Restrictions on Transfer - Section 10,11 and 12 of TPA - YG Law

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 22 фев 2023
  • Ekdum no time waste quick explanation for Section 10,11 and 12 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882.
    Covers all points with explanations of the 3 sections.
    Link for My Full Course on TPA for Judiciary Aspirants:
    • Transfer of Property A...
    condition restraining alienation,transfer of property act 1882,transfer of property act,section 10 of transfer of property act,section 10 11 12 of transfer of property act,Restriction Repugnant to Interest Created,Conditions which Restrain the Alienation,Section 11 of transfer of property act,section 11 tpa,section 10 tpa,section 12 tpa,section 10-12 restrictions,Section 10 conditions,condition restraining alienation section 10,section 12 insolvency

Комментарии • 135

  • @sumananand8564
    @sumananand8564 Год назад +17

    Maine tpa already padh rakha hai but just because of YG LAW @ gaurav sir i am watching the series again and i have found ki sach me Gaurav sir se accha koi nhi padha sakta hai and i can't afford to miss any of your lectures sir.
    Huge respect for you sir🙏🏻

  • @meghamalik208
    @meghamalik208 10 месяцев назад +4

    Excellent videos, I secured First Division in my last 2 semesters thanks to your videos. Much love and gratitude.

  • @zabeehullah2446
    @zabeehullah2446 7 месяцев назад

    Thanks to you because of which you have explained the TPA sections very eloquently.

  • @sreenunaikmudavath3627
    @sreenunaikmudavath3627 9 месяцев назад +2

    Excellent inspiring lectures in all transfer of Property Act

  • @charllybond
    @charllybond 9 месяцев назад +4

    4:46 our teacher told us that here it says women except Hindu, Muslim and Buddhist (i.e Christian) . In Christian after marriage husband and wife are considered as one legal entity. So to protect the property of wife if such condition is put forth then it will be valid.

  • @padminivashishta7133
    @padminivashishta7133 Год назад +67

    You're wrong, exam kal nahi hai 2 ghnte baad hai!🙂

  • @rahuljakhiwal1101
    @rahuljakhiwal1101 Год назад +6

    Section 10 exception was there in British era.
    So christian men could get benifit from it by imposing condition on their women by transferring them property for their benefit.
    And women from other religion were given right to transfer property.
    Basically a classic example from Britishers of male chauvinism.
    SC revoked it and added christian women in this exception through landmark judgement of John Vallamattom & Anr vs Union Of India on 21 July, 2003.

    • @illusion5159
      @illusion5159 Год назад

      Thanks buddy..after researching your mentioned case law your answer is right 👍

  • @Smartpanda19
    @Smartpanda19 7 месяцев назад

    Your lectures are very helpful. Thank You very much. God bless you

  • @prashantpratap1446
    @prashantpratap1446 Месяц назад

    You have done a excellent job by making such a difficult course simplified.. watching your series for my LLB exams and it is so helpful.

  • @manishajamunkar3854
    @manishajamunkar3854 3 месяца назад

    Your lectures are very much helpful to understand topic easily.. Thank you🙏

  • @lavanyabhatt4882
    @lavanyabhatt4882 Год назад +11

    Hindu Muslim and Buddhist are not included because they already have their personal laws which deals with this provision, so TPA will not overrule or overlap with those provisions 4:44

    • @vedsworupdash5091
      @vedsworupdash5091 10 месяцев назад

      ***only women

    • @011yadav
      @011yadav 9 месяцев назад +1

      Aise yo Sikh and jain ke pass bhi h personal laws . Orr issuer agar aap kahoge ki vo to Hindus ke personal law m aate h to vo to Buddhist bhi aaye h fir unhe kyu mention kiya specifically.

  • @adv.anjali
    @adv.anjali 9 месяцев назад +4

    Oh My God😮 Apko kaise pata?!!!! 0:52 Sachhi kal Mera exam hai..
    And I'm so thankful to you for you simplest and easiest explanation...jese apne apke introduction video me bola tha.. once u understand u always remember it. Thankyou ❤

  • @jk3266
    @jk3266 8 месяцев назад

    Crystal clear explanation.

  • @rabiarafat430
    @rabiarafat430 6 месяцев назад +6

    Addition: Section 11's exception is based on the English case "Tulk v Moxhay" which laid down the principle of Restrictive Covenants which is mentioned in S.40 of TPA

  • @kritikasharma3440
    @kritikasharma3440 Год назад +5

    han mera exam 27th feb ko :p ...your videos are life saver ..thank you so much...

  • @rishirajchouhan6300
    @rishirajchouhan6300 4 месяца назад +1

    It should be noted that in section 11, the transfer of interest should be 'absolute', i.e. gift or sale. And so sec 11 does not apply to transfers such as leases or mortgages.

  • @jainendrapawar
    @jainendrapawar Год назад +1

    Fabulous job, nice video ❤🎉😊

  • @faizanhayat6888
    @faizanhayat6888 2 месяца назад

    Love from Pakistan. I'm studying law in International Islamic University, Islamabad. Sir video lectures are so fruitful.❤❤

  • @narendratanwar8733
    @narendratanwar8733 8 месяцев назад

    Great video, using for revision 👍👍👍

  • @rakeshbahadur8324
    @rakeshbahadur8324 10 месяцев назад

    Outstanding efforts

  • @ThatKanpurgirl
    @ThatKanpurgirl Год назад

    You are The best 💯

  • @user-rn8wy9uf2q
    @user-rn8wy9uf2q 7 месяцев назад

    very nice. Please make more videos on the further sections.😄WE HAVE EXAMS NEXT MONTH!!! YOU ARE OUR ONLY HOPE. SIR PLZZZZZZZZZZZZ

  • @faseehmorio8592
    @faseehmorio8592 8 месяцев назад

    Thanks a lot Sir
    Love from Pakistan

  • @parakram245
    @parakram245 10 месяцев назад

    nice n easy. thanks!

  • @anjalisaraf6117
    @anjalisaraf6117 10 месяцев назад

    Thank you so much sir 😊

  • @FathimaSk-li8ic
    @FathimaSk-li8ic 5 месяцев назад

    Thanku sir.. 👍

  • @shauryavardhansingh8530
    @shauryavardhansingh8530 Год назад

    thank you so much sir

  • @happyharikameekosam
    @happyharikameekosam 5 месяцев назад

    Thank you bro.

  • @debadityadutta6483
    @debadityadutta6483 Год назад

    thank you sir!

  • @137princyram3
    @137princyram3 10 месяцев назад

    Thank You Sir 😊

  • @falguni5727
    @falguni5727 8 месяцев назад

    very nice. Please make more videos on the further sections.😄

  • @pratikshamohanty60
    @pratikshamohanty60 2 месяца назад

    hello sir, i thoroughly love your videos, it really helps for fundamentals.
    one thing i want to convey-
    i just read in N. H. Jhabvala book the logic behind the exception of sec 10. it states that the exception embodies the doctrine of restraint in anticipation and is borrowed from english law, where such a restraint is recognized to protect a women against her husband. in India, it is intended that this exception should apply to those communities which follow english law. therefore, hindus, mohammedans and buddhists are not covered by this exception.

    • @yashveersinghyadav7777
      @yashveersinghyadav7777 Месяц назад

      TPA came into existence in 1882 and that time britishers didn't wanted to interfere in the matter of non-christian and specially women of this land who were either hindu, Muslim or Buddhist

  • @cheshtanarang7543
    @cheshtanarang7543 3 месяца назад

    Thankyou

  • @utkarshsharma8780
    @utkarshsharma8780 3 месяца назад

    ha, kl he hai

  • @AyushiVerma-fw3wp
    @AyushiVerma-fw3wp 6 месяцев назад

    Best!

  • @debomitabanerjee5760
    @debomitabanerjee5760 4 месяца назад

    Starting was great🤣❤️

  • @abhishekkona1049
    @abhishekkona1049 9 месяцев назад

    loved it

  • @Latha001
    @Latha001 Год назад

    Tq sir

  • @ayushkashyap2437
    @ayushkashyap2437 2 месяца назад

    Bhaut bdiya

  • @thatfreakinpotato
    @thatfreakinpotato Год назад

    Thakyouu bhaiyaaa

  • @dattatraykhiratkar9938
    @dattatraykhiratkar9938 2 месяца назад

    Great

  • @anaiyaeity1179
    @anaiyaeity1179 9 месяцев назад

    🙂thanks ❤

  • @aaryadandir4653
    @aaryadandir4653 Год назад

    great

  • @MANISHKUMAR-mn8kd
    @MANISHKUMAR-mn8kd Год назад

    Thank u so much sir kb tak complete ho jayega tpa sir

  • @prasannakumarsarangi7263
    @prasannakumarsarangi7263 18 дней назад

    Acha laga clear

  • @nomorepranav
    @nomorepranav 3 месяца назад

    the whole MNLU Mumbai is passing because of you

  • @NobodyPrime
    @NobodyPrime 4 месяца назад

    Love from Bangladesh 🇧🇩 YG sir 🤍

  • @R.Khandare....
    @R.Khandare.... Год назад

    Jabardast

  • @anjalisingh7109
    @anjalisingh7109 5 месяцев назад

    👌👌👌

  • @Krishjaiswal14
    @Krishjaiswal14 5 месяцев назад

    👍👍

  • @vishweshzarapkar9552
    @vishweshzarapkar9552 9 месяцев назад

    Best

  • @dhairyatyagi484
    @dhairyatyagi484 Год назад

    nice

  • @raghavgupta-gl3bj
    @raghavgupta-gl3bj 11 месяцев назад

    😂😂😂 savage. Sir u know sbka xam h kal👍🏻

  • @kumrayatish
    @kumrayatish 10 месяцев назад +1

    👌🏻🤙🏻

  • @insaniyat3599
    @insaniyat3599 5 месяцев назад

    👍

  • @pearl3334
    @pearl3334 Год назад

  • @scorpion96001
    @scorpion96001 5 месяцев назад +1

    4:46 Reason : Hindu Succession Act, 1956 governs the inheritance of a woman's property if she is Hindu, Muslim, Buddhist, jain or a sikh. If she is Muslim then Muhammaden Law governs. And if She is christian, parsi or any other religion then it will be governed by Indian Succession Act,1925

  • @rahulkakadrk9347
    @rahulkakadrk9347 6 месяцев назад +1

    1 hr ke bad exam he meri aur mai YG bhai ko dekh k ja rha abhi playlist khatam ki

  • @jitendrakumawat274
    @jitendrakumawat274 11 месяцев назад

    ❤❤❤

  • @siddharthsrivastava05
    @siddharthsrivastava05 Год назад

    SIR JI , ISKA PDF PROVIDE KAR DETE TO BAHUT MEHERBANI HOTI !!!

  • @akashprasad7820
    @akashprasad7820 Год назад +1

    The exception of Hindu Muslim and Buddhist women is given because they cannot alienate their property unilaterally since they are governed by their personal succession laws..

  • @midnightrains5744
    @midnightrains5744 2 месяца назад

    I think the exception to section 10 is because there already are personal laws for it. (Muslim law and Hindu law)

  • @cutebunny28
    @cutebunny28 10 месяцев назад

    Transfer to woman for her benefit means - ki husband apni property apni wife ko de rha hai with condition ki jb uska Baccha ho jaega to vo property usko chli jaegi or tb tk uski wife uss property ka enjoyment ly skti hai but vo kise another ko property nhi de skti or ye condition void nhi hogi kyounki vo proptery de rha hai jb tk wife hai tb tk vo property carry karegi life time uske baad unborn child agr vo exsistance Mei aa jata hai to pr vo aesa ni bol skta ki wife pro. Nhi de skti kese ko agr aesa hua to vo absolute condition hogi and that type of condition shall be void under sec.10 ❤

  • @kratisinghtomar9234
    @kratisinghtomar9234 2 месяца назад

    Section 10 exemption for women could be for christian woman as the law was made by the Britishers , it could be to have control on such property as they could have interest in such property.

  • @prashantchanne334
    @prashantchanne334 Год назад

    Sir wha women sc/ st ho skte h kya?

  • @ShabeerAhmed01
    @ShabeerAhmed01 8 месяцев назад

    Condition precendent :Agar shabeer yg law channel ke video dekh ke exam pass hojata toh property miljayegi

  • @shyambormarpan8117
    @shyambormarpan8117 Год назад +2

    hello bro. your approach in the subject is exceptionally brilliant .. keep it up ... is there anyway i can contact you over the phone. please do let me know. need some help.

    • @adv.anjali
      @adv.anjali 9 месяцев назад

      🙋🏻‍♀️

  • @shahzebkhan1909
    @shahzebkhan1909 Месяц назад

    the most funny thing that i found today was "mjhy pata hy kal tmhara exam hy na"

  • @snehal9777
    @snehal9777 8 месяцев назад

    yes i have my exams from tomorrow

  • @karankashyap9260
    @karankashyap9260 Год назад

    yes i have exam tomorrow

  • @shwetaverma-cv4ti
    @shwetaverma-cv4ti Год назад

    may be exception of sec 10 for the christian women

  • @Toshikajainorange_123
    @Toshikajainorange_123 Год назад +1

    Case law hai section 10 par John vallamatam vs UOI

  • @iqrabrohi4717
    @iqrabrohi4717 Год назад +1

    Muslim women exception isliye nh hai section 10 m k muslim law m esi koi restriction nh hai women k benefit k liye, women complete interest of property enjoy kr skti hai, or sec 2(d) of TP kehta hai k chptr 2 of TP any rule of muslim law ko affect nh kryga it means jo muslims laws TP sy phly force m aye hain wo wesy hi enforce hongen.....
    I think ye reasoning ho skti hai....
    If not you can guide me....

  • @skjubedhossain6546
    @skjubedhossain6546 9 месяцев назад

    ❤🎉❤

  • @radhikapatkar5923
    @radhikapatkar5923 11 месяцев назад

    Section 54 k baad?????

  • @killatakilla7907
    @killatakilla7907 2 месяца назад

    Section 10 ka exception angrez ke liye banaya hoga shayad.

  • @sayeedlives
    @sayeedlives 2 месяца назад +1

    Exam aaj hi hai kl nhi 😢

  • @saritanegi7554
    @saritanegi7554 Месяц назад

    Tpa 22/5/24

  • @shristykumari9
    @shristykumari9 4 месяца назад

    Sec 10 exception...I think its for those who married in another religion....if hindu wife is not hindu ,Muslim wife is not Muslim ......pls correct me if

  • @siyapandita9001
    @siyapandita9001 9 месяцев назад

    mann kar raha hai ki college mein rehte hi judiciary wala pack bhi lelu

  • @pranavverma1970
    @pranavverma1970 Год назад

    light hai

  • @jatinupadhyay8478
    @jatinupadhyay8478 2 месяца назад

    Kal ? Abhi 6 ghante baad hi hai.

  • @Ayushijain29
    @Ayushijain29 Год назад +1

    Kal nai😂 abhi 1 ghante baad hi hai😂😂

  • @ujjayaniroy7442
    @ujjayaniroy7442 11 дней назад

    Section 10(exception)hindu muslim ka alag law hein like succession laws sayad iss liye unmay applicable nahi hein

  • @gouthamkumarg2153
    @gouthamkumarg2153 Год назад

    the wonderful land of shaguna biwi

  • @anjalianjali3081
    @anjalianjali3081 Месяц назад

    One night before exam 😢

  • @shivampatel7876
    @shivampatel7876 8 месяцев назад

    Repugnant ki meaning to bta sakte the

  • @chandanmahapatra9481
    @chandanmahapatra9481 5 месяцев назад

    Reason behind a restraint for married woman except hindu, muslim or buddhist is to safeguard the interest of the married woman who could be easily exploited by their husband.

  • @devrathuniyal
    @devrathuniyal 11 месяцев назад

    YG law does not responds to given whatsApp no even after 24 hours...

    • @YGLAW
      @YGLAW  11 месяцев назад

      2 things
      1st: maine bola nahi kabhi ki 24 hour reply guarantee hai
      2nd: i didnt reply becaue you want to buy just the notes and that is because you dont want to pay for the full course, also you want to pay via upi and want notes on whatsapp, i never offered any such service in any of the videos
      Jo main offer kar raha hu woh khareedna ho tou khareedo bhai, nahi khareedna tou matt khareedo, i dont make a la carte packs for anyone, i am running a coaching business, some of you need to understand that naukar thodi na hu aapka main, do you even call other institutes and demand such services ? And do they entertain you personally or they divert you to a useless customer care executive.
      Koi seedha direct baat bhi nahi karta mere jaise, so at least have some decency and common sense while messaging

  • @DJ58126
    @DJ58126 9 месяцев назад

    hey, I have got the reason why its written - (not hindu, Muhammedan or Buddhist )

    • @YGLAW
      @YGLAW  9 месяцев назад +1

      Tou bata do bhai suspense kyu bana rahee ho 😅

  • @Sradha-ik1lj
    @Sradha-ik1lj Год назад +1

    4:50 sir here I think (though I'm not sure,just saying) that since now hindu Buddhist women hold property as absolute owner (prior to HSA,1956- they used to hold property as a limited owner which vested on survivors upon her death according to rule of survivorship). Therefore, no absolute condition can be imposed.
    But here again question arises
    This Act enacted in the year 1882 and transfer to someone for the benefit of the woman - in these 2 cases ye upar wala reasoning baith nahi raha hai..
    I just put my thoughts here, don't know whether it's a foolish reasoning or not 😂 maaf kariyega 😂

    • @YGLAW
      @YGLAW  Год назад +2

      Koi reasoning hai he nahi bhai concrete, maine khub dhoondha, dont know if your reasoning is foolish or not, but at least you are using your mind to form some reasoning, that is good enough for me, appreciate that.

    • @Sradha-ik1lj
      @Sradha-ik1lj Год назад +1

      @@YGLAW haha never expected such a quick reply!! Thanks for ur response..
      Ye obsolete ho gaya hai, it should be removed now.

  • @adv.shivgupta
    @adv.shivgupta 2 месяца назад

    0:52 MERA EXAM KL NAHI H 4 DIN BAAD HAI

  • @angliaftab6702
    @angliaftab6702 Год назад

    G exams hain woh bhi Ramadan mn 🤕

  • @lawfection
    @lawfection 2 месяца назад

    sir aaj hi exam hai

  • @khushbooupadhyay7891
    @khushbooupadhyay7891 5 месяцев назад

    Ha kal hi h exam 😢

  • @krantigaynar6149
    @krantigaynar6149 Год назад

    Ji mera exam sachi mai kal hai sir🥲

  • @saulgoodman124
    @saulgoodman124 3 месяца назад

    Sir Kall chodo ,, 6 ghante baad hai exam

  • @colourful_Duo
    @colourful_Duo 3 месяца назад

    Hn sir hn mera kl exam haiii...😂

  • @Jn9595
    @Jn9595 Месяц назад

    Is anyone here preparing for judiciary?

  • @tusharsharma3811
    @tusharsharma3811 11 месяцев назад

    Aaj hi hai exam