@@PHILOnotes If you are truly a Professor of Ethics as you say then why is it you did not correct some of the definitions she used? Meta ethics is defined wrongly here. She thinks meta ethics describes acts themselves as moral or immoral. She does not mention the distinctions between Psychology and Philosophy definitions to Ethics. She gives the Psychology definition just like everyone else who claims to Study Ethics. Philosophers focus on Normative Ethics when describing "Morality". People outside of Philosophy do the other stuff like she does in the video. Not a good description of the subject and certainly brings up the question "WHY STUDY THIS ANYWAY?" especially if this is not applicable everywhere simultaneously. We already know what subjectivism is. We don't need another word for what we already have if she is correct.
You have summarized introduction to ethics in a nut shell. I will use this lecture as a guideline for my reflection of what I have learned in this course.
❤i was very confused while reading the textbook for exam preparation but now after watching this video about ethic, described in simple sentences with examples.... Thank you mam .
thanks too, Sir Gun Real Omega. we are glad that you find our videos helpful. we will be posting more videos in Ethics and Introduction to Philosophy of the Human Person soon. all the best!
sure, Sir. we will take note of that. we will do it asap. meantime, we'll finish what we are doing at the moment, that is, on Ethics and IPHP. best wishes!
I've recently self-published a novel that might be of interest to people who are fascinated by ethical dilemmas :) It's called The Decision by Nathan McGregor. It's available in Kindle and paperback format.
@@PHILOnotes i am a DepEd Senior High School Teacher maam. I'm not really a Philosophy major by degree. Thanks a lot to your videos. I will be using them as supplementary learning materials.
@@marielvillanueva199 Sure, Sir Mariel. We will be uploading more videos. Please note however that we are making videos on the following topics in philosophy: 1) Ethics, 2) Logic, 3) Intro to Philosophy of the Human Person, 4) Understanding the Self, and 5) Philosophical Quotes, and 6) other related topics in philosophy. So, we will be uploading video lectures on these topics alternately.
3. What is your understanding of applied ethics? As discussed in the video, applied ethics guides individuals in their choice of action. It is commonly observed with the individuals suffering from a moral problem like abortion or euthanasia. Applied ethics attempt to resolve the conflicting issues that surrounds the particular moral problems.
We have to answer three questions to consider our action is moral. This is an isolated incident. Definitely our reaction will be of exceptional nature. Otherwise there is no such thing as freewill which is the gift of God. Any way the questions are A..What is motive behind the action ? B...Is the reason is universally acceptable? C.. killing is immoral then prevention is moral. In the said example the person involved is killed to prevent further murders not only in the present but in future also. .killing is immoral but here we are forced to choose between killing a person and allowing him to murder. We have freewill to choose either of them and there is no question any doubt. . If we don't act we will be committing a sin of far reaching consequences.
thank you for your great explanation and real information about ethics. am doing bioethics course and would like some information about it if it possible. thanks
Hello - Great work. BUT something confused me A LOT. "the action of killing the terrorist is wrong according to metaethics" - Metaethics??? (does metaethics care about that?) It is wrong according to Kantian deontology/ethics but not according to Utilitarianism - both are ethical theories (under the category Normative ethics). The last slide is very confusing/wrong - or i totally misunderstood the whole thing. :D
Ethics has limited use for logic and truth and is more the realm of opinion and instinct. For instance, the golden rule and happiness are a matter of opinion.
Hi Gofaona Mokgothu, many thanks for your inspiring comments. We are glad you found our videos helpful. By the way, aesthetics is that branch of philosophy that studies the nature, meaning, and dynamics of beauty. We hope this helps. Cheers!
All was well until the example of police officer. It says according to meta it is wrong which is completely nonsensical thing to say. Actually meta ethics is the only means to understand actions as ethical or not as normative ethics is simply synthesis of meta into daily life
thanks a heap, Muhammad, for your very inspiring comments. by the way, what do you mean by "socialization" in this context? for example, are talking about socialization in "education" or socialization from the vantage point of sociology?
If we have a right to own wealth, to own more property than needed to have a comfortable life, than we have a right to do harm and humanity is domed to suffer extinction by global warming. On the other hand, if our wealth belongs to those suffering hunger, than humanity has some chance to survive.
there are things that we simply have to do outside the bounds of morality, and i think one of them is ignoring questions. it may not be proper or appropriate in human relations, but i have the right to ignore questions, especially if i am not legally bound to do so.
you're wrong in the end, metaethics does not judge action if they are right or wrong, metaethics asks the question : what do mean by good ? the two major ethical theories are deontology and consequentialism : deontology would that killing is always wrong, consequentialism would say (maybe) that saving lives by killing one or two person is morally permissible or actually good.
Why do people always get this WRONG? In philosophy there are specific sets of Principles in Ethics. In Philosophy there are at least 4 main branches of Ethics that are taught: Descriptive Ethics, Normative Ethics, Meta Ethic and Applied Ethics. All of these are well defined. Normative Ethics is the specific branch of Philosophy that covers "MORALITY" and is not anything like you described. What you described is "Descriptive Ethics" which is not part of actual Philosophy departments in any University. Descriptive Ethics is closer to Psychology & Anthropology which is why it is seen as SUBJECTIVE and useless. Descriptive Ethics says that some authority figure gets to make the rules essentially ---hint to why this is SUBJECTIVE! You will NOT find this definition in "NORMATIVE ETHICS". When Philosophers speak to others on their LEVEL about "Morality" they exclusively speak about NORMATIVE ETHICS. When teachers speak on "morality" they often do what you did and NOT EVEN MENTION NORMATIVE ETHICS correctly. Normative means there is a systematic way --not a subjective way to a "UNIVERSAL SET OF RULES" in a given domain. What good is Morality if it does not apply everywhere on Earth? We already have systems like this why do we need another WORD or TERMINOLOGY for what we already have words for? Morality ought to be a UNIVERSAL SET OF RULES & PRINCIPLES that govern all people otherwise what is the point of it? Ethics is subjectivism basically based on what you define here. Ethics is based on social norms NOT morality. Ethics rules that can apply in NY can exist but those rules do not apply and will not work in Spain. Why study Ethics again? Morality should be studied because it differs from Ethics as it applies UNIVERSALLY where Ethics applies to smaller groups and not to everyone at the same time. If you do not make this distinction EARLY then why do this? Meta Ethics in Philosophy is SEMANTIC; It is purely about the language used in the field of Normative Ethics. Meta Ethics is not behavior evaluative such as act x is immoral. Meta Ethics is a meta language only. Where did you get these definitions?
Since i dont believe in free will ethics and morality has a very different assumptions. The evolution of behavior in our inborn behavior and in the evolution of society drive miral behavior. Whatever helps survival largly wins. Empath for example may have survival value as seen in hurd animals where the older, stronger adults protect the weaker younger members.
im a professor of ethics, it's my first time to teach this, thank you
THIS FEELS LIKE A MEDITATION 😭. My inner self is healing as I hear the voice and the background music
fr 😭🥺
oh, thank you, Gliezel. cheers!
I am a professor of ethics but your explanation is crystal clear. You explained a complicated topic in simple and understandable terms.
Thank you so much, Sir Christopher, for your very inspiring comment. Best wishes!
@@PHILOnotes If you are truly a Professor of Ethics as you say then why is it you did not correct some of the definitions she used? Meta ethics is defined wrongly here. She thinks meta ethics describes acts themselves as moral or immoral. She does not mention the distinctions between Psychology and Philosophy definitions to Ethics. She gives the Psychology definition just like everyone else who claims to Study Ethics. Philosophers focus on Normative Ethics when describing "Morality". People outside of Philosophy do the other stuff like she does in the video. Not a good description of the subject and certainly brings up the question "WHY STUDY THIS ANYWAY?" especially if this is not applicable everywhere simultaneously. We already know what subjectivism is. We don't need another word for what we already have if she is correct.
Same here...I admire how she explained in a very simple and comprehensive way.
Hi, professor. Can I send some article about ethics? And let me to ask you where are you from? Do you work at university or at school?
@@PHILOnotes ❤
You have summarized introduction to ethics in a nut shell. I will use this lecture as a guideline for my reflection of what I have learned in this course.
❤i was very confused while reading the textbook for exam preparation but now after watching this video about ethic, described in simple sentences with examples.... Thank you mam .
Here because reporting namo ugma nya Wala ko kasabot. Laban!💪
Here because of online class. Fighting! 💪
Yeah, you can do it, Bon Bon! We wish you all the best in your studies!
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
you are the best explainer. i feel, ethnics and morals are similar,but i understood that they have different roles.
Thanks for your video.
Lots of thanks Madam from INDIA 🇮🇳✨💖✨. Outstanding and Simplified lecture.👍👍
It's not very easy to find such a crystal clear explanation of philosophical terms.
Great help in studies.
Thank you so much @philo-notes
You're so welcome! Glad to hear that you find our video lectures helpful!
I am a very young dude but this made sense. I learned about ethics/moral philosophy from The Good Place. I like ethics now.
glad to know that, Bubblez. we wish you all the best! cheers!
@@PHILOnotesI like ethics too =)
@@fluffyvideos3864 great! thanks
@@PHILOnotesPHILO-notes can you please take a look at my channel?
This is called teaching in the true sense! Thank you!
Thank you so much for your sweet and very inspiring comments, Lovejoy! I wish you all the best!
I'll definitely watch this every now and then to understand our lesson in Ethics. Thank you so much for this!
No worries, Lhie Ann. I wish you all the best!
This video has really been helpful,thank you.Online class has never been this amazing.
Glad to hear that our vides are of help! Thank you for your inspiring comment!
great presentation. short yet comprehensive. Thanks a lot. This is a big help for my Ethics class. God speed!
thanks too, Sir Gun Real Omega. we are glad that you find our videos helpful. we will be posting more videos in Ethics and Introduction to Philosophy of the Human Person soon. all the best!
PHILO-notes that would be great. if you could also make a presentation about ancient western philisophy.
sure, Sir. we will take note of that. we will do it asap. meantime, we'll finish what we are doing at the moment, that is, on Ethics and IPHP. best wishes!
Very clear explanation and useful to my further studies. Thank you so much.
Amazing explanation + soothing background sound = Meditative Learning Experience. Thank You Very Much. ❤
I've recently self-published a novel that might be of interest to people who are fascinated by ethical dilemmas :) It's called The Decision by Nathan McGregor. It's available in Kindle and paperback format.
All clear what is ethics.
Thanks ma'am
got to teach Intro to Philo for the 1st time during this new normal. Your videos will help me a lot. Thanks
Glad to hear from you, Sir Mariel. We are delighted to learn our video helps. Which university are you from, if you don't mind?
@@PHILOnotes i am a DepEd Senior High School Teacher maam. I'm not really a Philosophy major by degree. Thanks a lot to your videos. I will be using them as supplementary learning materials.
@@marielvillanueva199 I see. I wish you all the best in your career, Sir Mariel! God bless you!
@@PHILOnotes God bless you too maam.. Continue to upload more videos and you will be of great help to many
@@marielvillanueva199 Sure, Sir Mariel. We will be uploading more videos. Please note however that we are making videos on the following topics in philosophy: 1) Ethics, 2) Logic, 3) Intro to Philosophy of the Human Person, 4) Understanding the Self, and 5) Philosophical Quotes, and 6) other related topics in philosophy. So, we will be uploading video lectures on these topics alternately.
This video is very huge helpful to me, thanks a lot!
Thank you, miss! I loved this.
No worries, mate. Glad you loved it!
My God whenever I hear your voice, I became so happy unfortunately i have never seen you but only your voice which is god gift. Thank you
Oh, many thanks William for your sweet and very inspiring comments. Best wishes!
Simple and clear , thanks 😄
I'm here for our online class! Who's with me?
I'm with you 😉
All the best, Pia Michelle!
All the best, too, Katrina!
Which university were you from?
Which university where you from?
Know to do right from wrong. Stay focused.
Glad to hear some positive from you, Maria Makinen. Thanks. Cheers!
Ethics and morality is equal for every human
Permission to use this in our report in school, thank you!!
Sure, please go ahead, Grace!
Excellent Job ma'am! I really understand it thank u ♥️
You're very much welcome!
Very well explained. Useful to society.
So nice of you. Thank you, Suzana!
Thank you very much it's really help me a lot
Ethics are the study of consequential human behaviour using concepts of good and evil as parameters.
Thank you. Exquisite!
Your lecture is more easy to understand thanks for uploading this video!
You're welcome, Prabhu. Many thanks too for the inspiring feedback. Best wishes!
He
Please do not stop posting this video
hi Sadhna, yes, we are working on it. thanks for the reminder.
Ethics is not about right or wrong but more precisely it is about properness. Is it proper or improper.
Well explained 👏 👌 👍
It's very helpful video
3. What is your understanding of applied ethics?
As discussed in the video, applied ethics guides individuals in their choice of action. It is commonly observed with the individuals suffering from a moral problem like abortion or euthanasia. Applied ethics attempt to resolve the conflicting issues that surrounds the particular moral problems.
Thanks be to God. Thank youuu!
thank you.....you are always the best and your videos are explanatory.... this has helped
Thanks heaps for your inspiring comments, James. Best wishes!
Wow this is so good I now know what are ethics and I love it :D
thanks for your inspiring comments, Sanjida Parvin. glad to know our video helps. cheers!
We have to answer three questions to consider our action is moral. This is an isolated incident. Definitely our reaction will be of exceptional nature. Otherwise there is no such thing as freewill which is the gift of God. Any way the questions are A..What is motive behind the action ?
B...Is the reason is universally acceptable? C.. killing is immoral then prevention is moral. In the said example the person involved is killed to prevent further murders not only in the present but in future also. .killing is immoral but here we are forced to choose between killing a person and allowing him to murder. We have freewill to choose either of them and there is no question any doubt. . If we don't act we will be committing a sin of far reaching consequences.
Great insight, Rajendra Rajassingan. Thanks heaps. Cheers!
Thanks very much for making this video.great...Ive learn more about ethics.
no worries, Caffey Cesar. we are glad you found our videos helpful. best wishes!
Favorite subject ko yan slamat sa notes.
You're welcome, mate. Cheers!
Thank you so very much!! 🙏🏼❤️🙌💯
no worries, mate!
Wow! This is great! 😍 I enjoyed and learned so much on this video. Thanks
Thank you so much for your wonderful comments, Aminah. Cheers!
thank you for your great explanation and real information about ethics. am doing bioethics course and would like some information about it if it possible.
thanks
You're welcome, jibril. Cheers!
You may view our compilation of video lectures in Ethics here: ruclips.net/video/ScvJfxSuYB4/видео.html
the music, voice and drawing of girl combo make me feel like im being abducted by aliens and being taught what they learned from us
oh...
Thanks a lot...very substantial
You're welcome, Regvil. We are delighted you found our video helpful. Best wishes!
Thank you I learned so much in your content and using it in my teaching
No worries, mate. Best wishes!
Thankful
Thanks at least now am trying to get to know the meaning of ethics and mortality
Great i like so much more learn thank you for sharing this ethics.
Many thanks for you very positive feedback, Margie. Cheers!
Hello - Great work. BUT something confused me A LOT.
"the action of killing the terrorist is wrong according to metaethics" - Metaethics??? (does metaethics care about that?)
It is wrong according to Kantian deontology/ethics but not according to Utilitarianism - both are ethical theories (under the category Normative ethics).
The last slide is very confusing/wrong - or i totally misunderstood the whole thing. :D
Watching this video for the last minute before midterm exam😩
I'm only here because of online class. Wish that they make videos like this.
thanks Jones
very well said
Thank you! This video helped me so much :)
No worries, Gloria Cabrera. We are glad you found our videos helpful. All the best!
Blessed to know this❤
Thanks Sagar! Cheers!
Ethics has limited use for logic and truth and is more the realm of opinion and instinct. For instance, the golden rule and happiness are a matter of opinion.
Good work
Thank you so much for the video..it will help me in my philosophy assignment. If i may ask What is aesthetics?
Hi Gofaona Mokgothu, many thanks for your inspiring comments. We are glad you found our videos helpful. By the way, aesthetics is that branch of philosophy that studies the nature, meaning, and dynamics of beauty. We hope this helps. Cheers!
@@PHILOnotes Thanx it does help☺
complex lesson but interesting
Indeed! :)
Thanks mam, this is so helpful 🙂🖤...
No worries, Moon Vlogs. Cheers!
@@PHILOnotes ☺️❤️❤️
All was well until the example of police officer. It says according to meta it is wrong which is completely nonsensical thing to say. Actually meta ethics is the only means to understand actions as ethical or not as normative ethics is simply synthesis of meta into daily life
oh, thank you for your brilliant thoughts, Yusuf. we will address this concern asap. cheers!
Gracias, esto sera muy útil para mi examen. Buena música de fondo y narración.
You're welcome, Diilerk!
Ethics is a concept currently In extinction... or perhaps having once had Ethics... the awareness now realizes the profound lack of them.
There is NO CHANGE in Do No Harm and Do Harm/Destroy..Never has, Never Will Be!
yeah...
You are amazing!
thanks a heaps, Slick Vick Anokwuru!
Brilliant
Thanks.
Very good presentation
Thanks heaps, Samnang, for your generous comments. All the best!
Ma'am these lectures r very beneficial but i didn't find the lecture of socialization from your channel so please help me regarding this
thanks a heap, Muhammad, for your very inspiring comments. by the way, what do you mean by "socialization" in this context? for example, are talking about socialization in "education" or socialization from the vantage point of sociology?
Good lecture
I always cant finish listening to this cause i always fell asleep half way through😭
Online class led me here🤗
Enjoy learning!
thank you , it was simple and easy to understand, well explain
Thank you, mate, for your very inspiring comments!
Principles of organization structure
good i have learned a lot from this txs
many thanks for your generous comments, Micheal. cheers!
@@PHILOnotes i attend all the video i got knowledge which help me more than i attend the class 1 year
@@michealdesta1851 Glad to hear that, Micheal. Best wishes!
Thank you so much ma'am.....
You're welcome, Sankhayan. Cheers!
very helpful, keep it up
Many thanks, James Dominic, for your inspiring comments. Cheers!
Thanks, I got the concept
No worries, Gale. Best wishes!
If we have a right to own wealth, to own more property than needed to have a comfortable life, than we have a right to do harm and humanity is domed to suffer extinction by global warming. On the other hand, if our wealth belongs to those suffering hunger, than humanity has some chance to survive.
yeah, indeed. thanks.
It is a good lecher best explanation for ethics 10 Q
Thank you so much!
No worries, Ella Mae!
You may view our compilation of video lectures in Ethics here: ruclips.net/video/ScvJfxSuYB4/видео.html
Thanks 😊. I'm happy to be part of your learners. Please prepare for us about epistemology if possible
in philippine , when you remove letter "S" in ethics , then it will run quickly.
Beautiful ❤️
Is ignoring questions ethical or unethical?
there are things that we simply have to do outside the bounds of morality, and i think one of them is ignoring questions. it may not be proper or appropriate in human relations, but i have the right to ignore questions, especially if i am not legally bound to do so.
Class is lit🔥
I am not sure where to find the transcript for the video on Ethics - Any suggestions please
it's available at philonotes.com. just type "What is Ethics Philonotes"
Wao its great info
Thanks Aazz!
Thank you
No worries, Sajad. Cheers!
Namaskar mam. Pls more video on medeval philosophy
Sure, soon, Kunu! cheers!
you're wrong in the end, metaethics does not judge action if they are right or wrong,
metaethics asks the question : what do mean by good ?
the two major ethical theories are deontology and consequentialism :
deontology would that killing is always wrong,
consequentialism would say (maybe) that saving lives by killing one or two person is morally permissible or actually good.
ah ok, thanks
Why do people always get this WRONG? In philosophy there are specific sets of Principles in Ethics. In Philosophy there are at least 4 main branches of Ethics that are taught: Descriptive Ethics, Normative Ethics, Meta Ethic and Applied Ethics. All of these are well defined. Normative Ethics is the specific branch of Philosophy that covers "MORALITY" and is not anything like you described. What you described is "Descriptive Ethics" which is not part of actual Philosophy departments in any University. Descriptive Ethics is closer to Psychology & Anthropology which is why it is seen as SUBJECTIVE and useless. Descriptive Ethics says that some authority figure gets to make the rules essentially ---hint to why this is SUBJECTIVE! You will NOT find this definition in "NORMATIVE ETHICS". When Philosophers speak to others on their LEVEL about "Morality" they exclusively speak about NORMATIVE ETHICS. When teachers speak on "morality" they often do what you did and NOT EVEN MENTION NORMATIVE ETHICS correctly. Normative means there is a systematic way --not a subjective way to a "UNIVERSAL SET OF RULES" in a given domain. What good is Morality if it does not apply everywhere on Earth? We already have systems like this why do we need another WORD or TERMINOLOGY for what we already have words for? Morality ought to be a UNIVERSAL SET OF RULES & PRINCIPLES that govern all people otherwise what is the point of it? Ethics is subjectivism basically based on what you define here. Ethics is based on social norms NOT morality. Ethics rules that can apply in NY can exist but those rules do not apply and will not work in Spain. Why study Ethics again? Morality should be studied because it differs from Ethics as it applies UNIVERSALLY where Ethics applies to smaller groups and not to everyone at the same time. If you do not make this distinction EARLY then why do this? Meta Ethics in Philosophy is SEMANTIC; It is purely about the language used in the field of Normative Ethics. Meta Ethics is not behavior evaluative such as act x is immoral. Meta Ethics is a meta language only. Where did you get these definitions?
I still confused what are the similarity and the sameness between ethics and morality? Anyway your video are the best! Thanks for doing this.
Ethics is study...Morality is practice...
all the best, Rose!
Thanks Moshe
Since i dont believe in free will ethics and morality has a very different assumptions. The evolution of behavior in our inborn behavior and in the evolution of society drive miral behavior. Whatever helps survival largly wins. Empath for example may have survival value as seen in hurd animals where the older, stronger adults protect the weaker younger members.
thank you !! ❤️❤️❤️
No problem, trashyvibez. Cheers!
I find the musical (?) soundtrack distracting and annoying. What is its purpose?