Your analysis of Coriolis meters as as densitometers is very poorly written. The principle of operation of measuring density is based on changes of tube frequency and has nothing to do with the Coriolis principle which measures the flow. Coriolis meters are used primarily to measure full stream flow, density and temperature and only by exception to measure slip streams. It is very common to measure the density of flow streams with solids and they don't have to be homogeneous. Last, your comments about tube wall thickness being a liability and will eventually lead to tube failure is completely misinformed. When properly sized, Coriolis meters have a long history and reputation of reliability measuring flow streams that contain abrasive solids of all types. In fact, have onboard diagnostics that can detect even the small changes to tube rigidity caused by either erosion, corrosion or coating.
Your analysis of Coriolis meters as as densitometers is very poorly written. The principle of operation of measuring density is based on changes of tube frequency and has nothing to do with the Coriolis principle which measures the flow. Coriolis meters are used primarily to measure full stream flow, density and temperature and only by exception to measure slip streams. It is very common to measure the density of flow streams with solids and they don't have to be homogeneous. Last, your comments about tube wall thickness being a liability and will eventually lead to tube failure is completely misinformed. When properly sized, Coriolis meters have a long history and reputation of reliability measuring flow streams that contain abrasive solids of all types. In fact, have onboard diagnostics that can detect even the small changes to tube rigidity caused by either erosion, corrosion or coating.
Thanks for general observation by me. Will explore more later! :)