The Quad Cortex sounds better than the kemper. The Kemper Loses some of the low mids when playing through a cab. The Quad cortex fixed that issue. This is why everyone is switching over to them.
Damn, I hope it’s just more accurate low mids and not necessarily “more.” Depending on the profile in the Kemper, like a Bogner for example, the lows are overwhelming cranked up through a cab. I’m interested to try a QC still.
@@MrRyanshreds It is more accurate. I've watched someone compare an amp, a kemper profile of the amp & the quad profile of the same amp & the quad was better across the board. even when i turned my back i couldn't tell the difference between the amp & the quad. The kemper i could tell cause it was missing something.
@@MrRyanshreds He mentioned hearing low wattage speakers in an EVH Cab....those speakers are heritage greenbacks which are 20 watt speakers & are used on countless recordings now. those cabs are amazing.
MK III has an extra gain stage. The Master reverb has diod clipping instead of the 4 gain stages. It was the first JCM 900s. It's a great amp. The SLX was the last iteration of the 900.
@MrRyanshreds also its a 2100 the high gain dual reverb was a 4500. What is crazy to me and throws alot of people off is the Mark 3 tag. It's a 2100. Remember it has a extra preamp tube like the slx but the slx sounds horrible to my ears. It also has 4 preamp tubes but it's really brittle 80s metal sounding where the 2100 mk 3 sounds open like a JCM 800 with just more balls. Think about the time. It was around the time everyone was getting JMP and JCM800s moded for more gain.
Видеоклипы
Emgs , orange head, mesa cabs....my favorite tone.
The Quad Cortex sounds better than the kemper. The Kemper Loses some of the low mids when playing through a cab. The Quad cortex fixed that issue. This is why everyone is switching over to them.
Damn, I hope it’s just more accurate low mids and not necessarily “more.” Depending on the profile in the Kemper, like a Bogner for example, the lows are overwhelming cranked up through a cab. I’m interested to try a QC still.
@@MrRyanshreds It is more accurate. I've watched someone compare an amp, a kemper profile of the amp & the quad profile of the same amp & the quad was better across the board. even when i turned my back i couldn't tell the difference between the amp & the quad. The kemper i could tell cause it was missing something.
V30’s are 60w rms. That makes a 4X12 240 rms, not low wattage in my experience.
I think we meant more like, when you compare them to the G12k100 or a Swamp thing. 100- 120 watt speakers.
@@MrRyanshreds He mentioned hearing low wattage speakers in an EVH Cab....those speakers are heritage greenbacks which are 20 watt speakers & are used on countless recordings now. those cabs are amazing.
@@MrRyanshreds I get ya homeboy, I think a lot of peeps think v30’s are 30w still to this day. Killer content, new sub.
@@lailer1975 much obliged dude, and yeah I was guilty of that for a long time haha.
MK III has an extra gain stage. The Master reverb has diod clipping instead of the 4 gain stages. It was the first JCM 900s. It's a great amp. The SLX was the last iteration of the 900.
Interesting, thanks for the info dude
@MrRyanshreds also its a 2100 the high gain dual reverb was a 4500. What is crazy to me and throws alot of people off is the Mark 3 tag. It's a 2100. Remember it has a extra preamp tube like the slx but the slx sounds horrible to my ears. It also has 4 preamp tubes but it's really brittle 80s metal sounding where the 2100 mk 3 sounds open like a JCM 800 with just more balls. Think about the time. It was around the time everyone was getting JMP and JCM800s moded for more gain.