Youv'e spent half an hour telling us over and over again how great this engine can be and how much better it is over electric but no proof not even a running engine or details of how it works or how it is better.
Don’t you hate it, they carry on for 44 minutes for a 45 minute video and still nothing. Same with those Voyager 1 & 2 videos, everything it’s done from 1977 but nothing about “the alarming thing” it has found.
Look it up? Carbon dioxide is only .04% of the air we breathe. The air is gases, it contains 78% nitrogen, 21% oxygen, 1% argon, 0.04% carbon dioxide, and 0.5% water vapor. The nitrogen makes crops grow bigger and better.
Along with hydrogen, CO2 is needed also. As you stated, the atmosphere is 0.04% CO2….any lower and plants start to die. The earth needs to INCREASE CO2! Not lower it!!
CO2 is a gas that intercepts heat radiation from the earth going to space. That heat loss is what allows Earth to not be like Venus, where lead melts on the surface. It doesn't take much CO2 to do that. If green fuel is manufactured by using CO2 free energy to turn atmospheric CO2 into fuel, then fuel artificial fuel could be used. But that heaps one inefficiency onto the already low efficiency of any heat engine.
@@tomft3992 absolute truth . we are in a carbon drought. though at this rate of change....if permafrost begins to melt the methane incursion will be fatal for people..... we are in a goldilocks zone for life as we know it regardless ... only constant is change ask a teradactyl... or 3 foot wingspan dragonfly.
@@tomft3992CO2 is plant food. ..Learn it; ….Live it; ……Release it! With that said, I still much prefer the driving characteristics of my EV than that of ICE cars and the noise, thrashing of parts and transmissions of them. I can’t even imaging the price of a Koenigsegg engine.
The main reason why electrical vehicles are at the forefront of innovation is that it takes the independence from the public and gives it to governments with technical control. However, the free-valve system hands the independence back to the consumer while diversifying fuels and dramatically reduces emissions. This radical change diametrically goes against the new order that's on the horizon. Bravo Koenigsegg, bravo!
Control from governments isn't going to benifit the consumer, battery disposal and production is my concern with electric, plus demand from an already stretched power grid, this idea is should scare companies away from ev rollout, theyre already lying to the public how good ev's are.
These people are the blame along with us for driving such garbage and not knowing that you were a polluting all those years and didn't know that's what you were doing. ignorent is no excuse.were all guilty.
Except for the fact that Freevalve technology is only available on Keonigsegg's vehicles, made only for the "Lifestyles of the Rich and Shameless" folks, for absurd amounts of money. So as of this time, even if this engine existed right now (it does not...heard the 'if' at 8:25?), if would affect perhaps 0.0000000001% of automobiles, and make virtually zero difference in the scope of our planet. It would have zero effect on EVs either, because though EVs themselves are elitist items to begin with, Keonigsegg automobiles are a million times more so...mostly because they have cars that actually sell for over a million dollars. Second, are we going to pretend that Keonigsegg cares in the slightest about emissions, efficiency, or the environment, or doing something wonderful for mankind? No one can be that foolish. He's here for the almighty dollar and nothing more. LOL!
Thats the truth to less than the 10% in the world Rest of the world isn't monopolized by government when it comes to EV Infact in Afro Asia, eclectic cars means free trips because power isnt totally in Gov or corporate control Offgrid power installation is just an iPhone or couple of...needed to run a home and power your car...EV or PHEV So having to by fuel imakes nk sense if you've Solar/ wind is Afro Asia ev in remote rural areas where mining and Agri business is...this includes future Safari industries Why you wanna pay for whats free to monopoly? 😁
I agree. 3 minutes into the video and no mention I heard of what fuel the engine uses. Should have lead with that. If it’s hydrogen, then it’s interesting. If it’s fossil fuel driven, then it doesn’t matter how efficient it is.
so if that is a 32 valve V8 type of related valvetrain that uses electric solenoids, at 1000rpm on a 12 volt system it would be operating at a static 55amp load on the battery/charging system... and that doubles for every 1000rpm linearly, so 2k would be 110amp as so 8000rpm would be 440amp just to operate 32 of the 90 gram engine valves. that's up to 7kw, a standard camshaft engine has balanced spring loading/unloading so their is no added resistance to rotation... even if their was a hybrid electric regen system on the axles, normal traffic driving would not keep the normal 12v battery operating without a 500amp alternator. that's 12hp more energy consumption to run the electric valves where as a standard camshaft engine has balances valve spring compression/decompression loading over the camshaft. if they put a 1100cca battery in one of those it would run for 3 minuets without the alternator/regenerative braking. driving an electric car that plugs into a fossil fuel power grid is as efficient as driving a 7 ton truck. ... those things only perceivably make more power/efficacy over a isolated aria of run time on a track that is mostly down hill, not exceeding a few short minuets.
The energy required to manufacture a battery-powered car, particularly its **battery pack**, is substantial and often overlooked in the "hype" surrounding electric vehicles (EVs). Here's a detailed breakdown of the hidden energy and environmental costs: --- ### **1. Energy for Mining and Processing Raw Materials** - **Lithium, Cobalt, Nickel, and Graphite** are essential components of EV batteries. Extracting and refining these materials consumes significant energy: - Mining operations involve diesel-powered machinery, contributing to carbon emissions. - Processing raw materials (e.g., refining lithium into lithium carbonate or hydroxide) requires high-temperature processes powered by electricity or fossil fuels. - **Example**: Producing 1 kg of lithium can emit **15 kg of CO₂**. A typical EV battery requires 8-12 kg of lithium, along with other materials. --- ### **2. Manufacturing the Battery Pack** - Battery production is energy-intensive, especially in the **cathode and anode manufacturing** stages. Factories require large amounts of electricity, often sourced from fossil fuels in regions with non-renewable grids. - **Energy Use**: Producing a 60 kWh battery (like that of a Tesla Model 3) emits **6-15 metric tons of CO₂**, depending on energy sources and technology used. --- ### **3. Supply Chain and Transportation** - Materials often travel across continents during production: - Raw materials mined in South America, Africa, or Australia. - Refined in China or Europe. - Batteries assembled in factories located elsewhere. - This global supply chain adds to the energy footprint due to shipping and logistics. --- ### **4. Car Manufacturing Beyond the Battery** - While the battery is the largest contributor, building the rest of the car (body, electronics, tires) also consumes energy similar to conventional vehicles. - However, EVs often use lightweight materials like aluminum, which requires more energy to produce than steel. --- ### **5. End-of-Life Recycling** - Recycling EV batteries is challenging and energy-intensive: - Current processes (pyrolysis, hydrometallurgy) require high temperatures and significant energy inputs. - Recycling rates for some materials, like lithium, are still low. --- ### **6. Energy Debt vs. Operational Efficiency** - **Energy Payback Period**: Despite high initial energy costs, EVs typically offset these emissions during their lifetime due to higher energy efficiency and zero tailpipe emissions. - An EV can repay its "energy debt" in **1-2 years** of driving if powered by renewable energy. - For fossil-fueled grids, it may take longer (up to 4-5 years). --- ### **Hidden Factors Not Accounted for in Hype** 1. **Carbon Intensity of Electricity**: Manufacturing and charging an EV in areas relying on coal-heavy grids increases overall emissions. 2. **Rare Earth Dependency**: Mining for materials like neodymium for EV motors also has environmental costs. 3. **Battery Size**: Larger batteries (e.g., in long-range EVs) increase the energy and environmental costs disproportionately. 4. **Battery Degradation**: Replacing or refurbishing batteries after 8-10 years adds to the lifecycle energy cost. --- ### **Key Numbers: Energy and CO₂ for a 60 kWh EV** - Battery production: **6-15 tons of CO₂**. - Total manufacturing (including the car): **8-20 tons of CO₂**. - Energy savings during use: **50%-70% lower CO₂ emissions per km compared to ICE vehicles**, depending on electricity source. --- EVs are a step toward sustainability, but their true environmental cost depends heavily on improving battery technologies, recycling efficiency, and cleaner energy grids. Without these, some of the hype can be misleading.
It's called LFG, Little Friendly Giant, not Light Speed Engine. They call the transmission LST, Light Speed Transmission. The LFG is a 2L 3cyl 600hp and 600Nm engine with free valve. Btw, it was quite a few years ago.
This engine has been out for years. It's an online four that as an NA puts out 300hp. Turbo charge it and it has the capability of 600+. This was a joint venture with the now gone Saab 2.0 eco power.
30 minutes of video and 30 seconds of information. This is a textbook example of how one might take 20-30 10 second video clips, mostly of stock footage of robots, gadgets or clips from Koenigsegg website and randomly disperse them over and over again for 30 minutes. After watching I went away understanding how Alex from Clockwork Orange must have felt after he was forced to watch hours of crap with his eyes wired open. Long waste of time videos like this make me not only NOT subscribe but make me quickly press the "don't show me this channel" button.
This new engine is a challenge to all manufacturers to embrace this new engine as a quick exchange from current diesel and petrol without too much change within engine housings in current car models
That’s why they do this just to get attention. The people that make these videos just want click bait so they can get advertisements on their videos and they get paid for it.
Gas combustion is here to stay! Porsche is another manufacturer who's new engine design will get rid of EVs for good as well. The future is still ICE and hybrids not EVs
How many ways can you say the same thing over and over and over playing the same video clips? This video could have been 5 to 10 minute long and said all it needed to say.
Before you can argue with EV nuts about being clean, as they erroneously think that their cars don't pollute at all, but refuse to recognize and realize how much and how many 'dirty' combustion engines it takes to get the lithium out of the earth and process it to where they can make vehicle batteries out of it. If your car has any emissions at all coming out of it's tail pipe, it won't satisfy them, and I tell you right now the only fuel you could use in it to make them shut up is hydrogen, which puts out pure water from the tail pipe. You can do it the wrong way and compress it and put it in tanks, or you could do what an inventor back in the 90's did with his experimental car and make hydrogen on board, as it is a simple process. He did it and made a coast to coast trip the took around 22 gallons of water to do it, but sadly was murdered before he could advance his car to the manufacturers to build them, of which are probably the ones to do away with him. Whatever, but this country will never see all cars being EV's on the roads taking over all ICE vehicles as you can't get the public to buy them, and that is being proven every day. They won't buy ICE cars either right now until they can build one that won't fall apart on you, and until they bring down prices to a reasonable level, and I wonder when this problem will be addressed and solved, which better be soon.
Sounds like a good idea.. but, it seems like electric actuated valves..? That's going to be an acheles heel .. because usual the valves are mechanically operated. But, still sounds like maybe a good idea
In 1952 we had hydrogen race car on a track go over 150 miles per hour, and an electric car go 1,200 miles on a regular car battery. In my opinion we are highly regulated on this planet that are exploited for money.
Although the free valve concept is intriguing, no matter how you slice it the electric car will always be cleaned running, however the pollution that comes with refining the rare earth elements to produce the batteries kills the edge it had. The longevity of the electric motor is without question going to die long before the free valve engine. Also the charging infrastructure to make sure people can actually travel with electric cars will have to be only as far apart as the shortest distance that the least efficient e-car can travel on a single charge where a fuel driven car will travel much farther. Not to mention all the fuel and pollution created to bring the charging station to its location and the power to charge is almost as bad as today's combustion engine. Now the real issue I would have is say your going across the country on a two week vacation from California to Georgia and it's towards the end of winter and you hit a freak snowstorm and although your safe you end up stuck behind a 70 car and truck pile up. Your e-car is at 62% capacity and it's still snowing it could be 8 to 10 hours before your able to continue and about 5 or 6 hours into waiting your battery has fallen to a dangerous level like 15%. Your no longer going to be able to stay warm and in another 4 hours your going to freeze to death on the freeway. Not good.
is it possible running a vehicle using the energy by the wind ? any other thing that could create an energy by using wind ? may be running it with compact generator into a vehicle ? so the only thing can produce the wind by its own without need to charge it . just currious .
back when we had horse n cart , they said fueling them at gas stations would never work , now we got gas stations , we cant see that they will be future charging stations . fun fact , before Toyota released Lexus , Toyota did a US survey to find out what people wanted ... has GM or Ford ever given a damn what the market wants ????
I think an electronic vehicle with a hydrogen generator to keep the battery topped up as you drive would be even more efficient plus you could park the vehicle and have it charged everywhere of the hydrogen generator with out plugging in anywhere. Could the light speed engine work on hydrogen
The biggest question is what's the Unit Price? As we all know this company is selling luxury sports car. I don't think they could produce cheap but reliable Japanese and much more Chinese Automotive Brands.
Electric vehicles have pros and cons .Don't feel easy to have big batteries under my seat.When EV catch fire it is not easy to put out.I still prefer Fuel driven engine.But if someone can develope a fuel efficient engine, environmentally friendly engine I am all for it!!Cars on the road are not suppose to run like sports car.If vehicles can run on fuels such as recycled cooking oil, methanol, ethanol, all the better.
Any advances in electronics dealing with automobile's will allow the government to gain excessive control over the people who are using them. They can track your movements and even kill the engine, leaving them the option of forcing the people to do what they are told to by the government or they could leave the person stranded somewhere that might be dangerous. Or cost them their job. But irrelevant of anything else i see nothing but trouble with the electrical systems put in cars beyond what is nessary for safe driving like lights, turn signals and a basic radio.
The only way an engine this complex will change the industry is if it can be made cheaply enough for use in ordinary Toyota's and Chevy's . I think not .
Electric cars are not green or are the methods of making green energy. Wind, and solar create vast amounts of waste not to mention the oceans of batteries that will have to be disposed of. Both our Acura and Toyota are exceptionally clean burning and reliable. They can be fully refueled in less than five minutes!
Ther is already a system filter that can retro fitted to any and all engines that takes all carbon and other heavy elements out the need for something new is wasting time and money the problem is oil owners don't want it don't care about clean air
I would never buy a vehicle so close to the floor that at the first bump my fenders would fly off. In times like today when rain can get to my belly button that car would be destroyed.
Sounds promising. They could use carbon fiber optics with solar technology and we could get a car it's no need for fuel. Hydrogen would work too. The problem isn't possibility. It's profits.
Our weekly installment of "EVs are Finished"without a shred of concrete evidence. It might be possible to make an ICE engine with a higher power to weight ratio than an electric motor, but it will not be as efficient because there will be many more moving parts and they will all have higher native emissions. Now that battery technology is evolving more quickly with the use of materials less likely to fail, complex reciprocating ICE engines will not last as long as an electric motor without regular servicing and the use of decomposing lubricants.
Funny how the BATTERY BRIGADE will have a dig at people trying to invent new greener ways to power a vehicle , while driving around in technology introduced in the 1830s. Funny if it wasnt so....... nah just funny.😢
The story surfaced months ago and yet not even a prototype vehicle was seen tested on the road . Maybe there was but result was disastrous . So now , maybe it’s back to the drawing board ….. Check with China , it might already have a better one on standby .
Brzi tehnološki razvoj EV ih čini bezvrednim posle 3-4 godine. Klipni ekološki motori trebaju da postoje jer nisu svi ljudi na planeti u mogućnosti da napune EV u garaži ili ispred zgrade . Pad prodaje EV objašnjava sve .
Youv'e spent half an hour telling us over and over again how great this engine can be and how much better it is over electric but no proof not even a running engine or details of how it works or how it is better.
Don’t you hate it, they carry on for 44 minutes for a 45 minute video and still nothing.
Same with those Voyager 1 & 2 videos, everything it’s done from 1977 but nothing about
“the alarming thing”
it has found.
Is it the freevalve?
And it's still gas😂
To complicate, never work for the simple future ahead, why don't you do something simple?
Just bla bla over and over again!!
It’s so sad that he wasn’t allowed to take over SAAB 😕
Da . . 😢😢😢
After listening to this sales pitch I can see why.
Many have claimed this sort of revolutionary engines but none have prevailed yet.
Koenigsegg has done it! Same with Porsche's new engine design! EVs are done and on their way out!!!
And i love it, i hate EVs. @@raulsanchezjr4048
Koenigsegg has some pretty wild tech packed into a small lightweight package. They’ve designed/engineered alot.
You're not a real engine fan unless you marry it.
One reason. OPEC.
Look it up? Carbon dioxide is only .04% of the air we breathe. The air is gases, it contains 78% nitrogen, 21% oxygen, 1% argon, 0.04% carbon dioxide, and 0.5% water vapor. The nitrogen makes crops grow bigger and better.
Along with hydrogen, CO2 is needed also. As you stated, the atmosphere is 0.04% CO2….any lower and plants start to die. The earth needs to INCREASE CO2! Not lower it!!
CO2 is a gas that intercepts heat radiation from the earth going to space. That heat loss is what allows Earth to not be like Venus, where lead melts on the surface. It doesn't take much CO2 to do that. If green fuel is manufactured by using CO2 free energy to turn atmospheric CO2 into fuel, then fuel artificial fuel could be used. But that heaps one inefficiency onto the already low efficiency of any heat engine.
@tomft3992 also we were told as kids that co2 was a lot higher millions of years ago and that's why trees and plants were A LOT bigger. 😅
@@tomft3992 absolute truth . we are in a carbon drought. though at this rate of change....if permafrost begins to melt the methane incursion will be fatal for people..... we are in a goldilocks zone for life as we know it regardless ... only constant is change ask a teradactyl... or 3 foot wingspan dragonfly.
@@tomft3992CO2 is plant food.
..Learn it;
….Live it;
……Release it!
With that said, I still much prefer the driving characteristics of my EV than that of ICE cars and the noise, thrashing of parts and transmissions of them. I can’t even imaging the price of a Koenigsegg engine.
Usual click bait BS
Actually this one is true and already here! EVs will be gone soon! The way to go is this and hybrid for power gains and economy
@@raulsanchezjr4048hydrogen fuel cell technology had the same promise decades ago but stalled & went nowhere
Click bait for the closed minded. Not for surface thinkers...
Another 30 minutes of pure BS.
Owe 😢
with what this guy has accomplished over the years I'll give him a break and see what happens
He is truly a genius, he has solved problems that many did not even know existed.
Koenigsegg are world leaders in building very serious electric propulsion systems😂😂😂...He loves propulsion to the max...he won't knock anything 😉 😀..
Thank you very much for letting me know. I’ve only just wasted one minute 15 second of my time.
The main reason why electrical vehicles are at the forefront of innovation is that it takes the independence from the public and gives it to governments with technical control. However, the free-valve system hands the independence back to the consumer while diversifying fuels and dramatically reduces emissions. This radical change diametrically goes against the new order that's on the horizon. Bravo Koenigsegg, bravo!
Control from governments isn't going to benifit the consumer, battery disposal and production is my concern with electric, plus demand from an already stretched power grid, this idea is should scare companies away from ev rollout, theyre already lying to the public how good ev's are.
Exactly ✅@@v1ccf
These people are the blame along with us for driving such garbage and not knowing that you were a polluting all those years and didn't know that's what you were doing. ignorent is no excuse.were all guilty.
Except for the fact that Freevalve technology is only available on Keonigsegg's vehicles, made only for the "Lifestyles of the Rich and Shameless" folks, for absurd amounts of money. So as of this time, even if this engine existed right now (it does not...heard the 'if' at 8:25?), if would affect perhaps 0.0000000001% of automobiles, and make virtually zero difference in the scope of our planet. It would have zero effect on EVs either, because though EVs themselves are elitist items to begin with, Keonigsegg automobiles are a million times more so...mostly because they have cars that actually sell for over a million dollars. Second, are we going to pretend that Keonigsegg cares in the slightest about emissions, efficiency, or the environment, or doing something wonderful for mankind? No one can be that foolish. He's here for the almighty dollar and nothing more. LOL!
Thats the truth to less than the 10% in the world
Rest of the world isn't monopolized by government when it comes to EV
Infact in Afro Asia, eclectic cars means free trips because power isnt totally in Gov or corporate control
Offgrid power installation is just an iPhone or couple of...needed to run a home and power your car...EV or PHEV
So having to by fuel imakes nk sense if you've Solar/ wind is Afro Asia ev in remote rural areas where mining and Agri business is...this includes future Safari industries
Why you wanna pay for whats free to monopoly? 😁
Too much blabla
I agree. 3 minutes into the video and no mention I heard of what fuel the engine uses. Should have lead with that. If it’s hydrogen, then it’s interesting. If it’s fossil fuel driven, then it doesn’t matter how efficient it is.
so if that is a 32 valve V8 type of related valvetrain that uses electric solenoids, at 1000rpm on a 12 volt system it would be operating at a static 55amp load on the battery/charging system... and that doubles for every 1000rpm linearly, so 2k would be 110amp as so 8000rpm would be 440amp just to operate 32 of the 90 gram engine valves. that's up to 7kw, a standard camshaft engine has balanced spring loading/unloading so their is no added resistance to rotation... even if their was a hybrid electric regen system on the axles, normal traffic driving would not keep the normal 12v battery operating without a 500amp alternator. that's 12hp more energy consumption to run the electric valves where as a standard camshaft engine has balances valve spring compression/decompression loading over the camshaft. if they put a 1100cca battery in one of those it would run for 3 minuets without the alternator/regenerative braking. driving an electric car that plugs into a fossil fuel power grid is as efficient as driving a 7 ton truck. ... those things only perceivably make more power/efficacy over a isolated aria of run time on a track that is mostly down hill, not exceeding a few short minuets.
Wow😂
You are hired!
@Perry-o9b the man
The energy required to manufacture a battery-powered car, particularly its **battery pack**, is substantial and often overlooked in the "hype" surrounding electric vehicles (EVs). Here's a detailed breakdown of the hidden energy and environmental costs:
---
### **1. Energy for Mining and Processing Raw Materials**
- **Lithium, Cobalt, Nickel, and Graphite** are essential components of EV batteries. Extracting and refining these materials consumes significant energy:
- Mining operations involve diesel-powered machinery, contributing to carbon emissions.
- Processing raw materials (e.g., refining lithium into lithium carbonate or hydroxide) requires high-temperature processes powered by electricity or fossil fuels.
- **Example**: Producing 1 kg of lithium can emit **15 kg of CO₂**. A typical EV battery requires 8-12 kg of lithium, along with other materials.
---
### **2. Manufacturing the Battery Pack**
- Battery production is energy-intensive, especially in the **cathode and anode manufacturing** stages. Factories require large amounts of electricity, often sourced from fossil fuels in regions with non-renewable grids.
- **Energy Use**: Producing a 60 kWh battery (like that of a Tesla Model 3) emits **6-15 metric tons of CO₂**, depending on energy sources and technology used.
---
### **3. Supply Chain and Transportation**
- Materials often travel across continents during production:
- Raw materials mined in South America, Africa, or Australia.
- Refined in China or Europe.
- Batteries assembled in factories located elsewhere.
- This global supply chain adds to the energy footprint due to shipping and logistics.
---
### **4. Car Manufacturing Beyond the Battery**
- While the battery is the largest contributor, building the rest of the car (body, electronics, tires) also consumes energy similar to conventional vehicles.
- However, EVs often use lightweight materials like aluminum, which requires more energy to produce than steel.
---
### **5. End-of-Life Recycling**
- Recycling EV batteries is challenging and energy-intensive:
- Current processes (pyrolysis, hydrometallurgy) require high temperatures and significant energy inputs.
- Recycling rates for some materials, like lithium, are still low.
---
### **6. Energy Debt vs. Operational Efficiency**
- **Energy Payback Period**: Despite high initial energy costs, EVs typically offset these emissions during their lifetime due to higher energy efficiency and zero tailpipe emissions.
- An EV can repay its "energy debt" in **1-2 years** of driving if powered by renewable energy.
- For fossil-fueled grids, it may take longer (up to 4-5 years).
---
### **Hidden Factors Not Accounted for in Hype**
1. **Carbon Intensity of Electricity**: Manufacturing and charging an EV in areas relying on coal-heavy grids increases overall emissions.
2. **Rare Earth Dependency**: Mining for materials like neodymium for EV motors also has environmental costs.
3. **Battery Size**: Larger batteries (e.g., in long-range EVs) increase the energy and environmental costs disproportionately.
4. **Battery Degradation**: Replacing or refurbishing batteries after 8-10 years adds to the lifecycle energy cost.
---
### **Key Numbers: Energy and CO₂ for a 60 kWh EV**
- Battery production: **6-15 tons of CO₂**.
- Total manufacturing (including the car): **8-20 tons of CO₂**.
- Energy savings during use: **50%-70% lower CO₂ emissions per km compared to ICE vehicles**, depending on electricity source.
---
EVs are a step toward sustainability, but their true environmental cost depends heavily on improving battery technologies, recycling efficiency, and cleaner energy grids. Without these, some of the hype can be misleading.
Now that’s what I really like Pure logic , facts , and proof . Supports my Doctorate in BSD essential to acquire ie Bull Shit Detection .
Just more click bait
Thanks for saving my time I quickly realized this video was bogus lol 😂 so I came to the comment section.
@@Sickoloko24...until you want to buy one!
It's called LFG, Little Friendly Giant, not Light Speed Engine. They call the transmission LST, Light Speed Transmission. The LFG is a 2L 3cyl 600hp and 600Nm engine with free valve. Btw, it was quite a few years ago.
This engine has been out for years. It's an online four that as an NA puts out 300hp. Turbo charge it and it has the capability of 600+. This was a joint venture with the now gone Saab 2.0 eco power.
One thing what electric vehicles companies don't tell you is how expensive it's gonna be to fix an electric vehicle when it's broken.
30 minutes of video and 30 seconds of information. This is a textbook example of how one might take 20-30 10 second video clips, mostly of stock footage of robots, gadgets or clips from Koenigsegg website and randomly disperse them over and over again for 30 minutes. After watching I went away understanding how Alex from Clockwork Orange must have felt after he was forced to watch hours of crap with his eyes wired open. Long waste of time videos like this make me not only NOT subscribe but make me quickly press the "don't show me this channel" button.
You don't remember that every inventor comes up missing and the invitation goes away
This new engine is a challenge to all manufacturers to embrace this new engine as a quick exchange from current diesel and petrol without too much change within engine housings in current car models
You didn’t tell us anything actually
You just didn't pay attention but he did
@raulsanchezjr4048 Yeah all I heard was "has the potential".
That’s why they do this just to get attention. The people that make these videos just want click bait so they can get advertisements on their videos and they get paid for it.
DONT BELIEVE IT, ITS ALL BS😢😮😅
The bad part is the timing chain and the aluminum block and heads nothing like a dodge he'll cat engine or the V10 viper engine
Has anyone ever counted the number of parts (that could fail) in this ICE engine.
The title had me think of an electromagnetic engine or something not another gas engine
Gas combustion is here to stay! Porsche is another manufacturer who's new engine design will get rid of EVs for good as well. The future is still ICE and hybrids not EVs
I thought of a camless engine 20 years ago
How many ways can you say the same thing over and over and over playing the same video clips? This video could have been 5 to 10 minute long and said all it needed to say.
God bless you Christian koenigsegg
Before you can argue with EV nuts about being clean, as they erroneously think that their cars don't pollute at all, but refuse to recognize and realize how much and how many 'dirty' combustion engines it takes to get the lithium out of the earth and process it to where they can make vehicle batteries out of it. If your car has any emissions at all coming out of it's tail pipe, it won't satisfy them, and I tell you right now the only fuel you could use in it to make them shut up is hydrogen, which puts out pure water from the tail pipe. You can do it the wrong way and compress it and put it in tanks, or you could do what an inventor back in the 90's did with his experimental car and make hydrogen on board, as it is a simple process. He did it and made a coast to coast trip the took around 22 gallons of water to do it, but sadly was murdered before he could advance his car to the manufacturers to build them, of which are probably the ones to do away with him. Whatever, but this country will never see all cars being EV's on the roads taking over all ICE vehicles as you can't get the public to buy them, and that is being proven every day. They won't buy ICE cars either right now until they can build one that won't fall apart on you, and until they bring down prices to a reasonable level, and I wonder when this problem will be addressed and solved, which better be soon.
Let me know when one of this engine on a Civic base model
Christian is a great person for an automotive industry and development!!!!
Even if we go totally hybrid I'm for that as long as we can still service vehicles ourselves
Sounds like a good idea.. but, it seems like electric actuated valves..? That's going to be an acheles heel .. because usual the valves are mechanically operated.
But, still sounds like maybe a good idea
In 1952 we had hydrogen race car on a track go over 150 miles per hour, and an electric car go 1,200 miles on a regular car battery. In my opinion we are highly regulated on this planet that are exploited for money.
Scale ?
EV’s - there is still no recycling option for the li-ion batteries
Although the free valve concept is intriguing, no matter how you slice it the electric car will always be cleaned running, however the pollution that comes with refining the rare earth elements to produce the batteries kills the edge it had. The longevity of the electric motor is without question going to die long before the free valve engine. Also the charging infrastructure to make sure people can actually travel with electric cars will have to be only as far apart as the shortest distance that the least efficient e-car can travel on a single charge where a fuel driven car will travel much farther. Not to mention all the fuel and pollution created to bring the charging station to its location and the power to charge is almost as bad as today's combustion engine. Now the real issue I would have is say your going across the country on a two week vacation from California to Georgia and it's towards the end of winter and you hit a freak snowstorm and although your safe you end up stuck behind a 70 car and truck pile up. Your e-car is at 62% capacity and it's still snowing it could be 8 to 10 hours before your able to continue and about 5 or 6 hours into waiting your battery has fallen to a dangerous level like 15%. Your no longer going to be able to stay warm and in another 4 hours your going to freeze to death on the freeway. Not good.
is it possible running a vehicle using the energy by the wind ? any other thing that could create an energy by using wind ? may be running it with compact generator into a vehicle ? so the only thing can produce the wind by its own without need to charge it . just currious .
back when we had horse n cart , they said fueling them at gas stations would never work , now we got gas stations , we cant see that they will be future charging stations .
fun fact , before Toyota released Lexus , Toyota did a US survey to find out what people wanted ... has GM or Ford ever given a damn what the market wants ????
It is better but those electr. Valves gets clogged and faulty wery fast
I think an electronic vehicle with a hydrogen generator to keep the battery topped up as you drive would be even more efficient plus you could park the vehicle and have it charged everywhere of the hydrogen generator with out plugging in anywhere.
Could the light speed engine work on hydrogen
A subcompact koenigsegg wits 600 hp 2.0 liter 3 cylinder would dominate the market. Not even honda could compete.
It’s a half hour COMMERCIAL
interesting, i thought the freevalve project was scrapped... It sounds very promising to be honest... Let's see how it goes...
demo on the engine?????? where is it???????
I this as amazing ti get ride of valve but we have heard about it for so long and nothing has come to market
ELECTRIC CARS ARE A WAST OF TIME. I WILL NEVER BYE ONE .
You will buy one, just like people stopped buying a horse and cart. EVs are better and will be cheaper in all ways.
@@Mr_Foresightbuy a ton of dead weight and continue your day dreaming.... 😅😅😅
Had one for 4 years and loving it. So funny for how it pisses all over the old technology at traffic lights
The man is right is all I can say. Being raised my brother and I as mechanics/machines
This man speaks the truth.
At the end of the day. It is still an Internal Combustion Engine with adaptations.
Actuation valves but still shows cams, huh
The biggest question is what's the Unit Price? As we all know this company is selling luxury sports car. I don't think they could produce cheap but reliable Japanese and much more Chinese Automotive Brands.
Brilliant Design,Hardly any friction in that set up
I don"t think so, cost, maintnance challenges?
How secretive and announced?
Some believe everything they hear. Oil is constantly being made in the earth lol. It’s been proven. If this engine is this good it sounds awesome 🙌🏽
I think the 2-stroke engine has been around for a long time, no valve hihi
The elétrics are killing themselfs.
Freevalve....innovation......Fiat in 2010 = hold my beer
This should have been given to the woeld 25 years ago
If, future, vision, benefits, maybe, challenges.
Says it all
Outperform? No, but a compliment.
Electric vehicles have pros and cons .Don't feel easy to have big batteries under my seat.When EV catch fire it is not easy to put out.I still prefer
Fuel driven engine.But if someone can develope a fuel efficient engine, environmentally friendly engine I am all for it!!Cars on the road are not suppose to run like sports car.If vehicles can run on fuels such as recycled cooking oil, methanol, ethanol, all the better.
Any advances in electronics dealing with automobile's will allow the government to gain excessive control over the people who are using them. They can track your movements and even kill the engine, leaving them the option of forcing the people to do what they are told to by the government or they could leave the person stranded somewhere that might be dangerous. Or cost them their job. But irrelevant of anything else i see nothing but trouble with the electrical systems put in cars beyond what is nessary for safe driving like lights, turn signals and a basic radio.
Theres already engines that no ev has matched.
Maintenance is v v high for this new ICE
All current engines run on biobutanol, but the government is not permitting it.
The only way an engine this complex will change the industry is if it can be made cheaply enough for use in ordinary Toyota's and Chevy's . I think not .
Magnetic engine is only real game changer.
Thermal efficiency is the holdup. More than 50% still goes to heat.
Only 30% so it's cooler too
@raulsanchezjr4048 huh?
Where is the prototype If there is one Talk is cheap
DO IT!
Numatic controlled engine find this hard to believe. The second it gets dirty air it all over with.
Its great as we all become more and more dependent on electricity
Electric cars are not green or are the methods of making green energy. Wind, and solar create vast amounts of waste not to mention the oceans of batteries that will have to be disposed of. Both our Acura and Toyota are exceptionally clean burning and reliable. They can be fully refueled in less than five minutes!
The WEF wont allow IC engines...
battery's aren't renewable energy don't know why everyone says that Bs an most drive by hearing
Ther is already a system filter that can retro fitted to any and all engines that takes all carbon and other heavy elements out the need for something new is wasting time and money the problem is oil owners don't want it don't care about clean air
Would have been better if you had actually told us something
I would like to see this engine with a large HHO generator , using calcium carbonate for the electrolyte .
I would never buy a vehicle so close to the floor that at the first bump my fenders would fly off. In times like today when rain can get to my belly button that car would be destroyed.
If the CEO says it is revolutionary, who are we to question?
Sounds promising. They could use carbon fiber optics with solar technology and we could get a car it's no need for fuel. Hydrogen would work too. The problem isn't possibility. It's profits.
If engines are dying and motors are rising then why pushing on engines
I bet the oil companies are happy
We can all drive a Koenigsegg 😁
The “concern” over carbon in environmental concerns will be less important in the future, so will laws.
If it is an internal combustion engine is just more of the same
Christian ROCKS !! Thank GOD for this petrolhead. Bring on Non-electric 2.0
I’m in favor of this new engine 😊
Our weekly installment of "EVs are Finished"without a shred of concrete evidence.
It might be possible to make an ICE engine with a higher power to weight ratio than an electric motor, but it will not be as efficient because there will be many more moving parts and they will all have higher native emissions.
Now that battery technology is evolving more quickly with the use of materials less likely to fail, complex reciprocating ICE engines will not last as long as an electric motor without regular servicing and the use of decomposing lubricants.
Please do it This idea is trillions times better than ev's
Excellent
Funny how the BATTERY BRIGADE will have a dig at people trying to invent new greener ways to power a vehicle , while driving around in technology introduced in the 1830s. Funny if it wasnt so....... nah just funny.😢
What a waste of time for not saying what is the MPG.
As always, no facts but only BS blablabla
I think there is something in this ICE engine design continue forward I say.!
Instead of all the flowery gratuities, how about some actual performance figures ?
I još nešto : jeftini kineski EV se nikad neće pojaviti u EU i USA u nekom većem broju . Nikad .
Can it be as silent as an electric car?
what a clearly scripted bias video...totally believable
how cost cars
Another engine that will revolutionize the automotive industry, yaw in a long line of engines that never materialize.
The story surfaced months ago and yet not even a prototype vehicle was seen tested on the road . Maybe there was but result was disastrous . So now , maybe it’s back to the drawing board ….. Check with China , it might already have a better one on standby .
Brzi tehnološki razvoj EV ih čini bezvrednim posle 3-4 godine. Klipni ekološki motori trebaju da postoje jer nisu svi ljudi na planeti u mogućnosti da napune EV u garaži ili ispred zgrade . Pad prodaje EV objašnjava sve .
Still “THEY” will demand if is not THEIR accepted type and uses THAT “petrol” or others with “THEIR” despised exhaust emissions !!