These will never replace petroleum products. Reason being is that these things are manufactured, transported, built and maintained using PETROLEUM PRODUCTS.
It's possible to make anything without fossil fuels. You can even make high quality steel without coal nowadays. Electric or hydrogen powered vehicles can do logistics. Electricity can easily be provided by renewable means via hydroelectric dams, wind turbines, tidal power, solar panels combined to offset one another and provide constant output.
@@shaddaboop7998 Yop .. all that low density sprawling "green" hardware. A sight for you and all the others who consider wild unspoiled lands an underutilized resource. Bring on the levelers !
THIS is just ONE 'new' Industry working toward a more refined and cost-effective product for a green future...but let's make sure the process is more ENERGY EFFICIENT...passive solar etc to heat the metals etc...
good look trying to use solar energy to heat a few tons of steel to 1530°C. Ignoring the fact, that passive heating with the sun cannot reach those temperatures (at which point you'll need to acitvely pump more energy into heating everything) I'd reccon, that the amount of energy needed is so large, that it cannot be generated with solar energy. (Not even talking about the piss poor power output from solar-panels)
Has anyone calculate the amount of energy it took to fabricate and erect the wind turbine, and how many years the turbine need to produce energy to regain the energy it consumed?
Wind turbines are the ugliest thing, they ruin the landscape. IMO a major impetus is that fact that "green energy" production is a boost to western economies where as fossil fuels benefits many of west's protagonists Russia, iran, Venezuela and all the arab countries (OPEC +). If it was the other way around, global warming would not have been an issue. As an example what is the carbon foot print of Ukraine war and its its eventual reconstruction? Why the west is not advocating for peace just from environmental aspect.
@@mvs9122 I think the opposite. Wind turbines demonstrate human ability to generate electricity near towns without smoke or smog. Looks are down to personal preference but still I think that a wind farm looks infinitely better than a bunch of smoking chimneys. The fossil fuels WOULD be an issue for a simple reason - it's not an infinite resource. Eventually industry would have to move to cleaner and renewable energy to be sustainable. Locking your mind that burning is the only way to go makes you very short sighted.
Thanks! Very nice looking machinery, everything new. Tax breaks, subsidies for purpose built wind energy factory, because there wasn't current manufacturing capacity available?
Avrupa yüzde 1 fire ile üretim yapıyor, Türkiye yüzde 15 20 bu veriler yüzde 40 50 leri bulabiliyor ,Bu makina parkuru ,Türkiyede yok...! Bilhassa forjin işçiliği...? Saraylar iyimi..!
you want to talk carbon footprint? how long does it take to recover it? most "renewable" energy is an outright lie. wind, solar and ev's are by no means improving our situation.
more damaging than a few oil wells. more fun. so a one billion pound steel weight would be 4 billion cubic inches. 1200 inches on a side. a cube 100x100x100 feet. the first gear would be the most massive.,,,,,,
Wind turbines are the ugliest thing, they ruin the landscape. IMO a major impetus is that fact that "green energy" production is a boost to western economies where as fossil fuels benefits many of west's protagonists Russia, iran, Venezuela and all the arab countries (OPEC +). If it was the other way around, global warming would not have been an issue. As an example what is the carbon foot print of Ukraine war and its its eventual reconstruction? Why the west is not advocating for peace just from environmental aspect.
A shame that you watch Fox News......and believe it. Human caused climate change is real but don't worry, you won't be around for the worst of it, just your kids and grandkids.
Wind turbines are the ugliest thing, they ruin the landscape. IMO a major impetus is that fact that "green energy" production is a boost to western economies where as fossil fuels benefits many of west's protagonists Russia, iran, Venezuela and all the arab countries (OPEC +). If it was the other way around, global warming would not have been an issue. As an example what is the carbon foot print of Ukraine war and its its eventual reconstruction? Why the west is not advocating for peace just from environmental aspect.
The brain power that goes into thinking of everything, from design to manufacturing is amazing. Thanks for sharing. Great video.
Glad you like it. Thanks for watching!
Think of thomas edison..
well, you can safely assume that this is a team effort, many experts of different fields being responsible for different parts of the production phase
Cảm ơn video chia sẻ của bạn rất hữu ích, chức bạn sức khỏe và hạnh phúc.
Absolutely astounding amount of torque! 9900 kNm = 7,301,865.28 Foot-pound force.
As a machinist I thank you!
Good video
These will never replace petroleum products. Reason being is that these things are manufactured, transported, built and maintained using PETROLEUM PRODUCTS.
I should have mentioned petroleum products in general.
Steel mills use a lot of power and natural gas to make their products.
Reduction is the goal not elimination
Always one idiot in the crowd...Lol
It's possible to make anything without fossil fuels. You can even make high quality steel without coal nowadays. Electric or hydrogen powered vehicles can do logistics. Electricity can easily be provided by renewable means via hydroelectric dams, wind turbines, tidal power, solar panels combined to offset one another and provide constant output.
@@shaddaboop7998 Yop .. all that low density sprawling "green" hardware. A sight for you and all the others who consider wild unspoiled lands an underutilized resource. Bring on the levelers !
My best friend, Thank you for your hard work in making the video. I enjoyed the good video. Have a happy day.
Glad you like it. Have a great day.
Baby kingDom TeSla love 😍🙏😻
Great video ! 👍
09:12 on sounds like a Sun O))) rehearsal :D
Thank you……very interesting. The explanations were particularly helpful.
Bravo to all engineers ❤❤❤
i like this
Very nice
3:10 nice gauntlets for tiranozaurus. if he had em, he probably has proper size hands. pity.
THIS is just ONE 'new' Industry working toward a more refined and cost-effective product for a green future...but let's make sure the process is more ENERGY EFFICIENT...passive solar etc to heat the metals etc...
good look trying to use solar energy to heat a few tons of steel to 1530°C.
Ignoring the fact, that passive heating with the sun cannot reach those temperatures
(at which point you'll need to acitvely pump more energy into heating everything)
I'd reccon, that the amount of energy needed is so large, that it cannot be generated with solar energy.
(Not even talking about the piss poor power output from solar-panels)
Примерно двести лет назад когда строили паровые машины для пароходов должно было быть подобное оборудование.
Anak ituh tiap hari cuma
Jajana,tapi ingat hidup itu susah..
Watching that mill take a 3/4" bite of that stock made me want to put my hands in my pockets. lol
Wow a Germanic David Brown.
@11:17 is this gleason-pfauter p2400 ?
Has anyone calculate the amount of energy it took to fabricate and erect the wind turbine, and how many years the turbine need to produce energy to regain the energy it consumed?
My thoughts too
Wikipedia lists an energy amortization period between 5 and 14 months, see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_return_on_investment.
Wind turbines are the ugliest thing, they ruin the landscape. IMO a major impetus is that fact that "green energy" production is a boost to western economies where as fossil fuels benefits many of west's protagonists Russia, iran, Venezuela and all the arab countries (OPEC +). If it was the other way around, global warming would not have been an issue. As an example what is the carbon foot print of Ukraine war and its its eventual reconstruction? Why the west is not advocating for peace just from environmental aspect.
Good point. It could then be compared with full life-cycle costs of all other forms of electricity generation.
@@mvs9122 I think the opposite. Wind turbines demonstrate human ability to generate electricity near towns without smoke or smog. Looks are down to personal preference but still I think that a wind farm looks infinitely better than a bunch of smoking chimneys.
The fossil fuels WOULD be an issue for a simple reason - it's not an infinite resource. Eventually industry would have to move to cleaner and renewable energy to be sustainable. Locking your mind that burning is the only way to go makes you very short sighted.
Thanks! Very nice looking machinery, everything new. Tax breaks, subsidies for purpose built wind energy factory, because there wasn't current manufacturing capacity available?
It take more energy to build a wind turbine than it well ever produce.
👍
Captions are way too fast, can't read that fast while watching the video at the same time.
Hello ,so amazing
I need speed multiplier gearbox as wind turbine
please share me your catalogue
At 11‘30“ we hear chips falling from a heavy lathe… That‘s not the sound of this gear milling machine…
Solar Panels are so much better than Wind Turbines.
Erstaunliche Wellen
Where is this factory?
Germany we make nothing here.all our smart machinist are retired.the kids are stupid.and don't want to get dirty or learn.
Very hard manufacturing
Yes sir
What country?
germany
The people that are naysayers are the same ones that would be still in a horse and buggy.
Avrupa yüzde 1 fire ile üretim yapıyor, Türkiye yüzde 15 20 bu veriler yüzde 40 50 leri bulabiliyor ,Bu makina parkuru ,Türkiyede yok...! Bilhassa forjin işçiliği...? Saraylar iyimi..!
Population must be reduced pure and simple. Then all would live better lives. The world is messed up.
No this is not NKMZ
moccc
Hello
you want to talk carbon footprint? how long does it take to recover it? most "renewable" energy is an outright lie. wind, solar and ev's are by no means improving our situation.
more damaging than a few oil wells. more fun. so a one billion pound steel weight would be 4 billion cubic inches. 1200 inches on a side. a cube 100x100x100 feet. the first gear would be the most massive.,,,,,,
Wind turbines are the ugliest thing, they ruin the landscape. IMO a major impetus is that fact that "green energy" production is a boost to western economies where as fossil fuels benefits many of west's protagonists Russia, iran, Venezuela and all the arab countries (OPEC +). If it was the other way around, global warming would not have been an issue. As an example what is the carbon foot print of Ukraine war and its its eventual reconstruction? Why the west is not advocating for peace just from environmental aspect.
A shame all those resources and expertise building such a useless item.
A shame that you watch Fox News......and believe it. Human caused climate change is real but don't worry, you won't be around for the worst of it, just your kids and grandkids.
Useless comment from equally useless person
Wind turbines are the ugliest thing, they ruin the landscape. IMO a major impetus is that fact that "green energy" production is a boost to western economies where as fossil fuels benefits many of west's protagonists Russia, iran, Venezuela and all the arab countries (OPEC +). If it was the other way around, global warming would not have been an issue. As an example what is the carbon foot print of Ukraine war and its its eventual reconstruction? Why the west is not advocating for peace just from environmental aspect.
What the hell. Fake information.
Красиво интересно. Но вы обосрАлись перед гегемоном плебеи. И участь ваша не завидна.
Woher soll das alles Wissen
China
No this is not NKMZ