⚔️Templars vs. Mamluks⚔️ The Final Battle for the Holy Land, 1263-1291
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 27 мар 2024
- Sign up for a 14-day free trial and enjoy all the amazing features MyHeritage has to offer! bit.ly/RealCrusadesHistoryMH
After crushing his Mamluk rivals, Sultan Baibars turns his armies against the Crusader States, which occupy the coast of the Holy Land. The Crusader States are dwarfed by the massive Mamluk Empire, and dangerously outnumbered by their armies. But crusader castles are powerful, their warriors capable and determined. At the forefront of the Crusaders are the military orders, especially the Knights Templar and the Knights Hospitaller. Can Baibars overcome these courageous warrior monks? Will his vast legions, even with the advantage of numbers, be able to deal with Templar determination? This is truly a clash of the best against the best. The Mamluks are outstanding cavalry fighters, vanquishers of the Mongols at the Battle of Ain Jalut. But the Templars are led by Grand Master William of Beauju, a pious leader who fights alongside his knights, who will not yield in the face of overwhelming odds. It was the Templars who had been key in many of the crusaders’ critical victories against Saladin.
Watch my video about the Battle of Ain Jalut: • Mongols vs. Mamluks: T...
Get my book about the Crusades:
www.amazon.com/Why-Does-Heathe...
Support my work on Patreon:
/ realcrusadeshistory
Get the music used in this video:
www.amazon.com/Lit-Sky-Roman-...
Sources:
-Arab Historians of the Crusades, trans. Francesco Gabrieli, (Barnes and Noble Books, 1993)
-Barber, Malcolm - The New Knighthood, (Cambridge, 1994)
-Frale, Barbara - The Templars - The Secret History Revealed, (Arcade, 2009)
-Madden, Thomas - The New Concise History of the Crusades, (Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, 2006)
-Nicholson, Helen - The Knights Templar, (Sutton, 2001)
-Riley-Smith, Jonathan - The Crusades: A History, (Yale University Press, 2005)
-The Templar of Tyre: Part III of the Deeds of the Cypriots, trans. Paul F. Crawford, (Ashgate, 2017)
-Tyerman, Christopher - God’s War, (Harvard University Press, 2006)
#knightstemplar #mamluks #medievalhistory
Sign up for a 14-day free trial and enjoy all the amazing features MyHeritage has to offer! bit.ly/RealCrusadesHistoryMH
Get my book on the Crusades: www.amazon.com/Why-Does-Heathen-Rage-Crusades/dp/152395762X
Thank you for this video and God bless you. ✝️
I want to write a book about the templars I believe with all my heart that the templars were killed out of fear and jealously . Sorry for the rant sir .
Hi Jay, Iove your vids and your patreon myHeritage too. Did some research last year and discovered that if youre lucky and search long enough you can even trace back lines to famed people like Rollo the Viking and Baldwin Ii
@@pvijgeboomHow much does it cost when you sign up. I know it said 14 day free trial but you usually have to set up payment first before you can use this sort of stuff. I am keen to know my family history as I didn't even see or meet my grandparents before they died and my parents divorced early so all I know is that my parents were born in Holland in 1940 and migrated to Australia in the mid 60,s. That's all.
@@Spartan902 I think the costs are around 120 usd per year. In my opinion that was worth it because you can find a lot of cool stuff about your relatives in one year. You can also do the DNA test and that gives you also a free month. Good luck!
The Christian Crusading order deserve some Sabaton songs
Nah, they need Powerwolf songs
The Portuguese Order of Christ would avenge the templars 200 years later, at the battle of Diu (1509).
Mamluks met crusaders few times after this too like at battle of rhodes 1444 but yea Portuguese at diu hammered in final nail in the coffin of mamluks
@@bruhmcchaddeus413 its because mumluks aren’t good in naval warfare portuguese have no chance again mamluks in pitch battle
Anyway this region doesn't belong to Christianity any more!
@@onikkobe but who’s there now?
Actually no it wouldnt😁
Happy Good Friday to all mein Christian brüders. Happy Easter to J. Stephen Roberts!
I just want to say the nights Templar in my book has my respect even though they lost the holy land, they were outnumbered and fought to the bitter end, some of them, and planning to retake the whole land. They were killed by the French king, what a lowlife.
I agree with you 💯.
but their legacy didn't end in the Holy Land. on the other far end of the Mediterranean, king Denis of Portugal kept the legacy alive establishing the "Military Order Of Christ" which was an off shoot of the Templars , being officially recognized by the pope in the papal bull he drafted 1319. interestingly enough, all of Portugal's famous navigators were born into that deeply religious Christian military order . and don't forget, the Reconquista and waging war against Islam was baked into the national identity of the Portuguese when they first created their global maritime empire, as they took the crusading and fighting spirit head on into North Africa and the rest the Islamic world. . at the height of their global maritime empire , the world was a very dangerous place for Muslims if they had the unfortunate experience of encountering the Portuguese empire.
I am Ready!
Cool bro.
This video was fascinating; two centuries later, in 1509, in the Battle of Diu, the Portuguese Order of Christ would get revenge on the templars.
That would be a great subject for the next series! How the Portuguese Finally CRUSHED the Mamluks...would be an excellent title!
Revenge for what? they were int he holy land illegally,they occupied it and killed several 100k of innocent people there.they were defeated and sent back to their coúntries and their acrossities and Blodsheds were put to an end.
@eldeebcampeador yeah ok and y'all got smashed at Vienna couldn't conquer Europe, go be a terrorist apologist
@@eldeebcampeadorThe battle of Chaul occured before the Battle of Diu. Lourenço was the son of Francisco, the man who would avenge his death at the battle of Diu. The Mameluks were destroyed, only 20 were allowed to keep their lives. The mameluk defeat was so great that the sultanate would be conquered by the ottomans given the crisis caused by loosing direct trade with the indian ocean. Cry about it saracen.
@@diogobarata6346 and then ironically enough, the Portuguese empire would also crush Ottoman ambitions in the Indian ocean some years later.
A really well researched and engaging documentary.
Really nice and exciting work! Thank you!
Excellent content as always
Great upload as always
Thank you for another good video it had some nice information in it
I really enjoyed this video, especially with the clips from Total War 1212 ad, great work.
Great video as always!
Glad you enjoyed!
Such a great effort and enjoyable narration, thank you so much.
Glad you enjoyed it!
Amazing channel I love this place
It was an informative and wonderful historical coverage episode about the last Crusades battle for Holyland ( Jerusalem kingdom) preserving ,Crusades fought Mamluk army of Aubbed dynasty (Cairo )during Salhei rules .thank you for sharing... Crusades hadn't demographic depths..templer fought furiously beneath faith standards and stubborn.
Well done, atta boy!
nice work
Thanks
Frank cheap castle bonus too OP
What video game is used to create the footage?
The game is "total war: atilla" there is a mod for that game called "Medieval kingdoms 1212ad"which you can see in this video
Thank you so much mate 🙏
Where did the Templars and Hospitalers get all their wealth from?
Donations from wealthy patrons.
Mamluks were slaves who then took control ober theier masters and lands. They were mostly tscherkess, georgian and turkic people
And slavs theyr first sultan was tall blond blue eyed man inslaved on the territory of nowdays ukr-rus
Baibars was a 🦁
He never had to face the crusaders on even terms. It's interesting, crusaders like Richard the Lionheart and Baldwin the Leper King defeated much larger Saracen armies under very unfavorable conditions. Baibars always had overwhelming numerical advantage against the crusaders. If he'd been outnumbered would he have ever won anything?
@@RealCrusadesHistoryno, the crusaders would’ve driven him back to mamulukland
@@RealCrusadesHistorythat man fought larger mongol armies and even the mongols we’re defeated so and he fought against Louis 9 in Mansoura you just can’t accept the truth
21:39 right most person. Is that a rifleman? 😮
Crossbow
Firstly, we do not know if Baibars el bendaqdary killed women and children as you say... But didn’t the Crusaders kill everyone who was in Jerusalem during their first campaign? They exterminated Muslims, Jews, and even Eastern Christians... Saladin treated them with mercy, but the response was that they returned with other campaigns, and so the Mamluks thought that is no solution for the crusaders except to punish them bloodily
You are mistaken, Baybar's army was merciless
@@editrees2667 The army will not kill women and children. They may be sold in slave markets, but killing them is unlikely
Jesus...Saladin wasn't merciful... Saladin did kill many Muslims farmers on the crusades kingdom
@@the4universes207Source: Trust me
@@user-fl5mq9kp7g hahahaha Saladin invaded more sunn Muslims lands then the crusades... They were Muslims who work with the crusades against Saladin
but their legacy didn't end in the Holy Land. on the other far end of the Mediterranean, king Denis of Portugal kept the legacy alive establishing the "Military Order Of Christ" which was an off shoot of the Templars , being officially recognized by the pope in the papal bull he drafted 1319. interestingly enough, all the famous Portuguese navigators were born into that deeply religious military order . and don't forget, the Reconquista and waging war against Islam was baked into the national identity of the Portuguese when they first created their global maritime empire, as they took the crusading and fighting spirit head on into North Africa and the rest the Islamic world. . at the height of their global maritime empire , the world was a very dangerous place for Muslims if they had the unfortunate experience of encountering the Portuguese crusading empire.
As much as I enjoyed your videos, I respectfully disagree with one particular phrase. Mamluks weren't of "turkic" origin. They were indeed slave soldiers but they were under heavy Ayyubid influence, trained by ayyubids, spoke Arabic, wrote arabic, and consisted of different ethnic groups not unique to one faction. There are some false historical claims that Mamluks were turkic due to their Kipchak origin. In reality, they were part of the Ayyubid sultanate just like many other varied folks.
Christus Resurrexit!
+][+
Please Serbian tittle😃
Antioch was only massacre
Really
🤲☪️✊
Stay on the subject.
When did he not?
big thanks to the Mamluks ,that they defeated these criminals from europe,who killd more than 100k of innocent people there.Even europe didnt want them .The Templers were later attacked by french king and wiped out from history
The mamluks were enslaved people by arabs and so on. They were mostly of georgian, tscherkess and turkic origin.
Just as muslims did when they storm those lands...all of those lands were christian 1000yrs before foundation of islam
Wasn't there an Italian Army called the
" Mama- Luke's" 😅