I have always been so intrigued by Anne Boleyn must be why I watch almost all the videos about her regardless. I love Claire Ridgeway and have all her books on the tudors fascinating.
She clearly did have an emotional tie with her mother, keeping the ring close to her. She didn't need to move the body, or visit, she kept Anne in her heart ♥️
@@kelrogers8480It does make sense. Why couldn’t Elizabeth have visited The Chapel Royal of St Peter ad Vincula as an adult, during the reign of Mary I… It wasn’t a secret her mother and other executed individuals were buried there.
Elizabeth showed much favor to all her mothers side of relatives. Mary Boelyn’s sons, and daughter. She loved her mother’s side of the family very much which proved exactly how she felt about her mother. She may have never spoken loud about her to many people, but her actions showed just how she felt. She even wore the famous “B” necklace.
Annes rich clothing was returned to the king, The executioner was paid a purse of 27 pounds. Normally the condemned had their clothing and other good given to the officers of the tower, but because of the clothing laws they were not allowed to have or wear the rich fabrics or royalty or the aristocracy. All the rich clothes went to the king. They would be cleaned and remade and given to some worthy person at court, or they would be kept and stored away.
That's what they did with convicted criminals infact I doubt she had her head they may have tared it and placed it on a spike till it rotted then tossed in to the tames river. Hystory isn't always kind
She was too young to ever have a personal connection with Anne when she was executed so I think she honored her as a mom in general but when her name came up in issues and discussions, she would be uncomfortable in saying/contributing anything and would stay quiet because of her lack of an emotional connection. I bet she would have felt the irony when she imprisoned Mary queen of scots and prevented her from ever associating with King James in exchange for the throne.
I bet she didn’t. She was no fool and wouldn’t associate herself if possible with her “traitorous “ mother. There was also the stink of bastardy about her because of her mother. Elizabeth knew when to cut her losses
For the bones sake, she could be buried next to her mother, but she’s already with her mother now and making up for all the time they lost. What’s in the grave is just the bones.
Losing a parent at any age is traumatic and devastating for any child but Elizabeth may have been “lucky” in a way to have been spared this trauma. She was only 3 years old when her mother was executed and being a royal Princess it’s likely she didn’t see her mother often enough to really form any memories or attachment to her.
I have read that as queen, Elizabeth's advisers cautioned her about bringing up / reminding others, of her mother's demise, because it could be politically unwise. There was in fact a coffin but Anne's headless body was shuved in it disrespectfully, skull of course separated. I do not know whether or not Elizabeth I ever visited the grave itself or even were she able, to locate it's exact placement.
@@DavidJohnRedwooda strange comment...that you don’t know if she visited !!?? ....why and how would you know ...no more than any of us....like us your information is based on what others have written over centuries which can not be properly confirmed ....so why would you dispute the story of the arrow box as there is no proof either way .....pretty high handed attitude
@@DavidJohnRedwood what a strange passive aggressive comment. The "fact" you state so confidently is wrong. She was placed in a chest after her execution. I do admire your confidence however, even if it is misplaced.
They were so steeped in tradition & protocol that visiting her mothers grave could of been seen as a challenge to the history of the crown ? When you are Queen , you shouldn't need to worry about something so trivial as visiting your mothers resting place , that is pathetic , period , full stop ... Great information PPpodcast , I truly enjoyed it . I look forward to more content like this ... The narration is stellar , I usually can't follow a British accent well , but I could yours . Very clear & concise ..
There's also information out there that says that Anne Boleyn was actually moved to Blickling Hall, as that is the Boleyn family's burial place. I don't think there is a 100% agreement on if those remains are actually Ann's in St Peter Ad Vincula
Im surprised Elizabeth never had memorials crafted for her siblings. She loved her little brother and thought Mary may had made her life a nightmare, she at least might have understood her wishes
Emotional bonds can be complicated and rife with what seems lile contradictions. I'm sure she loved them, but her brother disinherited her and Mary. That decision ultimately cost Jane Grey, their cousin, her life. Mary had Elizabeth locked up in the tower and released her on the anniversary of her mother's execution. Her siblings got the memorials due to them as monarchs, not as good siblongs lol.
@michellecrocker2485 I think you're right. She comes from a complicated family but surely must have loved them. Perhaps she didn't bring up the issue of commemorating them publicly because it could have forced her to address traumas she'd rather keep private. She was a precocious woman who did not speak on how she felt about her personal matters.
I can't believe that no instructions were given as to Anne's burial and that no coffin was provided, NOT even a simple wooden one. That's the ultimate betrayal and snub, I've always thought Henry VIII was a crappy guy and husband but at least the king should have provided a coffin for his now executed queen and more importantly the Mother of his Daughter.
I don’t understand how they could just place bodies underneath the floor like that, did they prepare bodies back then? I would think the place might smell from decaying remains
With modern DNA testing, it would be potentially easy to identify the remains. As for whether it should be done, probably not. Royal graves are scattered around the country. One chapel is no greater or lesser than the next. And in this modern era, there seems little desire to elevate royal graves into tourism destinations. That said, imagine a new chapel at Windsor Castle with the graves of every monarch and their families in one location.
I hope she did visit. What a horrible thing for a young girl to lose her mama, treated so badly
I hope she did visit, but it's not surprising if she didn't, she barely remembered her
Poor Anne and Elizabeth both lost each other so young
I have always been so intrigued by Anne Boleyn must be why I watch almost all the videos about her regardless. I love Claire Ridgeway and have all her books on the tudors fascinating.
She clearly did have an emotional tie with her mother, keeping the ring close to her. She didn't need to move the body, or visit, she kept Anne in her heart ♥️
She, Anne, had no mercy on Catherine of Aragon
@@MarieCassidy-zd8sc And what has that got to do with her feelings for her mother. None.
The ring has a concealed picture of her mother in it, so everything to do with her feelings for her mother.
@@MarieCassidy-zd8sc that a lode of bs henry was the one who wanted cathrine gone ann had no choice the king ask for something he gets it
She was held in the tower for several months so there is a chance she visited her mother there. Anne was at peace. Mary didn’t move her mother either
This statement makes the logical sense ❤
Her mother was executed when she was 3 yrs old. Wtf are you talking about?!
@@kelrogers8480It does make sense. Why couldn’t Elizabeth have visited The Chapel Royal of St Peter ad Vincula as an adult, during the reign of Mary I… It wasn’t a secret her mother and other executed individuals were buried there.
@@kelrogers8480Elizabeth was imprisoned in the tower by Mary 1
@khusbur1403 I'm well aware of that, thank you.
Elizabeth showed much favor to all her mothers side of relatives. Mary Boelyn’s sons, and daughter. She loved her mother’s side of the family very much which proved exactly how she felt about her mother. She may have never spoken loud about her to many people, but her actions showed just how she felt. She even wore the famous “B” necklace.
Annes rich clothing was returned to the king, The executioner was paid a purse of 27 pounds. Normally the condemned had their clothing and other good given to the officers of the tower, but because of the clothing laws they were not allowed to have or wear the rich fabrics or royalty or the aristocracy. All the rich clothes went to the king. They would be cleaned and remade and given to some worthy person at court, or they would be kept and stored away.
£27 was a lot of money in those days.
Anne Boleyn buried with no funeral rites? No wonder she is rumoured to haunt ...
ruclips.net/video/H4WKxq5OSkI/видео.html
No, those are demons. Anne is with God!
That's what they did with convicted criminals infact I doubt she had her head they may have tared it and placed it on a spike till it rotted then tossed in to the tames river. Hystory isn't always kind
So sad😔🌹
She was too young to ever have a personal connection with Anne when she was executed so I think she honored her as a mom in general but when her name came up in issues and discussions, she would be uncomfortable in saying/contributing anything and would stay quiet because of her lack of an emotional connection. I bet she would have felt the irony when she imprisoned Mary queen of scots and prevented her from ever associating with King James in exchange for the throne.
The Scottish lords would've kept Mary from her son, not Queen Elizabeth.
I already know the answer to the question is no but I want to watch anyway.
Same
I bet she didn’t. She was no fool and wouldn’t associate herself if possible with her “traitorous “ mother. There was also the stink of bastardy about her because of her mother. Elizabeth knew when to cut her losses
Queen Mary should be re-buried next to her Mother Queen Catherine of Aragon
For the bones sake, she could be buried next to her mother, but she’s already with her mother now and making up for all the time they lost. What’s in the grave is just the bones.
Losing a parent at any age is traumatic and devastating for any child but Elizabeth may have been “lucky” in a way to have been spared this trauma. She was only 3 years old when her mother was executed and being a royal Princess it’s likely she didn’t see her mother often enough to really form any memories or attachment to her.
Elizabeth probably prayed in the chapel where her mother is buried, when Mary had her imprisoned in the Tower.
I wonder if she knew? At that time sounds like a cold thing to tell someone before locking them up. But she probably already knew.
I have read that as queen, Elizabeth's advisers cautioned her about bringing up / reminding others, of her mother's demise, because it could be politically unwise.
There was in fact a coffin but Anne's headless body was shuved in it disrespectfully, skull of course separated. I do not know whether or not Elizabeth I ever visited the grave itself or even were she able, to locate it's exact placement.
Sorry to disagree, but there was not a coffin for Anne Boleyn when she was executed, that’s why she had to be buried in an arrow chest.
@@annewren8845 Thank you for sharing that belief you have.
@@DavidJohnRedwooda strange comment...that you don’t know if she visited !!?? ....why and how would you know ...no more than any of us....like us your information is based on what others have written over centuries which can not be properly confirmed ....so why would you dispute the story of the arrow box as there is no proof either way .....pretty high handed attitude
@@DavidJohnRedwood what a strange passive aggressive comment.
The "fact" you state so confidently is wrong. She was placed in a chest after her execution. I do admire your confidence however, even if it is misplaced.
They were so steeped in tradition & protocol that visiting her mothers grave could of been seen as a challenge to the history of the crown ? When you are Queen , you shouldn't need to worry about something so trivial as visiting your mothers resting place , that is pathetic , period , full stop ... Great information PPpodcast , I truly enjoyed it . I look forward to more content like this ... The narration is stellar , I usually can't follow a British accent well , but I could yours . Very clear & concise ..
Thats coz you dont speak the Kings' English
@@sugarnads - Good point Bro
She didn’t actually go to Anne’s grave, but I understand she visited the Boleyn family church? Chapel? 🤔 at least once.
There's also information out there that says that Anne Boleyn was actually moved to Blickling Hall, as that is the Boleyn family's burial place. I don't think there is a 100% agreement on if those remains are actually Ann's in St Peter Ad Vincula
Isn't that in salle in Norfolk?
Im surprised Elizabeth never had memorials crafted for her siblings. She loved her little brother and thought Mary may had made her life a nightmare, she at least might have understood her wishes
Emotional bonds can be complicated and rife with what seems lile contradictions. I'm sure she loved them, but her brother disinherited her and Mary. That decision ultimately cost Jane Grey, their cousin, her life. Mary had Elizabeth locked up in the tower and released her on the anniversary of her mother's execution. Her siblings got the memorials due to them as monarchs, not as good siblongs lol.
@@MEAJJEKL I wanna think that Elizabeth’s stance on them was “ they weren’t the best siblings but they were the ones God gave me”
@michellecrocker2485 I think you're right. She comes from a complicated family but surely must have loved them. Perhaps she didn't bring up the issue of commemorating them publicly because it could have forced her to address traumas she'd rather keep private. She was a precocious woman who did not speak on how she felt about her personal matters.
I can't believe that no instructions were given as to Anne's burial and that no coffin was provided, NOT even a simple wooden one. That's the ultimate betrayal and snub, I've always thought Henry VIII was a crappy guy and husband but at least the king should have provided a coffin for his now executed queen and more importantly the Mother of his Daughter.
No, her mother didn’t have a grave. This caption is so misleading I’m not even watching this video. For shame.
What would you call it then? 🙃
@@PastPeople misleading speculation?
@mandyviv57 sounds good to me 😂
Looks like Elizabeth was like me with dead... uninterested. I told my daughter that I didn't want a funeral and to donate my body to science.
I don’t understand how they could just place bodies underneath the floor like that, did they prepare bodies back then? I would think the place might smell from decaying remains
💔💔💔💔💔💔💔💔💔💔💔💔💔
How the English people didn’t revolt against her father Henry the 8th is beyond me,he was a monster
also thought that a thousand times ..... I think he also knew he was incapable of having a son ..as he took young girls to wed ..
The people did rebel, it was called the Pilgrimage of Grace , they were put down without mercy
They were just as invested in an legitimate heir to the throne as the King was.
No King Henry 8th Tudor had Welsh Elizabeth Boleyn and her relative Anne Boleyn Exicuted.
With modern DNA testing, it would be potentially easy to identify the remains.
As for whether it should be done, probably not. Royal graves are scattered around the country. One chapel is no greater or lesser than the next. And in this modern era, there seems little desire to elevate royal graves into tourism destinations.
That said, imagine a new chapel at Windsor Castle with the graves of every monarch and their families in one location.
I think you mean 'lack of interest'. not disinterest.
There is paper work to show where everyone is buried
This is why funeral pyres should have been used back then. And today. Cemeteries are a waste of arable land.
Doubt it
Henry was such a monster. I truly hope he is turning in hell.
sadly no one loved her
Her sister, brother and mother did. Annes father and uncle are just as to blame has henry for this poor women's death
Advincula
King charles needs to have her buried next to her daughter
And have Katherine of aragon buried next to her daughter
This has nothing to do with the King. He has no power to arrange this.
Why should he give a shit about some wife of a tudor rulers burial place?
@sugarnads whats with the attitude ahole
@@sugarnads What a well worded contribution to a debate. Are you American?