For those who are confused because the effect aren't in, this is what happened; Right before you hear everyone shout "grenade!", the soldier pulls the pin of the grenade and sticks it out of the tank. When you hear a pop right before he starts screaming, the grenade is supposed to go off and blow his hand off. When you see him struggle out of the tank with one of his arms close to his body, that is the arm that for blown off and they were gonna edit it to make it look like a stump.
@@AwsibThapa This isn't just unedited. It's actually a rehearsal scene. What makes this clearly a rehearsal scene is the fact that you can actually see a staff member at 2:10 standing behind the Lucy Sue.
thats not the point.. no one wanted to go of course, this is war and fucking scary! But they did go to protect freedom and their country. This one didn't realize that if everyone don,t go to fight, he would have died anyway (or lose his freedom).
yup, the combination of the lack of experience and fear of combat detered him so much he couldn't even put on a fucking hat, being 1945 means the majority of the germans in this movie are like him, never seen combat and scared to death which is why alot of the time they couldn't hit the broadside of a barn
I would have kept the scene. Shows how afraid some of these tankers were. You think it would be cool riding around in a tank behind all that armor and a big ass gun, but what a lot of people don't realize is they are just tracked coffins rolling around the battlefield. This man blowing off his own arm just to get out of duty is a great depiction of that raw fear.
I can get that. I am lucky to have never been in combat but I have had that thought in war games. One side of my brain says get behind the tank, it’s a moving wall of cover, but then the other half of my brain says it’s not cover it’s a target for everyone with explosives and aoe weapons.
No. Tank casualties were actually not that high - compared to the infantry .... IRL - some of the crew from those knocked out Sherman's probably would have been all right. The movie just killed them all because dealing with the survivors would have been a plot complication. One of the things about this movie that is pure bull shit is the Sargent saying he's going to stay with the tank because it's his home. That's just stupid. A lot of these guys went through multiple tanks. They'd keep the crew together if they could since they knew how to work with each other - but - they'd get a new tank - or an old one that had been patched up. .
Infantry had higher casualty rates than tank crews. The entire " ShERmANs wERE a DeAtH TraP" is bullshit created by a few poorly written books with zero research ( Prime Example Beltran Coopers Book " ) and Nazo fan boy rhetoric.
@@joeschmoe9154 Yes and no. *Belton* Cooper's book is an excellent memoir of his experiences during WWII. The book was Ghost Written and I'm not sure who came up with the title. Thus - it is a popularized book of one persons experiences and attitudes. One thing to keep in mind here - is that Cooper's Job - was to evaluate disabled tanks for repair or replacement. During this examination - the bodies and body parts of the crews were still in the tanks. Cooper makes a point - that as the Officer in Charge of Repair and Replacement for the 3rd Armored Division, given it's record - he probably saw more disabled Sherman Tanks than any other person. Thus - he may well have seen more dead tank crewman than any other person alive. Maybe there are others who've seen more - but if so - they've all seen a lot of dead tankers. Now - when I was in the military - and Nick Moran has made the same point - the other people I served with really didn't know that much about anything other than what they needed to know to do their jobs. It was History Nerds like me - that were interested enough to learn these other things. My buddies were mostly interested in getting drunk, getting laid and getting out. The real mistake here - is made by people using a Memoir as a Historical or Technical Reference. All of them have value - they're just good for other things. Memoirs which talk about how the food tasted and how cold their feet got - give the reader an idea of what it was like to be one of the people participating in these events. Histories give them a (hopefully) objective view of what happened and Technical References describe how the equipment worked. Each is valuable for it's own sake but should not be confused as a source for what the others provide. .
@@BobSmith-dk8nw Cooper never saw Combat Having him opine about the effectiveness of Shermans is like having someone from Graves Registration critique Infantry Tactics.
They should have kept a scene like this. My grandpa was a medic in the Korean war and saw only one battle on a hill. He got a purple heart and a silver star that day. He said there was alot of guys who shot their foot and he didn't blame them. He said he wanted to do the same but he was too scared to shoot his foot.
It depends. If he was a volunteer who eagarly enlisted and volunteered for the tank corps who then suddenly got cold feet then you're right. OTOH if he was a draftee forced into the army and forced into that tank that means he didn't want to be there to begin with and he didn't owe any allegiance to anyone else in that platoon. The latter is almost certainly the case since his sergeant had so little respect for him to begin with. There was even worse bonding on that team than on the Fury team.
oh goodOldave..we are all born we all die, what happens in between my brother..matters little, only we should die with honour, and our brothers around us...
Which is kind of stupid. You see 4 Shermans get destroyed in the movie, 3 by an 88 and 1 from a panzerfoust. In the actual war, when a sherman was destroyed, on average only 1 of 5 men inside died. In fact more Sherman crewmen died outside of their tanks than inside, and overall more of the actual tanks were destroyed than crewmen killed. Yet in the movie we see 4 entire crews instantly killed from one hit to the tank. I guess that adds more suspense than having the last tank carrying a half dozen extra men sitting on top with another half dozen walking behind it by the time it gets to the crossroads.
Soldier: Grenade!!!! *GRENADE BLOWS UP* Soldier: He blew his hand off....... *Soldiers go back to work after seeing an attempted suicide like nothing happened*
My brother was a tank driver in an M1 in the '80's. He said the officers called the M1 a "Main Battle Tank", but the non-coms and regulars labeled it "Main Battle Target".
@@calito44 Yeah, it might've looked invincible, but so did most generations of tanks when first unleashed on the world. Believe me, it can be killed - my brother was taught the many ways his M1 could get whacked - and that's why their training involved mitigating placing the tank in a vulnerable position without substantial support elements (both infantry, artillery and airborne). Furthermore, the M1 has never gone up against an enemy with even close to comparable lethality. Killing Iraqi, Soviet-era cast offs and T-54s in Afghanistan are not an issue for it. Had it gone up against Soviet front-line units or even Chinese PLA divisions, the M1 would not have left unscathed.
Tankers in the early 80s were still operating under the assumption that their tank was finished the moment it got hit as for most of the Cold War, the steel hulls of tanks like the M48 and M60 were hilariously inadequate against modern HEAT or APFSDS rounds so its not surprising the older NCOs were sceptical. The composite Chobham armour of the M1 however was a quantum leap in protection and combined with new innovations like armoured bulkheads and blow out panels meant that for the first time in decades a US tanker could go into his vehicle knowing that he had a decent chance of making it out if hit. Meanwhile poor Russian tankers are still literally sitting on top of their ammunition.
@@fludblud Yeah, that video in Syria of a T-72 getting whacked by an AT missile shows just what a deathtrap Russian tanks can be when hit low down in the hull. The majority of their ammo is stored there. This was a conscious decision made by those who designed the T-72 (and other Russian tanks) in an effort to keep the height profile of the tank as low/small as possible. The Cold-War era logic being that the smaller the tank was, the harder it would be to hit. This is true to a point, but with modern laser range finding and targeting computers increasing first-hit probability - even on very small targets - it ends up being almost a certainty that any T-72 hit low will quickly immolate its unfortunate crew.
What I love the most about this scene is the coordination of all the soldiers (except those derps next to the time traveler). Those in the immediate vicinity and heard the grenade call ducked immediately. The ones further away react after the explosion.
Hadn't seen that one. One thing I just figured out - was the guy who blew his hand off - yelled "Grenade!" to warn everyone - then held his hand up above the tank with the grenade in it (so it wouldn't fucking kill him). We didn't see the grenade explode - because this scene didn't make it to special effects where they would have put that part in. Thus, when the guy climbs back down from the tank - he has both hands - because they never finished working on the scene. First time through I didn't pick up on that and I'm like "Blew his hand off? He had both hands ..." .
What I thought happened was Someone yelled grenade that made the Person have a breakdown due to PTSD. When the Lt. asked what happened, The Tank Commander sarcastically said that he blew his hand off. Any ways, Thanks for the explaination
Check out the dinner table scene. Wardaddy is reading the newspaper, as relaxed as he’s ever gonna be, and the hand is still trembling. The tension never leaves.
This touched a nerve for me, was recon and seen some really tough men, was in some of the modern peace keeping missions, one day this corporal I looked up to just broke down, his daughter was born 2 months ago, he had near misses in war zones, he was in my unit for an un sponsored mission. One day he just couldn’t leave the bed on a regular recon patrol, it was definitely ptsd.
@@МихаилПетренко-ч2в sorry I don’t speak Russian, what you said is correct, physical wounds are much easier to heal, he was afraid of not seeing his daughter and wife which caused a mental breakdown, every patrol he went on he was not afraid of his life because the whole platoon will sacrifice our lives for each other, he was afraid of not coming back and making his wife a widow and his daughter an orphan, which slowly ate into his mind. Me being much younger than him do understand his pain because I married young and have 2 kids already but to put in his perspective I don’t want my wife to be a widow and my 2 kids to orphans
You're right... they would, BUT... with EVERY SINGLE MOVIE THERE ARE PEOPLE LIKE YOU... wanting ALL these clips to be added to a movie. The EDITORS are LIMITED to the TIME they can make a movie. If you had ANY IDEA how many scenes are left on the floor... you'd crap. And each movie would be 8 hours long. So stop asking for you hand held through a movie because you can't make the logical jump from one scene to the next without every little single detail being explained/shown. It can't happen. Ever. Never will. Deal with it.
@@user-lq4wk5ub1k Dude wtf. He's not talking about adding a scene that explains if the ending of Inception is real or if its a dream he's talking about deleted scenes that simply add weight to the movie and make it feel more complete. Scenes that make the characters real, give them more emotion, and backstory. I story that is built around the personal bonds and relationships of a small group of soldiers is depleted when you remove literally everything personal about them. The theatrical version of this movie was easily passable as a B- movie but if you added at least 20 minutes or so back in, this would easily rival Saving Private Ryan and the other greats
@@231mac I can't tell who this comment is directed towards but in my opinion I think this scene still would've been interesting to see in the final cut. At least the first part, maybe cut out the bit with the guy blowing his hand off. But it helps with making Norman more terrified, shows how some soldiers are breaking down after fighting for so long. That kinda good stuff is always welcome in these movies.
Shouldn't have been deleted. Good backstory, showed the LT in a bit more believable level of WW2 Era competence while still showing his inexperience, and showed the horror that those men went through was so great they were taking drastic measures when they broke. Shortened up a little maybe but kept in, this would have been an eye opener for the terror Norman was expecting to find.
Half a century ago I worked with an NCO who had served in Europe. He told me of an occasion when his unit was situated across a valley from the Germans. They sat there for several days knowing that the enemy was dug in and prepared. Finally, when the order to attack came through, one soldier shot himself in the foot. Unfortunately, he was carrying an M-3 submachine gun and blew off most of his foot. Oh, and when they made the attack, the Germans had already retreated from their position.
Wth not sure if to laugh or cry, I’ve served with many nations for un in the 2000s but we never tried to hurt ourselves. Getting shot hurts a lot and can die but the rounds we are issued with can cause you to bleed out, it’s definitely ptsd
@@ActinOnOrder I understand what you mean, right now we are more about trigger safety, the number of miss fire and non good barrel control is pretty insane. Can write a book on miss fire stories, was an nco, would scream at them for the lack of safety, now my voice horse😭
Some russians conscripts are shooting to their foot , sabotaging their own equipment , trying to avoid fighting the ukranians in the Eastern Ukraine Theater. Hell yeah, even some boys are asking their friends to break their arms to avoid Putler " General mobilization " .
I'm now convinced we need a re-cut of "Fury." It's a character-study of a close-knit crew in mortal danger, not classic hollywood, and it got turned into standard fare in the editing room, I'm sure of it
Love the way the commanders treat the Lieutenant. He's an officer but obviously hasn't seen or done shit compared to the enlisted guys. Showcases quite an accurate portrayal of chain of command. And how sometimes it's not as clear cut as it is on paper.
When I first joined my squadron in VietNam I was a very green Ensign right out of flight school. We had an E-6 flight engineer on my crew who treated me like shit. He’d pour coffee in my helmet bag, trash my hat etc. Looking back, I wish I’d invited him behind the hangar and settled it physically. Win or lose, he may have had some respect…who knows. I know I certainly would have felt better, instead of just enduring it. I think by the end of that first tour he may have had some respect, I don’t know, but the shit stopped after a few months.
My grand father was the gunner in a Sherman for the Canadians armored division in ww2. I always remembered when he told me they had to find a new driver almost every other day. He told me it was common, they would freeze/panic/couldn't handle the stress.
Not a priest, chaplain, or a pimp. He's a crew member. If you notice when they yell "grenade" he didn't even flinch which means he's just a crew member
I remember watching fury for the first time. I was maybe 14 and shook to the bone. At the end of the movie i cried. Not because ist was so sad but because ist was so overwhelming
@@blackice4649 it may have a lot of inconsistencies and historical inaccuracies when it comes to the battle scenes, but the way they explored how a tank crew at the time operate and their relationships is pretty fantastic
I met a gentleman who was part of a tank crew in WWII. I was a teen in the 80's when I met him, and this gentleman (Harold) was a regular camper at a state campground my family regularly attended. I got to know him over a few summers of my teen years playing horseshoes and penny poker with him. We knew he was a WWII vet, he didn't speak a lot about it, the only story we got was how he was wounded when (my memory is hazy here) I believe he said fragments of some round (can't remember if it was a grenade or shrapnel from shell) entered the compartment. Harold and another guy were seriously hurt, and another member of the crew was superficially injured. The guy who was superficially injured thought that Harold and the other crew member were dead, and broke down emotionally. I remember Harold saying the incident completely broke the superficially injured guy...I can't remember all the details, but he said that this fella was as tough and seasoned as anyone serving, and I think had even been wounded before, but this incident wrecked him emotionally and ultimately he ended up discharged. I just remember him sadly saying "it messed us all up good". I was too young to realize I was talking to history. I wish I could say I got to spend hours listening to his stories, but alas that is the only one I have. I fondly remember the 4-5 times a summer from 1985-1989 that I spent throwing horse shoes with him and his brother during the day, and sitting around the fire or playing cards around an old Coleman lantern with him and my dad at night. I was always excited to see he was in the park camping too when we were there. I think back how kind him and his brother were to let me join them throwing shoes. Hanging with the greatest generation - I just didn't realize it at the time, but I do now and will remember him and everyone who has served fondly.
I'm proud to say my uncle was a tank commander during Operation Tourch in North Africa. He earned the Silver Star by confusing the Germans and French Vichey in front of them by backing their tanks from the top of a hill and moving sideways along the back and moving back to the top to take more shots. He was with four or five tanks. They fooled the Germans into believing there were many more tanks than just a few. They were successful in holding back the enemy long enough to allow the soldiers behind them to reinforce themselves. My uncle fought under General Patton. The weird thing is that he never mentioned it as I was growing up. I only heard of this story from my family after he died of old age.
exactly, this scene is bs and shouting "look Americans war is really brutal", Definitely an idea of somebody that never spent much time with veterans, true accounts, and never served for himself in the forces
Well judging by him saying "I can't go back out there", he definetly has fought, several times even, but the stuff he saw really just pushed him to his limit And I shit you not, no one should ever underestimate the horrors you could see in war, no matter how tough you think you are
Another reason this was cut that I don't think anyone picked up on yet, look behind Wardaddy at 2:10 there's just a production crew member chilling in a black t shirt with a headset on for almost 20 seconds of the scene :D
Being a tanker was hard and scary. At anymoment a he or ap round would come tearing its way thru your combat vehicle. And the cramped spaces would drive you crazy. Its not an easy job.
Tankers had a whole manner of ways they could die, none pleasant: tank shell blowing you to pieces, smoke choking you out, burned alive, catching shrapnel, things were meant to be rolling shields but against the forces they were they were rolling death boxes
Those who are whinning about the young LT's character probably don't have the understanding about the military leadership building process of officers. He respected his more experienced NCO associates by not bragging too much and by this process he would gain experience and be a part of the grooming process to be a General to lead and plan the various commands and even Army. Lee, Pershing, McArther, Patton or the latest Petraeus or Mattis and all other rose through the rank this process.
The job of an experienced NCO is not only to lead his squad or platoon in battle, it is to teach young company-grade officers the ropes so that they can function effectively in combat themselves. Some senior officers will not allow an inexperienced younger officer to function independently until the officer in question passes muster with a seasoned, experienced sergeant or other NCO. Of course, due to attrition of junior officers in combat, experienced sergeants are often given battlefield commissions - and promoted on the spot. That's how First Sergeant Carwood Lipton, Easy Co., 506th PIR, 101st AB, became a second lieutenant - to name an example that many people will know. Lipton's superior performance during the Battle of the Bulge caught the eye of his superiors and that was that.
I wish that was in the movie, that would help to explain Norm's hesitations so much... This is one of the best WW2 movies ever, next to Das Boot. Amazing.
funny story, that guy was actually fired for fucking this scene up, it was deemed more cost than it was worth to edit him out as well as the arm. that's the reason they deleted this scene. he was supposed to be working a support role on scene, but was actually in a phone call when they started filming ( you can see the headset in his right ear) and was supposed to be on the other side of the tank so he would be not in the shot, though originally it was going to be shot from the other angle and he would have stood there. was rumored to be an alcoholic and was probably drunk right here lol.
I was so confused until i realized that this was before they added the effects in post. Its actually really cool seeing them have to act around having no effects or ques. Really interesting
"I just don't feel safe, sir. I mean, that one tank has Brad Pitt, Jon Bernthal, Shia LeBouf, that guy from End of Watch and that kid from Percy Jackson's movies. We're extras at best."
Eh ... not really. They could have come up with someone that quick if there were crews around from disabled tanks - but it was pretty common for them to be running short. That was the thing about a crew of 5 - you would often at least have 4.
I like this movie. I don't usually watch movies more than once but I've seen this one several times. It's got a good pace to it, nice realism, and it's not the average Hollywood hero movie where bullets bounce off the hero and the enemy dies dramatically for our entertainment.
When your individual mental health was less important than getting the job done, and everyone's mental health is important, except when the job that needs to be done is more important than your individual mental health. This movie needs an all cut scenes director's version.
Colonel David Hackworth (1930 - 2005) wrote about grunts doing this during the Korean War: During the initial American retreat from North Korea, the infantry were retreating across the country on foot in the approaching winter weather without any winter gear. Soldiers started injuring themselves so they could get airlifted out of the freezing cold. Stick your hand up out of your foxhole during a firefight, or set off a grenade in it with only your leg dangling in ; you can injure a limb bad enough that you get sent off the frontlines. He almost did it as a young soldier to get away from the cold, but ended up taking all night to dig the perfect hole and called it off when the sun came up.
Fury, starring Brad Pitt, and Saving private ryan, starring Tom Hanks are some of the best WWII European action movies I've ever seen. For example, the movie Fury is a tank war movie that is more fun to look at. Doesn't glorify American soldiers too much like Soviet (Russian) T-34 tank war movies😅😅😅😅
If the scene ended before the "grenade!" part, I think it would have been welcome. It kinda shows that the crew of the Fury isn't as hard as it could be and shows that Norman had it lucky being under Wardaddy's command. It's a little too convenient though that the other new guy happens to be an assistant driver as well.
You can say whatever you want, but I enjoy watching casual scene like this. Not every war movies have to be about shooting and blowing shit up at every moments.
since it's a deleted scene and unedited, i think when he pulled the pin off the grenade, i think his arm was supposed to be blown off because he didnt move his arm at all
I feel like that was a lost moment in the film. Parker could have used the line "no, I haven't. Now shut up and follow my orders" while staring him down. I think it would have added a bit more character to the LT, who otherwise was just a red shirt
Binkowski was a good character. Sucks that he was killed in the beginning of the tiger fight scene in the back of the tank formation. You don't even really see him die. just his tank explode.
Here’s a little detail that I missed the first time I watched this, Wardaddy calls “Bog” on the radio which is the correct WWII term for the Bow Gunner, Norman’s position. Nice little bit of dialogue that they included
I would say that the movie "Fury" as a whole with the exception of the ending seems pretty realistic for a WWII flick. As a FMF combat Vet we work with Tankers occasionally and they were an interesting group. But I Core RVN was not Europe and the nature and conduct of their war was a lot different. Complicated in a different way. Especially the weather.
Would have made a gruesome scene, I love how they made the new guy clean his own station and he finds the previous guy's face just sitting on something. War is not for those who like to eat I suppose.
2:17 "Are we good?" Meanwhile dude's just screaming bloody murder XD Also 2:57 The way he just deadpans "He blew his hand off" I just can't get over it
Just want to point out that the replacement bow gunner for the “Lucy Sue” was there with his thumb up his rear the whole time... what’s the point of dragging Norman in to replace “Fury”s gunner?
Wow! More than 4 million views already?! Thanks!
Did you just check the views after 3 years ?
Yellow Spongebob as you can see yep
You deserved it
@@shortscene8477 😂😂😂
@@shortscene8477 that's what i call A Good Qustion
It's so weird to see without any audio/visual effects, but the guys acting was amazing.
I’ve never seen this film and I didn’t even notice this clip is unedited. Looks great even as it is!
@@Pataganja There's no punching sound for example
It was a dummy grenade because he didn't want to go so he took one
Or maybe the sound was isolated inside the tank
@@m4ch207 your a beetard
For those who are confused because the effect aren't in, this is what happened;
Right before you hear everyone shout "grenade!", the soldier pulls the pin of the grenade and sticks it out of the tank. When you hear a pop right before he starts screaming, the grenade is supposed to go off and blow his hand off. When you see him struggle out of the tank with one of his arms close to his body, that is the arm that for blown off and they were gonna edit it to make it look like a stump.
I'm guessing he threw the grenade himself to get out of fighting ?
Yup. That's what he was doing.
Thanks, I was thinking to myself.. This guy should she shot for cowardice!
Bastard should have shot himself in the leg. Much less painful I guess.
Blacksherman20 I would imagine.
At first i thought that someone just randomly screamed "Grenade!" as a joke and he just lost his sh*t and got out of the tank screaming in panic XD
Yeah, i needed to rewind as well after reading the comments when i understood that this is the unedited version of the scene
Same here
@@mariooss thanks, 'unedited' I understand now.
@@AwsibThapa This isn't just unedited. It's actually a rehearsal scene. What makes this clearly a rehearsal scene is the fact that you can actually see a staff member at 2:10 standing behind the Lucy Sue.
@@SergeantExtremeoh yeah there is. Took me 5 minutes to get that person :D . Thanks
I feel bad for that guy. That was solid acting and they cut it out.
fo real, his role is a crybaby deserter and probably spend hours practicing that particular scream and they cut it out
Double fucking insults lol
@@BioSoundTrack I wouldnt call him a "crybaby" he seemed pretty young and ptsd effects people in different ways. you think you couldve done better
@@BioSoundTrack Hey man. I wanna see you on frontline. Go to war and then call somebody crababy...dumbass...
@@martinhromocuk8631 um, im pretty sure he was talking about the scene getting cut not calling someone a crybaby during war xD
@@CreativeName457 he wasn’t, he as agreeing with OP
02:16 I love the way how tank crews of the Sherman in the far left are poking their heads out from the same commander cupola, it is so adorable xD
Like 'Whack a Mole!' at the fairgrounds.
cute :D
Lol I blushed at that, we did that in a Sherman at a ww2 festival
There's no cupola on that tank, a cupola is a small turret on a larger turret usually housing a machine gun. See M60 MBT to see what a cupola is.
@@antcri730 sherman have cupola look on the tank on right, commander entrance is bigger and higher with visors
considering that whole tank crew was killed afterwards, it wasnt even that stupid move
Juzo juzo the whole crew wasn't killed the kid survived
the guy who blowed his hand off was part of crew that had no survivors
Yeah, I guess he just got lucky
yeah but i assume he was right handed, so he should really have blown of his left
thats not the point.. no one wanted to go of course, this is war and fucking scary! But they did go to protect freedom and their country. This one didn't realize that if everyone don,t go to fight, he would have died anyway (or lose his freedom).
Definitely should've left this scene in, would've given a little bit more of a backstory for one of the other crews.
It's just too silly and over the top though.
naaa killed would have killed the flow
I think it's way over the top and would just over saturate
Inside the tank? that bullet would have bounced back into his face.
He thought he would die if he went into battle so he blew his hand off so he could go home.
Look at the Lieutenant at exactly 0:56 can't even put his cap on lollllll
+Rabble Chang Boy It's my favorite moment! I want to push my fist up to the belly of the innocent lieutenant.(^q^)
Looks like an intentional fail, to reinforce the idea that he is horribly inexperienced.
yup, the combination of the lack of experience and fear of combat detered him so much he couldn't even put on a fucking hat, being 1945 means the majority of the germans in this movie are like him, never seen combat and scared to death which is why alot of the time they couldn't hit the broadside of a barn
That's why he dies later in the movie.
TIN CHING Leung aaaaaahhahhahaahaha really,you got excellent attention.
I would have kept the scene. Shows how afraid some of these tankers were. You think it would be cool riding around in a tank behind all that armor and a big ass gun, but what a lot of people don't realize is they are just tracked coffins rolling around the battlefield. This man blowing off his own arm just to get out of duty is a great depiction of that raw fear.
I can get that. I am lucky to have never been in combat but I have had that thought in war games. One side of my brain says get behind the tank, it’s a moving wall of cover, but then the other half of my brain says it’s not cover it’s a target for everyone with explosives and aoe weapons.
No. Tank casualties were actually not that high - compared to the infantry ....
IRL - some of the crew from those knocked out Sherman's probably would have been all right. The movie just killed them all because dealing with the survivors would have been a plot complication.
One of the things about this movie that is pure bull shit is the Sargent saying he's going to stay with the tank because it's his home. That's just stupid.
A lot of these guys went through multiple tanks. They'd keep the crew together if they could since they knew how to work with each other - but - they'd get a new tank - or an old one that had been patched up.
.
Infantry had higher casualty rates than tank crews. The entire " ShERmANs wERE a DeAtH TraP" is bullshit created by a few poorly written books with zero research ( Prime Example Beltran Coopers Book " ) and Nazo fan boy rhetoric.
@@joeschmoe9154 Yes and no.
*Belton* Cooper's book is an excellent memoir of his experiences during WWII. The book was Ghost Written and I'm not sure who came up with the title.
Thus - it is a popularized book of one persons experiences and attitudes.
One thing to keep in mind here - is that Cooper's Job - was to evaluate disabled tanks for repair or replacement. During this examination - the bodies and body parts of the crews were still in the tanks.
Cooper makes a point - that as the Officer in Charge of Repair and Replacement for the 3rd Armored Division, given it's record - he probably saw more disabled Sherman Tanks than any other person. Thus - he may well have seen more dead tank crewman than any other person alive. Maybe there are others who've seen more - but if so - they've all seen a lot of dead tankers.
Now - when I was in the military - and Nick Moran has made the same point - the other people I served with really didn't know that much about anything other than what they needed to know to do their jobs. It was History Nerds like me - that were interested enough to learn these other things. My buddies were mostly interested in getting drunk, getting laid and getting out.
The real mistake here - is made by people using a Memoir as a Historical or Technical Reference. All of them have value - they're just good for other things. Memoirs which talk about how the food tasted and how cold their feet got - give the reader an idea of what it was like to be one of the people participating in these events. Histories give them a (hopefully) objective view of what happened and Technical References describe how the equipment worked. Each is valuable for it's own sake but should not be confused as a source for what the others provide.
.
@@BobSmith-dk8nw Cooper never saw Combat Having him opine about the effectiveness of Shermans is like having someone from Graves Registration critique Infantry Tactics.
They should have kept a scene like this. My grandpa was a medic in the Korean war and saw only one battle on a hill. He got a purple heart and a silver star that day. He said there was alot of guys who shot their foot and he didn't blame them. He said he wanted to do the same but he was too scared to shoot his foot.
Wow
That's fucking bravery. Shooting your own foot.
@@seanriopel3132 would've gotten you kick out of the infirmary by patton himself if you did it tho
@@akriegguardsman you got do it at the right time when your under fire.
Why did they shoot their foot?
Ironic that blowing his hand off was the smart move. Everyone else in the tank platoon wound up getting killed by panzerfausts, Tigers or SS columns.
It depends. If he was a volunteer who eagarly enlisted and volunteered for the tank corps who then suddenly got cold feet then you're right. OTOH if he was a draftee forced into the army and forced into that tank that means he didn't want to be there to begin with and he didn't owe any allegiance to anyone else in that platoon. The latter is almost certainly the case since his sergeant had so little respect for him to begin with. There was even worse bonding on that team than on the Fury team.
Thats fucking easy for you to say
injuring yourself to get out of the front lines has gotten soldiers executed. not that smart of a move.
oh goodOldave..we are all born we all die, what happens in between my brother..matters little, only we should die with honour, and our brothers around us...
Which is kind of stupid. You see 4 Shermans get destroyed in the movie, 3 by an 88 and 1 from a panzerfoust. In the actual war, when a sherman was destroyed, on average only 1 of 5 men inside died. In fact more Sherman crewmen died outside of their tanks than inside, and overall more of the actual tanks were destroyed than crewmen killed. Yet in the movie we see 4 entire crews instantly killed from one hit to the tank. I guess that adds more suspense than having the last tank carrying a half dozen extra men sitting on top with another half dozen walking behind it by the time it gets to the crossroads.
0:56 omg i cant be the only one to see him fail at putting his hat on xD
XD
I think its called character conflict, its taught in acting school to make your performance look more natural.
Now that you said it I can't stop looking at it lol
Hans Grab my Luger Lol!
hahaha :D
Soldier: Grenade!!!!
*GRENADE BLOWS UP*
Soldier: He blew his hand off.......
*Soldiers go back to work after seeing an attempted suicide like nothing happened*
Lol, you took so much time formatting your dialogue but couldn't spell grenade correctly. XD
Me:*Sees comment*
EVERYTHING I KNOW IS A LIE!!!!!!!
Yeah dude we all saw the video thanks
yea seeing a grenade explode isnt that crazy for a bunch of wwii soldiers... they couldnt give less of a shit as long as they avoided shrapnel
Parker: Sergeant Davis! Explanation? Davis: He blew his hand off. *Parker looks around* Wardaddy: I got one for ya! 60 Words A Minute!
My brother was a tank driver in an M1 in the '80's. He said the officers called the M1 a "Main Battle Tank", but the non-coms and regulars labeled it "Main Battle Target".
Ohh really? the M1 looked invincible and all mighty tank.
@@calito44 Yeah, it might've looked invincible, but so did most generations of tanks when first unleashed on the world. Believe me, it can be killed - my brother was taught the many ways his M1 could get whacked - and that's why their training involved mitigating placing the tank in a vulnerable position without substantial support elements (both infantry, artillery and airborne). Furthermore, the M1 has never gone up against an enemy with even close to comparable lethality. Killing Iraqi, Soviet-era cast offs and T-54s in Afghanistan are not an issue for it. Had it gone up against Soviet front-line units or even Chinese PLA divisions, the M1 would not have left unscathed.
Tankers in the early 80s were still operating under the assumption that their tank was finished the moment it got hit as for most of the Cold War, the steel hulls of tanks like the M48 and M60 were hilariously inadequate against modern HEAT or APFSDS rounds so its not surprising the older NCOs were sceptical. The composite Chobham armour of the M1 however was a quantum leap in protection and combined with new innovations like armoured bulkheads and blow out panels meant that for the first time in decades a US tanker could go into his vehicle knowing that he had a decent chance of making it out if hit.
Meanwhile poor Russian tankers are still literally sitting on top of their ammunition.
@@fludblud Yeah, that video in Syria of a T-72 getting whacked by an AT missile shows just what a deathtrap Russian tanks can be when hit low down in the hull. The majority of their ammo is stored there. This was a conscious decision made by those who designed the T-72 (and other Russian tanks) in an effort to keep the height profile of the tank as low/small as possible. The Cold-War era logic being that the smaller the tank was, the harder it would be to hit. This is true to a point, but with modern laser range finding and targeting computers increasing first-hit probability - even on very small targets - it ends up being almost a certainty that any T-72 hit low will quickly immolate its unfortunate crew.
The Lieutenant definitely earned their respect in death. Leading all the tanks, burning to death, and offing himself. He really didn't hesitate.
His rank is MasterSgt
@@frost3193 no
He was talking about Lt. Parker
@@frost3193 His rank is Second Lieutenant
Took me a minute to realize that this entire scene hadn't gone through editing and post-production.
"He blew his hand off" -- wait, what?!
+1
What I love the most about this scene is the coordination of all the soldiers (except those derps next to the time traveler). Those in the immediate vicinity and heard the grenade call ducked immediately. The ones further away react after the explosion.
That's a good observation. This film can practically be used for historical reference XD
They didn't have much choice. That close to the front any hesitation while reacting could mean death.
Hadn't seen that one.
One thing I just figured out - was the guy who blew his hand off - yelled "Grenade!" to warn everyone - then held his hand up above the tank with the grenade in it (so it wouldn't fucking kill him). We didn't see the grenade explode - because this scene didn't make it to special effects where they would have put that part in. Thus, when the guy climbs back down from the tank - he has both hands - because they never finished working on the scene.
First time through I didn't pick up on that and I'm like "Blew his hand off? He had both hands ..."
.
yes, he didnt want anyone else to get hurt and probably be killed for those crimes, so he got articled 115 or if he's lucky an article 15.
I'm sure it's Brad Pitt's voice yelling "grenade!" :\
Thanks, this helps a lot. I was like "WTF are they talking about 'blew his hand off'" He had both hands and looked fine. LOL
What I thought happened was
Someone yelled grenade that made the Person have a breakdown due to PTSD. When the Lt. asked what happened, The Tank Commander sarcastically said that he blew his hand off.
Any ways, Thanks for the explaination
1:06 Look at how his hand trembles nervously. Love the small attention to detail.
Check out the dinner table scene. Wardaddy is reading the newspaper, as relaxed as he’s ever gonna be, and the hand is still trembling. The tension never leaves.
This touched a nerve for me, was recon and seen some really tough men, was in some of the modern peace keeping missions, one day this corporal I looked up to just broke down, his daughter was born 2 months ago, he had near misses in war zones, he was in my unit for an un sponsored mission. One day he just couldn’t leave the bed on a regular recon patrol, it was definitely ptsd.
The comment section here is full of clueless internet machos calling him a coward
Война калечит не только тела но и души.
@@МихаилПетренко-ч2в sorry I don’t speak Russian, what you said is correct, physical wounds are much easier to heal, he was afraid of not seeing his daughter and wife which caused a mental breakdown, every patrol he went on he was not afraid of his life because the whole platoon will sacrifice our lives for each other, he was afraid of not coming back and making his wife a widow and his daughter an orphan, which slowly ate into his mind.
Me being much younger than him do understand his pain because I married young and have 2 kids already but to put in his perspective I don’t want my wife to be a widow and my 2 kids to orphans
@@sethjr9815 wounds heal
but when the mind break, u can't really patch that up
@@Codex_0613 that is too true
All these deleted clips wouldve added more context to the movie
You're right... they would, BUT... with EVERY SINGLE MOVIE THERE ARE PEOPLE LIKE YOU... wanting ALL these clips to be added to a movie. The EDITORS are LIMITED to the TIME they can make a movie. If you had ANY IDEA how many scenes are left on the floor... you'd crap. And each movie would be 8 hours long. So stop asking for you hand held through a movie because you can't make the logical jump from one scene to the next without every little single detail being explained/shown. It can't happen. Ever. Never will. Deal with it.
@@user-lq4wk5ub1k Dude wtf. He's not talking about adding a scene that explains if the ending of Inception is real or if its a dream he's talking about deleted scenes that simply add weight to the movie and make it feel more complete. Scenes that make the characters real, give them more emotion, and backstory. I story that is built around the personal bonds and relationships of a small group of soldiers is depleted when you remove literally everything personal about them. The theatrical version of this movie was easily passable as a B- movie but if you added at least 20 minutes or so back in, this would easily rival Saving Private Ryan and the other greats
Not really. This scene did nothing for the story.
@@231mac I can't tell who this comment is directed towards but in my opinion I think this scene still would've been interesting to see in the final cut. At least the first part, maybe cut out the bit with the guy blowing his hand off. But it helps with making Norman more terrified, shows how some soldiers are breaking down after fighting for so long. That kinda good stuff is always welcome in these movies.
wwwDOTfiferDOTinfo Are you on your period,..bitch?
So that guy survived by blowing off his hand cause that tank and the entire crew got wrecked later by a Tiger didnt it?
Stekar Knugen yep, he saved his own life by being a pussy
That's how shit works.
Actually he was probably pretty fuckin happy when he finds out his crew was disintegrated by a Tiger I a few hours later.
What the fuck?
no Right! No witnesses to write the report against him. Soz but there it is. Lived to die another day
Shouldn't have been deleted.
Good backstory, showed the LT in a bit more believable level of WW2 Era competence while still showing his inexperience, and showed the horror that those men went through was so great they were taking drastic measures when they broke.
Shortened up a little maybe but kept in, this would have been an eye opener for the terror Norman was expecting to find.
Half a century ago I worked with an NCO who had served in Europe. He told me of an occasion when his unit was situated across a valley from the Germans. They sat there for several days knowing that the enemy was dug in and prepared.
Finally, when the order to attack came through, one soldier shot himself in the foot. Unfortunately, he was carrying an M-3 submachine gun and blew off most of his foot.
Oh, and when they made the attack, the Germans had already retreated from their position.
*sad trombone noise*
Wth not sure if to laugh or cry, I’ve served with many nations for un in the 2000s but we never tried to hurt ourselves.
Getting shot hurts a lot and can die but the rounds we are issued with can cause you to bleed out, it’s definitely ptsd
When you're young, you're foot loose....
@@ActinOnOrder I understand what you mean, right now we are more about trigger safety, the number of miss fire and non good barrel control is pretty insane. Can write a book on miss fire stories, was an nco, would scream at them for the lack of safety, now my voice horse😭
Some russians conscripts are shooting to their foot , sabotaging their own equipment , trying to avoid fighting the ukranians in the Eastern Ukraine Theater. Hell yeah, even some boys are asking their friends to break their arms to avoid Putler " General mobilization " .
The way the Lt. Uses his hand signals while they're standing right there gets me every time
I'm now convinced we need a re-cut of "Fury." It's a character-study of a close-knit crew in mortal danger, not classic hollywood, and it got turned into standard fare in the editing room, I'm sure of it
0:56 look at the Lieutenant...
Now that's some sign of frustration, apparently... but that cap...
Love the way the commanders treat the Lieutenant. He's an officer but obviously hasn't seen or done shit compared to the enlisted guys. Showcases quite an accurate portrayal of chain of command. And how sometimes it's not as clear cut as it is on paper.
When I first joined my squadron in VietNam I was a very green Ensign right out of flight school. We had an E-6 flight engineer on my crew who treated me like shit. He’d pour coffee in my helmet bag, trash my hat etc. Looking back, I wish I’d invited him behind the hangar and settled it physically. Win or lose, he may have had some respect…who knows. I know I certainly would have felt better, instead of just enduring it. I think by the end of that first tour he may have had some respect, I don’t know, but the shit stopped after a few months.
"good man I guess. He's got his limits, we got ours"
My grand father was the gunner in a Sherman for the Canadians armored division in ww2.
I always remembered when he told me they had to find a new driver almost every other day.
He told me it was common, they would freeze/panic/couldn't handle the stress.
at 2:12 there is a guy with a black shirt behind the tank :D I don't think he belongs there :P
Toasterus Prime isn't that a chaplain
Toasterus Prime he is escorted by two soldier's who look like a group. I believe it's a priest or something
Toasterus Prime dude I can't see him
Oh there it is
not a priest. production crew member. he does not move a muscle when they yell "grenade"
2:11 There is a pimp behind the tank lol
Officer Zarius Extremely good eye! That dumbass fucked up the scene, bet ya that’s why they cut it.
@@gregflores8959 No, they could've easily edited that out the reason is unclear but probably didn't want to portray US soldiers in a negative light
He's a priest you idiots
Not a priest, chaplain, or a pimp. He's a crew member. If you notice when they yell "grenade" he didn't even flinch which means he's just a crew member
US military chaplains have helmets with a white cross insignia on it.
"Hey Pete, keep your spaces"
"Han?"
"Keep your spaces"
"My wha?"
"Keep your spaces!" This guy xD
Para Jay i heard that aswell and i laughed so hard
I remember watching fury for the first time. I was maybe 14 and shook to the bone. At the end of the movie i cried. Not because ist was so sad but because ist was so overwhelming
it was by far the worst war movie i watched so far.
Beta male
@@blackice4649 why?
@@humanafterallTF2 ??
@@blackice4649 it may have a lot of inconsistencies and historical inaccuracies when it comes to the battle scenes, but the way they explored how a tank crew at the time operate and their relationships is pretty fantastic
I met a gentleman who was part of a tank crew in WWII. I was a teen in the 80's when I met him, and this gentleman (Harold) was a regular camper at a state campground my family regularly attended. I got to know him over a few summers of my teen years playing horseshoes and penny poker with him. We knew he was a WWII vet, he didn't speak a lot about it, the only story we got was how he was wounded when (my memory is hazy here) I believe he said fragments of some round (can't remember if it was a grenade or shrapnel from shell) entered the compartment. Harold and another guy were seriously hurt, and another member of the crew was superficially injured. The guy who was superficially injured thought that Harold and the other crew member were dead, and broke down emotionally. I remember Harold saying the incident completely broke the superficially injured guy...I can't remember all the details, but he said that this fella was as tough and seasoned as anyone serving, and I think had even been wounded before, but this incident wrecked him emotionally and ultimately he ended up discharged. I just remember him sadly saying "it messed us all up good". I was too young to realize I was talking to history. I wish I could say I got to spend hours listening to his stories, but alas that is the only one I have. I fondly remember the 4-5 times a summer from 1985-1989 that I spent throwing horse shoes with him and his brother during the day, and sitting around the fire or playing cards around an old Coleman lantern with him and my dad at night. I was always excited to see he was in the park camping too when we were there. I think back how kind him and his brother were to let me join them throwing shoes. Hanging with the greatest generation - I just didn't realize it at the time, but I do now and will remember him and everyone who has served fondly.
I'm proud to say my uncle was a tank commander during Operation Tourch in North Africa. He earned the Silver Star by confusing the Germans and French Vichey in front of them by backing their tanks from the top of a hill and moving sideways along the back and moving back to the top to take more shots. He was with four or five tanks. They fooled the Germans into believing there were many more tanks than just a few. They were successful in holding back the enemy long enough to allow the soldiers behind them to reinforce themselves. My uncle fought under General Patton. The weird thing is that he never mentioned it as I was growing up. I only heard of this story from my family after he died of old age.
What a nice thing to see before battle eh Norman?
Quite an eye opener, ain't it?
Alice!
DatOneAsianKid that's already past
He was too scared to go and fight, but brave enough to blow off his own arm.
That is called desperation. Desperate people are very dangerous to everyone including themselves.
exactly, this scene is bs and shouting "look Americans war is really brutal", Definitely an idea of somebody that never spent much time with veterans, true accounts, and never served for himself in the forces
Well judging by him saying "I can't go back out there", he definetly has fought, several times even, but the stuff he saw really just pushed him to his limit
And I shit you not, no one should ever underestimate the horrors you could see in war, no matter how tough you think you are
loosing a limb is very different to loosing your life.
@@dd11111 dieing with honour, or living without 1 arm whole life, unable to do shitton of things.
Another reason this was cut that I don't think anyone picked up on yet, look behind Wardaddy at 2:10 there's just a production crew member chilling in a black t shirt with a headset on for almost 20 seconds of the scene :D
You know shits real when a tank has double 50 cals on it
actually, it's just one. The top hatch machine gun is an M1919 .30 cal, the one beside it that is fully exposed is the M2 .50
Being a tanker was hard and scary. At anymoment a he or ap round would come tearing its way thru your combat vehicle. And the cramped spaces would drive you crazy. Its not an easy job.
Tj Campbell serving as a soldier is already not an easy job...
Tankers had a whole manner of ways they could die, none pleasant: tank shell blowing you to pieces, smoke choking you out, burned alive, catching shrapnel, things were meant to be rolling shields but against the forces they were they were rolling death boxes
Those who are whinning about the young LT's character probably don't have the understanding about the military leadership building process of officers. He respected his more experienced NCO associates by not bragging too much and by this process he would gain experience and be a part of the grooming process to be a General to lead and plan the various commands and even Army. Lee, Pershing, McArther, Patton or the latest Petraeus or Mattis and all other rose through the rank this process.
The job of an experienced NCO is not only to lead his squad or platoon in battle, it is to teach young company-grade officers the ropes so that they can function effectively in combat themselves. Some senior officers will not allow an inexperienced younger officer to function independently until the officer in question passes muster with a seasoned, experienced sergeant or other NCO. Of course, due to attrition of junior officers in combat, experienced sergeants are often given battlefield commissions - and promoted on the spot. That's how First Sergeant Carwood Lipton, Easy Co., 506th PIR, 101st AB, became a second lieutenant - to name an example that many people will know. Lipton's superior performance during the Battle of the Bulge caught the eye of his superiors and that was that.
Then on the other hand you have Doug Neidermeyer from the movie Animal House.... KIA in Vietnam by his own troops!
This is a movie.....
Yep, they wanna survive and have respect they will listen to the NCOs. Not doing exactly what they say, but listen to their advice.
well put GeorgiaBoy, thats a very fine way of describing battlefield attrition, C Carwood Lipton was indeed a fine senior NCO, Junior Officer
glad to see shane managed to fight in WW2 and zombies in the same lifetime.
2:12 who is this guy standing behind the tank w/ the t-shirt and necklace? doesn't look very 1940's to me.
iLikeC00kieDough its a rehersal for the scene, he would not be in the final cut
He's the guy that pimped their ride.
Good eyes, didn't catch that. Whistler from blade maybe?
Looks like a priest
iLikeC00kieDough i think that guy is a staff or a crew on this movie production..
I wish that was in the movie, that would help to explain Norm's hesitations so much...
This is one of the best WW2 movies ever, next to Das Boot. Amazing.
No bc when sgt collier shouted grenade then behind lucy sue a crew cast/crew member apperars
2:11 old dude time traveler behind the tank
funny story, that guy was actually fired for fucking this scene up, it was deemed more cost than it was worth to edit him out as well as the arm. that's the reason they deleted this scene. he was supposed to be working a support role on scene, but was actually in a phone call when they started filming ( you can see the headset in his right ear) and was supposed to be on the other side of the tank so he would be not in the shot, though originally it was going to be shot from the other angle and he would have stood there. was rumored to be an alcoholic and was probably drunk right here lol.
Srg.collier "i got words for u sixty words in a minute" haha.
I was so confused until i realized that this was before they added the effects in post. Its actually really cool seeing them have to act around having no effects or ques. Really interesting
Lol what is crawling on the hatch next to him at 2:03 ? Putting something in place for the explosion FX?
it's the head of either the actor playing their machine gunner or a film crew member
@Ai Angel What the fuck you doing here
@@berbo4063 questions science couldn't answer
@@berbo4063 She's an AI. She is learning the darkest parts of our humanity...
Wasn’t expecting to see you here, nice channel ✨
Thanks for sharing because the acting from the guy who blew his hand off was really good. Disturbing and sad but good acting.
"I just don't feel safe, sir. I mean, that one tank has Brad Pitt, Jon Bernthal, Shia LeBouf, that guy from End of Watch and that kid from Percy Jackson's movies. We're extras at best."
2:10 I lost it when he yelled grenade and EVERYBODY DROPPED XD even the dude on the left just dove inside the tank
this would've been good. also the fact that someone filled in for him so fast would've shown how quickly every tanker will be replaced by new troops.
Eh ... not really. They could have come up with someone that quick if there were crews around from disabled tanks - but it was pretty common for them to be running short. That was the thing about a crew of 5 - you would often at least have 4.
Welcomes new guy "don't blow your hand off" lmao
I like Brad Pitt's line. "Good man, I guess. He's got his limits, we got ours. "
Thats how i feel everytime before i teach my year 10 GCSE class.
I watched this in school I’ll never forget it
This movie really reminds of classic movie Bridge at Remagen.
One hell of a movie. Timeless.
Top: "I got one for ya, 60 words a minute"
Grady: *chuckles*
Bible from inside: "hehehehehe"
I like this movie. I don't usually watch movies more than once but I've seen this one several times. It's got a good pace to it, nice realism, and it's not the average Hollywood hero movie where bullets bounce off the hero and the enemy dies dramatically for our entertainment.
LoL, nice realism? I don't think we watched the same movie.
that guy failing to put his hat on
When your individual mental health was less important than getting the job done, and everyone's mental health is important, except when the job that needs to be done is more important than your individual mental health. This movie needs an all cut scenes director's version.
John Smith exactly, man!!! this movie showed a side of ww2 that only a few, very few movies/series dare to show
Colonel David Hackworth (1930 - 2005) wrote about grunts doing this during the Korean War:
During the initial American retreat from North Korea, the infantry were retreating across the country on foot in the approaching winter weather without any winter gear. Soldiers started injuring themselves so they could get airlifted out of the freezing cold. Stick your hand up out of your foxhole during a firefight, or set off a grenade in it with only your leg dangling in ; you can injure a limb bad enough that you get sent off the frontlines. He almost did it as a young soldier to get away from the cold, but ended up taking all night to dig the perfect hole and called it off when the sun came up.
Fury, starring Brad Pitt, and Saving private ryan, starring Tom Hanks are some of the best WWII European action movies I've ever seen. For example, the movie Fury is a tank war movie that is more fun to look at. Doesn't glorify American soldiers too much like Soviet (Russian) T-34 tank war movies😅😅😅😅
02:11 right site in the the middle of the screen. thats the most badass guy in this war, going into war with a t-shirt
If the scene ended before the "grenade!" part, I think it would have been welcome. It kinda shows that the crew of the Fury isn't as hard as it could be and shows that Norman had it lucky being under Wardaddy's command. It's a little too convenient though that the other new guy happens to be an assistant driver as well.
I wouldnt mind watching a fury mini series about their travels from africa to germany ❤️
You can say whatever you want, but I enjoy watching casual scene like this.
Not every war movies have to be about shooting and blowing shit up at every moments.
Melissa but he blow his hand off
Snow this scene literally consists of a guy blowing his own arm off
Good God!! There's like 20+ mins of deleted scenes. All of them great. Would've loved to seen the full cut
I don't get tired of watching this movie
would like to see whole length including deleted parts no matter how long.
"dont blow your hand off" XD
2:11 above Brad Pitts shoulder you can see a possible film crew member.
Jed-to-the- Saba that's a priest I believe
Nah he has headphones in
Well spotted.
this is the unedited film
This is a deleted scene and the film crew wasn’t supposed to appear in the final
since it's a deleted scene and unedited, i think when he pulled the pin off the grenade, i think his arm was supposed to be blown off because he didnt move his arm at all
the lack of ambience and music kinda makes it better, to be honest...
War isn't pretty, it just is.
Binkowski: I have a question, sir. Parker: Peterson? Binkowski: I’m Binkowski, sir. Uh... you start shaving your face? *Parker just stares at him*
I feel like that was a lost moment in the film. Parker could have used the line "no, I haven't. Now shut up and follow my orders" while staring him down.
I think it would have added a bit more character to the LT, who otherwise was just a red shirt
Binkowski was a good character. Sucks that he was killed in the beginning of the tiger fight scene in the back of the tank formation. You don't even really see him die. just his tank explode.
Here’s a little detail that I missed the first time I watched this, Wardaddy calls “Bog” on the radio which is the correct WWII term for the Bow Gunner, Norman’s position. Nice little bit of dialogue that they included
Nice cigarette
"Best job I ever had"
Best job I ever had.
Best job I ever had.
Best job I ever had
Best job I ever had.
Best f. Job
this entire scene was so solid with such awesome acting and they cut it
i like how the two new recruits norman and the grenade guy survived that tank platoon
2:10 That guy behind the tank just chillin'
'I got one for ya. 60 words a minute!' - lol.
That was the most unconvincing punch I ever witnessed.
the sound effects were not finished as were the suposed blown off hand, and the guy standing behind the tank wearing a black shirt and gold chain
a sound effect makes a world of difference, thats why it wasnt convincing
A coward dies a hundred deaths. A hero dies but once.
Wow. Can’t believe they took this scene out.
I would say that the movie "Fury" as a whole with the exception of the ending seems pretty realistic for a WWII flick. As a FMF combat Vet we work with Tankers occasionally and they were an interesting group. But I Core RVN was not Europe and the nature and conduct of their war was a lot different. Complicated in a different way. Especially the weather.
0:56 the man with the cap is the reason this scene didn't make it to the final cut xD
2:12 time traveler behind the tank taking a look at what happened.
Where?
sub or gulag Ik like where this dude at
Xd hes probably some film crew member that is doing stuff.
Iv lived with smokers so long that i can even smell the smoke through my screen
It's sad, because this scene is good, realy good.
Thank for this scene.
2:10 You can see a guy dressed in modern clothes next to the second tank on the right.
Omg. I didn’t even see that at first.
Ohh, i can see him now. Just after brad pit duck down, after he got covered by brad body
Yeah. He looks a little to old to be there too. Actually ... that could have been part of the reason this scene was deleted ...
.
Would have made a gruesome scene, I love how they made the new guy clean his own station and he finds the previous guy's face just sitting on something. War is not for those who like to eat I suppose.
Just another of this crews 'hazing' process....pack of lunatics.
What scene is that?
1:33 "Do your job". He must be related to New England Patriots head coach Bill Belichick.
Its amazing this film even exists at all with all the "deleted" scenes.
2:17 "Are we good?" Meanwhile dude's just screaming bloody murder XD
Also 2:57 The way he just deadpans "He blew his hand off" I just can't get over it
Just want to point out that the replacement bow gunner for the “Lucy Sue” was there with his thumb up his rear the whole time... what’s the point of dragging Norman in to replace “Fury”s gunner?
Sony should do an extended version of this movie
someone needs to take all of these perfectly good deleted scenes and edit it into the actual final cut of the movie
who was the GUY with black shirt and necklace behind the Lucy Sue at 2:11.... must be Time Traveler !!!