LK99 -- A new room temperature superconductor?

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 5 янв 2025

Комментарии • 1,5 тыс.

  • @SabineHossenfelder
    @SabineHossenfelder  Год назад

    New! This video comes with a quiz: quizwithit.com/start_thequiz/1694245422338x824944770471511200

  • @kullervoson2726
    @kullervoson2726 Год назад +55

    "I have found that article somewhat difficult to understand." Sabine, you are the QUEEN of understatement. Never change!

    • @terrylandess6072
      @terrylandess6072 Год назад +3

      I appreciate she doesn't use the lowest common denominator where humor is involved.

  • @NeonVisual
    @NeonVisual Год назад +753

    The catch is that the temperature of the room needs to be near absolute zero.

  • @-feonix48-47
    @-feonix48-47 Год назад +141

    Man what an episode, wild couple weeks for science been waiting for this one for a bit

  • @javiercarrera
    @javiercarrera Год назад +1516

    I was anxiously waiting for Sabine's take on LK99 for a trustworthy no BS input

    • @cristianproust
      @cristianproust Год назад

      This time it is the BS the key. Because there was a patent involved and there is a lot of irregularities. It is a pretty important field right now and it seems strange that they would like to destroy their careers for nothing to gain (if is not replicable they are done).
      This is the kind of thing that you always find in a lab, and you would repeat the experiments many, many times to check that it is not a fluke. And 100% of the time is nonsense.
      That is why the circumstances surrounding it are strange. If I was them I would secure investors for the industrial process and assure being filthy rich first. The Nobel would be inevitable in every case.
      It might be that the one guy was crazy, but this drama apparently started in 2020 and there is the patent. This time seems different. It has my attention, that is for sure

    • @mobo8933
      @mobo8933 Год назад +89

      Fr bro she's literally the best science news channel

    • @maxlin5998
      @maxlin5998 Год назад +114

      Anton Petrov also did a nice cover on this too

    • @wyqtor
      @wyqtor Год назад +38

      Sabine was bound to be found in the "it's so over" area of that graph

    • @lilitLun
      @lilitLun Год назад +4

      Me too! 😂

  • @rismosch
    @rismosch Год назад +21

    6:16 I recited this spell aswell, and a room temperature super conductor appeared from thin air in front of me. Looks like I am the one who's going to win the nobel prize soon. Thanks Sabine!

  • @DeejayHyplektro
    @DeejayHyplektro Год назад +3

    awesome to see you being sponsored by a morning newsletter I've been reading for about 2 years now! and now I've found your channel with even more awesome science news! loving it !

  • @itfrombit
    @itfrombit Год назад +618

    Whoever finds a material that is superconducting at room temperature and normal pressure can definitely turn down the Nobel Prize, because this discovery would be greater than any prize that could be awarded to anyone.

    • @Fantastic_Mr_Fox
      @Fantastic_Mr_Fox Год назад +106

      especially if it's easy to produce
      this is too good to be true

    • @clickbait2000
      @clickbait2000 Год назад +26

      Yeah, just like cold fusion ... Don't hold your breath! :-)

    • @cristianproust
      @cristianproust Год назад +36

      It is suspicious, because there was a patent involved and there is a lot of irregularities. It is a pretty important field right now and it seems strange that they would like to destroy their careers for nothing to gain (if is not replicable they are done).
      This is the kind of thing that you always find in a lab, and you would repeat the experiments many, many times to check that it is not a fluke. And 100% of the time is nonsense.
      That is why the circumstances surrounding it are strange. If I was them I would secure investors for the industrial process and assure being filthy rich first. The Nobel would be inevitable in every case.
      It might be that the one guy was crazy, but this drama apparently started in 2020 and there is the patent. This time seems different. It has my attention, that is for sure

    • @nathanielmathews2617
      @nathanielmathews2617 Год назад +11

      ​@@clickbait2000I handle worse heartbrake than this. I've got my hopium cap on. I understand the reality, but this tech could not have come at a luckier time than now when we have to tackle global warming

    • @jamescunningham8092
      @jamescunningham8092 Год назад +5

      @@cristianproust it’s not *that* surprising they might not have tried to cash in on it. Others who have made massive discoveries in academia - blue leds come to mind - never got absolutely filthy rich.
      I still think this is bullcrap, though.

  • @MrHichammohsen1
    @MrHichammohsen1 Год назад +74

    This episode was a rollercoaster to me!
    Thank you again and again Sabine.

  • @BigZebraCom
    @BigZebraCom Год назад +812

    I'm worried that this room temperature superconductor is just cold fusion all over again. Please don't be cold fusion all over again.

    • @SabineHossenfelder
      @SabineHossenfelder  Год назад +512

      my thought exactly :/

    • @BigZebraCom
      @BigZebraCom Год назад +265

      @@SabineHossenfelder It's official! Senpai Noticed Me !!!

    • @GBR9794
      @GBR9794 Год назад +8

      @@BigZebraCom omg what do you do?

    • @StephenThompsonAU
      @StephenThompsonAU Год назад +91

      Morgan Freeman (Narrator): Of course we all know it was cold fusion all over again.

    • @erkinalp
      @erkinalp Год назад +8

      @@SabineHossenfelder cold fusion would be useful if we manage to discover a way to sufficiently regulate it to the point we could produce water and steel from hydrogen alone.

  • @Gaswafers
    @Gaswafers Год назад +553

    Pretty sure a room temperature, ambient pressure superconductor would be worth enough Nobel Prizes for every single person involved in the research.

    • @YayComity
      @YayComity Год назад +77

      Unfortunately there is a rule that it can be shared among at most three people. So there's a very real concern that completely deserving people could be excluded. It would be sad, and a scar on the award, if such a monumental discovery brought that flaw to the forefront in a monumental way. I wonder if that played any role in the quirky publication history and disputes??

    • @Spruce_Bringsteen
      @Spruce_Bringsteen Год назад +45

      ​@@YayComitytheres a reason why the paper only had three names on it

    • @kullervoson2726
      @kullervoson2726 Год назад +41

      That is a very valid point. But as a patent attorney, my view is that a room temperature, ambient pressure superconductor would worth enough MONEY that King Midas would be envious of the potential lucre--the potential $$$$$ becomes a polestar for many people for whom ethics and reputation are just abstractions. I've seen it before--I worked for big Pharma.

    •  Год назад +7

      ​@CheatOnlyDeath so bad god created the nobel prize this way so that rules are impossible to change ;-(

    • @善良的事就交给其他人
      @善良的事就交给其他人 Год назад +11

      Please don't humiliate him with the Nobel Prize, create a prize in his name

  • @andygoldensixties4201
    @andygoldensixties4201 Год назад +6

    When I hear of something "new and exceptional" in science I'm always happy, and my second think is "Will it pass Sabine's scrutiny"? And it does not in too many cases, showing how premature and superficial are many claims. Science is hard and the rules are strict. Thank you for this work in support of reliable research, Dr. Hossenfelder, maybe you gain some enemies in the community of researchers, but also gain our esteem.

  • @aleattorium
    @aleattorium Год назад +64

    9:41: this is very useful for robotics applications. You can carry small shapes, place them wherever you need and then "deploy"

    • @cobra6481
      @cobra6481 Год назад

      spiderbots with squirt guns! 😆

  • @user-yw8lj6io6l
    @user-yw8lj6io6l Год назад +15

    ah, sabine, you are so delightful. how insightful and witty you are! thank you for the work you do to make science accessible

  • @DanteTheEgregore
    @DanteTheEgregore Год назад +26

    I've been anxiously googling lk-99 every few hours. For the people who haven't been keeping up with the latest, there's been one claim of successful reproduction, one claim the effect appears to work in simulation, and one claim of unsuccessful reproduction to my knowledge (mind you these are all preliminary). One thing to keep in mind is that apparently each round of baking only produces relatively small amounts of the material, so "it has defects" might be a bit of an understatement.

    • @eyescreamcake
      @eyescreamcake Год назад +7

      TWO claims that it works in simulation

    • @acksawblack
      @acksawblack Год назад +11

      @@eyescreamcake4 now and all independent of each other!

    • @Mysterio2243
      @Mysterio2243 Год назад +1

      @@acksawblack yes it seems to be legit..

    • @jtillman8251
      @jtillman8251 Год назад +2

      So maybe it's the new graphene rather than the new cold fusion?

    • @solconcordia4315
      @solconcordia4315 Год назад

      Maybe the U. S. A. love of pizza 🍕 and the subsequent drive to make good pizza pays off again in low-earth orbit.
      Very good pizza ovens in microgravity can grow very perfect and pure crystalline materials. We
      're not building in orbit yet another SR-71 Blackbird
      !

  • @spazoq
    @spazoq Год назад +3

    Breakthroughs rarely happen, if at all. When someone says they have massively improved something it usually means either they have not, or the marketing department has gotten ahold of the announcement and is making a huge deal out of something that"s actually smaller, and has taken years to accomplish with small improvements every year.

  • @inventorbrothers7053
    @inventorbrothers7053 Год назад +2

    I was soo waiting for this video 😊

  • @someguyusingyt9091
    @someguyusingyt9091 Год назад +8

    Been waiting for your view on LK-99! Nice!

  • @Teaspun
    @Teaspun Год назад +89

    It's easy to guess what happened with the Korean papers. Kwon was getting canned from the research team and stood to receive zero credit for any new discovery. So he said "FU all" in Korean and put the paper on arXiv to forever etch his name on the record. He succeeded.

    • @thulyblu5486
      @thulyblu5486 Год назад +28

      Good old office politics ruining everything like always

    • @jonnysith
      @jonnysith Год назад

      ​@@thulyblu5486good old human nature** this a trillion dollar discovery. You can imagine all the dollars signs blinding them.

    • @gbormann71
      @gbormann71 Год назад

      If it turns out they fudged or fabricated the data, would he stay so eager?

    • @vitalyl1327
      @vitalyl1327 Год назад +7

      Good job. Now Kwon is unemployable for the rest of his life, and the other unfortunate co-authors have their reputations tainted, even despite having no intention whatsoever to publish that crap.

    • @e.d.1642
      @e.d.1642 Год назад +6

      Apparently Lee said they fired him in March because he was always trying to go against the way Kim was taking. But it's Kim intuitions who were right. Seems Kwon tried to secure a place by getting out a paper that wasn't finished with his name on it.

  • @chrislambe400
    @chrislambe400 Год назад +546

    Major scientific breakthrough in the news - no problem wait, a few days for Sabine or Anton to sort it out.

    • @hugmynutus
      @hugmynutus Год назад +1

      Anton can't even quote the paper verbatim he's discussing. All while he makes huge mistakes discussing the science in the paper.

    • @fss1704
      @fss1704 Год назад +6

      The video shows pyrolythic graphite, it's not special.

    • @tenbear5
      @tenbear5 Год назад +6

      Anton? hahahaha 🤣🤣🤣

    • @aylbdrmadison1051
      @aylbdrmadison1051 Год назад +32

      @@tenbear5 _"Anton? hahahaha 🤣🤣🤣"_
      Well that told me all I need to know about your opinion. I appreciate.

    • @tenbear5
      @tenbear5 Год назад

      @@aylbdrmadison1051 yes, he’s a pro gamer who makes content. His popular science appeals to remedials.

  • @alaeifR
    @alaeifR Год назад +17

    The aesthetics of this production is just mad! Reminds me of late 90s TV. Quite fun.

  • @jimmyzhao2673
    @jimmyzhao2673 Год назад +12

    Yay ! I was so looking forward to hearing Sabine's opinion on this announcement. I trust her reporting.
    I'm on tenterhooks to discover if the room temperature superconductor is the real deal.

    • @fss1704
      @fss1704 Год назад +4

      It's been 4 days and no one reproduced it, everyone that tried failed and still didn't publish because they need to do verification, if this was real and people got positive results it would be out already. The video is indistinguishable from pyrolytic graphite, so don't hold your breath.

    • @proto-geek248
      @proto-geek248 Год назад +2

      Never gonna happen.

  • @darkpistol96
    @darkpistol96 Год назад +2

    This channel is great, good job prof. Sabine, I am enjoying your videos and your sense of humor.

  • @55james
    @55james Год назад +28

    Thank you. When I saw the superconductor claim in the news, I thought “ I don’t trust it. I’ll wait till Sabine talks about it “

  • @AroundPhysics
    @AroundPhysics Год назад +1

    It happens that I have my PhD from Amsterdam based on experimental superconductivity, time ago. These 2 Korean papers are not impressing me. Differences between both are devastating reputation of authors. We had many cases of claims for Hi T superconductivity. My impression is that the authors do not even have good skills in preparing graphics for presentation. The last paper presents a "Meissner" effect that is so small and measured very inaccurately. If they asked me for advise ;)

  • @luckybarrel7829
    @luckybarrel7829 Год назад +9

    I'm glad you addressed AMOC news. Too many headlines about the gulf stream collapsing by 2025.

  • @xxiemeciel
    @xxiemeciel Год назад +1

    was waiting for Sabine since I saw the title in the news ^^ didn't even wasted time to read the article lol

  • @Electr0chem1stry
    @Electr0chem1stry Год назад +4

    Beautiful, was wondering when we’d hear your take on the big news!

  • @BubbaFranks-TheSwordDragon
    @BubbaFranks-TheSwordDragon Год назад

    I am so glad that you did a segment on LK99. The barrage of videos I was being given all seemed overly sensational and too optimistic to be taken seriously. Your sober take on the material is greatly appreciated.

  • @RyanCoomer
    @RyanCoomer Год назад +59

    I sneak my corndogs into a buffet and then watch others eat my corndogs thinking they part of buffet

    • @bobbyd.roberson5588
      @bobbyd.roberson5588 Год назад +6

      Not all heroes wear capes o7

    • @okok2023
      @okok2023 Год назад +5

      War criminal

    • @bubaks2
      @bubaks2 Год назад

      Lmfao dude

    • @johnfindlay3454
      @johnfindlay3454 Год назад +1

      Is this process allegorical in any way, and does it potentially lead to the receipt of a Nobel Prize?

    • @RyanCoomer
      @RyanCoomer Год назад

      @@realitywave I am mental health. I'm a mirror

  • @Neloish
    @Neloish Год назад +2

    I been avoiding this topic until your video because your the only one I trust!

  • @whitlermountain7198
    @whitlermountain7198 Год назад +4

    'GEDI senses disturbances in the forest.'
    Excellent writing lmao

  • @vzxvzvcxasd7109
    @vzxvzvcxasd7109 Год назад +1

    From now on, all headline grabbing papers should go through a peer review process that involves live streaming.
    So much more verifiability and no cherry picking data

  • @TheDr00g
    @TheDr00g Год назад +10

    I work with NMR magnets and talked recently to a technician of a big magnet manufacturer. He told me that they are working on a prototype of a mid/high-field magnet with a coil made of a new alloy which is already superconductive in liquid nitrogen temperatures. This is not exactly ambient temperatures, however becoming independent of (liquid) helium is a big step, since it becomes inreasingly more expensive and difficult to purchase. The same goes for MRI machines in hospitals.

    • @Validole
      @Validole Год назад

      I'm pretty sure superconductors at liquid nitrogen temp have been a thing for a while now, I remember demoing a puck of the stuff to high schools students 15-ish years ago. But I think that was ceramic, maybe the advancement is a more malleable thing useful for wire production?

  • @Lexoka
    @Lexoka Год назад +1

    This video includes the best description of meteorology I've ever heard.

  • @andresmontagut7754
    @andresmontagut7754 Год назад +8

    One big thought i got in all these is that if it is a new superconductor it will definitely be a new type, we know type 1 workarounds with the BCS theory, we don't know how type 2 work until today, we do see that Meissner effect tends to be more ineffective with higer temperatures, being type 1 perfect diamagnetics, type 2 not so much letting magetic fields that allow quantum lock. So why a new type RTSC wont present an altered form of Meissner effect? I think the video isnt a let down i need to see resistance measurments.

  • @hagopbulbulian6642
    @hagopbulbulian6642 Год назад +1

    Thank you for your time making this videos which help regular people , and even experts but as usual I have questions on your video

    • @hagopbulbulian6642
      @hagopbulbulian6642 Год назад

      For example the idea of time hameltonian ,the solid state of lk-99 , the superposition and Dirac equations, ... and more

  • @PeterPan-vt6sy
    @PeterPan-vt6sy Год назад +26

    You and Anton make the best science news videos

  • @adrianscarlett
    @adrianscarlett Год назад +2

    3:10 a minor correction: There are seven authors in total, young-wan kwon being replaced by hyun-tak Kim on the latest submission.

  • @rollerr
    @rollerr Год назад +17

    LK99 is looking very promising! Exciting. I don't share your skepticism re: it being a diamagnet. One of the scientists involved authored a paper regarding diamagnetism, so I don't think he would mistake LK99 for a diamagnet.

    • @fewwiggle
      @fewwiggle Год назад +3

      If I remember correctly, Fleishman and Pons were highly respected 'experts' too . . . .

    • @rollerr
      @rollerr Год назад +8

      @@fewwiggle Absolutely, the possibility that experts can be wrong is absolutely there. I'm merely stating I think it's unlikely in this case unless they've made a very massive mistake somewhere- after all, they have evidently taken measurements of conductivity that are consistent with those of a superconductor. As others have said, I suspect the issue with levitation is down to sample purity. I don't think the scientists fully understand how they created the material, especially considering they themselves admit the discovery was a bit of a mistake.

    • @Gandhi_Physique
      @Gandhi_Physique Год назад +1

      @@rollerr Whatever the case, I hope this is real.

    • @billballinger5622
      @billballinger5622 Год назад

      everything from people to water is diamagnetic

    • @zackwang9314
      @zackwang9314 Год назад

      it is not the first time south korean scientists have lied to the science world. Last time was cloning

  • @daviddodds30
    @daviddodds30 Год назад +1

    The Super Conducting Super Collider would have had an estimated 40 TeV collision energy, so maybe the University of Colorado’s discovery means that the giant empty tunnel in Texas should remain empty.

  • @rogeriopenna9014
    @rogeriopenna9014 Год назад +72

    It's worth remembering that Hyun-Tak Kim, one of the 6 co authors, wrote a paper on diamagnetic shielding for high temperature superconductors in 2001.
    It would be very weird if he didn't realize LK99 was simply diamagnetic

    • @absalomdraconis
      @absalomdraconis Год назад +13

      And Kim was supposedly involved in synthesizing the stuff in 1999 (~ 1:56 in the video), two years before the study you mention... suspicious timing, almost as if both papers are talking about the same subject, and the second came after rejecting the idea behind the first paper.

    • @eyescreamcake
      @eyescreamcake Год назад +7

      Superconductors _are_ diamagnetic. They exhibit superdiamagnetism. Flux pinning is not seen in all superconductors.

  • @hrsh6198
    @hrsh6198 Год назад

    this was fantastic! your take on the news that is just thrown out there in "science" magazines is very enlightening. than you.

  • @oohwha
    @oohwha Год назад +4

    Jedi: Can sense disturbances in the Force
    GEDI: Can sense disturbances in the Forest
    LOVE IT! 🤣🤣💖💖

  • @whiterottenrabbit
    @whiterottenrabbit Год назад +1

    4:25: this is exactly what happened last time with the supposed superconductor a room temperature and 10 kbar pressure, and nobody could replicate the results - a fact already totally forgotten by your viewers despite you reported about it only 4 months ago.

  • @b_two
    @b_two Год назад +3

    i've been eagerly awaiting sabine's take on this!

  • @throughliterarylens273
    @throughliterarylens273 Год назад +1

    I really admire your knowledge, Hardwork and wit

  • @IroAppe
    @IroAppe Год назад +6

    The approach for LK99 is interesting. So even if we don't get it now, it could be a way to eventually get there. The idea is the following: There are already superconductors at higher temperatures, but they require extremely high pressure in order to be superconducting. Those superconductors rely on a kind of quantum effect where the electrons are bundled together. The key lies in modifying the molecular structure in a way that it does that itself without the high pressure. Their idea was to replace some atoms with other atoms that take up less space / have weaker fields. That way the structure flexes and that flex apparently allows for this quantum effect to happen.
    Let's see. If it works I'm sure we will get a video of Sabine explaining that concept. If not, well, I hope that that is at least a step towards a solution sometime in the future.

    • @solconcordia4315
      @solconcordia4315 Год назад +2

      The key idea for achieving room-temperature ambient-pressure superconductivity is to create electrically charged bosonic drift.
      Electrons are fermions. It takes two of them coupled together to form an electrically charged boson.
      It takes *strong* electrical field to bind together the two electrons. Small cations can create this condition better than large ones.
      Now to drift the electrically charged bosons, we can move the electrons much easier than the cation coupling them. As long as they can get through to a nearby cation, the coupling can continue.
      To make the drifting easy for the electrons, we need to make the potential energy barrier against their tunneling thin. In a crystal lattice, making a smaller unit cell can squeeze the energy barriers into a smaller space.

    • @solconcordia4315
      @solconcordia4315 Год назад +2

      Odd number of electronic charge on a cation disqualifies it from forming an electrically charged boson. So sodium is out and magnesium is in.

  • @flaparoundfpv8632
    @flaparoundfpv8632 Год назад +1

    I was prepared to freek out about this, until I saw that material wobling around in a very conspicuously non-locked way. Pretty sure I saw simple harmonic motion in there. Damn. Always a bridesmaid..

  • @wandringhobo4321
    @wandringhobo4321 Год назад +43

    Could you still elaborate on the quantum wells and whether you think that would be plausible in theory for the superconductor?

    • @SabineHossenfelder
      @SabineHossenfelder  Год назад +64

      I find this topic super interesting and might look into this further, but it's going to take time. Not something I can pull off in a few days!

    • @alexbayan8302
      @alexbayan8302 Год назад +4

      @@SabineHossenfelder But that is the center piece of the theory behind lk-99.

    • @wandringhobo4321
      @wandringhobo4321 Год назад +4

      @@SabineHossenfelder Please I’m looking very forward to it and the story around why the authors are scrambling for publishing makes it even more interesting. The third most recently published paper has peer reviewed data which shows zero resistivity but not quite the Meisner effect. Hopefully you can another look once more labs have independent replication results. Thank you for your videos.

    • @fku7689
      @fku7689 Год назад +2

      Macro bullshit is easier to sell than micro bullshit, it is ironic that the theory is based on the quantum scale

    • @goncalovazpinto6261
      @goncalovazpinto6261 Год назад +4

      Two Bit da Vinci has a nice video that goes more in depth into the quantum wells thing.

  • @nathaniallarkin6060
    @nathaniallarkin6060 Год назад +1

    Yo, your channel is awesome!

  • @RalfStephan
    @RalfStephan Год назад +3

    Hyperloop in Munich... how long will they need to understand that the loops, i.e., curves are the problem? Did they do their homework on why previous attempts failed?

  • @Caleb-qr6lo
    @Caleb-qr6lo Год назад

    Definitely keep us up to date on this.

  • @SuperHansburger93
    @SuperHansburger93 Год назад +10

    I love this format! I hope you keep it up :)

  • @marcoottina654
    @marcoottina654 Год назад

    9:45 That folding origami is AWESOME ^_^ it could allow something fantastic in the aerospace field!

  • @SinanAkkoyun
    @SinanAkkoyun Год назад +3

    3:11 we all love Sabine for her great sense of humor

    • @kindredtoast3439
      @kindredtoast3439 Год назад +1

      Agreed. I had to pause to laugh there. And also at 9:34.

    • @SinanAkkoyun
      @SinanAkkoyun Год назад +1

      @@kindredtoast3439 Same, strangely we expect her to make jokes, they still shoot out and catch us off guard for some reason

  • @betabenja
    @betabenja Год назад +1

    hi Sabine: think you should make two 10 min videos and release them one day apart. I think it's a win-win formula upgrade.

  • @Nivola1953
    @Nivola1953 Год назад +5

    Thank you Sabine, I really like this science info format. At 15:30 the “Hyperloop” made in Germany, 🤔 MagLev trains are old news, they achieved speed of 603 km/h in 2015 and wheeled trains speed record is 574.8 km/h. The qualifying property of the Hyperloop is “under vacuum”, I saw the door looks like a hi vac system door. Did they achieve operational pressure during the test? How long it took to pump the chamber down to that state? Most importantly, are the costs and are the costs and safety risk, of hundred of kmeters long vacuum chamber being addressed and are they worth an increase of 30% of the top speed? I share Thunderf00t skepticism about the viability of an idea that’s 100 years old!

    • @NeovanGoth
      @NeovanGoth Год назад +2

      There is no Hyperloop. It's just a handy way to have an interesting project for students to work on, to get attention from the media, and to secure funding from the Bavarian state government who just loooooves things like this, no matter how ridiculous it may be. They like to present Munich as some kind of super-innovative European Silicon Valley (which admittedly is not entirely unsuccessful).

    • @jacksons1010
      @jacksons1010 Год назад +1

      Thunderf00t was rightly skeptical. Note how the companies that "invested" in hyperloop R&D have quietly evaporated, one after the other. "I swear, it's not that hard" said a famous person.

    • @foo0815
      @foo0815 Год назад

      Being a former student at TUM, I'm quite ashamed that my alma mater is involved in this nonsensical hype...

  • @klaymoon1
    @klaymoon1 Год назад +2

    A new? Wtf. There never been a room temp super conductor. The first is the right header.

  • @Streetsy
    @Streetsy Год назад +7

    I appreciate science news from a scientist. Thank you for the channel.

  • @SmithsMobile
    @SmithsMobile Год назад +2

    Been waiting for this, cant wait to watch it. ❤ Sabine 😊

  • @Bat_Boy
    @Bat_Boy Год назад +3

    Great show!

  • @mildlydazed9608
    @mildlydazed9608 Год назад

    With all the talk of Lk99 I’m glad Sabine made a video explaining it.

  • @ChrisMorton
    @ChrisMorton Год назад +9

    Those guys from cold fusion should join up with these super conductor guys, maybe they can invent time travel?

    • @SloverOfTeuth
      @SloverOfTeuth Год назад +6

      That was already invented in 2042.

    • @vftdan
      @vftdan Год назад

      "Lukewarm superconfusion"

  • @BoB-Dobbs_leaning-left
    @BoB-Dobbs_leaning-left Год назад +1

    My first thought when looking at the "superconductor" lifting on one side, as opposed to a symetrical repulsion was, they are using an asymetrical AC magnetic field but hadn't got it balanced, and the "superconductor" was, in fact, magnetic.

  • @MrHailstorm00
    @MrHailstorm00 Год назад +3

    I wonder when Sabine will do another take on LK 99, after so many other labs seem to replicate the experiment. I agree levitation != SC, but it may be a new CuO based superconductor or at least the phase diagram would be interesting.

    • @aleksfadini
      @aleksfadini Год назад

      She just retreated this on twitter.

    • @MrHailstorm00
      @MrHailstorm00 Год назад +1

      @@aleksfadini you mean she Xed?😂😂

  • @PowerScissor
    @PowerScissor Год назад +2

    People keep saying the paper for LK-99 was submitted in April.
    Was it April 1st by chance?

    • @jimmyzhao2673
      @jimmyzhao2673 Год назад +1

      Whoa ! If that little detail didn't fly past everyone.

    • @PowerScissor
      @PowerScissor Год назад +1

      @@jimmyzhao2673 I keep hearing April, but no full date.

  • @msromike123
    @msromike123 Год назад +44

    You know it's an important discovery when they start in fighting over who should get the most credit!

    • @theondono
      @theondono Год назад +5

      Big "maybe", it also shows that the lab probably has bad practices, internal feuds and poor management in general.

    • @smok4101
      @smok4101 Год назад +4

      Now we wait for the movie.

    • @scottabc72
      @scottabc72 Год назад +3

      Or there is a breakdown in the team over how to salvage years of work that likely wont lead to anything significant

    • @thatdude3977
      @thatdude3977 Год назад

      Whiye people gonna claim they discovered it 😂

    • @theondono
      @theondono Год назад +1

      @@baekdumountaintiger5701 Wait what? Since when gun powder was claimed to be a western invention?

  • @alexandrugheorghe5610
    @alexandrugheorghe5610 Год назад

    Thanks for the news. Also, I love the closed captions. So, thanks for that too. 😊

  • @johnbeyer2211
    @johnbeyer2211 Год назад +7

    I'm baffled that the Hyperloop is still being considered as something that could happen. Can you imagine the amount of g force this thing would generate? And any leak in the transport vehicle or the tube would be catastrophic.

    • @ChaoticNeutralMatt
      @ChaoticNeutralMatt Год назад

      I just translate that to actual reasonable alternatives

    • @abhinavnatarajan4180
      @abhinavnatarajan4180 Год назад +1

      Yeah but the speeds involved are similar to speeds in commercial passenger jets (I'm talking about the 800km/h figure, not transonic speeds), so wouldn't the g-force generated by acceleration to those speeds also be similar? And those jets also have to be robust against leaks and depressurisation. The technical challenges seem difficult but not insurmountable, and the aviation industry has at least partially dealt with some of the challenges.

    • @docoroc2
      @docoroc2 Год назад +2

      G-forces are related to acceleration, not velocity, so not a problem if acceleration properly controlled.

    • @johnbeyer2211
      @johnbeyer2211 Год назад

      With flight there are large amounts of area to make gradual high-speed turns. Plus, you have the friction of air and pressure to balance and control air speed. You don't have that with in vacuum tube. As for leaks. Consider the tragedy of Payne Stewart's flight. A similar disaster would shut down the entire line for potentially days or weeks. You don't have this problem with air travel. Now let's say it's the tube itself that fails. The sudden rush of atmosphere filling this vacuum tube would turn the train into the equivalent of a bullet being fired through gun barrel. @@abhinavnatarajan4180

  • @Rockyzach88
    @Rockyzach88 Год назад

    Good vid. I've been looking for some new social media / news outlets as well.

  • @fotografm
    @fotografm Год назад +6

    Fantastic watching. Your news summary is rapidly becoming the highlight of my online week !!!

  • @italickinggemo3440
    @italickinggemo3440 Год назад +1

    Sabine I luv U❤Ur videos changed my life.

  • @cubeduncertainty9401
    @cubeduncertainty9401 Год назад +53

    Never expected scientists streaming on twitch

    • @geekswithfeet9137
      @geekswithfeet9137 Год назад +7

      Honestly it’s making me want to watch twitch for the first time ever

    • @MijinLaw
      @MijinLaw Год назад +23

      I think Sabine is so right about how big this could be (even if she was saying it tongue-in-cheek). Right now, replicating experimental results is a thankless task. But if there became an interest in watching live streams (or just recordings) like this, it would bring money and exposure to this neglected, and essential, part of the scientific process.

    • @FranciscoJG
      @FranciscoJG Год назад +7

      @@MijinLaw yes, and I dare to say it could even demystify science careers for the kids. Maybe even regain some trust from general public!

    • @quillaja
      @quillaja Год назад +3

      Because having one professional full-time job isn't enough to live in this world anymore, so you need a "side hustle" just to survive.

    • @eugenekim9961
      @eugenekim9961 Год назад

      Academic scientists usually don't make that much money unless you bring in grants, so you do need a "side hustle." Mine was investing 😁.@@quillaja

  • @andredelacerdasantos4439
    @andredelacerdasantos4439 Год назад

    Sabine, your english has improved considerably recently. Have you been taking classes? It's an absolute joy to hear you talk.

  • @Danielle_1234
    @Danielle_1234 Год назад +10

    It's maybe a silly idea but I wonder if the quantum radar could apply to radio waves. It would be great to get a stronger FM signal while driving. I believe this can work because I too drive in a dilution refrigerator.

    • @GoonyMclinux
      @GoonyMclinux Год назад +1

      A superconductive antenna itself would have zero loss.

    • @Hexanitrobenzene
      @Hexanitrobenzene Год назад

      The process requires comparing photons, so it doesn't work for the FM radio, where only one direction communication is happening.
      However, you can forget FM. New cars will have internet radio in them...

  • @BarrettBoyer-l7y
    @BarrettBoyer-l7y Год назад +2

    Sabine does interesting science and some pretty good humor.. You and Anton make the best science news videos.

  • @MCsCreations
    @MCsCreations Год назад +3

    Thanks for all the news, Sabine! 😊
    Stay safe there with your family! 🖖😊

  • @rileydavidjesus
    @rileydavidjesus Год назад

    You are quick Sabine I just read about this today!

  • @erikfinnegan
    @erikfinnegan Год назад +7

    I love everything about this format. Only the sponsor gave me pause: I would have expected Sabine to explain the business model critically of an outlet which can sponsor the show (for money, I suppose) yet does not charge for its product.
    Oh, wait.... the newsletter which Sabine advertised is NOT their product ? WE are ?!

    • @KuK137
      @KuK137 Год назад +1

      Yup, it's yet another data harvester that at the same time seeks to indoctrinate you with biased content, whoever pays them the most will be given 'reliable source' mark...

    • @cbrew8775
      @cbrew8775 Год назад +2

      seriously.. u think Sabrine, just goes into the bathroom, does a video.. maybe production team?

  • @rob876
    @rob876 Год назад

    3:00 There's something happening at 104ºC but it isn't super conductivity. The material becomes a very poor conductor at that temperature where it was a better conductor below that temperature.

  • @Manf-ft6zk
    @Manf-ft6zk Год назад +7

    I thought the issue of superconductivity at room temperature was solved 30 years ago when a group of Siberian scientists solved it by working on room temperature.

    • @jwlsiee
      @jwlsiee Год назад +1

      room temperature ROOM PRESSURE is the important part

    • @cobra6481
      @cobra6481 Год назад +1

      @@jwlsiee SIBERIAN room temperature!! 😄 iz eezy komrade. 😂🤣

  • @MyNijo
    @MyNijo Год назад +1

    I was already waiting for Wednesday, and now is as if it were Christmas today :D Thx

  • @arctic_haze
    @arctic_haze Год назад +28

    I am waiting for someone to invent a quantum toaster which will produce entangled sliced bread toasts

    • @deaponn3069
      @deaponn3069 Год назад +5

      how do you include an image in your comment?

    • @dlstoddlstoddlstod
      @dlstoddlstoddlstod Год назад

      Maybe..

    • @arctic_haze
      @arctic_haze Год назад +2

      @@deaponn3069 Being a channel member and choosing from images provided by the channel owner

    • @thulyblu5486
      @thulyblu5486 Год назад

      Mine produces toasts where the jelly side reliably entangles with the floor

    • @Artaxo
      @Artaxo Год назад +2

      That would be awful. If you drop one toast butter up, the other is guaranteed to fall butter down

  • @kiqueyo5631
    @kiqueyo5631 Год назад +1

    It might be a room temperature multiferroic material. It wouldn´t be strange for such a complex lead containing oxide... or may be a minor unidentified phase too. I`ve observed that when the sample was displaced towards the magnet border it tilted and got attracted to the magnet. This seems to be an effect typical of a permanent ferromagnetic moment in the sample, instead of a real Meissner effect (always diamagnetic, thus repulsive to the applied magnetic field).

  • @TheMemesofDestruction
    @TheMemesofDestruction Год назад +2

    Love for LK-99 to live up to the hype! Still skeptical but those electron channels remind me of some of the work done by Brown and MIT involving twisted multilayer graphene. ^.^

  • @donniewatson9120
    @donniewatson9120 Год назад +1

    "Lots of Kryptonite", That's hilarious!!!

  • @5V500mA
    @5V500mA Год назад +9

    I like that perfect combination of news, science and jokes 😂

    • @max_7344
      @max_7344 Год назад +1

      And telephone 😂

  • @damonvanopdorp2905
    @damonvanopdorp2905 Год назад +1

    Thanks Sabine for the superconductor update and perspectives, much appreciated :)

  • @thepicatrix3150
    @thepicatrix3150 Год назад +40

    I love Sabine's joking snarky way of presenting science

  • @TheOtherSteel
    @TheOtherSteel Год назад

    I know you mean "the telephone" as humor, and while I usually got them in the opening weeks of these updates, for weeks now I've been stumped by all the references.

  • @coderhex1675
    @coderhex1675 Год назад +6

    I was expecting Sabinas's considerations after Anton Petrov and here it is

  • @quphys5253
    @quphys5253 Год назад

    Sabine - ThanX!!! The LK99 thing reminds me of the "Pons-Fleischman Cold Fusion" - a hype from the mid-to-late eighties …

  • @Kiever_Sloane
    @Kiever_Sloane Год назад +4

    I cracked up so hard at the suggestion to make sure dark matter is not a giant eel.

    • @MIck-M
      @MIck-M Год назад +2

      As a Bigfoot who identifies as a misunderstood hairy lumberjack, I absolutely empathize with your mirthful analysis.

  • @YoadJSVlog
    @YoadJSVlog Год назад +1

    This is the first time I was excited for the next update by Sabine.

  • @IroAppe
    @IroAppe Год назад +8

    The difference here is, that the physics are believable, I hope that this works eventually. Maybe not perfectly with this configuration, but perhaps with other atoms mixed into a molecular structure. I'd like the physics world to test this out. Not just that very configuration of LK99, but the effect in general, to understand it better.

  • @philochristos
    @philochristos Год назад +1

    That's a lot of news. I liked the Jedi/gedi - force/forest joke. That was pretty clever.

  • @lorpen4535
    @lorpen4535 Год назад +12

    I want LK99 to be true so bad... Want a big floaty rock in my room as deco...

    • @doremon2006
      @doremon2006 Год назад +1

      There is lead.

    • @lorpen4535
      @lorpen4535 Год назад

      Don't plan on licking it :D@@doremon2006

    • @Rembd
      @Rembd Год назад +1

      @@doremon2006 There's lead everywhere, every component in your computer was connected with 40% lead and 60% tin.

    • @solconcordia4315
      @solconcordia4315 Год назад

      ​​@@Rembd
      Maybe lead is a reason why the U. S. A. society is so violent because we've been spewing lead-laced automobile exhaust into our environment for decades at least. Tetraethyl lead was an anti-engine-knock additive to gasoline and diesel. It's corporate greed; it's known long ago that the ancient Romans were somewhat crazy because they drank wines sweetened by being stored in lead vessels. They used lead in their plumbing.
      Well, we, the Americans did the same thing with lead plumbing millennia after the ancient Romans. Lead is *cheap* and easily melted and molded.
      Mass shooting occurs in the U. S. A. on a near daily basis. It's good though that this country is huge so it's just a daily violence vitamin pill to cull.

    • @solconcordia4315
      @solconcordia4315 Год назад

      ​​@@Rembd
      Lead makes a number of eutectic alloy solid solutions which melt at lower temperatures than many other metals but its being neurotoxic is well known.
      Just because it's already widely used doesn't mean that it's safe. I was born in the early years of Anthropocene so I'm undoubtedly radioactive ☢️. I can be radioactive-dated via the radioactive strontium, cesium, iodine, potassium, tritium, etc. Nuclear radioactivity was dispersed so widely that it has already merged into the so-called "background" radioactivity. It's normal that people get elevated rates of cancer and have deformed children, right ?

  • @ChaoticNeutralMatt
    @ChaoticNeutralMatt Год назад +2

    I actually mostly understood your two sentences. Cool

  • @sociolocomtsac
    @sociolocomtsac Год назад +3

    They are transparent about the manufacturing process. To peer review, all you have to do is make it yourself.