What is the future of reproductive rights?

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 8 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 7

  • @beystan-by2po
    @beystan-by2po 6 месяцев назад +2

    The graphics and animations in this video are very nice. Whoever edited and put this all together did a great job!

  • @atown5422
    @atown5422 Год назад +1

    The dean of one the US’s leading schools of government blocked a position for the former head of Human Rights Watch (HRW) over his organisation’s criticism of Israel’s oppression of the Palestinians. The Harvard Kennedy School’s Carr Center for Human Rights Policy offered Kenneth Roth a position as a senior fellow shortly after he retired as director of HRW in April after 29 years. Roth is highly regarded within the human rights community for the part his organisation played in advances such as the creation of the international criminal court and the prosecution of major human rights abusers.

  • @sorryforus
    @sorryforus Год назад

    thanks for pleasure music

  • @rwnorris24
    @rwnorris24 2 года назад

    Yes. I failed a lot. Harvard is hard. However, I keep registering.
    -R.W.N II

  • @gabrieldias6430
    @gabrieldias6430 Год назад +1

    I cannot see any logical consequence between a person being sensitive towards the history and culture of their people and specifically having a degree in national history.
    In my sincere opinion, if we carefully examine the history of any country, we can clearly see that people were not in favor of abortions; this change began through heavy media propaganda and the deliberate sponsorship of big brands and foundations, like MacArthur.
    Their goal is clear: to create more compliant employees who desire nothing in life beyond work. Their means are also clear: alienate people using the media and branches of the constitution so that they can advance further and further with their death culture, to the point where people become so insensitive to this topic that a woman could kill her baby at 9 months of pregnancy.
    Also, I would suggest that everyone who uses the term "reproductive rights", for a matter of mental exercise, try to commute this term by "rights to kill your son", since it is a much honest terminology.