Love this list! Just wondering why playing 4x Gurmgag instead of 4x Cryptic Serpent? Also i would consider running 3x force spike (i played it on Mono U terror and it turned out to be fantastic) cutting 2x snuff out and 1x fang to reduce black cards and be more consistent with landrops. Anyway, great work!
@@enriconardese6968 interesting take, mane reason for angler is it costs 1 and is a versatile threat, means you can likely deploy it earlier or with more mana back up. However, not against it the proposed changes for sure 😁
@@TeasdaleMTG I see i see, just thinking how often u find yourself locked with terrors/other anglers in hand after delving six. But it's also true that it's pretty easy for this deck to fill the graveyard. Anyway i'll bring this list at my LGS with some changes for sure, ill let you know how it goes 😁
I don't know if snacker is great in this deck it feels like it has too much tension with the rest of the deck. Also I am not super high on this terror list vs the more control version because so many decks are trying to get under ponza.
Insane that terror feels power crept to complete shit. I think some of the more control builds have some more promise, but good lord the classic UB style seems awful.
I recently played a similar list and really enjoyed it! I think this shell has potential - nice work
@@SnapBolt Thanks man, Appreciate it 😁
Love this list! Just wondering why playing 4x Gurmgag instead of 4x Cryptic Serpent? Also i would consider running 3x force spike (i played it on Mono U terror and it turned out to be fantastic) cutting 2x snuff out and 1x fang to reduce black cards and be more consistent with landrops. Anyway, great work!
@@enriconardese6968 interesting take, mane reason for angler is it costs 1 and is a versatile threat, means you can likely deploy it earlier or with more mana back up. However, not against it the proposed changes for sure 😁
@@TeasdaleMTG I see i see, just thinking how often u find yourself locked with terrors/other anglers in hand after delving six. But it's also true that it's pretty easy for this deck to fill the graveyard. Anyway i'll bring this list at my LGS with some changes for sure, ill let you know how it goes 😁
Step 1 insert clickbait title snacker op step 2 proceed to cut snackers every time 😂
I don't know if snacker is great in this deck it feels like it has too much tension with the rest of the deck. Also I am not super high on this terror list vs the more control version because so many decks are trying to get under ponza.
You had me at UB
Insane that terror feels power crept to complete shit. I think some of the more control builds have some more promise, but good lord the classic UB style seems awful.