McMurtry Spéirling Pure tackles Laguna Seca and... the Corkscrew
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 13 сен 2024
- The Goodwood Hill record-holder still never fails to blow our minds. The McMurtry Spéirling was followed by the track weapon available to the public, the Pure. When you see a car with this much performance tackle a track like Laguna Seca, it really starts to put it into perspective.
#McMurtry #LagunaSeca #MontereyReunion #gwflatout #SpeirlingPure #McMurtrySpeirlingPure #Corkscrew
Official Website 👉 www.goodwood.co...
Facebook 👉 / goodwoodrrc
Instagram 👉 / goodwoodrrc
Twitter 👉 / goodwoodrrc
SUBSCRIBE for more racing cars, supercars, new car reviews, historic motorsport and Goodwood event coverage 👉 bit.ly/GoodwoodTV
Buy your Goodwood Event tickets 👉 bit.ly/GWBuyTic...
Commentator: "It's absolutely silent"
Car: sounds like a fighter jet doing a fly-by
Commentator: quarter mile time of "9.7 s" and "9.97 s"
Car: 7.97 s
Exactly this! Worst commentator ever!
It uses race electricity instead of regular house electricity.
@@Just_Another_Sunday idk if you being sarcastic or what,, but what’s the difference?
Obviously.
Race electricity is 1.21 jigawatts at 88 hz
😂
@@mr.lemonade3742 Race electricity has more amps and more volts and fewer ohms.
This car is like the bullshit car you could unlock with cheats in old racing games.
yeah haha
The Gameshark special
Lolol the most elucidative explaining ever to why this bouquers exisits.
It can only do this cause it does not fit in any other race class ever. Videogame cheat car lolol
@@festol1 They had the Chapparel 2J's in one of the American prototype groups back in 1970, but banned it due to some issue with movable skirts or ducts on the fans, after it was too fast for the other cars.
I'd guess as well that slipstreaming one of these fan cars would be difficult.
The El Nino from NFS Hot Pursuit 2.
Lap time 1:18 min. aprox.
Around 6sec faster than the Koenigsegg Jesko while running at 80% power! It is a track car only but still impressive.
@@Gryffins90 you are clueless '80%' power
BHAHAHAH you think it would go faster with 100%
clueless bozo
@@Gryffins90 and how many laps can do ?
@@vitaonetKS according to their chart, around 7min at this "Hypercar" setting (80% power, 100% downforce)
This is considerably slower thank an Indy car.
Wow its glued to the road! Its flying upside down
Side to side
Like a rollercoaster
This thing blows my mind every time I see it.
That's what she said
The McMurtry Spéirling fan car has achieved an independently measured 0-60mph in 1.40s and 1/4mile (400m) in 7.97s
402+
I get the feeling the "commentator" usually does bowling tournaments, and was filling in here, trying to sound "well-informed".
That is just bonkers through the corkscrew....
Look at how much speed it carries through the Andretti hairpin! The low speed downforce on this car is nutty.
commentator straight out of the 'waffling' playbook - the landed gentry love it, everyone else finds it supremely annoying
The 1/4 was 7.9 in the Original Speirling. Surely this is still around that and not the 9 seconds you quoted ?
Well he's certain it's somewhere between 1.4 and 9.8.
Almost everything the commentator said was wrong.
100% he got it wrong!
When he said 9.7, perhaps he meant to say 7.9
@@higurro How does one get that confused? But I understand your theory 👍🏼
The story tells the same thing about electric powered vehicles, no stamina. Gets weaker for every lap. That’s main difference between a power source that has full/active chemical reaction before being discharge versus a power source where chemical reaction is contained and delivered to another reaction with air and ignition, it last longer.
@@curvetrcalinga For now. Battery tech used in cars is still ancient, all the research over last ten years should start making it's way onto production lines in about... (More)
@@ProjectVRD you’re probably dead when that energy density matches diesel and gasoline. The basic physics and chemistry doesn’t change. It needs a power source that has a strong molecular bond. Make di lithium crystal a reality.
It is chemical reaction too in the battery. It is just reversible, which combustion really isn't, not without using way more energy than you got out of it in the first place. Because it has to be reversible, that is what makes it "inefficient".
The commentator is just winging it with waffle. The generated down force is the most important thing but he barely mentioned it. Just open Google on your phone man.
He also said 0-60 in 1.4 which I find hard to believe.
So what was the lap time? I've just sat here listening to someone prattling on thinking that I was going to learn something, and absolutely nothing, zip, zilch, zero.
You still learned that you learned nothing. Which negates my sentence then. Dayummm xD
Have to do the old fashioned way and either read the comments or do it yourself and time the damn thing approximately with the video ^^
Yep, this is some baaaaad video production right here.
I got 1 minute 19 seconds from 1:05 to 2:24
Scintillating commentary lol
@@acptelford1307 British people
@@novai6554 Was he not whooping and hollering enough for you?
IMSA fast lap at Laguna Seca this year: 1:12 (Cadillac). The current GTP cars don’t have the horsepower/torque/aero downforce of the past.
Yeah and the Spierling sadly only did a 1:18 and the K-egg Jesko (production and road legal) did a 1:24.
And the slowest F1 car currently, can probably do a 59 sec lap.
2:36 when the car becomes an A-10 warthog
When Mcmurtry Spéirling Pure become A-10 Warthog be like:
Going fast over those curbs ....
High time they got a different commentator. Too much waffle and too many inaccuracies. Hard to listen to
This commentator got the info all wrong
That thing is absolutely flying through the corners.
from @1:05 to the 2:24 mark,
that was a fast lap
@@jamdc2000 isn’t that faster Then the product car record the jesko just set
@@cristinogavarrete3974 yeah, but mcmurty is not production street legal car
@@areenbhalekar949 They are making a road legal one. Dont think it would count as a production car but
Thats about the same territory as the valkyrie amr pro, only the valkyrie was 2 passenger on board and 800hp settings
@@F1dude. this one that made the record is not road legal though
Always breathtaking to watch.
what was the time??
Quarter past two. 🕰️
Timed the second lap on my phone at around 1:18.3
I know isn't that the whole point. I suspect it makes that recently posted Jesko time look slow.
Made to compete at the 24 minutes of LeMans...
No, it doesn't have the range
@@tomlusty8376 lol 😂😂👏🏼
U mean 2.4 mins
It crossed the line at 1 min 6 seconds ish, and crossed again at around 2 mins 24 seconds. Thats like 1 minute 18 which is 6-7 seconds faster than the Jesko. Very impressive but the 919 Evo did it in 1 min 7 and a F2003 F1 car did it in 1 min 3. A modern F1 car would get around in under a minute on C5 tires.
I do wish the commentator would get his figures right it's ss 1/4 mile is under 8 sec !
But in this configuration its running at 80% power, which gives it a slower 1/4 mile.
@@Stuka87Not a slower 0-60?
@@Cloxxki If the 0-60 is traction limited, it may be similar. Or they quoted an adjusted time for one spec, but not the other. 🤷♂
It's got a suction fan underneath it that you can see in some of the views of the car. That's one of the reasons it's stuck to the ground around the corners and doesn't really slide around.
Stumbling commentary and 25fps chopper shots. Come on, Goodwood!!
That’s one fast vacuum cleaner! It’s amazing to watch.
Didn’t Koenigsegg uploaded a video of the record lap of Laguna seca ?
@@Matthias-499 indeed
Indeed
The Pure was around 6 seconds faster than that Jesko run. Problem is how they are judged as timed laps. The Jesko took record for homologated production during a private event being timed.
@@benwu7980 And this fan car isn't a homologated production car. This is a prototype.
@@mtnvalley9298 As far as I know, it's not the prototype, but the production track car.
So what time did it do? aaargh
People estimate it is +- 1.18.5
It’s a quick car, but it’s just not right to be able to hear a parked car alarm over the car itself 1:34. I’ll take a thunderous or screaming ICE over this any day.
🤡🤡
That's great we have the choice now)
Simply phenomenal, and I've got news for the narrator - it does make a bewitching sound !
If Laguna Seca included a wide 1 km start-finish straight, It would be an exciting venue for Formula 1.
Can’t hear it? Finally, someone deafer than I.
@@noseeum6385 everything is relative.
id love to watch a series of these racing.
That looked fun through the Corkscrew!
...and the official lap time was.........................? 🤔
1 min 18. 6 seconds faster than then the Jesko
Every time I see this car, I don't know whether to be blown away by how fast it is, or disgusted at how hideously repulsive it looks.
Who on here thinks it looks fine....
I hope the commentator can improve a bit next time.
It changed color at the end.
It started driving away from you
@@jasonettorre7114 There's 2 of them on the track.
It grips so hard, the earth started rotating backwards
@@jasonettorre7114 red shifted.
Poor choice of camera angles - switching too soon away from the entry into the Corkscrew :(
When you need your racetrack cleaned ... in a hurry!
This would've been a lot better without the overhead drone shots which ruined any sense of the speed of this car! 🙄
And to think, it accidentally broke a record and the car was only using its fans and motors at half its normal power. 50% of its power and accidentally broke a track record.
Now imagine it running at 100% for the motors and the fans. Imagine what other records it can break……
Interesting demonstration but absolutely useless as a real car.
Why??? Go faster round a track than pretty much anything else on the planet for a few laps, then come in for a well earned rest. That ticks a lot of boxes for the right owner.
It's not a real car, it's a prototype...still
@@Mikeyboofboof'anything else on the planet' yeah calm down buddy, its probably as fast as an lmp1 car on 100% power, nowhere near f1 speeds.
Quarter mile: 7.97, NOT 9.79.
Beautiful
Lap time about 1:19.2 - how good is this?
I'd love to see it go flat out around the high speed oval at Talladega. Boogedy..boogedy!! 😂
Hah! I knew it could go under 1:10, called it like my mom on her birthday.
I wish we could see the car running 100% power and suction and lower the best times so much!!! I’m sure with 100% and max speed at 175mph instead of 155mph it would do easily 2-3sec faster
@@Butterfly5657 I think this was 100% on the suction and 80% on power. The extra 20% power wouldn’t change lap time as much as being able to run full downforce. They likely had to turn it down to be able to run multiple laps with it.
They said they use 80% of power and suction n their last track and they have to try harder when the car is finalised
In UK where they tried it they said 80% to 100% is big difference apparently
I don’t know if they used more suction for that track and I heard the speaker saying 185mph but I never seen the car going faster than 160mph
What's the lap time?
just wonder if it works on a wet track too?
Lap time? Carwow confirmed the quarter mile is 7.9.
Well it was a regular version that goes 150 MPH limited but this version Pure is different
They should run one at LeMans. Would probably need about 143 pit stops to swap fresh batteries and blistered tires.
Then how many do they need a spéirling, it only 100 until to produce build like only last 7 minutes of full charge and 4 hours to recharge
@@sandiegomathewp.7456 It would be a pointless spectacle.
The driver should be turning off the fans to decrease down and allowing for faster acceleration on the straights!
Amazing, the narrator ran out of facts and repeated them three times in a 3-min video. Goodwood really can’t find anyone who knows cars to talk?
Not only that, but almost all the 'facts' were wrong.
It looks like an lmp car squished sideways. Always so weird to see.
Its running a bit rich, its burning so much oil. All that smoke the whole length of the track. They should tune it better! (Razzing)
The way it corners doesn't even seem possible.
It weight 1 ton kg and 1k hp means 1 power to weight ratio and 2 ton of force and Mcmurtry want to build a electric fan car on track faster than most production car
Is that dust or smoke or something else at corner exit.
Its hilarious, there's a clean line everywhere the car goes on the teack all the while trying to rip your face off going around the corners.
Wonder why the car didn't break the Nordschleife record? Well, it's battery can barely last one lap of Nordschleife at LMP2 pace.
Because short battery wasn't enough to go Nurburgring
If it's so fast why does it need rearview mirrors?
Why is he so bloody wide every corner/apex?
British automotive engineering is world leading and this is proven time and time again
Yep, BAE can make one of anything, but a production run of anything quality anymore?
1:18-1:19ish
@@paulgolff4996 oops)))
Slower than an indycar
Simply the most badazz vehicle ever built, as of now.....
But what is the range?
I think it could run like this for seven minutes. No bueno.
@@christophejergales7852 You mean not even enough to do groceries?
@@wetlandweasel nah, I'm sure it can make it to the store. Haha. Running at full whack drains the battery quicker.
That thing sounds like a jet engine, compare it to something like The GE-90 in the 777
how dirty is that track look at that rooster tail of dust
7.9 in the quarter mile
Echos of the Chaparral sucker car but unable to do more than a few laps and those at steadily decreasing speeds. It is impressive but has but the one party trick.
"2 twin motors".....so 4 motors?
I love how England is finally winning and showing the world that there’s more to performance than German or American cars. 🇬🇧
All the lap times aside, it's one of the cutest looking cars ever
Whats the range?
@@patrickgriffitt6551 I suspect battery range is probably longer than most drivers could cope with driving it for!
Oh my. So fast through Rainy corner!
It’s almost cartoonish it’s so fast lol
This UFO does better than a 9.7 1/4mi. You can SEE it's faster than that. A Tesla Plaid does 9-9.3
It look like a Batmobil.
Murtry will conquer every circut
So a production McLaren (765LT) is faster over the standing 1/4 mile? Cant believe that
Not surprising, really. Electric vehicle typically struggle with top end speed. Combine that with the extra downforce, which also limits acceleration.
Commentator is an idiot and almost everything he said was wrong, This thing had done 7.97s quarter mile. And its acceleration is not limited by downforce because the downforce is generated by an enormous fan which the clueless commentator only mentioned in passing towards the end.
It's not the case. Commentator got the numbers wrong I think this does the 1/4 in about 7.9
@@kasheppard503the extra downforce massively helps acceleration from a standing start
@@invASIAN95 yep, that sounds right. Can't believe Goodwood Festival channel would broadcast such inaccuracies
Watched from the Corkscrew…it was like a silent jet falling from space.
Not sure whether the commentator has been in 1 too many champers hospitality suites..........but he sure as chuff sounds like he has. He needs to realise that the people watching these vids, we are all mostly car/stat/spec nerds so he really needs to step up and get his 1 job correct. If you please
My guess = His day job > mattress salesman
Wow not just one but 3 corkscrews in 3 minutes and change. Bananas
Well, we already knew it was quite quick...
Well, HOW QUICK WAS IT?
Yeah, that damn monster is a REAL thunderstorm!
🥱
Quarter mile under 8 surely.
After driving that thing so many times probably Max Chilton would feel a F1 car slow like a sedan
I saw an old Toyota F1 car run I believe 1:06 at Laguna years ago, so F1 is safe, at least where it can stretch its legs. Remarkable though!
This commentary is shocking. Sorry
It’s impressive, but too clinical and boring, no sense of occasion. The Jesko going around here was an entertaining watch 😌👌🏽
I wathched the spectators. Didnt see a single one move to the fence. Great tech but entertainment it is not.
And then 4 hours to recharge….
And commentator doesn't even mention the fan or downforce, just keeps banging on about 0-60... Ah well.
Am i the only guy who doesn’t like these cars?
It's too small not even a car
Camera man is rubbish
Yawn