Muslim Women Entitled to Alimony on Divorce, Supreme Court Rules in Landmark Decision | UPSC

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 9 июл 2024
  • Use the code ‘ANKITLIVE’ to get Our Courses at a Maximum discount!
    Hurry Enroll Now : studyiq.u9ilnk.me/d/Npg4cicHxZ
    UPSC IAS Live GS Foundation 2025 P2I New Season Batch 2 : studyiq.u9ilnk.me/d/Npg4cicHxZ
    Admissions Closing on 10th July 2024 | Daily Live Classes at 6:00 PM
    Hurry Enroll Now : studyiq.u9ilnk.me/d/Npg4cicHxZ
    Features of UPSC P2I Batches
    - 1000+ hours Live Classes
    - Success in Prelims program
    - Mains Residential Program
    - Interview Guidance Program
    - One to One Mentorship
    - Answer Writing Program
    - Current Affairs Program
    - Handwritten Notes
    - Prelims and Mains Test series
    and much more…..
    In this video, we explore the landmark Supreme Court ruling that entitles Muslim women to alimony on divorce. We analyze the judgment's impact on women's rights and its significance in the context of Indian law. This decision marks a major step towards gender equality. Watch to understand the implications of this ruling for UPSC aspirants.
    Super 100 GS Foundation 2025 P2I Offline Batch 3 - ORN
    Offline Classes Starting on 10th July 2024, 6:00 PM
    Hurry Enroll Now : studyiq.u9ilnk.me/d/tfgpoQuP7t
    UPSC IAS Live GS Foundation 2025 P2I New Season English Batch
    Admissions Closing on 10th July 2024 | Daily Live Classes at 6:00 PM
    Hurry Enroll Now : studyiq.u9ilnk.me/d/X3pZrpYKIH
    UPSC IAS Live GS Foundation 2025 P2I New Season Hindi Batch 2
    एडमिशन की अंतिम तिथि 10 जुलाई 2024 l बैच का समय शाम 6:00 बजे
    Hurry Enroll Now : studyiq.u9ilnk.me/d/ogzkeFrQft
    UPSC IAS Long Term P2I Foundation LIVE 2026 Batch 9
    Batch Starting on 13th July 2024 | Daily Live Classes at 6:00 PM
    Hurry Enroll Now : studyiq.u9ilnk.me/d/Lgsok33byQ
    UPSC IAS (Mains) LIVE Optional Batches : studyiq.u9ilnk.me/d/yDin8XnLj2
    State PSC Live Foundation Batches : studyiq.u9ilnk.me/d/go1f3YPhfx
    Gaurav Sir Current Affairs bit.ly/3jwDRsv
    Complete Static GK by Dr. Gaurav Garg bit.ly/3O0FaxE
    Banking Awareness (Static) by Dr Gaurav Garg bit.ly/36dElAI
    Buy our Best Selling UPSC CSE Books
    From Online Stores: studyiq.u9ilnk.me/d/d3294c7zR6
    Read all Information Rich Blogs & Articles here - www.studyiq.com/articles/
    📌 Connect with [Our Social Media Platform] :
    ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
    Join our Telegram Group:- t.me/Studyiqeducation
    Whatsapp Channel - bit.ly/3M1i8Ya
    Facebook: bit.ly/3PZTJDo
    Instagram: bit.ly/48RZNGO
    Twitter: bit.ly/48On8t7
    Download the App to Subscribe to the Course - bit.ly/StudyiqApp
    For any doubt, Call 080-6897-3353 or Click here for Whatsapp Chat wa.me/917703861353
    #ALIMONY #SUPREMECOURT #HINDULAW #LANDMARKJUDGEMENT #NEWS #LATEST #INDIA #CURRENTAFFAIRS #STUDYIQ #STUDYIQIAS #UPSCPREPARATION #UPSC #UPSCCSE

Комментарии • 864

  • @studyiqofficial
    @studyiqofficial  16 дней назад +25

    Use the code ‘ANKITLIVE’ to get Our Courses at a Maximum discount!
    Hurry Enroll Now : studyiq.u9ilnk.me/d/Npg4cicHxZ
    UPSC IAS Live GS Foundation 2025 P2I New Season Batch 2 : studyiq.u9ilnk.me/d/Npg4cicHxZ
    Admissions Closing on 10th July 2024 | Daily Live Classes at 6:00 PM
    Hurry Enroll Now : studyiq.u9ilnk.me/d/Npg4cicHxZ
    For any UPSC CSE course-related queries, please WhatsApp - bit.ly/wame8952084937
    Super 100 GS Foundation 2025 P2I Offline Batch 3 - ORN
    Offline Classes Starting on 10th July 2024, 6:00 PM
    Hurry Enroll Now : studyiq.u9ilnk.me/d/tfgpoQuP7t
    UPSC IAS Live GS Foundation 2025 P2I New Season English Batch
    Admissions Closing on 10th July 2024 | Daily Live Classes at 6:00 PM
    Hurry Enroll Now : studyiq.u9ilnk.me/d/X3pZrpYKIH
    UPSC IAS Live GS Foundation 2025 P2I New Season Hindi Batch 2
    एडमिशन की अंतिम तिथि 10 जुलाई 2024 l बैच का समय शाम 6:00 बजे
    Hurry Enroll Now : studyiq.u9ilnk.me/d/ogzkeFrQft
    UPSC IAS Long Term P2I Foundation LIVE 2026 Batch 9
    Batch Starting on 13th July 2024 | Daily Live Classes at 6:00 PM
    Hurry Enroll Now : studyiq.u9ilnk.me/d/Lgsok33byQ
    UPSC IAS (Mains) LIVE Optional Batches : studyiq.u9ilnk.me/d/yDin8XnLj2

    • @Your-L0ver
      @Your-L0ver 16 дней назад

      A is answer

    • @imtiazakand3174
      @imtiazakand3174 15 дней назад

      Such law will encourage divorce given by women and encourage gold digging.

  • @sagarshetty3175
    @sagarshetty3175 16 дней назад +999

    just bring in UCC . this beating around bush needs to stop

    • @6kkaAĺlàh
      @6kkaAĺlàh 16 дней назад +92

      UCC AYEGA KATÙA ROTA REH JYEGA

    • @6kkaAĺlàh
      @6kkaAĺlàh 16 дней назад +78

      As Allàh i confirm

    • @6kkaAĺlàh
      @6kkaAĺlàh 16 дней назад +54

      ​@@HarshaVardhanSarihaddhuits a rare pic of Muhammď 😃captured by Israel soilders😊

    • @BrahminMaky
      @BrahminMaky 16 дней назад +15

      +1 UCC + NRC is Much much required specially with Illegal Immigrants coming from Bangladesh are flooding the Train Stations it's High time

    • @BrahminMaky
      @BrahminMaky 16 дней назад +13

      ​@@6kkaAĺlàhThanks Dallah😭🤝

  • @topratedpastor7953
    @topratedpastor7953 16 дней назад +477

    This Decision is a MasterStroke in Reducing India’s Population😂😂

    • @VikramSingh-fd9uj
      @VikramSingh-fd9uj 16 дней назад

      This will reduce the divorce and Luv Jihaad, As alimony will bring them under the Law.😂

    • @devobravo
      @devobravo 16 дней назад

      😂😂😂

    • @Mein_tha_don
      @Mein_tha_don 16 дней назад +20

      Ab ye baar baar shadi nhi karenge....agar karenge to baar baar alimony Deni padhegi

    • @naruto654_
      @naruto654_ 16 дней назад +19

      Lekin 1 billion to Hindu hai 😂.

    • @naruto654_
      @naruto654_ 16 дней назад +12

      Lekin 1 billion to Hindu hai😂.

  • @RAJRAVI0801
    @RAJRAVI0801 16 дней назад +461

    This was needed before 70 years

    • @HillariousPanda16
      @HillariousPanda16 16 дней назад +18

      Had this decision come during Indira or Rajiv time then this wld have been scrapped and sc decision wld have been overturned ..... but still people think there is dictatorship now

    • @brightvision5371
      @brightvision5371 16 дней назад

      ये साले जहाँ जहां औरत जी बात होती है वहा शरिया कानून का हवाला देते है, जब क्राइम करते है साले तो सँविधान सँविधान चिलाने लगते है।

    • @Moe-Moe121
      @Moe-Moe121 16 дней назад +2

      New type of beggars alimony😂😂😂.
      Suicide rate of males in divorce is 70-80 % what henies law...

    • @sarvottam4097
      @sarvottam4097 16 дней назад

      Caste should have ended 1000 years ago and we still follow

    • @menarebrave03
      @menarebrave03 16 дней назад +8

      ​@@sarvottam4097 yesss caste and caste based reservation both needs a fullstop

  • @moglie123
    @moglie123 16 дней назад +512

    अब इनके हिसाब से फिर संविधान खतरे में आ जायेगा 😅😅😅

    • @guptaji846
      @guptaji846 16 дней назад +1

      संविधान नहीं,
      चुसलाम खतरे में पड़ जायेगा,,

    • @K2A-Hu-Akbar
      @K2A-Hu-Akbar 16 дней назад +48

      6 Sal ki Nibbi🧕🏻aur 55 sal ka bdsuart budda guhammď👺

    • @focus7948
      @focus7948 16 дней назад +14

      Inka nautanki bhut jld bnd hoga

    • @masalabeauty
      @masalabeauty 16 дней назад

      जैसा तुम्हारे लिए आ गया था जब फेंसले हिन्दू के खिलाफ आये थे।

    • @ankitkumargupta546
      @ankitkumargupta546 16 дней назад +9

      Samvidhan khtre me hai 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

  • @divyamrathi299
    @divyamrathi299 16 дней назад +269

    77 years baad bhi Supreme Court mai esse case aa rahe hai .

    • @abiishekmahendrakar9710
      @abiishekmahendrakar9710 16 дней назад +20

      we one nation one law we need UCC

    • @WORLDISMYFAMILY7
      @WORLDISMYFAMILY7 16 дней назад

      😂cry hard

    • @sahilsharma4448
      @sahilsharma4448 16 дней назад

      @@WORLDISMYFAMILY7Aagya k2we apne Dallah ki chaatne😂

    • @anthonymartino1901
      @anthonymartino1901 16 дней назад

      Yes we dalits and Shudras are Bharat majority​… So UCC should be based on us not on brahmani@@abiishekmahendrakar9710

  • @IMAABIDI
    @IMAABIDI 16 дней назад +94

    يعيش الهند العظمى Jai Bharat from Makkah, Saudi Arabia

  • @ashesofhopesinabonfireofdr6341
    @ashesofhopesinabonfireofdr6341 16 дней назад +342

    4 shaadi karne waale ab 1 shaadi karne se pehle bhi 4 baar sochenge 🤣.

    • @K2A-Hu-Akbar
      @K2A-Hu-Akbar 16 дней назад +45

      K2A be like- 😭😭😭😭

    • @shabeerali1256
      @shabeerali1256 16 дней назад +10

      Both those who prefer girl friends they can keep as much as they want 😂

    • @6kkaAĺlàh
      @6kkaAĺlàh 16 дней назад +36

      ​@@shabeerali1256as allàh i disagree

    • @AstitvaMishra-ed6fg
      @AstitvaMishra-ed6fg 16 дней назад

      mtlb sudhrenge nahi 😂. Ha waise baat to sahi hai legally sirf ek se shadi karenge to divorce ke baad sirf legal wife hi alimony demand kar paegi​@@shabeerali1256

    • @homosapien5442
      @homosapien5442 16 дней назад +20

      ​@@shabeerali1256so this is teaching of your family and so called AASMAANI KITAAB.

  • @mm-fb7vv
    @mm-fb7vv 16 дней назад +230

    Owaisi.. abhi bolie Jay samvidhan. Abhi 4 bibi saadi karo

    • @Simon12822
      @Simon12822 16 дней назад +4

      to kya 5 vai se 1 mahila sadhi karege.

    • @azaibraja3704
      @azaibraja3704 16 дней назад +4

      Bagwan ram ky panch baap thy ... bageshwar dham kehty hain ...abb bol kisne 5 shadiyan ki

    • @BiblioPhagist-mn2el
      @BiblioPhagist-mn2el 16 дней назад +6

      ​@@azaibraja3704 pigabar fuudamaad k aasli baap kon tha? Gattar putro ....

    • @BiblioPhagist-mn2el
      @BiblioPhagist-mn2el 16 дней назад

      ​@@azaibraja3704 gattar se nikla moojhub ka gattar aaulado....

    • @AniruddhaSathe-ir6lw
      @AniruddhaSathe-ir6lw 16 дней назад +1

      ​@@azaibraja3704Muhammad ne 11 shadiya ki aur uski paas 55 randiya uske haram me thi 💯 aur wo apni bahu ke saath sota tha ! Ab bol kisne 11 shadiya ki 😂

  • @kamalchauhans
    @kamalchauhans 16 дней назад +139

    वो पूछना था कि संविधान, लोकतंत्र, और सेकुलरिज्म सुरक्षित है या खतरे में आ गए।

    • @masalabeauty
      @masalabeauty 16 дней назад

      जब हिन्दू लड़की मुस्लिम से शादी करती है तब भी सुप्रीम कोर्ट की ही चलेगी न? या तब सुप्रीम कोठा हो जाएगा?

    • @_unknown-ru2or
      @_unknown-ru2or 16 дней назад +8

      Supreme kotha​@@masalabeauty

    • @PNY-erea
      @PNY-erea 16 дней назад +5

      ​@@masalabeautytab bhi supreme court ki hi chalti h

    • @masalabeauty
      @masalabeauty 16 дней назад +1

      @@_unknown-ru2or तभी राम मंदिर बना।

    • @masalabeauty
      @masalabeauty 16 дней назад +1

      @@PNY-erea उसी की चलनी चाहिए, पर ये कुछ लोग सिलेक्टिव तरीके से देखते है यह गलत है।

  • @ashesofhopesinabonfireofdr6341
    @ashesofhopesinabonfireofdr6341 16 дней назад +384

    यह देश संविधान से चलेगा, जिन्हें इस्लामि कानून चाहिए वो इस्लामि देश चले जाएं।
    भारत में सभी को समान अधिकार हैं और सभी के लिये कानून समान रहेगा।
    शरीया चाहिए तो अफ़ग़ानिस्तान चले जाओ, वैसे भी उन्हें भारतीय लोग पसंद हैं।

    • @6kkaAĺlàh
      @6kkaAĺlàh 16 дней назад +40

      SECULARS KO KOI FARAK NAI PADEGA THEY WILL STILL SAY- HINDU KATUÀ BHAI BHAI😅

    • @raunaqueafroz7
      @raunaqueafroz7 16 дней назад +12

      Haan India, Indian Constitution se chalega aur constitution me secularism hai.
      Jisko secularism nhi pasand wo duniya chhod do kyu ki uske liye koi desh nhi 😅

    • @6kkaAĺlàh
      @6kkaAĺlàh 16 дней назад

      ​@@raunaqueafroz7han to k20 ko dunia chor deni chaie fir to

    • @6kkaAĺlàh
      @6kkaAĺlàh 16 дней назад +32

      ​@@raunaqueafroz7yani muslims ko?

    • @cinematicbros1890
      @cinematicbros1890 16 дней назад

      ​@@raunaqueafroz7 i love secularism but I hate pseudo secularism and people like you

  • @mrpranjul7727
    @mrpranjul7727 16 дней назад +98

    70 saal baad SC ko justice ki yad agai

    • @Study-nh8ej
      @Study-nh8ej 16 дней назад +9

      Joker h supreme court ....... 3 baar faisla badal diya

    • @ajay.44
      @ajay.44 16 дней назад

      Mi"lord" hai wo

    • @rddelta1606
      @rddelta1606 16 дней назад

      Naacho mat, yeh kanoon bhi , Kabhi bhi badal saktha hain ...Aisa system hain hamaara.

    • @shuklabiswas790
      @shuklabiswas790 15 дней назад +1

      SC had given justice in 1985 Shah Bano case . But Pappu's dad changed it in 1986 at the request of some mullah leaders .

  • @Numerical07
    @Numerical07 16 дней назад +17

    People in some communities feel so entitled and pampered.... There's a limit to it.... Seriously

  • @pingping6967
    @pingping6967 16 дней назад +10

    Fees to SC Lawyer✅
    Alimony to Wife❌
    😂😂😂😂

  • @ishwarsingh8303
    @ishwarsingh8303 16 дней назад +105

    Good decision ☺️

    • @user-qg6hg8ih9k
      @user-qg6hg8ih9k 16 дней назад

      Koi cheez buri ishleya nahi hoti ki usme burai hai ❤ balki isliye hoti hai ki wo apne burai sudharne ki koshish nahi karte ❤ love from constitution ❤

  • @yashwintomar-zi8tr
    @yashwintomar-zi8tr 16 дней назад +21

    govt. schemes : for muslims
    waqf board : for muslims
    pm awas yojana : majorly benefits rohangiyas
    mecca free trip : for muslims
    govt subsidy for minority institutions : for muslims
    .
    meanwhile hindus giving all their temple money to govt........:(

    • @mehak-GB
      @mehak-GB 16 дней назад +3

      cry more

    • @JustMe54328
      @JustMe54328 16 дней назад

      Govt is useless, will not do an NRC and CAA and throw out Bangladeshis and rohingyas

    • @prajwaltrivedi7052
      @prajwaltrivedi7052 16 дней назад +3

      ​@@mehak-GB we will make you cry in nearby time 😂

    • @indiangirl727
      @indiangirl727 14 дней назад +1

      Hypocrisy of Indian constitution

    • @shabeerali1256
      @shabeerali1256 4 дня назад

      @@prajwaltrivedi7052 Mongols tried. We cried. The they joined us. We together made others cry. So try.

  • @akilsk7333
    @akilsk7333 16 дней назад +17

    This is very dangerous for man irrespective of religion... carefully chose your partner..

    • @Pikachu-ys8pz
      @Pikachu-ys8pz 14 дней назад

      Saap sa behaviour kese malum chalega?

    • @subhajitdas292
      @subhajitdas292 2 часа назад

      Yes. Men should keep all there property in the name of Trust organization.

    • @Pikachu-ys8pz
      @Pikachu-ys8pz 35 минут назад

      @@subhajitdas292 trust leke bhaag gya toh

    • @subhajitdas292
      @subhajitdas292 24 минуты назад

      @@Pikachu-ys8pz Nehi nehi Trust per tumhari ownership hoga.
      Kiuki yea NGO firm hai. Isliye yea paisa sirf tumhari hai.
      But to create this Trust org it will cost Rs.75k

    • @Pikachu-ys8pz
      @Pikachu-ys8pz 18 минут назад +1

      @@subhajitdas292 atcha yeh baat hai
      Future mei kaam ayega Jo yeh comment dekhega

  • @Shivamkumar-oy4zm
    @Shivamkumar-oy4zm 16 дней назад +32

    What's the point of divorce if husband still need to maintain his ex wife . Isn't divorce meant to be free from responsibility of their spouse . This sense of entitlement needs to be stopped.

    • @Knowmore55555
      @Knowmore55555 16 дней назад +16

      At least some hindu talking with sense. Otherwise, all hindu talking out of jealousy

    • @JustMe54328
      @JustMe54328 16 дней назад +7

      In that case marry a working woman who can maintain herself, who files income tax on her personal income every year. Or pays property tax on her own name.
      In this case u need not pay any alimony.

    • @Knowmore55555
      @Knowmore55555 15 дней назад +8

      @@JustMe54328 nowadays most of the women are working only. Did you hear this famous saying of women: “his money is our money, but my money is only mine” something like that

    • @JustMe54328
      @JustMe54328 15 дней назад +1

      @@Knowmore55555 yes but informal employment is tougher to prove, formal employment, u can just show the ITR proof or GST returns proof

    • @TimeWaster-kv4in
      @TimeWaster-kv4in 15 дней назад

      👍

  • @azaibraja3704
    @azaibraja3704 16 дней назад +9

    A person who truly understands their own religion can never criticise other religions.

  • @chandankumargupta8174
    @chandankumargupta8174 16 дней назад +63

    Only wife sacrifice itself not husband and if husband have no job and wife have job then wife have to give maintaince to husband

    • @amitbhuriya1561
      @amitbhuriya1561 16 дней назад +6

      Without divorce or with divorce 😂😂 doesn't matter they is not law 😭😭

    • @_cosmic_aurora_gameofcones
      @_cosmic_aurora_gameofcones 16 дней назад +11

      True.....if wife is working then husband should do all housework A to Z,taking care of children, family and after divorce, maintenance should be given to him

    • @satyarthranjan7025
      @satyarthranjan7025 16 дней назад +4

      bhai yahi tho widambana hai aj ke humare desh ki

    • @Sarridon
      @Sarridon 16 дней назад +4

      Yes, and a husband has to do all the housework and also bear the children.

    • @chandankumargupta8174
      @chandankumargupta8174 16 дней назад +1

      But husband can't milking infant 😂

  • @sachhinGB
    @sachhinGB 16 дней назад +103

    Momin personal law/ waqf ke
    ❤️ Day lag gaye.
    जबरदस्ती, खामोखा तलाक थोपे गए
    Momin बहनों के लिए अपना हक मांग सके,
    इस नजरिये से उनके लिये अछे दिन आइये।

    • @rajbiswas249
      @rajbiswas249 16 дней назад +10

      Supreme court ka loud speakers pe bhi ban ka order hai,,,,, lekin kuch hua kya

    • @Shital-Vaishnav831
      @Shital-Vaishnav831 16 дней назад +16

      ​@@rajbiswas249wo log koi law ko mante bhi nahi hai
      UCC bhi nahi manne wale wo
      Because they believe in Mohammad laws as supreme laws

    • @webcoder293
      @webcoder293 16 дней назад +7

      ​@@Shital-Vaishnav831 bilkul sahi, ye law bas paper pe rhe jayga aur agar koi divorced woman paise magne jayegi ex-husband se toh wahi usko khtm kr diya jayga aur kisiko pata bhi nhi chalega😑

    • @DARKTruth17
      @DARKTruth17 16 дней назад +1

      Sharia law which allows s@x with bonded women and can marry small girl child 😢​@@Shital-Vaishnav831

    • @6kkaAĺlàh
      @6kkaAĺlàh 16 дней назад +5

      Momino ka bàp here

  • @gauravkumargupta9622
    @gauravkumargupta9622 16 дней назад +18

    Section 125 needs to be amended. It says even if the child is illegitimate the huband has to pay alimony.

    • @achu10mech41
      @achu10mech41 16 дней назад +2

      If it is his child he has to pay legitimate or illegitimate

    • @gamingcreatesworlddd2425
      @gamingcreatesworlddd2425 15 дней назад +1

      What kind of justice is this this is plain injustice

    • @achu10mech41
      @achu10mech41 15 дней назад +1

      @@gamingcreatesworlddd2425 what injustice in this??

    • @bonapetits
      @bonapetits 15 дней назад

      ha, baccha to hein uska na? dna test karwau aur agar baccha nikla, toh child support do

    • @mohammadbilal9618
      @mohammadbilal9618 15 дней назад

      ​@@gamingcreatesworlddd2425aur Karo ucc aur support karo kal ko tu bhi apni only fans wife ko alimony dega

  • @raghunathbhoi3852
    @raghunathbhoi3852 16 дней назад +7

    Supreme court about Maintenance 💪
    Supreme Court about Waqf Board🤐

  • @rhushirajbandal7831
    @rhushirajbandal7831 16 дней назад +116

    Male a special protection act for ex Muslims.

  • @gopalsharma5183
    @gopalsharma5183 16 дней назад +29

    جئے شری رام

  • @SahilSingh-by6jq
    @SahilSingh-by6jq 16 дней назад +8

    When will court bring gender neutral rules , and consider each divorce with logic and morality.

  • @ankitagrahari1999
    @ankitagrahari1999 16 дней назад +10

    Abdul is crying in the corner 🤡

    • @khamzat-dh2ze
      @khamzat-dh2ze 16 дней назад

      I m happy

    • @amsam345
      @amsam345 16 дней назад

      Aja Abdul nahi chodega apni began jaan ko. 😂

  • @bhagatsingh_1993
    @bhagatsingh_1993 16 дней назад +30

    10:32 🇶 *_Which of the following statements is_* *incorrect* *_about_* *Fundamental Rights ?*
    ✅ Answer:- *[🇦] New technologies may endanger these rights*
    *_जय हिन्द ।। जय भारत ।। वंदेमातरम् ।।_* 🇮🇳 🙏🏽

  • @Jay-rd5vs
    @Jay-rd5vs 16 дней назад +10

    Ucc should implement

  • @shabeerali1256
    @shabeerali1256 16 дней назад +20

    This will not affect those who prefer girl friends over wives 😂

    • @ALJ1HAD
      @ALJ1HAD 16 дней назад +1

      Matlab ?

    • @shabeerali1256
      @shabeerali1256 16 дней назад +1

      @@ALJ1HAD Girl friends ko dump karoge tho maintenance nahi dena padega

    • @ALJ1HAD
      @ALJ1HAD 16 дней назад +3

      @@shabeerali1256
      Girlfriends se hamein kya lena dena ?
      Wo to HARAM hai

    • @sahilsarang6945
      @sahilsarang6945 16 дней назад +4

      ​@@ALJ1HADAre ab sb chalta hai 🙏🤣

    • @BhootBhagao-bg7ej
      @BhootBhagao-bg7ej 16 дней назад +2

      Agar gf apni pe aa jaye to biwi jitna dukh de skati hai aur court ke bhi chakkar katwa sakti hai.

  • @ShubhOam
    @ShubhOam 16 дней назад +59

    जब शांतिप्रिय को संविधान पसंद है तो अलग कानून क्यूँ, कहां गए नीले भाई,संविधान का meme बना दिया है
    😮
    जय भीम जय meme🎉

    • @brightvision5371
      @brightvision5371 16 дней назад

      ये साले जहाँ जहां औरत जी बात होती है वहा शरिया कानून का हवाला देते है, जब क्राइम करते है साले तो सँविधान सँविधान चिलाने लगते है।

    • @riteshshanky528
      @riteshshanky528 16 дней назад

      To savidhan to sabke lie h n. Fir narangi bhaiyo ko b to manna padega

    • @72-sq6uw
      @72-sq6uw 15 дней назад

      नारंगी भाई तो गौतम भी थे 😂​@@riteshshanky528

    • @user-pl1dj6uc7e
      @user-pl1dj6uc7e 12 дней назад

      ​@@riteshshanky528narangi bhai UCC mante hai or hare bhai nahi man rahe hai or uske piche se nile Bhai support kr rahe hai

  • @allno2849
    @allno2849 16 дней назад +8

    LIFE TIME ALIMONY should NOT BE THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT 😡😡😡😡 exception with the case of some serious disability

  • @putin-_-
    @putin-_- 16 дней назад +72

    राजीव गांधी नही वो राजीव खान था 😂😂😂😂😂

    • @ASPIRANT963
      @ASPIRANT963 16 дней назад

      Tumhara baap tha wo

    • @frankdavis5937
      @frankdavis5937 16 дней назад +1

      आप भी ख़ान ही हो चेक करो.

    • @mohammadbilal9618
      @mohammadbilal9618 15 дней назад

      Tumhare mai to illegitimate child ko bhi alimony deni padti hai hindu kuch bolta kyu nahi iss baare mai 🤐🤐

  • @idreeshyder694
    @idreeshyder694 16 дней назад +10

    If women are independent. Why do they want to get paid..

    • @AP-zf2ep
      @AP-zf2ep 13 дней назад

      Bacche ko kon palega🙂

    • @idreeshyder694
      @idreeshyder694 13 дней назад

      @@AP-zf2ep donoo..male works to generate money so that he spends it on his childs requirement.why must she get paid although it is her child also.. Then it is better to get a nanny as she won't demand lakhs..

    • @comedyalbums7202
      @comedyalbums7202 2 дня назад +1

      ​@@AP-zf2epbaap paalega 😅😅khatam

  • @musafir4069
    @musafir4069 16 дней назад +5

    फैसला बहुत ही अच्छा है और महिलाओं के हक में है लेकिन हम एक ऐसा भी फैसला चाहते हैं जिसमें अगर एक बेरोजगार पुरुष किसी नौकरी सुधा महिला से तलाक लेता है तो महिला उस बेरोजगार पुरुष को मेंटेनेंस दे।

    • @vks943
      @vks943 16 дней назад +1

      ये भी ठीक है l पर किसी ऐसे व्यक्ति को पहले कैसे लड़ना होगा कोर्ट में l

    • @anonymous10809
      @anonymous10809 16 дней назад +2

      @@vks943 Kar di na gender neutral baate ab feminists aake roingi aapke replies me

    • @JohneyLall
      @JohneyLall 13 дней назад

      ऐसा कानून है।

  • @CODsilentgameplay
    @CODsilentgameplay 16 дней назад +15

    4 shaadi walooo kaa dil tut gaya😂😂😂Much needed

    • @alliswell1463
      @alliswell1463 16 дней назад +1

      😂meri to abi 3 hui hai ek aur kni baki hai

    • @amsam345
      @amsam345 16 дней назад +4

      Yaha tutaa toh kya? Per jannat mey toh hoors milegi 🤩

    • @IprthmI
      @IprthmI 16 дней назад

      😂​@@alliswell1463

    • @soldier3514
      @soldier3514 16 дней назад

      ​@@amsam3451000 asparas

    • @islamkapapa-i7d
      @islamkapapa-i7d 16 дней назад

      ​@@soldier3514ghada hamara religion moksh prapti ke liye hota hai na ki 1000 aprasa na hi 72 hooro ke liye smjha

  • @nishantraj4553
    @nishantraj4553 16 дней назад +5

    This law should be made retrospective..

  • @nasimakthar1523
    @nasimakthar1523 16 дней назад +7

    Sc dicission is respected but when a woman want to divorce her husband forcefully or for the reason his husband can't bear her desires. Then what shall SC's decision then..I think this law should be implemented for that woman who is divorced by her husband not by her. Other wise this law would be missused.

    • @mehak-GB
      @mehak-GB 16 дней назад +3

      this law is not equally restrospective. It agree to your point that it should be for men who divorce his women only otherwise can be misused.

    • @Ttk00007
      @Ttk00007 16 дней назад +1

      ​@@mehak-GBit always get misused

    • @gamingcreatesworlddd2425
      @gamingcreatesworlddd2425 15 дней назад

      ​@@Ttk00007hmm still no one cares

    • @gamingcreatesworlddd2425
      @gamingcreatesworlddd2425 15 дней назад

      ​@@mehak-GBpeople needs to speak up other wise noone will listen😊

  • @HillariousPanda16
    @HillariousPanda16 16 дней назад +11

    Had this decision come during Indira or Rajiv time then this wld have been scrapped and sc decision wld have been overturned ..... but still people think there is dictatorship now ....such a shame

  • @neodas4782
    @neodas4782 16 дней назад +106

    Marriage fans, cry more 🗿

    • @K2A-Hu-Akbar
      @K2A-Hu-Akbar 16 дней назад +21

      alla to mere pant ke andar latak rha hai apne 2 paigmbro ke sath😊

    • @neodas4782
      @neodas4782 16 дней назад +7

      ​@@K2A-Hu-Akbartrue hai

    • @imddevil
      @imddevil 16 дней назад +5

      😂😂😂😂😂😂​@@K2A-Hu-Akbar

    • @6kkaAĺlàh
      @6kkaAĺlàh 16 дней назад +7

      K2O KI SACCHAI DEKHO SECULARS😃

    • @baktitsonnas6717
      @baktitsonnas6717 16 дней назад +1

      ​@@K2A-Hu-AkbarOr koi naam he toh dedo hindu chriatian jain sabki nam dede. Dum he toh

  • @reasonablereasoning5425
    @reasonablereasoning5425 16 дней назад +7

    It's good that this time government is different otherwise till now a draft would have been prepared to overturn this judgement 😂😂😂

  • @William20247
    @William20247 16 дней назад +5

    Ek person 10,000/- wife ko nahi de sakta...lakho rs. Ki supreme court fee de sakta h🤔🤔

    • @karanrawat5915
      @karanrawat5915 16 дней назад +5

      Self respect kahte hai usse

    • @anonymous10809
      @anonymous10809 16 дней назад +1

      SC ko ek baar fees deni hoti hai wife ko har mahine deni hogi

  • @suvasishsm
    @suvasishsm 16 дней назад +6

    But if that women did job and seeking divorce for extra marital affairs then why that man need give her money?

    • @JustMe54328
      @JustMe54328 16 дней назад +1

      If u can prove this in court u may not oay

    • @gamingcreatesworlddd2425
      @gamingcreatesworlddd2425 15 дней назад +3

      ​@@JustMe54328in Gujarat even though it was proved still that case was turned against male

  • @saurabh3756
    @saurabh3756 16 дней назад +26

    After high court and supreme court he can complain in 'UN security council'😅

    • @IprthmI
      @IprthmI 16 дней назад +1

      😂

    • @Proximacentuey
      @Proximacentuey 16 дней назад

      Yes we will go UN for this💪💪

    • @IprthmI
      @IprthmI 16 дней назад

      @@Proximacentuey 😂

    • @arnabsamantaIFS
      @arnabsamantaIFS 16 дней назад +4

      Allah pass jaiga compain karna.....😅

    • @mohammadbilal9618
      @mohammadbilal9618 15 дней назад

      ​@@arnabsamantaIFStu to illegitimate child ko alimony deta hai

  • @user-tb5je3en8p
    @user-tb5je3en8p 14 дней назад +1

    Just one question if a women cheats or she gave divorce then what is the sections for these?

  • @balajipandya9761
    @balajipandya9761 16 дней назад +6

    All indians equal 🎉
    women protect

    • @karanrawat5915
      @karanrawat5915 16 дней назад +3

      Reality me aao bhai
      Mardo ke halat jyada kharab hai

    • @Moe-Moe121
      @Moe-Moe121 16 дней назад +1

      Nice joke bilkis, asifa case exposed lindus

    • @ChandanMishra-ql1bi
      @ChandanMishra-ql1bi 16 дней назад

      ​ Ignorant converts talking bout hindus, what a joke@@Moe-Moe121

    • @gamingcreatesworlddd2425
      @gamingcreatesworlddd2425 15 дней назад

      ​@karanrawat5915 hmm

    • @gamingrepair1338
      @gamingrepair1338 12 дней назад

      @@karanrawat5915 it is a gender neutral law

  • @Moe-Moe121
    @Moe-Moe121 16 дней назад +7

    New type of beggars alimony😂😂😂.
    Suicide rate of males in divorce is 70-80 % what henies law...

    • @JustMe54328
      @JustMe54328 16 дней назад +1

      Marry working woman with legal income who files Income tax or GST returns every year. Problem solved

  • @noonesd5
    @noonesd5 16 дней назад +1

    As per SC philosophy, Only unemployed wife or divorced wife will get maintenance fee ?

  • @Dilipkumar94-rh5ml
    @Dilipkumar94-rh5ml 16 дней назад +2

    Option:D
    Both A&B

  • @Kiri656
    @Kiri656 16 дней назад +1

    I got one question, till when the man should stop giving alimony to his ex - wife ?? Like even if he is in different relationship now or even if she is in different relationship?? Or is it like till death??

  • @hiimakhil
    @hiimakhil 16 дней назад +12

    Ye hame pata bi ni ta

  • @user-mu9tt9je3c
    @user-mu9tt9je3c 16 дней назад +24

    pahli bar accha kam kiya

  • @pingaldas802
    @pingaldas802 16 дней назад +2

    Great verdict by our ❤Court.

  • @arshadinamdar4034
    @arshadinamdar4034 16 дней назад +6

    🤔Jabtak wo ladki dosri shadi nahi kar leti tabtak dena hoga🤔 😂main bolta hu jabtak wo ladka dosri shadi nhi kar leta tab tak ladki ko bhi ladke ko bhatta dena hoga q k ajkal ladko se ziyada to ladkiyo ko job mil rhi hai har ek sceem ladkiyo k liye a rhi hai sala ladko ka to koi wajood hi nhi raha 😂😂🤔

  • @judiciaryaspirants1218
    @judiciaryaspirants1218 7 дней назад

    Case ka name kya hai?

  • @abhinaymuthyala5424
    @abhinaymuthyala5424 16 дней назад +4

    The question is how a person is not able to pay 20k per month, how he can afford a supreme court lawyer , for whom he would have paid a few lakhs?

    • @achu10mech41
      @achu10mech41 16 дней назад

      He may got support for Religious groups

    • @Ttk00007
      @Ttk00007 16 дней назад

      Kya logic hai

  • @दिव्याSharma
    @दिव्याSharma 16 дней назад +24

    Hn but false cases ke wjh se...kisi bhi nirdosh admio ko na bhugatna pdd jaye ..
    Clarifications should be mentioned.

  • @AmitYadav-tv9fc
    @AmitYadav-tv9fc 16 дней назад

    i think option A is incorrect, Simultaneously, I think the wording of the second option is wrong...What do you think..??

  • @Bittu6555..
    @Bittu6555.. 16 дней назад +21

    Sab allah ki marzi se hota hai😊

  • @rahulnarang2096
    @rahulnarang2096 12 дней назад +1

    sir please reply
    if. a woman is already getting a good salary from its jobs either gov. or private
    then she is eligible for maintenance after divorce?

  • @sssssssssssss654
    @sssssssssssss654 16 дней назад +2

    We Indian are waiting for UCC

  • @criticalthinker5764
    @criticalthinker5764 16 дней назад +1

    This decision shows the importance of diversity . A Christian judge was part of decision .

  • @subodhsingh3589
    @subodhsingh3589 16 дней назад +5

    Wo to supreme Court ko mante hi nahi h.... Wo to aasmani kitab ko maanenge....

    • @missafy7310
      @missafy7310 16 дней назад

      Hn...Mujhe agar milega bhi to mai charity kr dungi😂
      Mai kyu kisi se paise lu jisse mera talluq tut chuka hai

  • @RIO-jp8mp
    @RIO-jp8mp 16 дней назад +4

    Sir.. What about For tribal people....??? Specially Nagaland state...??? As most of time we only follow customary laws which is protected under article 371 A

    • @BhootBhagao-bg7ej
      @BhootBhagao-bg7ej 16 дней назад

      Sc has made alimony fundamental right so tribals will have to follow.
      + Tribals are not a religious group so their personal laws should be defined in Hindu personal laws.

    • @islamkapapa-i7d
      @islamkapapa-i7d 16 дней назад

      St ke liye nhi hota kyuki they have special status

  • @Shri36936
    @Shri36936 16 дней назад +1

    D. Both A & B

  • @BrightFutureSuccess
    @BrightFutureSuccess 16 дней назад

    Thank you so much

  • @109aushiksingh2
    @109aushiksingh2 16 дней назад +3

    women must also made ot owrk u know...........they are not statues

  • @Puzzle_Planet1
    @Puzzle_Planet1 16 дней назад +2

    Supreme court is reviving

  • @NM-mq6xw
    @NM-mq6xw 15 дней назад

    Ans A

  • @katukutuburo
    @katukutuburo 16 дней назад +3

    This will not restrict men to have multiple wives.....Men will be men....

  • @sumeru0728
    @sumeru0728 16 дней назад +3

    जर्मन कोकरोच वीडीयो की स्क्रिप्ट लिख रहा होगा कि दोस्तो अब्दुल का कितना शोषण हो रहा है

  • @P90376
    @P90376 16 дней назад +2

    Chhoti si bat ko lamba karke 10 minute krne ka talent study IQ se better kisi ke pass nhi h😂

  • @sheetalbondwal9453
    @sheetalbondwal9453 16 дней назад +1

    A

  • @zenzokurita
    @zenzokurita 16 дней назад +1

    The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 को १ जुलाई २०२४ से समाप्त कर दिया गया है। उस की जगह भारतीय नागरिक संरक्षण संहिता, २०२३ लागू की है। CrPC के १२५ धारा में जो प्रावधान था, वह प्रावधान नये कानून में किसी धारा में है। अगर यह किसी को ज्ञात है, तो जानकारी दें।

    • @zenzokurita
      @zenzokurita 16 дней назад

      @@purely.logical
      सर, CrPC की जगह १ जुलाई २०२४ से भारतीय नागरिक संरक्षण संहिता लागू हुई है। CrPC की १२५ वी धारा में गुजारा भत्ता का प्रावधान है। वह गुजारा भत्ता का प्रावधान भारतीय नागरिक संरक्षण संहिता के किस धारा में है? यह मेरा प्रश्न है।

  • @shaheennawaz5390
    @shaheennawaz5390 16 дней назад +1

    thanks to supreme court of India.. Jai Sam vidhan..

  • @UmakantMishra
    @UmakantMishra 15 дней назад

    Well explained ❤❤❤

  • @RONIT848
    @RONIT848 16 дней назад +1

    IF WOMAN CONNECTED EMOTIONALLY TO HUSBAND , MAN ALSO CONNECTED EMOTIONALLY
    SO WHY ASK FOR ALIMONY,
    HE WAS PAYING WHEN MARRIAGE WORKING ,
    NO MARRIAGE = NO ALIMONY

  • @Connect.with_me
    @Connect.with_me 16 дней назад +34

    Hyy Hallah 😢😢😢
    Chuslam khatre me 😢

  • @PrakritySharma_sriradhe
    @PrakritySharma_sriradhe 14 дней назад +1

    Good 👍

  • @virusahani8070
    @virusahani8070 16 дней назад +5

    बहुत ही सराहनीय फैसला है ❤❤

  • @AskTrendy
    @AskTrendy 16 дней назад +1

    Agr aurat dusri shaadi krle fir kahe ka bhatta ye rong h

  • @fareedkhanikor1835
    @fareedkhanikor1835 16 дней назад +2

    Good decision ❤

  • @hackerrank9173
    @hackerrank9173 16 дней назад

    Needed this 75 years ago...

  • @user-qr3mk5lu2d
    @user-qr3mk5lu2d 16 дней назад +59

    We want population control bill

    • @khabirulislam999
      @khabirulislam999 16 дней назад +8

      Ha tumhare tarah na mard baan jao

    • @Kharvela.-
      @Kharvela.- 16 дней назад

      ​@@khabirulislam999pakistan chala ja pakistani

    • @sahilsarang6945
      @sahilsarang6945 16 дней назад +10

      ​@@khabirulislam999Nhi ab ek bacche pr 1 crore ki panelty lagani chaiye baccha Paida kia to 1 cr tax bharo 😂

    • @_cosmic_aurora_gameofcones
      @_cosmic_aurora_gameofcones 16 дней назад +1

      ​@@sahilsarang6945😂😂😂😂😂😂

    • @beunique6100
      @beunique6100 16 дней назад

      5/6 bacche ek sath payda karne ko mard nhi bewakoof kehte hai​@@khabirulislam999

  • @pawanbishnoi5601
    @pawanbishnoi5601 16 дней назад

    Is vice versa true?

  • @mitchimir5973
    @mitchimir5973 15 дней назад

    Is it applicable on devorced working women as well

  • @akhilkashyap2521
    @akhilkashyap2521 16 дней назад +1

    Any momina here share your thought

  • @WeKnowIslam94
    @WeKnowIslam94 16 дней назад +1

    UCC is much needed

  • @RakshitChintu-sl4sj
    @RakshitChintu-sl4sj 16 дней назад

    Option A

  • @hmmmm587
    @hmmmm587 16 дней назад +2

    Sad day for leftwing

  • @blinkingeye932
    @blinkingeye932 14 дней назад +1

    Bravo

  • @Amareeka
    @Amareeka 16 дней назад

    Why not under CrPC ? It shall prevail. Its more stricter, which is even the general principle of law/court.

  • @krish3322
    @krish3322 12 дней назад

    But what about independent women

  • @priyasingh-ht4uo
    @priyasingh-ht4uo 15 дней назад

    sir citation ?

  • @monalika_bhadauriya
    @monalika_bhadauriya 16 дней назад +1

    Pichhe chhorne ke baad v pichhe nhi chhor paya.....😅 8:21

  • @jackbm2864
    @jackbm2864 16 дней назад

    Why?

  • @KalyanKariniPandey
    @KalyanKariniPandey 16 дней назад

    NOpe New tchnlgies may not endanger these FR, Thanks sir

  • @abhishekkumarsingh1318
    @abhishekkumarsingh1318 16 дней назад +1

    Sir ji, ek baat bataiye , kya agar female khud hi divorce maangti hai jabarjasti , toh kya tab bhi male ko apani x_wife ko alimony dena parega. Sabhi religion me 🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔

  • @PushpaSingh-cr7ls
    @PushpaSingh-cr7ls 15 дней назад

    Answer AAAA

  • @devvikramsingh7785
    @devvikramsingh7785 16 дней назад +3

    Alimony nahi milni chahiye