As a visual artist this is how I felt the first time I saw the videos and results of Dalle 2. This this is the midjourney V4 moment for music. This same moment will come for video games and film soon enough. Thanos is gathering all the ai gems of creativity. Then snap. A whole new world.
It’s only impressive because the humans whose works it was trained on (without their permission and without paying them) are highly skilled people who worked hard to create their art. It’s literally nothing without these artists. And the whole thing collapses once artists fully realize this and also fully realize their power... Artists, from here on out, let’s go on a modified data strike that should make everyone, and I do mean everyone, happy. CREATE NOTHING NEW. Until we are adequately protected, let’s take remix culture to its most extreme ends. The pro-AI “art” community has told us repeatedly that there is no such thing as originality, everything is derivative, etc. They clearly believe we’ve reached the limits of human creativity and somehow feel qualified to tell us that art has become “stagnant.” (Never mind that these art whisperers include the same tech moguls who have fed the masses mediocre art through algorithms for decades.) Let’s not fight this strange alliance between billionaire tech moguls who are somehow suddenly democratizers and everyday people who believe themselves to be decent (or even progressive) but have no qualms about stealing from artists, including the majority of whom are poor or middle class. Let’s instead carry out their self-serving logic to its ridiculous end. Let’s turn the other cheek by doing what they’ve told us to do so many times: Be closer to their definition of “creative” and “adapt” as they have. Until artists are adequately protected and AI companies and grifters cannot scrape copyrighted works without artists’ consent and without crediting and fairly compensating each artist, stop feeding the machine. Use your advantage, which is skill. Make friends with and collaborate with other human artists who are against us being exploited to train generative AI. (This may be the time when you find out who your real friends are. Collective suffering brings oppressed people together. Unite.) Create remixes of each others’ works. Remix the remixes, too. And so on. These will be protected by copyright while AI outputs are not. Your skill will enable you to do this somewhat efficiently, and you will be less attached to these creations than you would be to the work you “dared” to call original. That said, never stop working on art that you truly love even if you don’t release it or only share it in special circumstances where the cost-benefit analysis makes sense. If you like creating original art, this kind of data strike means you may have to do some work you do not love (derivative work) but it will still be art (you will still probably like and enjoy it) and not a day job you hate. If you want to use AI (as you are constantly told you should) to ensure that you stay on top of the tech or to reduce the amount of original, human work available for corporations to scrape (and thereby contribute to the logical consequences of AI feeding itself its own ****), there are ethical models. (See Fairly Trained.) Also, keep pressuring your elected representatives to end to this madness.
I stumbled into UDIO about 2 hours after beta launched by accident. I have averages 16 hours per day exploring it since then, trying to figure out prompts, figuring out what works to generate cohesive longer songs. Mindblowing.
MIND = BLOWN. I was able to input songs that have been stuck in my head forever and get different variations to choose from! Definitely a game changer.
The sampling and inspiration from this is the best thing for me. I be tired AF after a 11 hour shift and don't feel like sifting through samples. Instead, I can think of what type of track I want and have the little push I need for inspiration. Makes it very easy to get to work on production from there.
Is not correct. If the tool accidentally creates something that already exists, you have a big problem with the copyright of the original. Udio hardly knows 1% of the existing music and cannot check whether it creates duplicates from other tools.
@@mdoerkse We have already been able to generate plagiarism. We professionally digitize old master tapes and vinyl from year 1900 to 2000 and receive original copies of old songs. Sorry. Even a song from 1975 by one of our artists was originally plagiarized. The original was notarized. This AI is a copyright infringement machine.
Yes - and in just two years no one will care anymore if millions of songs are released every day. Who wants to hear that? This creates a total oversupply.
I definitely have been using it for a couple of days now to make my own sample library. The best part is that I can make instrumentals OR write the lyrics and have it sing it and it's a straight exclusive sample that sounds like it was from that era.
I hear you, bro. You’re on the same page as me. I’ve been waiting for this all my life. I don’t know if it’s there yet, but the icing on the cake would be if I could input my own chord progressions and lyrics. Wow! I’ve been playing around with Suno, which is good, but the sound quality was a bit off. But I’m sure they are going to improve and give you WAV files instead of MP3s. We’re living in crazy times with AI. Bless 🙏🏾
What a joy to have AI replace a lot of the boring parts of making music. For me making music has always been about finding those nuggets by listening for something cool. Same process with AI music creation but way faster. I'm having a blast right now!
The fact that so many people are okay with this is what's blowing my mind. This is screaming. "I'm lazy and don't want to learn anything for myself or collaborate with other humans because I'm addicted to immediate gratification and have no interest in art for its unique self-expression." In this regard everyone who is on board with this might as well just start letting A.I. live for them and they can just sit in a chair and be a body bag with no need to experience REAL LIFE or any form of self-agency and be controlled by an A.I. mainframe that governs their choices and movements for them. . . Welcome to dystopia. . .
That's one side of the coin, but let me ask you to also consider this: This allows creation at unparalleled levels. In fact, the opposite of laziness. People with visions that would have taken them decades to manifest now can bring them to fruition in a fraction of the time, allowing for increased productivity and output. If you want to learn how to play a musical instruments, or sing, or whatever it may be, by all means, please go forth and improve yourself, but be cautious assuming that is a more righteous creative endeavor than the one who now builds entire brands, IPs, worlds, and experiences for people via AI tools which also bring value to the people whom resonate with it.
Artists, from here on out, let’s go on a modified data strike that should make everyone, and I do mean everyone, happy. CREATE NOTHING NEW. Until we are adequately protected, let’s take remix culture to its most extreme ends. The pro-AI “art” community has told us repeatedly that there is no such thing as originality, everything is derivative, etc. They clearly believe we’ve reached the limits of human creativity and somehow feel qualified to tell us that art has become “stagnant.” (Never mind that these art whisperers include the same tech moguls who have fed the masses mediocre art through algorithms for decades.) Let’s not fight this strange alliance between billionaire tech moguls who are somehow suddenly democratizers and everyday people who believe themselves to be decent (or even progressive) but have no qualms about stealing from artists, including the majority of whom are poor or middle class. Let’s instead carry out their self-serving logic to its ridiculous end. Let’s turn the other cheek by doing what they’ve told us to do so many times: Be closer to their definition of “creative” and “adapt” as they have. Until artists are adequately protected and AI companies and grifters cannot scrape copyrighted works without artists’ consent and without crediting and fairly compensating each artist, stop feeding the machine. Use your advantage, which is skill. Make friends with and collaborate with other human artists who are against us being exploited to train generative AI. (This may be the time when you find out who your real friends are. Collective suffering brings oppressed people together. Unite.) Create remixes of each others’ works. Remix the remixes, too. And so on. These will be protected by copyright while AI outputs are not. Your skill will enable you to do this somewhat efficiently, and you will be less attached to these creations than you would be to the work you “dared” to call original. That said, never stop working on art that you truly love even if you don’t release it or only share it in special circumstances where the cost-benefit analysis makes sense. If you like creating original art, this kind of data strike means you may have to do some work you do not love (derivative work) but it will still be art (you will still probably like and enjoy it) and not a day job you hate. If you want to use AI (as you are constantly told you should) to ensure that you stay on top of the tech or to reduce the amount of original, human work available for corporations to scrape (and thereby contribute to the logical consequences of AI feeding itself its own ****), there are ethical models. (See Fairly Trained.) Also, keep pressuring your elected representatives to end to this madness.
Fans prefer an emotional connection to real artists. We are probably going to need two separate charts on spotify, napster, youtube and other streaming services... One for real artists and one for A.I.. .
I agree that the fans want an emotional connection, but what happens when EVERYONE can use this tool to make songs. What even is an artist at that point. How will it be possible to stand out when everyone can be as good as drake
I love it!!! I don’t care about the business side of this program but what I did love about it is that it helped me make a song about a dog I had that passed away and it made me a personalized song g about my dog that my family can listen to and keep his memory around…I also had it make me and my little girls a song about cleaning our room and house that we can play while we clean the house…can’t say how much I love this and thank you for this program…I hope this channel can keep pushing this, much love
Yeah it can make instrumentals, so in a couple of years/months you could just pay a subscription to get like 1200 free "custom" made beats/instrumentals as a artist.
This is incredible! Could unlock things for people struggling to find the right sounds. Imagine in a few years this is running on our local computers for free. it's going to happen!
someone recently posted that they wanted AI to be doing their laundry and other chores, so they could have time to create art...not the other way around.
I feel like this is the death of music. The next project like this will just make hip hop beats and then everybody that listens to your channel will be out of business and as will you eventually.
Soon you will be able to listen to music in real time that adapts to your circumstance and mood. We were never more in interactive contact with music, but the only thing you can see is the little tree stuck to your nose.
Artists, from here on out, let’s go on a modified data strike that should make everyone, and I do mean everyone, happy. CREATE NOTHING NEW. Until we are adequately protected, let’s take remix culture to its most extreme ends. The pro-AI “art” community has told us repeatedly that there is no such thing as originality, everything is derivative, etc. They clearly believe we’ve reached the limits of human creativity and somehow feel qualified to tell us that art has become “stagnant.” (Never mind that these art whisperers include the same tech moguls who have fed the masses mediocre art through algorithms for decades.) Let’s not fight this strange alliance between billionaire tech moguls who are somehow suddenly democratizers and everyday people who believe themselves to be decent (or even progressive) but have no qualms about stealing from artists, including the majority of whom are poor or middle class. Let’s instead carry out their self-serving logic to its ridiculous end. Let’s turn the other cheek by doing what they’ve told us to do so many times: Be closer to their definition of “creative” and “adapt” as they have. Until artists are adequately protected and AI companies and grifters cannot scrape copyrighted works without artists’ consent and without crediting and fairly compensating each artist, stop feeding the machine. Use your advantage, which is skill. Make friends with and collaborate with other human artists who are against us being exploited to train generative AI. (This may be the time when you find out who your real friends are. Collective suffering brings oppressed people together. Unite.) Create remixes of each others’ works. Remix the remixes, too. And so on. These will be protected by copyright while AI outputs are not. Your skill will enable you to do this somewhat efficiently, and you will be less attached to these creations than you would be to the work you “dared” to call original. That said, never stop working on art that you truly love even if you don’t release it or only share it in special circumstances where the cost-benefit analysis makes sense. If you like creating original art, this kind of data strike means you may have to do some work you do not love (derivative work) but it will still be art (you will still probably like and enjoy it) and not a day job you hate. If you want to use AI (as you are constantly told you should) to ensure that you stay on top of the tech or to reduce the amount of original, human work available for corporations to scrape (and thereby contribute to the logical consequences of AI feeding itself its own ****), there are ethical models. (See Fairly Trained.) Also, keep pressuring your elected representatives to end to this madness.
Tried the latest AI generator for music Udio. Please, don't use it and don't help its learning process. It's scary good and the musicians are the people who should avoid it. Just play your damn real instrument and practice! At the moment it gives too high a premium for mere numbers. There’s only one real evil in the world: mediocrity. Soon you will regret it Peace and love! p.s It generated almost identical song and style of playing, as the greatest Satriani!
Guess there's no longer need for humans that learn to make analog musical sound using skill, passion, and emotion, and CREATIVITY. Same goes for visual Artists. Isn't a solar flare heading this way?
This is UNREAL! I've been producing music for over 30 years now. Just played around with Udio.. and the results are MIND BLOWING! It's kind of a pitty that we only get 30 seconds. But if this beast ramps up to at least 3 minutes? Geeee! Not sure how the whole licensing part works. You can't copyright AI generated music. Still ... The results are STAGGERING!
In the dystopian world of George Orwell’s 1984, there is a machine called a “versificator.” The versificator makes what might be called “fake” music-songs that are “composed without any human intervention whatever.” In April of 2016, “A New Rembrandt” was revealed (1). The painting, like the songs of a versificator, was made by machines. In August of 2016, Music Business Worldwide (2) accused Spotify of “creating fake artists.” What is a fake artist? Can music be fake? The world of 1984 is a grim place. Members of the “Party” have access to resources based on their rank. The rest of society are called “Proles.” The term is short for the “proletarian” and refers to the working class. The Proles make up the majority of society, and so the Party provides them with various sources of entertainment to keep them from getting too restless.
@@Gruziller When people stop being creative because AI can do it better we are doomed. Being creative is humans greatest trait. We will become slugs and go extinct. The AI music seems troubling but it is nothing compared to artificial intelligence and robots taking everyone's jobs. They will easily be able to herd us up like cattle for the slaughter.
it will be, probably within weeks. This stuff evolves exponentially. There will be zero need for human creativity in music within 2 years. Maybe less time.
As a solo game developer this might be the thing I need. I would love to hire someone to make some music, but I just have no budget for it. And this seems good enough.
amazing stuff, , Suno i've been using for the last couple weeks and i think has the edge on genres - but , i'm sure that's gonna change in another week or 2
What im most intrigued by is how this will effect tracklib and sampling as a whole. Sampling has provided so much of a bag for greedy labels and this now coming up in the market, the more we use a tool like this, the less leverage they have, and maybe theyll actually start to loosen the fuck up and allow up and coming producers to remix their art and split compensation instead of wanting the whole pie.
I agree to the greed thing, I also see it as paying dues to our OGs by sampling them. Essentially making them a part of our success! But, if that was gatekept , then now we see what happens when the OGs don’t embrace the younger talent.
yall so focused on "soul samples" bro there is so much music that has NOTHING to do with chopping samples (which I do chop samples all the time) but the positives of that do not outweigh the negatives.
This will separate the wheat for the husk. People with GENUINE musical ears will excel, leaving even accomplished musicians in the dust. Music is deeper than mere instruments. Udio! Let’s go!
My mouth was agape when I heard the demonic screechings and barely familiar instruments of OpenAI jukebox just a few years ago. Music generation has a come a long long way since then.
I’ve seen something like this before where someone would describe the music they want to hear, and the AI would generate it. It couldn’t sing, though. And it was mainly short clips, but this is awesome. The thing can sing for you!
It's been to where for about 4 yrs you could even hum the tone of lyrics and set the tempo and could make a beat off the tone and there's an insane amount of tech available that can greatly assist in the writing process and making beats, or just in music all together as long as it's used right.
Yo bro i have been using for a few weeks now its blown my mind too! i made a parady song about Jada smith dancing in her dressing gown! the chorus sounds so much like Nate Dogg i got emotional lol :'( RIP! but is it a non commercial license on udio? id prefer to use for sampling! but making jingles / intros for social media stuff? im too scared even to strip a drum loop out of a beat! Keep up the grind brother
To be honest, just looking at it, l think it's a branch off from Suno. Just like they are going after AI on what the models are trained on, they are trying to force the developer to disclose materials used to train the models. So that the artist can cash in.
A new shift in creative roles, we’ll be become Executive producers with the curators hat 🎩 . Quality control of the mixes should be the a key focus. I like the extend feature that shapes the ideas into full songs. And there will be song referencing and stems available in the future. The vocal fluidity and comprehension is on point with the instrumentation. I’ve been in Motown / Stax world . Mind blowing 🤯
Forget what you know about music because Udio AI is changing the game! It's like having Beethoven and Einstein team up to create the ultimate symphony. 😮🔥🔥🔥
Damn, I've been grinding so hard lately this year to learn how to produce and make music, is it even worth it to continue to learn and make music now in a 'traditional' sense? Can this tool render like stems out per say like if you were like '808' basslines in the key of something would it make that? so it's basically like chat GPT for making music?
Let’s be honest, AI can make music better than most, including myself in some genres. Some 14 yr olds can wipe grown men clean in beat battles But that’s not what makes music a business, it’s more than talent. It’s story and connection + sounds
this thing is incredible. I wonder how much subscription will cost, but it's already quite usable and fun, and really liking the music I'm getting out of it
@@TallicaMan1986 its all how you look at it. Anyone with no skill or talent can tell this thing how to make a beat and it will do it for you. Why pay a producer when An artist can download this for free and make a beat himself in seconds. This technology is only going to get better. Making money as a producer in the traditional way is coming to an end.
@@Chopping-it-up yeah that's fine if you like Fast food. There is art out there beyond just generic basics. Ai to be able to lay out how it feels through music has a long way too go. It's cool and I'm Pro Ai. Humans are more crafty then you give them credit for. Artists will pull through using this tech.
@@TallicaMan1986 The thing is many people like fast food. And it makes more money than real restaurants. Same thing with this its gonna get better and there will be no need for an artist to buy a beat when they can tell a free software to make them a beat that sounds like a real producer made it. The quality of music today is nothing like it was years ago. Because people with no skill or talent have found away in the business. With this its gonna be even more people that suck making music. I mean it even creates vocals no need for an artist or producer anyone can now just tell this thing to make an album.
It’s entirely within artists’ powers to stop this. We control the supply. Artists, from here on out, let’s go on a modified data strike that should make everyone, and I do mean everyone, happy. CREATE NOTHING NEW. Until we are adequately protected, let’s take remix culture to its most extreme ends. The pro-AI “art” community has told us repeatedly that there is no such thing as originality, everything is derivative, etc. They clearly believe we’ve reached the limits of human creativity and somehow feel qualified to tell us that art has become “stagnant.” (Never mind that these art whisperers include the same tech moguls who have fed the masses mediocre art through algorithms for decades.) Let’s not fight this strange alliance between billionaire tech moguls who are somehow suddenly democratizers and everyday people who believe themselves to be decent (or even progressive) but have no qualms about stealing from artists, including the majority of whom are poor or middle class. Let’s instead carry out their self-serving logic to its ridiculous end. Let’s turn the other cheek by doing what they’ve told us to do so many times: Be closer to their definition of “creative” and “adapt” as they have. Until artists are adequately protected and AI companies and grifters cannot scrape copyrighted works without artists’ consent and without crediting and fairly compensating each artist, stop feeding the machine. Use your advantage, which is skill. Make friends with and collaborate with other human artists who are against us being exploited to train generative AI. (This may be the time when you find out who your real friends are. Collective suffering brings oppressed people together. Unite.) Create remixes of each others’ works. Remix the remixes, too. And so on. These will be protected by copyright while AI outputs are not. Your skill will enable you to do this somewhat efficiently, and you will be less attached to these creations than you would be to the work you “dared” to call original. That said, never stop working on art that you truly love even if you don’t release it or only share it in special circumstances where the cost-benefit analysis makes sense. If you like creating original art, this kind of data strike means you may have to do some work you do not love (derivative work) but it will still be art (you will still probably like and enjoy it) and not a day job you hate. If you want to use AI (as you are constantly told you should) to ensure that you stay on top of the tech or to reduce the amount of original, human work available for corporations to scrape (and thereby contribute to the logical consequences of AI feeding itself its own ****), there are ethical models. (See Fairly Trained.) Also, keep pressuring your elected representatives to end to this madness.
@@busyworksbeats with how fast AI is moving their should be a cloud daw pretty soon that has an AI music generator. You could have the ability to upload your own reference tracks for the AI to create something similar. It's going to be very interesting.
@@NorthgateLP I hope other companies notice free software adopting AI before them. I use Maschine and haven't touched it in two weeks since Suno updated to V3
Think about this...Udio to Audacity using the OpenVINO AI plugin and make stems for the tracks. Then chop and screw and sample those tracks!! Like he said...infinite samples!!!!
Everyone thinks - "Oh, what a nice tool! It replaces 'x' in my creative process" What it's really doing - It's replacing YOU in the creative process. The case of replacing the need to pay for things like stock sounds is interesting because it's true. But what is so bothersome is that these AI tools aren't creating anything new BESIDES replacing human work. That part-time producer who was earning some extra cash making samples? Donezoo. We as music producers should be able to differentiate between "GOOD" AI tools that can unlock **NEW** creative processes vs. predatory ones that seek to marginalize other creatives. Anyone who respects the craft of music production should be outraged. Do you truly feel attached, fulfilled or expressed when you type some words into a prompt? Or are these tools simply designed to rob us of the very essence of the craft - the process itself.
I agree. Also, I think most of those excited are not musicians. Those who say they are rarely provide any examples of music they created before AI to back up their claim. Anyway, as long as you’re the source upon which the whole system is dependent, you have the power. Artists, from here on out, let’s go on a modified data strike that should make everyone, and I do mean everyone, happy. CREATE NOTHING NEW. Until we are adequately protected, let’s take remix culture to its most extreme ends. The pro-AI “art” community has told us repeatedly that there is no such thing as originality, everything is derivative, etc. They clearly believe we’ve reached the limits of human creativity and somehow feel qualified to tell us that art has become “stagnant.” (Never mind that these art whisperers include the same tech moguls who have fed the masses mediocre art through algorithms for decades.) Let’s not fight this strange alliance between billionaire tech moguls who are somehow suddenly democratizers and everyday people who believe themselves to be decent (or even progressive) but have no qualms about stealing from artists, including the majority of whom are poor or middle class. Let’s instead carry out their self-serving logic to its ridiculous end. Let’s turn the other cheek by doing what they’ve told us to do so many times: Be closer to their definition of “creative” and “adapt” as they have. Until artists are adequately protected and AI companies and grifters cannot scrape copyrighted works without artists’ consent and without crediting and fairly compensating each artist, stop feeding the machine. Use your advantage, which is skill. Make friends with and collaborate with other human artists who are against us being exploited to train generative AI. (This may be the time when you find out who your real friends are. Collective suffering brings oppressed people together. Unite.) Create remixes of each others’ works. Remix the remixes, too. And so on. These will be protected by copyright while AI outputs are not. Your skill will enable you to do this somewhat efficiently, and you will be less attached to these creations than you would be to the work you “dared” to call original. That said, never stop working on art that you truly love even if you don’t release it or only share it in special circumstances where the cost-benefit analysis makes sense. If you like creating original art, this kind of data strike means you may have to do some work you do not love (derivative work) but it will still be art (you will still probably like and enjoy it) and not a day job you hate. If you want to use AI (as you are constantly told you should) to ensure that you stay on top of the tech or to reduce the amount of original, human work available for corporations to scrape (and thereby contribute to the logical consequences of AI feeding itself its own ****), there are ethical models. (See Fairly Trained.) Also, keep pressuring your elected representatives to end to this madness.
This is 💯🔥My only question is copyright too! A friend of mine told me about this so it would help me finish my unfinished songs. Do you think this could help singer- songwriter too?
The examples still sound mediocre to me. However, it will be used by content creators who want to have a little more influence on their background beats without having any idea how to produce them. I would still recommend them to use loop-based production. The loops offer the craftsmanship of professional musicians for free. This will always be an advantage for the final result because of the human-creative aspects involved.
17:03 - 17:30 I'm linking this 27s to anyone who says AI has no soul. I'm 46 and grew up as a musician in black southern baptist churches as a musician for over 30 years. I love music, I listen to everything from The Beatles, to RHCP, to Bootsy, to Victor Wooten, to Thomas Prigden, to Heltah Skeltah, to AC/DC, to Buckethead, to Method Man, to Nirvana, to R.L. Burnside, to Jimi Hendrix...let's just say I love good music. And the aforementioned 27s, was some of the best music I've ever had the pleasure to hear. AI has just made me a believer. Soulless? Hell naw! This AI is definitely invited to the cookout.
I wonder how the copyright and commercial use works, I'm sure many people want to use this for Lyrics and flows, but want to sing it themselves etc, this is very promising though
this is beta, just the test dummy. Not even version 1.... wait for version 3 it will be more creative than any human could ever be and mixed/mastered better than any real human.
I cannot emphasize enough how mind blowing this is guys, I'm literally still in shock!
thanks Busy im trying it now 8)
It’s incredible for sure Game!
As a visual artist this is how I felt the first time I saw the videos and results of Dalle 2. This this is the midjourney V4 moment for music. This same moment will come for video games and film soon enough. Thanos is gathering all the ai gems of creativity. Then snap. A whole new world.
It’s only impressive because the humans whose works it was trained on (without their permission and without paying them) are highly skilled people who worked hard to create their art. It’s literally nothing without these artists. And the whole thing collapses once artists fully realize this and also fully realize their power... Artists, from here on out, let’s go on a modified data strike that should make everyone, and I do mean everyone, happy. CREATE NOTHING NEW. Until we are adequately protected, let’s take remix culture to its most extreme ends. The pro-AI “art” community has told us repeatedly that there is no such thing as originality, everything is derivative, etc. They clearly believe we’ve reached the limits of human creativity and somehow feel qualified to tell us that art has become “stagnant.” (Never mind that these art whisperers include the same tech moguls who have fed the masses mediocre art through algorithms for decades.) Let’s not fight this strange alliance between billionaire tech moguls who are somehow suddenly democratizers and everyday people who believe themselves to be decent (or even progressive) but have no qualms about stealing from artists, including the majority of whom are poor or middle class. Let’s instead carry out their self-serving logic to its ridiculous end. Let’s turn the other cheek by doing what they’ve told us to do so many times: Be closer to their definition of “creative” and “adapt” as they have. Until artists are adequately protected and AI companies and grifters cannot scrape copyrighted works without artists’ consent and without crediting and fairly compensating each artist, stop feeding the machine. Use your advantage, which is skill. Make friends with and collaborate with other human artists who are against us being exploited to train generative AI. (This may be the time when you find out who your real friends are. Collective suffering brings oppressed people together. Unite.) Create remixes of each others’ works. Remix the remixes, too. And so on. These will be protected by copyright while AI outputs are not. Your skill will enable you to do this somewhat efficiently, and you will be less attached to these creations than you would be to the work you “dared” to call original. That said, never stop working on art that you truly love even if you don’t release it or only share it in special circumstances where the cost-benefit analysis makes sense. If you like creating original art, this kind of data strike means you may have to do some work you do not love (derivative work) but it will still be art (you will still probably like and enjoy it) and not a day job you hate. If you want to use AI (as you are constantly told you should) to ensure that you stay on top of the tech or to reduce the amount of original, human work available for corporations to scrape (and thereby contribute to the logical consequences of AI feeding itself its own ****), there are ethical models. (See Fairly Trained.) Also, keep pressuring your elected representatives to end to this madness.
I stumbled into UDIO about 2 hours after beta launched by accident. I have averages 16 hours per day exploring it since then, trying to figure out prompts, figuring out what works to generate cohesive longer songs. Mindblowing.
MIND = BLOWN. I was able to input songs that have been stuck in my head forever and get different variations to choose from! Definitely a game changer.
It's U.N.R.E.A.L.!
How did you input already existing songs?
LOL
@@Divio18 I imported old lyrics and let udio do its magic
You goof AI will make you unnecessary!
The sampling and inspiration from this is the best thing for me. I be tired AF after a 11 hour shift and don't feel like sifting through samples. Instead, I can think of what type of track I want and have the little push I need for inspiration. Makes it very easy to get to work on production from there.
U don’t get it. No one will give a shit about your songs or rap in a few month because of AI.
This is also going to be huge for content creators, no more worrying about licensing.
@@witte_reus 🙄🙄😌
@soulspinproject This is what people are not understanding. All content creation is disintergrating before our eyes.
Is not correct. If the tool accidentally creates something that already exists, you have a big problem with the copyright of the original. Udio hardly knows 1% of the existing music and cannot check whether it creates duplicates from other tools.
@@thomashambrecht6435 It is statistically impossible for generative AI to create something that already exists.
@@mdoerkse We have already been able to generate plagiarism. We professionally digitize old master tapes and vinyl from year 1900 to 2000 and receive original copies of old songs. Sorry. Even a song from 1975 by one of our artists was originally plagiarized. The original was notarized. This AI is a copyright infringement machine.
It's impressive, but personally, I feel the high-end frequencies still sound too low-res like MP3, but we're making progress.
What you a soundiogies 😂 6:37
Rememer today is the worst that this platform will ever be
@@JB-1981 Yes, it's just the V1 version, so it will surely improve as AI technology is evolving rapidly.
Cope
For now
This and Suno will replace 50% of music libraries in the next year!!
These are amazing
In the next month shiiid...
50 % 😂
Yes - and in just two years no one will care anymore if millions of songs are released every day. Who wants to hear that? This creates a total oversupply.
You say that like it's a good thing
I definitely have been using it for a couple of days now to make my own sample library. The best part is that I can make instrumentals OR write the lyrics and have it sing it and it's a straight exclusive sample that sounds like it was from that era.
You can write lyrics and have it sing the words for you? Tempo as well?
I hear you, bro. You’re on the same page as me. I’ve been waiting for this all my life. I don’t know if it’s there yet, but the icing on the cake would be if I could input my own chord progressions and lyrics. Wow! I’ve been playing around with Suno, which is good, but the sound quality was a bit off. But I’m sure they are going to improve and give you WAV files instead of MP3s. We’re living in crazy times with AI. Bless 🙏🏾
I mean it even hits harmonies and adlibs! This shytt is NUTS
What a joy to have AI replace a lot of the boring parts of making music. For me making music has always been about finding those nuggets by listening for something cool. Same process with AI music creation but way faster. I'm having a blast right now!
The fact that so many people are okay with this is what's blowing my mind. This is screaming. "I'm lazy and don't want to learn anything for myself or collaborate with other humans because I'm addicted to immediate gratification and have no interest in art for its unique self-expression." In this regard everyone who is on board with this might as well just start letting A.I. live for them and they can just sit in a chair and be a body bag with no need to experience REAL LIFE or any form of self-agency and be controlled by an A.I. mainframe that governs their choices and movements for them. . . Welcome to dystopia. . .
but to some , that is utopia
That's one side of the coin, but let me ask you to also consider this: This allows creation at unparalleled levels. In fact, the opposite of laziness. People with visions that would have taken them decades to manifest now can bring them to fruition in a fraction of the time, allowing for increased productivity and output. If you want to learn how to play a musical instruments, or sing, or whatever it may be, by all means, please go forth and improve yourself, but be cautious assuming that is a more righteous creative endeavor than the one who now builds entire brands, IPs, worlds, and experiences for people via AI tools which also bring value to the people whom resonate with it.
U mad?
Artists, from here on out, let’s go on a modified data strike that should make everyone, and I do mean everyone, happy. CREATE NOTHING NEW. Until we are adequately protected, let’s take remix culture to its most extreme ends. The pro-AI “art” community has told us repeatedly that there is no such thing as originality, everything is derivative, etc. They clearly believe we’ve reached the limits of human creativity and somehow feel qualified to tell us that art has become “stagnant.” (Never mind that these art whisperers include the same tech moguls who have fed the masses mediocre art through algorithms for decades.) Let’s not fight this strange alliance between billionaire tech moguls who are somehow suddenly democratizers and everyday people who believe themselves to be decent (or even progressive) but have no qualms about stealing from artists, including the majority of whom are poor or middle class. Let’s instead carry out their self-serving logic to its ridiculous end. Let’s turn the other cheek by doing what they’ve told us to do so many times: Be closer to their definition of “creative” and “adapt” as they have. Until artists are adequately protected and AI companies and grifters cannot scrape copyrighted works without artists’ consent and without crediting and fairly compensating each artist, stop feeding the machine. Use your advantage, which is skill. Make friends with and collaborate with other human artists who are against us being exploited to train generative AI. (This may be the time when you find out who your real friends are. Collective suffering brings oppressed people together. Unite.) Create remixes of each others’ works. Remix the remixes, too. And so on. These will be protected by copyright while AI outputs are not. Your skill will enable you to do this somewhat efficiently, and you will be less attached to these creations than you would be to the work you “dared” to call original. That said, never stop working on art that you truly love even if you don’t release it or only share it in special circumstances where the cost-benefit analysis makes sense. If you like creating original art, this kind of data strike means you may have to do some work you do not love (derivative work) but it will still be art (you will still probably like and enjoy it) and not a day job you hate. If you want to use AI (as you are constantly told you should) to ensure that you stay on top of the tech or to reduce the amount of original, human work available for corporations to scrape (and thereby contribute to the logical consequences of AI feeding itself its own ****), there are ethical models. (See Fairly Trained.) Also, keep pressuring your elected representatives to end to this madness.
@@umanyze5780 subscribed to you for this comment.
The potential with this for music production is crazy
Potential to kill it you mean?
@@t0mkat yeah, have no idea what he's thinking.
@@MoonLanta ahh yes, creativity🤦🏼♂️
@@yaboiavery5986 "artistic integrity" has long been dead my guy
@@t0mkat having ai do all the mastering and editing is a game changer.
This thing is beyond words amazing! Just listening to what people are making OMG!!!
Fans prefer an emotional connection to real artists. We are probably going to need two separate charts on spotify, napster, youtube and other streaming services... One for real artists and one for A.I.. .
I agree that the fans want an emotional connection, but what happens when EVERYONE can use this tool to make songs. What even is an artist at that point. How will it be possible to stand out when everyone can be as good as drake
Man this a game changer for a sample producer
I love it!!! I don’t care about the business side of this program but what I did love about it is that it helped me make a song about a dog I had that passed away and it made me a personalized song g about my dog that my family can listen to and keep his memory around…I also had it make me and my little girls a song about cleaning our room and house that we can play while we clean the house…can’t say how much I love this and thank you for this program…I hope this channel can keep pushing this, much love
They will be allowing users to split the track (not a musician so don’t know technical terms) and take just what you need ie: vocals, guitar, drums.
Stems, that’s impressive
A.I Might replace producers in some kinda ways
It'll do everything humans can do and things human can't do
Yeah it can make instrumentals, so in a couple of years/months you could just pay a subscription to get like 1200 free "custom" made beats/instrumentals as a artist.
Beatmakers maybe. Not musicians
@@dmtmediabrothers it'll replace everything you can think of in terms of skill
@@nijario9690 ai won't replace live, skilled musicians. Maybe ai's going to replace music producers someday but human performances are just different.
This is incredible! Could unlock things for people struggling to find the right sounds. Imagine in a few years this is running on our local computers for free. it's going to happen!
BTW you can run the model locally today not in a few years lol
eventually they will charge you a subscription fee. they always do :P
HOW is this generated and not recorded or sequenced?! I don't get it, it's so incredibly mind blowing....
Love the parallel universe theory. I was thinking the same. You’re onto smth 😅
Great video, great narration. What else can you ask for
I mean really! it's so good 😎
I got 1990s g-funk beats and it goes crazy
The first I can hear a Larry June beat from that one and the rock guitar shredding was so fire. I’ll definitely be using this.
I agree this is Soulful ..
Incredible, this has so much potential to revolutionize music 🎶 (you definitely called it Game).
the first RUclipsr to deep dive into the guts of prompts and do regular videos featuring the power is going to be big.
Soon, "prompting engineering" would be one of the most predominant job in the world.
Looks like a cyberpunk movie !
someone recently posted that they wanted AI to be doing their laundry and other chores, so they could have time to create art...not the other way around.
Exactly, tedious mundane tasks we'll still have to do, but creativity will be stolen in a snap...
Washing machine be like:
I feel like this is the death of music. The next project like this will just make hip hop beats and then everybody that listens to your channel will be out of business and as will you eventually.
The next phase of music!!
Stop being negative think of all the creative ideas u can use with this
Soon you will be able to listen to music in real time that adapts to your circumstance and mood. We were never more in interactive contact with music, but the only thing you can see is the little tree stuck to your nose.
Artists, from here on out, let’s go on a modified data strike that should make everyone, and I do mean everyone, happy. CREATE NOTHING NEW. Until we are adequately protected, let’s take remix culture to its most extreme ends. The pro-AI “art” community has told us repeatedly that there is no such thing as originality, everything is derivative, etc. They clearly believe we’ve reached the limits of human creativity and somehow feel qualified to tell us that art has become “stagnant.” (Never mind that these art whisperers include the same tech moguls who have fed the masses mediocre art through algorithms for decades.) Let’s not fight this strange alliance between billionaire tech moguls who are somehow suddenly democratizers and everyday people who believe themselves to be decent (or even progressive) but have no qualms about stealing from artists, including the majority of whom are poor or middle class. Let’s instead carry out their self-serving logic to its ridiculous end. Let’s turn the other cheek by doing what they’ve told us to do so many times: Be closer to their definition of “creative” and “adapt” as they have. Until artists are adequately protected and AI companies and grifters cannot scrape copyrighted works without artists’ consent and without crediting and fairly compensating each artist, stop feeding the machine. Use your advantage, which is skill. Make friends with and collaborate with other human artists who are against us being exploited to train generative AI. (This may be the time when you find out who your real friends are. Collective suffering brings oppressed people together. Unite.) Create remixes of each others’ works. Remix the remixes, too. And so on. These will be protected by copyright while AI outputs are not. Your skill will enable you to do this somewhat efficiently, and you will be less attached to these creations than you would be to the work you “dared” to call original. That said, never stop working on art that you truly love even if you don’t release it or only share it in special circumstances where the cost-benefit analysis makes sense. If you like creating original art, this kind of data strike means you may have to do some work you do not love (derivative work) but it will still be art (you will still probably like and enjoy it) and not a day job you hate. If you want to use AI (as you are constantly told you should) to ensure that you stay on top of the tech or to reduce the amount of original, human work available for corporations to scrape (and thereby contribute to the logical consequences of AI feeding itself its own ****), there are ethical models. (See Fairly Trained.) Also, keep pressuring your elected representatives to end to this madness.
Tried the latest AI generator for music Udio. Please, don't use it and don't help its learning process. It's scary good and the musicians are the people who should avoid it. Just play your damn real instrument and practice! At the moment it gives too high a premium for mere numbers. There’s only one real evil in the world: mediocrity. Soon you will regret it Peace and love! p.s It generated almost identical song and style of playing, as the greatest Satriani!
its possible to make full tracks..you just keep extending the track and add intro and outro to get full song...
I have been loving it so far . I just got access today. It took about to days to get in beta project.
Guess there's no longer need for humans that learn to make analog musical sound using skill, passion, and emotion, and CREATIVITY.
Same goes for visual Artists.
Isn't a solar flare heading this way?
This is UNREAL! I've been producing music for over 30 years now. Just played around with Udio.. and the results are MIND BLOWING! It's kind of a pitty that we only get 30 seconds. But if this beast ramps up to at least 3 minutes? Geeee! Not sure how the whole licensing part works. You can't copyright AI generated music. Still ... The results are STAGGERING!
you canxtnd tracks as long as u want
Only Nightmare would be the Big Music Labels buying these and only using the tech for themselves.
In the dystopian world of George Orwell’s 1984, there is a machine called a “versificator.” The versificator makes what might be called “fake” music-songs that are “composed without any human intervention whatever.” In April of 2016, “A New Rembrandt” was revealed (1). The painting, like the songs of a versificator, was made by machines. In August of 2016, Music Business Worldwide (2) accused Spotify of “creating fake artists.” What is a fake artist? Can music be fake?
The world of 1984 is a grim place. Members of the “Party” have access to resources based on their rank. The rest of society are called “Proles.” The term is short for the “proletarian” and refers to the working class. The Proles make up the majority of society, and so the Party provides them with various sources of entertainment to keep them from getting too restless.
Well done, you understand what's really going on
@@Gruziller When people stop being creative because AI can do it better we are doomed. Being creative is humans greatest trait. We will become slugs and go extinct. The AI music seems troubling but it is nothing compared to artificial intelligence and robots taking everyone's jobs. They will easily be able to herd us up like cattle for the slaughter.
😮
I don't know the last time music has flashed me like this... I can understand your shock
Yep, the voices are amazing! And the musics are really wow
Damn you can make full songs, you can extend existing tracks. Adding intros, outros and sections
18:35 💀 "girl I dun tried.." 😂😂 That's that southern contemporary gospel radio station songs you hear driving through Birmingham Alabama
The only thing that could make it perfect ,is to have "stems" automatically. And the sound quality will be "wav"
it will be, probably within weeks. This stuff evolves exponentially. There will be zero need for human creativity in music within 2 years. Maybe less time.
People in the comments talking about music producers being replaced lol yall… everyone is going to be replaced by AI. Wait and see.
As a solo game developer this might be the thing I need. I would love to hire someone to make some music, but I just have no budget for it. And this seems good enough.
Wow. This is awesome!
Even humans struggle with soul, ai will never replicate but will come close.
Yeah it's a ChatGPT moment for music. It's very interesting to get a hardcore music person's take on this. I can tell your mind is blown.
I’m still like in awe, can’t wait to see what’s next !
amazing stuff, , Suno i've been using for the last couple weeks and i think has the edge on genres - but , i'm sure that's gonna change in another week or 2
What im most intrigued by is how this will effect tracklib and sampling as a whole. Sampling has provided so much of a bag for greedy labels and this now coming up in the market, the more we use a tool like this, the less leverage they have, and maybe theyll actually start to loosen the fuck up and allow up and coming producers to remix their art and split compensation instead of wanting the whole pie.
Imagine wanting to keep the rights for ur “samples”
I agree to the greed thing, I also see it as paying dues to our OGs by sampling them. Essentially making them a part of our success!
But, if that was gatekept , then now we see what happens when the OGs don’t embrace the younger talent.
yall so focused on "soul samples" bro there is so much music that has NOTHING to do with chopping samples (which I do chop samples all the time) but the positives of that do not outweigh the negatives.
Agree Udio is awesome ❤ I will be using in my channel
This will separate the wheat for the husk. People with GENUINE musical ears will excel, leaving even accomplished musicians in the dust. Music is deeper than mere instruments. Udio! Let’s go!
My mouth was agape when I heard the demonic screechings and barely familiar instruments of OpenAI jukebox just a few years ago. Music generation has a come a long long way since then.
amazing big Game truly amazing maybe A.i is NOT the opp we thought so far i love it possibilities are endless! ❤🔥❤🔥❤🔥
just posted my first generation from Udio. stuff is crazy bro!!
The leader in music information
Thank you, fl studio sensei.
Busy works beats!!!
I’ve seen something like this before where someone would describe the music they want to hear, and the AI would generate it. It couldn’t sing, though. And it was mainly short clips, but this is awesome. The thing can sing for you!
It's been to where for about 4 yrs you could even hum the tone of lyrics and set the tempo and could make a beat off the tone and there's an insane amount of tech available that can greatly assist in the writing process and making beats, or just in music all together as long as it's used right.
@@TananJess I've never heard about humming the tone of the lyrics and AI would make a song for you, but that sounds interesting.
Yo bro i have been using for a few weeks now its blown my mind too! i made a parady song about Jada smith dancing in her dressing gown! the chorus sounds so much like Nate Dogg i got emotional lol :'( RIP! but is it a non commercial license on udio? id prefer to use for sampling! but making jingles / intros for social media stuff? im too scared even to strip a drum loop out of a beat! Keep up the grind brother
To be honest, just looking at it, l think it's a branch off from Suno. Just like they are going after AI on what the models are trained on, they are trying to force the developer to disclose materials used to train the models. So that the artist can cash in.
that 2nd beat is insane
Let me introduce you to the midi chord pack….
I just did a 90s R&B song, extended the track with just additional lyrics and it still fit the song. Dude sounded like K-Ci though lol
Free Beats category about to go bye bye or super saturated? which way will it go
You can hear the artifacts though. Still crazy sounding.
It sounds mostly like lower quality mp3's. That's not much of a criticism...
A new shift in creative roles, we’ll be become Executive producers with the curators hat 🎩 . Quality control of the mixes should be the a key focus. I like the extend feature that shapes the ideas into full songs. And there will be song referencing and stems available in the future. The vocal fluidity and comprehension is on point with the instrumentation. I’ve been in Motown / Stax world . Mind blowing 🤯
Forget what you know about music because Udio AI is changing the game! It's like having Beethoven and Einstein team up to create the ultimate symphony. 😮🔥🔥🔥
Try this in the prompt:
Create a song in the voice of Adele .
It will create the song in their voice and the voice is great
do not underestimate Machine Learning
big faxx ! 📠
Everyone does and they keep moving the goalposts of what is good” until it's great and then they get terrified like they couldn't see it coming.
This is amazing.....Will udio replace us producers
I created a few tracks today this is absolutely amazing but at the same time it's scary my mind is blown to say the least .
Wonderful❤️😍🥰🎶🎵
Damn, I've been grinding so hard lately this year to learn how to produce and make music, is it even worth it to continue to learn and make music now in a 'traditional' sense? Can this tool render like stems out per say like if you were like '808' basslines in the key of something would it make that? so it's basically like chat GPT for making music?
All those skills will just let you use Ai tools in better, cooler ways
Let’s be honest, AI can make music better than most, including myself in some genres.
Some 14 yr olds can wipe grown men clean in beat battles
But that’s not what makes music a business, it’s more than talent.
It’s story and connection + sounds
Make good music and you’ll be fine. It’s the mediocre stuff that will be washed away by this.
Everyone is so selfish that they will make their own music and think its better.
this thing is incredible. I wonder how much subscription will cost, but it's already quite usable and fun, and really liking the music I'm getting out of it
You are looking at your replacement as a producer!
nah, one of the best things a producer has is a Curated Taste and a Vision. The best use for this right now is making samples.
@@TallicaMan1986 its all how you look at it. Anyone with no skill or talent can tell this thing how to make a beat and it will do it for you. Why pay a producer when An artist can download this for free and make a beat himself in seconds. This technology is only going to get better. Making money as a producer in the traditional way is coming to an end.
People like to be so negative when it comes to new innovation, think about all the new creative ideas this can birth
@@Chopping-it-up yeah that's fine if you like Fast food. There is art out there beyond just generic basics. Ai to be able to lay out how it feels through music has a long way too go. It's cool and I'm Pro Ai. Humans are more crafty then you give them credit for. Artists will pull through using this tech.
@@TallicaMan1986 The thing is many people like fast food. And it makes more money than real restaurants. Same thing with this its gonna get better and there will be no need for an artist to buy a beat when they can tell a free software to make them a beat that sounds like a real producer made it. The quality of music today is nothing like it was years ago. Because people with no skill or talent have found away in the business. With this its gonna be even more people that suck making music. I mean it even creates vocals no need for an artist or producer anyone can now just tell this thing to make an album.
That second ai in the playlist sounded like Animals as Leaders wtf!🤯
the start of the end of the music industry ... electronic music will die first and then slowly also the instrumental and live music
It’s entirely within artists’ powers to stop this. We control the supply. Artists, from here on out, let’s go on a modified data strike that should make everyone, and I do mean everyone, happy. CREATE NOTHING NEW. Until we are adequately protected, let’s take remix culture to its most extreme ends. The pro-AI “art” community has told us repeatedly that there is no such thing as originality, everything is derivative, etc. They clearly believe we’ve reached the limits of human creativity and somehow feel qualified to tell us that art has become “stagnant.” (Never mind that these art whisperers include the same tech moguls who have fed the masses mediocre art through algorithms for decades.) Let’s not fight this strange alliance between billionaire tech moguls who are somehow suddenly democratizers and everyday people who believe themselves to be decent (or even progressive) but have no qualms about stealing from artists, including the majority of whom are poor or middle class. Let’s instead carry out their self-serving logic to its ridiculous end. Let’s turn the other cheek by doing what they’ve told us to do so many times: Be closer to their definition of “creative” and “adapt” as they have. Until artists are adequately protected and AI companies and grifters cannot scrape copyrighted works without artists’ consent and without crediting and fairly compensating each artist, stop feeding the machine. Use your advantage, which is skill. Make friends with and collaborate with other human artists who are against us being exploited to train generative AI. (This may be the time when you find out who your real friends are. Collective suffering brings oppressed people together. Unite.) Create remixes of each others’ works. Remix the remixes, too. And so on. These will be protected by copyright while AI outputs are not. Your skill will enable you to do this somewhat efficiently, and you will be less attached to these creations than you would be to the work you “dared” to call original. That said, never stop working on art that you truly love even if you don’t release it or only share it in special circumstances where the cost-benefit analysis makes sense. If you like creating original art, this kind of data strike means you may have to do some work you do not love (derivative work) but it will still be art (you will still probably like and enjoy it) and not a day job you hate. If you want to use AI (as you are constantly told you should) to ensure that you stay on top of the tech or to reduce the amount of original, human work available for corporations to scrape (and thereby contribute to the logical consequences of AI feeding itself its own ****), there are ethical models. (See Fairly Trained.) Also, keep pressuring your elected representatives to end to this madness.
No lie, this is dope. I hope they make it more accessible though for us who have to use screen readers.
20:23
Interesting
In future updates you will have more control over the songs. All these daw software companies better start integrating this or they will be obsolete
Big fax I even saw a DAW that takes prompts lol
@@busyworksbeats with how fast AI is moving their should be a cloud daw pretty soon that has an AI music generator. You could have the ability to upload your own reference tracks for the AI to create something similar. It's going to be very interesting.
Audacity has rolled out AI features. Not nearly the same quality, but it's a first step.
@@NorthgateLP I hope other companies notice free software adopting AI before them. I use Maschine and haven't touched it in two weeks since Suno updated to V3
as production becomes more infinite in possibility substance seems to be disappearing
Think about this...Udio to Audacity using the OpenVINO AI plugin and make stems for the tracks. Then chop and screw and sample those tracks!! Like he said...infinite samples!!!!
Everyone thinks - "Oh, what a nice tool! It replaces 'x' in my creative process"
What it's really doing - It's replacing YOU in the creative process.
The case of replacing the need to pay for things like stock sounds is interesting because it's true. But what is so bothersome is that these AI tools aren't creating anything new BESIDES replacing human work. That part-time producer who was earning some extra cash making samples? Donezoo. We as music producers should be able to differentiate between "GOOD" AI tools that can unlock **NEW** creative processes vs. predatory ones that seek to marginalize other creatives.
Anyone who respects the craft of music production should be outraged. Do you truly feel attached, fulfilled or expressed when you type some words into a prompt? Or are these tools simply designed to rob us of the very essence of the craft - the process itself.
I agree. Also, I think most of those excited are not musicians. Those who say they are rarely provide any examples of music they created before AI to back up their claim. Anyway, as long as you’re the source upon which the whole system is dependent, you have the power. Artists, from here on out, let’s go on a modified data strike that should make everyone, and I do mean everyone, happy. CREATE NOTHING NEW. Until we are adequately protected, let’s take remix culture to its most extreme ends. The pro-AI “art” community has told us repeatedly that there is no such thing as originality, everything is derivative, etc. They clearly believe we’ve reached the limits of human creativity and somehow feel qualified to tell us that art has become “stagnant.” (Never mind that these art whisperers include the same tech moguls who have fed the masses mediocre art through algorithms for decades.) Let’s not fight this strange alliance between billionaire tech moguls who are somehow suddenly democratizers and everyday people who believe themselves to be decent (or even progressive) but have no qualms about stealing from artists, including the majority of whom are poor or middle class. Let’s instead carry out their self-serving logic to its ridiculous end. Let’s turn the other cheek by doing what they’ve told us to do so many times: Be closer to their definition of “creative” and “adapt” as they have. Until artists are adequately protected and AI companies and grifters cannot scrape copyrighted works without artists’ consent and without crediting and fairly compensating each artist, stop feeding the machine. Use your advantage, which is skill. Make friends with and collaborate with other human artists who are against us being exploited to train generative AI. (This may be the time when you find out who your real friends are. Collective suffering brings oppressed people together. Unite.) Create remixes of each others’ works. Remix the remixes, too. And so on. These will be protected by copyright while AI outputs are not. Your skill will enable you to do this somewhat efficiently, and you will be less attached to these creations than you would be to the work you “dared” to call original. That said, never stop working on art that you truly love even if you don’t release it or only share it in special circumstances where the cost-benefit analysis makes sense. If you like creating original art, this kind of data strike means you may have to do some work you do not love (derivative work) but it will still be art (you will still probably like and enjoy it) and not a day job you hate. If you want to use AI (as you are constantly told you should) to ensure that you stay on top of the tech or to reduce the amount of original, human work available for corporations to scrape (and thereby contribute to the logical consequences of AI feeding itself its own ****), there are ethical models. (See Fairly Trained.) Also, keep pressuring your elected representatives to end to this madness.
This is 💯🔥My only question is copyright too! A friend of mine told me about this so it would help me finish my unfinished songs. Do you think this could help singer- songwriter too?
have you tried extending the song yet
Yes it works amazingly
I am also in the team blown away by the beta version of UDIO. This is crazy on every level.
So exciting!!!
The examples still sound mediocre to me.
However, it will be used by content creators who want to have a little more influence on their background beats without having any idea how to produce them.
I would still recommend them to use loop-based production.
The loops offer the craftsmanship of professional musicians for free.
This will always be an advantage for the final result because of the human-creative aspects involved.
Are the songs it generates actually useable for commercial use, like sampling for selling beats???
Right, can I use this for my short films? What about a feature film?
I laughed so much with this app.
Its cool that it works in multiple languages
lets get an update, seems like they are moving pretty fast.
im blown away by the vocals
17:03 - 17:30 I'm linking this 27s to anyone who says AI has no soul.
I'm 46 and grew up as a musician in black southern baptist churches as a musician for over 30 years.
I love music, I listen to everything from The Beatles, to RHCP, to Bootsy, to Victor Wooten, to Thomas Prigden, to Heltah Skeltah, to AC/DC, to Buckethead, to Method Man, to Nirvana, to R.L. Burnside, to Jimi Hendrix...let's just say I love good music.
And the aforementioned 27s, was some of the best music I've ever had the pleasure to hear. AI has just made me a believer.
Soulless? Hell naw! This AI is definitely invited to the cookout.
You got a new subscriber! ;) Thanks for showing this.
Thank you!
this AI gives you separated tracks so better mixing is avaible?
Is there a hard coded prompt for Gumby music?
The music is insane. I hope they incorporate stems.
true, I also want the ability to extend a portion of a song into a new thing that'd be fire
@@busyworksbeats i beleve they added this feature as i've heard some full length tracks today.
I wonder how the copyright and commercial use works, I'm sure many people want to use this for Lyrics and flows, but want to sing it themselves etc, this is very promising though
You can now make 15 minute songs if you extend it
It seems like the main issue is that it has been trained on mp3-quality audio. I wonder how that could be fixed
this is beta, just the test dummy. Not even version 1.... wait for version 3 it will be more creative than any human could ever be and mixed/mastered better than any real human.
if you are an artist, couldn't you just use this to make your own beats without even using a daw really (make a trap/hip hop instrumental)
Technically, only thing I see is BPM is moving target so it may be a bit difficult to line up vocals
@@busyworksbeatssure Logic has way to quantumfy the beat
If you're building a sample bank surely it would make sense to use the instrumental keyword to generate without lyrics?
True! Sometimes I like when it has vocals, it adds that vibe
Imagine when you break this down just into sampling the stems....
UDIO IS SCARY GOOD!😱