@@Malikav0311Lol, Dr. Peterson even mentions and argues for classical liberalism towards the conclusion of the video, which is inextricably tied to, if not synonymous with, American libertarianism. It was the very basis for American libertarianism, which is itself a revival of classical liberalism, in contrast with the European version of it originating from France, which advocates more profoundly for anarchy. So Dr. Peterson is in fact supporting American libertarianism with his supposed critique of it.
@@d-p_ You are implying that "American libertarianism" has any kind of singular cohesive ideology. It doesn't. Ask 50 different American libertarians what the term means to them and you will get 50 different answers, some of which are wildly different and contradictory. That's why libertarians can't unify to win elections. They can't even agree enough to form a cogent platform. The hilariously incoherent explanation of American libertarianism on wikipedia just goes to support this. The only real argument that can even be logically made here is that it's not possible to tie the term classical liberalism to American libertarianism, as the second doesn't even have a single cogent definition. But libertarians pull this all the time. When they hear a comparison they like, they are immediate happy to self associate with it. When they don't like the comparison, you get the "that's not us" or "not all libertarians". Genuinely, a bunch of children incapable of anything other than in fighting, naive economic and social theories, and purity spiraling.
Can't wait for his interview with Milei
what is this from?
He’s unwittingly making an argument FOR Libertarianism.
No, he's not. Stop coping.
@@Malikav0311Lol, Dr. Peterson even mentions and argues for classical liberalism towards the conclusion of the video, which is inextricably tied to, if not synonymous with, American libertarianism. It was the very basis for American libertarianism, which is itself a revival of classical liberalism, in contrast with the European version of it originating from France, which advocates more profoundly for anarchy. So Dr. Peterson is in fact supporting American libertarianism with his supposed critique of it.
@@d-p_ You are implying that "American libertarianism" has any kind of singular cohesive ideology. It doesn't. Ask 50 different American libertarians what the term means to them and you will get 50 different answers, some of which are wildly different and contradictory.
That's why libertarians can't unify to win elections. They can't even agree enough to form a cogent platform. The hilariously incoherent explanation of American libertarianism on wikipedia just goes to support this.
The only real argument that can even be logically made here is that it's not possible to tie the term classical liberalism to American libertarianism, as the second doesn't even have a single cogent definition.
But libertarians pull this all the time. When they hear a comparison they like, they are immediate happy to self associate with it. When they don't like the comparison, you get the "that's not us" or "not all libertarians".
Genuinely, a bunch of children incapable of anything other than in fighting, naive economic and social theories, and purity spiraling.