First Focal Plane vs Second Focal Plane | 9-Hole Reviews

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 9 янв 2025

Комментарии • 8

  • @GldenRetriever
    @GldenRetriever 11 месяцев назад +1

    The answer to this question is dual focal plane. The only cost to it, is well... cost lol.
    Love my March 1.5-15x. German #4 posts with a fiber wire center dot on the SFP, but the grid is FFP. Nothing to hate about it in regards to the reticle.

  • @alliwantisfinancialstabili7414
    @alliwantisfinancialstabili7414 4 месяца назад

    This video explained it really well for me, I've watched a few videos on LPVO's and FFP/SFP but never quite understood it. But this video really helped me.

  • @farklestaxbaum4945
    @farklestaxbaum4945 2 месяца назад

    A lot of people will portray FFP as hands-down better, but it really comes down to the specific scope, reticle and use case. While it sounds good to be able to mil at any magnification level, FFP introduces other issues. I have a FFP Meopta Optika, 3-18x50mm. Its a great scope, but you cant even see the numbers on the reticle until about 8x or higher because they are so small. And when you crank it all the way up to 18x, the bottom quarter of the reticle is cut off because its zoomed in so far.

  • @bossdawg165
    @bossdawg165 9 месяцев назад +2

    First one to explain it to make sense to me

  • @alvinkey4591
    @alvinkey4591 2 месяца назад

    Primary Arms PLxC 1-8 FFP KILLS the reticle game at both 1x and 8x for anyone interested.

  • @col.cottonhill6655
    @col.cottonhill6655 11 месяцев назад

    I was actually looking up videos on this earlier. How weird.

  • @littlebitofeverything652
    @littlebitofeverything652 11 месяцев назад

    Id rather have the third plane

  • @unclejj509
    @unclejj509 11 месяцев назад

    I'm #1 whewwwwwwwwwww