Pro-Q 4 Vs Smart:EQ 4 | Best EQ Plugin

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 25 дек 2024

Комментарии •

  • @InspiredWithAC
    @InspiredWithAC  6 дней назад +3

    Let me know if you tried Pro-Q 4 yet or if you're sticking with Smart EQ:4

    • @chris_g_sls
      @chris_g_sls 6 дней назад +2

      I only use Fruity Parametric EQ 2 😅
      one day when I buy another EQ, I will buy Pro-Q 4 or 3. or 5 😁

    • @ABurg396
      @ABurg396 6 дней назад +2

      @@chris_g_slslove it. Parametric EQ 2 is still one of my fav stock EQs.

    • @InspiredWithAC
      @InspiredWithAC  6 дней назад +1

      @@ABurg396 agreed. Definitely can’t go wrong with it!

    • @ViN-EzL
      @ViN-EzL 6 дней назад +2

      @@InspiredWithAC I got Ableton EQ 8, just gonna wait for EQ 9
      Naw jk but I got the Sonible Essentials bundle for a hundo, so I figured that's a good deal. And I'm just trying the grouping feature now. Still want Pro Q 4 tho haha.
      The Smart Comp and Limit are good too.

    • @SampleFire
      @SampleFire 5 дней назад +1

      @@ViN-EzLYou’re gonna wait for that one extra band?

  • @Rhekluse
    @Rhekluse 4 дня назад +2

    Competition inspires innovation. I use the sonible smart series bc I can’t afford Pro-Q 4 yet but I’m super excited to see what sonible does for their next versions. I hope they expand upon the instruments & genre style lists, and add some transient & tonal EQing like the SplitEQ. Maybe a slightly refined U.I upgrade as well.

  • @dragmuzik
    @dragmuzik 5 дней назад +4

    Both are incredible.

  • @VELOPEMUSIC
    @VELOPEMUSIC 6 дней назад +3

    They're both super good!

    • @InspiredWithAC
      @InspiredWithAC  6 дней назад

      Absolutely. I use smart:EQ for group unmasking and Pro Q for general EQ. Thanks for watching.

  • @ketarii
    @ketarii 5 дней назад +2

    Toneboosters pro q can go all the way down to 5hz and do 6 q factor none others can do this

    • @InspiredWithAC
      @InspiredWithAC  5 дней назад

      Equalizer Pro? That’s a solid EQ (though if I recall correctly, the demo has annoying pop up). In regard to the 5hz range, I personally think 10hz is more than sufficient. Most musicians will cut or shelf around the 20-30hz. Going down to 5hz is great, but not a “make or break” feature in my opinion. Thanks for watching!

  • @vaiman7777
    @vaiman7777 5 дней назад

    I’m more torn than I started 😂
    Price difference is another factor.

    • @InspiredWithAC
      @InspiredWithAC  4 дня назад +1

      For sure the price is a big factor. My advice is to always wait for a sale and buy from online stores like JRR shop or AudioDeluxe where you can use their 10-15% off coupons even on sale products. Also, you can try buy/sell forums on KVR audio or knobcloud. Never buy plugins at full price.

  • @FireF1y644
    @FireF1y644 4 дня назад +1

    Q4 for me because Sonible interface loads sooooo slow

    • @InspiredWithAC
      @InspiredWithAC  4 дня назад

      😅 I actually had to reach out to the dev team earlier this year regarding some of the UI issues i was having on my machine. They’re pretty responsive.

  • @vroteg
    @vroteg 3 дня назад

    When I hear trap crap the last thing come to mind what EQ I want to use. I more thinking of if DAW can export directly to trash… PS: I’m so glad eq-4 don’t have AI. The best feature nowadays if plugin don’t have AI!

    • @InspiredWithAC
      @InspiredWithAC  3 дня назад

      I get you. I’m neither for or against AI. Some AI tools will be helpful and leave the creative control to people. Some will just flat out steal and recreate. Nonetheless, it’s here to stay whether we like it or not.

  • @bluematrix5001
    @bluematrix5001 5 дней назад

    Funny HOFA had many of these features more than 7 years ago

    • @MrDisrupta
      @MrDisrupta 5 дней назад +2

      What's hofa

    • @InspiredWithAC
      @InspiredWithAC  5 дней назад +2

      DynamicTilt or IQ-Series? Also, the problem with a lot of feature-rich EQs (plugins in general) is the overall UI and ease of use.

  • @Neekzu
    @Neekzu 4 дня назад

    Nice Video. But you really need to treat your room haha

    • @InspiredWithAC
      @InspiredWithAC  4 дня назад

      Thanks! Regarding the room, I debated doing some treatment but decided not to. Even though acoustic panels may reduce reflections, it won’t get rid of the phasing - so it won’t give me a fully accurate sound. I found that doing the final mix on headphones gives me good enough results. I know that’s a controversial statement, but using reference tracks, proper headphones, and tools like sonarworks SoundID is quite sufficient in my opinion. Thanks again for watching.

    • @Neekzu
      @Neekzu 3 дня назад

      @@InspiredWithAC Oh I should have clarified that I was talking about your room reverb being recorded into the mic

    • @InspiredWithAC
      @InspiredWithAC  3 дня назад

      Oh, gotcha. You’re absolutely correct on that assessment. I use RX11 for some de-reverb, but it’s nowhere near as efficient as actually taking out the reflections in the room.

  • @stephenmaxam
    @stephenmaxam 4 дня назад

    For a dummy like me exploring the smart eq has been ear opening

    • @InspiredWithAC
      @InspiredWithAC  4 дня назад

      Not a dummy when you’re learning. Glad to hear it’s been helpful. It’s a fantastic EQ. Thanks for watching.

  • @VinceJackson1
    @VinceJackson1 4 дня назад

    Smart EQ completely speeds up my work flow with AI! Pro Q4 is a disappointing update compared to Tone Boosters EQ pro with has transient sustain & filters that can remove ambience in any range for around $30 next level! I'm sticking with Pro Q3 for basic needs.

  • @ucheattoh
    @ucheattoh 5 дней назад +2

    a bias review...

    • @Big_Nigs64
      @Big_Nigs64 5 дней назад

      Definitely and ad fro pro q 4

    • @InspiredWithAC
      @InspiredWithAC  4 дня назад +4

      Not an ad at all. I bought both products and use them both. Neither company paid me to make the video. Just trying to help others who are thinking of buying either of these EQs. Thanks for watching though. ✌🏽