sergeant in the Argentine Air Force, was one of the last mechanics to work on the B-10s when he was just beginning his career. Greetings from Patagonia Argentina.
My Dad flew anti-sub patrol in B-10s as a bombardier before being sent to Europe in '44. He said the B10 was perfect for the purpose because they had a very, very low stall speed and the nose turret afforded a really good view for the observer/bombardier. Low and slow was just the thing for that particular mission.
I can see features used on DC 3, B-17, and future large military aircraft. I’m constantly in awe of the 747 ability to fly at the weight, and gracefully
I knew a smoke jumper that said they had a old ford Tri star and when they looked down at the ground on the way to fires they could see cars on the I-5 driving faster than they were flying.
There is only one example left at the Air Force Museum at Wright-Patterson AFB. Searching for one to restore, the one they found had been used as a chicken coop in Argentina.
The German Zeppelin Stakken Ee20 of 1920 was an all metal, 4 engine. Monoplane that was designed as a bomber, but delivered as an airliner has a place in history.
I was all ready to do a gotcha and say you said mono plane where clearly it had to have been a bi plane in 1920 but you were RIGHT! Fascinating story if you want to Google it. It was ordered to be destroyed by the allies out of fear it would lead to war plane development which it could have! Who knows, maybe WW2 could have started in 1929 instead of 10 years later if not for that decision. FYI don't rely on Wickepedia for info on the designer as for some reason the articles focus mainly on the companies he founded or worked for. Other postings indicate that he was anti Nazi and was forced to commit suicide in 1939. He had even moved his company to the U.S. but was unable to get any orders.
Pet peeve I have is when the thumbnail image does not match the actual subject of the video. Here you have some sort of single engine aircraft as your thumbnail wheras the B10 is 2 engine aircraft. I tried to figure out what is was but gave up but then I found another viewer pointed out that is was a Consolidated XP 81 circa 1946. Why do so many Ytubers do this? It's not as if there were no images of an actual B 10 to choose from. Just saying.
@@j.pershing2197 Planes of the 20s and early 30s were largely hand built by craftsmen and machinists with abilities that just don't exist anymore. My granfather was disabled, so he wasn't drafted in WW2, but he made torpedoes. He was a master machinist and his tools were something between jewelers and a surgeon's tools! Those torpedoes' internal components looked like the finest watches in existence...a hundred tiny gears and splines.
@@trevor5290me too, not sure what plane it is, but definitely not a Blenheim. But the uploader can set multiple thumbnails (or change it, I don't know) so different people can see different thumbnails.
I'm a whiskers breadth away from 60 years old, I've spent my entire life geeking out on warbirds of every type and classification, and somehow, I have been oblivious to this one up to this last 15 minutes. SMH
Can any one tell me what the aircraft is in the thumbnail. It looks to either be a single engine turbo prop or a jet and reciprocating combination of engines. Sadly it was not mentioned in the video at all.
Why does an article about the Martin B-10 have a title thumbnail rear view of the Convair XP-81? An another omission was ignoring the Boeing X/Y B-9, a metal monoplane with retractable undercarriage, of course Boeing had been a fighter maker to that time.
@@mikepalmer1971 He was actually a bombardier not a pilot. He also flew with the 5th Air Force during WWII. He was a bombardier in B-17’s and B-24’s. Once he completed his 25 missions he rotated home to train new crews. He eventually went to the pacific and was in B-29’s. He would stay in the B-29 through the Korean War. He did briefly fly in the B-36 before he retired as a CWO.
@@allthefoolssailedaway oh wow he was in the B-36. That is really cool as well. It sounds like he led a very interesting life indeed. I am glad he came back from all that ok.
In its Time , I guess it was the Equivalent of a B-1 Lancer or Tu-160 White Swan . Bomber FASTER than the Interceptors that chase it . Looks a bit " Jules Verne " or Steampunk by todays standards , but hey , It Was The B -17 that replaced it . Remarkable Legacy .
It's interesting that the video and the thumbnail have absolutely nothing to do with each other, particularly when the aircraft in the thumbnail is the one which caused the problems with ground crews.
Interesting, Argentina gifted the last B-10 to the USA exactly 12 years to the day before I was born and when I was 12 was the height of my fascination with aircraft design.
As a business owner, I'll bet that aircraft company I never heard of really made a ton of money during that time and were so thrilled that their design won. I only hope if they had designers they rewarded them for their work.
Surprised you never heard of the Martin company. They made 4 different bomber aircraft that participated in WWII. Then participated in a bomber competition with the XB-51.Lost. And license built the B-57 bomber that fought in Vietnam. A rather prolific company. P.S. Their B-26 Marauder had the lowest loss rate of any medium bomber in the ETO. My uncle was an armorer on them.
Martin did a lot of work for the Navy as well, producing the PBM Mariner, and JRM Mars flying boats. Martin set up a factory in Nebraska to build B-29s and ended up producing 531 of them, including all of the Silverplate B-29s such as Enola Gay and Bockscar.
FYI, your thumbnail pic is of a Consolidated-Vultee XP-81 from 1945-'47. They were mixed power Merlin/turbojet and turboprop/turbojet escort fighter prototypes. The XP-81's are very interesting aircraft in their own right but they have nothing to do with Martin bombers of the '30's. Just saying.
Be advised, youtube is forcing us to either join at $13.99 a month or endure the repetitious ads. I live on my VA disability and I can't afford that. So I probably won't be here much longer.
Pretty much not true, they advertise their premium services as do almost every product, but I do hope your situation gets better king 💯💪 just reject the offers and continue about your business , RUclips will always be free they just entice you with added benefits like removing the ads and downloading your favorite videos to watch without Internet or data , but just reject the offers and keep on about your business king 😎💪
CRAZY they went!!! It IS the CRAZIEST EVER, so CRAZY it’s CRASIER than ALL the other CRAZIEST things EVER thought to be CRAZY!!! (The hyperbole of the title is a warning that the content is fluff).
It carried on a stiff resistance by the Dutch in Indonesia… Maybe whatshisname could learn how to say simple words like “Malaya” while practicing his Serling-surrogate delivery.
My dad, a Staggerwing Beech owner, said that when the B-10 flew by the reviewing stand, Walter Beech flew his Staggerwing down and past it, showing how his civilian airplane could fly faster than the bomber and taking the wind out of B-10 display.
Too bad the Republicans didn't have any in the Spanish Civil War. It might have made a difference. On the other hand, the Bf 109 might have made short work of it.
i've seen a yb-10 in a museum in china. apparently it was used for a time by the ROC airforce , and some airframes were abandoned. it must be one of the ugliest planes in history though..
a little tip to improve ur videos, dont make so many asmr noises while talking bc it makes the whole video unwatchable. dont get me wrong your content is interesting i just cant stand all the saliva noises u make when u talk
I am sorry Merkins but other country's were working on this at the same time. Sorry Merkkin MAGA but other country's still exist. Hail Grump great leader. By the it's just as anoying to hesr other country's miss pronounced not just Skaat lin .
My father, a Master Sergeant in the Argentine Air Force, was one of the last mechanics to work on the B-10s when he was just beginning his career. Greetings from Patagonia Argentina.
I think it was a great looking aircraft for its day!
@@Euragone68 I agree! It only had the problem of falling between 2 very relevant eras of aviation and not belonging to either of them.
It's funny because the only surviving one came from your country. I see it when I walk through the museum in my town. Greetings from Ohio
My Dad flew anti-sub patrol in B-10s as a bombardier before being sent to Europe in '44. He said the B10 was perfect for the purpose because they had a very, very low stall speed and the nose turret afforded a really good view for the observer/bombardier. Low and slow was just the thing for that particular mission.
Glen L. Martin of the past became Lockheed Martin today.
A legendary American company!
Semper Paratus.
The innovative legendary B 10 deserves it's long forgotten due. Thanks DS.
The Martins were used extensively for sub patrols along the east coast and gulf coast. The front glass turret was perfect for observation.
As an old aviation buff, I knew of this Martin B-10, but had no idea of its WWII accomplishments.
Same here. I am particularly surprised by its role in the Malaya and Singapore campaign.
I can see features used on DC 3, B-17, and future large military aircraft. I’m constantly in awe of the 747 ability to fly at the weight, and gracefully
I have had the pleasure of seeing that B-10 @ Wright Pat many times. She's a real beauty in blue.
Yet another incredible aircraft that I have never heard of! Thanks for continuing to bring to our attention these much needed aircraft!
Have been to Wright-Patterson several times and the B-10 is one of the jewels on display
That B-10 is the only one in existence I believe and it was gifted to the museum by the government of Argentina.
@@Snake-ms7sjyep she’s the last one left and did come from Argentina
Dark Skies never disappoints.
Dang, your scripts are eloquent and keep getting better, not to mention all the research. Great content.
Why is the plane in the thumb different?
The Martin B10 was also equally blessed by it's ability to back off the throttle, for the miles.
always loved the expression, "It (plane being discussed) has long legs."
@@NVRAMboi had Martin given the bomber a sharp and down turned leading edge, it could have gone hundreds of miles further.
Beautiful story thanks for Sharing it👍
Excellent documentary, as usual from Dark Skies
Well done docu-video. Thanks.
I knew a smoke jumper that said they had a old ford Tri star and when they looked down at the ground on the way to fires they could see cars on the I-5 driving faster than they were flying.
even Soerjadi Soerjadarma, the first Indonesian Air Force Chief of Staff was a navigator in the ML-KNIL's B-10
I have seen this aircraft many times, it is a nice looking aircraft in person, I can see why it was favored.
There is only one example left at the Air Force Museum at Wright-Patterson AFB. Searching for one to restore, the one they found had been used as a chicken coop in Argentina.
The German Zeppelin Stakken Ee20 of 1920 was an all metal, 4 engine. Monoplane that was designed as a bomber, but delivered as an airliner has a place in history.
I was all ready to do a gotcha and say you said mono plane where clearly it had to have been a bi plane in 1920 but you were RIGHT! Fascinating story if you want to Google it. It was ordered to be destroyed by the allies out of fear it would lead to war plane development which it could have! Who knows, maybe WW2 could have started in 1929 instead of 10 years later if not for that decision. FYI don't rely on Wickepedia for info on the designer as for some reason the articles focus mainly on the companies he founded or worked for. Other postings indicate that he was anti Nazi and was forced to commit suicide in 1939. He had even moved his company to the U.S. but was unable to get any orders.
Pet peeve I have is when the thumbnail image does not match the actual subject of the video. Here you have some sort of single engine aircraft as your thumbnail wheras the B10 is 2 engine aircraft. I tried to figure out what is was but gave up but then I found another viewer pointed out that is was a Consolidated XP 81 circa 1946. Why do so many Ytubers do this? It's not as if there were no images of an actual B 10 to choose from. Just saying.
There is one in the wetlands off what was the end of the runway at the now closed Hamilton AFB in Northern California
The 20s-30s in military aerospace tech is highly understudied.
It took 20 yrs and millions of dollars to rebuild one of those early aircrafts. I found that interesting how quickly we lost those techniques
@@j.pershing2197
Planes of the 20s and early 30s were largely hand built by craftsmen and machinists with abilities that just don't exist anymore. My granfather was disabled, so he wasn't drafted in WW2, but he made torpedoes. He was a master machinist and his tools were something between jewelers and a surgeon's tools! Those torpedoes' internal components looked like the finest watches in existence...a hundred tiny gears and splines.
@@fazole
They forget about those types of people dont they. Much of my family was Navy. Lost arts are prevalent now days. Cheers to him and u.
I too thought it had never fought in WWII.
Looks like thumbnail and title were meant for the xp81
The thumbnail looks more like a Bristol Blenheim.
@@clivestainlesssteelwomble7665 the Blenheim has 2 engines, 1 in each wing. The thumbnail is literally the xp81 that uses a prop and a jet.
@@clivestainlesssteelwomble7665 then we don't see the same thumbnail. The one I see reminded me of a Ryan Fireball seen from the back.
@ngoTheGreat Im seeing the XP81 and I found the thumbnail photo on Wiki about the xp81 ;)
@@trevor5290me too, not sure what plane it is, but definitely not a Blenheim. But the uploader can set multiple thumbnails (or change it, I don't know) so different people can see different thumbnails.
That era was unbelievable (globally) for aviation development.
I'm a whiskers breadth away from 60 years old,
I've spent my entire life geeking out on warbirds of every type and classification, and somehow,
I have been oblivious to this one up to this last 15 minutes.
SMH
The B-12 found a new life as a useful in fact vital vitamin. 😉
I was aware of this airplane, but, not of its impressive record.Thank you!
@9:30 -- you're talking about the Royal Thai Air Force, but the pictures are clearly from the U.S. Army Air Corps.
hey, at least they were of b-10s and not a completely different aircraft.
Can any one tell me what the aircraft is in the thumbnail. It looks to either be a single engine turbo prop or a jet and reciprocating combination of engines. Sadly it was not mentioned in the video at all.
The B10 nose turret looked abit odd, good visability one would feel a bit vunrable up front.
So why show the Douglas XB42 MixMaster in the title page?
XB-42 had pusher props, so that's not the picture.
But I don't recognize what it is...?
Someone else recognized it as a XP-81.
Around 8:30 the British Blenheim bomber is mentioned. It is pronounced “blenim”.
Reminds me of the nose of the later Lancaster and other similar aircraft. Vary interesting video thanks
I can't imagine walking into an aviation museum and thinking, "Yeah, I flew that, and that....oh there's another I've flown."
Indeed
It never ceases to amaze me me how much money and effort was expended on projects that provided so little in the way of bang for the buck.
Not necessarily true. It was another stepping stone in technology. I’m sure valuable lessons were learned.
So, the thumbnail has nothing to do with the actual video?
Why does an article about the Martin B-10 have a title thumbnail rear view of the Convair XP-81? An another omission was ignoring the Boeing X/Y B-9, a metal monoplane with retractable undercarriage, of course Boeing had been a fighter maker to that time.
That wonderful that they restored that aircraft.
T. 5, not T. V (the Dutch used Roman numerals).
This was the first bomber my grandfather flew in the Army air corps.
Very cool. I bet he had some interesting stories to tell from his life.
@@mikepalmer1971 oh yes! He was a WWII and Korean War vet!
@@allthefoolssailedaway What all did he fly of you don’t mind me asking?
@@mikepalmer1971 He was actually a bombardier not a pilot. He also flew with the 5th Air Force during WWII. He was a bombardier in B-17’s and B-24’s. Once he completed his 25 missions he rotated home to train new crews. He eventually went to the pacific and was in B-29’s. He would stay in the B-29 through the Korean War. He did briefly fly in the B-36 before he retired as a CWO.
@@allthefoolssailedaway oh wow he was in the B-36. That is really cool as well. It sounds like he led a very interesting life indeed. I am glad he came back from all that ok.
Never knew any of this. Thanks for the video.
What’s the plane in the thumbnail? It’s not a b10
Thankyou Great Presentation
That must have been something... a bomber that could outperform (or at least outrun) the fighters of its day.
Glad to see the B-10 making it here ... looking forward to the B-9 "Death Angel" and B-18 Bolo some day too.
In its Time , I guess it was the Equivalent of a B-1 Lancer or Tu-160 White Swan . Bomber FASTER than the Interceptors that chase it .
Looks a bit " Jules Verne " or Steampunk by todays standards , but hey , It Was The B -17 that replaced it . Remarkable Legacy .
One of those crash landed here in Rhinelander Wisconsin while on a goodwill tour. The picture of the crash is in the city library.
I always thought the B-10 looked like a beluga whale.
It's interesting that the video and the thumbnail have absolutely nothing to do with each other, particularly when the aircraft in the thumbnail is the one which caused the problems with ground crews.
So why is the thumbnail a British Bristol Blenheim?
Apparently your thumbnail is different than mine.
My thumbnail shows something with a single prop engine , what looks like jet exhaust in back and tricycle landing gear
@@patrickgriffitt6551Looks like the thumbnail has now changed, I’ve never posted a video so I didn’t know it was possible after the initial upload.
i saw a b-10
@@outinthesticks1035 Same. A Convair XP-81 I think.
Fighter plane technology quickly caught up.
Martin's is about 1/2 hour from me. It's a National Guard base and museum now.
So, how exactly did it drive everyone crazy?
Interesting video even though the aircraft shown before clicking in has nothing to do with this video.
Interesting, Argentina gifted the last B-10 to the USA exactly 12 years to the day before I was born and when I was 12 was the height of my fascination with aircraft design.
As a business owner, I'll bet that aircraft company I never heard of really made a ton of money during that time and were so thrilled that their design won. I only hope if they had designers they rewarded them for their work.
Surprised you never heard of the Martin company. They made 4 different bomber aircraft that participated in WWII. Then participated in a bomber competition with the XB-51.Lost. And license built the B-57 bomber that fought in Vietnam. A rather prolific company. P.S. Their B-26 Marauder had the lowest loss rate of any medium bomber in the ETO. My uncle was an armorer on them.
Martin Marietta and or Lockheed Martin may ring more of a bell. They merged with other companies and did a lot of work with NASA .
Martin did a lot of work for the Navy as well, producing the PBM Mariner, and JRM Mars flying boats. Martin set up a factory in Nebraska to build B-29s and ended up producing 531 of them, including all of the Silverplate B-29s such as Enola Gay and Bockscar.
FYI, your thumbnail pic is of a Consolidated-Vultee XP-81 from 1945-'47. They were mixed power Merlin/turbojet and turboprop/turbojet escort fighter prototypes. The XP-81's are very interesting aircraft in their own right but they have nothing to do with Martin bombers of the '30's. Just saying.
why didnt u put a B-10 in the thumbnail
Might be irritating but I’m not giving it up learning too much
How’d it compare to the German planes at the same time.
Be advised, youtube is forcing us to either join at $13.99 a month or endure the repetitious ads. I live on my VA disability and I can't afford that. So I probably won't be here much longer.
Pretty much not true, they advertise their premium services as do almost every product, but I do hope your situation gets better king 💯💪 just reject the offers and continue about your business , RUclips will always be free they just entice you with added benefits like removing the ads and downloading your favorite videos to watch without Internet or data , but just reject the offers and keep on about your business king 😎💪
Disgusting that this is now how we live.
Frankly exiting RUclips seems ever more attractive to me. If you quit, make sure the fans can find you.
I'm not paying, just to still be annoyed by ads I can't skip!😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
You can't afford
Even though it’s innovation as an all metal bomber it reminds me of a large insect with that bulbous turret in its nose. 😳
you have many metal aircrafts or were there many inflatable and wooden aircrafts in those days?
The P-40 and Hurricane had some fabric coverings.
Never saw this aircraft! Thanks!
A U-Boat menace during the Battle of the Atlantic.
I love the hilarious mispronunciations.
CRAZY they went!!! It IS the CRAZIEST EVER, so CRAZY it’s CRASIER than ALL the other CRAZIEST things EVER thought to be CRAZY!!! (The hyperbole of the title is a warning that the content is fluff).
I rarely make negative comments but this plane is not very aesthetically pleasing... 😮
Understating it a bit 😂
A BRISTOL BLENHEIM?
I have seen it IN PERSON at the Air Force Museum.
Why the click bait thumbnail?
I'm more interested in newer, more exotic aircraft; but all of the Dark channels are a pleasure to watch.
It carried on a stiff resistance by the Dutch in Indonesia…
Maybe whatshisname could learn how to say simple words like “Malaya” while practicing his Serling-surrogate delivery.
I reside in Dayton, Ohio and been to U.S.A.F. museum quite a few times. I've seen many of the planes depicted on Dark Skies including the B-10.
One clickbait title too many
My dad, a Staggerwing Beech owner, said that when the B-10 flew by the reviewing stand, Walter Beech flew his Staggerwing down and past it, showing how his civilian airplane could fly faster than the bomber and taking the wind out of B-10 display.
Can you do a video on the mixed propulsion xf15c?
Funny looking
Too bad the Republicans didn't have any in the Spanish Civil War. It might have made a difference. On the other hand, the Bf 109 might have made short work of it.
i've seen a yb-10 in a museum in china. apparently it was used for a time by the ROC airforce , and some airframes were abandoned. it must be one of the ugliest planes in history though..
everything but pretty
It is interesting if true. Purportedly he was a pacifists. He had to have his arm twisted to build war materials.
Great work 😅 Two videos on my channel hypothesize the chance MH370 successfully ditched in the southern Indian Ocean. Let me know what you think 👍
nearly all ww2 american bombers were metal.
the Beluga whale bomber.
Had as much glass as an AMC Pacer , but I see its appealments . Rakish , even now .
ugly enough to be the warthog's mother in law
"Sleek aircraft"? 🤣
It seems if there is a way to mispronounce something - Malay, Blenheim - you will do it.
Metal or Mental ? 🤪
a little tip to improve ur videos, dont make so many asmr noises while talking bc it makes the whole video unwatchable. dont get me wrong your content is interesting i just cant stand all the saliva noises u make when u talk
Now that's ugly
another dumb title
I thought the same thing when i read your handle😂😂😂
Normally you examine the subject you're criticizing, you apparently didn't do any of that. How about your title?
Repetitous as always.
This exemplifies The Military Industrial Complex WASTE!!!!
I am sorry Merkins but other country's were working on this at the same time.
Sorry Merkkin MAGA but other country's still exist.
Hail Grump great leader.
By the it's just as anoying to hesr other country's miss pronounced not just Skaat lin .