He plays a horrible officer in this movie but he did a good job acting in the role. He would definitely not be the kind of person I would ever want to serve under. He had no knowledge or concept of tactics or strategy.
this is the most realistic movie ever made about combat. It puts you there in the decision process without any apologies or period-details. Jazz music and unfiltered cigarettes don't get discussed. the most experienced guy gets moved up the line and into a leadership position whether he wants it or not. If he survived so far, he moves forward again towards the enemy, with others, until he's killed and replaced by the next guy in line. The Big Red One has a similar moment when the Bangalor Pipe is pushed into the barbed wire on D-day. Guys pick numbers and move the explosive device into place exposing themselves to enemy fire until it's put under the wire. Like it or not they do this until it's there or until they all die in the attempt.
The infantry doctrines of both armies were different. Every German squad was centered around a machine gun. The MG was the main weapon of a German squad and the riflemen supported it. In the US Army it was the other way around. MGs were issued at company level (two per company in a weapons platoon). They could be attached to rifle platoons to support them but weren't an integral part. A German squad outgunned an American squad.
@@evanboyd1541 I think u give the film makers way too much credit. Disconnect between the the high command and front line troops I suspect is a feature of most wars.
WWII Lt. Colonels average age at promotion were between 24-26. Full bird Colonels averaged in their late 20s to early 30s. Civil War General Custer was 23 when promoted to Brevette General. Today's army officers vary considerably.
Well the balance would shift toward the German side if we are talking about a platoon action. Three MG42s provide a lot of firepower that is spread out. I also guess the Germans moved a bit toward that redundancy (if not toward shifting the priority from MGs to riflemen) by introducing semiautomatic and assault rifles in 1944.
Enjoyed that movie, surprised to. Compared to the optimism of June 1944, by this stage parts of the allied advance had bogged down, hurtgen forest a terrible case in point. And replacements being rushed to the front, confused and bewildered and lacking the comprehensive preparation of their earlier 1944 colleagues. Added to that some very ambitious careerist officers looking to their postwar careers, and high attrition among the forward infantry units. All in all a bad bad period in US army history, all the more reason to wonder how the average GI got through despite those conditions
This movie is my favourite WW2 movie. Literally sends shivers down my spine. Best to get your hands on an M1 and a .45 if you were there. Thank god I'll never have to live this in my time being a mechanized infantry soldier. RIP!
He just trying to spared himself ...can one imagine the situation if something goes wrong at that critical moment??? & been discovered ??? Time here means nothing is of all day eternity he scared to death & was gland the Germans finally marched on I won't blamed him.
There are actually a lot of good books about this battle and they all mention that due to steady attrition the quality of replacements was pretty poor and included a lot of rear area types who had been hastily made into riflemen and men who were really too old for front line combat. The effects of attritions are one of the main themes of this movie.
oh absolutely....there are no guarantees however, I would opt more for the Machine gun supporting the riflemen as opposed to the other way around...its more redundant and less prone to failure as your firepower is more spread out as opposed to centralized.
You are very correct SoldatenArvidsjaur23, ze Germans were still to this day one of the best, well trained, and official military forces we(the U.S.A.) have ever fought against...the German Army had much more combat experience because they had been fighting in WWII for a couple of years before we(the U.S.A.) arrived...
German might not have seen him hiding...on Normandy Beach a Heer sentry overlooked a US GI only 10 feet from his position...fear and anxiety will change your perception...even after the traumatic event.
yes, I know about the differences in the tactics. A german squad could outgun an American squad but that was heavily dependent upon the German squad being in a good position with their Machine gun in operation. While the American squad's firepower....was far more flexible and not dependent on one man, his weapon and its set up. So, I am willing to bet that more often then not, American squads outgunned German squads.
Yeah 11 Semi automatic weapons with an automatic weapon against 9 or so soldiers with bolt action rifles with one automatic weapon. The BAR is far easier to carry around than a MG-42, so the BAR squad is more flexible.
@@petloh1882 actually i think the bar and the mg34/42 are simillar in weight. Ofcourse 100round belts weight a shit ton but so does 5 bar mags. One must remember an mg34/42 could be configured as a lmg with drum mags and bipod similar to the bar and also as a hmg on a pod. They could tune the fire rate depening on what role it was supposed to fill, not to mention there are records that the mg34 was extremely accurate when used semi-auto. I'd also like to note that the mp40 was more accurate and reliable than most smgs at the time and unless i remember wrong the german platoon had more smgs than the american counterpart. But mabye i got the wrong indo
Imagine being in country for a week and your whole platoon gets wiped out. And then you have a lead a bunch of FNG clowns into the meatgrinder. Talk about having a bad day.
At this point in the war what Germany lacked in resources they made up for in experience, tenacity and willingness to fight for their "fatherland". They were also fighting, for the most part, a defensive war by now. The German soldier was the best soldier on the battlefield during WWII.
Once the war reached The Fatherland, the mob that had been driven across France had a reason to fight again. They were protecting their own soil, and fought like it.
I don’t know if it was the intent of the Director or not, but this film captures what was known as the Rupple Dupple. Ike’s biggest blunder of WW2. Basically take replacements away from their friends, split them up, and assign them to unfamiliar units. Resulted in thousands of needless deaths.
I think he was saying “our bailey bridge”. I have been through that area several times. The battle of Schmidt and Komerschied are documented in the official Army history called Three Battles and the battle across the Kall River is described in detail. The original Kall River bridge crossed the Kall next to an old mill called Mestrenger Muele. It is still there today and houses a German restaurant that is quite good. The bridge has been replaced with a stone bridge and is at the bottom of the Kall River valley. The Kall at this point is more of a stream that a river being not very wide and certainly not deep at all. The mistake the Americans made was in totally underestimating the narrowness and steep nature of the Kall Trail which leads from Vossenach down the valley, across the Kall in then back up a steep narrow trail to Komerscheid and Schmidt. Attempting to use this trail as the 28th US Infantry Division main supply route was fool-hearty and a clear indicator that the senior Army leadership had little to no understanding of the terrain and the situation our soldiers faced on the battlefield. In the end it was a fools errand to go through there and many of the senior leadership at that time would rather have forgotten the battle rather than memorializing it. It was not our Army leadeship’s proudest moments although the junior leaders, non coms and enlisted fought and died there bravely. The battle was a failure of the senior Army leadership who steered well clear of the battle area and thus made decisions that bore little resemblance to the reality on the ground. I think the movie present this clearly!
I agree. Am American and my dad served in the U.S. Navy in WWII. He served two years in the Atlantic and two years in the Pacific on a PT Boat. But I know Churchill was a murdering bastard. He set the Lusitania up to be sunk. He said a few months before that he wished the Germans would sink a American Ship to get us in WWII. If I remember correctly it was U 21. The German Captain gave the torpedo man the choice to sink it or not. The German crew knew the ship was only 11 miles from Ireland and no way would the ship sink in less than 20 minutes from one torpedo. The ship had millions of rounds of rifle ammo and Copper and aluminum power for bombs and Artillery shells. That's all they could find because in the fifties the British Depth Charged the ship for two weeks because technology was catching up to them. When the first divers arrived at the ship it was to dangerous to explore the hulk because of the Depth Charging. I believe America may have fought on the wrong side in WWl. We should have never got in that war. Churchill is also responsible for Germany building up before WWII. Churchill went on a ship building spree and it causes Hitler to over act. World war two had a bunch of evil men running their Nations. And they send the youth to die for their insanity.
I would agree, however, they never fully made the transition as those new weapons never came out late or were never standardized...but I agree they were thinking in that direction towards the end
My arguments are useless? The U.S. had a semi-auto rifle as standard issue okay? the German Gewehr 43 was a piece of shit and never saw wide use. The MP44 came out at the very end and in limited numbers. The germans never had a long range bomber...the list goes on. Look, there is no way on this green earth...that you are going to convince anybody with any historical aptitude that the U.S. was technologically inferior to the Germans. Period
@TheFreshEC Italians aren same thing as Romans and vice versa. In fact the Last Romans would be Greeks actualy haha. People "cry" about Third Reich because the powers that defeat that Major Empire are still the ones that rule the world now..
You're joking, right? You realize that the Germans invented the first Assault Rifle during WW2, right (The STG)? They also had a semi-auto rifle at the time, the Gewehr 43, which held 10 bullets per mag. They also had incredible tanks trains, cars, and other manufactured tech. Just because they used bolt action rifles doesn't put them behind the US by any means. The US still used the Springfield at the time, and the Brits still used the Lee Enfield Rifle. Your argument is worthless.
These comments are what I hate about RUclips. Too much smack talk, and not enough sticking to the issue, which is the movie. I come here looking for a good discussion about the Hurtgen Forest, and everybody is more interested in trading childish insults. So what do people think about the Hurtgen battles? I think the Hurtgen is a case study in how not to fight a battle. The American generals fell into at least two traps. The first was fighting the battle on the map without regard for the actual conditions. The second was responding to the failure of the initial attacks by committing more and more divisions into the quagmire instead of looking at the situation and coming up with alternatives.
We tend to forget that pinning a star on a person's shoulder doesn't make them any less susceptible to human flaws. It's actually pretty common, psychologically, for one to try to recover a bad investment by investing more. "Just a little farther and we will win, we cant loose after all this effort". Casinos know this phenomenon very well, and use it to good effect(I dont know if it has a name...).it is indescribably tragic, but I think that's what happened here, and I think any person can dupe themselves into this mindset if they are not careful...
@@leewilkinson6372 it didn't help that very few of those generals ever went close to the Hurtgen Forest. I first learned about this battle in college from General Gavin's memoirs from the war. The 82nd Airborne was sent into the Hurtgen after the Ardennes Offensive to do the same thing the 28th was ordered to do in this clip. Gavin went with the leading elements down the Kall River Trail to see the conditions for himself since he had already heard so much about it. The trail was impassable, disabled vehicles littered the roads or had slid into deep ravines, and many of the dead were still where they had fallen months earlier. Gavin had been in the Hurtgen for a day and already knew more about the battlefield than any of the generals ordering attacks based on what they saw on the map.
@@williama.walker2287 very true. Excellent point! I had to re read the story of Hurtgen Forest after reasingbuour post(the quick version,I'll read the book again soon..) Gavin is a fascinating character from start to finish. I'll have to see if I can find a good biography on him. I still stand by the point I was trying to make(Gavin being an exception), but now I wonder how much politics at the higher levels of command played into other leaders' perception of stakes vs potential reward balanced against blood already spilled...were they worried that backing out of the fight would get them relieved(a de facto admission of failure to plan properly)...and thanks for making me dig even deeper. Bleh! (Lolol) Thanks for nudging my lazt brain!
@@leewilkinson6372 another thing that I have read about concerning how the generals lost their heads over the Hurtgen is that when someone suggested things that any armchair general can see, such as attacking Schmidt from Lammersdorf across terrain more suitable for American weapons and tactics, they were quickly rebuffed. The Germans were in the Hurtgen, and that is where the battle would be fought. Alternatives were taboo subjects.
Nice to see a Veteran defending his country in an argument :) But, i don't mean any disrespect (tons of which i have for you) when i say that "Drieonem" is correct. Over 80% of the German forces served against Russia, outnumbered 12-1. The Germans had better weapons and training (dont argue this im begging you, its fact) and thats why they lasted 6 & 1/2 years in a war, outnumbered 18 million total, to about 61 million (the Allies). I also dont like how you're comparing modern US - (contd)
Wrong again. Read my comment 7 years later. Lol...a country that did what the US did and "only" lost 400,000. Russia attacked a Japanese position and lost 10,000 men. Show me where in the entire Pacific and over 100 D-days the US lost 10,000 in 5 days. Give you a massive clue. ..it didn't. And on Germany being all bad ass, so were the British and American and Canadian troops. They actually beat the Nazis. Maybe Hitler shouldn't have tried taking over the world.
saurkraut....:p I have no idea why europeans call you potatoes, that just sounds lame. I guess I just prefer my American way of calling you krauts und jerry's. But in all sense, it comes from Saurkraut. A very popular dish amongst German-Americans.
You chaps do realize, that on the European Front the Americans were getting the shit kicked out of them, in the same extent in which they dished it out. The Pacific fighting was also incredibly tough, but the Americans were a lot more effective on that front. In both war theatres they had air superiority and superiority in numbers, but the Germans put up one hell of a fight (especially because they actually had effective tanks).
better weapons....the U.S. infantry had a semi-automatic rifle that held 8 rounds...while the Germans were still fucking around with bolt action rifles.....this allowed the Americans to dominate a lot of firefights. so don't give us this shit that the germans were so much more advanced...because anything they had...we had too if not more.
You're right. Forget about it. The Marines would've been slammed and losses would've been massive. You silly Americans always conveniently forget the Allies. It took multiple superpowers and nations to take down Germany at the time. They fought a war on multiple fronts, and held their own for 6 years with far less Allies, resources, and men. I am not promoting Nazism/fascism in any manner, I'm simply stating that their military was clearly superior in the time frame and they deserve some credit.
Yes, the Germans were intelligent in mobilizing their army while fighting on multiple fronts. The Americans only rem'bered for the atom bombs but it was the Stalin who held the ground and made war bloody hell. At the end U.S General Eisenhower says " We fought the wrong enemy". Thus the cold war begins
um.. lets see here. Hitler's armed forces, aprox. 18 Million TOTAL, while the US and Britain (including Canada) together had over 30 Million, and Russia had about 34 Million. The French were taken over and Poland was also taken over, but they had a decent army too. Nazi Germany WITHOUT A DOUBT, and if you knew any history, had the best: training, weaponry, and technology. The best of the Nazis (over 80% of German soldiers was against Russia) and they were outnumbered 12 to ONE. They lasted 6yrs!
May I share this with you, if you don't mind? The Bible says in Ephesians 2:8-9 KJV For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: not of works, lest any man should boast. I hope you already know God for yourself, but if you don't know Him you can know Him today. Jesus suffered, bled and died to pay for your sins and mine, out of love for us! Salvation is in faith, but one must first realize that they are a lost sinner and will die and burn in hell for all eternity without Christ Once we see ourselves, all one needs to do is repent of their sins, and put their faith in God: believe with all their heart that He will forgive every sin. And ask Him to save their soul from hell with all faith and all sincerity! Believe in God and He will save you today. If you have never gone to God and repented of your sins and put your faith in Him, now is the time my friend.
Chalk it up to discipline and following orders. You have not served, so becoming an armed chair general critic is the extent of your capabilities. You have NOT earned the right to criticize any Soldier of any nation, especially the US Army.
Manning is very smart and showed his guys he knew what he was doing. But the Japenese soldiers in my opinion were much more difficult than the Germans. The germans had much better weapons. But the thing about the Germans guns, such as the MG42, it shoots so fast you can't keep it steady. But the Americans were much better trained and the Krauts were just wussies.
Кино
This movie is so under-rated!!!! Easily one of the top 5 war movies of all time!!! Its that good!
It’s overrated if you ask me. This movie sucks.
Well, its been a year and I can confirm that nobody has asked you.
As so many others have stated,this movie is totally underrated and overlooked.!.Excellent film
I never understood why Dwight Yoakam hasn't acted more, he is really quite good.
He plays a horrible officer in this movie but he did a good job acting in the role. He would definitely not be the kind of person I would ever want to serve under. He had no knowledge or concept of tactics or strategy.
One of the most unknown and underrated movies.
this is the most realistic movie ever made about combat. It puts you there in the decision process without any apologies or period-details. Jazz music and unfiltered cigarettes don't get discussed.
the most experienced guy gets moved up the line and into a leadership position whether he wants it or not.
If he survived so far, he moves forward again towards the enemy, with others, until he's killed and replaced by the next guy in line.
The Big Red One has a similar moment when the Bangalor Pipe is pushed into the barbed wire on D-day. Guys pick numbers and move the explosive device into place exposing themselves to enemy fire until it's put under the wire. Like it or not they do this until it's there or until they all die in the attempt.
The infantry doctrines of both armies were different. Every German squad was centered around a machine gun. The MG was the main weapon of a German squad and the riflemen supported it. In the US Army it was the other way around. MGs were issued at company level (two per company in a weapons platoon). They could be attached to rifle platoons to support them but weren't an integral part. A German squad outgunned an American squad.
The German Squad was best in defense, firepower over mobility while American was Nobility over Firepower
Love the map. It shows about 100 ft of road and a bridge. Straight from the props dept!
I wonder if it was meant as a metaphor for the High command’s complete lack of understanding of what was happening to the Front line troops.
@@evanboyd1541 I think u give the film makers way too much credit. Disconnect between the the high command and front line troops I suspect is a feature of most wars.
Rv4 Guy yeah probably do, considering how low budget it is.
WWII Lt. Colonels average age at promotion were between 24-26. Full bird Colonels averaged in their late 20s to early 30s. Civil War General Custer was 23 when promoted to Brevette General. Today's army officers vary considerably.
I like the Sergeant, he's a realistic thinker...
And a pragmatist, a natural leader if you will.
I see your father brought back a lot of exclamation points as souvenirs!
Love Warren ! 💪
Well the balance would shift toward the German side if we are talking about a platoon action. Three MG42s provide a lot of firepower that is spread out. I also guess the Germans moved a bit toward that redundancy (if not toward shifting the priority from MGs to riflemen) by introducing semiautomatic and assault rifles in 1944.
That map totally took me out of the scene...
Enjoyed that movie, surprised to. Compared to the optimism of June 1944, by this stage parts of the allied advance had bogged down, hurtgen forest a terrible case in point. And replacements being rushed to the front, confused and bewildered and lacking the comprehensive preparation of their earlier 1944 colleagues. Added to that some very ambitious careerist officers looking to their postwar careers, and high attrition among the forward infantry units. All in all a bad bad period in US army history, all the more reason to wonder how the average GI got through despite those conditions
This movie is my favourite WW2 movie. Literally sends shivers down my spine. Best to get your hands on an M1 and a .45 if you were there. Thank god I'll never have to live this in my time being a mechanized infantry soldier. RIP!
He just trying to spared himself ...can one imagine the situation if something goes wrong at that critical moment??? & been discovered ??? Time here means nothing is of all day eternity he scared to death & was gland the Germans finally marched on I won't blamed him.
I like this sergant, clever guy :-).
I have not seen the movie but, how does a guy that out of shape get through boot camp. Let alone, out in the field.
There are actually a lot of good books about this battle and they all mention that due to steady attrition the quality of replacements was pretty poor and included a lot of rear area types who had been hastily made into riflemen and men who were really too old for front line combat. The effects of attritions are one of the main themes of this movie.
The Germans won a victory here. And then the Ardennes offensive erased that.
Shout out to the 28th from Pennsylvania!
That slap was needed.. ..😈
That map looked like a child drew it lol
oh absolutely....there are no guarantees
however, I would opt more for the Machine gun supporting the riflemen as opposed to the other way around...its more redundant and less prone to failure as your firepower is more spread out as opposed to centralized.
Omg... i would stop breathing with those krauts next to me like that
Don't Breathe
Trumpets DON'T fade! Trumpeter FTPCC!
Lt Colonel Dwight Yokum... Lol
ooo yeah i forgot about scream 2 i remember him now
Inside ------- the pocket of a German . Do Wah Do Wah Do Wah ------- Do Wah Do Wah
also, every American squad had a BAR.
You are very correct SoldatenArvidsjaur23, ze Germans were still to this day one of the best, well trained, and official military forces we(the U.S.A.) have ever fought against...the German Army had much more combat experience because they had been fighting in WWII for a couple of years before we(the U.S.A.) arrived...
German might not have seen him hiding...on Normandy Beach a Heer sentry overlooked a US GI only 10 feet from his position...fear and anxiety will change your perception...even after the traumatic event.
Aaah Shit- I'd be bricking myself if I was in his position!!!!
Major was younger than captain ,but not bad than Private Ryan thanks for posting .(soluu huong)
Lt Colonel*
0:35 would be scary for sandy!
Captain knows Whiz kid Ike wannabe is going to get them all slaughtered!
I concur,apparently the comments shifted from being about the movie to some mother's son a few months back?
yes, I know about the differences in the tactics. A german squad could outgun an American squad but that was heavily dependent upon the German squad being in a good position with their Machine gun in operation.
While the American squad's firepower....was far more flexible and not dependent on one man, his weapon and its set up.
So, I am willing to bet that more often then not, American squads outgunned German squads.
Yeah 11 Semi automatic weapons with an automatic weapon against 9 or so soldiers with bolt action rifles with one automatic weapon. The BAR is far easier to carry around than a MG-42, so the BAR squad is more flexible.
@@petloh1882 actually i think the bar and the mg34/42 are simillar in weight. Ofcourse 100round belts weight a shit ton but so does 5 bar mags. One must remember an mg34/42 could be configured as a lmg with drum mags and bipod similar to the bar and also as a hmg on a pod. They could tune the fire rate depening on what role it was supposed to fill, not to mention there are records that the mg34 was extremely accurate when used semi-auto. I'd also like to note that the mp40 was more accurate and reliable than most smgs at the time and unless i remember wrong the german platoon had more smgs than the american counterpart. But mabye i got the wrong indo
@missionaryridge
i don't know, which one would he have rather surrendered too?
Imagine being in country for a week and your whole platoon gets wiped out. And then you have a lead a bunch of FNG clowns into the meatgrinder. Talk about having a bad day.
NO BUDY DIE.
WHAT?
COME ON MAN SAY?
NO BUDDY DIE.
COME ON TELL HER.
Dwight Yoakam lol Sling Blade
@TheFreshEC True...
Ok, how about the young boys, old men that they had to use toward the end. Cmon!
Who's they?
Well I'll be fucked. An honest Lieutenant.
"Damn, the only person who knows shit around here is.... YOU!!!"
so true ..
This Moment 1:27!!!
@druha10304 I had two relatives in the SS and one in 28th keystone during ww2 :D
@mickcod yea haha my bad... 6 million..
AKU TAU TAKTIK, KALAU DIA BERI KITA MAKANAN PANAS MESTI HARI TU JUGA KITA AKAN MULAKAN SERANGAN.
Grenade would be excellent.
i dont think ANY Deutsch squad leader would give you an easy time...
hey the captain...the actor whos playing him stared in "live free or die hard" as the crazy guy with asian gf and also "hitman" never noticed till now
never heard Arbeley Bridge before..
Fictional bridge.
At this point in the war what Germany lacked in resources they made up for in experience, tenacity and willingness to fight for their "fatherland". They were also fighting, for the most part, a defensive war by now. The German soldier was the best soldier on the battlefield during WWII.
Once the war reached The Fatherland, the mob that had been driven across France had a reason to fight again. They were protecting their own soil, and fought like it.
The comment was directed to Hawkins to avoid any confusion...
Shit that slamp hahah
7:00 - Those 3 items are intended to raise the morale in order to make the push more effective.
☠☠☠
💀💀💀
Movie had a budget of about three fifty $3.50
I don’t know if it was the intent of the Director or not, but this film captures what was known as the Rupple Dupple. Ike’s biggest blunder of WW2. Basically take replacements away from their friends, split them up, and assign them to unfamiliar units. Resulted in thousands of needless deaths.
Arbaley Bridge is a fictional bridge. Who told the lieutenant about the patrol?
I think he was saying “our bailey bridge”. I have been through that area several times. The battle of Schmidt and Komerschied are documented in the official Army history called Three Battles and the battle across the Kall River is described in detail. The original Kall River bridge crossed the Kall next to an old mill called Mestrenger Muele. It is still there today and houses a German restaurant that is quite good. The bridge has been replaced with a stone bridge and is at the bottom of the Kall River valley. The Kall at this point is more of a stream that a river being not very wide and certainly not deep at all. The mistake the Americans made was in totally underestimating the narrowness and steep nature of the Kall Trail which leads from Vossenach down the valley, across the Kall in then back up a steep narrow trail to Komerscheid and Schmidt. Attempting to use this trail as the 28th US Infantry Division main supply route was fool-hearty and a clear indicator that the senior Army leadership had little to no understanding of the terrain and the situation our soldiers faced on the battlefield. In the end it was a fools errand to go through there and many of the senior leadership at that time would rather have forgotten the battle rather than memorializing it. It was not our Army leadeship’s proudest moments although the junior leaders, non coms and enlisted fought and died there bravely. The battle was a failure of the senior Army leadership who steered well clear of the battle area and thus made decisions that bore little resemblance to the reality on the ground. I think the movie present this clearly!
Now that's one scary thing about being seperated from the sgt. squad
lmfao 7:52
@missionaryridge Many, many did hate the Germans.
@TheFreshEC The Leaders of Allies were also kinda crazy and were "bad people" aswell
I agree. Am American and my dad served in the U.S. Navy in WWII. He served two years in the Atlantic and two years in the Pacific on a PT Boat. But I know Churchill was a murdering bastard. He set the Lusitania up to be sunk. He said a few months before that he wished the Germans would sink a American Ship to get us in WWII. If I remember correctly it was U 21. The German Captain gave the torpedo man the choice to sink it or not. The German crew knew the ship was only 11 miles from Ireland and no way would the ship sink in less than 20 minutes from one torpedo. The ship had millions of rounds of rifle ammo and Copper and aluminum power for bombs and Artillery shells. That's all they could find because in the fifties the British Depth Charged the ship for two weeks because technology was catching up to them. When the first divers arrived at the ship it was to dangerous to explore the hulk because of the Depth Charging. I believe America may have fought on the wrong side in WWl. We should have never got in that war. Churchill is also responsible for Germany building up before WWII. Churchill went on a ship building spree and it causes Hitler to over act. World war two had a bunch of evil men running their Nations. And they send the youth to die for their insanity.
Great War moviec
the germans are so elegant 01:09
No smoking on patrol OTHERWISE a cigarette wasted.
Any smell can alert a enemy moving or stationary positioned in a fog of war so better to keep your shit for later
I guess it all comes down to the positions at the beggining of the engagement and some other circumstances.
I would agree, however, they never fully made the transition as those new weapons never came out late or were never standardized...but I agree they were thinking in that direction towards the end
That major looks and sounds like Dwight Yokam. Is it him?
nhiêu nguoi linh dung cam thê .nhung lai co nguoi so chêt vô cung .co rât nhiêu co hôi giêt ke thu lai ko lam
Am I the only one who thinks the German soldier with the scar under his right eye looks a little like Tom Brady?
Yes lol
Is that Lt. Col. Dwight Yokam?
That was my thought too. Spitting image.
🤠
3:00 - 3:07 wer ned hören will muss fühlen *gg*
My arguments are useless? The U.S. had a semi-auto rifle as standard issue okay? the German Gewehr 43 was a piece of shit and never saw wide use. The MP44 came out at the very end and in limited numbers. The germans never had a long range bomber...the list goes on. Look, there is no way on this green earth...that you are going to convince anybody with any historical aptitude that the U.S. was technologically inferior to the Germans. Period
@TheFreshEC Italians aren same thing as Romans and vice versa. In fact the Last Romans would be Greeks actualy haha. People "cry" about Third Reich because the powers that defeat that Major Empire are still the ones that rule the world now..
You're joking, right? You realize that the Germans invented the first Assault Rifle during WW2, right (The STG)? They also had a semi-auto rifle at the time, the Gewehr 43, which held 10 bullets per mag. They also had incredible tanks trains, cars, and other manufactured tech. Just because they used bolt action rifles doesn't put them behind the US by any means. The US still used the Springfield at the time, and the Brits still used the Lee Enfield Rifle. Your argument is worthless.
Rounds, not bullets, 🙄
33
Nice clean uniforms sorta make it lame
Is it because you have a German heritage or something like that?
Dwight Yoakam?
Yup definitely is. I was going to say the same thing.
🤠
Why do the americans for us germans always krauts??? Foreigners in Germany call us potatoes lol
These comments are what I hate about RUclips. Too much smack talk, and not enough sticking to the issue, which is the movie. I come here looking for a good discussion about the Hurtgen Forest, and everybody is more interested in trading childish insults. So what do people think about the Hurtgen battles? I think the Hurtgen is a case study in how not to fight a battle. The American generals fell into at least two traps. The first was fighting the battle on the map without regard for the actual conditions. The second was responding to the failure of the initial attacks by committing more and more divisions into the quagmire instead of looking at the situation and coming up with alternatives.
We tend to forget that pinning a star on a person's shoulder doesn't make them any less susceptible to human flaws. It's actually pretty common, psychologically, for one to try to recover a bad investment by investing more. "Just a little farther and we will win, we cant loose after all this effort". Casinos know this phenomenon very well, and use it to good effect(I dont know if it has a name...).it is indescribably tragic, but I think that's what happened here, and I think any person can dupe themselves into this mindset if they are not careful...
@@leewilkinson6372 it didn't help that very few of those generals ever went close to the Hurtgen Forest. I first learned about this battle in college from General Gavin's memoirs from the war. The 82nd Airborne was sent into the Hurtgen after the Ardennes Offensive to do the same thing the 28th was ordered to do in this clip. Gavin went with the leading elements down the Kall River Trail to see the conditions for himself since he had already heard so much about it. The trail was impassable, disabled vehicles littered the roads or had slid into deep ravines, and many of the dead were still where they had fallen months earlier. Gavin had been in the Hurtgen for a day and already knew more about the battlefield than any of the generals ordering attacks based on what they saw on the map.
@@williama.walker2287 very true. Excellent point! I had to re read the story of Hurtgen Forest after reasingbuour post(the quick version,I'll read the book again soon..) Gavin is a fascinating character from start to finish. I'll have to see if I can find a good biography on him. I still stand by the point I was trying to make(Gavin being an exception), but now I wonder how much politics at the higher levels of command played into other leaders' perception of stakes vs potential reward balanced against blood already spilled...were they worried that backing out of the fight would get them relieved(a de facto admission of failure to plan properly)...and thanks for making me dig even deeper. Bleh! (Lolol) Thanks for nudging my lazt brain!
@@leewilkinson6372 another thing that I have read about concerning how the generals lost their heads over the Hurtgen is that when someone suggested things that any armchair general can see, such as attacking Schmidt from Lammersdorf across terrain more suitable for American weapons and tactics, they were quickly rebuffed. The Germans were in the Hurtgen, and that is where the battle would be fought. Alternatives were taboo subjects.
Nice to see a Veteran defending his country in an argument :)
But, i don't mean any disrespect (tons of which i have for you) when i say that "Drieonem" is correct. Over 80% of the German forces served against Russia, outnumbered 12-1. The Germans had better weapons and training (dont argue this im begging you, its fact) and thats why they lasted 6 & 1/2 years in a war, outnumbered 18 million total, to about 61 million (the Allies). I also dont like how you're comparing modern US - (contd)
Wrong again. Read my comment 7 years later. Lol...a country that did what the US did and "only" lost 400,000. Russia attacked a Japanese position and lost 10,000 men. Show me where in the entire Pacific and over 100 D-days the US lost 10,000 in 5 days. Give you a massive clue. ..it didn't. And on Germany being all bad ass, so were the British and American and Canadian troops. They actually beat the Nazis. Maybe Hitler shouldn't have tried taking over the world.
saurkraut....:p I have no idea why europeans call you potatoes, that just sounds lame. I guess I just prefer my American way of calling you krauts und jerry's. But in all sense, it comes from Saurkraut. A very popular dish amongst German-Americans.
and the Marines were fighting the japanese in the pacific...if the Germans faced them......forget about it
people in my school call me a Nazi when a Nazi is a group, not a name of what you are... it really pissis me off
No è tradotto in italiano
03:55.. What is with that map? It look's cheap..
@gjohnsoningary kiss them then
You chaps do realize, that on the European Front the Americans were getting the shit kicked out of them, in the same extent in which they dished it out. The Pacific fighting was also incredibly tough, but the Americans were a lot more effective on that front. In both war theatres they had air superiority and superiority in numbers, but the Germans put up one hell of a fight (especially because they actually had effective tanks).
@gjohnsoningary who the f said the Germans were wussies? Ask any of the countries they took over.
better weapons....the U.S. infantry had a semi-automatic rifle that held 8 rounds...while the Germans were still fucking around with bolt action rifles.....this allowed the Americans to dominate a lot of firefights. so don't give us this shit that the germans were so much more advanced...because anything they had...we had too if not more.
You're right. Forget about it. The Marines would've been slammed and losses would've been massive. You silly Americans always conveniently forget the Allies. It took multiple superpowers and nations to take down Germany at the time. They fought a war on multiple fronts, and held their own for 6 years with far less Allies, resources, and men.
I am not promoting Nazism/fascism in any manner, I'm simply stating that their military was clearly superior in the time frame and they deserve some credit.
Yes, the Germans were intelligent in mobilizing their army while fighting on multiple fronts. The Americans only rem'bered for the atom bombs but it was the Stalin who held the ground and made war bloody hell.
At the end U.S General Eisenhower says " We fought the wrong enemy".
Thus the cold war begins
that's just inappropriate, i'm sorry they do that.
um.. lets see here. Hitler's armed forces, aprox. 18 Million TOTAL, while the US and Britain (including Canada) together had over 30 Million, and Russia had about 34 Million. The French were taken over and Poland was also taken over, but they had a decent army too. Nazi Germany WITHOUT A DOUBT, and if you knew any history, had the best: training, weaponry, and technology. The best of the Nazis (over 80% of German soldiers was against Russia) and they were outnumbered 12 to ONE. They lasted 6yrs!
N
May I share this with you, if you don't mind?
The Bible says in Ephesians 2:8-9 KJV For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: not of works, lest any man should boast.
I hope you already know God for yourself, but if you don't know Him you can know Him today.
Jesus suffered, bled and died to pay for your sins and mine, out of love for us!
Salvation is in faith, but one must first realize that they are a lost sinner and will die and burn in hell for all eternity without Christ
Once we see ourselves, all one needs to do is repent of their sins, and put their faith in God: believe with all their heart that He will forgive every sin. And ask Him to save their soul from hell with all faith and all sincerity! Believe in God and He will save you today.
If you have never gone to God and repented of your sins and put your faith in Him, now is the time my friend.
Funny! If the toughest, they sure got their asses kicked in by both the US Army, British and Russians. Good, but not good enough!
whenever germans and alies confronted each other in equal force, men power, supplies etc the germans would prevail. get it?
Not in Jewish fictional Hollywood movies 🎥!
Chalk it up to discipline and following orders. You have not served, so becoming an armed chair general critic is the extent of your capabilities. You have NOT earned the right to criticize any Soldier of any nation, especially the US Army.
Manning is very smart and showed his guys he knew what he was doing. But the Japenese soldiers in my opinion were much more difficult than the Germans. The germans had much better weapons. But the thing about the Germans guns, such as the MG42, it shoots so fast you can't keep it steady. But the Americans were much better trained and the Krauts were just wussies.