It's a race to the bottom like every industry now. I've moved on from gaming to other hobbies now, it's kinda sad but all good things have to come to an end.
Just look at RDR2 dude, that shit is open-world AAA, and has so much fucking details. It plays and feels like AAA game which lot of games lack the atmosphere of despite label of "yeah this is AAA game" from devs.
wait until those dumbasses realise that rocksteady used unreal engine 3 but a modified version but nonetheless the 3rd engine for arkham knight and that batmans cape has more polygons than the whole duration of arkham asylum also major triple a titles were using the 4th engine
They were in an unwinnable situation, they were told to basically follow rocksteady with a similar game but they aren't rocksteady. Random devs can't possibly replicate a system built on years of experience. Worked as a senior staff in graphics design for 8 years and I have plenty of memories being asked the impossible.
Honestly as games get more and more realistic with better and better engines, I doubt we'll see a major difference in graphics for at least a couple years unless a miracle breakthrough happens. It's much easier to go from blocky models to semi realistic people then to go from semi realistic to actually life like. The main differences from Arkham Knight to Gotham is mainly just game design directing differences, not like how technology has regressed or anything.
We are at a prime time for major improvements. Consoles have the new next gen hardware, next gen engines are emerging that take game development to the next level while making it easier than ever. Any low quality product now is the fault of corporate greed and consumer complacency. For example, UE5 has tools to generate life like models in your browser, completely overhauled what was the LOD system and removed that entire side of development, improving performance greatly and allowing for lifelike models and life size scale. It has the ability to photo scan assets, it has major shading effects built in that are simply enabled with check boxes. It has an AI system that allows for realistic density of both vehicles and on-foot NPC’s. Animations are fully dynamic and adjust automatically to fit any variation, and many more features. All of these can be used in conjunction with AI tools to further simplify development. The ease of which you can enable and disable effects also means you can cater to people with better hardware without sacrificing lower end users, and vice versa.
I think companies are trynna focus on graphic way too much instead of actual game mechanics. kinda like making a beautiful shiny car from the outside, but with a dog shit engine that can barely drive. Like rlly dud I don’t wanna look at it I wanna drive it
I don't agree with that take, if AAA companies want to do open world games they have to accept that alot more effort needs to be put into everything to make the world feel full and explorable. IMO The only companies that know how to do this is PlayStation, FromSoftware and Ubisoft (although Ubisoft is pretty cut and paste with those game) and for a golden standard rockstar is by far the kings of open worlds and understand the time that's required for open world games spending like 9 years on RDR2 and possibly longer on GTA 6
okay... you cant compare a bike vs a literal tank and btw the game isnt that terrible... people are just hating on it for no reason, relax... ive played and its really fun, the combat is different cuz they are no where near as good as batman, not supposed to be, it takes all four of them to be anywhere near. The mechanics are barely different and people just see the " bad " parts cuz its cool to hate it now Also back when the Arkham series came out the gaming industry was LEAGUES different, they didnt have people freaking out and needing it NOW they didnt HAVE to make millions and millions of dollars just ot keep going, 7-10 year ago it was completely different. When i see them side by side i see no difference cuz they arent supposed to be the same game or same universe or same anything except concept wise. Different art, different direction, different style. So comparing this to old arkham games makes no sense, they didnt want it to be a copy and they didnt make it a copy. It would have been boring if you could slap around everyone like its nothing, have no progression and be able to decimate and blow through everything with any hero and it would make difference who you played and nothing would feel rewarding or have any point. im sick of people hating on games cuz each and every game doesnt have a perfect story, perfect mechanics, perfect performance up to 200fps, amazing and perfect progression and feeling. its so damn stupid, i played it as its supposed to be...different than arkham games and its awesome and the story is WAY better than Arkham games.
The Devs ain't goona see this lil bro. The game's trash. They saw The Avengers game and tried to make it with Batman theme but then they saw how hard it flopped so they hastily made it a single player. It was an easy cash grab then, now and will be.
I have only seen trailers and this video and it looks garbo. If you want good super hero games play the Arkham games, the spider-man games, and the guardian’s of the galaxy game. (Of course you can have your own opinions, these r just my recommendations.)
I have seen Girlfriendreviews video on the game and it looks pretty bad. If you enjoy it that is fine but many people don't and it is not only bandwagon either because the pre release reviews were already bad. Those people formed their own opinion and didn't jump on a bandwagon.
Arkham Knight looks amazing. Game prices are fucking criminal for the lack of quality they have these days.
True, 16 times the detail
@@DrOmnarael Oh no no no
Then pirate
@@DrOmnarael tell me lies tell me sweet little lies PepeLaugh
It's a race to the bottom like every industry now. I've moved on from gaming to other hobbies now, it's kinda sad but all good things have to come to an end.
Actually a non brain dead take
yeah he somehow pulled off a decent take for once. i actually listened to this one.
RDR2 and Elden Ring being put in the same category as Horizon Forbidden West and the new Watch Dog game are the reason why we need new categories
Bro Horizon FW is a better game in almost every respect besides the story isn't as original. It's a good sequel
Ur delusional forbidden west looks amazing
@@justaweeb1884 and plays like every other game in the last 10 years. compared to elden ring i wouldn't even call it a game.
@@Maun000 horizon fw is just a texture pack for rise of the tomb raider lol
I was laughing my ass off when I saw HFW in so many categories. Even Stray had a better run then that shit.
Crazy how much better Arkham Knight looks and plays. Wtf is happening with gaming
Game devs getting lazy...
@@PAN-THEE-AVENGER yep
wish X would play through the arkham games. Chat would be full of GIGACHAD spam.
glad that BatChest kinda died out
Just look at RDR2 dude, that shit is open-world AAA, and has so much fucking details. It plays and feels like AAA game which lot of games lack the atmosphere of despite label of "yeah this is AAA game" from devs.
Arkham Knight is a good example of proper design thinking where they do more with less. The game looks gorgeous despite coming out in 2015.
The amount of people I’ve seen defending the corp on the original video (and not understanding game development or engine features) is astounding.
wait until those dumbasses realise that rocksteady used unreal engine 3 but a modified version but nonetheless the 3rd engine for arkham knight and that batmans cape has more polygons than the whole duration of arkham asylum also major triple a titles were using the 4th engine
WBgames dropped the ball so hard with Gotham Knights.
They were in an unwinnable situation, they were told to basically follow rocksteady with a similar game but they aren't rocksteady. Random devs can't possibly replicate a system built on years of experience. Worked as a senior staff in graphics design for 8 years and I have plenty of memories being asked the impossible.
OMGG BOBAAH !! VIDEO GAME CHARACTERS GET ME ROCK HARD !! TIME TO BOOBAH OMGG I WILL DIE ALONE !! BOBAAA
Honestly as games get more and more realistic with better and better engines, I doubt we'll see a major difference in graphics for at least a couple years unless a miracle breakthrough happens. It's much easier to go from blocky models to semi realistic people then to go from semi realistic to actually life like. The main differences from Arkham Knight to Gotham is mainly just game design directing differences, not like how technology has regressed or anything.
We are at a prime time for major improvements. Consoles have the new next gen hardware, next gen engines are emerging that take game development to the next level while making it easier than ever. Any low quality product now is the fault of corporate greed and consumer complacency. For example, UE5 has tools to generate life like models in your browser, completely overhauled what was the LOD system and removed that entire side of development, improving performance greatly and allowing for lifelike models and life size scale. It has the ability to photo scan assets, it has major shading effects built in that are simply enabled with check boxes. It has an AI system that allows for realistic density of both vehicles and on-foot NPC’s. Animations are fully dynamic and adjust automatically to fit any variation, and many more features. All of these can be used in conjunction with AI tools to further simplify development. The ease of which you can enable and disable effects also means you can cater to people with better hardware without sacrificing lower end users, and vice versa.
5:33 Someone's a Jadez sub. She's a vibe.
Alright
take a shower
Arkham Knight looks fire
I wonder how the suicide squad game will be since it's the arkham series devs, might be good
lol
@@dyingbreathlol true
If the AAA game is Open World then its a Recipe for absolute Disaster these Days🤣
The game takes place in Ohio
I skipped over more than half the video
adhd andy
I think companies are trynna focus on graphic way too much instead of actual game mechanics.
kinda like making a beautiful shiny car from the outside, but with a dog shit engine that can barely drive. Like rlly dud I don’t wanna look at it I wanna drive it
Good take Pog
I don't agree with that take, if AAA companies want to do open world games they have to accept that alot more effort needs to be put into everything to make the world feel full and explorable. IMO The only companies that know how to do this is PlayStation, FromSoftware and Ubisoft (although Ubisoft is pretty cut and paste with those game) and for a golden standard rockstar is by far the kings of open worlds and understand the time that's required for open world games spending like 9 years on RDR2 and possibly longer on GTA 6
Arkham night looks like it has ray tracing on compared to this one.
Arkham knight doesn't have ray tracing
Same visuals, half the fps, 😎
*Worse visuals, worse fps
🤓 HOOOLLLY
Kappa
Common Leslie L
I think both of these games are great considering they’re free
its not free lmao its 70$
where tf you get "free" from. The new one is free of content
even if they were, which they are not, how tf could you possibly justify Gotham Knight's looking worse than a game that's 7 years older??
i got the arkham trilogy and lego batman trilogy bundle free on epic games like 2 year ago
@@Zigeuninja no one said anything about justifying the new one lmao
okay... you cant compare a bike vs a literal tank and btw the game isnt that terrible... people are just hating on it for no reason, relax... ive played and its really fun, the combat is different cuz they are no where near as good as batman, not supposed to be, it takes all four of them to be anywhere near.
The mechanics are barely different and people just see the " bad " parts cuz its cool to hate it now
Also back when the Arkham series came out the gaming industry was LEAGUES different, they didnt have people freaking out and needing it NOW they didnt HAVE to make millions and millions of dollars just ot keep going, 7-10 year ago it was completely different. When i see them side by side i see no difference cuz they arent supposed to be the same game or same universe or same anything except concept wise. Different art, different direction, different style. So comparing this to old arkham games makes no sense, they didnt want it to be a copy and they didnt make it a copy.
It would have been boring if you could slap around everyone like its nothing, have no progression and be able to decimate and blow through everything with any hero and it would make difference who you played and nothing would feel rewarding or have any point. im sick of people hating on games cuz each and every game doesnt have a perfect story, perfect mechanics, perfect performance up to 200fps, amazing and perfect progression and feeling. its so damn stupid, i played it as its supposed to be...different than arkham games and its awesome and the story is WAY better than Arkham games.
The Devs ain't goona see this lil bro. The game's trash. They saw The Avengers game and tried to make it with Batman theme but then they saw how hard it flopped so they hastily made it a single player. It was an easy cash grab then, now and will be.
I have only seen trailers and this video and it looks garbo. If you want good super hero games play the Arkham games, the spider-man games, and the guardian’s of the galaxy game. (Of course you can have your own opinions, these r just my recommendations.)
I have seen Girlfriendreviews video on the game and it looks pretty bad. If you enjoy it that is fine but many people don't and it is not only bandwagon either because the pre release reviews were already bad. Those people formed their own opinion and didn't jump on a bandwagon.
Imagine malding over a fucking video game
Who is he talking to?
Gta 4 still better