Read a vernier caliper in INCHES, measure a ball bearing

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 31 дек 2024

Комментарии • 190

  • @AndyCYXU
    @AndyCYXU Год назад +16

    great explanation and great example why Imperial needs to be abolished its a joke lmao, guy using metric measured all his bearings went home had a diner and is having a beer, while imperial guy still stuck on adjusting fractions to common denominator LOL

  • @dayward1
    @dayward1 6 лет назад +12

    Thank you so much. I'm from USA, but I've been living abroad for 19 years. You have helped me polish up on SAE caliper measurements. You are a good teacher. Keep it up!

  • @Bustednuckles
    @Bustednuckles 12 лет назад +13

    Thank you, very much.
    This was an excellent teaching video.
    Finding one to explain the metric aspect of the vernier caliper is easy, finding one that explains the inch side is quite another story and I would highly recommend this one.

  • @andrewwolf4430
    @andrewwolf4430 11 месяцев назад +1

    When I was a mechanic 50 years ago. I bought. A very nears 😊caliper but didn’t have a clue. So I went to the machine shop down the street and asked the old guy how to read it. Thankfully he was very patient and he first taught me fraction math and finally how to read it. I was very happy when the dial calipers came out.

  • @Ковидкапут
    @Ковидкапут 3 месяца назад +1

    Thank you, Sir. Very clear explanation for a man from metric world.

  • @1malikalik
    @1malikalik Год назад +1

    Thank you so much.
    Am a Metric guy and rarely use imperial but with your excellent tutorial I am confident to tackle inches.
    Thanks and I am now subscribed to your channel hope to see more content.

  • @jonarbuckle1560
    @jonarbuckle1560 7 лет назад +4

    I come back today after buying a NEW set of vernier calipers because I am tired of breaking my dial calipers!
    Thank you again for your worki and space aged white board ;)

  • @apprenticemath
    @apprenticemath  12 лет назад +6

    Yes, it is. The math of decimal inches from 0.1-0.01" is on my dial caliper video. On my micrometer video the range is 0.1-0.0001". Manufacturers tend to make sliding instruments only accurate to 0.1 units. The dial caliper has gears inside for better accuracy, and micrometers have fine-pitched screw thread mechanisms for even better accuracy. Enjoy discovery.

  • @MisinformationHater
    @MisinformationHater 3 года назад +3

    Good video.
    I can read metric and imperial now, main scale along with the vernier sliding scale.

  • @ottosykle
    @ottosykle 11 лет назад +9

    Thanks for taking the time to explain in such detail, great video.

  • @sohaibb4736
    @sohaibb4736 2 года назад

    So far the best demonstration on the subject!

  • @geraldmouse
    @geraldmouse 9 месяцев назад +1

    I have got so used to metric after 50 yrs that I was struggling to remember how to add the 128-ths for an order. So many lazy ones just use digital inches (why mix systems?). This was both helpful and easy to follow, thanks.

  • @bkrefting5225
    @bkrefting5225 Год назад +1

    Excellent class. This is how I will teach it. Thank you for sharing.

  • @jonarbuckle1560
    @jonarbuckle1560 8 лет назад +9

    Excellent lecture. You are a talented teacher.
    Easily the best lesson vernier caliper use on the web.

  • @cdnbacon2001
    @cdnbacon2001 5 лет назад +1

    thank you i have 2 calipers and i never understood how to use them. knowledge is power.

  • @sircapalot7447
    @sircapalot7447 5 месяцев назад +1

    Best explanation on out there great job 😊

  • @yumekomatsu6674
    @yumekomatsu6674 6 лет назад

    Thank you good sir for the video. Now i realized how simple vernier caliper is. Cheers from the Philippines

  • @mitudas2800
    @mitudas2800 2 года назад

    Thank you very much. Keep uploading videos, it is helping very much.

  • @goatmoag
    @goatmoag 5 лет назад +2

    What a great instructor. And a dumpster diver too! Perfection.

  • @reshidipsingh398
    @reshidipsingh398 Год назад

    Great video, never had to use one with 1/128. Very informative

  • @h.d.rbandara1047
    @h.d.rbandara1047 7 месяцев назад +2

    Great explain sir.thank you ..

  • @EmilMarius1960
    @EmilMarius1960 Год назад +1

    "Total easiness" comparing with measurement in millimeters! Without paper and pen, seems to be difficult to read in inch. Thank you!

  • @jabezcabahug8355
    @jabezcabahug8355 3 года назад +1

    Thank you so much for this! Excellent work!

  • @StephenMbewe-j8d
    @StephenMbewe-j8d 11 месяцев назад +1

    Thank you very much I have really benefited.

  • @winniesaldanha5057
    @winniesaldanha5057 2 года назад

    Thank you so much. This video is excellent for me.

  • @steveb936
    @steveb936 2 года назад

    Thanks for the video, a nice refresher for my old brain,
    question, you said @16:25 "they're not perfectly aligned" If we was turning down a shaft on a lathe for that bearing to run on what would we use to get the exact measurement?

    • @apprenticemath
      @apprenticemath  2 года назад +1

      Micrometers lessen this misalignment problem by 10x, but that's about the end of hand-held solutions. Light (laser or visible) in some hi-tech bench devices or computerized robot arms, ... some fancy stuff for ultimate exactness. Calipers do ok for some manufacturing.

  • @victoriarobersohn3592
    @victoriarobersohn3592 6 лет назад +5

    128 divided by 16 = 8, so you can multiply the numerator by 8 to get the number of 128ths. Seems easier like that.

    • @scorbett4370
      @scorbett4370 2 года назад +1

      That is how this magnificent teacher described it.

  • @jumabarton6337
    @jumabarton6337 8 лет назад

    thanks for the explanation i understood it better here than in class when the profe was explaining

  • @richardwarren6541
    @richardwarren6541 7 лет назад

    Thanks.! I'm learning a lot. I find your videos helpful. I'm going to into mechanical engineering.

  • @syedahmadghaznavi9534
    @syedahmadghaznavi9534 4 года назад +1

    Thanks a lot.an excellent explanation I must say.

  • @SuperManny1952
    @SuperManny1952 4 года назад

    Thank you very much nice and informative video measuring in inches.

  • @abdurasheedummathur2889
    @abdurasheedummathur2889 Год назад

    Excellent tutorial

  • @stormbytes
    @stormbytes 4 года назад +2

    Really great explanation. Very clear. Would have been good to include some practical advice when measuring with a caliper. So for instance, if you're cutting wood then 81/128 is basically 5/8" whereas if you're a machinist then 81/138 = 0.633". Accuracy is very much in function of the process.

  • @kalaabdulrahim9126
    @kalaabdulrahim9126 3 года назад

    Thank you very much to up load.

  • @abrahamofentsemagwaza2358
    @abrahamofentsemagwaza2358 8 лет назад

    Thanks, I'll check those teachings in the playlist.

  • @josephleister9198
    @josephleister9198 3 года назад +1

    Great video...thank you

  • @ruelgedorio6547
    @ruelgedorio6547 4 года назад

    So HELLAA NIICEE!! You help a lot in my exam❤️

  • @giro808
    @giro808 2 года назад

    great video

  • @pamelaparker4143
    @pamelaparker4143 10 лет назад

    you are a born teacher. thank you so much

  • @tradewater
    @tradewater 9 лет назад

    Excellent video. Very informative. Thank you.

  • @hunterlindbert2679
    @hunterlindbert2679 5 месяцев назад +1

    Metric seems so much easier 😭😭 great explanation though

  • @hussein5718
    @hussein5718 7 лет назад +1

    Thank you, knowledge is truly power.

  • @fabio.1
    @fabio.1 3 года назад

    Nice explanation, thank you!

  • @dennispeterson3691
    @dennispeterson3691 Год назад

    Great video!

  • @estardoelenot.2070
    @estardoelenot.2070 5 лет назад

    Shouldn't we used LCD? 2/16 right? If we uses LCD it will be 16/128. (LCD. 128÷16=8) So 2(8)/128 Or 16/128. Your answer is correct but some of my friends were unable to understand if how did you derive in that answer. So for those who haven't understand it too we uses LCD to derive for that answer.

    • @apprenticemath
      @apprenticemath  5 лет назад

      By reducing to lowest terms mentally, bypassing written variants of LCD
      Thanks for watching

  • @vt1100
    @vt1100 10 лет назад +2

    in millimeters all clear external dimension of 80 mm of Japan and the bearing can probably Toyo

    • @9a3hp
      @9a3hp 4 года назад

      Correct, milimeter scale much more frendly and simple.

  • @jerickpajanoy1193
    @jerickpajanoy1193 4 года назад

    jst try the p+(q x least count)
    where;
    p= main scale reading just before the zero mark of the vernier scale
    q= nth vernier division that coincides with the main scale division
    Least count = 1/128
    Therefore;
    3 2/16+(3x1/128) = 3.148 or 3 19/128
    This is just another way solving for the actual reading and for me I find it more easy because I just need to know the working formula.

  • @andrewmorke
    @andrewmorke 7 лет назад +3

    Very thorough. I wish my math and physics teachers in school had taught me in this manner.

  • @darrenpickens7147
    @darrenpickens7147 5 лет назад +1

    And that is why i have a vernier caliper that measures in thousandths (.001). Much easier to deal with powers of 10 than fractions of 1/128's. Great video though.

    • @goatmoag
      @goatmoag 5 лет назад +1

      Yeah, but fractions are a lot more fun!

  • @mckenziekeith7434
    @mckenziekeith7434 3 месяца назад

    It is actually easier to measure in metric and convert to inches. There is no real excuse for using 1/128 of an inch as a unit of measure. Even if you insist on using inches, calipers should be calibrated in mils (thousandths of an inch).

  • @J.A.Smith2397
    @J.A.Smith2397 3 года назад

    I need it like this thanks.!

  • @andybilakshow260
    @andybilakshow260 Год назад

    Correct me if I'm wrong. I know this vid is really old, but perhaps someone here can confirm my theory.
    This is pertaining to the "ID" of the bearing.
    being a hair over the 1/6th mark and behind the nearest 1/128th, Wouldn't it be more accurate to say the answer is 1-1/266th?
    So essentially you're dividing the verneir scale in half.
    Edit: It looks like the "8" on the sliding scale *is* lined up. Therefore the measurement would be 1-23/128"?

    • @apprenticemath
      @apprenticemath  Год назад +1

      Readings could be rounded to nearest 1/128 or 1/256 but ultimately finer measurements needed a different approach to measuring length - micrometers.

    • @andybilakshow260
      @andybilakshow260 Год назад

      @@apprenticemath Thanks for that.
      Would you happen to know an average standard tolerances for press fit items such as pulleys and or bearings?
      The best I could come up with was 1/1000th" difference between inner / outer.
      Seems kinda loose to me.

  • @vagabond3747
    @vagabond3747 Год назад

    Thank you Sir,👍

  • @EngineeringStudyMaterials
    @EngineeringStudyMaterials 6 лет назад +1

    Thank you very much for the Video. It Helps me a lot.
    Well Explained.

  • @johnlj649
    @johnlj649 7 лет назад

    great vids, i learned a lot from it. reading in mm & inches. thank you for the tips. what about in cm? do you have any vid on this.

    • @apprenticemath
      @apprenticemath  7 лет назад +1

      Nothing on cm, not used in trades/tech/eng.

  • @freezerburn04
    @freezerburn04 6 лет назад

    Excellent write up. Thanks a ton A++

  • @razihamilton1718
    @razihamilton1718 6 лет назад

    i m new in canada and i need this ! so thx and big thx

  • @s1vrbck_fitness
    @s1vrbck_fitness 4 месяца назад

    excellent!

  • @michaelorr181
    @michaelorr181 8 лет назад

    very nice, very precise!

  • @jashimuddin7716
    @jashimuddin7716 4 года назад

    Thank you very much very helpful

  • @rajanDongol
    @rajanDongol 8 лет назад

    there is no upper scale in my caliper..now how to measure inner..

  • @thomasalexander1851
    @thomasalexander1851 6 лет назад

    Great video, thanks!

  • @kgee2111
    @kgee2111 5 лет назад

    Good video. Thanks.

  • @dr.mystic4789
    @dr.mystic4789 5 лет назад

    good job

  • @darrellangeles5416
    @darrellangeles5416 9 лет назад +2

    thank you good sir!!

  • @ITIFITTERELEARNING
    @ITIFITTERELEARNING 11 лет назад +1

    Nice Video

  • @daifeichu
    @daifeichu 10 лет назад

    Didn't anyone else notice the audio in this video? Seems to have faded in and out as he goes close and further away from the mike. Besides that, good video.

  • @mangenijulius4491
    @mangenijulius4491 11 лет назад +3

    thanks alot i really appreciate

  • @TheHolan
    @TheHolan 7 месяцев назад

    finally NOW i can read the inch side of the caliper and NOW i am very sure that i will NEVER do it.

  • @alex23bonilla
    @alex23bonilla 9 лет назад

    Thank you easy explanation.

  • @jasonwright9264
    @jasonwright9264 12 лет назад +1

    You did a good job explaining how to read the 1/128th scale on the caliper. I wish you taugh the 1/1000th scale. Obvioulsy its more accurate than the 1/128th scale.

  • @joshuagibson2520
    @joshuagibson2520 11 месяцев назад

    Guess I got a mismarked scale on my caliper. Not only do the 0 and 8 line up, but so do the 123456 and 7. There is no offset on them. Nor on the metric side either. Same thing. They all lineup with no offset. Lol. Its okay. I just need to measure drill sizes the the nearest 32. It will get me close enough. They are $1.99 plastic calipers anyway. They are well made and marked honestly. Just there is no offset on the vernier itself. Its kinda funny the more I think about it.

    • @apprenticemath
      @apprenticemath  8 месяцев назад +1

      Yeah that offset is key to it all

  • @johnzorenlabrador2926
    @johnzorenlabrador2926 5 лет назад +1

    How it became 16/128?

  • @margamarcos8986
    @margamarcos8986 6 лет назад

    Sir can you elaborate how you convert 2/16 to 16/128 tnx

    • @apprenticemath
      @apprenticemath  6 лет назад +1

      2/16 = 4/32 = 8/64 = 16/128
      - sorry about the long wait -

  • @apprenticemath
    @apprenticemath  12 лет назад

    Thanks a lot

  • @heronimousbrapson863
    @heronimousbrapson863 11 месяцев назад +1

    This is waaay easier to do in metric. Time to join the 21st century America!

  • @TitanTrond
    @TitanTrond 7 лет назад

    Thank you sir!

  • @QuantumBubble
    @QuantumBubble 11 лет назад

    Thanks, awesome video.

  • @acerondulnuan8650
    @acerondulnuan8650 5 лет назад

    Thanks alot sir😍

  • @KashifBhai527
    @KashifBhai527 7 лет назад

    Really Really nice....

  • @jonarbuckle1560
    @jonarbuckle1560 7 лет назад +1

    Holy cow. I got some unmarked calipers from a local hardware store. "import" ect
    Would I be correct in assuming if the number of hash marks/hair lines per inch on each scale is the same as these in the presentation, that I am dealing with 1/128 calipers? (This math is a mystery to me now)
    Intution says "yes"
    If so, these pieces of crap are acurate to .0005" with "rounding down"
    That is amazing!

    • @apprenticemath
      @apprenticemath  7 лет назад +2

      If marked the same way, then 1/128" it is, which = 0.0078", or 0.005" rounded down or 0.01" rounded up.
      Concept was invented in 1631 by French mathematician Pierre Vernier.

  • @احمدعلىناجىالبصيلى

    thank you

  • @blstrdbstrd
    @blstrdbstrd 11 лет назад

    Thank you!

  • @durenijo
    @durenijo 6 лет назад

    Excellent, thanks a lot :)

  • @markjosephvillanueva3093
    @markjosephvillanueva3093 7 лет назад

    thank you sir

  • @jorgedavila6445
    @jorgedavila6445 7 лет назад

    Thanks!

  • @claynguyen9377
    @claynguyen9377 8 лет назад

    thank you sir ! You really helped me out.

  • @moltedo37
    @moltedo37 11 месяцев назад +1

    4 inches, 3 shillings, 6 pence and a groat....

  • @raufmahar1576
    @raufmahar1576 10 лет назад

    NICE

  • @cesarsantos2702
    @cesarsantos2702 4 года назад

    muito bom!

  • @magnusklahr8190
    @magnusklahr8190 9 лет назад

    Why not mm? ;)

  • @707SonomaComa
    @707SonomaComa 4 года назад

    I CANNOT believe it took almost 13 minutes to explain that measurement was 3 19/128ths inches!

    • @scorbett4370
      @scorbett4370 2 года назад

      Teaching so students understand does take awhile.

  • @TimTimich_405
    @TimTimich_405 4 года назад

    thank you bat i think millimeters are more convenient

  • @TOONZiTO
    @TOONZiTO 10 лет назад +9

    im buying a digital one.

    • @apprenticemath
      @apprenticemath  10 лет назад

      imuteu Just watch for scratches and melting. Here is my favourite: ruclips.net/video/HjD63mWkd9M/видео.html

    • @frank2398
      @frank2398 6 лет назад +2

      Digital calipers are great. They are. But I still use my Brown and Sharpe 570's. (both 13" and 25") Both are easily 60 plus years old and the quality of them are just incredible. (the wooden boxes alone are gorgeous!) Most modern cheap Harbor Freight calipers are....good enough....I guess. Depending on what you what from them. But if you go with digital, go with Mitutoyo not Tool Shop. Actually, spend the money and buy much older Brown and Sharpe and Starrett. You'll never regret it. Learn to read the old manual tools. Not the modern Chinese crap.

  • @shikamaru31
    @shikamaru31 6 лет назад

    That marker has a squeaking sound

  • @aashikahamed111
    @aashikahamed111 2 года назад

    Imperial bearing dimension chart

  • @MM0SDK
    @MM0SDK 6 лет назад

    If it was metric we could see 49.25mm

    • @apprenticemath
      @apprenticemath  6 лет назад

      Probably right, I also have a Metric full version

  • @vijayakrishnannair
    @vijayakrishnannair 2 года назад

    👍

  • @garycarroll9447
    @garycarroll9447 10 дней назад

    Positive 0 error

  • @chikutaclinton8171
    @chikutaclinton8171 8 месяцев назад