Bard: Platons Niietsche-family works worldwide, technology for the future, my book, I am a philosopher. Hegel. Elung: Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
Amazing pod. Just a little feedback. The interviewer says. “Yeah” “mh” “as” “eaä” ”m” It knocks me off the topic…. Listen to other podders. And see how they listen.
Interesting, but why is Mr Bard comparing Swedish and German pop music and not for example at least the prog rock, jazz, metal or classical music? Because these more advanced genres of music are the fields where novelty is born, pop music is almost by it´s definition a product of the cultural industry, so what do you expect?
First of all, I wanna mention that I shared your conversation with Daniel Schmachtenberger on facebook. Usually I wouldn´t comment on details like this given example, but since it seems to be a recurring part of your current program or so, I´d like to mention that, generally speaking, the repeated associative linking of any form of disability with the imitation of any form of dialect or accent, especially publically and especially when speakers of that satirized culture are not around, can be seen as problematic, and it is important to consider and weigh up the actual benefit with the potential harm the reproduction of such communicative memes can have. Because, even though "the Germans" might be a target of mockery which is obviously not a persecuted minority, it´s the general communication pattern which seems a bit problematic to me. On the content level of your statement, I would say, the bigger a cultural-economical entity is, the larger its cultural industry is, and a larger cultural industry is not really correlating with better quality, I guess we can agree on this. But precision / clarity in language matters, and it is important that you are, when iyou are logically inducting your experiences with the pop-industry of a certain country, making a statement of this certain scope and not more general. Connecting a dialect or pronounciation with a disability to produce novelty is a level of generalisation which is rather populistic. I don´t want to refer too much to the "woky-left" language regulation, in this context it could be labeled as "hate-speech" but maybe this would go too far. But it is definitely populistic and potentially harmful with only limited educational benefit. So maybe think about different examples when trying to make your point. Rather talk about the "cultural industry", that´s more accurate and suitable for a philosopher. From there you can still take the German pop industry as an example taken from personal experience, but then it is clearer what the actual point is, or should be, in my humble opinion.
The future impact of AI you're talking about (easy web presences and direct selling) has already happened. Creating webpages and selling directly is accessible and affordable. The issue is the same as it's always been: education. If destitute people don't know about AI and have nowhere to learn about it, how are they supposed to use it? Or if you're illiterate, how can you interface with AI technology? I project that AI will have a devastating effect on emerging nations in particular. Or at least, any nation experiencing a 'brain drain' will accelerate its downfall because AI can't instantaneously develop a country, and why should someone who earned the means to leave stay somewhere they suffer for 20+ years? So everyone who can move to greener pastures, will - and AI is making that easier than ever. This also aligns with the EUs population correction agenda. They need young people who can pay tax and support their upside down population pyramid, and talented people in developing/emerging nations want to give their family a better life. Unless AI leads to a global universal basic income, it will disproportionately affect nations. IMO.
A side note you might find interesting: this is unconfirmed but I have a giant hunch that remote work is holding South Africa's head above the water right now. Our brain drain is intense, but locals who can are getting international jobs and paying much more tax than they would be otherwise. It's a win-win-win: business gets affordable talent, local talent gets better compensation and our government collects more tax. If only our government didn't suck, lol.
![FNAF vs TF2 - Episode 2 [SFM]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/z5b3V2-VLb0/mqdefault.jpg)
Bard: Platons Niietsche-family works worldwide, technology for the future, my book, I am a philosopher. Hegel.
Elung: Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
Yeah yeah hm hm yeah hmm?
Bard is pure genius 👌
I swear Elung is an AI robot with his "Yeah" machine gun 😂
His yeah should be used as a form of torture and distraction technique, highly effective
Amazing pod. Just a little feedback. The interviewer says. “Yeah” “mh” “as” “eaä” ”m”
It knocks me off the topic….
Listen to other podders. And see how they listen.
Interesting, but why is Mr Bard comparing Swedish and German pop music and not for example at least the prog rock, jazz, metal or classical music? Because these more advanced genres of music are the fields where novelty is born, pop music is almost by it´s definition a product of the cultural industry, so what do you expect?
First of all, I wanna mention that I shared your conversation with Daniel Schmachtenberger on facebook.
Usually I wouldn´t comment on details like this given example, but since it seems to be a recurring part of your current program or so, I´d like to mention that, generally speaking, the repeated associative linking of any form of disability with the imitation of any form of dialect or accent, especially publically and especially when speakers of that satirized culture are not around, can be seen as problematic, and it is important to consider and weigh up the actual benefit with the potential harm the reproduction of such communicative memes can have. Because, even though "the Germans" might be a target of mockery which is obviously not a persecuted minority, it´s the general communication pattern which seems a bit problematic to me.
On the content level of your statement, I would say, the bigger a cultural-economical entity is, the larger its cultural industry is, and a larger cultural industry is not really correlating with better quality, I guess we can agree on this.
But precision / clarity in language matters, and it is important that you are, when iyou are logically inducting your experiences with the pop-industry of a certain country, making a statement of this certain scope and not more general. Connecting a dialect or pronounciation with a disability to produce novelty is a level of generalisation which is rather populistic.
I don´t want to refer too much to the "woky-left" language regulation, in this context it could be labeled as "hate-speech" but maybe this would go too far. But it is definitely populistic and potentially harmful with only limited educational benefit. So maybe think about different examples when trying to make your point. Rather talk about the "cultural industry", that´s more accurate and suitable for a philosopher. From there you can still take the German pop industry as an example taken from personal experience, but then it is clearer what the actual point is, or should be, in my humble opinion.
The future impact of AI you're talking about (easy web presences and direct selling) has already happened. Creating webpages and selling directly is accessible and affordable.
The issue is the same as it's always been: education.
If destitute people don't know about AI and have nowhere to learn about it, how are they supposed to use it?
Or if you're illiterate, how can you interface with AI technology?
I project that AI will have a devastating effect on emerging nations in particular. Or at least, any nation experiencing a 'brain drain' will accelerate its downfall because AI can't instantaneously develop a country, and why should someone who earned the means to leave stay somewhere they suffer for 20+ years?
So everyone who can move to greener pastures, will - and AI is making that easier than ever.
This also aligns with the EUs population correction agenda. They need young people who can pay tax and support their upside down population pyramid, and talented people in developing/emerging nations want to give their family a better life.
Unless AI leads to a global universal basic income, it will disproportionately affect nations. IMO.
A side note you might find interesting: this is unconfirmed but I have a giant hunch that remote work is holding South Africa's head above the water right now. Our brain drain is intense, but locals who can are getting international jobs and paying much more tax than they would be otherwise.
It's a win-win-win: business gets affordable talent, local talent gets better compensation and our government collects more tax. If only our government didn't suck, lol.