The development of battleship project A-140 involved the study of more than 20 different layouts, with different top speeds, operational ranges (fuel capacity), cruising speeds, either full diesel or full steam propulsion (and also combined steam and diesel propulsion concepts). In terms of armament, the use of 12,7 cm twin mounts and 15,5 cm three-gun turrets was assumed by default, but the number of twin 12,7 cm mounts and 15,5 cm turrets varied, as well as their placement. Naturally, these variations in the placement of secondary and tertiary armament was determined by constraints above deck due to the placement of the primary armament and superstructure, and below deck by the arrangement of the gunppwder storage for the primary armament on the one hand, and by the arrangement of boiler rooms and machinery spaces in other cases (that is, the steam turbines of the shafts for primary propulsion (of which most proposals had four, I beloeve) cannot coexist with the foundation and ammunition storage of a 15,5 cm three-gun turret, so wherever there is a turbine room, a turret cannot be placed directly above it, and the placement of the 15,5 cm turrets goes on to determine the possible arrangements of the tertiary (12,7 cm) armament, etc. As for the primary armament, it was not only the final "special type" 41 cm gun that was considered, but also a longer version of the same (for increased muzzle velocity, but ultimately considered too expensive and too heavy), as well as improved versions of the normal 41 cm gun. Arrangements varied between three three-gun turrets carrying the modernized 41 cm guns, for a total of 9, or four such turrets with the same gun, for a total of 12, and in the case of the "special type" 41 cm, there were proposals for either one two-gun turret and two three-gun turrets for 8 guns in total, or three three-gun turrets for nine guns total, or two two-gun turrets and two three-gun turrets for a total of 10 guns. And don't ask about the number, arrangement, or thicknesses of the armour cladding around the primary and secondary gunpowder storage and machinery compartments, as that subject would give me nightmares. Finally, on the nebulous subject of the proposed "bloodline" of the A-140 project, one can only draw a few brief conclusions, because much of the archive material was destroyed, both by the relentless incendiary bombinh campaigns of the late-war period, and by intentional obliteration of certain archives to keep secret documents from being seized in the post-war period: 1: During the design study process, many of the main branch proposals were developed in parallel, meaning that the line of development is more akin to a great family tree called "A-140", and the final form of the Yamato type is only one particular fruit plucked from one particular branch of said tree. 2: Because of the anticipated shockwave of the firing of "special type" 41cm guns (extrapolated using data from existing guns before the "special type" had even entered testing), novel solutions for the mitigation of concussive effects were considered from the very beginning of the A-140 project. In particular, the storage of the ships' boats within internal hangars below the deck was considered during the first offical meeting, and remained a common feature to all subsequent variants of the project. Additionally, the basic A-140, as well as the A-140-G, A-140-K, and A-140-J development branches all featured an "all forward" main armament, meaning that all of the primary armament mounts were located ahead of the bridge, such that, although certainly rattled, personnel and equipment on the aft half of the ship would not be directly exposed to the concussive force of the main armament. At the same time, the "all forward" arrangement was not exclusively an attempt at blast mitigation, but also a means of weight reduction through gathering as much gunpowder as possible into one location to allow for increased protection (while simultaneously making compromises in the protection of the machinery spaces further aft). 3: The entire A-140 design study was carried out by mostly the same naval architects who had previously worked on the Myoko, Takao, and Mogami classes of cruisers, with at least one of the A-140 branches ("-G", I think) being developed by the Naval General Staff, drawing some inspiration from the original A-140 proposal and its the initial eight branches (-A, -B, -C, -D, -A1, -A2, -B1, and -B2). As such, a certain visual design lineage is inevitable. 4: The final design, "-F6", was a sub-variant of the A-140-F branch, which originally exhibited a normal displacement of 60'350 tonnes, a waterline length of 247m, an AB-X main armament layout with a two-gun turret followed by a three-gun turret, followed by the superstructure, followed by another three-gun turret, for a total of 8 "special type" 41 cm guns (i.e. the top-secret 46cm weapon). Adding to this, a significant portion of the displacement difference between "-F" and "-F6" was also due to an increase in fuel oil capacity. And at the same time, the original "-F" wasn't even amongst the first eight design branches. 5: AB-X main armament layouts using three three-gun turrets carrying "special type" 41 cm guns were used on the "-A1" and "-B1", which were members of the initial eight branches from the basic A-140 proposal, but aside from this, the "-A1" and "-B1" differed drastically from the later "-F" branch as a whole and "-F6" in particular, in terms of the arrangement of the secondary and tertiary gun mounts (as in the case of branch "-F", two of the 15,5 cm gun turrets were mounted along the ship's centreline, and one on either side of the superstructure, *but* both of the centreline 15,5 cm turrets were aft of the superstructure, and the aft of this pair was nounted higher than the other, such that, from the oerspective if the forward turret, its view direcrly ajead was lbsteucted by the superstructure, and its view directly aktern was obstructed both by the raised barbette of its taller sibling, and if this taller sibling had disappeared, the view aft would still be blotted out by the enormous armoured gun house of the aft main armament turret. The propulsion machinery differed as well, as "-F6" used steam-only propulsion, whereas ALL members of branch "-A" used a mixed steam and diesel propulsion system, and ALL members of branch "-B" used a diesel-only propulsion system. To summarize: the A-140 design studies were a sprawling mess (which is not inherently a bad thing!), but all of these many branches would inevitable re-use at least some successful design principles from previous ships, as well as certain features from previously examined branches within the A-140 project itself. As such, the "final form" was not apparent at the beginning of the project, or even halfway through it. Rather, it only appears obvious in hindsight. Specific design elements appear at earlier stages of the project, such as the main armament layout of nine "special type" 41 cm guns in three three-gun turrets arranged according to the AB-X pattern, as well as the undulating upper deck, but these features are not continuous throughout the design process; they appear, together or in isolation, and then disappear, and then appear again, according to what seems "workable" to the naval architects at each particular moment. If there is *one* common theme throughout the A-140 project, it's the general obsession with ever-larger main guns, and below-deck shelters for the ships' boats.
大和の製作総集編を公開しました！是非お楽しみください♪👇
ruclips.net/video/oQx__4qvfP4/видео.html
装飾ってどうやったんですか！？
いつもプラモデルやるとスプレーでやってもなんか色が付いたり付いてないとこであったりして
ディアゴスティーニ「今週は土嚢！」
@さかしそん の片翼！
@@ゆらたみ空白 につける塗料!
@@アリエール公式チャンネル の素材！
@士 武 を取るための道具！
@@ミルキヌ海晴 のパーツ！
どうして日本の戦艦ってこうも美しいんだろうか。。。
呼んだ？
@@ihoukentikukan い、違法艦橋建築ｯ!!だがそれがいいｯ
@@YamatoSpirit1941 ディ・モールトグラッツェ
違法建築は美しいのね
@@f6p47k5？
最後に 菊の御紋 つけるのが良きね！
見る分にはすごい楽しいけど
これくらいの大きさと部品点数、
器用さと根気に自信ないから
ホントに敬遠しちゃうなぁ……
コメントありがとうございます😊
とても励みになりました！
またご視聴よろしくお願いします🤲
精巧に作れば作るほど切なくなる
最後に菊花紋を取り付けるところに、画竜点睛、大和への敬意を感じるのが好き！
まさに機能美の集大成。当時の技術力恐るべし。
コメントありがとうございます♪同感です。
素晴らしいです‼️
「皇国ノ興廃コノ一戦ニアリ‼️」
次世代型の大和とか作れちゃう腕に尊敬
大和って、最初からこの最終形態を見越してのデザインが考慮されていたのか？と思うくらいに美しい。
The development of battleship project A-140 involved the study of more than 20 different layouts, with different top speeds, operational ranges (fuel capacity), cruising speeds, either full diesel or full steam propulsion (and also combined steam and diesel propulsion concepts).
In terms of armament, the use of 12,7 cm twin mounts and 15,5 cm three-gun turrets was assumed by default, but the number of twin 12,7 cm mounts and 15,5 cm turrets varied, as well as their placement.
Naturally, these variations in the placement of secondary and tertiary armament was determined by constraints above deck due to the placement of the primary armament and superstructure, and below deck by the arrangement of the gunppwder storage for the primary armament on the one hand, and by the arrangement of boiler rooms and machinery spaces in other cases (that is, the steam turbines of the shafts for primary propulsion (of which most proposals had four, I beloeve) cannot coexist with the foundation and ammunition storage of a 15,5 cm three-gun turret, so wherever there is a turbine room, a turret cannot be placed directly above it, and the placement of the 15,5 cm turrets goes on to determine the possible arrangements of the tertiary (12,7 cm) armament, etc.
As for the primary armament, it was not only the final "special type" 41 cm gun that was considered, but also a longer version of the same (for increased muzzle velocity, but ultimately considered too expensive and too heavy), as well as improved versions of the normal 41 cm gun.
Arrangements varied between three three-gun turrets carrying the modernized 41 cm guns, for a total of 9, or four such turrets with the same gun, for a total of 12, and in the case of the "special type" 41 cm, there were proposals for either one two-gun turret and two three-gun turrets for 8 guns in total, or three three-gun turrets for nine guns total, or two two-gun turrets and two three-gun turrets for a total of 10 guns.
And don't ask about the number, arrangement, or thicknesses of the armour cladding around the primary and secondary gunpowder storage and machinery compartments, as that subject would give me nightmares.
Finally, on the nebulous subject of the proposed "bloodline" of the A-140 project, one can only draw a few brief conclusions, because much of the archive material was destroyed, both by the relentless incendiary bombinh campaigns of the late-war period, and by intentional obliteration of certain archives to keep secret documents from being seized in the post-war period:
1: During the design study process, many of the main branch proposals were developed in parallel, meaning that the line of development is more akin to a great family tree called "A-140", and the final form of the Yamato type is only one particular fruit plucked from one particular branch of said tree.
2: Because of the anticipated shockwave of the firing of "special type" 41cm guns (extrapolated using data from existing guns before the "special type" had even entered testing), novel solutions for the mitigation of concussive effects were considered from the very beginning of the A-140 project. In particular, the storage of the ships' boats within internal hangars below the deck was considered during the first offical meeting, and remained a common feature to all subsequent variants of the project.
Additionally, the basic A-140, as well as the A-140-G, A-140-K, and A-140-J development branches all featured an "all forward" main armament, meaning that all of the primary armament mounts were located ahead of the bridge, such that, although certainly rattled, personnel and equipment on the aft half of the ship would not be directly exposed to the concussive force of the main armament.
At the same time, the "all forward" arrangement was not exclusively an attempt at blast mitigation, but also a means of weight reduction through gathering as much gunpowder as possible into one location to allow for increased protection (while simultaneously making compromises in the protection of the machinery spaces further aft).
3: The entire A-140 design study was carried out by mostly the same naval architects who had previously worked on the Myoko, Takao, and Mogami classes of cruisers, with at least one of the A-140 branches ("-G", I think) being developed by the Naval General Staff, drawing some inspiration from the original A-140 proposal and its the initial eight branches (-A, -B, -C, -D, -A1, -A2, -B1, and -B2).
As such, a certain visual design lineage is inevitable.
4: The final design, "-F6", was a sub-variant of the A-140-F branch, which originally exhibited a normal displacement of 60'350 tonnes, a waterline length of 247m, an AB-X main armament layout with a two-gun turret followed by a three-gun turret, followed by the superstructure, followed by another three-gun turret, for a total of 8 "special type" 41 cm guns (i.e. the top-secret 46cm weapon).
Adding to this, a significant portion of the displacement difference between "-F" and "-F6" was also due to an increase in fuel oil capacity.
And at the same time, the original "-F" wasn't even amongst the first eight design branches.
5: AB-X main armament layouts using three three-gun turrets carrying "special type" 41 cm guns were used on the "-A1" and "-B1", which were members of the initial eight branches from the basic A-140 proposal, but aside from this, the "-A1" and "-B1" differed drastically from the later "-F" branch as a whole and "-F6" in particular, in terms of the arrangement of the secondary and tertiary gun mounts (as in the case of branch "-F", two of the 15,5 cm gun turrets were mounted along the ship's centreline, and one on either side of the superstructure, *but* both of the centreline 15,5 cm turrets were aft of the superstructure, and the aft of this pair was nounted higher than the other, such that, from the oerspective if the forward turret, its view direcrly ajead was lbsteucted by the superstructure, and its view directly aktern was obstructed both by the raised barbette of its taller sibling, and if this taller sibling had disappeared, the view aft would still be blotted out by the enormous armoured gun house of the aft main armament turret.
The propulsion machinery differed as well, as "-F6" used steam-only propulsion, whereas ALL members of branch "-A" used a mixed steam and diesel propulsion system, and ALL members of branch "-B" used a diesel-only propulsion system.
To summarize: the A-140 design studies were a sprawling mess (which is not inherently a bad thing!), but all of these many branches would inevitable re-use at least some successful design principles from previous ships, as well as certain features from previously examined branches within the A-140 project itself.
As such, the "final form" was not apparent at the beginning of the project, or even halfway through it. Rather, it only appears obvious in hindsight.
Specific design elements appear at earlier stages of the project, such as the main armament layout of nine "special type" 41 cm guns in three three-gun turrets arranged according to the AB-X pattern, as well as the undulating upper deck, but these features are not continuous throughout the design process; they appear, together or in isolation, and then disappear, and then appear again, according to what seems "workable" to the naval architects at each particular moment.
If there is *one* common theme throughout the A-140 project, it's the general obsession with ever-larger main guns, and below-deck shelters for the ships' boats.
素晴らしい!
本当、大和は美しい船ですよねえ。
もっとちゃちいやつだったけど小学生ぐらいの時作って、部品数多すぎて断念したので本当に尊敬します！
また作って見ようかな…
素晴らしい
コメントありがとうございます♪
美しさは古今東西の軍艦の中でも最高峰だよね
船体に対する艦橋の形、主砲の形や大きさ等全体的なバランスが芸術品の域に達しているからね。
すばらしい！
てか欲しいて😂
すごすぎてこれ大和ミュージアムに展示して欲しい
我很愛日本二戰的戰艦和航母和潛艇，他們很獨特也很好看
大和かっけ〜
完成度高〜
凄いです
最近プラモやってないなー
やはり🎌大和魂しか勝たん🎌
船も製作者も素晴らしい👍️最高❗
コメントありがとうございます♪励みになります！
歴史・戦艦好きにはたまらんよなぁ。
金と技術があったら作りたいお(´；Д；`)
ちなみに初めて作った軍艦プラモの戦艦大和は色々と大破
大和は芸術品だよね
25mm三連装機銃やん♡
やっぱ大和は改装後が有名やんな😊
@@user-qv8rm6qy6f 自慢の主砲もさほど当たってないしね。
でもでもー！大和は居るだけでいいのよぉぉー！
菊水2号作戦仕様だ🤣
？
非理法権天だぁ！
菊の紋が、かっこいい
船の形した要塞かw 火力凄まじそう
頑張りましたね
大和、武蔵、赤城等艦隊にして並べたいなぁ(*^^*)
三番艦からの空母の信濃は？
フルスクラッチ❓スゲ～😃
製作精美❤😊
すごっ😮
おお、懐かしいです！ って言ってみたかったボク。
The big target !!!
素晴らしい！旭日旗最高！
形がいいですね。
カッコイイ！
やっぱ対空砲少ないなぁ
ファランクス20基設しますか⭐️！
I love it 😍😍😍
凄‼︎
凄いですね👍️✨ずっとピンセットですか～🙀
非理法権天の幟が渋いですね、当時の大和に肉迫攻撃を行った米軍機パイロットも一瞬目で追ったのでは無いでしょうかね？
すげーリアル
Ese Yamato se ve tan hermoso como cuando lo hundieron hace 79 años
すげーです^_^
ありがとうございます♪
私は戦艦バーラムが大好きです
Wow!
それもとから塗装されてる？
YAMATO DA CLASSE MUSASHI UM SUPER NAVIO DE BATALHA JAPONÊS 🇯🇵🇧🇷
大和ミュージアムに置いてもいいレベル
それな
無駄死にさせずに戦後まで残して欲しかったな
賠償金代わりに台湾にでもくれてやった方が良かった
非理法権天の旗が泣ける…
大和は戦艦の中で一番好き(≧▽≦)
リールじゃなくて、多分ドラムとかウィンチドラムなはず。大艦巨砲主義の究極形態にはロマンがあるねぇ
海軍旗って日本に1個しかないらしいね
簡単そうに作ってるけど、簡単じゃないんだよね～
とくにエッチングパーツとか
お父さんがこの大和型1番艦を作る時対空砲とか大変だったらしい
「二番高角砲被弾！」
若い時大きいの作ったけど、飾る場所がない。どちらかと言えば私今は大和より武蔵派です。
本物は、真っ二つになって、九州沖で眠っているらしいですね…
坊の岬に
宇宙戦艦ヤマトの沈んだ大和からヤマトが出てくるシーン、カッコ良かったです。
しかもバラバラ…
宇宙戦艦ヤマトの西崎プロデューサーがそれを聞いてがっかりしたそうです。
初めは戦艦大和をくり抜いて作った、という設定が、沈没地点で造艦した、と変わってますね。
@@inari-yebisu 制作当時は未だ沈没した艦体がどうなっていたか、はっきりしてなかったからですね。
Is this the Nichimo 1/200 scale?
89式連装高角砲の所途中から九六式13ミリ連装機銃になっとる
大日本帝国万歳！
大和魂万歳！
沖縄特攻時の擬装ですね。
つまり、死装束。
そこに噴進砲と晴嵐と51cm砲...
おぉ、ちょいちょい欲張るな欲張るな
ヤマトタケル?
こまけぇ…
大和って坊ノ岬沖海戦の時は前か後ろの空中線なくなかった？
大和って良く見てみたらハリネズミみたいだな
大和の機銃は自動補給にすべきやった。人力で弾丸運搬とかリスク高すぎw
Yamato kawaii
質問です、日本海軍の戦艦のなかで 一番好きな戦艦は、なんですか？
金剛
めさのさんがその努力を台無しにする動画をUPしてる。菊水作戦時、艦首と艦尾の空中配線は戦闘中に切断したら危険なので全部カットしてあったそうな。あと、艦首の菊の御紋は1メートルしかないのでコレより一回り小さいんだと。
菊の十六紋が最高にクール
主砲塔直下に爆竹入れれば完璧
天一号作戦時の大和ですか？
マジレスするとこの頃の大和は安全性の問題とかで空中線は撤去されてる
（天一号作戦時の大和）
JS Yamato
昔テレビで現代に建造したら費用は一兆超えるって言ってた
1からの開発になるからもうちょいかかる。
三式弾開発する前に、89式高角砲を新型開発すべきだったな。
むき出しの対空砲怖い
そうか？
シールド付きの対空砲に着弾すると、シールドそのものが鉄片としてシールド内を飛び回るわけですが。
@@inari-yebisu 下手な装甲よりも土嚢とかのほうが安全と言う事ですね。
でもやっぱり怖い！((( ；ﾟДﾟ)))
戦艦より客船派
🎉
大和の喫水線は緑色だったという噂は本当ですかね？
こういうの見るとプラモ作ってみたいなって思うけど、超がつくほど不器用なワイには無理
ひりほうけんてん
どへ～😮
最後は前から見て左側に沈む😢
非理法権天!!
あれだけ武装積んでて零戦乗るんか...バケモンかよ
零式水上偵察機だよ
と言うか今更だけど甲板に土嚢積める位の大きさだったんだなってなった
カタパルトについてる飛行機飛ばして着水したあとどうやって引き上げるんやろ
クレーンでｳｨｰﾝｳｨｰﾝ…ガシャって持ち上げる見たいっすよ
クレーン
クレーン⁉️
本編へのリンクが欲しい。
説明欄にプレイリストへのリンクが貼り付けていますので、是非ご利用下さい。
美しいですねぇ(๑•̀ㅁ•́ฅ✨
大和にカタパルトあったんや…
非理法権天！
デアゴ？
コメントありがとうございます♪ハセガワのプラモデルになります。