Please do like, subscribe and share! And leave any questions or comments. Or just drop me an emoji to help the algorithm! Thanks for taking the time to watch the video!
I like that you are trying to find more accurate theories from different approaches and going against generally not accepted stuff. But also I don't see why it is better to see photons as disturbances of aether rather than the electromagnetic field. You have to explain a lot of phenomena that the existing two main theories can with equations, if you want people to believe the things you are saying are true. You will have to do experiments too to validate the theories.
@nexyboye5111 There are around 50 different proofs of the Aether, I may go into some soon... But if you check out Ken Wheeler's channel he goes into more depth and explanations of this. Again this is Tesla's science, and we know he was a "genius" so there must be something in this! Also I am trying to "prove" this with deductive reasoning and logic, rather than experiment. At least I hope to stimulate some thought and for people to take Aether seriously again! Here is one of Ken's videos, but do have a look through his channel: ruclips.net/video/UjrmfsZckvM/видео.html
@infiniteinfiniteinfi Yes! and Tesla's science will allow "free energy" machines. If we can get these going it will change the world for all the people!
The double-slit experiment is actually extremely simple. Forget about waves and particles. Light is NOT a wave, and the fringe pattern is not a "wave interference" pattern. It's a simple reflection pattern. No corner is a perfect 90° angle. Therefore, because light is reflecting off a "curved" surface, the angle of reflection varies with the angle of the surface, producing multiple rays never interfering with each other, which appear to fan out. I have done the experiment inside a cloud chamber, or with the use of smoke to confirm this interpretation. I followed Ken Wheeler for a couple of years before I understood how he was wrong on many things. Light is not a disturbance in the Aether. Light IS Aether. Quantum mechanics is nothing more than a probabilistic mathematical framework based on the misunderstanding and the misinterpretation of the nature of light, and especially the double-slit experiment. Maybe that's why it's "probabilistic"... The MATH may be useful for replicating technology and chemical reactions, but it has no bearing on reality itself, because the theory is founded on the fallacy of quantum state superposition, which is irrational.
@SciD1 Ok, really great information! Thank you! Indeed there are no straight lines anyway. And I still have a different way of looking at it than Ken, but I do like his approach to metaphysics and the golden ratio. Yes, QM is all "probability fields" and "virtual particles". I am trying to describe a universe that includes consiousness (spirit) as Aether. Aether is "inertia" as Ken says, non-physical (wu chi - in taoism) then this splits into dielectricity and magnetism (yin and yang). Please do stay in touch, it would be great to chat properly one day (my website is entify.world) You might be interested to hear these talks (??): "what is the force?" ruclips.net/video/o2v6lOwE6_w/видео.html "what is chi?" ruclips.net/video/g3nWJqny9kw/видео.html
yeah probably that's why real physicists were able to find particles humanity have never seen before, because quantum mechanics is wrong and has no connection to reality.
@nexyboye5111 Yes! They just assume it must be a particle because of a materialistic viewpoint! Now they are talking about virtual particles! This is total fantasy! Why do people believe this fairy tale, but not believe the Aether?? This is dogma and cultism. We assume the established science must be right - why should it be? - especially as it is dependent on money and banking!
@@bodyefficiencytraining virtual particles, like all other particles, are mathematical concepts. Physics can't explain the "why" of anything. Every time it tries, it only reifies mathematical equations. That's what quantum mechanics and Relativity are, reified math.
@SciD1 well said! Yes QM is a self-indulgent exploration of mathematics for its own sake. Tesla said that these guys can think very deeply, but not clearly!
@pgknippel Ive got this comment on my quantum mechanics talk! I expect it was for my elastic power exercises?? either way, thank you for the feedback, and Yes, very much dancing exercises also!
In fairness, an "elastic power" joke should have used Susskind instead of Boltzmann,@@bodyefficiencytraining. I also have a joke about Heisenberg and Schrödinger, if you're interested... PS - Thank you for the video.
I fail to understand the standing wave part, but I will watch the other videos. I just bumped into your channel right now. Subscribed. Your view fits with mine.
@ytmish Yes, this is all a bit difficult to understand, because we are used to a materialistic science. If you do watch my lecture series from the beginning I hope it will make more sense! But it is even more difficult to explain!! I will keep on trying to improve my explanations! Please do stay tuned! Here is the first lecture in the series: ruclips.net/video/5t7-eM5fMYw/видео.html
@professionalgambler74 Thanks again! Yes, I find this stuff fascinating. I really think the universe should be simple to understand, but we are not looking at it correctly. Quantum is impossibly difficult, and by their own admission no-one understands it! Using clever quantum jargon does not mean you understand anything!
A while ago i got interested in quantam mechanics particle physics nature of reality all that as a person who didnt go to univeristy and earned a livung through manuel labour it was a struggle to understand but was intriuged .Then i realised that none of it matters and mostly we dont kniw and when old poeple are freezung to death cant pay energy bill and homeless on the streets something something fkd up with humanity we strive to understand wave function and measurement problem and we probably never will while turning a blind to suffering if iur fellow man feel like going to bed and never getting up again?
@arielbender6173 Yes I can understand this. This all just seems pointless when you look at the state of the world! But I think this fundamental science that we are all taught is the foundation of the problems in the world. A purely materialistic science leads to purely materialistic people. if we can understand a universe that connects us all as spiritual and physical beings (that is Aether or Chi energy) then we change our perspective and this could stimulate a movement towards a better world. Indeed Tesla's science of Aether will allow "free energy" machines and if we could bring those out it would totally change the world - virtually overnight!
What is a parasol other than the practical use of shadow? Propagation of waves is not mysterious. It's what waves do, propagate. What is maintained is the pattern of the slits in the waveform. I think a particle is a constrained, coherent packet of energy. It will be very interesting to see how the maths develop.
@stephanygates6491 Thanks for your feedback! You seem to know a lot about this so I do suggest you have a look at Ken Wheelers videos. He will go into mathematics and much more serious depth to this. Here is a recent video of his. But do look through his channel. ruclips.net/video/QMczCx6qJ3g/видео.html
@tr0n1c Ha ha, yes! I am not so bothered about my appearance! I do these videos super early in the morning and it is very cold here in London! I just hope to bring some different ideas to the table!
Wait you said sometime you fire a photon and sometimes nothing will happen that is your theory... You can test this by doing the experiment 1 photon at a time and register if at any time no point appear so you should do the experiment. to confirm or modify your theory it is not out of reach or prohibitively costly.
@smashu2 yes, I am not sure exactly what would happen. but there is definetely an element of chance in where the dots appear, so why not sometimes none? No nodes of inteference align properly. I really think that Aether physics can explain all phenomena (even if I cannot do it personally!) Check out another comment below by @SciD1 there is another explanation again from someone that has done it! Very interesting explanation!
@cjd12319721 thank you! and Yes, most alternative, new age stuff tends to be lost in quantum jargon (which is still really just mainstream) - Not many seem to understand the concept of aether. Saying that it is difficult to understand! We are not used to the idea. I keep trying to improve my explanations, please do stay tuned!
Ken Wheeler is a basket case. I much prefer Huygens Optics. He did a 3 part series on coherence a year back. Part 3 is the best. It's called "This is not a Wave," but don't let the title fool you. It will seem quite witty after you watch it, and you should. I think you'll find it inspiring.
@Naomi_Boyd thanks! Sure, many people don't like him, but I'm only interested in the information he is passing on. It comes from Tesla himself, pythagoras etc... and I like his explanations of the golden ratio and ancient greek metaphysics. I just checked out Huygen optics, thank you! I will give it a proper look ... Thanks for your great and honest feedback! much appreciated!
I think he was talking to me. LOL Don't get me wrong, I like Ken Wheeler. He seems like a nice guy, and he's certainly not stupid. I believe that science needs all of the original thinkers it can get. The biggest problem I have with the guy is that he speaks in absolutes. Scientists say this is what we think, but Ken says this is how it is. That's not science. It's dogma. And let's be honest. Ken is a bit of a nut, and anybody who can't admit that is probably one too.
@@bodyefficiencytraining Not you mate I was replying to the commenter Boyd above.I enjoyed your video and your theory on the double split, for what it's worth I think your on the right path. In my opinion modern academic minds get lost in the complexity that results from the false models that were pushed by the establishment, all designed to obfuscate the truth of our reality which was known to our ancesters. There's nothing new under the sun!
Please do like, subscribe and share! And leave any questions or comments. Or just drop me an emoji to help the algorithm! Thanks for taking the time to watch the video!
I like that you are trying to find more accurate theories from different approaches and going against generally not accepted stuff. But also I don't see why it is better to see photons as disturbances of aether rather than the electromagnetic field. You have to explain a lot of phenomena that the existing two main theories can with equations, if you want people to believe the things you are saying are true. You will have to do experiments too to validate the theories.
@nexyboye5111 There are around 50 different proofs of the Aether, I may go into some soon... But if you check out Ken Wheeler's channel he goes into more depth and explanations of this. Again this is Tesla's science, and we know he was a "genius" so there must be something in this! Also I am trying to "prove" this with deductive reasoning and logic, rather than experiment. At least I hope to stimulate some thought and for people to take Aether seriously again! Here is one of Ken's videos, but do have a look through his channel: ruclips.net/video/UjrmfsZckvM/видео.html
Science of, by and for the people.
@infiniteinfiniteinfi Yes! and Tesla's science will allow "free energy" machines. If we can get these going it will change the world for all the people!
The double-slit experiment is actually extremely simple. Forget about waves and particles. Light is NOT a wave, and the fringe pattern is not a "wave interference" pattern. It's a simple reflection pattern. No corner is a perfect 90° angle. Therefore, because light is reflecting off a "curved" surface, the angle of reflection varies with the angle of the surface, producing multiple rays never interfering with each other, which appear to fan out. I have done the experiment inside a cloud chamber, or with the use of smoke to confirm this interpretation. I followed Ken Wheeler for a couple of years before I understood how he was wrong on many things. Light is not a disturbance in the Aether. Light IS Aether.
Quantum mechanics is nothing more than a probabilistic mathematical framework based on the misunderstanding and the misinterpretation of the nature of light, and especially the double-slit experiment. Maybe that's why it's "probabilistic"... The MATH may be useful for replicating technology and chemical reactions, but it has no bearing on reality itself, because the theory is founded on the fallacy of quantum state superposition, which is irrational.
@SciD1 Ok, really great information! Thank you! Indeed there are no straight lines anyway. And I still have a different way of looking at it than Ken, but I do like his approach to metaphysics and the golden ratio. Yes, QM is all "probability fields" and "virtual particles". I am trying to describe a universe that includes consiousness (spirit) as Aether. Aether is "inertia" as Ken says, non-physical (wu chi - in taoism) then this splits into dielectricity and magnetism (yin and yang).
Please do stay in touch, it would be great to chat properly one day (my website is entify.world)
You might be interested to hear these talks (??):
"what is the force?"
ruclips.net/video/o2v6lOwE6_w/видео.html
"what is chi?"
ruclips.net/video/g3nWJqny9kw/видео.html
yeah probably that's why real physicists were able to find particles humanity have never seen before, because quantum mechanics is wrong and has no connection to reality.
@nexyboye5111 Yes! They just assume it must be a particle because of a materialistic viewpoint! Now they are talking about virtual particles! This is total fantasy! Why do people believe this fairy tale, but not believe the Aether?? This is dogma and cultism. We assume the established science must be right - why should it be? - especially as it is dependent on money and banking!
@@bodyefficiencytraining virtual particles, like all other particles, are mathematical concepts. Physics can't explain the "why" of anything. Every time it tries, it only reifies mathematical equations. That's what quantum mechanics and Relativity are, reified math.
@SciD1 well said! Yes QM is a self-indulgent exploration of mathematics for its own sake. Tesla said that these guys can think very deeply, but not clearly!
This video reminds me of the time I studied Jazzercise under Boltzmann
@pgknippel Ive got this comment on my quantum mechanics talk! I expect it was for my elastic power exercises?? either way, thank you for the feedback, and Yes, very much dancing exercises also!
In fairness, an "elastic power" joke should have used Susskind instead of Boltzmann,@@bodyefficiencytraining. I also have a joke about Heisenberg and Schrödinger, if you're interested...
PS - Thank you for the video.
@pgknippel I would love to hear that joke about heisenberg and shrodinger!! Please tell me!!
I fail to understand the standing wave part, but I will watch the other videos. I just bumped into your channel right now. Subscribed. Your view fits with mine.
@ytmish Yes, this is all a bit difficult to understand, because we are used to a materialistic science. If you do watch my lecture series from the beginning I hope it will make more sense! But it is even more difficult to explain!! I will keep on trying to improve my explanations! Please do stay tuned! Here is the first lecture in the series: ruclips.net/video/5t7-eM5fMYw/видео.html
great video, very interesting
@professionalgambler74 Thanks again! Yes, I find this stuff fascinating. I really think the universe should be simple to understand, but we are not looking at it correctly. Quantum is impossibly difficult, and by their own admission no-one understands it! Using clever quantum jargon does not mean you understand anything!
A while ago i got interested in quantam mechanics particle physics nature of reality all that as a person who didnt go to univeristy and earned a livung through manuel labour it was a struggle to understand but was intriuged .Then i realised that none of it matters and mostly we dont kniw and when old poeple are freezung to death cant pay energy bill and homeless on the streets something something fkd up with humanity we strive to understand wave function and measurement problem and we probably never will while turning a blind to suffering if iur fellow man feel like going to bed and never getting up again?
@arielbender6173 Yes I can understand this. This all just seems pointless when you look at the state of the world! But I think this fundamental science that we are all taught is the foundation of the problems in the world. A purely materialistic science leads to purely materialistic people. if we can understand a universe that connects us all as spiritual and physical beings (that is Aether or Chi energy) then we change our perspective and this could stimulate a movement towards a better world. Indeed Tesla's science of Aether will allow "free energy" machines and if we could bring those out it would totally change the world - virtually overnight!
I have felt the same way before (and may again) but curiosity is a very useful trait and I hope you regain it.
What is a parasol other than the practical use of shadow? Propagation of waves is not mysterious. It's what waves do, propagate. What is maintained is the pattern of the slits in the waveform. I think a particle is a constrained, coherent packet of energy. It will be very interesting to see how the maths develop.
@stephanygates6491 Thanks for your feedback! You seem to know a lot about this so I do suggest you have a look at Ken Wheelers videos. He will go into mathematics and much more serious depth to this. Here is a recent video of his. But do look through his channel.
ruclips.net/video/QMczCx6qJ3g/видео.html
Only a super Genius would wear 3x hoodies!
@tr0n1c Ha ha, yes! I am not so bothered about my appearance! I do these videos super early in the morning and it is very cold here in London! I just hope to bring some different ideas to the table!
Wait you said sometime you fire a photon and sometimes nothing will happen that is your theory... You can test this by doing the experiment 1 photon at a time and register if at any time no point appear so you should do the experiment. to confirm or modify your theory it is not out of reach or prohibitively costly.
@smashu2 yes, I am not sure exactly what would happen. but there is definetely an element of chance in where the dots appear, so why not sometimes none? No nodes of inteference align properly. I really think that Aether physics can explain all phenomena (even if I cannot do it personally!)
Check out another comment below by @SciD1 there is another explanation again from someone that has done it! Very interesting explanation!
Very interesting: so much Ticktoc nonsense regarding the double split. Poor interpretations of science leads to awful metaphysics.
@cjd12319721 thank you! and Yes, most alternative, new age stuff tends to be lost in quantum jargon (which is still really just mainstream) - Not many seem to understand the concept of aether. Saying that it is difficult to understand! We are not used to the idea. I keep trying to improve my explanations, please do stay tuned!
Ken Wheeler is a basket case. I much prefer Huygens Optics. He did a 3 part series on coherence a year back. Part 3 is the best. It's called "This is not a Wave," but don't let the title fool you. It will seem quite witty after you watch it, and you should. I think you'll find it inspiring.
@Naomi_Boyd thanks! Sure, many people don't like him, but I'm only interested in the information he is passing on. It comes from Tesla himself, pythagoras etc... and I like his explanations of the golden ratio and ancient greek metaphysics. I just checked out Huygen optics, thank you! I will give it a proper look ... Thanks for your great and honest feedback! much appreciated!
Your arrogance stinks!
@pasteboard5269 Sorry about that! I don't mean to come across like that! I will try to do better in future...
I think he was talking to me. LOL
Don't get me wrong, I like Ken Wheeler. He seems like a nice guy, and he's certainly not stupid. I believe that science needs all of the original thinkers it can get. The biggest problem I have with the guy is that he speaks in absolutes. Scientists say this is what we think, but Ken says this is how it is. That's not science. It's dogma.
And let's be honest. Ken is a bit of a nut, and anybody who can't admit that is probably one too.
@@bodyefficiencytraining Not you mate I was replying to the commenter Boyd above.I enjoyed your video and your theory on the double split, for what it's worth I think your on the right path. In my opinion modern academic minds get lost in the complexity that results from the false models that were pushed by the establishment, all designed to obfuscate the truth of our reality which was known to our ancesters. There's nothing new under the sun!