But VAR has taken the game back 30 years. Remember how relieved we were at "giving the benefit of the doubt to the attacker" in narrow offside decisions? That helped save the game too after the dismal early 90s. Now though, we are back to 90s offsides with the added misery of having to sit through 5 minute VAR checks and not being able to truly celebrate goals. The game was saved but is now being killed again.
@@azzamohammed5460 It used to be you could pass to your own goalkeeper and he could pick up the ball with his hands. That made it very easy to kill attacks and waste time. Now it's illegal, at least if the pass comes from your foot. If you head the ball to your goalkeeper, or he gets it from an opponent, or you just deflect it, then he can handle it. They made this rule change in 1992.
90 ofisde rules were not about the benefit ouf the doubt. Until92 The whole body of every player must be behind the last defender.The whole body of alla olayers not just from the player who take the ball.
True, but to be fair, then Denmark did beat Yugoslavia 2-1 away in Belgrade in the qualifiers and at any other Euro qualifiers that has been played since then, Denmark would also have qualified for the finals as the very best of the 2nd placed teams.
@@agffans5725 not complete truth. Denmark did beat Yugoslavia away 2:1, but in Denmark Yugoslavia won 2:0. Also, the narative "in any other later format they would qualify" is moot point, because we are talking about 1992 Euro, and for that particular contest they didn't qualify.
@@agffans5725 To be fair you should mention that Yugoslavia won every match at that qualification group very clearly and quite easy including match against Denmark in Copenhagen by 2-0. At moment when Denmark won against Yugoslavia all was very set already, including goal difference what was near to be double higher on Yugoslavian side comparing to Denmark as runner up. That was great Yugo squad, few years earlier they won World cup U21 and was truly favorit on that EM but was banned for political reasons.(we know UEFA donnt allow mixing politics and sport, true?..yeah...depending who gives order..)
@@sasamackic .. It's simply not true that everything had already been settled by then. There were still 3 games left for Yugoslavia, the last of them being an away game vs. Austria that Yugoslavia could not afford to lose. Truth of the matter is that both Yugoslavia and Denmark only lost 1 game each, Denmark at home to Yugoslavia and Yugoslavia at home to Denmark, which just show how evenly matched they actually were. As for being fair, then I have never seen anyone being fair to mention that Denmark only lost 1 game in the qualifiers and actually won the away game and was by far the best of the teams that had not qualified. Back then the foreign media were all speculating in UEFA giving Italy the last spot, which would have been highly unfair had it happened. The usual narrative seem to be that Denmark did not at all deserve to go, and that the whole thing was a "miracle". Which really it was not. Of the teams that had actually qualified (from a 5 team group), Denmark picked up more points than Scotland and just as many as the Netherlands and the Soviet Union and in compare with all the 2nd placed teams that so had missed out, including Italy and Portugal, then Denmark clearly had done much better. the only "miracle" about Denmark being able to win the Euro-92 is that they did it "right of the beach" and totally unprepared. Denmark also went straight on to win the 1995 FIFA Confederation Cup by beating Argentina 2-0 in the Final. So it's a total "myth" that if Denmark could win the Euro-92, not having qualified, then everything can happen and everyone got the chance to win.
@@agffans5725 Boy, two of that 3 last games were against Faroe islands which Yugo team easily won with 9-0 difference. There were no doubt at all about result of those games. Only doubt cold be they were sendt home with 7 ,9 10 or 12 goals in net. That Austria you mention as possibly dangerous match for Yugoslavia was sent home with 6-1 goal difference. Can you se any doubt about winner there?? I can not. Denmark end up on second place, that is all. Yugoslavia won group and should play Euro wgatever finaly result at Euro should be. Denmark had a solid team, but was runner up. Winner should play Euro.That is what I say. Mixing politics in that was very dirty business. Yugo team was already in Sweden but was pressed to leave. All was done to avoid Yugoslavian team play Euro because political interests of most powerfull countries in world. If you donnt know, is not first time it happen. 1973 just two months after coup d etat in Chile, when country was in chaos, USSR should play decisive match against Chile in Santiago. USSR insisted to play on neutral ground or at least on other stadion because thousands of prisoners were kept at stadion. Hundreds killed even buried there and tortured. FIFA send comitee to clear situation an called stadion acceptable even thousends of prisoners were on it! They organised charade when 15000 spectators came, started game, Chile scored on empty goal with no opponents and declared Chile for winner. So much about some countries get banned and other awarded. Just winner from pitch counts, rest is charade.
@@iBhacaBeats So if the opposing player has a heart attack like what happened to Eriksen, but you choose to continue the match and take advantage of the situation because the opponent chooses to try to save his friend's life, and manages to score a goal...is that okay? Because it's not against the rules.. There are always weaknesses in the rules, that's why fairplay is needed...all teams can do it, but not all teams do it, because not all teams are cowardly and shameless like this team
From what I read it was only starting in the 80’s or so that teams got more defensive and played more cynically to maintain advantages or try their luck in the shootouts, Italia ‘90 and Euros ‘92 were pretty much the nadir of this style of play, Italia ‘90 still holds the record for lowest goals per match average because of teams like Ireland and Argentina playing overly defensive and getting through on penalties, Ireland made it to quarter-finals without winning a game and Argentina only scored five goals on their route to the final.
ALL the teams made the backpass all the time before 1993. Watch the semifinal Netherlands v Denmark, and say again that Denmark backpassed their way to the trophy. It just isn't true. Anyone coming up against an attacking machine working as well as Germany during that final would have used an extra backpass or two. Simply because it was a part of football. Germany in this euro final is probably one of the best ever performances by a losing team in a final. Schmeichel during this final...best performance ever by a goalkeeper in a single game.
That's the point, everyone can do it if they want..but others still have shame to do something like that. If all teams were cowards like this, then the backpass rules would have been changed long before this.
@@azzamohammed5460 the backpass rule states that a goalkeeper cannot pick up a ball in their box that has been intentionally kicked back to them by their teammate. Breaking this rule will result in an indirect free kick being awarded to the opposition. A player will also be penalised with a yellow card for “time-wasting” or “persistent infringement of laws of the game” if they use trickery to try to circumvent the backpass rule (ie: flicking the ball up and heading it back to your goalkeeper). What constitutes trickery is pretty broad and probably didn’t capture all possible scenarios in circumventing the backpass rule when it was introduced, I know in the FIFA games I played when I wanted to play cynically and defensive I used to kick back to a defender and get them to do a header back to the keeper who would pick it up, don’t know if a referee would call that for trickery in a real match but I imagine a well-versed referee would call me up on it and award an indirect free kick.
Exactly, it's amazing. The stats say England dominated. Harry Kane should have had a penalty and Denmark's free kick was a dive. End of discussion as far as I'm concerned.
@@Frserthegreenengine Argentina only scored *FIVE* goals to get to the World Cup final, still the lowest number of goals for any Finalist below Spain who set the record for the lowest number of goals to win a World Cup with eight. Amazingly at the next World Cup, Oleg Salenko would score the same number of goals as Argentina did in 1990, but in a single game.
Fato, eles fizeram isso consecutivamente, porém muitos fizeram isso tempo atrás em momentos que essa regra ia influenciar, própria copa se 70 o Brasil.
Everybody did it back then... so what if they are doing backpasses and time-wasting for 3 minutes in the last 10 minutes, when they are up 2-0 BTW. It is similar to modern day players who uses 30 seconds to take a throw in or players who takes a minute to set the ball back in play from an offside or a freekick. Besides all that, there is a huge amount of diving and faking injuries.
@WINNER but the result is that american football is incredibly boring to watch, cause its 60% non game time 40% game time, where as in football we just add the time spent doing stuff like throw ins to the end of the game.
It's not similar. It's a lot worse, because it couldn't even be compensated in extra time, like substitutions and fake injuries nowadays. The back pass was the real anti football.
@@bronzieboy foreal bro nfl games go on for what feels like 3 hours… especially with the fact that its stop-start-stop-start for literally the whole game
LIVARPOOL WORST TEAM IN EXISTENCE 1 LEAGUE TITLE IN 30 YEARS AND APPARENTLY THERE THE BEST TEAM EVER. STFU LOSERFOOLS. PENALAH DIVING FLOP 🤣🤡😂🤣🤡😂🤣🤡😂🤣CHEATING BASTARDS
Honestly it's a rules problem rather than a player/team issue, and it was fixed as a rule problem. Yeah it's not fun to watch, but the players aren't there to be fun to watch, they are there to win. I support this rule being changed, but I also don't fault anyone for exploiting the rule until it was changed, you do what you got to do to win.
The rule change was and is great for football no doubt. That being said, this was perfectly legal, and you have to keep in mind that Denmark is the smallest nation to ever win the Euro's. Why did they do this? There are more registered footballers in Germany, than there are people in Denmark lol
This 'country X has more footballers than country V has citizens' argument is a pretty stupid one. Football is the most popular sport in Denmark and they had a golden generation back then. Greece's success in 2004 was quite a bit more impressive. Czech also had a really good shot at the title in 1996. Both countries have in common that football is popular but not the 'national sport'.
@@HonkiDonki this was not Denmark's golden generation - that had been six to eight years earlier and that team attacked all the time but won nothing. I guess this inferior team learned from their countrymen's errors in matches against the likes Spain and Romania in the 80s, by continuing to attack when they already had leads.
Well, backpass made the game boring and was a total waste of time but they didn't score goals due to backpass. They still beat Germany fair and square in accordance to the rules of the game.
sorry i dont fully know the rule. but if a defender backpass to the keeper and its been intercept by opponent striker that was in an "offside" position, will it count as offside? say, if they put 1 guy just to mark the goalkeeper
Less than a minute were wasted with this rule, and yet people bitch and complain, now a days people just run to the corner flag and physically keep everyone away, wasting several minutes on throw ins, corner kicks, freekicks etc. How is that better?
It’s orders of magnitude better since the game is still in play in those situations and the other team can steal it. When the keeper handled the ball there was nothing anyone could do. The other team had 0% chance of recovering it. Also: less than a minute? In an Ireland vs Egypt game in the 1990 WC the Irish keeper picked up a back pass and didn’t release it for SIX MINUTES! But sure, trying to guard the ball in play near the corner is exactly the same. Sure.
Yeah awful - Danes only knocked out France Holland and Germany scoring 6 goals along the way to winning the whole tournament - meanwhile England and France with all there talent score 3 goals between them and clear off home in the group stage 🤔
As a Dane that celebrated this win in 92, I'm glad I was only 9 and didn't know how awful the match was 😅 But you know, thinking about it, it feels like the audience gets to participate in a way, letting their discontent heard and felt by the opposing team that what they're doing is contemptable and cowardly, so even if it seems like a good thing that they changed the rules, it'd probably make for better watercooler conversation the following days.
That game was in no way awful at all. THis here shows ONE minute of backpasses in a 90 minute high intensity game. It's likely posted by another clueless person with no knowledge about the game.
@@eidodkwell. True and not true. The time wasting was absolutely insane but the Danes scored two (one of them illegally) and Germany none. So fair play to them but that this was allowed is just funny to me now
Thats how Denmark won the trophy so coward playing. The Statistics was that hey hold the ball like this for 26min. Player to Goaly, Goaly to hand. Goaly to player. Which was Smichael
@@formalist6096 A trophy without passing the group stages . And take a place of a team who disqualified and the way how you took it. Doest make a trophy which is deserved from a proud National team. That's how since then and now or in the future you will never have another one because that's was the only way and irony of destiny to have the only single "trophy" lmao. 😭 So keep dreaming for next 100 years for another cup.
@@formalist6096 And the Greece have one I'm half Greek . But at least we deserved it in every way we played. We gave the heart in field. If Greece would win this trophy like Denmark. I would never be so proud of count that one. Shame shame ..
@@amoghkt3568 But it was not because of this game! The back pass rule was introduced in 1992 to discourage time wasting and unduly defensive play after the 1990 World Cup.
I would tackle the shit out of the opponents. Red card would be a certainty, but at least I wouldn't allow to mock me like that. You like to play like that fine, go spend 3 months for a broken leg.
I didnt like german football teams, almost always chear against...they always somehow won against Yugoslavian teams I did support. First WC I remember 1974, I loved to se Holland, and Germans somehow won over them. Makes me cry.. But one thing is sure- They play quite clear and fair football, they did not make this backpass dirty play.
No they wouldn't, and they didn't. This tactic wasn't widespread, and was considered very dirty. This Euro final basically cemented the need for a rule change.
Chill... they won the game. This is how you play football if you want to be salty or not. Denmark were playing germany it was smart stop being toxic they did something incredible
@@jojoduciel tbf we shouldn't win when you compare our players to the players of other european nations. so i highly doubt it has anything to do with the rule change, and more so to do with the fact that we are simply not good enough at football, and even in 92 we weren't supposed to have qualified, we got in on a technicality. BUT nonetheless what we accomplished is nothing short of extraordinary.
One minute of backpasses in a 90 minute game. The main difference between an NFL game and a football game is that it's 90 minutes of gametime vs 17 minutes of effective gametime in the NFL game.... Lookup the 2024 superbowl statistics, and see how much effective gametime there is in a 4 hour game night... It's 17 minutes... The rest is commercials and highlight clips.
@@graceyudha Not this specifically, the rule had passed through Fifa at this point and the Danish national team made a point of abusing the rule in its last ever game in place. But yes, if you meant the essence of what was happening in the video then that was the reason for the removal of the rule
So, that was one entire minute? That must have decided the match. I know it wasn´t pretty but every team did it back then, if germany had been in front and they were the underdogs they would have done the same thing. And still, its one minute of the game, it didnt change much if anything
Please, let's get some perspective here: This video makes it look as if Denmark were doing this the entire match..! For anyone (like myself) who has actually watched the match, you will know that was not the case! That's why the video only lasts 1:02min because that's the total time Denmark "wasted" out of 90min..! That makes it just over 1% of the entire match, which is nothing!!! Yes they relied mainly on counter attacks, and yes they did waste a little time mainly at the end of the match when they were 2-0 up. But let's not forget Denmark were massive underdogs, playing the current World Champions in their first ever major final! Stop this nonsense and give Denmark the credit and respect they deserve for winning EURO92, playing some entertaining football as well along the way (watch semifinal vs Holland). This video is a complete mis-representation of the match and Denmark's achievement as a whole, which is a shame.
Happy to address this: 1) The video doesn't make it "look as if Denmark were doing this the entire match". Most people realise that this sort of thing happened late in a game to keep the result safe. 2) 1 minute of a football match is not "nothing" at all! Plenty can happen inside a minute. 3) It's not nonsense, it doesn't make any judgement on Denmark or their achievement (which was exceptional, obviously) 4) It doesn't misrepresent anything! This was exactly the sort of (legal) timewasting that led to the Laws of the Game being changed in 1992.
Спорт
A must see video for all those who feel nostalgic about classic football. The new rule about backpass saved the game
I still don't understand the rule. Explain please.
But VAR has taken the game back 30 years. Remember how relieved we were at "giving the benefit of the doubt to the attacker" in narrow offside decisions? That helped save the game too after the dismal early 90s.
Now though, we are back to 90s offsides with the added misery of having to sit through 5 minute VAR checks and not being able to truly celebrate goals. The game was saved but is now being killed again.
Glad they changed it because teams who just wanted a draw or was winning a game would use this alot it totally ruined alot of games
@@azzamohammed5460 It used to be you could pass to your own goalkeeper and he could pick up the ball with his hands. That made it very easy to kill attacks and waste time. Now it's illegal, at least if the pass comes from your foot. If you head the ball to your goalkeeper, or he gets it from an opponent, or you just deflect it, then he can handle it. They made this rule change in 1992.
90 ofisde rules were not about the benefit ouf the doubt. Until92 The whole body of every player must be behind the last defender.The whole body of alla olayers not just from the player who take the ball.
Imagine 2 minutes of goal & 88 minutes of this! 😂😂😂😂
Chelsea under Mourinho 😂
Sheesh I didn't remember it was this horrible.... for once FIFA did something right!
IFAB, not FIFA
Richard Gadsden it’s FIFA, FIFA are the ones holding these world cups and shit. It’s not just a game you know, but you’re probably to young to realize
@@ainesosa IFAB are the ones who set the rules. FIFA are just the body that organise the game based on them rules
obviously rigged game
@@ainesosa Or you are the one who doesn't understand that the IFAB decides the laws of the game, not FIFA
Diego Simeone and Jose Mourinho would be happy if this rules did not change. They can score early and backpass to Goalkeeper till 90th minute.
Mourinho's Chelsea had a better goal difference than The Invencibles
ATM would win UCL already 😂
You saw this in every single match before the backpass law
So if the goal happen in 5 minutes. We will see this for 85 minutes rest of the game.
Or you can just pressure the defense . Either way this was stupid
@@heroisdomar4248 ya pressure the defence then when the counter attack hits 😩
Yes, crappy teams would do that all the time.
Dear Arfran Caesar: It was said that "A thousand-mile journey begins with one step."
EVS says that fifty-one-thousand seconds tick down one at a time.
Luckily that didn't happen much at all and by 1993 backpassing was removed
Fun fact Danmark did not even qualify to the euro that year, but becouse yugoslavia was at war they proced to the competition
True, but to be fair, then Denmark did beat Yugoslavia 2-1 away in Belgrade in the qualifiers and at any other Euro qualifiers that has been played since then, Denmark would also have qualified for the finals as the very best of the 2nd placed teams.
@@agffans5725 not complete truth. Denmark did beat Yugoslavia away 2:1, but in Denmark Yugoslavia won 2:0. Also, the narative "in any other later format they would qualify" is moot point, because we are talking about 1992 Euro, and for that particular contest they didn't qualify.
@@agffans5725 To be fair you should mention that Yugoslavia won every match at that qualification group very clearly and quite easy including match against Denmark in Copenhagen by 2-0. At moment when Denmark won against Yugoslavia all was very set already, including goal difference what was near to be double higher on Yugoslavian side comparing to Denmark as runner up. That was great Yugo squad, few years earlier they won World cup U21 and was truly favorit on that EM but was banned for political reasons.(we know UEFA donnt allow mixing politics and sport, true?..yeah...depending who gives order..)
@@sasamackic .. It's simply not true that everything had already been settled by then. There were still 3 games left for Yugoslavia, the last of them being an away game vs. Austria that Yugoslavia could not afford to lose. Truth of the matter is that both Yugoslavia and Denmark only lost 1 game each, Denmark at home to Yugoslavia and Yugoslavia at home to Denmark, which just show how evenly matched they actually were.
As for being fair, then I have never seen anyone being fair to mention that Denmark only lost 1 game in the qualifiers and actually won the away game and was by far the best of the teams that had not qualified. Back then the foreign media were all speculating in UEFA giving Italy the last spot, which would have been highly unfair had it happened. The usual narrative seem to be that Denmark did not at all deserve to go, and that the whole thing was a "miracle". Which really it was not.
Of the teams that had actually qualified (from a 5 team group), Denmark picked up more points than Scotland and just as many as the Netherlands and the Soviet Union and in compare with all the 2nd placed teams that so had missed out, including Italy and Portugal, then Denmark clearly had done much better. the only "miracle" about Denmark being able to win the Euro-92 is that they did it "right of the beach" and totally unprepared. Denmark also went straight on to win the 1995 FIFA Confederation Cup by beating Argentina 2-0 in the Final. So it's a total "myth" that if Denmark could win the Euro-92, not having qualified, then everything can happen and everyone got the chance to win.
@@agffans5725 Boy, two of that 3 last games were against Faroe islands which Yugo team easily won with 9-0 difference. There were no doubt at all about result of those games. Only doubt cold be they were sendt home with 7 ,9 10 or 12 goals in net. That Austria you mention as possibly dangerous match for Yugoslavia was sent home with 6-1 goal difference. Can you se any doubt about winner there?? I can not.
Denmark end up on second place, that is all. Yugoslavia won group and should play Euro wgatever finaly result at Euro should be.
Denmark had a solid team, but was runner up. Winner should play Euro.That is what I say.
Mixing politics in that was very dirty business. Yugo team was already in Sweden but was pressed to leave. All was done to avoid Yugoslavian team play Euro because political interests of most powerfull countries in world.
If you donnt know, is not first time it happen. 1973 just two months after coup d etat in Chile, when country was in chaos, USSR should play decisive match against Chile in Santiago. USSR insisted to play on neutral ground or at least on other stadion because thousands of prisoners were kept at stadion. Hundreds killed even buried there and tortured. FIFA send comitee to clear situation an called stadion acceptable even thousends of prisoners were on it! They organised charade when 15000 spectators came, started game, Chile scored on empty goal with no opponents and declared Chile for winner.
So much about some countries get banned and other awarded.
Just winner from pitch counts, rest is charade.
This 1 minute sums up the entire Italia 90' World Cup.
It was the 1992 Euros
@@Harun-hr4em yeh he knows that. He's saying that this was also what the 1990 world cup was like🤦♂
this is the real anti Football
yannis korinthos 🧂🧂🧂
It was anti football after the rule was introduced. They were playing by the book
@@iBhacaBeats So if the opposing player has a heart attack like what happened to Eriksen, but you choose to continue the match and take advantage of the situation because the opponent chooses to try to save his friend's life, and manages to score a goal...is that okay? Because it's not against the rules..
There are always weaknesses in the rules, that's why fairplay is needed...all teams can do it, but not all teams do it, because not all teams are cowardly and shameless like this team
En ese tiempo no se aplicaba la nueva norma
I wonder how no team expose this enough that almost 100 years after they play football, we got back pass rule
From what I read it was only starting in the 80’s or so that teams got more defensive and played more cynically to maintain advantages or try their luck in the shootouts, Italia ‘90 and Euros ‘92 were pretty much the nadir of this style of play, Italia ‘90 still holds the record for lowest goals per match average because of teams like Ireland and Argentina playing overly defensive and getting through on penalties, Ireland made it to quarter-finals without winning a game and Argentina only scored five goals on their route to the final.
In the early days there was a degree of sportsmanship which decreased as more money came into the game
A few decades before this, they are basically assaulting keepers with ball in hand it was wild.
sad to see Schmeichel as part of it
There was a lot of other world class ballers on that team
When ball is played back the goalie must take it or should he just let it roll in to the net?
@@__magnusss__ hahaha he won the cup. Schmeichel is a legend fuck you simp
Why would you not do this? It is only stupid of you to not do this if you are up. Germany would do the same if they were up in the final
@@torbenspangler7648you can not take it in your hands now. Only kick it with your feet
*score once and then waste time infinitely*
As a matter of fact, It was a big Shame
Jose Mourinho entered this chat
Gold!
and then score twice!
It was like a golden goal rule for normal time.
One of the few rule chamges that FIFA got right was the backpass ban. You forget just how bad some of the time wasting was back then.
Can't believe this shit existed for so long
People forget how crap the old rile was. Hard to believe blokes like Howard Wilkinson could defend it so much at the time.
It was Leeds only tactic, pass back to their keeper then lump it up top winning the second balls
Lovely
Borak Borak Botak + brings me here.
Jorgino would be enyoying this all his 90 minutes 😂
ALL the teams made the backpass all the time before 1993. Watch the semifinal Netherlands v Denmark, and say again that Denmark backpassed their way to the trophy. It just isn't true. Anyone coming up against an attacking machine working as well as Germany during that final would have used an extra backpass or two. Simply because it was a part of football. Germany in this euro final is probably one of the best ever performances by a losing team in a final.
Schmeichel during this final...best performance ever by a goalkeeper in a single game.
Liverpool in the 80s
I forgot how terrible this was until the back pass law came into play
The game's gone!
All eight competing teams were allowed to pass back aswell. Well done Denmark on winning the tournament . You deserved it
That's the point, everyone can do it if they want..but others still have shame to do something like that.
If all teams were cowards like this, then the backpass rules would have been changed long before this.
To Kfem 80: Classic: The same for all: Be better -- then, avail opportunities to exploit!
And people accuse Greece 2004 of playing anti-football. People truly are hypocrites
the rule change were already decided before this euros.
Ali Ece brought me here :)
So this is the famous back pass merchant
This shows what trollers in football games are
Imagine there were dinosaurs defending this rule.
Can you explain the rule please. I don't understand it.
@@azzamohammed5460 the backpass rule states that a goalkeeper cannot pick up a ball in their box that has been intentionally kicked back to them by their teammate. Breaking this rule will result in an indirect free kick being awarded to the opposition.
A player will also be penalised with a yellow card for “time-wasting” or “persistent infringement of laws of the game” if they use trickery to try to circumvent the backpass rule (ie: flicking the ball up and heading it back to your goalkeeper). What constitutes trickery is pretty broad and probably didn’t capture all possible scenarios in circumventing the backpass rule when it was introduced, I know in the FIFA games I played when I wanted to play cynically and defensive I used to kick back to a defender and get them to do a header back to the keeper who would pick it up, don’t know if a referee would call that for trickery in a real match but I imagine a well-versed referee would call me up on it and award an indirect free kick.
@@andrewburgemeister6684 thank you so much man. Really been wanting to understand this rule for over two months. Thank you for simplifying it so much.
@@azzamohammed5460 my pleasure! 😊
Sad to see Denmark getting the stick for something every team ever was doing in that tournament
Thank God the rules were changed!
now england beat them and people crying 😭
Exactly, it's amazing. The stats say England dominated. Harry Kane should have had a penalty and Denmark's free kick was a dive. End of discussion as far as I'm concerned.
And now Italy beat England
@@geologyisntarealscience4059 🗿
Denmark won something more recent than England did. England fans been crying since 66
clearly a sterling dive
Looks so silly now. But to be fair, no team did it that bad. That perhaps the worst/best example.
Argentina (and a few other sides) did it a lot in the 1990 World Cup.
You obviously didnt see the World cup in 1990.
@@Frserthegreenengine Argentina only scored *FIVE* goals to get to the World Cup final, still the lowest number of goals for any Finalist below Spain who set the record for the lowest number of goals to win a World Cup with eight.
Amazingly at the next World Cup, Oleg Salenko would score the same number of goals as Argentina did in 1990, but in a single game.
Zosimar brought me here..thank you black Rambo
This was probably the only rule that was passed in the last 30 plus years that was good.
Richard Møller Nielsen masterclass
YJR bought me here
Pretty much man city just slightly more movement from left to right, until you're forced to lay off them.
Se essa regra tivesse desde os primórdios do futebol mundial, talvez seria diferente os resultados hoje em dia, justos campeões.
Fato, eles fizeram isso consecutivamente, porém muitos fizeram isso tempo atrás em momentos que essa regra ia influenciar, própria copa se 70 o Brasil.
Everybody did it back then... so what if they are doing backpasses and time-wasting for 3 minutes in the last 10 minutes, when they are up 2-0 BTW. It is similar to modern day players who uses 30 seconds to take a throw in or players who takes a minute to set the ball back in play from an offside or a freekick. Besides all that, there is a huge amount of diving and faking injuries.
Players were playing by book. The book allowed it.
@WINNER but the result is that american football is incredibly boring to watch, cause its 60% non game time 40% game time, where as in football we just add the time spent doing stuff like throw ins to the end of the game.
It's not similar. It's a lot worse, because it couldn't even be compensated in extra time, like substitutions and fake injuries nowadays. The back pass was the real anti football.
@@bronzieboy foreal bro nfl games go on for what feels like 3 hours… especially with the fact that its stop-start-stop-start for literally the whole game
Trust me nobody uses 30 seconds to take a throw in
People acting like footballers today don't do the exact same by feigning injuries, standing in the corner flag, etc.
This's why liverpool have a lots of EPL trophies in that era...! This was their playing style.😂
and you won loads of trophies in the era that you bought the refs
another idiots man united fans
LIVARPOOL WORST TEAM IN EXISTENCE 1 LEAGUE TITLE IN 30 YEARS AND APPARENTLY THERE THE BEST TEAM EVER. STFU LOSERFOOLS. PENALAH DIVING FLOP 🤣🤡😂🤣🤡😂🤣🤡😂🤣CHEATING BASTARDS
@@shush_schmuck42 you'll never visit Manchester in your life lose the false support
@@shush_schmuck42 have you seen a doctor lately?
There is nothing wrong. You can and should take advantage of rules.
Sure even if it kills the very essence of the game... correct?
.
Even an under 17 team can draw a match like this
Honestly it's a rules problem rather than a player/team issue, and it was fixed as a rule problem.
Yeah it's not fun to watch, but the players aren't there to be fun to watch, they are there to win.
I support this rule being changed, but I also don't fault anyone for exploiting the rule until it was changed, you do what you got to do to win.
@@NATIK001 basically if killing was allowed on the game ...u would have been okay with that too
@@Saurabhrkohardy Because that would surely happen....
@@NATIK001 hypothetically if it does.. and someone actually use it
.
There will be clown crazy fans who will be okay with it
bro posted 1 minute and we are supposed to think its the whole game
best glitch
El Sombrero brought me here
Beautiful
The rule change was and is great for football no doubt. That being said, this was perfectly legal, and you have to keep in mind that Denmark is the smallest nation to ever win the Euro's. Why did they do this? There are more registered footballers in Germany, than there are people in Denmark lol
This 'country X has more footballers than country V has citizens' argument is a pretty stupid one. Football is the most popular sport in Denmark and they had a golden generation back then. Greece's success in 2004 was quite a bit more impressive. Czech also had a really good shot at the title in 1996. Both countries have in common that football is popular but not the 'national sport'.
@@HonkiDonki this was not Denmark's golden generation - that had been six to eight years earlier and that team attacked all the time but won nothing.
I guess this inferior team learned from their countrymen's errors in matches against the likes Spain and Romania in the 80s, by continuing to attack when they already had leads.
Anyone here after yjr's video? 😂
Hey man! Don't expose us like that 🤣😇
Jose Mourinho watch this video every night before bed. So satisfied
and they say england is the worst
Yes because England haven’t won anything except a rigged World Cup.
α ρε Θεμη
Well, backpass made the game boring and was a total waste of time but they didn't score goals due to backpass. They still beat Germany fair and square in accordance to the rules of the game.
Feichang meiyou shenme daoli haoxiang
idk this isent any worse then now. goalkeepers waiting for the striker to push him and then to collect the ball from a fail ball througe or a bad pass
Love those tears in the comments section😂😂😂
Excellent strategy, congratulations Denmark 🏆
No this is coward gameplay 🤣
@@0𝖂𝖆𝖓𝕷𝖚𝖖𝖒𝖆𝖓0 every other team did it aswell. Obviously the one who scored first were the ones ahead
Seriously? good strategy? this is the trashiest strategy ever all clayball lovers. many people pay for tickets not to watch the coward assembly
@@pejuangbansos9468if you want entertainment go to the cinema. People buying tickets to support the team!
sorry i dont fully know the rule. but if a defender backpass to the keeper and its been intercept by opponent striker that was in an "offside" position, will it count as offside? say, if they put 1 guy just to mark the goalkeeper
The rule changed so you can’t pick up a back pass anymore. Also no offside only counts if the ball is played by your teammate
Those day you can't be offside as long you didn't get the ball from your teammate
Less than a minute were wasted with this rule, and yet people bitch and complain, now a days people just run to the corner flag and physically keep everyone away, wasting several minutes on throw ins, corner kicks, freekicks etc. How is that better?
It’s orders of magnitude better since the game is still in play in those situations and the other team can steal it. When the keeper handled the ball there was nothing anyone could do. The other team had 0% chance of recovering it.
Also: less than a minute? In an Ireland vs Egypt game in the 1990 WC the Irish keeper picked up a back pass and didn’t release it for SIX MINUTES! But sure, trying to guard the ball in play near the corner is exactly the same. Sure.
Wow you're probably too young to remember how much it was used and how much it spoiled the game...
Beckpass lah sebelum dilarang
As far as I remember there is 11 players on a soccer team including the goalie well done using all of them
This type of backpass currently it can be use
Can or can't? It can't be used (IFK is awarded to attackers)
関さんから来ましたよーっと
You smell like rice and shit !
FIFA could ban backpass using head too.
Head is not part of foot 🙄...
No
Oalah gara2 sibangsat ini
This is basic goal keeper training ...
Как же мне жаль немцев
rather excellent is a rather curious choice of wordws.
A heavily edited video.
Just like the offside rule. It was all legal.
What offside rule?
That why the back-pass rule had changed 😂
Yeah awful - Danes only knocked out France Holland and Germany scoring 6 goals along the way to winning the whole tournament - meanwhile England and France with all there talent score 3 goals between them and clear off home in the group stage 🤔
Isn't Back passes forbidden??!
Not at the time. The rule was only introduced about a month after this Euro final.
@Mathias Jaeger Tejsner Madsen he's not an idiot for not knowing exactly when the back pass rule was changed
Not in 1992.
@@fernandob.2960 It was forbidden in 1992 but after this match.
it was outlawed after this euros
As a Dane that celebrated this win in 92, I'm glad I was only 9 and didn't know how awful the match was 😅
But you know, thinking about it, it feels like the audience gets to participate in a way, letting their discontent heard and felt by the opposing team that what they're doing is contemptable and cowardly, so even if it seems like a good thing that they changed the rules, it'd probably make for better watercooler conversation the following days.
That game was in no way awful at all. THis here shows ONE minute of backpasses in a 90 minute high intensity game. It's likely posted by another clueless person with no knowledge about the game.
@@eidodkwell. True and not true. The time wasting was absolutely insane but the Danes scored two (one of them illegally) and Germany none. So fair play to them but that this was allowed is just funny to me now
@@Wolfgangsson None of them were illegal, though. There's no offside, there's no hands.
@@eidodk no idea if you are meaning that in an ironic way. I even forgot that both goals were illegally scored
@@Wolfgangsson And that's how you gave away that you're nothing but a troll.
Good lord, there’s a lot whiners in here - Every team did this, when they had a result to defend, for decades.
Thats how Denmark won the trophy so coward playing. The Statistics was that hey hold the ball like this for 26min. Player to Goaly, Goaly to hand. Goaly to player. Which was Smichael
Someone is salty lmao.
At least we have a Trophy, so keep crying.
@@formalist6096 A trophy without passing the group stages . And take a place of a team who disqualified and the way how you took it. Doest make a trophy which is deserved from a proud National team. That's how since then and now or in the future you will never have another one because that's was the only way and irony of destiny to have the only single "trophy" lmao. 😭 So keep dreaming for next 100 years for another cup.
@@formalist6096 And the Greece have one I'm half Greek . But at least we deserved it in every way we played. We gave the heart in field. If Greece would win this trophy like Denmark. I would never be so proud of count that one. Shame shame ..
@@alb4ever579 you’re Albanian lol. Your entire country is the definition of shame.
I didn’t know keepers used to be able to pick up back passes wtf
After this game this rule was introduced
@@amoghkt3568 But it was not because of this game! The back pass rule was introduced in 1992 to discourage time wasting and unduly defensive play after the 1990 World Cup.
I would tackle the shit out of the opponents. Red card would be a certainty, but at least I wouldn't allow to mock me like that. You like to play like that fine, go spend 3 months for a broken leg.
Easy to say.
Don't see why this is such big of a problem compared to the teams today. Germany would 100% have done the same if they were leading
No they wouldnt
.
They never did it before why would they now
I didnt like german football teams, almost always chear against...they always somehow won against Yugoslavian teams I did support. First WC I remember 1974, I loved to se Holland, and Germans somehow won over them. Makes me cry..
But one thing is sure- They play quite clear and fair football, they did not make this backpass dirty play.
No they wouldn't, and they didn't. This tactic wasn't widespread, and was considered very dirty. This Euro final basically cemented the need for a rule change.
@@octaviocgsalets say they did not use it as excessively as Denmark. It was used in the final 90 as well. But not even near as bad as here
can goalkeeper pik up the ball after his foot touch?
yes. allowed to pick up once
only when the ball was touched/passed by opponent. or touched by teammate(any part of the body except foot/foot-pass)
The back pass rule came into effect the following season to stop this & make the game more exciting.
So they wasted 1 minute of a 90 minute game? Boo hoo.
what a shame, what pathetic. I support Wales with all my heart in their next match.
🤪🤪🤪🇩🇰🇩🇰❤️
How did that workout for ya?
@@saim2434 Denmark=Back pass
Bro really got butthurt over something that was completely legal back in 1992 and takes it as reason to not support a country 29 years later lmao.
Chill... they won the game. This is how you play football if you want to be salty or not. Denmark were playing germany it was smart stop being toxic they did something incredible
Since new rules Denmark hasn’t won anything...
@@jojoduciel tbf we shouldn't win when you compare our players to the players of other european nations. so i highly doubt it has anything to do with the rule change, and more so to do with the fact that we are simply not good enough at football, and even in 92 we weren't supposed to have qualified, we got in on a technicality. BUT nonetheless what we accomplished is nothing short of extraordinary.
By right they weren’t even supposed to be in the 92 EuroCup ...
@@jojoducieland what has England won?
Exploit bug 🤣
Can't be that bad. I mean, this video is only around 1 mins long. If it was 90 minutes long then it will be something else.
It's CLEARLY that bad, if I saw it once id be emabrassed. This is the very personification of time wasting.
lol try watching any match of the 1990 World Cup and you will know how bad this behaviour was....
watch the match. It was hilarious
Lol
One minute of backpasses in a 90 minute game. The main difference between an NFL game and a football game is that it's 90 minutes of gametime vs 17 minutes of effective gametime in the NFL game.... Lookup the 2024 superbowl statistics, and see how much effective gametime there is in a 4 hour game night... It's 17 minutes... The rest is commercials and highlight clips.
Peter schmeichel would never do this...what is this.
this was before back-pass rule were applied.
This was the reason for backpass rule
@@graceyudha Not this specifically, the rule had passed through Fifa at this point and the Danish national team made a point of abusing the rule in its last ever game in place. But yes, if you meant the essence of what was happening in the video then that was the reason for the removal of the rule
Peter Schmeichel would never do something so dirty! Just like he would never do something so dirty as to play for Man City 👀
Germany should have man marked him. Denmark didn't even supposed to be on this euro. They went instead of Yugoslavia
But Denmark had a tactic
🧂🧂🧂🧂🧂🧂🧂🧂🧂🧂🧂🧂🧂🧂🧂
🤦🏼🤦🏼🤦🏼
That was really bad
Hahaha hahaha 🤣 celaka dulu punya bola
So, that was one entire minute? That must have decided the match. I know it wasn´t pretty but every team did it back then, if germany had been in front and they were the underdogs they would have done the same thing. And still, its one minute of the game, it didnt change much if anything
Main bocah
🤣
Who care ?? Its a tactic ..
A lousy tactic that made the games worse. Sure it was legal back then but it was abolished for a reason and the game is better for it.
Please, let's get some perspective here:
This video makes it look as if Denmark were doing this the entire match..!
For anyone (like myself) who has actually watched the match, you will know that was not the case! That's why the video only lasts 1:02min because that's the total time Denmark "wasted" out of 90min..! That makes it just over 1% of the entire match, which is nothing!!!
Yes they relied mainly on counter attacks, and yes they did waste a little time mainly at the end of the match when they were 2-0 up.
But let's not forget Denmark were massive underdogs, playing the current World Champions in their first ever major final!
Stop this nonsense and give Denmark the credit and respect they deserve for winning EURO92, playing some entertaining football as well along the way (watch semifinal vs Holland).
This video is a complete mis-representation of the match and Denmark's achievement as a whole, which is a shame.
Happy to address this:
1) The video doesn't make it "look as if Denmark were doing this the entire match". Most people realise that this sort of thing happened late in a game to keep the result safe.
2) 1 minute of a football match is not "nothing" at all! Plenty can happen inside a minute.
3) It's not nonsense, it doesn't make any judgement on Denmark or their achievement (which was exceptional, obviously)
4) It doesn't misrepresent anything! This was exactly the sort of (legal) timewasting that led to the Laws of the Game being changed in 1992.
No
Nothing? Mate the idea of doing that in the first place is fuckin stupid and wrong. End of story!
Agree.
@@AdamHurrey the title of the video is quite a stretch don’t you think? 😂
dumb way to win the game. this rule is same as golden goal rule where every single team tend to be so defensive and football become boring game.
😂😂😂😂
Disgusting