These subtypes are silly. They may relate to particular affective ranges INTPs possess but they have no business producing distinct subtypes unless they can be shown to play a role in the mechanics of cognitive functions.
@@hestias1flame Sure, but then the mechanics need to be explained. I highly doubt OPS does this because their system lacks a mechanical architecture. There is nothing to place this into. Their cognitive function definitions are vague (and inaccurate), and their system allows things like 'jumpers' because they don't explain why the stack is ordered the way it is to begin with. They validate each new subtype by testing whether 2 separate testers can type someone the same. It's circular, and it's why they're in this 512 subtype mess that they cannot justify or dig themselves out of. They just don't do typology right. Edit: it appears this is a slightly different theory, which I will look into, but for now I'll say the same applies.
I haven't done a full deep dive on his model yet so I will reserve my judgement until then but Dario Nardi has been in the community since the 80's and that is impressive@@hestias1flame
![Gunna - HIM ALL ALONG [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/w7Wf0h1Q8a4/mqdefault.jpg)
are u a vampire
I recommend using an ai voice generator (text to speech) if you're struggling with talking on camera.
wtf lmao?
@@ad3l bro I literally can't hear shit
Sunshine and Exercise = Antidepressant 😊 This video’s audio is too soft .
These subtypes are silly. They may relate to particular affective ranges INTPs possess but they have no business producing distinct subtypes unless they can be shown to play a role in the mechanics of cognitive functions.
They all have a direct affect on the cognitive functions and have been shown to do so.
@@hestias1flame Sure, but then the mechanics need to be explained. I highly doubt OPS does this because their system lacks a mechanical architecture. There is nothing to place this into. Their cognitive function definitions are vague (and inaccurate), and their system allows things like 'jumpers' because they don't explain why the stack is ordered the way it is to begin with. They validate each new subtype by testing whether 2 separate testers can type someone the same. It's circular, and it's why they're in this 512 subtype mess that they cannot justify or dig themselves out of. They just don't do typology right.
Edit: it appears this is a slightly different theory, which I will look into, but for now I'll say the same applies.
I haven't done a full deep dive on his model yet so I will reserve my judgement until then but Dario Nardi has been in the community since the 80's and that is impressive@@hestias1flame
You should probably join the discord btw: discord.gg/BTryWr55@@hestias1flame
What are you saying? I can't hear you! Just use an AI voice generator.