Reason Genealogy and the Hermeneutics of Magnanimity with Robert Brandom

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 12 июн 2013
  • (Visit: www.uctv.tv/) Robert Brandom, Distinguished Professor of Philosophy, University of Pittsburgh, argues that genealogies (Marx, Nietzsche, Freud, Foucault) present the revenge of naturalism on rationalism. Hegel teaches us how to replace the genealogical hermeneutics of suspicion with a hermeneutics of magnanimity that allows us to see naturalism and rationalism as complementing rather than competing with one another. Series: "UC Berkeley Graduate Council Lectures" [6/2013] [Humanities] [Show ID: 25074]

Комментарии • 18

  • @wrstrn
    @wrstrn 7 лет назад +28

    brandom spits hot fire as usual

  • @Br0k3nS41nt
    @Br0k3nS41nt 5 лет назад +11

    Brandom's ideas about rational magnanimity as an antidote to globalized genealogical naturalism here are very important to many currents that flow through our current age, both from left and right.
    I just wish he was more accessible to the general audience. We could learn from his reading of Hegel a great deal.

  • @Aaron-hq4bu
    @Aaron-hq4bu 3 года назад +2

    Brandom is on fire here. Great lecture.

  • @AliceLittleful
    @AliceLittleful 10 лет назад +6

    With you there Brad......

  • @willalston9627
    @willalston9627 4 года назад +1

    I suppose it is worth getting to know Hegel's work.

  • @melissanance1645
    @melissanance1645 6 лет назад +4

    Great video and series. But that intro song.........😬

  • @ackbooh9032
    @ackbooh9032 2 года назад +2

    "Naturalism" in what sense? I feel like I missed the definition. Not sure how Foucault or Nietzsche are being naturalistic in their hermeneutic theses and models of thought

    • @BENICEBLACK
      @BENICEBLACK 2 года назад +2

      It's naturalism as the disenchantment of the world. Nietzsche and Focault use genealogy to unmask the attitude dependence of conceptual content, i.e. pointing out the humans (and social context) behind 'truth.'

  • @maxspellbane9595
    @maxspellbane9595 27 дней назад

    20:58

  • @galek75
    @galek75 4 года назад +1

    9:35

  • @brandgardner211
    @brandgardner211 5 лет назад

    speak UP

  • @ippolit23
    @ippolit23 5 лет назад

    I wonder if Wittgenstein would have torn those concepts to shreds.

  • @MrKmanthie
    @MrKmanthie 10 лет назад +1

    This is stretching the boundaries of logical thinking a bit - just because HEGEL wrote it doesn't really mean a whole hell of a lot!

    • @isabellamorais15
      @isabellamorais15 6 лет назад +8

      Nobody said it did. Such a poor interpreter...

    • @galek75
      @galek75 4 года назад +3

      @@isabellamorais15 OP is the embodiment of the irrational skepticism Brandom seeks to defeat.

  • @hb8213
    @hb8213 3 года назад

    30:34