NFT Has hit a new low...
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 31 май 2024
- This video goes hard, feel free to rip .mp4 and reupload
🧎#Subscribe🧎
🥤Gfuel(affiliate): gfuel.ly/31Kargr
#Code #Pewdiepie
✨My Stores✨
👕 Merch: represent.com/store/pewdiepie
👘 Tsuki: tsuki.market/
👔 Based: www.based.gg
📱Customized Devices: rhinoshield.io/pewdiepie
⚙️My Setup (affiliate links)⚙️
🪑 Chair: bit.ly/3r51IUS
⌨️ 🖱️ Keyboard & Mouse: ghostkeyboards.com/pages/pewd...
🕹️ Pewdiepie's Pixelings
iOS: buff.ly/2pNG0aT
Android: buff.ly/34C68nZ
🕹️Pewdiepie’s Tuber Simulator
iOS: apps.apple.com/us/app/pewdiep...
Android: play.google.com/store/apps/de...
🎮Arkade Blaster Controller (#ad): • Arkade Blaster Instruc... Arkade Blaster Pro!
⛰️NordVPN DOWNLOAD (affiliate link)⛰️
Go to NordVPN.com/pewdiepie and use code PEWDIEPIE to get a 2-year plan plus 1 additional month with a huge discount. It’s risk free with Nord’s 30 day money-back guarantee! 
Развлечения
0 dislikes. This video is doing amazingly. Glad 100% of the population agrees with pewdiepie.
@Lite Cosmo lol
@Lite Cosmo I didn’t know it was opposite day
@Lite Cosmo no videos lol….
Lulz. EweTube corporatocracy removed them for making the Brandon admin look bad.
It would be so legendary if Keanu Reeves laughing at NFTs devalued the whole market
We need "Keanu Reeves laughing at NFTs" memes.
Nah it’s more likely someone will make a gif of keanu laughing and make it into an NFT.
Yea imagine being happy that many artist lost their job just because you don't agree with something, so funny.
this is the most reddit comment ive ever seen
Why? What research have you actually done on NFT's? Like, WHY would you want something that helps artists to fail. Sure, it's got issues but that means the ecosystem is nascent and needs to mature. FFS, such an awful take.
The most infuriating part is that there are digital artists whose artwork gets stolen and turned into an NFT, some filed lawsuits but there are those who actually lost like wtf
and the Background check is broken to begin with
Why wouldn't he lose the lawsuit? NFTs aren't about selling, buying or trading art (aka the work itself). You might even argue that NFTs are transformative works that do not include the original work. NFTs aren't about art or technology at this point but about $$$$$$.
@@gwenwalravens8030 lol fuck this response
@@swarler Why?
@@swarler no hes right, there are literal stock google images/getty images that are nfts. its all about the blockchain address not the photo. its all just a get rich quick scheme
I genuinely don't like NFTs. For one, they HAVE stolen art from artists, then sold them as NFTs. They have disrespected Stan Lee. And as someone who loves biology and nature its self, they are harmful to the environment from the TONS of energy they require to make. Like, seriously. I hope this dies off.
What if you make your own art and do it?
@@peachpie3597 They hurt the environment, fuck em anyway
@@vesuvius115 such a stupid and uninformed statement, energy consumption depends on the blockchain, there are various blockchains which operate eco friendly due to low energy consumption
@@peterpeter287 Don't care. There have been multiple instances of people getting their work stolen. Even if there are some that don't use a bunch of resources, yall are still committing theft. Don't give a fuck.
Let's not add that disney used Stan Lee, a man who passed a way to promote their NFTS. They desecrated the dead, so again, I don't care.
The people who made the Stan Lee NFTs should lose access to his account. It's disgusting what they did.
MY NAME THOUGH 👀👀
Honestly though, my blood's boiling from that. Imagine taking one of the most beloved deceased people ever and selling his image.
WHAT WHO DID THAT
Nah man, literally anyone who is holding stan lee account for whatever reason should lose access to it. Doesnt matter if he uses it to advertise nft or uses it to advertise charity, it's not your goddamn account, keep your hands off it
@@krishnadeva9837 True. They were probably his social media manager, but why keep doing that after he died? He was abused before his death too.
One of my fiancee's art pieces got stolen and turned into an NFT without her permission. Thankfully DeviantArt notified her of it, now she's having to prove she's the original owner and creator, and may have to seek out legal actions against the site because they don't require proof of original ownership before selling.
@LuckyHit w0t?
@@bintangrigel2946 one of tye paintings of the fiancee😶
@LuckyHit why not tho, "nfts support artists". she'll sue them and claim it easily cause she'll "earn a lot of money from the nft".
@@bintangrigel2946 one of his fiancee's ART
Wish you and your fiancee good luck to win this case
Owning a NFT is like buying a Lamborghini then leaving at the dealership, then getting a taxi back home
then selling that lamborghini for double the price
now instead of actual art sold by the actual artist, we have art stolen and sold without artist consent and big environmental impact. Beautiful. (if you buy jpg you are stupid)
Ah yes NFT's making Plagiarism legal.
NFTs: A brilliant way to separate fools from their money.
"But bro I'll get invited to parties"- 12 year old with no friends
NFTs system is actually more smarter than Apple with their iPhone, macbook, etc.
To squeeze more money from those idiots.
its like csgo and tf2 economy but your ownership is even more limited
To the person reading this: Even though I don’t know you, I wish youu the best of what life has to offer ✨💕
There are scams in every possible market that exists, youre the type of person to switch sides 10 years later after you see headlines of people making huge money on actually good NFT projects. Im not afraid to lose some money to make way more
i was neutral on NFTs until shortly after they blew up people started stealing artworks from hardworking artists and selling them as NFTs. of course it went as far as stealing a deceased artist's art to sell as NFTs, and of course it's happening again.
Plus hacking a lot of legit artist accounts to shill nft's
Was it qinniart? Cause that's fucking disgusting if they did that. It's awful doing it to living people but the level of disrespect of making money out of a dead person who, obviously, can't defend themselves is immeasurable
peoples are fucked when it comes to money huh
If I'm not mistaken, there was also an indie game creator who got the trailer of their game stolen for NFT. Has it been resolved yet?
@@heyits_Marlo yes it was qinniart
Pewds: "not a scam"
Also Pewds: "You could win a million dollars"
I mean you COULD
I’m glad Pewds spoke up about this. It’s a pretty ridiculous situation and I honestly can’t wait to see these people realize that they wasted away their life savings on digital art that can be easily stolen or reproduced. Atleast with commissions you can get the copyright and the art is to your specifications. And with physical art it’s even better since it’s a physical piece of art you can rent out or lend to galleries
The fact that someone stole Qinni's (an artist who passed away) art and tried to sell it as an NFT makes me feel sick to my stomach, just seriously evil and gross
rip steel fender is unscathed
Seriously WAT!? that's fook up!
@KINDLY HELP ME REACH TO 100K SUB shut up.
That's another level of disrespect man. Qinni's arts are amazing. Even now she's gone, she left her art with us and represents her story. I hope the stolen arts are taken down.
I love Qinni's art. To stoop to such a level dang. Like I know nfts steals a lot of artists work and now also disrespecting people's on a whole other level. Disappointment.
The stupidest thing about NFT is that people who promote this think that a ton of people want to own that shit.
They ain't Mona Lisa dude. It's just auto generated character creator output at this point.
@DONT WOWW YOU DON'T EVER SHUT UP
@DONT piss
I put a rabbits head on the body of a guy wearing a suit. I call it man bun. Give me money now
@DONT WOW I DIDN’T KNOW AN ABANDONED CHILD HAS ACCESS TO RUclips
Yea man for real. There are a few diamond in the rough artists out there that have been doing shit on instagram way back ever since this shit blew up, starting from street art and stuff like that. Those concepts are cool, but all of these stupid avatar characters are complete scams.
NFT"S are biggest scam of this time!
Ikr
No shit sherlock.
nfts are the future my man, 99% of people are just uneducated on them
@@BillerKean47 still people sell shitty drawing for the price of a jet
just because you don't like how people are making money off it doesn't make it a scam.
*Starting early is the best way of getting ahead to build wealth, investing remains a priority. The stock market/crypto market has plenty of opportunities to earn a decent payout even in a downtrend, with the right skills and proper understanding of how the market works.*
Courage taught me: no matter how bad a crisis gets, any sound of investment will eventually pay off - Carlos Helu
@@tioyulanda6171 You are so right. I know because my advisor is able to find so many good plays. My portfolio literally went from $300k to $1.1m last year (not counting withdrawals I made) all really exciting. I guess it’s the experience and better judgement.
Ms Eunice T Mattia is her name. She is quite known and can be liaised on Telegam with the username *Investwithmattia* 😊😊😊😊
*I invest with mrs Eunice mattia too , she charge a 15%commission on profit made after every trading session which is fair compare to the effort she put in to make huge profit…*
Mrs Eunice Mattia really knows her way around trading, its evident from her deep knowledge of how the market works, reading signals to perfection, i feel very safe trading with her.
We live in a society where a man paid 3k for a jpeg and thought to himself: OMG what a steal!!!
I don't get it, Honestly I won't pay $1 for a monkey jpeg
The point is it is bought because it either looks cool and they want to collect it or they won’t to resell it because they think it will gain profit
the fun part is that he did not even get the jpeg, he got a entry in a registry/blockchain saying that a certain hyperlink to a website hosting a jpg is linked to his wallet.
@@mylex817 which could be deleted at any point in time
@@mylex817 this is why you will stay poor, unless you learn to read and research
1) it's not a link to website, but to a decentralized file system that cannot be taken down
2) majority of NFTs offer real life utility to the holders besides just a useless jpeg
The best application for NFTs: Furries. They commision art for their fursonas, and when they wanna change things up (or need more money) they sell on their existing fursona to others.
3:00 that is also how I laughed with "Digital scarcity of things that are unique and can't be copied". I'd laugh about as hard if someone told me that dehydrated water is on sale. Who the fuck tells people "digital scarcity is a thing" and expects to be taken seriously?
I find it ironic that they're making NFT's of the Matrix, when the Matrix is about this idea of being trapped in a virtual unreal world...
People will need to copyright their image.
I got a matrix add while reading this what the fuck
feels like not may ppl are seeing the irony ... that interview was a blast
well, actually the matrix is a big allegory for trans existance, but NFTs do suck doe
Whoever convinced anyone that NFT's are a good investment is an incredible conman
It was Victor Chaos
It's the exact same thing as modern art
@@radhiadeedou8286 how
it is if you know how to ;) ...personally i don't look at it as an investment though, more like flipping. That said I was able to 6x the "investment" if you can call it that.
It's gambling with pretend money lol It's not about the art or "appreciating the artist" either. NFTs are the biggest scam I've ever seen tho and it's funny seeing ppl actually spend money to buy a copypaste monkey
From what I can tell, Steam and SEGA are the two companies I know that are safe from NFTs (for now)
What bothers me about NFTs the most is the fact it brings the problem artist have with traditional art is ppl reselling their art for way more than the artist did, and the artist never sees a cent of it.....
**NFT is all about supporting artists**
Artists : "nft? What tf is that?"
@KelvinBB ok but who cares
Artists whose art was sold as an nft without permission:😐😐😐😐
@KelvinBBCNN's John Griffin is disgusting 🤮🤮🤮 at least your content doesn't drive off of the atrocities on children.
@KelvinBB don't click this dudes page he just wants views without doing the work
No but fr, what is an nft
So... NFTs are basically like adoptables that have been around in the art community since forever, but a "new" crappy corporate scam version? Why
I still don't understand adoptables
@@jonarhax3388 adoptables are basically OC (orginal character) designs that an artist makes and sells, so if someone wants to have an OC but doesn't wanna design one or can't, they can simply buy a design from someone else. Honestly it's way better than NFTs because atleast than you're supporting small artists and not big corporations :/
Basically oc Trafficking
Well less like adoptables because you don’t buy it for the art, you buy it for the value so you can upsell it to someone else and make a profit
And you can do the environmental equivalent of dropkicking a baby seal everytime you make one! Truly amazing
Peter Schiff had a good point about them (NFTs), they should be used for licenses and proof of ownership (titles, certificates of birth/marriage etc).
or they just shouldn’t be used, as secure as a bitcoin hash system is they’re shit for the environment.
Not to mention that NFTs are actually creating a HUGE amount of carbon footprint compared to industrial factories
How? (Although Im against NFTs anyway, I'm Genuinely curious)
@@eeshajamil8503 There's a lot of references that can explain it better in detail, but the notion of it is the way people get bitcoins or cryptocurrencies in general is through data mining, which is basically using tons of computers and machines. Thus, more energy used, and more carbon footprint being acquired. Although, there are some cryptocurrencies are environmental-friendly, but the majority of it is still have a big carbon footprint. Hope this helps!
@@caitlin5159 that is true for bitcoin, but NFT's are sold on the Ethereum Blockchain using Ethereum which is significantly less power hungry than bitcoin.
@@mW-lx9qo i saw somewhere that ethereum wastes as much energy as ireland
@@velgard. the banking system wastes double of all cryptos combined, so if crypto replaced banking entirely it would actually cut transaction energy consumption by over half
Paying artists for a commission of a specific thing you want: "Can we like talk more about the pricing, i still think it's too much..."
Paying random NFTs: "500K?! THAT'S A STEAL"
i heard you can buy some just for being good in bed. : )
As an artist: YES ALL OF MY YESS!!!! Give me your money instead of buying a dumb generic picture of an ape 🙏
@@thesmolgoth I bet you charge $$$ your art for an anime type style lmao
@@erebus7306 I bet you can't make art
@@erebus7306 I'd say I charge a fair price for my work. Not sure if it falls under anime, but sure 😃
NFTs are a great example of a wonderful idea executed in a terrible way.
I dont get how it can even be considered a wonderful idea in the first place. Making people pay for an image that's available to anyone? That's just like charging someone to comment "first" on a video.
@@Select2Play You're talking about the execution, the original idea is just to have a decentralized title of property, it could be used to buy physical goods or have licenses and skip bureaucratic and centralized authorities that could revoke or cancel your title at any time. The royalty system is also pretty interesting
@@Select2Play these kinds of price for the average nft should be from artworks that have been spent time on by like minimum 2 years in the making tbh
@@ItzAveragePlayz I very much doubt these low effort jpegs were more than a day in the making, let alone years.
@@Ramix09 Using the token to proof that you're the artist is one thing, but selling it for millions just so a guy can say he has the first copy of it is insane. Have the token and use it to prove copyright so you can control use, that's as far as it should go. If you want to sell it, then make it something not reproducible.
Why are we as a society NOT hunting down who “okay’d 👍🏼” that Stan Lee thing & making their life hell?
Terrible thing to comment, this controversy will get all the attention it needs to get shut down or devalued peacefully.
The fact that NFTs have basically become snake oil to an extent is very funny to me
They're practically shaking Stan Lee's dead body for any loose change. This whole thing is thoroughly fucked.
@KINDLY HELP ME REACH TO 100K SUB WOW, THANK YOU, I DIDN'T.
Same with Leaving Neverland, although more people enjoyed watching the scammers shit on MJ's dead body despite it being debunked immediately.
Wow never heard anyone say it like that before. But I still agree
The fact that someone used Stan Lee's twitter account to sell an nft is disgusting
@deliriouspepeg there isn't a better way to remember somebody than a selfie... I guess
@deliriouspepeg ⚰️ 👦🤳
@deliriouspepeg I hate those people
I like how your channel gives honest opinions about stuff.
I love how the NFT doesn't even needed prove or process about art. Just who stole it and upload first, who gets the money.
Before watching video: "what is NFT?"
Me after watching the video: "I don't like NFT"
This was me after watching the Keanu Reeves interview this past week !
Like it even less after hearing abt Stan Lee in this video
I’m still confused what it is. Like what’s stopping me from just screenshooting it or turning it into a jpeg?
@@diiii_mond you dont have ownership of it then.. its considered as "fake" and has no value, kinda like repainting the mona lisa, yes it can be sold too be its mot as expensive as the true mona lisa
@@diiii_mond Keep this in mind - what is being sold is a mere hyperlink to the image, not even the image. Right click and save / screenshot is your ownership - as at least it will be on your harddrive.
Nothing is stopping you, I'd do the same of any image I liked. Ppl buying into it do not understand the technology behind it - the link can easily turn into a 404 page - meaning you don't own anything - you however have the directions to where the image is - The hyperlink ;)
@@emlen5847 It's not really like repainting the Mona Lisa at all. You could never perfectly replicate the original Mona Lisa. That is a tangible item. You can, however, perfectly replicate an image on the internet with a screenshot.
Reality check with Felix is THE BEST thing to watch here.
TO TELL THE TRUTH I MAKE GOOD VIDEOS BUT PEOPLE DON'T WATCH 😞😭😭
Ken like
Amen.
I cant get the image of butters ranting about NFT out of my head xD
Damn, poor Stan Lee. Dude didn't even get the money he deserved when Disney was cashing and still is cashing in...now people are using his likeness for this scam? It's disgusting.
Finally an influencer said this, a lot of people thinks that NFTs are serious investments and profitable when it’s not. Big Crypto influencers like Jake Paul, KSI and others are able to take profit because they are able to popularize the NFT, just like how a spoon used by Michael Jackson for example would worth a lot more than a spoon used by a normal guy. It’s a great concept and could be used as a media for artists to sell artwork and collectibles but right now it’s just a cash-grab and a massive scam.
who asked?
I asked.
Crypto is backed by CP papers ... This house of cards is coming down ..
Not exactly a scam but I agree.
Dont say its a scam when you havent tried it yourself. I have personally made alot of money with nfts these past months and i am not an influencer with millions of followers or something like that. You can make some good cash with it if you just think smart unlike 90% of the people in the nft space.
it honestly feels like the NTF's are going to be abused by people who just want to make a quick buck off of someone else's hard work.
😈
already happening
@@lookitsurei I'm aware that it's already happening, but it really sucks to see bad people making money off of something that they never even made. 🤦🏻♀️
@@CHEYMIX I know, but you'd think that there'd be something in place to protect someone's work from being stolen and sold, without the person's permission.
Well you're not wrong. It is already getting tested and will ready be abused, see how Ubisoft goes hard introducing their NFT skins? Like if you knew how much micro transactions they got in their games before this NFT trend, let's just prepare for the worst and witness how other company will do this as well.
I want to see NFT tech be used for minting the official IDs and Documents of ownership etc etc. because then you cant lose it and it cant be forged.
It would save A LOT of time from bureaucratic bullshit and/or legal disputes of who owns what and whatnot.
So like how back in the day you would keep a bill of sale for anything valuable you had.
@@thewizardoz3917 Amongst other examples, yes. I was thinking more towards a property ownership documents such as land or real estate as I'm aware of a few examples where people had some land passed down to them and are registered as owners but that doesn't stop scummy relatives that have tight ties with the local governments to take them to court and try to take if from them resorting in possible forgery of documentation and false accusations.
This is just one example that came to my mind, but it has a lot of possible applications that can render corruption and forgery obsolete.
This is where NFTs would be useful, but people are stupid and just want to get rich
However, there are still many loopholes i.e. thief in MetaMask and once is stole, then 100% the ownership will change to the stealer, and the real owner can't do anything about it even when he has lawyer etc because the document's there as NFTs and can't be destroyed. That's really dangerous and I'll still prefer bureaucratic as long as we can still regulated those documents if something goes wrong.
I have been replaying the moment Keanu laughs and pewds mocks it. Dead😂
Keanu's laugh absolutely broke my soul into pieces. This man's mind is already cyberpunk 42069
lmao fr
Keanu Reeves has excellent trigger discipline and control of his firearms.
As opposed to Alec Baldwin, his laugh is Legacy Media 2001
He's a walking Reddit post lol
Keanu Reeves is a national treasure. ❤
"NFTs have reached a new low"
*New Unlocked Achievement: Do the Impossible*
MY NAME THOUGH
@KelvinBB Says the one that makes fun of famous people's death for views
All these bots. I feel so sorry for you
@@Kaidiak123 I wish there was a way for people to delete replies to their comment. Maybe they should've added that instead of deleting the dislike button :p
I may just go for the world record of getting as many bots to reply as possible. Hey bots! Reply to this!
See the invisible, ROW ROW FIGHT THE POWER
NFTs is literally just a way for big name people and companies to print money all it is
i've been waiting for pewds to create a video about nfts.
A lot of people are memeing NFTs but it’s honestly looking like a huge money laundering operation. It’s like how rich people donate to art museum they own.
No.. lol look more into this couldnt possibly even remotely be used a money laundering
@@mattcordova4186 lmao you're turning real money into something that the government can't even see let alone control, it feels like laundering even when it's legal
Anything that makes people avoid taxes, they get high on
A friend of mine just bought an apartament with a fricking airplane ntf game
It's a pyramid scheme.
One of the artists I follow on Twitter mentioned how their art was stolen and sold as an NFT. When they tried to reach out to the website these works were being sold on they gave them endless hoops to jump through. During this process, yet another piece of their art was stolen and put up for sale. There was already an issue with art theft. I know it as an artist myself. But the way things are right now, it is SO much easier to make big bucks off of someone else's work without them getting a cent of it.
Bruh, I feel so sorry for that guy. :(
So the problem is, that NFT money should have gone to the original artist?
@@phoenixdown3587 That, and when the og artist tried to reach out to the website/company in charge of these transactions, they were given late replies and endless hoops to jump through At every turn something they suggested to do didn't work. At one point they even got an email from the company saying they should start selling NFTs of their own to solve the problem 🙄
What cracks me up about the Stan Lee thing is gonna get me cancelled, even though I don't have any videos.
They used a Jewish man to promote a shady money-grab in the form of a superhero with a six-pointed star on his chest.
I get it, it's supposed to look like a chakram or something...but then they also make a token with Stan wearing the outfit!
Intentional?
Unlikely.
Tone deaf?
What did you say?
Keanu doesn't walk on water, the water holds him up in reverence.
As Pewdiepie was talking about Stan Lee being sold, I thought about Bob Ross's documentary. So sad how low people can get when it comes to someones life. Pewdiepie has big brain on huge matters in our world, keep it up
This is what happens when we go from proper capitalism to corporate capitalism. We start becoming the fucking Corpus from Warframe.
Funko anounced a Bob Ross NFT like 5 hours after the Stan Lee one 💀
@@TsukiNekota That’s so insane. People really will do anything to pocket some money, even if it means someone’s life is on the line for it and them having no idea.
@@jessiemalone5847 they have no heart and nothing believe in humanity
The bad : NFT
The good : Keanu Reeves XD
NFT
Negative Financial thinking
Bot
Reddit moment
TO TELL THE TRUTH I MAKE GOOD VIDEOS BUT PEOPLE DON'T WATCH 😞😭😭
@@milktea6676 based
Now I got an ad for nfts explaining them… thanks Felix
Pliz pewds make rewind this time
Taking a screenshot of an nft isn't funny but it makes them mad and I think that's beautiful!
@Leplivo indeed
Thinking that it makes them bad is taking the bait
@@tivia4929 You get it.
How is it not funny?
exactly
Let's be honest here, NFT's has never been about the artists, from the get go and i have seen the same with cryptos, all people cared about is how much money they can potentially get out of it.
it takes abt 2 seconds to realise it's all abt the money, again. sad world
to be fair, I think nft weren't even meant to be about images strictly speaking, a token can be anything, audio, text, a file.
As an artist, this is cap
Money makes the world go round 🤷♂️
No shit it's about the money. But artists need money too so I don't see what your problem with them trying to make a living is.
Thats why its better to have tangible assets.
It just mind boggles me that there are people out there that rather spend a lifetime fortune owning an imaginary item, than to spend it where real people might actually need for housing, food, clothes etc
The human race is just crazy
As Keanu said, the problem is people wanting to own everything instead of just experiencing it, exclusivity is stupid, we as people should want to share the things we like, not hide it from others by buying it.
Did people not buy the dvd's and merch he was on for decades? That's art, and people "owned" it.
@@Ciphernacus_X but it's not exclusive, if someone buys the dvd it doesn't stop other people from watching it
Well, but human psychology don't change. Exclusivity wont disappear from the world even if we wanted to. I totally agree with you, I just see for what it is.
You can not "hide" an nft, that's the point of decentralization.
@@LDungeon you can screenshot the jpeg
Hey pewds 5:55 we're not actually laughing about screenshoting an NFT
we're laughing at the NFT owners getting triggered by it.
Up
typical right-clicker response 😌😌😜
That’s what he’s saying. He knows the joke is over pissing off NFT owners, as in “ppl who use the screenshot joke against them are lame cause it’s overdone” it’s really like saying “you just got owned!!” but in a way that’s like “deal with it libtard 😎 like and share 👍 ” at this point. It’s a recirculating joke.
No NFT owner gets triggered at that you incel
I like how these boomers created their own fantasy world where NFT owners get triggered by someone screenshotting their tokens.
This is an interesting phenomenon
that dude interviewing Keanu looks like an NFT.
Screenshottaing NFT hella funny yo. Legit the funiest thing ever. All time funniest.
I feel like a boomer who still doesn't understand the full capacity of NFT's and WHY they need to be a thing. I'm an artist and in the current moment it just seems like a load of unnecessary crap that's just being splurged out there for money. But maybe that's just my potato brain and not understanding the potential of it.
Nope, you're absolutely spot on with the understanding of the whole sham
Nah it's just stupid and a bunch of idiots have made it a big thing so they can make money and evade tax
Well, it is a simple way for a artist to prove ownership of their art. Unfortunatelly it can be used to generate scarcity, which for a capitalist means big money throught speculation.
It has nothing to do with art, it's a form of currency and money laundering.
You're not missing anything. Literally a scam for stupid people lol
My biggest problem with NFTs is that they are made to honour art and help artists....but we don't hear some individual's art which he put actual effort into sell for 1 million dollars instead we do hear a lot about ugly monkeys and no effort pixel arts to go for so so much money than their artistic value...
Money laundering and consumer fetishism. That's what it's all about
I don't think it was made to honor and help artists. I think people saw it as an opportunity but it was problematic in the beginning purely because of the environmental aspect.
Theres plenty of videos out there explaoning why art that seems to take very little.effort and is essentially what we call, ugly, is sold for exorbient amounts compared to works of art that are actually skilled and worth the effort not getting recognition. It's like the upper echeleon wants the works that take little effort to be the spotlight
If gou followed nifty gateway from about a year ago you'd see allot of stories of unknown artists making it big
It was never made to honor artists, that's the alibi the creators of this system went with.
Haven't watched Pewdiepie in months and I can honestly say that he sounds exhausted and definitely needs a break
Probably the most respectful video I have ever seen by PewDiePie.
My main problem with NFTs is how it’s become a way for people to profit rather than make and share their art, it’s literally a pyramid scheme at this point. Not to mention it’s extremely energy intensive and bad for the environment. I think it’s a cool concept but ultimately was ruined by corporations and people looking for cash.
Anything that makes money is going to be ruined by the usual capitalist suspects. Doesn’t make everything bad by proxy though
Capitalist corporations ruined something meant to be good? *surprise pikachu face*
That’s usually how everything gets ruined, unfortunately
Time to get political...
Ballz
NTFs are not art, never where, and never wanted to, i don't know why so much people think of it like that
Despite Felix's very educated explanation...
I still do not understand what exactly NFTs are and how they serve any purpose
You will in like 5 years
It's an acronym for No Fart Tuesday
@KelvinBB ratio
Resale value
Nft is proof of ownership, its like you getting a paper that you now own the mona Lisa painting. Evrryone else Will still make copies and take pictures, etc. But you Will have the paper that says you bought it and can sell it again
If you are a basketball fan, top shot is kind of a cool way to do NFTs. Basically, the NFTs are player highlights and you can crack packs, trade on the marketplace, complete challenges etc
I love how your intro changes every time.
All the artists I follow on twitter are vehemently against NFTs, but outsiders sell their shit for so much money with zero repercussions. It's the exact opposite of beneficial to artists unless you're banksy or some shit
You follow a bunch of lefties who hate whatever CNN tells them to.
@@virtualmartini Very pretentious
Those artists really should mint NFTs of their work right now, and not make them public or sell them. It will protect them from future repercussions by having bulletproof evidence it's their work.
@@thehaloofthesun7174 no, it doesn't.
@@thehaloofthesun7174 Posting your art literally anywhere online is bulletproof evidence of your ownership, since, y'know, timestamps.
You could sue the person that made an NFT of you. I don’t think they can legally sell something with your likeness on it without your permission.
Copy strike that bith lol
@@AwangKhairunnas not the same for public figures. like if I sold shirt biden's face on it, that's allowed
@@josephterrell7938 bruh pewdiepie isnt the same as joe biden 💀
@@josephterrell7938 actually it's not. you still need biden's permission.
people just don't care.
@@random_guy_from_the_internet and hes not a pedo
Gets up at 4 am .. meanwhile i go to bed that time
I love how often pewds mentions and fangirls over Keanu Reeves cuz same
Still have no idea why NFT's should exist :V
To verify ownership of digital assets
@@AlphaAestheticsLeo by destroying the environment
to sell and own artists creations.. it's like owning a painting digitally essentially
Money. Laundering.
Money laundering
I hate NFTs man. The cons far far far outweigh the pros. Grifters love them though cause it has never been easier to scam people.
There’s pros??
@@lexfiles721 yessss $$$$$$$
Youre totally right, have fun NOT making 1 million dollars. Biggest scam in history I agree. Youre right! Have fun bein broke
@@MrDrPancreas Taking the Copium...?
@@nakedstatue8517 cope with what?
The game were you could make a digital land a NFT seemed kinda cool
NFT's are the epitome of greed.
I honestly think the whole nft thing is hilarious like there’s literally not a single point to them there’s no shortage of under appreciated artists but this is just a money grab. Art has its value in more than money this is just the latest lookie here I’m rich trend.
Using NFTs to represent art ownership is retarded. The real value of them comes from the ability to transparently own and trade licenses. If the deed to your house was an NFT then you could sell it without a mediary. Same with your vehicle's title.
NFT is a lot of speculation. If you want to grasp the potential better you should try out decentraland or the sandbox game. See their 3D accessories sold as NFTs. Outfits, pets, cars... etc. Now think you could bring all the NFT accessories you have to OTHER games(that will eventually allow nft gearing up) like GTA, Sims... Basically any game. The concept of moving items across digital worlds (interoperatibility) is the Potential. Hope this helps.
@@zap5860 It doesn't, that doesn't bring any value to the game at all than just microtransactions on steroids.
@@user-tzzglsstle585e38 Also no company would invest time, work and money into bringing items from other games / companies into their own game. If boring game A dies you will never get items from that game into boring game B.
If some companies will do it be prepared to pay a heavy price (aka Microtransactions). It`s not a magic system that allows creations showing up without any effort or coding.
Also having ("owning") a weapon in GTA would not mean that it will ever at any point appear in a game like The Sims or Fifa.
It's also an easy way to write off money for laundering
Nftards: "Nft is about supporting the artists"
Also Nftards: *steals random artists artwork without their consent*
people being good
also people murders and steals 🙄odviosly there will be bad eggs
Also NFTards:
If artist doesn't want their artwork stolen, why don't they upload NFT's themselves before it's stolen? lmao, fucking leftist smh *proceeds to ramble about politics for no reason*
Very supportive, wow I can't believe it
Nice slide into politics and true nothing says NFT like conservatives defending it, like all of those farmers promoting nft in social media smh /S
@@cionm7077 idunno why I just imagined an actual farmer selling NFT's of a carrot he took a picture of.
It’s so awesome to be able to say Stan Lee and Keenu is what took down the first NFT bubble
Watching this on my old ads kindle Fire
I'm so glad someone else shared my thoughts about those ugly ape NFTs. I feel like puking every time I see one. Who looks at these and goes "Wow, art!". Every time I mention how hideous they are I get attacked by the NFT community. I love NFT art that actually looks cool and has effort put into it. I wish it was more about creating good art than just trying to make so much money. Sell your art pieces for the prices they actually deserve.
Hopefully RUclips won't take this as promoting or something and ban me (😅🤞)
@@Avaloreofc then go away
@@idrinkrawmilk554 Report him lol
@@gamin546 Ayo why are you guys reporting me what did I do!!!???
Man I hate this canceling thing all I wanted to do was suggest a singular NFT that's not even mine and this happens
Buying an NFT is the same as someone buying 100 stuffed animals from china for 10 cents each, drawing a mustache on one, and selling it for a million dollars cause they said it was "special". Except you cant screenshot a stuffed animal.
Gotta get a celebrity on board and then make all 100 stuffed animals with a slightly different mustache, and suddenly everyone wants to have their "special" item like the famous person. Easy money from idiots.
3:02 this part is gold for a YLYL video , lmao !!
Screenshot every NFT in this video.Thanks pewds
The news about the NFT, that's what I call an epic fiasco 💪
@@ohhjustmemes i hope you get none
@Chauvin Gaming you won't be screaming that when you're in hell and can't find him.
hello guys from the west, I am Russian and I am offended that our favorite channel "star captain" wants to delete the warner brothers (I could write incorrectly) because of the retelling of 3 matrix films, if you want to help, write to remove the strikes from the channel, thanks in advance
Or an epic fresco?
NFTs are another way rich people can launder money, in a more convenient way instead of real art pieces
Exactly what I thought. It's a freaking intangible thing, so it's easy to "acquire" without the hassle of transportation and having to make it look legitimate.
i love late stage capitalism 😍😍 the hoes are figuring out a way to make money off of non existent product!
Agreed, if people are willing to dump so much money for something so worthless, it has to raise questions.
the fact you made a whole episode about them counts for more than anything..
Came by to see what we were up to pewds. Thanks for my childhood your content from 2012-2015 carried me
NFTs are just overpriced stock images
You actually think this. It's hilarious.
@@virtualmartini Tell me, Mr. Martini, all of the detailed ins and outs of NFTs
I feel like NFT's are just a legitimized, socially accepted, form of investment for scammers.
Like crypto, it's an speculative market, i.e. people valuing it because they expect to get money from it.
@@tazzioboca FOMO 🤦♂️
As much as pewds hated marvel, he still condemn people using his name for NFT sh*ts. That's how much a legend Stan Lee is
NFT: Is white backround
Guru somewhere: This image is the next mona lisa
NFT completely failed to be for the artist, not even mentioning the fact that there is still a big environmental impact to be fixed
If it's the environmental impact of the energy used to run ethereum your referring too look at Hedera, it's carbon negative.
NFTs weren't created for artists nor are they limited to art or pictures.
@@ryansampey Most NFTs aren’t made off of Hedera. This is still a very environmentally damaging process
Most nfts but not all nfts. Also not all nfts are useless but most are. Many scams but at least most collectors know how to spot legit ones
@@more-or-less-it this is a reply to the argument that has been going around that "NFT is made and beneficial for artists", this isn't a statement that NFT was created for artists because I 100% do not agree with that
My distaste of NFTs can be boiled down to two main issues:
1. Art Theft
2. Lack of restrictions against generative art
It’s really just another form of trolling, in the same way as copyright and patent trolling exists. Also this sort of thing is deliberately put out there for the public to deal with and be in discomfort about.
Imagine an uproar occurs enough to the extent that media networks start to report on NFT trolls. That easily leads into legislatures writing and passing laws, but not before corporate lobbyists weigh in on laws regarding courts ruling on NFT disputes. So in regards to legal disputes and threats of lawsuits, corporate legal teams prepare themselves through having greater leverage in court. Court expenses for lengthy trials can be endured by bigger companies, where less likely is that the case with smaller parties.
In the same way copyright and patent trolling happens with the larger bidder being favored versus the smaller bidder in a broken legal system when it comes to IP disputes, NFT’s would stand to be used in similar fashion against smaller and independent people running their own businesses who could find themselves suddenly in the cross hairs of corporate entities threatening action in court. On top of corporate structures suffocating smaller and independent creators, what’s really the biggest problem is that this expands what already exists now: an algorithmic machine; People are already fighting against a machine in terms of settling content claims on RUclips’s platform. This sort of thing is even an inconvenience to corporate legal teams, like a monstrosity grown to large to really control. The transition of bureaucracy to technocracy will be a really bad experience.
"Generative art" is degenerate and short lived. Even baseball cards had more collectible value, akin to loot crates with skins in games.
@@Hibernial this is exactly why nfts exist, to prove ownership outside a legal system. So if the artist themselves use nfts, the entire situation is fixed. Nfts were designed to solve these copyright problems, which would have been problems either way. Nfts are the solution, not the cause. In the early days this may be hard to see
That's why we need checkmarks and approvals... If someone is dumb enough to buy a pdp nft without checking it's originality, I'm sorry... A guy sold the Eiffel tower, twice! Is this the fault of technology or should we blame all landmarks? No, its the people. You dislike scumbags, not NFTs
I thought there was someone behind pewdiepie for a solid 5 minutes but then realized it was a reflection
"make the nft drop as lit as possible" - stan lee
When you have a “product” whose price is based entirely on hype and not any material value, the sky is the limit - and the internet is a hype machine. It doesn’t matter at all what the “art” is because the value is in the hype, not the art. But I think you can easily predict the long term stability of this kind of hype: the internet does not have a long attention span or memory. If you bought a $10M “dat boi” NFT several years ago, holding that value is an impossibility. This is day-trading gambles, not some hodl investment situation. (and also maybe the cremation of art’s defiled corpse)
The meme may be dead, but the value doesnt really care I guess.
Your arguments also work for bitcoin and other cryptos btw - and I'd still agree
dude that makes a lot of sense
@@Ray25689 Bitcoin is a viable cryptocurrency that isn’t going anywhere. I do believe it’s very overvalued right now but NFTs are nothing more than a craze that will die hard in the coming months
Art is always based on "hype" - you don't pay for the canvas and the colors, you don't pay for the studio or the plastic it's pressed on. You pay for what people think it should be worth.
@@TomFinsterMusic But the materials are always accounted for. Unless you're talking about fine art, generally a commission's price will be dictated by the cost of the materials and the time that it will take for the artist to complete it.