Lec 26: Spherical coordinates; surface area | MIT 18.02 Multivariable Calculus, Fall 2007

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 12 сен 2024
  • Lecture 26: Spherical coordinates; surface area.
    View the complete course at: ocw.mit.edu/18-...
    License: Creative Commons BY-NC-SA
    More information at ocw.mit.edu/terms
    More courses at ocw.mit.edu

Комментарии • 70

  • @moeezart835
    @moeezart835 10 лет назад +50

    I never thought I would understand spherical coordinates! This guy makes it easssyyyy

  • @alexhudson502
    @alexhudson502 2 года назад +6

    Lecture 1: Dot Product
    Lecture 2: Determinants
    Lecture 3: Matrices
    Lecture 4: Square Systems
    Lecture 5: Parametric Equations
    Lecture 6: Kepler's Second Law
    Lecture 7: Exam Review (goes over practice exam 1a at 24 min 40 seconds)
    Lecture 8: Partial Derivatives
    Lecture 9: Max-Min and Least Squares
    Lecture 10: Second Derivative Test
    Lecture 11: Chain Rule
    Lecture 12: Gradient
    Lecture 13: Lagrange Multipliers
    Lecture 14: Non-Independent Variables
    Lecture 15: Partial Differential Equations
    Lecture 16: Double Integrals
    Lecture 17: Polar Coordinates
    Lecture 18: Change of Variables
    Lecture 19: Vector Fields
    Lecture 20: Path Independence
    Lecture 21: Gradient Fields
    Lecture 22: Green's Theorem
    Lecture 23: Flux
    Lecture 24: Simply Connected Regions
    Lecture 25: Triple Integrals
    Lecture 26: Spherical Coordinates
    Lecture 27: Vector Fields in 3D
    Lecture 28: Divergence Theorem
    Lecture 29: Divergence Theorem (cont.)
    Lecture 30: Line Integrals
    Lecture 31: Stokes' Theorem
    Lecture 32: Stokes' Theorem (cont.)
    Lecture 33: Maxwell's Equations
    Lecture 34: Final Review
    Lecture 35: Final Review (cont.)

  • @sandar15
    @sandar15 12 лет назад +27

    Mr. Denis made me able to pass my final Multivariable Calculus exam... He's the boss!!!

  • @kittycat1768
    @kittycat1768 7 лет назад +45

    "How many of you have seen spherical coordinates before?"
    *Half the class raise their hands*
    "I see that's not very many."
    - The legendary Auroux, 2007

    • @deeptochatterjee532
      @deeptochatterjee532 7 лет назад +2

      Shabit Hassan Actually, it was only at least 1/4 of them

  • @navs8603
    @navs8603 5 лет назад +8

    The ending of this lecture to reference Black hole was mind blowing !!!

  • @pabloastoreca8726
    @pabloastoreca8726 7 лет назад +17

    A lecture without Aurox's magical erasings 😔

  • @JAGAMTec
    @JAGAMTec 14 лет назад +12

    I wish he was my teacher, what a nice class. excelent

  • @hongyuzhang5631
    @hongyuzhang5631 4 года назад +3

    I have to say: his explanation is so god damn clear!

  • @Dra60oN
    @Dra60oN 6 лет назад +7

    At 32:04 there was actually a question, someone actually raised a hand up.

  • @xTheUndeadzx
    @xTheUndeadzx 11 лет назад +4

    His lecture is so clear!

  • @hamsinideshmukh
    @hamsinideshmukh Год назад +1

    refer to the spherical coorinate system taught in a best way eva till 13:57

  • @swaggerchegger98
    @swaggerchegger98 9 лет назад +1

    The Einstein field equations state that the superpostion principle will not work on gravitational fields. So using the formulas at ~41min wouldn't take relativity into consideration :)

  • @topilinkala1594
    @topilinkala1594 2 года назад

    Spherical cap of radius r and height h: pi*(h^2)*(3r-h)/3. Radius r is the radius of the sphere, not of the cap. Here r=1 and h=1-1/sqrt(2) which gives the answer. My HP-50g gives it as (8-5*sqrt(2))*pi/12 which is the same that was on the lecture. Personally I don't like roots in denominators in answers.

  • @dtalmood
    @dtalmood 6 лет назад +18

    Oh my god literally this guy is smart, my professor just throws information on the white board with no explanation

  • @denisespinoza2597
    @denisespinoza2597 5 месяцев назад

    Thank you Professor Denis Auroux

  • @jankipatel2392
    @jankipatel2392 5 лет назад +2

    Nice .....
    Very nice explaination sir....
    Brilliant

  • @belthazor000
    @belthazor000 14 лет назад +3

    i wish to have a lecture like that in my university..

  • @yunlongosterxia2768
    @yunlongosterxia2768 5 лет назад

    great professor. that is why mit is mit. --comment from a freshman from cuhksz

  • @priyanshubansal6776
    @priyanshubansal6776 3 года назад

    thanks to camera man and mit who put his time in making this lecture

  • @LambdaJuuichi
    @LambdaJuuichi 12 лет назад +2

    Damn this guy is amazing D: he explains really good.

  • @legacies9041
    @legacies9041 3 года назад +1

    @ 38:30 it is technically India and not China! India is right on the other side of Boston

  • @bobkameron
    @bobkameron 3 года назад +1

    great lecture!

  • @sachinruffneck
    @sachinruffneck 10 лет назад +1

    fantastic lecturer

  • @joebrinson5040
    @joebrinson5040 2 года назад

    Thank you MIT

  • @Originalimoc
    @Originalimoc 6 лет назад +2

    This lecture literally get me addicted 😁

  • @antoniomranz
    @antoniomranz 10 лет назад +5

    Good explanation but the convention for letters assigned to angles (phi, theta) is different to the more usual one . Theta, usually is used for the angle from z-axis

  • @toastertastic
    @toastertastic 11 лет назад

    I won't pay attention in class, but I'll watch 3 of these in a row and actually make an effort to learn.

  • @edwarddi3833
    @edwarddi3833 4 года назад

    this guy is amazing!

  • @jankipatel2392
    @jankipatel2392 5 лет назад +3

    Lecture on higher order differential equations are available??????

  • @lindsaywaterman2010
    @lindsaywaterman2010 2 года назад

    Since for pi/4 it is part of a sphere, shouldn't the top be curve like the icecream on the top of the cone?

  • @romshamangla8159
    @romshamangla8159 10 лет назад +1

    wonderful!

  • @ashreesatapathy4836
    @ashreesatapathy4836 7 лет назад +3

    why is phi limited from 0 to 180

    • @abdulrahmant8095
      @abdulrahmant8095 7 лет назад +3

      Because in z-axis thing are diffirent than x and y axiis. In z-axis you go with your angle in both dirextion at the same time so 90 degrees in z-axis is like 180 degrees in x-axis & y-axis so 1 rev. will be equal to 180 degrees not 360
      I hope that answered your question..

  • @clapika999
    @clapika999 10 лет назад +3

    in the script i think it should have meant "secant"?

    • @Originalimoc
      @Originalimoc 6 лет назад

      Toan Ngo Didn't use caption. Nice catch.

  • @not_amanullah
    @not_amanullah 2 месяца назад

    Thanks ❤🤍

  • @ormazar9017
    @ormazar9017 Год назад

    What is the form of the line element on the surface of the sphere? Can we transform it to Cartesian coordinates?

  • @memojedi
    @memojedi 13 лет назад

    this guy is great!!!

  • @audreydaleski1067
    @audreydaleski1067 Год назад

    Unit circle, p=1.

  • @timleungck
    @timleungck 12 лет назад +1

    whats the point for me to paying for my host uni.. I cant understand what they were saying and i have to come up to attend lecture from other uni

  • @ycz6
    @ycz6 14 лет назад

    Is there no interactive transcript on this one? I'm not seeing it...

  • @not_amanullah
    @not_amanullah 2 месяца назад

    This is helpful ❤️🤍

  • @anandrukh
    @anandrukh 11 лет назад

    thank you SIR

  • @anilthapa6290
    @anilthapa6290 8 лет назад

    can anybody explain why he place the solid in z plane with 0 x and 0 y,
    it is the plane where direction of force is directed.

    • @mauriciobarda
      @mauriciobarda 8 лет назад

      Because of the simmetry, the force exerted by all the particles in the direction of positive and negative x and y cancel out each other, and only the net force exerted in the Z direction is doing an atraction to the mass little-m.

  • @booitsivilly
    @booitsivilly 12 лет назад

    This lecture video is amazing!

  • @user-ff8nw4wl9h
    @user-ff8nw4wl9h 11 лет назад

    Thank you verhhy much))))

  • @imegatrone
    @imegatrone 12 лет назад

    I Really Like The Video From Your Spherical coordinates surface area.

  • @xinyuli9423
    @xinyuli9423 3 года назад

    50:49 "If the earth collapsed to a
    black hole at the center of the earth with the same mass, you wouldn't notice the difference immediately" LMAO

    • @kemae
      @kemae 2 года назад

      Actually, if the magnetic field is maintained, and you can walk on the shell surface of the earth as usual, there'd be no significant difference

    • @SPRINGGREEN813
      @SPRINGGREEN813 2 месяца назад

      @@kemae Can you explain how?

  • @audreydaleski1067
    @audreydaleski1067 Год назад

    Cospiover4=cospiover4

  • @user-rm6rb3tp5u
    @user-rm6rb3tp5u Год назад

    24:41

  • @debunker1905
    @debunker1905 14 лет назад

    this is entertaining

  • @shawnnyhus2193
    @shawnnyhus2193 9 лет назад

    note to self -a

  • @jameshopkins3541
    @jameshopkins3541 3 года назад

    NI SIQUIERA SIRVE PARA CALCULAR EL VOLUMEN DE LA ESFERA MENOS PARA PROBLEMAS MAS COMPLICADOS.

  • @kavoos1000
    @kavoos1000 14 лет назад

    plane or plain? :))))))) just kidding he is the best and i am thankfull for what he is teaching so bright and clear..

  • @yoadknux
    @yoadknux 12 лет назад

    hmm, attrachon

  • @flowewritharoma
    @flowewritharoma 13 лет назад

    cool mit

  • @jojoblazer777
    @jojoblazer777 10 лет назад

    I totally thought phi = pi/4 was a plane heh. . . Woops.

  • @daniel_liu_it
    @daniel_liu_it 2 года назад

    Why did he take the example of China rather than French 😂

  • @deeptochatterjee532
    @deeptochatterjee532 7 лет назад +1

    Damn, his jokes are just not landing.

  • @yagol777
    @yagol777 11 лет назад

    Lol. Me too